Patients' Attitudes Toward Medical Student Participation Across Specialties: A Systematic Review

Patient satisfaction with clinical services provided by chiropractic students under supervision compared to licensed chiropractors: An observational study

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated patient satisfaction with care provided by chiropractic students under supervision vs supervisors in a Danish hospital setting.

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational study of patient satisfaction was conducted at the Spine Center of Southern Denmark, where chiropractic students from the University of Southern Denmark complete an 8-week internship in their final year of pregraduate training. Patients were assigned to students or supervisors based on administrative convenience (ie, natural allocation). Blinded from the aim of the study, all patients seen by a chiropractor (with or without a student) were invited to answer a questionnaire rating satisfaction with the clinical encounter. Results were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression with group allocation blinded by the investigators.

RESULTS

Results from 438 participants (response rate = 88%) showed no significant difference in patient satisfaction between the student and supervisor groups. Although a small difference favored the supervisor group, the student group had a higher proportion of high and very high satisfaction combined.

CONCLUSION

Satisfaction differed minimally whether patient care was administered by students under the supervision of a licensed chiropractor or by licensed chiropractors alone. Our findings suggest that patients do not negatively view student involvement in clinical consultations at a Danish hospital.

Patient Perceptions of Medical Students' Involvement in Clinical Classes: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Introduction

A crucial aspect of the education of prospective medical professionals is their interaction with patients. The study aimed to explore patients' perspectives on the interaction between medical students and themselves. It sought to understand how patients perceive this dynamic within clinical classes. The goal was to gather insights into the most favorable behavior and demeanor of medical students during these sessions, with the overarching objective of enhancing patient comfort.

Material and Methods

The authors collected a total of 403 surveys from patients of a teaching hospital, regarding their perception of students as healthcare providers. The participants ranged in age from 18 to 92. 53.83% of the participants were female, and 46.17% were male. The surveys were collected between April 8th, 2022, and August 10th, 2022. The results of the anonymous survey undergone statistical analyses using the Mann‒Whitney U-test for comparing two groups and the Kruskal‒Wallis test for comparing more than two groups, because the Shapiro‒Wilk test indicated that the data did not follow a normal distribution.

Results

The study delved into patients' assessments of students' external presentation, adherence to behavioral norms, empathetic qualities, consideration during intimate examinations, and preferences for the organization of clinical classes. Our research indicates notable differences in responses based on age. Specifically, the senior demographic prioritizes students' external presentation, communication and the utilization of courteous language more often than younger individuals (p<0.05). Attendees exhibit varying levels of interest in participating in educational sessions with students based on the ward. Significantly, individuals in the gynecology ward display the least enthusiasm for engagement (p<0.05). Notably, the majority of patients perceive their involvement in the education of future healthcare professionals to be essential (83.38%).

Conclusion

The study found that generally, patients voluntarily engage in educational classes with students. The relationship between patients and students is amicable, and the majority of students display a respectful demeanor toward patients. Nonetheless, preserving patient confidentiality and ensuring the proper management of classes remain persistent issues. This is particularly crucial, especially when the clinical classes pertain to intimate and personal health matters of a patient. Upholding and enriching the organization of such sessions, along with the attentiveness and knowledge of medical students regarding patient comfort, assumes heightened significance.

Public participation in healthcare students' education: An umbrella review

BACKGROUND

An often-hidden element in healthcare students' education is the pedagogy of public involvement, yet public participation can result in deep learning for students with positive impacts on the public who participate.

OBJECTIVE

This article aimed to synthesize published literature reviews that described the impact of public participation in healthcare students' education.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC, PsychINFO, CINAHL, PubMed, JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and the PROSPERO register for literature reviews on public participation in healthcare students' education.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Reviews published in the last 10 years were included if they described patient or public participation in healthcare students' education and reported the impacts on students, the public, curricula or healthcare systems.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were extracted using a predesigned data extraction form and narratively synthesized.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty reviews met our inclusion criteria reporting on outcomes related to students, the public, curriculum and future professional practice.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Our findings raise awareness of the benefits and challenges of public participation in healthcare students' education and may inform future research exploring how public participation can best be utilized in higher education.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

This review was inspired by conversations with public healthcare consumers who saw value in public participation in healthcare students' education. Studies included involved public participants, providing a deeper understanding of the impacts of public participation in healthcare students' education.

Archetypes of incomplete stories in chronic illness medical encounters

OBJECTIVE

During encounters, patients and practitioners engage in conversations to address health concerns. Because these interactions are time-pressured events, it may be inevitable that any story exchanged during these encounters will be incomplete in some way, potentially jeopardizing how quality and safety of care is delivered. In this study, we explored how and why incomplete stories might arise in health interactions.

METHODS

Constructivist grounded theory methodology was used to explore how patients and practitioners approach their interactions during encounters. In this two-phase study, we interviewed patients (n = 21) then practitioners (n = 12).

RESULTS

We identified three distinct archetypes of incomplete storytelling - the hidden story, the interpreted story, and the tailored story. Measured information sharing, triadic encounters and pre-planned agendas influenced these storylines, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both patient and practitioner participants focused on what each considered important, appropriate, and useful for productive encounters. While incomplete stories may be a reality, educating practitioners about how incomplete stories come about from both sides of the conversation creates new opportunities to optimize interactions at medical encounters for in-depth patient practitioner storytelling.

A cross-sectional study on factors influencing patient participation in undergraduate medical education in a public and private hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa

BACKGROUND

The active involvement of patients in medical education is a common practice globally. Despite this, there is a global paucity of data on patients' views on their role in medical education. As such this study aimed to identify factors that influence patient participation in undergraduate medical education in public and private hospitals in Johannesburg.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted, using a 23-question, self-designed, paper questionnaire to collect data on patients' perceptions of student involvement in their care - with regard to consent, confidentiality, ethics, and patient preferences. Participants were recruited on a voluntary basis in the Departments of Medicine, Surgery, and Gynaecology, at selected hospital sites. Fisher's Exact and Chi-Square statistical tests were used where appropriate.

RESULTS

Two hundred and one adult patients, comprised of 150 public sector patients and 51 private sector patients, completed the questionnaire. One hundred and sixty-nine patients (84,1%) were willing to participate in undergraduate medical education and no notable difference between these sectors was demonstrated (p = 0,41). The results further demonstrated that the main factors influencing patient participation in undergraduate medical education across both sectors were (1) the presence of a supervising professional, (2) the perceived degree of invasiveness of a procedure, and (3) the perceived expertise of the student. In addition, data across other key themes such as consent, confidentiality, ethics, and patient preferences and perceptions were elucidated.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the majority of inpatients across the public and private sectors are willing to participate in undergraduate medical education to facilitate the development of healthcare professionals. It also demonstrated that most patients have a positive experience. However, more measures of quality informed consent need to be instituted to optimise the current role of the South African public health sector, whilst facilitating the development of a similar role for the South African private sector in future clinical education. In addition, further research is necessary to evaluate these findings in a South African context.

Interprofessional student-led clinics: the volunteer patient experience

BACKGROUND

Learning from patients and gaining an understanding of their lived experience plays an important role in improving health professions education. However, opportunities for students to engage in interprofessional learning activities involving patients as partners remain limited. In 2018, we developed an interprofessional student-led clinic where people living with Parkinson's Disease voluntarily participated as 'patient-partners'. The aim of this pilot study was to explore patients' experience and motivation for participation.

METHODS

In 2018 the clinic was implemented five times. Four patient volunteers and six to eight students from a mix of disciplines attended each clinic. Qualitative data were collected via semi-structured focus groups with patients. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven patients participated in the focus groups. Patients found the interprofessional nature of the clinic beneficial to their health goals. Their interactions with students from different disciplines helped to build their healthcare knowledge and confidence to ask additional questions of health professionals. Patients felt they offered unique perspectives to students of their own lived experiences. They found sharing their stories with students and each other built a sense of community.

CONCLUSION

Patients felt they enriched the learning environment, helping students to build their knowledge and skills by providing authentic patient perspectives. The interprofessional aspect enhanced the patient experience in a number of ways. Patients found the multiple perspectives of healthcare helped them to build their own knowledge, and reflect on their changing needs. Warranting further investigation, our findings indicate that participation in the clinics may have positively influenced patients' health seeking behaviours.

Medical Education: Patients’ Perspectives on Clinical Training and Informed Consent

There are complex ethical dilemmas inherent to medicine teaching, particularly in clinical practice involving actual patients. Questions must be raised on fulfilling medical students’ training needs while still respecting patients’ fundamental rights to autonomy and privacy. We aimed to assess patients’ perspectives regarding medical students’ involvement in their medical care. An observational, cross-sectional study was developed, and a questionnaire was applied randomly to patients waiting for a consultation/admitted to three distinct departments: General Surgery, Obstetrics/Gynaecology, and Infectious Diseases. Of the 77% interviewed patients who reported previous experiences with medical students, only 59% stated that they were asked for consent for their participation, and 28% stated that students had adequately introduced themselves. Patients from Gynaecology/Obstetrics were the ones who reported lower rates of these practices and were also the ones who were most bothered by students’ presence, stating that they would be more comfortable without the presence of medical students. Male patients received more explanations than female patients regarding the same matters. Thirty-five percent of patients stated that they would feel more comfortable without the medical students’ presence. The study shows a need to pay closer attention to fulfilling patients’ fundamental rights.

Complaint-driven preferences & trust: patient's views on consulting GP trainees

BACKGROUND

Work-based learning depends on patients' consent to have trainees involved in their care. However, patients can refuse trainees, which might lead to the loss of learning experiences. Improved understanding of patients' views on consulting trainees may provide useful insights to further optimise learning for trainees.

METHODS

We performed a qualitative study with 28 patients in The Netherlands. Participants were recruited from GP practices, and were purposively sampled on (un)willingness to consult GP trainees. In semi-structured interviews patients' perspectives and willingness to consult a trainee were explored. Transcripts were thematically analysed using an inductive approach.

RESULTS

Two themes explained patients' views on consulting GP trainees: Presenting complaint-driven preferences and Trust in trainees' capabilities. Patients select their doctor based on complaint-driven preferences and chose trainees if they fulfilled these preferences. For urgent, gender-specific and minor complaints, patients prefer timeliness, gender concordance or availability. Patients with more complex, long-term problems prefer to consult a trusted doctor with whom they have a longitudinal relationship. Through repeated visits and empathic behaviour trainees can become this doctor. Before patients consider consulting a trainee, they need to have trust in the trainee's capabilities. This trust is related to the basic trust patients have in the education of the trainee, their knowledge about trainees' capabilities and supervisory arrangements.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' decision to visit a trainee is fluid. Patients will visit a trainee when their complaint-driven preferences are satisfied. Influencing trainees' fulfilment of these preferences and patients' trust in trainees can make patients more willing to consult trainees.

Exploring patient experiences in the student outpatient clinic - A contribution to learning

OBJECTIVE

To understand how patients experience participation in student encounters.

METHODS

Qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews with ten cardiac surgery patients who had attended voluntary postoperative consultations in a student outpatient clinic. The interview guide included questions about reasons for and experiences of being part of a teaching situation. Interviews were analysed through inductive thematic analysis where pieces of text in each interview were assigned different codes and condensed into themes.

RESULTS

The patients expressed a duality in their reasons for participating in student consultations: (1) a personal need for assurance (safety) and (2) a wish to help students (altruism). Students were perceived as professional and sometimes insecure. Being part of an educational situation was meaningful to the patients because they did not feel objectified. Knowing that there was a backup supervisor made the patients feel safe even though the supervisor was not present during all parts of the consultation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients experienced safety, understood their role in all parts of the consultation, and shared a wish to help students learn.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

A sequential consultation model alternating between student- and supervisor-driven supervision can balance student autonomy and patient safety. This knowledge could guide future patient-centred medical education in student clinics.

Entrustment decisions and the clinical team: A case study of early clinical students

PURPOSE

Clinical learning contexts influence how medical students engage with entrustment decisions. However, it is unclear how students and health care team members perceive the entrustment decision process. This study explored which factors students and team members consider relevant to entrustment decisions in early clinical rotations.

METHODS

The authors conducted a case study at an academic teaching hospital, interviewing 28 medical students and four health care team members during the clerkship year. Within a social constructivist epistemology, we explored students' and health care team members' perceptions of ad hoc entrustment decisions using semi-structured interviews. Transcripts from the interviews and notes from feedback rounds with students were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Medical students in their core clerkship year perceived clinical residents as critical educational gatekeepers and key facilitators of entrustment decisions. Another important theme emerged around students' motivation, initiative and willingness to engage with the health care team and patients. Students actively engaged in trust formation processes with different health care team members. The entrustment decision process was perceived as multilateral and dynamic, involving all health care team members and patients. Multiple entrusting supervisors for clerkship students, including nurses and psychologists, emerged from our interview data. They assumed an active role in negotiating entrustment decisions both with and for clerkship students, either facilitating or hindering opportunities. The entrustment decisions emerged as a result of a multifaceted supervisor network interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Supervising residents' ability to integrate students into clinical teams seems to be a critical factor in facilitating entrustment opportunities for clinical activities. Students' active management of informal supervisor networks of health care team members and these team members' willingness to assume responsibility for the students' education emerged as relevant aspects for ad hoc entrustment. Our data suggest that supervision from different health professionals is beneficial for clinical education of medical students and merits further exploration.

Patient outlook on bedside teaching in a medical school

Objective

Bedside teaching is an important element of training undergraduate and postgraduate medical students to attain clinical skills. The perceptions of patients about bedside teaching vary significantly based on their understanding of the educational climate in hospitals. This study aimed to evaluate the views of diverse groups of patients on bedside teaching and the degree of involvement of medical students in their clinical decision-making processes.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted among patients admitted to various departments of a tertiary care hospital. A total of 200 patients were surveyed by students using a questionnaire, which covered their knowledge, views, and expectations with respect to medical students in hospital settings and bedside teaching.

Results

The majority (83.5%) of patients surveyed felt that the students made the hospital environment more comfortable and friendly. Male patients chose to permit students' involvement more than female patients. Among the female patients, teens, young adults, and unmarried women were more positive towards students' direct participation in their physical examinations. Health concerns and stress were issues for adults and older patients, whereas privacy and confidentiality concerned the younger age group. Patients admitted to the obstetrics and gynaecology wards were more likely to reject student involvement in hospital procedures than patients in other departments.

Conclusion

Most of the patients had a markedly positive attitude towards bedside teaching. Alternative methods of teaching can be implemented in situations where patients feel uncomfortable with students' involvement during their hospital stay.

Patients as teachers: Evaluating the experiences of volunteer inpatients during medical student clinical skills training

PURPOSE

Early patient encounters in medical education are an important element of clinical skill development. This study explores the experiences of volunteer inpatients (VIPs) participating in clinical skills training with junior medical students (JMS) solely for educational purposes.

METHODS

Following first-year medical students practicing history taking and clinical examinations with VIPs at Toronto General Hospital (TGH) and Toronto Western Hospital (TWH), patients completed a questionnaire and a short audio-recorded interview. This study used a mixed methodological approach. A 5-point Likert-scaled survey queried satisfaction regarding the recruitment process, student and faculty interactions and patient demographics (e.g. age and educational background). A 10-minute follow-up interview investigated patient perspectives. Survey responses were correlated to patient demographics and descriptive thematic analysis summarized trends in patient perspectives.

RESULTS

Of 93 consenting VIPs, 66% were male and 58% participated at TGH. The mean overall experience was positive (4.76 and 4.93 at TGH and TWH, respectively). Three themes emerging through thematic analysis were Not "Just" a Medical Student, Patient as Teacher, and Promoting Best Practices. VIPs reported positive experiences when they were adequately informed of the VIP role during recruitment, and when students exhibited confidence, interest, and respect throughout the session.

CONCLUSION

Study results provide clarity about VIP experiences with JMS and lay a foundation for improved patient satisfaction and best practices within clinical skills curricula in the health professions.

Patients' experiences of being treated by an interprofessional student team compared with uniprofessional treatment by residents supported by nurses: a case study

Clinical experience, preferably interprofessional, is an important part of health professionals' undergraduate training. In recent years, more and more patient treatment has been moving to outpatient clinics with research suggesting hat this shift is not compromising students' learning outcomes. The purpose of this study was to explore orthopedic outpatients' perceived experiences of being treated by an interprofessional student team consisting of one medical and one nursing student versus being treated by a resident doctor supported by nurses in a uniprofessional setup. We performed an exploratory single case study with two embedded units: 1) a quantitative part with a survey (n = 89) including seven questions and 2) a qualitative part with interviews (n = 46). In the questionnaire, three of the seven questions revealed a significant difference in favor of the student teams. However, the qualitative part of the study did not indicate any differences between the groups. In this study, patients' experiences in an orthopedic outpatient clinic were not influenced by being treated by interprofessional student teams compared to normal patient pathway with registrars and nurses working uniprofessionally. This information is important in designing and implementing student curriculums with clinical training in outpatient clinics. Furthermore, the interprofessional student team can undertake unassisted consultations with selected patients with indirect supervision from the supervisors, making the clinical setting realistic for the students. However, in this teaching model, feedback to the students relies only on the students' written patient records; even if patient satisfaction is high, structured observation of student performance may be necessary as a supplementary teaching tool. This may be incorporated in future studies of patient-student relations in clinical training in an outpatient setting.

The Impact of Trainee Nationality on Patient Acceptance of Obstetrics and Gynecology Care: A Chinese Study

Phenomenon: China is a relatively homogenous nation where the majority of people are Han Chinese. In recent years, a large number of international students have begun to study medicine in China. Due to the privacy and intimacy associated with obstetrical and gynecological diseases, Chinese women's acceptance toward international students' involvement in their care has not been reported thus far. This survey aims (1) to determine Chinese women's attitudes toward both Chinese and international medical student involvements in obstetrical and gynecological outpatient departments and (2) to investigate possible reasons, if any, for their rejection of the medical students. Approach: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study using a locally-developed questionnaire. The survey was conducted in the obstetrical and gynecological outpatient department of a tertiary hospital in a Chinese harbor city. We surveyed 600 patients for their attitudes towards the involvement of four groups of medical student in clinical practice: Chinese female, International female, Chinese male, and International male. Among the returned questionnaires, 501 satisfied the criteria for analysis. Findings: Patient's acceptance rates of the four groups of students (Chinese female, International female, Chinese male, and International male) were 59.7%, 55.9%, 32.1%, and 25.9%, respectively. Analysis revealed that language barriers and lack of friendliness were the two main reasons leading to patients' low acceptance rates of international students. Insights: Obstetrical and gynecological patients are more likely to accept female students over male students, regardless of their nationality, however International male students receive the least acceptance. For international students, improving their Chinese language skills and using more friendly expressions may facilitate their practice in China.

Patient Satisfaction With Medical Student Participation in a Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship: A Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

To determine whether longitudinal student involvement improves patient satisfaction with care.

METHOD

The authors conducted a satisfaction survey of patients followed by 10 University of Minnesota Medical School students enrolled in 2016-2017 in the Veterans Affairs Longitudinal Undergraduate Medical Education (VALUE) program, a longitudinal integrated clerkship at the Minneapolis Veterans Health Care System. Students were embedded in an ambulatory practice with primary preceptors who assigned students a panel of 14 to 32 patients to follow longitudinally in inpatient and outpatient settings. Control patients, matched on disease severity, were chosen from the preceptor's panel. Two to five months after the students completed the VALUE program, the authors conducted a phone survey of the VALUE and control patients using a validated, customized questionnaire.

RESULTS

Results are reported from 97 VALUE patients (63% response rate) and 72 controls (47% response rate) who had similar baseline characteristics. Compared with control patients, VALUE patients reported greater satisfaction with explanations provided by their health care provider, their provider's knowledge of their personal history, and their provider's looking out for their best interests (P < .05). Patients in the VALUE panel selected the top category more often than control patients for overall satisfaction with their health care (65% vs 43%, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this controlled trial demonstrate that VALUE student longitudinal participation in patient care improves patient satisfaction and patient-perceived quality of health care for VALUE patients compared with controls matched by primary care provider and disease severity. These findings may have implications outside the Veterans Administration population.

Alliance, Trust, and Loss: Experiences of Patients Cared for by Students in a Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship

PURPOSE

The longitudinal integrated clerkship (LIC) model, which allows medical students to participate in comprehensive care of a panel of patients over time, is rapidly expanding because of recognized benefits to students and faculty. This study aimed to determine how LIC student contact affected patients' experiences and self-described health outcomes.

METHOD

This qualitative case study used semistructured patient interviews to understand the impact of LIC learners at the University of Colorado School of Medicine on patients at Denver Health. Patients with at least 3 encounters with an LIC student and over age 18 were selected. Thirty patients were invited to participate in 2016-2017; 14 (47%) completed interviews before the thematic analysis reached saturation. Four researchers independently analyzed interview transcripts and reached consensus on emergent categories and themes.

RESULTS

Six broad themes were identified: beginnings of a relationship, caring demonstrated by student, growing to trust student, reaching a therapeutic alliance, improvement of patient outcomes due to student involvement, and a sense of loss after students completed the LIC program.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients deeply valued the therapeutic alliances built with LIC students involved in their care over time. These alliances led to improved patient experience, mitigation of perceived health system failures, and subjective improvement in health outcomes. Patients described a sense of loss at the end of the LIC when students were no longer involved in their care. Curricula that support students building longitudinal therapeutic relationships with their patients are an opportunity to improve patient experience while promoting students' professional development.

Treating and teaching: using publicly available data to explore the relationship between student and patient evaluations of teaching hospitals

Introduction: Treating patients and teaching medical students are parallel activities that occur at teaching hospitals. However, the relationship between these activities is poorly understood. There have been multiple calls for assessing the quality of medical education by examining publicly available clinical data but there is minimal evidence linking these variables. Method: In this proof-of-principle study, the authors examined publicly available Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (H-CAHPS)^Ⓡ data collected during Calendar Year 2013 to explore the relationship between patient evaluations of their hospital experience and medical student evaluations of the educational experience at that site. Results: Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were calculated for multiple variables. Patient ratings of doctor-patient communication correlated with student ratings of organization (R=0.882, p=0.048), educational value (R=0.882, p=0.048), teaching (R=0.963, p=0.008), and evaluation and feedback (R=0.920, p=0.027). Conclusion: These findings provide preliminary evidence for a relationship between patient experiences and the quality of education at that site. Further studies linking clinical and education outcomes are needed to explore this relationship in more depth. The contributions of specific hospital locations, providers, or clerkships need to be evaluated. Studies examining these relationships have the potential to improve both patient care and medical education.

An inconvenient discussion

This commentary argues for the importance of informing patients about their participation in medical education when being cared for by trainees.

Impact of supervised student optometry consultations on the patient experience

BACKGROUND

Understanding patient perceptions of having students involved in their clinical care is important as we strive to develop optimal models of care that integrate teaching with the best possible experience for the patient. The aim was to ascertain the impact of supervised optometry student consultations on the patient experience.

METHODS

A survey comprising 45 questions was mailed to consecutive adult patients who had undergone a comprehensive eye examination at the Australian College of Optometry over a four-week period.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 193 patients who had a student involved in their care (44 per cent response rate; 156 completed correctly) and 177 who did not have a student involved (32 per cent response rate; 105 completed correctly). There was no significant difference in overall patient satisfaction between the teaching and non-teaching clinics (p = 0.18). Over 87 per cent of patients in the teaching clinic felt completely comfortable with a student examining them, 44 per cent felt their care was better because a student was involved and 97 per cent rated the overall performance of the student as very good or good. Although 12 per cent would rather have seen only the optometrist and three per cent would not be happy to have a student involved in their eye care again, 100 per cent believed it is important for students to work with patients. The most common reason for student acceptance was the importance of students needing opportunities to learn. The main reasons for unwillingness to have a student involved in future were the additional time taken and prolonged testing.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that most patients view supervised student involvement in their optometric care as an important and highly positive experience. However, efforts should be made to avoid excessively long consultations and prolonged testing. Concerns about patient satisfaction and acceptance are largely unwarranted and should not prevent optometry students being involved in patient care.