Treatment of refractory acute leukemia with timed sequential chemotherapy using topotecan followed by etoposide + mitoxantrone (T-EM) and correlation with topoisomerase II levels

Phase II study of topotecan and thalidomide in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

This phase II trial investigated the safety and preliminary efficacy of a topotecan/thalidomide combination therapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome who had refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB), RAEB with transformation, or chronic myelomonocytic anemia. Patients received three 21-day cycles of topotecan 1.25 mg/m(2) on days 1-5, which was repeated for two additional cycles in patients whose bone marrow blast percentages did not decrease. Oral thalidomide was then started at 100 mg/day (with the dose escalated up to 300 mg/day if well tolerated) for up to 1 year. Patients were monitored throughout the trial for hematologic and clinical adverse events, and efficacy was assessed using International Working Group (IWG) criteria. Forty-five patients, mostly elderly (median age 68 years; range 52-79 years), were enrolled. Therapy was generally well tolerated compared to high-dose chemotherapy. Three patients died from disease progression/infections during topotecan therapy, and four patients discontinued topotecan because of high-grade neutropenia (two patients), syncope (one patient), or hip surgery (one patient). Of 24 patients who received thalidomide, three discontinued because of treatment-related toxicity. Thirty-eight patients were evaluable for response: nine (24%) had hematologic improvement and 13 (34%) had stable disease. Responses occurred in patients with all disease subtypes. Six patients achieved transfusion independence, and one patient had a trilineage response. Approximately one-third of the patients had decreases in bone marrow blasts of 50%. Therefore, a topotecan and thalidomide combination therapy is promising, although further studies are needed to determine the optimum doses and schedule.

A phase I trial of irinotecan alternating with epirubicin in patients with advanced malignancies

OBJECTIVES

This phase I study was conducted to evaluate the combination of irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, with epirubicin, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, when administered sequentially on a once-every-three week basis.

METHODS

Irinotecan was administered at doses ranging from 100 to 150 mg/m(2) intravenously over 90 minutes, 24 hours before epirubicin, in doses from 30 to 60 mg/m(2), every 3 weeks. Toxicity assessments were performed weekly. Tumor evaluation by radiographic and physical examination was performed after every 3 cycles using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients with metastatic solid tumors were enrolled in this study. The maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose was irinotecan 150 mg/m(2) and epirubicin 30 mg/m(2). Dose-limiting toxicities were primarily neutropenia. Other toxicities at this dose level were mild. Three patients with colon cancer, 1 patient with renal cell cancer and 1 patient with adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the ethmoid sinus had stable disease. No objective responses were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose for irinotecan and epirubicin administered 24 hours apart every 3 weeks was 150 mg/m(2) and 30 mg/m(2), respectively. Higher doses were limited by significant hematologic toxicity and fatigue.

Sequential topoisomerase targeting and analysis of mechanisms of resistance to topotecan in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia

Resistance to topoisomerase I (TOP1)-targeting drugs such as topotecan often involves upregulation of topoisomerase II (TOP2), with accompanying increased sensitivity to TOP2-targeting drugs such as etoposide. This trial was designed to investigate sequential topoisomerase targeting in the treatment of patients with high-risk acute myelogenous leukemia. An initial cohort of patients received topotecan and cytosine arabinoside daily for 5 days. Serial samples of circulating mononuclear cells were examined to evaluate peak elevations of TOP2-alpha protein expression. In subsequent cohorts, etoposide was administered daily for 3 days, beginning 6 h after initiation of the topotecan infusion. The etoposide dose was escalated to determine a maximum-tolerated dose. Circulating mononuclear cells were analyzed for TOP1 mutations and ABCG2 protein expression. In addition, systemic and intracellular topotecan concentrations were measured. Thirty-one patients were enrolled. On the basis of TOP1-alpha protein levels in three patients with peripheral blast counts greater than 50%, etoposide administration began 6 h after initiation of the topotecan/cytosine arabinoside infusion. Using this schedule of administration, the maximum-tolerated dose of etoposide was 90 mg/m. No TOP1 mutations were identified, but increases in ABCG2 expression during the infusion were observed in mononuclear cells from two of four evaluable patients. Administration of etoposide 6 h after initiation of a topotecan/cytosine arabinoside infusion is feasible and is associated with clinical activity. Analysis of TOP2-alpha protein levels in this small number of patients indicated that peak increases occurred earlier than expected based on earlier publications. Upregulation of ABCG2 was detected in circulating cells and may represent an inducible form of drug resistance that should be investigated further.

Sequential oral 9-nitrocamptothecin and etoposide: a pharmacodynamic- and pharmacokinetic-based phase I trial

PURPOSE

Resistance to topoisomerase (topo) I inhibitors has been related to down-regulation of nuclear target enzyme, whereas sensitization to topo II inhibitors may result from induction of topo II by topo I inhibitors. Here, we evaluated a sequence-specific administration of a topo I inhibitor followed by a topo II inhibitor.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Twenty-five patients with advanced or metastatic malignancies were treated with increasing doses (0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, or 2.0 mg/m(2)) of 9-nitrocamptothecin (9-NC) on days 1 to 3, followed by etoposide (100 or 150 mg/d) on days 4 and 5. At the maximally tolerated dose, 20 additional patients were enrolled. The median age was 60 years (range, 40-84 years). Endpoints included pharmacokinetic analyses of 9-NC and etoposide, and treatment-induced modulations of topo I and II expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

RESULTS

Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fatigue were dose-limiting toxicities and occurred in six patients. Despite a median number of four prior regimens (range 1-12), 2 (4%) patients had an objective response and 13 (29%) patients had stable disease. In contrast to the expected modulation in topo I and IIalpha levels, we observed a decrease in topo IIalpha levels, whereas topo I levels were not significantly altered by 9-NC treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequence-specific administration of 9-NC and etoposide is tolerable and active. However, peripheral blood mononuclear cells may not be a predictive biological surrogate for drug-induced modulation of topo levels in tumor tissues and should be further explored in larger studies.

Inhibition of efflux transporter ABCG2/BCRP does not restore mitoxantrone sensitivity in irinotecan-selected human leukemia CPT-K5 cells: evidence for multifactorial multidrug resistance

It has been shown that the human acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) T cell line (RPMI 8402) selected with irinotecan (CPT-11) is transformed to a multidrug resistant (MDR) phenotype (CPT-K5) with cross-resistance to mitoxantrone (MX). Since MX is a well-documented substrate for the efflux transporter breast cancer resistant protein (BCRP/ABCG2), we assessed the contribution of drug efflux to MX resistance in CPT-K5 cells. Our results demonstrate that CPT-K5 cells had markedly higher expression levels of BCRP, negligible expression of MRP2 and P-gp, and lower intracellular retention of MX as compared to RPMI 8402 cells. Surprisingly, MX resistance in CPT-K5 cells was not reversed by the BCRP chemical inhibitor, novobiocin (NOV), or gene-specific siRNA, although intracellular MX concentrations were significantly increased when BCRP was functionally knocked down. These results suggest that up-regulation of BCRP plays a minimal role in conferring MX resistance to CPT-K5 cells, highlighting the existence of multiple, redundant mechanisms of drug resistance. The current results support the concept of "multifactorial multidrug resistance", a recently-described phenomenon that ascribes multidrug resistance to many possible cellular mechanisms, not only by efflux drug transporters.

Pharmacokinetically guided phase I trial of topotecan and etoposide phosphate in recurrent ovarian cancer

A pharmacokinetically guided phase I study of topotecan and etoposide phosphate was conducted in recurrent ovarian cancer. The scheduling of the topoisomerase I and II inhibitors was determined using in vitro activity data. All patients had recurrent disease following prior platinum-containing chemotherapy. Patients had a World Health Organisation performance status of 0–2 and adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function. Treatment was with topotecan intravenously for 5 days followed immediately by a 5-day intravenous infusion of etoposide phosphate (EP), with pharmacokinetically guided dose adjustment. Plasma etoposide levels were measured on days 2 and 4 of the infusion. A total of 21 patients entered the study. In all, 48% were platinum resistant and 71% had received prior paclitaxel. The main toxicities were haematological, short lived and reversible. A total of 29% of patients experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia and 66% grade 4 neutropenia after the first cycle. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was dose limiting. The maximum-tolerated dose was topotecan 0.85 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ days 1–5 followed immediately by a 5-day infusion of EP at a plasma concentration of 1 μg ml⁻¹. The response rate (RR) was 28% in 18 evaluable patients. There was marked interpatient variability in topoisomerase IIα levels measured from peripheral lymphocytes, with no observed increase following topotecan. This regimen of topotecan followed by EP demonstrated good activity in recurrent ovarian cancer and was noncrossresistant with paclitaxel. Both the toxicity and RR was higher than would be expected from the single agent data, in keeping with synergy of action.

A phase II study of timed sequential therapy of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) for patients over the age of 60: two cycle timed sequential therapy with topotecan, ara-C and mitoxantrone in adults with poor-risk AML

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the elderly is a serious problem characterized by poor response to therapy and short survival. To improve response to therapy, a timed sequential therapy (TST) approach was designed utilizing topotecan, cytosine arabinoside (ara-C) and mitoxantrone based on multiple studies suggesting that topotecan and mitoxantrone are effective in older patients. Thirty-two adults, >or=60-year-old (median age 69) were included. None had favorable cytogenetics and 44% had and antecedent myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or 2 degrees AML. Fifty-nine percent achieved a complete response (CR). Median overall survival (OS) was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.1-12.0 months; range, 15 days to 25.3 months). Disease-free survival (DFS) for the 19 patients achieving a CR was 7.7 months (95% CI: 6.1-13.7 months; range, 2.9-25.3 months). There were no differences in OS or DFS between cytogenetic or disease etiology groups. Although TST was well tolerated, long-term results in this group of patients are not satisfactory and new approaches are needed.

A new multidrug reinduction protocol with topotecan, vinorelbine, thiotepa, dexamethasone, and gemcitabine for relapsed or refractory acute leukemia

We report the results of a phase 2 nonrandomized single-arm trial of a combination therapy for relapsed or refractory leukemia. From January 1999 to June 2002, 28 patients with multiple relapsed or refractory acute leukemia received a combination of topotecan, vinorelbine, thiotepa, dexamethasone, and, for patients with an M3 marrow on day 7, gemcitabine. A total of 14 patients had pre-B-ALL (acute lymphoblastic leukemia), three had T-cell leukemia, nine acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML), and two biphenotypic leukemia. In all, 13 patients achieved a significant response (10 complete responses and three partial responses). Among the responders, five had pre-B-ALL, two had T-cell leukemias, five had AML, and one had biphenotypic leukemia. In total, 10 of these patients subsequently underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and four are alive without disease. One patient died, while in remission, of complications resulting from an episode of sepsis and pneumonia that occurred during topotecan, vinorelbine, thiotepa, dexamethasone, and gemcitabine (TVTG) reinduction. Other toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia in all patients and transient grade 2 hepatotoxicity in 10 patients (36%). In summary, we report that 47% of heavily pretreated pediatric patients with multiply relapsed or refractory leukemia achieved a significant response after therapy on the TVTG protocol. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the role of the TVTG combination in the treatment of leukemia.

Cancer therapy: new targets for chemotherapy

The number two cause of mortality in developed countries is cancer. Despite the enormous effort put into cancer prevention, early diagnosis and treatment, it is likely that the incidence of the cancer morbidity and mortality will increase for the foreseeable future. This is due to various factors such as increased life expectancy, changes in environment and also the socio-economic situation around the world. Some cancer attracts more attention than others and increasingly epidemiological information is reaching the general public and is beginning to influence behavior. It is now well recognized that, for example, 1 of 8 women in the industrialized world will be diagnosed with breast cancer. Additionally, a strong correlation was established between lung cancer incidence and smoking and it is broadly accepted that the incidence of colon cancer is directly related to age and diet, and has been increasing over time. The current failure of preventive measures to significantly reduce the increasing incidence of these common tumors illustrates the importance of effective cancer treatment strategies, including chemotherapy. The combination of various anticancer drugs, given together with surgery and radiotherapy, gives hope to many patients. There has been recent evidence of improved therapeutic outcome with recent approaches and newer agents but for continuing effective chemotherapeutic treatment there is a need for a detailed understanding of their mechanisms of action and on the rationale of their application. This review attempts to provide up-to-date information regarding the development of new and innovative treatment strategies for cancer chemotherapy. Virtually, every year several of new targets for cancer therapy on both, cellular and molecular levels, are identified and new drugs enter not only clinical trials but also are included in well accepted and documented therapeutic protocols. As this review is in addition to our review published previously (Medical Principles and Practice 11, 2002, 117-125), we have tried to include new and innovative targets and drugs that attract attention at present. Although it is not possible to provide a complete list of all achievements and cover all work done in this field, we hope to be able to give some insight into this rapidly developing area.