Results of a clinical phase I dose-escalation study of cytarabine in combination with fixed-dose vinorelbine, paclitaxel, etoposide and cisplatin for the treatment of relapsed/refractory lymphoma

An overview on anti-tubulin agents for the treatment of lymphoma patients

Anti-tubulin agents constitute a large class of compounds with broad activity both in solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, due to the interference with microtubule dynamics. Since microtubules play crucial roles in the regulation of the mitotic spindles, the interference with their function usually leads to a block in cell division with arrest at the metaphase/anaphase junction of mitosis, followed to apoptosis. This explains the reason why tubulin-binding agents (TBAs) proved to be extremely active in patients with cancer. Several anti-tubulin agents are indicated in the treatment of patients with lymphomas both alone and in combination chemotherapy regimens. The article reviews the literature on classic and more recent anti-tubulin agents, providing an insight into their mechanisms of action and their use in the treatment of lymphoma.

Advancement in high dose therapy and autologous stem cell rescue in lymphoma

Although advanced stage aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas and Hodgkin’s disease are thought to be chemotherapy-responsive cancers, a considerable number of patients either relapse or never attain a remission. High-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is often the only possibility of cure for most of these patients. However, many controversial issues still remain with respect to HDT/ASCT for lymphomas, including its role for, the optimal timing of transplantation, the best conditioning regimen and the potential use of localized radiotherapy or immunologic methods to decrease post-transplant recurrence. Recently, mainly due to the unavailability of carmustine, several novel conditioning protocols have been clinically developed, with the aim of improving the overall outcome by enhancing the anti-lymphoma effect and, at the same time, by reducing short and long-term toxicity. Furthermore, the better safety profiles of novel approaches would definitively allow patients aged more than 65-70 years to benefit from this therapeutic option. In this review, we will briefly discuss the most relevant and recent data available regarding HDT/ASCT in lymphomas.

Treatment Strategies for Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Past, Present, and Future

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most commonly occurring lymphoma in the Western world. DLBCL is a clinically, biologically, and pathologically heterogeneous entity with biologically distinct subtypes that have different expected treatment outcomes. The addition of rituximab to combination chemotherapy has improved outcomes for all patients with DLBCL and can produce cure for many individuals. Relapsed DLBCL is generally managed with salvage chemo-immunotherapy followed by high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation which can cure additional patients. However, outcomes for patients who relapse early after upfront rituximab and chemotherapy have a poorer prognosis. Novel therapies and strategies are desperately needed for these patients and several emerging treatments hold promise for improving DLBCL treatment outcomes in the future.

Patterns of social support among lymphoma patients considering stem cell transplantation

There is lack of literature addressing factors that influence the process of care for patients with hematological malignancies. We evaluated the forms of social support available for patients with relapsed lymphoma considering stem cell transplantation and examined the influence of support on treatment delay. Data were collected from 119 patients with relapsed lymphoma using a questionnaire to capture sociodemographic information and emotional, informational, and instrumental forms of social support. Sixty-four percent of the patients were married, 56% had children over 18 years of age, 43% were employed, and 72% had private health insurance. Family members formed a major source of emotional support (83%), while 47% of patients considered personal prayers to be important. While 79% of patients received clinical support from nurses, few received formal group support or formal peer support (6.7% and 1.7% respectively). Support from extended family and peer groups reduced the likelihood of treatment delays. The potential benefits of peer group support should be reinforced for patients considering transplantation given how infrequent this form of social support is utilized and its positive impact on the process of care. Future studies should test the impact of social support on health outcomes especially among the underserved population.

Optimizing the timing of chemotherapy for mobilizing autologous blood hematopoietic progenitor cells

BACKGROUND

Postchemotherapy mobilization results were reviewed in patients undergoing apheresis before planned autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation to improve the timing of collection procedures.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 135 attempts to collect autologous HPC were studied in 132 unique patients with lymphoid malignancies (non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and Hodgkin's disease). Chemotherapy mobilization regimens included cyclophosphamide (n = 59), ICE (n = 46), or other regimens (n = 30). Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (CSF) was administered once daily at a dose of 5 microg per kg starting 2 days after the last dose of chemotherapy; granulocyte-macrophage-CSF was added at a daily dose of 5 microg per kg 6 days later. Apheresis was initiated when the blood CD34+ content was more than 20 per microL.

RESULTS

In an initial cohort of 37 patients, 27 percent required apheresis during the weekend. An optimized timing for chemotherapy mobilization was developed based on retrospective data; prospective implementation of the new algorithm reduced the incidence of weekend apheresis to 13 percent in the subsequent 98 consecutive patients (p < 0.05). A median of 9 x 10(6) (range, 0.4 x 10(6)-96 x 10(6)) CD34+ cells per kg was collected from the entire cohort of 135 patients after a mean of 1.8 days of apheresis. Apheresis was initiated following a median (+/-SD) of 10 +/- 2.7 days of cytokines.

CONCLUSION

In the majority of patients, the first day of apheresis occurred 11 to 13 days after the last dose of chemotherapy with a variety of different chemotherapy regimens. Administering the last dose of chemotherapy on Thursday or Friday versus Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday was associated with a 77 percent lower incidence in the frequency of weekend apheresis collections (p < 0.001).