Tafasitamab for the treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) require additional treatments, especially those not eligible or not responding to high dose cytotoxic chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Over the last few years, several new treatments have been developed and approved for these patients, among them of particular relevance are those targeting CD19. Tafasitamab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CD19, composed of a modified fragment crystallizable (Fc) region engineered with higher affinity for Fc gamma receptors (FcγR) receptors, leading to increased cytotoxicity through natural killer cells and macrophages (antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis). In this product review, we will discuss its mechanism of action, safety profile and efficacy results from clinical trials that led to its approval in combination with lenalidomide for patients with R/R DLBCL ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous transplantation.

Loncastuximab tesirine in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: long-term efficacy and safety from the phase II LOTIS-2 study

Therapies that demonstrate durable, long-term responses with manageable safety and tolerability are needed for patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). Loncastuximab tesirine (loncastuximab tesirine-lpyl [Lonca]), an anti-CD19 antibody conjugated to a potent pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer, demonstrated single-agent antitumor activity in the pivotal phase II LOTIS-2 study in heavily pretreated patients with R/R DLBCL. Here we present updated efficacy and safety analyses from LOTIS-2, performed for all patients and in subsets of patients with a complete response (CR), including patients with CR who were event-free (no progressive disease or death) for ≥1 year and ≥2 years from cycle 1, day 1 of treatment. Lonca was administered every 3 weeks (0.15 mg/kg for 2 cycles; 0.075 mg/kg for subsequent cycles). As of the final data cutoff (September 15, 2022; median follow-up: 7.8 months [range, 0.3-42.6]), 70 of 145 (48.3%) patients achieved an overall response. Thirty-six (24.8%) patients achieved CR, of which 16 (44%) and 11 (31%) were event-free for ≥1 year and ≥2 years, respectively. In the all-treated population, the median overall survival was 9.5 months; the median progression-free survival was 4.9 months. Among patients with CR, median overall survival and progression-free survival were not reached, with 24-month overall and progression-free survival rates of 68.2% (95% CI: 50.0-81.0) and 72.5% (95% CI: 48.2-86.8), respectively. No new safety concerns were detected. With additional follow-up, Lonca continued to demonstrate durable, long-term responses with manageable safety and tolerability in patients with CR (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT03589469).

TLD-1, a novel liposomal doxorubicin, in patients with advanced solid tumors: Dose escalation and expansion part of a multicenter open-label phase I trial (SAKK 65/16)

BACKGROUND

TLD-1 is a novel liposomal doxorubicin that compared favorably to conventional doxorubicin liposomal formulations in preclinical models. This phase I first-in-human study aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety and preliminary activity of TLD-1 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We recruited patients with advanced solid tumors who failed standard therapy and received up to 3 prior lines of palliative systemic chemotherapy. TLD-1 was administered intravenously every 3 weeks up to a maximum of 9 cycles (6 for patients with prior anthracyclines) from a starting dose of 10 mg/m2, according to an accelerated titration design followed by a modified continual reassessment method.

RESULTS

30 patients were enrolled between November 2018 and May 2021. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed. Maximum administered dose of TLD-1 was 45 mg/m2, RP2D was defined at 40 mg/m2. Most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) of any grade included palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) (50% of patients), oral mucositis (50%), fatigue (30%) and skin rash (26.7%). Most common G3 TRAE included PPE in 4 patients (13.3%) and oral mucositis in 2 (6.7%). Overall objective response rate was 10% in the whole population and 23.1% among 13 patients with breast cancer; median time-to-treatment failure was 2.7 months. TLD-1 exhibit linear pharmacokinetics, with a median terminal half-life of 95 h.

CONCLUSIONS

The new liposomal doxorubicin formulation TLD-1 showed a favourable safety profile and antitumor activity, particularly in breast cancer. RP2D was defined at 40 mg/m2 administered every 3 weeks. (NCT03387917).

IELSG30 phase 2 trial: intravenous and intrathecal CNS prophylaxis in primary testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

ABSTRACT

Primary testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PTL) is characterized by high risk of contralateral testis and central nervous system (CNS) relapse. Chemoimmunotherapy with intrathecal (IT) CNS prophylaxis and contralateral testis irradiation eliminates contralateral recurrences and reduces CNS relapses. The IELSG30 phase 2 study investigated feasibility and activity of an intensified IT and IV CNS prophylaxis. Patients with stage I/II PTL who had not received treatment received 2 cycles of IV high-dose methotrexate (MTX) (1.5 g/m2) after 6 cycles of the R-CHOP regimen (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, every 21 days). IT liposomal cytarabine was administered on day 0 of cycles 2 to 5 of 21-day R-CHOP regimen. Contralateral testis radiotherapy (25-30 Gy) was recommended. Fifty-four patients (median age: 66 years) with stage I (n = 32) or II (n = 22) disease were treated with R-CHOP, 53 received at least 3 doses of IT cytarabine, 48 received at least 1 dose of IV MTX, and 50 received prophylactic radiotherapy. No unexpected toxicity occurred. At a median follow-up of 6 years, there was no CNS relapse; 7 patients progressed, and 8 died, with 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates of 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79-96) and 92% (95% CI, 81-97), respectively. Extranodal recurrence was documented in 6 patients (in 2 without nodal involvement). In 4 cases, the relapse occurred >6 years after treatment. Causes of death were lymphoma (n = 4), second primary malignancy (n = 1), cerebral vasculopathy (n = 1), unknown (n = 2). Intensive prophylaxis was feasible and effective in preventing CNS relapses. Late relapses, mainly at extranodal sites, represented the most relevant pattern of failure. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00945724.

ERBB4-Mediated Signaling Is a Mediator of Resistance to PI3K and BTK Inhibitors in B-cell Lymphoid Neoplasms

BTK and PI3K inhibitors are among the drugs approved for the treatment of patients with lymphoid neoplasms. Although active, their ability to lead to long-lasting complete remission is rather limited, especially in the lymphoma setting. This indicates that tumor cells often develop resistance to the drugs. We started from a marginal zone lymphoma cell line, Karpas-1718, kept under prolonged exposure to the PI3Kδ inhibitor idelalisib until acquisition of resistance, or with no drug. Cells underwent transcriptome, miRNA and methylation profiling, whole-exome sequencing, and pharmacologic screening, which led to the identification of the overexpression of ERBB4 and its ligands HBEGF and NRG2 in the resistant cells. Cellular and genetic experiments demonstrated the involvement of this axis in blocking the antitumor activity of various BTK/PI3K inhibitors, currently used in the clinical setting. Addition of recombinant HBEGF induced resistance to BTK/PI3K inhibitors in parental cells and in additional lymphoma models. Combination with the ERBB inhibitor lapatinib was beneficial in resistant cells and in other lymphoma models already expressing the identified resistance factors. An epigenetic reprogramming sustained the expression of the resistance-related factors, and pretreatment with demethylating agents or EZH2 inhibitors overcame the resistance. Resistance factors were also shown to be expressed in clinical specimens. In conclusion, we showed that the overexpression of ERBB4 and its ligands represents a novel mechanism of resistance for lymphoma cells to bypass the antitumor activity of BTK and PI3K inhibitors and that targeted pharmacologic interventions can restore sensitivity to the small molecules.

IELSG38: phase II trial of front-line chlorambucil plus subcutaneous rituximab induction and maintenance in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma

The IELSG38 trial was conducted to investigate the effects of subcutaneous (SC) rituximab on the complete remission (CR) rate and the benefits of SC maintenance in patients with extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) who received frontline treatment with chlorambucil plus rituximab. Study treatment comprised an induction phase with chlorambucil 6 mg/m2/day orally on weeks 1-6, 9-10, 13-14, 17-18, and 21-22, and rituximab 375 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 of weeks 1-4, and 1400 mg SC on weeks 9, 13, 17, and 21. Then, a maintenance phase followed with rituximab administered at 1400 mg SC every two months for two years. Of the 112 patients enrolled, 109 were evaluated for efficacy. The CR rates increased from 52% at the end of the induction phase to 70% upon completion of the maintenance phase. With a median follow-up of 5.8 years, the 5-year event-free, progression-free, and overall survival rates were 87% (95% CI, 78-92), 84% (95% CI, 75-89), and 93% (95% CI, 86-96), respectively. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities were neutropenia (33%) and lymphocytopenia (16%). Six patients experienced treatment-related serious adverse events, including fever of unknown origin, sepsis, pneumonia, respiratory failure, severe cerebellar ataxia, and fatal acute myeloid leukemia. The trial showed that subcutaneous rituximab did not improve the complete remission rate at the conclusion of the induction phase, which was the main endpoint. Nevertheless, SC maintenance might have facilitated long-term disease control, potentially contributing to enhanced event-free and progression-free survival.

PET/CT Biomarkers Enable Risk Stratification of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Enrolled in the LOTIS-2 Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

Significant progress has occurred in developing quantitative PET/CT biomarkers in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Total metabolic tumor volume (MTV) is the most extensively studied, enabling assessment of FDG-avid tumor burden associated with outcomes. However, prior studies evaluated the outcome of cytotoxic chemotherapy or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy without data on recently approved FDA agents. Therefore, we aimed to assess the prognosis of PET/CT biomarkers in patients treated with loncastuximab tesirine.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We centrally reviewed screening PET/CT scans of patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL enrolled in the LOTIS-2 (NCT03589469) study. MTV was obtained by computing individual volumes using the SUV ≥4.0 threshold. Other PET/CT metrics, clinical factors, and the International Metabolic Prognostic Index (IMPI) were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between biomarkers and treatment response. Cox regression was used to determine the effect of biomarkers on time-to-event outcomes. We estimated biomarker prediction as continuous and binary variables defined by cutoff points.

RESULTS

Across 138 patients included in this study, MTV with a cutoff point of 96 mL was the biomarker associated with the highest predictive performance in univariable and multivariable models to predict failure to achieve complete metabolic response (OR, 5.42; P = 0.002), progression-free survival (HR, 2.68; P = 0.002), and overall survival (HR, 3.09; P < 0.0001). IMPI demonstrated an appropriate performance, however, not better than MTV alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment MTV demonstrated robust risk stratification, with those patients demonstrating high MTV achieving lower responses and survival to loncastuximab tesirine in relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

The ATR inhibitor elimusertib exhibits anti-lymphoma activity and synergizes with the PI3K inhibitor copanlisib

The DNA damage response (DDR) is the cellular process of preserving an intact genome and is often deregulated in lymphoma cells. The ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase is a crucial factor of DDR in the response to DNA single-strand breaks. ATR inhibitors are agents that have shown considerable clinical potential in this context. We characterized the activity of the ATR inhibitor elimusertib (BAY 1895344) in a large panel of lymphoma cell lines. Furthermore, we evaluated its activity combined with the clinically approved PI3K inhibitor copanlisib in vitro and in vivo. Elimusertib exhibits potent anti-tumour activity across various lymphoma subtypes, which is associated with the expression of genes related to replication stress, cell cycle regulation and, as also sustained by CRISPR Cas9 experiments, CDKN2A loss. In several tumour models, elimusertib demonstrated widespread anti-tumour activity stronger than ceralasertib, another ATR inhibitor. This activity is present in both DDR-proficient and DDR-deficient lymphoma models. Furthermore, a combination of ATR and PI3K inhibition by treatment with elimusertib and copanlisib has in vitro and in vivo anti-tumour activity, providing a potential new treatment option for lymphoma patients.

How to integrate CD19 specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells with other CD19 targeting agents in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma?

About one third of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a relapsing/refractory (R/R) disease after first line chemo-immunotherapy, with particularly poor outcomes observed in patients with primary refractory disease and early relapse. CD19 specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a game changer that results in durable and complete response rates in almost half of the patients with R/R DLBCL. Other emerging CD19-targeting therapies include monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies and targeting antibody-drug conjugates, which also show encouraging results. However, the timing and sequencing of different anti-CD19-targeting agents and how they might interfere with subsequent CAR T cell treatment is still unclear. In this review, we summarize the results of the pivotal clinical trials as well as evidence from real-world series of the use of different CD19-targeting approved agents. We discuss the effect of various therapies on CD19 expression and its implications for treatment sequencing.

PI3Kδ activation, IL6 over-expression, and CD37 loss cause resistance to the targeting of CD37-positive lymphomas with the antibody-drug conjugate naratuximab emtansine

Purpose

The transmembrane protein CD37 is expressed almost exclusively in lymphoid tissues, with the highest abundance in mature B cells. CD37-directed antibody- and, more recently, cellular-based approaches have shown preclinical and promising early clinical activity. Naratuximab emtansine (Debio 1562, IMGN529) is an antibodydrug conjugate (ADC) that incorporates an anti-CD37 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the maytansinoid DM1 as payload. Naratuximab emtansine has shown activity as a single agent and in combination with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab in B cell lymphoma patients.

Experimental Design

We assessed the activity of naratuximab emtansine using in vitro models of lymphomas, correlated its activity with CD37 expression levels, characterized two resistance mechanisms to the ADC, and identified combination partners providing synergy.

Results

The anti-tumor activity of naratuximab emtansine was tested in 54 lymphoma cell lines alongside its free payload. The median IC 50 of naratuximab emtansine was 780 pM, and the activity, primarily cytotoxic, was more potent in B than in T cell lymphoma cell lines. In the subgroup of cell lines derived from B cell lymphoma, there was some correlation between sensitivity to DM1 and sensitivity to naratuximab emtansine (r=0.28, P = 0.06). After prolonged exposure to the ADC, one diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell line developed resistance to the ADC due to the biallelic loss of the CD37 gene. After CD37 loss, we also observed upregulation of IL6 (IL-6) and other transcripts from MYD88/IL6-signaling. Recombinant IL6 led to resistance to naratuximab emtansine, while the anti-IL6 antibody tocilizumab improved the cytotoxic activity of the ADC in CD37-positive cells. In a second model, resistance was sustained by an activating mutation in the PIK3CD gene, associated with increased sensitivity to PI3K δ inhibition and a switch from functional dependence on the anti-apoptotic protein MCL1 to reliance on BCL2. The addition of idelalisib or venetoclax to naratuximab emtansine overcame resistance to the ADC in the resistant derivative while also improving the cytotoxic activity of the ADC in the parental cells.

Conclusions

Targeting B cell lymphoma with the CD37 targeting ADC naratuximab emtansine showed vigorous anti-tumor activity as a single agent, which was also observed in models bearing genetic lesions associated with inferior outcomes, such as MYC translocations and TP53 inactivation or resistance to R-CHOP. Resistance DLBCL models identified active combinations of naratuximab emtansine with drugs targeting IL6, PI3K δ , and BCL2. Despite notable progress in recent decades, we still face challenges in achieving a cure for a substantial number of lymphoma patients (1,2). A pertinent example is diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most prevalent type of lymphoma (3). More than half of DLBCL patients can achieve remission, but around 40% of them experience refractory disease or relapse following an initial positive response (3). Regrettably, the prognosis for many of these cases remains unsatisfactory despite introducing the most recent antibody-based or cellular therapies (3,4), underscoring the importance of innovating new therapeutic strategies and gaining insights into the mechanisms of therapy resistance. CD37 is a transmembrane glycoprotein belonging to the tetraspanin family, primarily expressed on the surface of immune cells, principally in mature B cells but also, at lower levels, in T cells, macrophages/monocytes, granulocytes and dendritic cells (5) (6-8). CD37 plays a crucial role in various immune functions, including B cell activation, proliferation, and signaling, although its precise role still needs to be fully elucidated. CD37 interacts with multiple molecules, including SYK, LYN, CD19, CD22, PI3K δ , PI3K γ , and different integrins, among others (6-8). In mice, the lack of CD37 is paired with reduced T cell-dependent antibody-secreting cells and memory B cells, apparently due to the loss of CD37-mediated clustering of α 4 β 1 integrins (VLA-4) on germinal center B cells and decreased downstream activation of PI3K/AKT signaling and cell survival (5). Reflecting the expression pattern observed in normal lymphocytes, CD37 exhibits elevated expression in all mature B-cell lymphoid neoplasms, including most lymphoma subtypes, and absence in early progenitor cells or terminally differentiated plasma cells (6,8-14). In DLBCL, CD37 expression has been reported between 40% and 90% of cases across multiple studies performed using different antibodies (10,14-16). CD37-directed antibody- and, more recently, cellular-based approaches have shown preclinical (7,10-14,17-23) and early promising clinical activity (24-32). Among the CD37-targeting agents, naratuximab emtansine (Debio 1562, IMGN529) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that incorporates the anti-CD37 humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody K7153A conjugated to the maytansinoid DM1, as payload, via the thioether linker, N-succinimidyl-4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (SMCC) (10). Based on the initial in vitro and in vivo evidence of anti-tumor activity in lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (7,10), naratuximab emtansine entered the clinical evaluation as a single agent. The phase 1 study exploring naratuximab emtansine enrolled 39 patients with relapsed/refractory B cell lymphoma (27). The overall response rate (ORR) was 13% across all patients and 22% in DLBCL patients, including the only observed complete remission (CR) (27). In preliminary results of a phase 2 trial exploring the combination of naratuximab emtansine with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (18), based on positive preclinical data (18), the ORR was 45% in 76 patients with DLBCL with 24 CRs (32%), 57% in 14 patients with follicular lymphoma (five CR), 50% in four MCL patients (2 CR) (31). Here, we studied the pattern of activity of naratuximab emtansine across a large panel of cell lines derived from DLBCL and other lymphoma subtypes and characterized two resistance mechanisms to the ADC.

Targeting myeloid chemotaxis to reverse prostate cancer therapy resistance

Inflammation is a hallmark of cancer1. In patients with cancer, peripheral blood myeloid expansion, indicated by a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, associates with shorter survival and treatment resistance across malignancies and therapeutic modalities2-5. Whether myeloid inflammation drives progression of prostate cancer in humans remain unclear. Here we show that inhibition of myeloid chemotaxis can reduce tumour-elicited myeloid inflammation and reverse therapy resistance in a subset of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We show that a higher blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio reflects tumour myeloid infiltration and tumour expression of senescence-associated mRNA species, including those that encode myeloid-chemoattracting CXCR2 ligands. To determine whether myeloid cells fuel resistance to androgen receptor signalling inhibitors, and whether inhibiting CXCR2 to block myeloid chemotaxis reverses this, we conducted an investigator-initiated, proof-of-concept clinical trial of a CXCR2 inhibitor (AZD5069) plus enzalutamide in patients with metastatic CRPC that is resistant to androgen receptor signalling inhibitors. This combination was well tolerated without dose-limiting toxicity and it decreased circulating neutrophil levels, reduced intratumour CD11b+HLA-DRloCD15+CD14- myeloid cell infiltration and imparted durable clinical benefit with biochemical and radiological responses in a subset of patients with metastatic CRPC. This study provides clinical evidence that senescence-associated myeloid inflammation can fuel metastatic CRPC progression and resistance to androgen receptor blockade. Targeting myeloid chemotaxis merits broader evaluation in other cancers.

A Phase I Study of the Pan-Notch Inhibitor CB-103 for Patients with Advanced Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma and Other Tumors

PURPOSE

CB-103 selectively inhibits the CSL-NICD (Notch intracellular domain) interaction leading to transcriptional downregulation of oncogenic Notch pathway activation. This dose-escalation/expansion study aimed to determine safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients ≥18 years of age with selected advanced solid tumors [namely, adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC)] and hematologic malignancies were eligible. CB-103 was dosed orally in cycles of 28 days at escalating doses until disease progression. Notch-activating mutations were required in a dose confirmatory cohort. Endpoints included dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), safety, tumor response, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Exploratory analyses focused on correlates of Notch and target gene expression.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients (64, 12 dose-escalation cohorts; 15, confirmatory cohort) enrolled with 54% receiving two or more lines of prior therapy. ACC was the dominant tumor type (40, 51%). Two DLTs were observed [elevated gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), visual change]; recommended phase II dose was declared as 500 mg twice daily (5 days on, 2 days off weekly). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 15 patients (19%), including elevated liver function tests (LFTs), anemia, and visual changes. Five (6%) discontinued drug for toxicity; with no drug-related deaths. There were no objective responses, but 37 (49%) had stable disease; including 23 of 40 (58%) patients with ACC. In the ACC cohort, median progression-free survival was 2.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.5-3.7] and median overall survival was 18.4 months (95% CI, 6.3-not reached).

CONCLUSIONS

CB-103 had a manageable safety profile and biological activity but limited clinical antitumor activity as monotherapy in this first-in-human study.

SIGNIFICANCE

CB-103 is a novel oral pan-Notch inhibitor that selectively blocks the CSL-NICD interaction leading to transcriptional downregulation of oncogenic Notch pathway activation. This first-in-human dose-escalation and -confirmation study aimed to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor efficacy of CB-103. We observed a favorable safety profile with good tolerability and biological activity but limited clinical single-agent antitumor activity. Some disease stabilization was observed among an aggressive NOTCH-mutant ACC type-I subgroup where prognosis is poor and therapies are critically needed. Peripheral downregulation of select Notch target gene levels was observed with escalating doses. Future studies exploring CB-103 should enrich for patients with NOTCH-mutant ACC and investigate rational combinatorial approaches in tumors where there is limited success with investigational or approved drugs.

Prognostic implication of PD-L1 in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective single-centre study

BACKGROUND

The prognostic role of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in patients with localised and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer has not been fully elucidated. This information could help to better interpret recent and upcoming results of phase III adjuvant or neoadjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy studies.

METHODS

In a cohort of 146 patients with early or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with curative intent (by surgery or radiotherapy), we investigated the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression and its correlation with other biological and clinical features. PD-L1 expression was stratified by quartiles. Primary endpoints were overall and disease-free survival. We also analysed the prognostic impact of the presence of actionable mutations, implemented treatment modality and completion of the treatment plan. Neither type of patient received neoadjuvant or adjuvant immunotherapy or target therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 146 selected patients, 32 (21.9%) presented disease progression and 15 died (10.3%) at a median follow-up of 20 months. In a univariable analysis, PD-L1 expression ≥25% was associated with significantly lower disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]) 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-3.9, p = 0.049). PD-L1 expression ≥50% did not lead to disease-free survival or overall survival benefits (HR 1.2 and 1.1, respectively; 95% CI 0.6-2.6 and 0.3-3.4, respectively; pnot significant). In a multivariate analysis, a stage >I (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-6, p = 0.012) and having an inoperable tumour (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.4, p = 0.005) were associated with lower disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

The population of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer and PD-L1 expression ≥25% who were treated with curative intent during the pre-immunotherapy era exhibited a worse prognosis. This finding provides justification for the utilisation of adjuvant immunotherapy in this subgroup of patients, based on the current evidence derived from disease-free survival outcomes. However, for patients with PD-L1 expression <25%, opting to wait for the availability of the overall survival results may be a prudent choice.

Results of an open-label phase 1b study of the ERK inhibitor MK-8353 plus the MEK inhibitor selumetinib in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors

AIM

We evaluated MK-8353 (small molecule inhibitor of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2) plus selumetinib (mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 inhibitor) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

This phase 1b, open-label, dose-escalation study (NCT03745989) enrolled adults with histologically/cytologically documented, locally advanced/metastatic solid tumors. MK-8353/selumetinib dose combinations were intended to be investigated in sequence: 50/25, 100/50, 150/75, 200/75, 200/100, and 250/100. Each agent was administered orally BID 4 days on/3 days off in repeating cycles every 21 days. Primary objectives were safety and tolerability and to establish preliminary recommended phase 2 doses for combination therapy.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled. Median (range) age was 61.5 (26-78) years and 93% had received previous cancer therapy. Among 28 patients in the dose-limiting toxicities [DLT]-evaluable population, 8 experienced DLTs: 1/11 (9%) in the MK-8353/selumetinib 100/50-mg dose level experienced a grade 3 DLT (urticaria), and 7/14 (50%) in the 150/75-mg dose level experienced grade 2/3 DLTs (n = 2 each of blurred vision, retinal detachment, vomiting; n = 1 each of diarrhea, macular edema, nausea, retinopathy). The DLT rate in the latter dose level exceeded the prespecified target DLT rate (~30%). Twenty-six patients (87%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (grade 3, 30%; no grade 4/5), most commonly diarrhea (67%), nausea (37%), and acneiform dermatitis (33%). Three patients (10%) experienced treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. Best response was stable disease in 14 patients (n = 10 with MK-8353/selumetinib 150/75 mg).

CONCLUSION

MK-8353/selumetinib 50/25 mg and 100/50 mg had acceptable safety and tolerability, whereas 150/75 mg was not tolerable. No responses were observed.

Abstract 394: ERBB4-mediated signaling is a mediator of resistance to BTK and PI3K inhibitors in B cell lymphoid neoplasms

Background: Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is an indolent yet incurable B cell malignancy. Two BTK inhibitors, ibrutinib and zanubrutinib, are FDA approved for relapsed/refractory MZL patients. PI3K inhibitors have also shown clinical activity. The identification of the mechanisms of resistance can provide useful information to optimize the use of the agents. We previously reported an IL6 driven MZL model of PI3K inhibitors resistance developed by prolonged exposure to the PI3Kδ inhibitor idelalisib (Arribas, Haematologica 2022). Here, we present the detailed characterization of a second model with resistance to both BTK and PI3K inhibitors.

Methods: MTT assay. RNA-Seq, whole exome sequencing, miRNA and methylation profiling. FACS and ELISA analyses.

Results: Resistant cells, developed by continuous exposure of the cell line Karpas1718 to idelalisib, showed resistance to various inhibitors of BTK (ibrutinib, zanubrutinib, acalabrutinib and pirtobrutinib) and PI3K (idelalisib, duvelisib, copanlisib and umbralisib). No mutations affecting BTK, PLCG2 or CXCR4 were identified in resistant cells, which had higher expression of genes involved in ERBB signaling (HBEGF, NRG2, ERBB4), cell proliferation (PBK, MKI67, TCL1A) and DNA recombination (RAG1, RAG2) than parental cells. We confirmed cell surface ERBB4 up-regulation, and the cytoplasmatic expression and secretion of its ligand HBEGF in resistant cells, which led to increased levels of p-AKT and p-ERK. The miRNAs miR-29c and let-7c, known negative regulators of the HBEGF-ERBB axis, were fully methylated and down-regulated in resistant compared to parental cells. ERBB4 genetic silencing improved sensitivity to PI3Kδ inhibitor, and exposure to let-7c or miR-29c mimics decreased secreted HBEGF and recovered sensitivity to PI3K inhibitors in resistant cells. Addition of recombinant HBEGF (rHBEGF) induced resistance to BTK and to PI3K inhibitors in parental cells and in other lymphoma models including mantle cell lymphomas and diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCL). The rHBEGF induced resistance was reverted adding the ERBB inhibitor lapatinib. To extend our findings to the clinical context, using two MZL and one DLBCL expression datasets, we showed HBEGF and ERBB4 expression in clinical specimens. Finally, HBEGF levels appeared elevated in the serum of CLL patients with primary or acquired resistance to PI3Kδ or to BTK inhibitors, compared to patients responding to the drugs and paired for similar clinical features.

Conclusions: We characterized a novel B cell lymphoma model of secondary resistance to BTK and PI3K inhibitors. Our results indicate that epigenetic plasticity led to the activation of HBEGF-ERBB signaling sustaining resistance to BTK/PI3K inhibitors, which can be overcome using epigenetic agents and ERBB inhibitors. These therapeutics approaches could be tested in novel clinical trials. AJA, SN: equally contributed.

Citation Format: Alberto J. Arribas, Sara Napoli, Luciano Cascione, Laura Barnabei, Giulio Sartori, Eleonora Cannas, Eugenio Gaudio, Chiara Tarantelli, Afua A. Mensah, Filippo Spriano, Antonella Zucchetto, Francesca M. Rossi, Andrea Rinaldi, Manuel Castro de Moura, Anastasios Stathis, Georg Stussi, Valter Gattei, Jennifer R. Brown, Manel Esteller, Emanuele Zucca, Davide Rossi, Francesco Bertoni. ERBB4-mediated signaling is a mediator of resistance to BTK and PI3K inhibitors in B cell lymphoid neoplasms [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 394.

Safety and anti-tumor activity of lisavanbulin administered as 48-hour infusion in patients with ovarian cancer or recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 2a study

PURPOSE

 Lisavanbulin (BAL101553) is the prodrug of avanbulin (BAL27862), a microtubule-destabilizing agent. The goal of this study (NCT02895360) was to characterize the safety, tolerability and antitumor activity of lisavanbulin administered as a 48-hour intravenous (IV) infusion at the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 70 mg/m². Results from the Phase 1 dose-escalation portion of the study identifying the RP2D have been previously reported. Here, we present the findings from the Phase 2a portion of this study. Methods. This multi-center, open-label study included patients with ovarian, fallopian-tube, or primary peritoneal cancer that was either platinum-resistant or refractory (11 patients), or with first recurrence of glioblastoma (12 patients). Lisavanbulin was administered as a 48-hour IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Results. Lisavanbulin was well tolerated in both patient cohorts. Thirteen patients (56.5%) developed 49 adverse events assessed as related to study treatment. The majority were mild or moderate; four were grade 3/4. Sixteen SAEs were reported in nine patients (39.1%), with none considered related to study treatment. No AEs led to permanent treatment discontinuation. Three patients in the ovarian cancer cohort had stable disease with lesion size reductions after two cycles of treatment; in the glioblastoma cohort, one patient showed partial response with a > 90% glioblastoma area reduction as best response, and one patient had stable disease after eight cycles of treatment. Conclusion. This study demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile of 48-hour continuous IV infusion of lisavanbulin in patients with solid extracranial tumors or glioblastoma. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT02895360.

ERBB4-mediated signaling is a mediator of resistance to BTK and PI3K inhibitors in B cell lymphoid neoplasms

BTK and PI3K inhibitors are among the drugs approved for the treatment of patients with lymphoid neoplasms. Although active, their ability to lead as single agents to long-lasting complete remission is rather limited especially in the lymphoma setting. This indicates that tumor cells often develop resistance to the drugs. Here, we show that the overexpression of ERBB4 and its ligands represents a modality for B cell neoplastic cells to bypass the anti-tumor activity of BTK and PI3K inhibitors and that targeted pharmacological interventions can restore sensitivity to the small molecules. We started from a marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) cell line, Karpas-1718, kept under prolonged exposure to the PI3Kδ inhibitor idelalisib until acquisition of resistance, or with no drug. Cells underwent transcriptome, miRNA and methylation profiling, whole exome sequencing, and pharmacological screening which led to the identification of the overexpression of ERBB4 and its ligands HBEGF and NRG2 in the resistant cells. Cellular and genetic experiments demonstrated the involvement of this axis in blocking the anti-tumor activity of various BTK and PI3K inhibitors, currently used in the clinical setting. Addition of recombinant HBEGF induced resistance to BTK and PI3K inhibitors in parental cells but also in additional lymphoma models. Combination with the ERBB inhibitor lapatinib was beneficial in resistant cells and in other lymphoma models already expressing the identified resistance factors. Multi-omics analysis underlined that an epigenetic reprogramming affected the expression of the resistance-related factors, and pretreatment with demethylating agents or EZH2 inhibitors overcame the resistance. Resistance factors were shown to be expressed in clinical samples, further extending the findings of the study. In conclusions, we identified a novel ERBB4-driven mechanism of resistance to BTK and PI3K inhibitors and treatments that appear to overcome it.

Key points

A mechanism of secondary resistance to the PI3Kδ and BTK inhibitors in B cell neoplasms driven by secreted factors.Resistance can be reverted by targeting ERBB signaling.

Oncology phase I trial design and conduct: time for a change - MDICT Guidelines 2022

In 2021, the Food and Drug Administration Oncology Center of Excellence announced Project Optimus focusing on dose optimization for oncology drugs. The Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies (MDICT) Taskforce met to review and discuss the optimization of dosage for oncology trials and to develop a practical guide for oncology phase I trials. Defining a single recommended phase II dose based on toxicity may define doses that are neither the most effective nor the best tolerated. MDICT recommendations address the need for robust non-clinical data which are needed to inform trial design, as well as an expert team including statisticians and pharmacologists. The protocol must be flexible and adaptive, with clear definition of all endpoints. Health authorities should be consulted early and regularly. Strategies such as randomization, intrapatient dose escalation, and real-world eligibility criteria are encouraged whereas serial tumor sampling is discouraged in the absence of a strong rationale and appropriately validated assay. Endpoints should include consideration of all longitudinal toxicity. The phase I dose escalation trial should define the recommended dose range for later testing in randomized phase II trials, rather than a single recommended phase II dose, and consider scenarios where different populations may require different dosages. The adoption of these recommendations will improve dosage selection in early clinical trials of new anticancer treatments and ultimately, outcomes for patients.

Zandelisib with continuous or intermittent dosing as monotherapy or in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancy: a multicentre, first-in-patient, dose-escalation and dose-expansion, phase 1b trial

BACKGROUND

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase p110δ (PI3Kδ) inhibitors are efficacious in B-cell malignancies. Immune-related adverse events might be mitigated with intermittent dosing. We aimed to evaluate the safety and antitumour activity of zandelisib, a potent novel PI3Kδ inhibitor, with continuous or intermittent dosing as monotherapy or in combination with rituximab, in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancy.

METHODS

We conducted a first-in-patient, dose-escalation and dose-expansion, phase 1b trial at ten treatment centres across Switzerland and the USA. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancy (limited to follicular lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia during dose escalation) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had received at least one previous line of therapy and no previous PI3Kδ inhibitor treatment. In the dose-escalation study, participants received oral zandelisib once daily (60 mg, 120 mg, or 180 mg; we did not evaluate four additional planned dose levels). The 60 mg dose was further evaluated as monotherapy or with intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 3-6, using a continuous daily schedule or intermittent dosing therapy (days 1-28 of cycles 1-2 and days 1-7 of subsequent cycles) in 28-day cycles. Treatment was continued until evidence of disease progression, intolerance, or withdrawal of consent by the patient. Primary endpoints were safety (dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose), minimum biologically effective dose, and a composite endpoint to assess the activity of each dose level, and were analysed by intention to treat. The zandelisib monotherapy and zandelisib-rituximab combination cohorts have completed accrual, but accrual to a cohort evaluating zandelisib with zanubrutinib is ongoing. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02914938.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 17, 2016, and June 2, 2020, 100 patients were assessed for eligibility and 97 were enrolled and received zandelisib monotherapy (n=56) or zandelisib plus rituximab (n=41), with zandelisib administered on either a continuous schedule (n=38) or with intermittent dosing (n=59). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, the objective of determining the maximum tolerated dose was abandoned, and antitumour activity was similar across the evaluated doses activity (objective responses in 11 [92%; 95% CI 61·5-99·8] of 12 patients at both 60 mg and 120 mg doses, and in five [83%; 95% CI 35·9-99·6] of six patients at 180 mg). With a median duration of exposure of 15·2 months (IQR 3·7-21·7), the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutrophil count decrease (ten [17%] of 59 patients in the intermittent dosing group and four [11%] of 38 in the continuous dosing group), diarrhoea (three [5%] and eight [21%]), pneumonia (one [2%] and six [16%]), alanine aminotransferase increase (three [5%] and two [5%]), and colitis (two [3%] and one [3%]). 26 (44%) of 59 patients in the intermittent dosing group and 29 (76%) of 38 patients in the continuous dosing group had grade 3-4 adverse events. Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in eight (21%) patients in the continuous dosing group and five (8%) patients in the intermittent dosing group. There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Zandelisib 60 mg once daily on an intermittent dosing schedule was safe, with low frequency of grade 3 or worse adverse events, warranting the ongoing global phase 2 and phase 3 trials.

FUNDING

MEI Pharma.

Pharmacologic screen identifies active combinations with BET inhibitors and LRRK2 as a novel putative target in lymphoma

Inhibitors of the Bromo‐ and Extra‐Terminal domain (BET) family proteins have strong preclinical antitumor activity in multiple tumor models, including lymphomas. Limited single‐agent activity has been reported in the clinical setting. Here, we have performed a pharmacological screening to identify compounds that can increase the antitumor activity of BET inhibitors in lymphomas.

The germinal center B‐cell like diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell lines OCI‐LY‐19 and WSU‐DLCL2 were exposed to 348 compounds given as single agents at two different concentrations and in combination with the BET inhibitor birabresib. The combination partners included small molecules targeting important biologic pathways such as PI3K/AKT/MAPK signaling and apoptosis, approved anticancer agents, kinase inhibitors, epigenetic compounds. The screening identified a series of compounds leading to a stronger antiproliferative activity when given in combination than as single agents: the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors panobinostat and dacinostat, the mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin) inhibitor everolimus, the ABL/SRC (ABL proto‐oncogene/SRC proto oncogene) inhibitor dasatinib, the AKT1/2/3 inhibitor MK‐2206, the JAK2 inhibitor TG101209. The novel finding was the benefit given by the addition of the LRRK2 inhibitor LRRK2‐IN‐1, which was validated in vitro and in vivo. Genetic silencing demonstrated that LRRK2 sustains the proliferation of lymphoma cells, a finding paired with the association between high expression levels and inferior outcome in DLBCL patients.

We identified combinations that can improve the response to BET inhibitors in lymphomas, and LRRK2 as a gene essential for lymphomas and as putative novel target for this type of tumors.

Abstract 1879: A novel implantable device to in vivo assess anti-cancer agents

Background: The high variability in clinical responses observed in cancer patients highlights the need of a tailored therapeutic approach. A possible modality is to assess drugs sensitivity directly in the patients, by introducing small drug delivering devices in tumor sites for a very short period and then looking at the local anti-tumor effect. Here, we present the design of an innovative drug eluting device and its test with the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib as an example of small molecules.

Methods: Mathematical models considered factors related to drug (MW), physical properties, desired concentrations in surrounding tissue, polymers and tissue physical features to identify the optimal polymers and the drug loading for the desired release profile over 24h. In vitro proliferation was measured with the MTT assay, in vivo experiments done in NOD-SCID mice (license TI05/2021), and immunohistochemistry on FFPE xenograft sections stained for Ki67 and cleaved caspase 3 (CASP-3).

Results: Device was designed as an arrow-shaped cylinder, with flat end and flatter sections to be filled with the drug-eluting polymers. Prototypes were built in nylon6,6, a biocompatible but stable polymer. Ibrutinib was incorporated in low MW polyester poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) as biopolymer by solvent casting. Polymeric coating onto devices was done with a dedicated automatic device.Devices loaded with biopolymer and different concentrations of ibrutinib or “empty” biopolymers were first in vitro tested using diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell lines. Over 72h, devices with drug inhibited proliferation of the ibrutinib-sensitive TMD8 and OCI-Ly10 cell lines, but not of the ibrutinib-resistant SU-DHL-2 and U2932. No effect was seen with devices with ibrutinib-free biopolymers. Devices, empty or loaded with ibrutinib (5μg), were then inserted in xenografts of ibrutinib-sensitive cell line OCI-Ly10 and ibrutinib resistant U2932. After 24h, mice were sacrificed and xenografts analyzed. By Ki67 and CASP-3 a reduced cell proliferation and an increased apoptosis in the region surrounding the device was observed in the ibrutinib-sensitive xenografts, conversely nor reduced cell proliferation nor apoptosis induction were identified in the ibrutinib-resistant xenografts.

Conclusions: We have created a prototype of a device that can locally release drugs allowing the evaluation of anti-tumor activity, optimizing cures tailored to single patient. The system can be further developed to include multiple drugs, including e.g. antibodies.

Citation Format: Giuseppe Perale, Eugenio Gaudio, Tommaso Casalini, Luca Aresu, Anna Rita De Corso, Filippo Spriano, Chiara Tarantelli, Anastasios Stathis, Andrea Castrovinci, Francesco Bertoni. A novel implantable device to in vivo assess anti-cancer agents [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1879.

Abstract CT006: Phase Ib expansion trial of the safety and efficacy of the oral ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor elimusertib in advanced solid tumors with DNA damage response (DDR) defects

Introduction: ATR kinase is a critical component of DDR machinery and is activated by DNA damage or replication stress. Elimusertib is a selective ATR inhibitor with promising antitumor activity in pts with advanced solid tumors with ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) protein loss and/or ATM putative deleterious alterations (Yap et al. Cancer Discov 2021). We report here the safety and efficacy of elimusertib in expansion cohorts of pts with a range of cancer types and DDR deficiencies and/or ATM loss. We also explored an alternative dose schedule in pts with ATM aberrations.

Methods: Pts with advanced solid tumors resistant or refractory to standard treatment were screened for pathogenic DDR defects by next-generation sequencing or ATM protein loss by immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis of baseline tumor tissue. Pts were assigned to cohorts: colorectal cancer (CRC); castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC); HER2− breast cancer (BC); gynecologic (GYN, mainly ovarian and endometrial); and advanced cancers with ATM IHC loss. Pts were treated with elimusertib 40 mg twice daily (BID) 3 days on/4 days off (3 on/4 off). A schedule of 3 on/11 off was also explored by dose escalation in pts with ATM loss or inactivating mutation.

Results: 143 pts received ≥1 dose of elimusertib 40 mg BID 3 on/4 off, including 24 CRC, 19 CRPC, 19 BC, 45 GYN, and 36 ATM loss. 56% of pts had ≥4 prior therapy lines. Drug-related grade 3 and 4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in 69% and 15% of pts, respectively, mainly anemia, leukopenia/neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia leading to dose modification but not withdrawal. 32 pts were treated 3 on/11 off with doses from 60 to 120 mg BID. Compared with 3 on/4 off, drug-related grade ≥3 hematologic TEAEs and dose modifications improved at lower doses, with 80 mg 3 on/11 off determined as the recommended dose. In pts receiving elimusertib 3 on/4 off, 5 RECIST partial responses were observed: 1 in ovarian (BRCA1 heterozygous mutation), 1 in BC (BRCA2 mutation), and 3 in ATM IHC loss: 2 CRPC pts both with ATM mutations (1 heterozygous, 1 homozygous), including 1 with FANCA mutation; 1 esophageal with ATM mutation. In pts with ATM IHC loss, objective response rate (ORR) was 9% and disease control rate (DCR) was 65%. A similar ORR was seen on 3 on/11 off in pts with ATM aberrations. In GYN pts, ORR was 2.3% and DCR was 73%.

Conclusions: Elimusertib monotherapy demonstrated clinical activity in pts with DDR defects. Overall safety was manageable and hematologic toxicity improved on the 3 on/11 off schedule. Further biomarker analysis is underway to identify potential gene signatures associated with response. Clinical development of elimusertib in combination with checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy is ongoing (NCT04095273, NCT04514497).

Citation Format: Timothy A. Yap, David S. Tan, Anastasios Stathis, Geoffrey I. Shapiro, Satoru Iwasa, Markus Joerger, Jingsong Zhang, Ruth Plummer, Michael Sawyer, Aaron C. Tan, Vincent Castonguay, Nashat Gabrail, Nobuaki Matsubara, Gary Wilkinson, Matthias Ludwig, Yinghui Zhou, Claudia Merz, Joseph Hreiki, Neelesh Sharma, Johan deBono. Phase Ib expansion trial of the safety and efficacy of the oral ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor elimusertib in advanced solid tumors with DNA damage response (DDR) defects [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT006.

Report of the First International Symposium on NUT Carcinoma

NUT carcinoma is a rare, aggressive cancer defined by rearrangements of the NUTM1 gene. No routinely effective treatments of NUT carcinoma exist, despite harboring a targetable oncoprotein, most commonly BRD4-NUT. The vast majority of cases are fatal. Poor awareness of the disease is a major obstacle to progress in the treatment of NUT carcinoma. While the incidence likely exceeds that of Ewing sarcoma, and BRD4-NUT heralded the bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (BET) inhibitor class of selective epigenetic modulators, NUT carcinoma is incorrectly perceived as "impossibly rare," and therefore receives comparatively little private or governmental funding or prioritization by pharma. To raise awareness, propagate scientific knowledge, and initiate a consensus on standard and targeted treatment of NUT carcinoma, we held the First International Symposium on NUT Carcinoma on March 3, 2021. This virtual event had more than eighty attendees from the Americas, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Patients with NUT carcinoma and family members were represented and shared perspectives. Broadly, the four areas discussed by experts in the field included (1) the biology of NUT carcinoma; (2) standard approaches to the treatment of NUT carcinoma; (3) results of clinical trials using BET inhibitors; and (4) future directions, including novel BET bromodomain inhibitors, combinatorial approaches, and immunotherapy. It was concluded that standard chemotherapeutic approaches and first-generation BET bromodomain inhibitors, the latter complicated by a narrow therapeutic window, are only modestly effective in a minority of cases. Nonetheless, emerging second-generation targeted inhibitors, novel rational synergistic combinations, and the incorporation of immuno-oncology approaches hold promise to improve the prognosis of this disease.

TLD-1, a novel liposomal doxorubicin, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors: Dose escalation and expansion part of a multicenter open-label phase I trial (SAKK 65/16)

3027

Background: TLD-1 is a novel liposomal doxorubicin that compared favorably to conventional liposomal formulations of doxorubicin in preclinical in vivo mouse breast cancer models. This phase I first-in-human trial is aiming to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics and preliminary activity. Methods: Patients with a maximum of 3 prior lines of systemic chemotherapy and preferably anthracycline-sensitive disease were eligible. TLD-1 was administered on day 1 iv over 60-90 minutes (depending on individual dose) q 21 days, for up to 6 or 9 cycles (according to prior anthracycline-exposure) with premedication of 8mg dexamethasone. Dose escalation with dose levels (DL) 1-7 of 10, 16, 23, 30, 35, 40 and 45mg/m2 started with an accelerated titration design, treating one pt at each DL up to DL6 (40mg/m2) followed by a modified continual reassessment method at DL7 due to observed toxicity. Results: 30 pts (F:M = 24:6) have been treated, one each at DLs 1-6, 15 pts at DL7 and an additional 9 pts at DL6. Most frequent tumor types included breast (n = 13), ovarian (n = 6), cervical cancer (n = 2) and cholangiocarcinoma (n = 2). Median age was 67.5 years (range:38-83), 13 pts were exposed to prior anthracyclines. The median number of cycles was 4 (range:1-9). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) occurred during cycle 1. At DLs 1 to 5, no treatment-related G3 AEs (TRAE) were observed. At DL6, there was one case of mucositis G3, one of palmar-plantar-erythrodysesthesia (PPE) G3 and one of anemia and neutropenia G3 each. One patient with pre-existing valvular cardiopathy developed symptoms of heart-failure G3 after 8 cycles. Echocardiography showed severe mitral regurgitation with normal LV-EF. In addition one case of urinary-tract infection G3 was seen. Dose-modifications or -delays due to AEs occurred in 7/50 cycles. At DL7, one case of mucositis G3, 3 events of PPE G3 and one case of fatigue G3 were reported. In addition, one case of infection with shingles occurred. Dose-modifications or -delays due to AEs occurred in 12/61 cycles. Shingles and heart failure were reported as SAEs. All toxicities listed above were categorized as TRAE. 29/30 pts were evaluable for response. Three breast cancer pts had a partial response, 2 at DL7 and 1 at DL6, 14 pts had stable disease. Conclusions: No DLT was observed up to DL7. RP2D was defined at 40mg/m2 due to cumulative PPE G3 at DL7. The trial is ongoing with a comparative PK-part evaluating the two iv liposomal formulations of doxorubicin TLD-1 and Caelyx. Clinical trial information: NCT03387917.

A phase 1 dose-finding and dose-expansion study evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of a highly selective WEE1 inhibitor (Debio 0123) in adult patients with advanced solid tumors

TPS2702

Background: Debio 0123 is an oral, highly selective inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase WEE1. WEE1 is a key regulator of cell cycle progression that modulates the activity of CDK1 (CDC2), influencing entry into mitosis. WEE1 inhibition results in G2 checkpoint abrogation, triggering mitosis with unrepaired DNA leading to cell death. In vitro and in vivo tumor models have shown Debio 0123 antitumor activity. Continuous exposure seems to be needed to maximize monotherapy efficacy in preclinical models. Preliminary data from an ongoing phase 1 study of intermittent Debio 0123 combined with carboplatin, showed a manageable safety profile, and signals of antitumor activity in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. We present the design of a phase 1 study (NCT05109975) of continuous Debio 0123 administered as a single agent in pts with advanced solid tumors. Methods: The study comprises a dose escalation part and a dose expansion part. The primary objective of the dose escalation part of the study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of continuous Debio 0123 monotherapy in adults with previously treated advanced solid tumors. Key secondary objectives include characterization of safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary antitumor activity (overall response rate [ORR]). Key inclusion criteria are histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, and ECOG-PS 0 or 1. Key exclusion criteria are asymptomatic or unstable brain metastases, history of cardiac disorders, inability to swallow oral medication or abnormalities affecting drug absorption. Approximately 30 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT)-evaluable pts are anticipated to be enrolled based on an escalation with overdose control (EWOC) approach for 21-day treatment cycles. When the pts of each cohort become evaluable, a safety monitoring committee will review safety and tolerability and based on EWOC recommendations will decide the next dose level or will declare the MTD and/or RP2D. Pharmacodynamic biomarkers will be correlated with tumor response and/or PK. The dose-expansion part may start after MTD and/or RP2D determination. The primary objective of this part will be to characterize the safety and tolerability (e.g. percentage of pts with DLTs, serious adverse events or discontinuations) of Debio 0123 monotherapy at the MTD/RP2D, and to evaluate the anti-tumor activity (ORR) in pts with selected recurrent/progressive solid tumors. Key inclusion criteria are measurable disease per RECIST 1.1 and specific tumor types. Based on a Simon 2-stage design, up to 34 pts per tumor type cohort may be enrolled. Currently accrual to the dose escalation is ongoing in the United States and Switzerland. Clinical trial information: NCT05109975.

Resistance to PI3κδ inhibitors in marginal zone lymphoma can be reverted by targeting the IL-6/PDGFRA axis

PI3Kδ inhibitors are active in patients with lymphoid neoplasms and a first series of them have been approved for the treatment of multiple types of B-cell lymphoid tumors, including marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). The identification of the mechanisms underlying either primary or secondary resistance is fundamental to optimize the use of novel drugs. Here we present a model of secondary resistance to PI3Kδ inhibitors obtained by prolonged exposure of a splenic MZL cell line to idelalisib. The VL51 cell line was kept under continuous exposure to idelalisib. The study included detailed characterization of the model, pharmacological screens, silencing experiments, and validation experiments on multiple cell lines and on clinical specimens. VL51 developed resistance to idelalisib, copanlisib, duvelisib, and umbralisib. An integrative analysis of transcriptome and methylation data highlighted an enrichment of upregulated transcripts and low-methylated promoters in resistant cells, including IL-6/STAT3- and PDGFRA-related genes and surface CD19 expression, alongside the repression of the let-7 family of miRNA, and miR-125, miR-130, miR-193 and miR-20. The IL-6R blocking antibody to-cilizumab, the STAT3 inhibitor stattic, the LIN28 inhibitor LIN1632, the PDGFR inhibitor masitinib and the anti-CD19 antibody drug conjugate loncastuximab tesirine were active compounds in the resistant cells as single agents and/or in combination with PI3Kδ inhibition. Findings were validated on additional in vitro lymphoma models and on clinical specimens. A novel model of resistance obtained from splenic MZL allowed the identification of therapeutic approaches able to improve the antitumor activity of PI3Kδ inhibitors in B-cell lymphoid tumors.

Outcome and Prognostic Factors of COVID-19 Infection in Swiss Cancer Patients: Final Results of SAKK 80/20 (CaSA)

Purpose: These are the final results of a national registry on cancer patients with COVID-19 in Switzerland. Methods: We collected data on symptomatic COVID-19-infected cancer patients from 23 Swiss sites over a one-year period starting on 1 March 2020. The main objective was to assess the outcome (i.e., mortality, rate of hospitalization, ICU admission) of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients; the main secondary objective was to define prognostic factors. Results: From 455 patients included, 205 patients (45%) had non-curative disease, 241 patients (53%) were hospitalized for COVID-19, 213 (47%) required oxygen, 43 (9%) invasive ventilation and 62 (14%) were admitted to the ICU. Death from COVID-19 infection occurred in 98 patients, resulting in a mortality rate of 21.5%. Age ≥65 years versus <65 years (OR 3.14, p = 0.003), non-curative versus curative disease (OR 2.42, p = 0.012), ICU admission (OR 4.45, p < 0.001) and oxygen requirement (OR 20.28, p < 0.001) were independently associated with increased mortality. Conclusions: We confirmed high COVID-19 severity and mortality in real-world cancer patients during the first and second wave of the pandemic in a country with a decentralized, high-quality, universal-access health care system. COVID-19-associated mortality was particularly high for those of older age in a non-curative disease setting, requiring oxygen or ICU care.

Genetic and phenotypic attributes of splenic marginal zone lymphoma

Splenic marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (SMZL) is a heterogeneous clinico-biological entity. The clinical course is variable, multiple genes are mutated with no unifying mechanism, and essential regulatory pathways and surrounding microenvironments are diverse. We sought to clarify the heterogeneity of SMZL by resolving different subgroups and their underlying genomic abnormalities, pathway signatures, and microenvironment compositions to uncover biomarkers and therapeutic vulnerabilities. We studied 303 SMZL spleen samples collected through the IELSG46 multicenter international study (NCT02945319) by using a multiplatform approach. We carried out genetic and phenotypic analyses, defined self-organized signatures, validated the findings in independent primary tumor metadata and in genetically modified mouse models, and determined correlations with outcome data. We identified 2 prominent genetic clusters in SMZL, termed NNK (58% of cases, harboring NF-κB, NOTCH, and KLF2 modules) and DMT (32% of cases, with DNA-damage response, MAPK, and TLR modules). Genetic aberrations in multiple genes as well as cytogenetic and immunogenetic features distinguished NNK- from DMT-SMZLs. These genetic clusters not only have distinct underpinning biology, as judged by differences in gene-expression signatures, but also different outcomes, with inferior survival in NNK-SMZLs. Digital cytometry and in situ profiling segregated 2 basic types of SMZL immune microenvironments termed immune-suppressive SMZL (50% of cases, associated with inflammatory cells and immune checkpoint activation) and immune-silent SMZL (50% of cases, associated with an immune-excluded phenotype) with distinct mutational and clinical connotations. In summary, we propose a nosology of SMZL that can implement its classification and also aid in the development of rationally targeted treatments.

A phase-II study of atezolizumab in combination with obinutuzumab or rituximab for relapsed or refractory mantle cell or marginal zone lymphoma or Waldenström's macroglobulinemia

We report efficacy, safety and biomarker data from a phase-II study evaluating atezolizumab (eight 21-day cycle as induction therapy) in combination with obinutuzumab in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL, n = 30) or Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM, n = 4), and in combination with rituximab in patients with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL, n = 21). All patients received atezolizumab monotherapy as maintenance for ≤10 cycles. Objective response rates at end of induction were 16.7% (MCL) and 42.9% (MZL), with no responses in WM. Median duration of response was 6.8 months (range 5.7-not estimable) for MCL and not reached for MZL. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 93.3%, 95.2% and 100% of MCL, MZL and WM patients, respectively. One fatal TEAE (pneumonia) occurred in each of the MCL and MZL groups. Biomarker analysis highlighted the importance of characterizing the immune environment to optimize efficacy of immunotherapy regimens.Trial registration details: EudraCT: 2016-003579-22.

Phase I study of lurbinectedin in combination with weekly paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

Lurbinectedin and paclitaxel showed synergism in preclinical studies and have non-completely overlapping toxicity profiles. This phase I trial evaluated a combination of paclitaxel and lurbinectedin with/without bevacizumab in advanced tumors. This trial was divided into Group A, which evaluated weekly paclitaxel (60 or 80 mg) plus lurbinectedin (3.0-5.0 mg flat dose [FD] or 2.2 mg/m²) every 3 weeks in advanced solid tumors; and Group B, which evaluated bevacizumab (BEV, 15 mg/kg) added to the recommended dose (RD) defined in Group A in advanced epithelial ovarian or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 67 patients (A, n = 55; B, n = 12) were treated. The RD was paclitaxel 80 mg/m² on Day (D)1,D8 plus lurbinectedin 2.2 mg/m² on D1. At this RD, myelotoxicity was reversible and manageable, and most non-hematological toxicities were mild/moderate. Adding BEV did not notably change tolerability. Twenty-five confirmed responses were observed: 20/51 evaluable patients in Group A (overall response rate [ORR] = 39% at all dose levels and at the RD), and 5/10 evaluable patients in Group B (ORR = 50%). Most responders had breast (n = 7/12 patients), small cell lung (SCLC) (n = 5/7), epithelial ovarian (n = 3/9) and endometrial cancer (n = 3/11) in Group A, and epithelial ovarian (n = 3/4) and NSCLC (n = 2/6) in Group B. Clinical benefit rate was 61% in Group A (58% at the RD), and 90% in Group B. No major pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions were observed. Paclitaxel/lurbinectedin and paclitaxel/lurbinectedin/BEV are feasible combinations. Further development is warranted of paclitaxel/lurbinectedin in SCLC, breast, and endometrial cancer, and of paclitaxel/lurbinectedin/BEV in epithelial ovarian cancer.

The bromodomain and extra-terminal domain degrader MZ1 exhibits preclinical anti-tumoral activity in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the activated B cell-like type

Aim

Bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (BET) proteins are epigenetic readers that play a fundamental role in transcription regulation. Preclinical and early clinical evidence sustain BET targeting as an anti-cancer approach. BET degraders are chimeric compounds comprising of a BET inhibitor, which allows the binding to BET bromodomains, linked to a small molecule, binder for an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, triggering BET proteins degradation via the proteasome. These degraders, called proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs), can exhibit greater target specificity compared to BET inhibitors and overcome some of their limitations, such as the upregulation of the BET proteins themselves. Here are presented data on the anti-tumor activity and the mechanism of action of the BET degrader MZ1 in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the activated B-cell like (ABC, ABC DLBCL), using a BET inhibitor as a comparison.

Methods

Established lymphoma cell lines were exposed for 72 h to increasing doses of the compounds. Cell proliferation was evaluated by using an 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide (MTT) assay. Fluorescent-Activated Cell Sorter (FACS) analysis was performed to measure apoptotic activation and RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) to study the transcriptional changes induced by the compounds.

Results

MZ1, and not its negative control epimer cisMZ1, was very active with a median half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 49 nmol/L. MZ1 was more in vitro active than the BET inhibitor birabresib (OTX015). Importantly, MZ1 induced cell death in all the ABC DLBCL cell lines, while the BET inhibitor was cytotoxic only in a fraction of them. BET degrader and inhibitor shared partially similar changes at transcriptome level but the MZ1 effect was stronger and overlapped with that caused cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) inhibition.

Conclusions

The BET degrader MZ1 had strong cytotoxic activity in all the ABC DLBCL cell lines that were tested, and, at least in vitro, it elicited more profound effects than BET inhibitors, and encourages further investigations.

Efficacy and Safety Exposure-Response Analysis of Loncastuximab Tesirine in Patients with B cell non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

We developed an integrated population pharmacokinetic model to investigate loncastuximab tesirine pharmacokinetics (PK) and exposure-response relationships for relapsed/refractory B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The model, based on the recommended dosing schedule (150 µg/kg every 3 weeks [Q3W] for 2 cycles; 75 µg/kg Q3W thereafter) and drug concentrations in phase 1 and 2 studies (DLBCL [n = 284], non-DLBCL [n = 44]), was used to characterize loncastuximab tesirine PK and evaluate exposure covariates. Relationships between exposure (pyrrolobenzodiazepine-conjugated antibody [cAb] cycle 1 average concentration) and (1) efficacy (including overall response rate [ORR; primary endpoint] and overall survival [OS]) and (2) grade ≥ 2 treatment-emergent adverse events were explored. Statistical analyses included univariate and multivariate logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazard regression. cAb and total Ab were best described by a two-compartment linear model with time-dependent clearance. The cAb steady-state half-life increased to 20.6 days by ~ 15 weeks. cAb exposure was lower for low albumin, mild/moderate hepatic impairment, non-DLBCL subtypes, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores > 1. Significant positive associations were reported between exposure and ORR (p = 3.21E-6), OS (p = 0.0016), grade ≥ 2 increased gamma-glutamyltransferase, liver function test abnormalities, pain, and skin/nail reactions (p < 0.05). Low albumin, bulky disease, and mild/moderate hepatic impairment had a significant negative effect on OS (p < 0.01). Modeling supports the recommended loncastuximab tesirine dosing schedule. Although reduced exposure and efficacy were predicted for specific covariates (e.g., low albumin, mild/moderate hepatic impairment), dose increases are not recommended. Trial registration: NCT02669017 and NCT03589469.

A systematic review of phase II trials exploring anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combinations in patients with solid tumors

BACKGROUND

A high number of combinations of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with other anti-cancer therapies are in clinical development. The usefulness of phase II trials in evaluating their efficacy and safety is unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic search on PubMed and Cochrane Library for phase II trials of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with other anti-cancer therapies (systemic therapy and/or radiotherapy) published between January 1st 2018 and December 31st 2020. Study design, primary endpoint and main outcomes were registered for each paper.

RESULTS

119 articles reporting on 65 regimens were included in our analysis. Backbone agents were more frequently PD-1 inhibitors (pembrolizumab = 47, nivolumab = 41, camrelizumab = 3) followed by anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab = 19, atezolizumab = 6, avelumab = 3). Therapeutic partners were other immunotherapeutic agents (n = 46), targeted therapies (n = 40), chemotherapy (n = 22) or radiotherapy (n = 11). The majority of articles reported on single-arm trials (n = 87, 73%) and response rate was the most frequent primary endpoint (n = 69, 58%). Objective responses, registered in 109 (92%) articles, ranged between 0% and 91%. The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events, clearly reported in 97 (82%) articles, spanned from 0 to 100%. Five combinations received regulatory approval by Food and Drug Administration or European Medicine Agency for 9 different indications, based on the results of a phase II trial (n = 3) or on a confirmatory phase III trial (n = 6).

CONCLUSIONS

The landscape of phase II trials evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with other anticancer therapies is heterogeneous. Combinations of two immunotherapeutic agents have been the most investigated. Only a minority of indications (8%) granted regulatory approval.

A phase I trial of lurbinectedin in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background In vitro/in vivo data showed synergism of cisplatin and lurbinectedin in ovarian cancer cells and grafts. This phase I trial investigated the recommended phase II dose (RD) of cisplatin and lurbinectedin combination, with (Group A) or without aprepitant (Group B), in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods All patients received 60 mg/m² cisplatin 90-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by lurbinectedin 60-min i.v. infusion at escalating doses on Day 1 every 3 weeks (q3wk). Patients in Group A additionally received orally 125 mg aprepitant one hour before cisplatin on Day 1 and 80 mg on Days 2 and 3. Toxicity was graded according to the NCI-CTCAE v.4. Results RD for Group A was cisplatin 60 mg/m² plus lurbinectedin 1.1 mg/m². RD for Group B was cisplatin 60 mg/m² plus lurbinectedin 1.4 mg/m². The most frequent grade ≥ 3 adverse events were hematological [neutropenia (41%), lymphopenia (35%), leukopenia (24%), thrombocytopenia (18%)] and fatigue (35%) in Group A (n = 17), and neutropenia (50%), leukopenia (42%), lymphopenia (29%), and fatigue (13%) and nausea (8%) in Group B (n = 24). Four patients (2 in each group) had a partial response. Disease stabilization for ≥ 4 months was observed in 4 and 10 patients, respectively. Conclusion The combination of lurbinectedin with cisplatin was not possible in meaningful therapeutic dosage due to toxicity. The addition of aprepitant in combination with cisplatin did not allow increasing the dose due to hematological toxicity, whereas omitting aprepitant increased the incidence of nausea and vomiting. Modest clinical activity was observed in general.Clinical trial registration www.ClinicalTrials.gov code: NCT01980667. Date of registration: 11 November 2013.

A phase I trial of inotuzumab ozogamicin in combination with temsirolimus in patients with relapsed or refractory CD22-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas

This phase I trial evaluated the safety, tolerability, and preliminary activity of inotuzumab ozogamicin in combination with temsirolimus in patients with relapsed/refractory CD22 positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Nineteen patients received at least one dose of both study drugs. Dose-limiting toxicities consisted of thrombocytopenia, hypertriglyceridemia, oral mucositis, clinical deterioration, and the inability to receive at least three doses of temsirolimus during cycle 1. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n = 8), neutropenia (n = 5), and two patients each hyperphosphatemia, lymphopenia, and hypertriglyceridemia. The recommended phase II dose was inotuzumab ozogamicin 0.8 mg/m² on day 1 in combination with temsirolimus 10 mg on days 8, 15, and 22 every 28 days. Among 18 patients evaluable, seven (39%) with follicular lymphoma had a partial remission. This drug combination is not possible within a therapeutically useful range of doses due to toxicities. Antitumor activity was observed in heavily pretreated patients (ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT01535989).

Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of the Dual PI3K-mTORC1/2 Inhibitor Gedatolisib in Combination with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

This phase I study evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary activity of the PI3K/mTORC1/2 dual inhibitor gedatolisib combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced solid tumors treated with ≤ 2 prior chemotherapies received intravenous gedatolisib on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (95, 110, or 130 mg according to dose level); carboplatin (AUC5) on day 8 (day 1 following protocol amendment); and paclitaxel at 80 mg/m² on days 8, 15, and 22 (1, 8, and 15 after amendment), every 28 days. Patients without progressive disease after cycle 6 received maintenance gedatolisib until progression.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were enrolled [11 ovarian (10 clear cell ovarian cancer, CCOC), 4 endometrial, 2 lung cancers]. Median number of prior chemotherapies was 1 (range, 0-2). Median number of administered cycles was 6 (range, 2-16). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 4 patients: 2 (cycle 2 delay due to G2-G3 neutropenia) at 110 mg leading to a change in the treatment schedule, 2 at 130 mg (G2 mucositis causing failure to deliver ≥ 75% of gedatolisib at cycle 1). The recommended phase II dose is gedatolisib 110 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 with carboplatin AUC5 on day 1 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15. The most frequent ≥G3 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (35%), anemia (18%), and mucositis (12%). The overall response rate was 65% (80% in CCOC). Pharmacokinetic parameters of gedatolisib were consistent with single-agent results.

CONCLUSIONS

Gedatolisib combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel is tolerable, and preliminary efficacy was observed especially in CCOC.

Radiomics in cervical and endometrial cancer

Radiomics is an emerging field of research that aims to find associations between quantitative information extracted from imaging examinations and clinical data to support the best clinical decision. In the last few years, some papers have been evaluating the role of radiomics in gynecological malignancies, mainly focusing on ovarian cancer. Nonetheless, cervical cancer is the most frequent gynecological malignancy in developing countries and endometrial cancer is the most common in western countries. The purpose of this narrative review is to give an overview of the latest published papers evaluating the role of radiomics in cervical and endometrial cancer, mostly evaluating association with tumor prognostic factors, with response to therapy and with prediction of recurrence and distant metastasis.

Abstract 1366: Integrated population modeling of loncastuximab tesirine (Lonca) exposure in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL)

Lonca is an antibody (Ab) drug conjugate comprising a humanized monoclonal Ab directed against B-cell antigen CD19, conjugated with a potent pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) dimer toxin. In a Phase 1 (NCT02669017) study in relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-NHL, a recommended Phase 2 dosing regimen for Lonca of 150 µg/kg once every 3 weeks (Q3W) for two doses, followed by 75 µg/kg Q3W was identified then evaluated in a Phase 2 (NCT03589469) study in R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model was developed to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the Lonca dosing regimen and evaluate exposure covariates.

The integrated PPK model was used to describe drug concentrations for Lonca PBD-conjugated Ab (5,301 samples), total Ab (5,241 samples), and unconjugated warhead SG3199 (239 samples) in serum from 328 patients. Samples were taken pre-dose, at end of infusion and at pre-determined timepoints post-infusion throughout the trials. Analysis was performed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM, v7.4 [ICON Solutions]). Subgroup analyses were conducted on model-predicted exposure metrics derived from simulation of Lonca PK profiles based on empirical Bayesian estimates of individual PK parameters.

Concentration-time data of Lonca PBD-conjugated Ab and total Ab were best characterized by a two-compartment model with parallel linear clearance (0.218 L/day), and a time-dependent clearance component which approached zero by ~15 weeks. The estimated volume of distribution of central compartment was 3.86 L and the estimated typical half-life at steady state of Lonca is ~3 weeks. The effect of body weight, age, sex, race, renal impairment, drug formulation, anti-drug Ab, ECOG, and concomitant P-gp inhibitors did not show clinically important influence on exposure (&lt; ±30% change relative to reference). Based on model-predicted Cycle 1 average concentration (Cavg) patients with low albumin (&lt;35 g/L, n=49) had 52% lower Cavg than patients with normal albumin levels (≥35 g/L, n=279). Patients with non-DLBCL (n=44) had 61% lower Cavg than patients with DLBCL (n=284). Trends of lower exposures with baseline mild/moderate hepatic impairment and ECOG status &gt;1 were noted but did not appear to be of clinical relevance.

In conclusion, Lonca exposure was well described by a two-compartment model with linear and time-dependent clearance; the latter is thought to reflect reduction of tumor cells. Lonca exposure was lower in non-DLBCL patients, and lower in patients with hypoalbuminemia secondary to enhanced protein clearance in patients with critical illness. Overall, modeling demonstrates rapid attainment of steady-state exposure for Lonca given 150 µg/kg Q3W for two doses, and a sustaining profile for Lonca given 75 µg/kg Q3W thereafter for patients with DLBCL.

Citation Format: Melhem Solh, Juan Pablo Alderuccio, Anastasios Stathis, David Ungar, Sam Liao, Lisa Khouri, Xiaoyan Zhang, Joseph Boni. Integrated population modeling of loncastuximab tesirine (Lonca) exposure in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1366.

New drugs and pharmacological interactions in real life

A high number of new drugs have entered clinical development and many of them have recently been approved for patients with lymphoid malignancies. The availability of new drugs offers additional treatment options, but it also requires particular attention for the emergence of adverse events. In addition, new drugs may also have interactions with other drugs, which could further increase the risk of toxicities or result in decreased efficacy. Here we review potential drug interactions for nonchemotherapy new drugs approved for patients with lymphoid malignancies.

Do oncologists prefer subspecialty radiology reports? A quality care study

Background

The main objective was to assess whether CT reports of radiologists subspecialized in oncologic imaging respond better to oncological referrals than reports from general radiologists. The secondary objective was to assess differences in ratings between a senior and junior oncologist. Two hundred radiological reports pertaining to oncological patients were retrospectively selected of which 100 each were written by subspecialized radiologists and general radiologists, respectively. The senior and junior oncologists each rated all CT reports using a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) for the following information: anatomical details; interpretation of findings; need for further explanations; appropriateness of conclusions; overall satisfaction. Comparisons between ratings assigned to reports from generalist radiologists and subspecialty radiologists were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Agreement between both oncologists was assessed through Gwet's coefficient.

Results

For all but two of the five items obtained from the senior oncologist, oncologists' ratings were significantly higher for subspecialty radiologists' reports (p < 0.01); mean values from both oncologists were generally higher for subspecialty reports (p < 0.001). Agreement between the senior and junior oncologist in the rating of reports from general and subspecialty radiologists was either moderate to substantial (0.5986–0.6788) or substantial to almost perfect (0.6958–0.8358).

Conclusions

According to a senior and junior oncologist, CT reports performed by subspecialized radiologists in oncologic imaging are clearer, more accurate, and more appropriate in the interpretation and conclusions compared to reports written by general radiologists. Likewise, the overall satisfaction of the oncologist from a subspecialized radiologist report is higher.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-021-01007-4.