Combining blinatumomab with targeted therapy for BCR-ABL mutant relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Liposomal T cell engager and re-director for tumor cell eradication in cancer immunotherapy

T cells are one of the most important effector cells in cancer immunotherapy. Various T cell-dependent bispecific antibody (TDB) drugs that engage T cells for targeted cancer cell lysis are being developed. Here, we describe supra-molecular T-cell redirecting antibody fragment-anchored liposomes (TRAFsomes) and report their immune modulation and anti-cancer effects. We found that TRAFsomes containing different copies of anti-CD3 fragments displayed different T cell modulation profiles, showing that optimization of surface density is needed to define the therapeutic window for potentiating cancer cell-specific immune reactions while minimizing nonspecific side effects. Moreover, small molecular immunomodulators may also be incorporated by liposomal encapsulation to drive CD8 + T cell biased immune responses. In vivo studies using human peripheral blood mononuclear cell reconstituted mouse models showed that TRAFsomes remained bounded to human T cells and persisted for more than 48 hours after injection. However, only TRAFsomes containing a few anti-CD3 (n = 9) demonstrated significant T cell-mediated anti-cancer activities to reverse tumor growth. Those with more anti-CD3s (n = 70) caused tumor growth and depletion of human T cells at the end of treatments. These data suggested that TRAFsomes can be as potent as traditional TDBs and the liposomal structure offers great potential for immunomodulation and improvement of the therapeutic index.

Abbreviation: Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells), Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) Cytotoxic T cell (CTL) Effector: target ratios (E:T ratios), Heavy chain (HC) Immune-related adverse events (irAE), Large unilamellar vesicle (LUV), Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs, Single-chain variable fragment (scFv), T cell-dependent bispecific antibody (TDB), T cell redirecting antibody fragment-anchored liposomes (TRAFsomes), Methoxy poly-(ethylene glycol) (mPEG)

Treatment Selection for Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the Era of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

With the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has entered a new era. The efficacy of TKIs compared with other ALL treatment options is emphasized by a rapid increase in the number of TKI clinical trials. Subsequently, the use of traditional approaches, such as combined chemotherapy and even allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), for the treatment of ALL is being challenged in the clinic. In light of the increased use of TKIs in the clinic, several questions have been raised. First, is it necessary to use intensive chemotherapy during the induction course of therapy to achieve a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status? Must a patient reach a complete molecular response/major molecular response before receiving allo-HSCT? Does MRD status affect long-term survival after allo-HSCT? Is auto-HSCT an appropriate alternative for allo-HSCT in those Ph+ ALL patients who lack suitable donors? Here, we review the recent literature in an attempt to summarize the current status of TKI usage in the clinic, including several new therapeutic approaches, provide answers for the above questions, and speculate on the future direction of TKI utilization for the treatment of Ph+ ALL patients.

Dasatinib as an investigational drug for the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults

INTRODUCTION

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with BCR-ABL1 translocation is an aggressive malignancy that is usually treated with intensive chemotherapy with the possibility of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The encoded fusion protein may be important for leukemogenesis; clinical studies show that dasatinib has an antileukemic effect in combination with steroids alone or intensive chemotherapy. Areas covered: Relevant publications were identified through literature searches (the used terms being acute lymphoblastic leukemia plus dasatinib) in the PubMed database. We searched for original articles and reviews describing the pharmacology and clinical use of dasatinib in ALL with BCR-ABL1. The mechanism of action, pharmacology and clinical study findings are examined. Expert opinion: Dasatinib is associated with a high complete remission rate in ALL when used alone and in combination with steroids or intensive chemotherapy. However, mutations at T315 and F317 are associated with dasatinib resistance. Overall toxicity has been acceptable in these studies and no unexpected toxicity was observed. It is not known whether the antileukemic effect of dasatinib differs between subsets of BCR-ABL1⁺ patients or is attributed to inhibition of the fusion protein alone, or a combined effect on several kinases, and whether dasatinib-containing combination treatment should be preferred in these patients instead of other emerging strategies, e.g. monoclonal antibodies.

Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

OPINION STATEMENT

With the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the management of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL), the prognosis of patients has improved dramatically. Currently, the standard of care in the frontline setting for fit patients is TKI in combination with chemotherapy. Age-adjusted chemotherapy or corticosteroids alone have been used with TKIs in elderly patients with comorbidities with modest long-term benefit. The primary goal of treatment is the achievement of early deep molecular remission as the achievement of complete molecular remission (CMR) at 3 months has been demonstrated to be predictive of higher long-term survival. The probability of attaining this goal by a more potent TKIs like dasatinib or ponatinib is higher, thus we recommend the use of second- or third-generation TKIs over imatinib. Clinicians should be aware of possible fatal cardiovascular events mainly related to ponatinib. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) should still be considered in first remission, especially for younger patients treated with imatinib combination therapy. A subset of patients achieving CMR at 3 months may be able to continue consolidation and maintenance with chemotherapy and TKI without the need for alloHSCT. Because of higher risk of relapses in the central nervous system, intrathecal chemoprophylaxis is mandatory for all patients. New strategies incorporating novel agents, such as antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific monoclonal antibodies, potent TKIs, and CAR T cells are under investigation.