EVI1 expression predicts outcome in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients

Low EVI1 expression at diagnosis predicted poor outcomes in pediatric Ph-negative B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients

Abnormally high ecotropic viral integration site 1 (EVI1) expression has been recognized as a poor prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukemia patients. However, its prognostic impact in B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) remains unknown. A total of 176 pediatric Ph-negative BCP-ALL patients who received at least 1 course of chemotherapy and received chemotherapy only during follow-up were retrospectively tested for EVI1 transcript levels by real-time quantitative PCR at diagnosis, and survival analysis was performed. Clinical and EVI1 expression data of 129 pediatric BCP-ALL patients were downloaded from therapeutically applicable research to generate effective treatments (TARGET) database for validation. In our cohort, the median EVI1 transcript level was 0.33% (range, 0.0068-136.2%), and 0.10% was determined to be the optimal cutoff value for patient grouping by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Low EVI1 expression (<0.10%) was significantly related to lower 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates (P = 0.017 and 0.018, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that EVI1 expression <0.10% was an independent adverse prognostic factor for RFS and OS. TARGET data showed that low EVI1 expression tended to be related to a lower 5-year OS rate (P = 0.066). In conclusion, low EVI1 expression at diagnosis could predict poor outcomes in pediatric Ph-negative BCP-ALL patients receiving chemotherapy.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/08880018.2021.1939818 .

MECOM rearrangement involving the MYC locus: Two additional patients with the rare translocation, t(3;8)(q26.2;q24), and molecular review

A relatively small subset of myeloid neoplasms involve rearrangements of cytoband 3q26.2. Such rearrangements are often in response to therapy and carry a poor prognosis. The ectopic expression of MECOM is the result of such translocations. To date, thirty-three t(3;8)(q26.2;q24) cases have been reported; we contribute two patients with confirmed MECOM and MYC rearrangements. Both patients presented with pancytopenia and were diagnosed with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative disorders. In addition to translocation t(3;8), Patient 1 possessed a derivative chromosome 5, while Patient 2 possessed monosomy 7; neither patient's clonal abnormalities resolved in follow-up studies. Of the previous 33 cases, one exhibited 5q loss, while monosomy 7 was found in fifteen. These findings contribute to the small number of reported cases with t(3;8) translocations. We also speculate about the molecular mechanisms associated with this translocation.