High WT1 expression predicted induction chemotherapy failure in acute myeloid leukemia patients with non-favorable cytogenetic risk

The prognostic significance of WT1 expression at diagnosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains obscure, and subgroup analysis is the way for clarification. We previously reported the results in t(8;21) AML. In this study, 437 consecutive adult AML patients with non-favorable cytogenetic risk were enrolled. All patients were tested WT1 transcript levels using real-time quantitative PCR at diagnosis; AML-related common fusion genes, KMT2A-PTD, FLT3-ITD, NPM1, CEBPA and TP53 mutations were simultaneously tested. 92.4% of patients overexpressed WT1 compared to normal bone marrow. The existence of FLT3-ITD, NPM1 mutation and the absence of CEBPA biallelic mutation were significantly related to higher WT1 expression. The cutoff value for WT1 was determined by performing receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in regard to complete remission (CR) achievement and was used to categorize patients into low-expression (WT1-L) and high-expression (WT1-H) groups. In the entire cohort, WT1-H was significantly associated with a lower 1-course and 2-course CR rate (P < 0.0010 and P = 0.0060) but was not related to relapse-free survival (RFS). Multivariate analysis showed that WT1-H was an independent adverse prognostic factor for both 1-course and 2-course CR achievement. Subgroup analysis was further performed. WT1-H had a significant adverse impact on CR achievement within intermediate-cytogenetic risk, high-cytogenetic risk, ELN-defined-intermediate-risk, normal karyotype, KMT2A rearrangement, FAB-M2, FAB-M5 and NPM1 mutation (+) subgroups, whereas it had no impact within ELN-defined-low-risk, ELN-defined-high-risk, FAB-M4, FLT3-ITD mutation (+) and CEBPA biallelic mutation (+) subgroups. Moreover, WT1-H patients had a significantly lower RFS rate than WT1-L patients within both FAB-M5 and KMT2A rearrangement subgroups (P = 0.010 and 0.028), whereas WT1 had no impact on RFS within other subgroups mentioned above (all P > 0.05). Therefore, high WT1 expression at diagnosis independently predicted induction chemotherapy failure in AML patients with non-favorable cytogenetic risk, and it was related to relapse just within FAB-M5 and KMT2A rearrangement subgroups.

Low EVI1 expression at diagnosis predicted poor outcomes in pediatric Ph-negative B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients

Abnormally high ecotropic viral integration site 1 (EVI1) expression has been recognized as a poor prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukemia patients. However, its prognostic impact in B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) remains unknown. A total of 176 pediatric Ph-negative BCP-ALL patients who received at least 1 course of chemotherapy and received chemotherapy only during follow-up were retrospectively tested for EVI1 transcript levels by real-time quantitative PCR at diagnosis, and survival analysis was performed. Clinical and EVI1 expression data of 129 pediatric BCP-ALL patients were downloaded from therapeutically applicable research to generate effective treatments (TARGET) database for validation. In our cohort, the median EVI1 transcript level was 0.33% (range, 0.0068-136.2%), and 0.10% was determined to be the optimal cutoff value for patient grouping by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Low EVI1 expression (<0.10%) was significantly related to lower 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates (P = 0.017 and 0.018, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that EVI1 expression <0.10% was an independent adverse prognostic factor for RFS and OS. TARGET data showed that low EVI1 expression tended to be related to a lower 5-year OS rate (P = 0.066). In conclusion, low EVI1 expression at diagnosis could predict poor outcomes in pediatric Ph-negative BCP-ALL patients receiving chemotherapy.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/08880018.2021.1939818 .

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with ulcerative colitis that shows rectal sparing at initial diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterised by mucosal inflammation from the rectum to its proximal area in a symmetric and continuous fashion. However, although uncommon, we encounter cases of UC with rectal sparing in the initial stage.

AIM

To evaluate the clinical characteristics and clinical course for rectal sparing UC compared with typical UC.

METHODS

We looked at records from 2004 to 2015, and selected patients who were newly diagnosed with UC, and who could be followed up for at least 5 years in our hospital. We then retrospectively analysed the medical records and endoscopic findings of those patients. To compare the clinical course and prognosis, we matched each patient with rectal sparing UC 1:3 with controls by age, sex, and disease extent.

RESULTS

Of 619 UC patients, 24 (3.9%) showed rectal sparing at diagnosis. During the follow-up period (median 8 years), in two (8.3%) of the 24 patients, rectal sparing remained through follow-up inspections; but for the other 22 (91.7%) patients, obvious rectal inflammation was found at follow-up endoscopy. Of the 24 patients, 8 (33.3%) were initially misdiagnosed with infectious colitis. No diagnosis was changed to Crohn’s disease. The uses of corticosteroid or biologic agents, hospitalisation rate, and colectomy rates were not different between the rectal sparing UC group and typical UC group.

CONCLUSION

Some patients with UC can reveal atypical patterns of disease distribution, such as rectal sparing in its initial stage; but despite this, the clinical course and prognosis may not differ from those of typical UC patients.