The challenge of myeloma-related thromboembolic disease: can thrombin generation assay help physicians to better predict the thromboembolic risk and personalize anti-thrombotic prophylaxis?

Enhanced thrombin generation detected with ST-Genesia analyzer in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

The issue of how to identify newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients requiring thromboprophylaxis remains unsolved. Several changes in thrombin generation (TG)-derived parameters have been described in multiple myeloma (MM) patients recently. Assessment of prothrombotic risk with a fully automated TG analyzer could reduce interlaboratory variability. Our objective was to determine whether ST-Genesia^® could reveal a hypercoagulable state in NDMM compared to healthy controls. We conducted a multicenter observational study of NDMM requiring initial treatment to compare TG parameters obtained with ST-Genesia^® analyzer and ST-ThromboScreen^® reagent with a control group. Clinical data were obtained from medical records and blood samples were collected before initial anti-myeloma therapy. A thrombophilia panel was performed in all patients. Compared to age- and sex-matched controls (n = 83), NDMM patients (n = 83) had significantly higher peak height, higher velocity index, shorter time-to-peak and lower percentage of endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) inhibition after adding thrombomodulin (TM) (ETP%inh). NDMM on prophylactic low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) showed reduced both peak height and velocity index compared to NDMM who had not yet started VTE prophylaxis, similar to that of controls. Moreover, partial correction of ETP%inh was observed in MM patients on LMWH. The presence of a thrombophilia did not modify the TG phenotype. Untreated NDMM patients showed an enhanced TG, regardless of their thrombophilia status. They generate a higher peak of thrombin, take less time to produce it, and exhibit resistance to TM inhibition. Our findings suggest that standard prophylactic dose of LMWH may reduce TG at levels of healthy controls.

Thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in multiple myeloma (MM) can be secondary to patient-, disease-, and/or treatment-related factors. The development of VTE may result in significant morbidity with the highest risk during the first year after diagnosis. This clinical review provides an evidence-based summary to guide practicing oncologists in the use of anticoagulation to prevent VTE in multiple myeloma and includes anticoagulation efficacy and adverse effect profile. We highlight the pathophysiology of VTE in MM, the use of various risk prediction tools, and the current recommendations for the use of different anticoagulants in prophylaxis of VTE.

Patients With Multiple Myeloma Have a Disbalanced Whole Blood Thrombin Generation Profile

Background

Multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with a high prevalence of bleeding and an increased risk of thrombo-embolism. MM patients have reduced platelet- and red blood cell (RBC) numbers in blood, which may indicate that the paradoxical hemostasis profile is a consequence of a disturbed platelet and RBC homeostasis.

Objectives

To get better insight in the disbalanced hemostasis of MM patients.

Methods

We conducted a case-control study on the whole blood (WB) coagulation profiles of 21 MM patients and 21 controls. We measured thrombin generation (TG) in WB and platelet poor plasma (PPP) of MM patients and controls.

Results

In WB-TG, we observed that the median time to the thrombin Peak was 52% longer in MM patients than in controls, while the median endogenous thrombin potential until the Peak (ETPp) was 39% higher in MM-patients than in controls. In line with these findings, the levels of platelets, RBCs, white blood cells and agonist induced platelet activation were decreased in MM patients compared to controls. The plasma TG experiments showed no differences between MM-patients and controls.

Conclusion

Patients with MM have a disturbed blood cell metabolism and a disbalanced WB-TG profile. This disbalance may explain the paradoxically high prevalence of bleeding symptoms in MM patients vs. an increased thrombosis risk. There was no disturbance observed in plasma TG, indicating that blood cells are the major determinants for the disbalanced hemostasis in MM patients.

Multiple Myeloma and Thrombosis: Prophylaxis and Risk Prediction Tools

Thromboembolism in multiple myeloma (MM) patients remains a common complication that renders the optimization of our thromboprophylaxis practice necessary. This review aims to make clear the need for the development of more accurate risk assessment tools and means of thrombosis prevention. Current clinical practice is guided by available guidelines published by the IMWG in 2014, but the extent to which these are implemented is unclear. Recently, several groups developed clinical scores for thrombosis risk in MM in an attempt to improve risk stratification, but these have not been validated or used in clinical practice so far. Research in this field is increasingly focusing on understanding the unique coagulation profile of the MM patient, and data on potential biomarkers that accurately reflect hypercoagulability is emerging. Finally, promising evidence on the effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the context of thrombosis prevention in MM patients is increasingly becoming available. The critical appraisal of the above research areas will establish the necessity of combining disease-specific clinical risk factors with coagulation biomarkers to allow more effective risk stratification that will eventually lead to the reduction of this significant complication. Results from ongoing clinical trials on the role of DOACs are much anticipated.