Mutational landscape of chronic myeloid leukemia: more than a single oncogene leukemia

Frequency and prognostic influence of ASXL1 mutations and its potential association with BCR-ABL1 transcript type and smoke in chronic myeloid leukemia patients

BACKGROUND

Heterogeneous response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and progress to advance phases, still is a significant clinical problem. These are attributed to additional mutations in mutated non-ABL1 genes. we aimed to determine prognostic effects of ASXL1 mutations as a biomarker for diverse treatment response and disease progression to aid clinical management.

METHODS

We performed ASXL1 gene mutational screening in 80 Ph+CML patients at different phases and 10 healthy control by direct sequencing method. Multiplex and qRT-PCR, standard chromosome banding analysis were used to determine BCR-ABL1 transcript type, molecular and cytogenetic responses respectively.

RESULTS

overall, four type mutations were identified in 11.25% of the patients. There was significant difference regarding mutation frequency between chronic and advance phases (P = 0.0002), sokal risk score (P = 0.0001), smoking (P = 0.02) and mean of during time of imatinib treatment (P = 0.009) between patients with and without ASXL1 mutations. ASXL1 mutations frequency had a bias toward younger than older and women than men, but no significant (P > 0.05). ASXL1 mutations were found more recurrently in patients carrying ABL1 KD mutations (P = 0.003). The risk of increasing resistance and disease progression in patients with ASXL1 mutations was 32 and 63 fold higher than those without mutations respectively (P = 0.01; P = 0.0002). The risk of ASXL1 mutations presence in patients with b2a2 transcript type was much higher than b3a2 type (P = 0.02, OR = 10).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that ASXL1 mutations may be favorable predictive biomarkers to determine the best TKI for each patient, and to prevent CML progression.

European LeukemiaNet laboratory recommendations for the diagnosis and management of chronic myeloid leukemia

From the laboratory perspective, effective management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) requires accurate diagnosis, assessment of prognostic markers, sequential assessment of levels of residual disease and investigation of possible reasons for resistance, relapse or progression. Our scientific and clinical knowledge underpinning these requirements continues to evolve, as do laboratory methods and technologies. The European LeukemiaNet convened an expert panel to critically consider the current status of genetic laboratory approaches to help diagnose and manage CML patients. Our recommendations focus on current best practice and highlight the strengths and pitfalls of commonly used laboratory tests.

Deciphering Potential Molecular Signatures to Differentiate Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with BCR::ABL1 from Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in Blast Crisis

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with BCR::ABL1 has recently been recognized as a distinct subtype in international classifications. Distinguishing it from myeloid blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia (BC-CML) without evidence of a chronic phase (CP), remains challenging. We aimed to better characterize this entity by integrating clonal architecture analysis, mutational landscape assessment, and gene expression profiling. We analyzed a large retrospective cohort study including CML and AML patients. Two AML patients harboring a BCR::ABL1 fusion were included in the study. We identified BCR::ABL1 fusion as a primary event in one patient and a secondary one in the other. AML-specific variants were identified in both. Real-time RT-PCR experiments demonstrated that CD25 mRNA is overexpressed in advanced-phase CML compared to AML. Unsupervised principal component analysis showed that AML harboring a BCR::ABL1 fusion was clustered within AML. An AML vs. myeloid BC-CML differential expression signature was highlighted, and while ID4 (inhibitor of DNA binding 4) mRNA appears undetectable in most myeloid BC-CML samples, low levels are detected in AML samples. Therefore, CD25 and ID4 mRNA expression might differentiate AML with BCR::ABL1 from BC-CML and assign it to the AML group. A method for identifying this new WHO entity is then proposed. Finally, the hypothesis of AML with BCR::ABL1 arising from driver mutations on a BCR::ABL1 background behaving as a clonal hematopoiesis mutation is discussed. Validation of our data in larger cohorts and basic research are needed to better understand the molecular and cellular aspects of AML with a BCR::ABL1 entity.

Prognosis in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Baseline Factors, Dynamic Risk Assessment and Novel Insights

The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has changed the treatment paradigm of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), leading to a dramatic improvement of the outcome of CML patients, who now have a nearly normal life expectancy and, in some selected cases, the possibility of aiming for the more ambitious goal of treatment-free remission (TFR). However, the minority of patients who fail treatment and progress from chronic phase (CP) to accelerated phase (AP) and blast phase (BP) still have a relatively poor prognosis. The identification of predictive elements enabling a prompt recognition of patients at higher risk of progression still remains among the priorities in the field of CML management. Currently, the baseline risk is assessed using simple clinical and hematologic parameters, other than evaluating the presence of additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs), especially those at "high-risk". Beyond the onset, a re-evaluation of the risk status is mandatory, monitoring the response to TKI treatment. Moreover, novel critical insights are emerging into the role of genomic factors, present at diagnosis or evolving on therapy. This review presents the current knowledge regarding prognostic factors in CML and their potential role for an improved risk classification and a subsequent enhancement of therapeutic decisions and disease management.

Clonal evolution in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistance: lessons from in vitro-models

Introduction

Resistance in anti-cancer treatment is a result of clonal evolution and clonal selection. In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the hematopoietic neoplasm is predominantly caused by the formation of the BCR::ABL1 kinase. Evidently, treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is tremendously successful. It has become the role model of targeted therapy. However, therapy resistance to TKIs leads to loss of molecular remission in about 25% of CML patients being partially due to BCR::ABL1 kinase mutations, while for the remaining cases, various other mechanisms are discussed.

Methods

Here, we established an in vitro-TKI resistance model against the TKIs imatinib and nilotinib and performed exome sequencing.

Results

In this model, acquired sequence variants in NRAS, KRAS, PTPN11, and PDGFRB were identified in TKI resistance. The well-known pathogenic NRAS p.(Gln61Lys) variant provided a strong benefit for CML cells under TKI exposure visible by increased cell number (6.2-fold, p < 0.001) and decreased apoptosis (-25%, p < 0.001), proving the functionality of our approach. The transfection of PTPN11 p.(Tyr279Cys) led to increased cell number (1.7-fold, p = 0.03) and proliferation (2.0-fold, p < 0.001) under imatinib treatment.

Discussion

Our data demonstrate that our in vitro-model can be used to study the effect of specific variants on TKI resistance and to identify new driver mutations and genes playing a role in TKI resistance. The established pipeline can be used to study candidates acquired in TKI-resistant patients, thereby providing new options for the development of new therapy strategies to overcome resistance.

Transplantation in CML in the TKI era: who, when, and how?

Molecular therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has significantly reduced the indication for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Treatment-free remission can be obtained in about 50% of patients with an optimal response. However, cure rates up to 90% are restricted to patients receiving HSCT. Timing is essential since HSCT in the early stages of the disease has the best outcome. Patients in a more advanced phase (AdP) than chronic-phase (chP) CML undergo HSCT with suboptimal outcomes, and the gap between chP and AdP disease is widening. First-line therapy should start with first- or second-generation (G) TKIs. Patients failing treatment (BCR-ABL1 transcripts of greater than 10% at 3 and 6 months and greater than 1% at 12 months) should be switched to second-line TKIs, and HSCT should be considered. Patients not responding to 2G-TKI therapy as well as patients in an accelerated phase (AP) or blast crisis (BC) are candidates for HSCT. Therapy resistant BCR-ABL1 mutations, high-risk additional cytogenetic abnormalities, and molecular signs of leukemia progression should trigger the indication for HSCT. Patients who, despite dose adjustments, do not tolerate or develop severe adverse events, including vascular events, to multiple TKIs are also candidates for HSCT. In AdP CML, TKIs do not show long-lasting results, and the outcome of HSCT is less optimal without pretransplant therapy. In these patients the induction of chP2 with TKIs, either alone (AP) or in combination with intensive chemotherapy (BC), followed by HSCT should be pursued.

Therapy Resistance and Disease Progression in CML: Mechanistic Links and Therapeutic Strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the adoption of tyrosine kinases inhibitors (TKIs) as molecular targeted therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia, some patients do not respond to treatment and even experience disease progression. This review aims to give a broad summary of advances in understanding of the mechanisms of therapy resistance, as well as management strategies that may overcome or prevent the emergence of drug resistance. Ultimately, the goal of therapy is the cure of CML, which will also require an increased understanding of the leukemia stem cell (LSC).

RECENT FINDINGS

Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors stems from a range of possible causes. Mutations of the BCR-ABL1 fusion oncoprotein have been well-studied. Other causes range from cell-intrinsic factors, such as the inherent resistance of primitive stem cells to drug treatment, to mechanisms extrinsic to the leukemic compartment that help CML cells evade apoptosis. There exists heterogeneity in TKI response among different hematopoietic populations in CML. The abundances of these TKI-sensitive and TKI-insensitive populations differ from patient to patient and contribute to response heterogeneity. It is becoming clear that targeting the BCR-ABL1 kinase through TKIs is only one part of the equation, and TKI usage alone may not cure the majority of patients with CML. Considerable effort should be devoted to targeting the BCR-ABL1-independent mechanisms of resistance and persistence of CML LSCs.

Prognostic impact of ASXL1 mutations in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia

While the clinical impact of mutations in the ABL1 gene on response to therapy in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) is well established, less is known about how other mutations affect prognosis. In a retrospective analysis, we identified 115 patients with CML (71 chronic, 15 accelerated and 29 blast phase) where targeted next-generation sequencing of genes recurrently mutated in myeloid leukemias was performed. ASXL1 was the most frequently mutated gene in the chronic (14%) and accelerated phase (40%) CML patients, whereas RUNX1 (20%) was the most common mutation in blast phase. Compared with wild-type ASXL1, CP-CML with mutant ASXL1 was associated with worse event-free survival (EFS) (median of 32.8 vs 88.3 months; P = 0.002) and failure-free survival (median of 13.8 vs 57.8 months; P = 0.04). In a multivariate analysis, ASXL1 mutation was the only independent risk factor associated with worse EFS in chronic phase CML with a hazard ratio of 4.25 (95% CI 1.59–11.35, P = 0.004). In conclusion, mutations in ASXL1 are associated with worse outcomes when detected in chronic phase CML.

Atypical presentation of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase—Case report

The presence of the translocation t(9;22)(q34;q11), leading to the BCR::ABL1 fusion transcript, is the hallmark of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Nevertheless, atypical presentation at diagnosis can be challenging. However, although most patients with CML are diagnosed with the e13a2 or e14a2 BCR::ABL1 fusion transcripts, about 5% of them carry rare BCR::ABL1 fusion transcripts, such as e19a2, e8a2, e13a3, e14a3, e1a3, and e6a2. In particular, the e6a2 fusion transcript has been associated with clinically aggressive disease frequently presenting in accelerated or blast crisis phases. To date, there is limited evidence on the efficacy of front-line second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors for this genotype. Here, we report two patients, in whom the diagnosis of CML was challenging. The use of primers recognizing more distant exons from the common BCR::ABL1 breakpoint region correctly identified the atypical BCR::ABL1 e6a2 fusion transcript. Treatment with the second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib was effective in our patient expressing the atypical e6a2 BCR::ABL1 fusion transcript.

Integrated genomic sequencing in myeloid blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia (MBC-CML), identified potentially important findings in the context of leukemogenesis model

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a model of leukemogenesis in which the exact molecular mechanisms underlying blast crisis still remained unexplored. The current study identified multiple common and rare important findings in myeloid blast crisis CML (MBC-CML) using integrated genomic sequencing, covering all classes of genes implicated in the leukemogenesis model. Integrated genomic sequencing via Whole Exome Sequencing (WES), Chromosome-seq and RNA-sequencing were conducted on the peripheral blood samples of three CML patients in the myeloid blast crisis. An in-house filtering pipeline was applied to assess important variants in cancer-related genes. Standard variant interpretation guidelines were used for the interpretation of potentially important findings (PIFs) and potentially actionable findings (PAFs). Single nucleotide variation (SNV) and small InDel analysis by WES detected sixteen PIFs affecting all five known classes of leukemogenic genes in myeloid malignancies including signaling pathway components (ABL1, PIK3CB, PTPN11), transcription factors (GATA2, PHF6, IKZF1, WT1), epigenetic regulators (ASXL1), tumor suppressor and DNA repair genes (BRCA2, ATM, CHEK2) and components of spliceosome (PRPF8). These variants affect genes involved in leukemia stem cell proliferation, self-renewal, and differentiation. Both patients No.1 and No.2 had actionable known missense variants on ABL1 (p.Y272H, p.F359V) and frameshift variants on ASXL1 (p.A627Gfs*8, p.G646Wfs*12). The GATA2-L359S in patient No.1, PTPN11-G503V and IKZF1-R208Q variants in the patient No.3 were also PAFs. RNA-sequencing was used to confirm all of the identified variants. In the patient No. 3, chromosome sequencing revealed multiple pathogenic deletions in the short and long arms of chromosome 7, affecting at least three critical leukemogenic genes (IKZF1, EZH2, and CUX1). The large deletion discovered on the short arm of chromosome 17 in patient No. 2 resulted in the deletion of TP53 gene as well. Integrated genomic sequencing combined with RNA-sequencing can successfully discover and confirm a wide range of variants, from SNVs to CNVs. This strategy may be an effective method for identifying actionable findings and understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying MBC-CML, as well as providing further insights into the genetic basis of MBC-CML and its management in the future.

TKTL1 Knockdown Impairs Hypoxia-Induced Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase and Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate Dehydrogenase Overexpression

Increased expression of transketolase (TKT) and its isoform transketolase-like-1 (TKTL1) has been related to the malignant leukemia phenotype through promoting an increase in the non-oxidative branch of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). Recently, it has also been described that TKTL1 can have a role in survival under hypoxic conditions and in the acquisition of radio resistance. However, TKTL1’s role in triggering metabolic reprogramming under hypoxia in leukemia cells has never been characterized. Using THP-1 AML cells, and by combining metabolomics and transcriptomics techniques, we characterized the impact of TKTL1 knockdown on the metabolic reprogramming triggered by hypoxia. Results demonstrated that TKTL1 knockdown results in a decrease in TKT, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) activities and impairs the hypoxia-induced overexpression of G6PD and GAPDH, all having significant impacts on the redox capacity of NADPH- and NADH-related cells. Moreover, TKTL1 knockdown impedes hypoxia-induced transcription of genes encoding key enzymes and transporters involved in glucose, PPP and amino acid metabolism, rendering cells unable to switch to enhanced glycolysis under hypoxia. Altogether, our results show that TKTL1 plays a key role in the metabolic adaptation to hypoxia in THP-1 AML cells through modulation of G6PD and GAPDH activities, both regulating glucose/glutamine consumption and the transcriptomic overexpression of key players of PPP, glucose and amino acids metabolism.

Genomic Mechanisms Influencing Outcome in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) represents the disease prototype of genetically based diagnosis and management. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), that target the causal BCR::ABL1 fusion protein, exemplify the success of molecularly based therapy. Most patients now have long-term survival; however, TKI resistance is a persistent clinical problem. TKIs are effective in the BCR::ABL1-driven chronic phase of CML but are relatively ineffective for clinically defined advanced phases. Genomic investigation of drug resistance using next-generation sequencing for CML has lagged behind other hematological malignancies. However, emerging data show that genomic abnormalities are likely associated with suboptimal response and drug resistance. This has already been supported by the presence of BCR::ABL1 kinase domain mutations in drug resistance, which led to the development of more potent TKIs. Next-generation sequencing studies are revealing additional mutations associated with resistance. In this review, we discuss the initiating chromosomal translocation that may not always be a straightforward reciprocal event between chromosomes 9 and 22 but can sometimes be accompanied by sequence deletion, inversion, and rearrangement. These events may biologically reflect a more genomically unstable disease prone to acquire mutations. We also discuss the future role of cancer-related gene mutation analysis for risk stratification in CML.

Novel Treatment Strategies Utilizing Immune Reactions against Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Stem Cells

Simple Summary

Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are highly effective in the treatment of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), leukemic stem cells (LSCs) are known to be resistant to TKIs. As a result, the application of immunotherapies against LSCs may cure CML.

Abstract

Introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has improved the prognosis of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), and treatment-free remission (TFR) is now a treatment goal. However, about half of the patients experience molecular relapse after cessation of TKIs, suggesting that leukemic stem cells (LSCs) are resistant to TKIs. Eradication of the remaining LSCs using immunotherapies including interferon-alpha, vaccinations, CAR-T cells, and other drugs would be a key strategy to achieve TFR.