Racial disparities in the use of palliative radiotherapy for black patients with multiple myeloma in the United States

Disparities in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: recommendations from an interprofessional consensus panel

Many studies have documented racial, socioeconomic, geographic, and other disparities for United States (US) patients with multiple myeloma pertaining to diagnosis and frontline management. In contrast, very little is known about disparities in the management of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) despite a plethora of novel treatment options. In this review, we discuss the manifestations of disparities in RRMM and strategies to mitigate their impact. Immunomodulatory drugs can create disparities on many axes, for example inappropriately low dosing due to Duffy-null status as well as time toxicity and financial toxicity from logistical hurdles for socioeconomically vulnerable patients. Access to myeloma expertise at high-volume centers is a critical consideration given the disconnect between how drugs like carfilzomib and dexamethasone are prescribed in trials versus optimized in real-world practice to lower toxicities. Disparities in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibody therapy span across racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic lines in large part due to their limited availability outside of high-volume centers. Another insidious source of disparities is supportive care in RRMM, ranging from inadequate pain control in Black patients to limited primary care provider access in rural settings. We discuss the rationales and evidence base for several solutions aimed at mitigating these disparities: for example, (1) bidirectional co-management with community-based oncologists, (2) screening for risk factors based on social determinants of health, (3) strategies to build patient trust with regard to clinical trials, and (4) longitudinal access to a primary care provider. As the treatment landscape for RRMM continues to expand, these types of efforts by the field will help ensure that this landscape is equally accessible and traversable for all US patients.

Investigating potential disparities by exploring time to surgical thyroid cancer treatment

(1) Delays in initial treatment have been a frequently used metric for assessing disparities in medicine; however, there has been sparse literature on treatment delays in thyroid cancer. We therefore aimed to assess disparities by investigating the association between race/ethnicity, insurance type, and socioeconomic status and time to surgical treatment of thyroid cancer. (2) A retrospective chart review was conducted to collect demographic and clinical data from 443 surgical thyroid cancer patients at Mount Sinai Hospital in 2018-2019. We investigated the time between thyroid cancer diagnosis and surgery by race/ethnicity, insurance, and income groups. (3) Univariate analysis showed that race/ethnicity, insurance type, and SES alone were not statistically significant predictors of earlier time to treatment (p = 0.766, 0.339, 0.435, respectively). On multivariable linear regression, time between diagnosis and surgical treatment was not significantly different for racial minorities compared to non-Hispanic White patients, patients with Medicare/Medicaid compared to private insurance, and patients with lowest income quartile (<$54,585) compared to those with the highest (≥$116,560). (4) Present study showed no significant delays in treatment for different racial/ethnic, insurance, and income groups.

Real-World Utilization of Radiation Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: An Analysis of the Connect MM Registry

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy (RT) is an important treatment modality for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Although patients are living longer with MM, they are more likely to have comorbidities related to treatment, such as bone pain; however, RT can provide symptom relief. To date, the characterization of patients who have received RT in the real-world setting has been limited.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The Connect® MM Registry is a large, US multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of adult patients with newly diagnosed MM from mostly community sites. RT utilization and outcomes were analyzed quarterly throughout treatment. Factors associated with RT use were identified via multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 3011 patients were enrolled in the Connect MM Registry with 903 patients (30%) having received RT at any time. There was a significant difference (P < .05) in overall RT use among patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1 versus ≥2, International Staging System disease stage I/II versus III, a history of plasmacytoma or a novel agent in their first regimen, and any number of bone lesions or severe osteoporosis/fracture. RT use was associated with having bone lesions or severe osteoporosis (vs not having bone lesions). Additionally, RT use was associated with ethnicity (Hispanic vs not) and Connect MM Registry cohort (cohort 1 [enrolled 2009-2011] vs 2 [enrolled 2012-2016]). In the 6 months before death, increased RT use was associated with increasing number of treatment lines (P < .0001) and high- versus standard-risk disease (per International Myeloma Working Group criteria; P = .0028).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world results from the Connect MM Registry show RT is frequently used and is associated with clinical factors, including performance status and disease stage. Earlier in MM diagnosis, RT may be used as an adjunct to palliate symptoms or delay systemic therapy. Toward the end of life, RT is more frequently used for palliation when treatment options are often limited.

A Narrative Review of the Current Research in Cancer-Related Pain Inequities: The Necessity of Applying Intersectionality to Advance Cancer Pain Research

Cancer-related pain has a significant impact on quality of life for patients with cancer. In populations without cancer, there are documented pain inequities associated with minoritized racial and/or ethnic groups, women, and low socioeconomic status. However, our understanding of pain inequities specifically among patients with cancer remains incomplete. We narratively synthesized published quantitative research on cancer-related pain inequities in the US in the past decade. A search identified 17 English-language articles examining pain for patients with various cancer types at different treatment stages. Our review revealed mixed findings comparing cancer-related pain by racial group (e.g., Black vs White) and sex (male vs female), but consistent findings indicating that people with lower (vs higher) socioeconomic status and younger (vs older) patients report more cancer-related pain. Research on cancer pain among sexual and gender minorities remains scant. Key research gaps include a need for more research that incorporates an intersectional perspective by exploring intersecting subgroups and measuring social and structural processes that drive pain inequities. These findings underscore an important need for researchers to use an intersectional approach to cancer pain to help elucidate key populations at-risk for exacerbated cancer-related pain and identify ways to mitigate social and structural processes that drive these inequities.

Disparities in Multiple Myeloma Treatment Patterns in the United States: A Systematic Review

We performed a systematic review of the literature investigating the demographic and insurance-related factors linked to disparities in multiple myeloma (MM) care patterns in the United States from 2003 to 2021. Forty-six observational studies were included. Disparities in MM care patterns were reported based on patient race in 76% of studies (34 out of 45 that captured race as a study variable), ethnicity in 60% (12 out of 20), insurance in 77% (17 out of 22), and distance from treating facility, urbanicity, or geographic region in 62% (13 out of 21). A smaller proportion of studies identified disparities in MM care patterns based on other socioeconomic characteristics, with 36% (9 out of 25) identifying disparities based on income estimate or employment status and 43% (6 out of 14) based on language barrier or education-related factors. Sociodemographic characteristics are frequently associated with disparities in care for individuals diagnosed with MM. There is a need for further research regarding modifiable determinants to accessing care such as insurance plan design, patient out-of-pocket costs, preauthorization criteria, as well as social determinants of health. This information can be used to develop actionable strategies for reducing MM health disparities and enhancing timely and high-quality MM care.

Pilot Study Evaluating Cross-Disciplinary Educational Material to Improve Patients' Knowledge of Palliative Radiation Therapy

Palliative radiation therapy (PRT) is underutilized, partially due to misconceptions about its risks, benefits, and indications. The objective of this pilot study was to determine if patients with metastatic cancer would gain knowledge from educational material describing PRT and perceive it as useful in their care. A one-page handout conveying information about the purpose, logistics, benefits, risks, and common indications for PRT was offered to patients undergoing treatment for incurable, metastatic solid tumors in one palliative care clinic and four medical oncology clinics. Participants read the handout, then completed a questionnaire assessing its perceived value. Seventy patients participated between June and December 2021. Sixty-five patients (93%) felt they learned from the handout (40% learned "lots"), and 69 (99%) felt the information was useful (53% "very useful"). Twenty-one patients (30%) were previously unaware that PRT can relieve symptoms, 55 (79%) were unaware that PRT can be delivered in five treatments or less, and 43 (61%) were unaware that PRT usually has few side effects. Sixteen patients (23%) felt they currently had symptoms not being treated well enough, and 34 (49%) felt they had symptoms that radiation might help with. Afterwards, most patients felt more comfortable bringing symptoms to a medical oncologist's (n = 57, 78%) or radiation oncologist's (n = 51, 70%) attention. Patient-directed educational material about PRT, provided outside of a radiation oncology department, was perceived by patients as improving their knowledge and adding value in their care, independent of prior exposure to a radiation oncologist.