Quantile regression estimation of partially linear additive models

Non-parametric quantile regression-based modelling of additive effects to solar irradiation in Southern Africa

Modelling of solar irradiation is paramount to renewable energy management. This warrants the inclusion of additive effects to predict solar irradiation. Modelling of additive effects to solar irradiation can improve the forecasting accuracy of prediction frameworks. To help develop the frameworks, this current study modelled the additive effects using non-parametric quantile regression (QR). The approach applies quantile splines to approximate non-parametric components when finding the best relationships between covariates and the response variable. However, some additive effects are perceived as linear. Thus, the study included the partial linearly additive quantile regression model (PLAQR) in the quest to find how best the additive effects can be modelled. As a result, a comparative investigation on the forecasting performances of the PLAQR, an additive quantile regression (AQR) model and the new quantile generalised additive model (QGAM) using out-of-sample and probabilistic forecasting metric evaluations was done. Forecasted density plots, Murphy diagrams and results from the Diebold-Mariano (DM) hypothesis test were also analysed. The density plot, the curves on the Murphy diagram and most metric scores computed for the QGAM were slightly better than for the PLAQR and AQR models. That is, even though the DM test indicates that the PLAQR and AQR models are less accurate than the QGAM, we could not conclude an outright greater forecasting performance of the QGAM than the PLAQR or AQR models. However, in situations of probabilistic forecasting metric preferences, each model can be prioritised to be applied to the metric where it performed slightly the best. The three models performed differently in different locations, but the location was not a significant factor in their performances. In contrast, forecasting horizon and sample size influenced model performance differently in the three additive models. The performance variations also depended on the metric being evaluated. Therefore, the study has established the best forecasting horizons and sample sizes for the different metrics. It was finally concluded that a 20% forecasting horizon and a minimum sample size of 10000 data points are ideal when modelling additive effects of solar irradiation using non-parametric QR.

GMM Estimation of a Partially Linear Additive Spatial Error Model

This article presents a partially linear additive spatial error model (PLASEM) specification and its corresponding generalized method of moments (GMM). It also derives consistency and asymptotic normality of estimators for the case with a single nonparametric term and an arbitrary number of nonparametric additive terms under some regular conditions. In addition, the finite sample performance for our estimates is assessed by Monte Carlo simulations. Lastly, the proposed method is illustrated by analyzing Boston housing data.

Day Ahead Hourly Global Horizontal Irradiance Forecasting—Application to South African Data

Due to its variability, solar power generation poses challenges to grid energy management. In order to ensure an economic operation of a national grid, including its stability, it is important to have accurate forecasts of solar power. The current paper discusses probabilistic forecasting of twenty-four hours ahead of global horizontal irradiance (GHI) using data from the Tellerie radiometric station in South Africa for the period August 2009 to April 2010. Variables are selected using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) via hierarchical interactions and the parameters of the developed models are estimated using the Barrodale and Roberts’s algorithm. Two forecast combination methods are used in this study. The first is a convex forecast combination algorithm where the average loss suffered by the models is based on the pinball loss function. A second forecast combination method, which is quantile regression averaging (QRA), is also used. The best set of forecasts is selected based on the prediction interval coverage probability (PICP), prediction interval normalised average width (PINAW) and prediction interval normalised average deviation (PINAD). The results demonstrate that QRA gives more robust prediction intervals than the other models. A comparative analysis is done with two machine learning methods—stochastic gradient boosting and support vector regression—which are used as benchmark models. Empirical results show that the QRA model yields the most accurate forecasts compared to the machine learning methods based on the probabilistic error measures. Results on combining prediction interval limits show that the PMis the best prediction limits combination method as it gives a hit rate of 0.955 which is very close to the target of 0.95. This modelling approach is expected to help in optimising the integration of solar power in the national grid.