Characterization of PvuII polymorphisms between the ovine growth hormoneGH2‐NandGH2‐Zgene copies

Sequence polymorphisms at the growth hormone GH1/GH2-N and GH2-Z gene copies and their relationship with dairy traits in domestic sheep (Ovis aries)

The purpose was to analyze the growth hormone GH1/GH2-N and GH2-Z gene copies and to assess their possible association with milk traits in Sarda sheep. Two hundred multiparous lactating ewes were monitored. The two gene copies were amplified separately and each was used as template for a nested PCR, to investigate single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) of the 5'UTR, exon-1, exon-5 and 3'UTR DNA regions. SSCP analysis revealed marked differences in the number of polymorphic patterns between the two genes. Sequencing revealed five nucleotide changes at the GH1/GH2-N gene. Five nucleotide changes occurred at the GH2-Z gene: one was located in exon-5 (c.556G > A) and resulted in a putative amino acid substitution G186S. All the nucleotide changes were copy-specific, except c.*30delT, which was common to both GH1/GH2-N and GH2-Z. Variability in the promoter regions of each gene might have consequences on the expression level, due to the involvement in potential transcription factor binding sites. Both gene copies influenced milk yield. A correlation with milk protein and casein content was also evidenced. These results may have implications that make them useful for future breeding strategies in dairy sheep breeding.

Placental hormones and fetal–placental development

Production of growth promoting substances by the placenta is regulated differently from the way production of similar compounds is regulated by maternal organs in various cases. Gene duplication is one of the mechanisms that facilitated the evolution of placental specific endocrine activity. Cattle, sheep and goats, although evolutionarily related, differ significantly from each other in the way their placental growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL)-like hormones have evolved. Cattle carry one copy of the GH gene and there is no evidence yet for expression of that single GH gene copy in the placenta. On the other hand, the ovine GH gene has been duplicated and both oGH copies are expressed in the placenta during early stages of gestation. Prolactin gene duplication in ruminants resulted in the formation of specific placental-expressed prolactin-related genes including the placental lactogen (PL) gene. In homologous state, ovine PL manifests PRL activity, but antagonizes GH activity. Ovine PL activity which can be mediated by PRL receptors or by hetero-dimerization of GH and PRL receptors, provide a novel regulatory mechanism for somatogenic activity dependent on the coexistence of both GH and PRL receptors in the same cells. Another mechanism for specific placental endocrine activity is silencing of the alleles through genetic imprinting. Disruption of genetic imprinting of placental genes has been proposed as one of the explanations for the loss of cloned fetuses generated by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

The physiological effects of natural variation in growth hormone gene copy number in ram lambs

The effects of natural variation in the number of copies of the growth hormone (GH) gene on growth parameters, plasma GH profiles, and the response to GHRH challenge were compared in Coopworth ram lambs from selection lines differing in body composition and GH levels. Different genotypes at the GH locus carried two, three, or four copies of the GH gene and GH secretion was studied under ad libitum feeding conditions and in the fasted state. There were no significant effects of GH genotype on any parameters of growth or body composition. Basal serum GH concentration, GH pulse frequency, and GH pulse amplitude differed significantly with selection line and fasting, but did not differ significantly between the GH genotypes. Significant differences of subtle nature were found between the GH genotypes in their responsiveness to GHRH. For the ad libitum-fed Lean selection line animals, the first GHRH challenge resulted in a higher mean maximum response for GH1/GH1 than GH2/GH2 (P < 0.05). Between the first and the second challenges there was a decrease in maximum response for the GH1/GH1 genotype and an increase for the GH2/GH2 genotype (P < 0.05 for GH genotype main effect). The differences between GH genotypes in response to GHRH challenge suggest that polymorphism in the number of GH gene copies in sheep may have physiological implications for the function of the GH axis, which may be manifested in growing lambs only under specific genotype-environment combinations.

The effects of a duplication in the ovine growth hormone (GH) gene on GH expression in the pituitaries of ram lambs from lean and fat-selected sheep lines

Growth hormone (GH) gene expression was investigated in pituitaries of 14- to 15-month-old ram lambs from flocks selected for high (fat) or low (lean) back fat depth, which were also homozygous for a single GH gene allele, heterozygous or homozygous for a duplication in the GH gene. The pituitaries of lean sheep of all three GH genotypes were significantly heavier than those of fat sheep, but there were no pituitary weight differences between GH genotypes. No significant lean-fat selection line- or GH genotype-specific differences were measured in pituitary GH concentration. However there was a significant increase (P < 0.01) in the total pituitary content of GH in lean compared with fat animals and a significant interaction between GH genotype and lean-fat selection line (P < 0.05) was noted for GH content. No significant differences were measured in the relative concentration of GH mRNA, suggesting that the ratio of GH mRNA per mg total cellular RNA remained constant across lean-fat selection line and GH genotype. We conclude that the pituitary glands of Coopworth sheep selected for low backfat depth (lean) are bigger and have an increased GH content, but appear to contain similar concentrations of GH mRNA and immunoreactive GH as the pituitaries of fat sheep. The presence of the GH gene duplication in sheep has little measurable effect on the expression and storage of GH in the pituitary.