Client reflections on confirmation and disconfirmation of expectations in cognitive behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder with and without motivational interviewing

Potential advantages of combining randomized controlled trials with qualitative research in mood and anxiety disorders - A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of mood and anxiety disorders employ solely quantitative methods. Supplementing quantitative data with qualitative methods, a so-called mixed-method approach, would seem useful, however this area has not been rigorously reviewed. We undertook a systematic review of RCTs of mood and anxiety disorders that employed concurrent quantitative data collection and qualitative methods exploring the participants' perspective, with the aim of 1. determining the number of such studies, 2. describing study characteristics, and 3. identifying potential advantages of a mixed-method approach.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search for RCTs of mood and anxiety disorders, concurrently applying quantitative and qualitative methods, was conducted using EMBASE, PsycINFO and Pubmed, from their inception to February 2021. Categories of potential advantages of this mixed method approach were developed.

RESULTS

A total of 45 RCTs were included. The qualitative components typically included 10-40 participants, mostly consisting of interviews after the intervention. The majority of papers did not state a specific rationale for using a mixed method approach. Four categories of advantages emerged: 1. determine acceptability/feasibility, 2. investigate efficacy, 3. inform implementation in clinical practice and 4. generate new hypotheses based on the combination of quantitative and qualitative data.

LIMITATIONS

Lack of cross-referencing and consistent terminology challenged identification of relevant publications.

CONCLUSION

There are a number of potential advantages of applying mixed method approaches in RCTs within psychiatric research. Intentional consideration of such advantages early in trial design may increase the likelihood of gaining added value.

Psychotherapeutic treatments for generalized anxiety disorder: cognitive and behavioral therapies, enhancement strategies, and emerging efforts

INTRODUCTION

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is common and disabling. Different versions of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) have been tested, but no treatment works for everyone. Therefore, researchers have attempted approaches to enhance CBT.

AREAS COVERED

The current narrative review examines meta-analyses and individual trials of CBT-based treatments for GAD. We focus on CBT and its cognitive and behavioral components as well as efforts to enhance CBT and its dissemination and generalizability. Enhancement efforts included interpersonal and emotional processing therapy, mindfulness-based CBT, emotion regulation therapy, intolerance of uncertainty therapy, the unified protocol, metacognitive therapy, motivational interviewing, and contrast avoidance targeted treatment. Emerging strategies to enhance dissemination have focused on technologically based treatments. Attempts at generalizability have included examination of efficacy within diverse racial and ethnic groups.

EXPERT OPINION

We conclude that CBT is efficacious, and a number of enhancement efforts have shown some promise in improving upon CBT in single trials. However, more research is needed, particularly efforts to determine which enhancements work best for which individuals and what are the mechanisms of change. Furthermore, few technological interventions have been compared to active treatments. Finally, much more attention needs to be paid to ethnic and racial diversity in randomized controlled trials.

Framing the process in the implementation of care for people with generalized anxiety disorder in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Background

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most common mental disorders in primary care (PC). GAD has low remission and high relapse rates over long follow-up periods. Qualitative evidence was synthesized to understand the implementation of care and treatment options for people with GAD in PC.

Methods

Research published from 2008 to September 2020 was searched in five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, WOS and PsycArticles). Studies that used qualitative methods for data collection and analysis to investigate the implementation of care and treatment options for people with GAD in PC and outpatient settings were included. Non-qualitative studies, mixed methods studies that did not separately report qualitative findings and studies in languages other than English or Spanish were excluded. We used the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQual) framework to assess the overall confidence in the findings.

Results

The results with a moderate level of confidence showed that the trajectory of care for people with GAD in PC and outpatient settings is long and fluctuates over time, involving multiple difficulties in accessing and maintaining initial treatment or successive treatment options. In addition, there are wide variations in the preferences for and acceptability of different treatment options. The results with a high level of confidence indicated that more information on GAD and its treatment options is needed for PC practitioners, GAD patients and their carers. The results with a low level of confidence suggested that patients use antidepressants for longer than recommended and that the interruption of treatment is not usually planned.

Conclusions

Initial resistance to new treatments among people with GAD can make access and adherence to treatment difficult. Improving care may require patients to be informed of possible trajectories in stepped care pathways before the initiation of treatment so they are aware that they may need to try a number of options until the most effective treatment for them is found. Increased awareness of and information materials on GAD may facilitate both appropriate diagnosis and long-term care.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-020-01307-6.

'I have anxiety, but I have values and preferences' Experiences of users with generalized anxiety disorder: A qualitative study

To understand the experience and perceptions of people diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder, along the whole process and their role through the decision-making process for their treatment. A qualitative study through focus groups composed of people diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder was carried out. Content analysis was carried out to explore the most representative issues. Five thematic categories were identified: onset of the disorder, symptoms and course; daily life with the disorder; coping with the disorder; demand of healthcare for anxiety, and treatment options and decision-making. Most of the patients reported physical symptoms of anxiety. The majority of participants perceived little social support from their environment and occupational interferences. Coping seems to differ among participant that have recovered or not recovered. The involvement of users with generalized anxiety disorder was scarce, and pharmacological treatment was always the first option offered. There is scarce orientation to elicit preferences and values of patients across the process of care for people with generalized anxiety disorder. The consequence is a biased predisposition of the healthcare system to provide pharmacological treatment as the first option and ignore the perspective of patients on how to cope with their illness.