A Method for Measuring the Binding Affinity and Capacity of Growth Hormone Binding Protein in Human Serum Using FPLC to Separate Bound and Free Ligand

Growth hormone binding protein 2001

The present state of knowledge about growth hormone binding proteins (GHBP) is reviewed, with particular emphasis on the high affinity GHBP, which represents the circulating ectodomain of the growth hormone receptor (GHR). GHBP is conserved through vertebrate evolution, is produced in many tissues (especially liver) by either alternative GHR mRNA splicing (rodents) or by proteolytic cleavage from the GHR (humans, rabbits and several other species). The metalloprotease TACE (tumor necrosis factor-alpha converting enzyme) is the likely enzyme responsible for cleavage, but the structural requirements for TACE recognition or catalysis, and hence the precise cleavage point in the GHR, are unknown. GHBP is widely distributed in biological fluids, with marked concentration differences amongst them. GHBP binds about half of the circulating GH under basal conditions but is easily saturated at high GH levels; it subserves complex functions, including a circulating buffer/reservoir function for GH, prolongation of plasma GH half-life, competition with GHRs for GH, and probably unproductive heterodimer formation with the GHR. The net effect of these partly enhancing and partly inhibitory functions on GH action in vivo is complex and difficult to ascertain. Serum GHBP levels roughly parallel GHR expression (particularly in liver) through the life span, with very low levels in fetal life, upregulation to adult levels during childhood, and decline in senescence. Rodent pregnancy is associated with a massive increase in GHBP expression. Although the regulation of GHBP expression/production is not necessarily tightly linked to GHR expression, in general, low GHBP levels occur in conditions associated with GH resistance (e.g., malnutrition, uncontrolled diabetes, catabolic states, renal failure, hypothyroidism). Conversely, obesity, a condition with enhanced GH responsivity, is associated with elevated GHBP levels. This suggests that in many (but not all) instances of abnormal GH action, the GHBP level reflects GHR status. Laron syndrome (genetic GHR deficiency/dysfunction due to mutations in the GHR gene) is associated with low or undetectable GHBP in 75-80% of patients; GHBP measurement can therefore be used diagnostically. Depending on the design of assays for serum GH, endogenous GHBP may interfere to varying degrees, and GH assays should be individually validated and optimized in this regard. The ultimate biological role and physiological significance of the GHBP remain to be established.

Intersubject responsiveness of high-affinity growth hormone (GH)-binding protein (GHBP) to long-term GH replacement therapy

In adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD) syndrome responsiveness to GH replacement therapy is reported to vary considerably. The underlying mechanisms, however, are not well understood. The aim of this study was to investigate which baseline variables determine the reported variable intersubject responsiveness of high-affinity GH-binding protein (GHBP) to GH replacement therapy. In the setting of a double blind study over 12 months with placebo control over the first 6 months, we analyzed the interrelationship between a number of baseline variables, which vary considerably amongst subjects, and the GHBP response to GH replacement in 31 GHD adults (21 males and 10 females). The following variables were investigated: age, gender, duration of GHD, body composition, serum levels of high-affinity GHBP, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3). The results showed that in the 6 months treated group of 16 patients (11 males, 5 females), serum IGF-1 increased from 87 ng/ml (range: 26 to 173) to 250 (range: 62 to 467) (p<0.01) and GHBP increased from 1,302 pmol/l (range: 845 to 1,m960) to 1418 (range: 941 to 2,025) (p=0.04). Both parameters showed a significant time effect (within-subjects) (p<0.001). In the 12 months treated group of 15 patients (10 males, 5 females), serum IGF-1 increased from 92 ng/ml (range: 20 to 180) to 272 (range: 45 to 491) (p<0.01), whereas GHBP did not show a significant change: from 1,186 pmol/l (range: 660 to 1,690) to 1,252 (range: 580 to 1,890) (p=0.87). Also no significant time effect (within-subjects) was observed for GHBP (p=0.06). Step-wise multiple regression analyses revealed that during the 6 months placebo period baseline GHBP explained 83% of the variance in post-placebo GHBP, whereas the variance in post-treatment GHBP could be accurately predicted (adjusted R2=0.93) from baseline GHBP and body fat mass, irrespective of the duration of GH treatment. No other baseline variables contributed independently to the GHBP response, with the exception of IGFBP-3, which showed a small, but significant contribution in females, but not in males. These findings indicate that the variable intersubject responsiveness of GHBP to GH replacement therapy is mainly due to differences in baseline body fat mass amongst adult GHD patients, and that in female patients a relatively low baseline IGFBP-3 contributes to a rise in serum GHBP after GH treatment. The clinical relevance of measuring GHBP in adult GHD patients is limited to the first screening step to diagnose GHD, because long-term GH therapy tends to restore serum GHBP to pretreatment levels.

Influence of obesity and body fat distribution on growth hormone kinetics in humans

We studied the kinetics of exogenous recombinant 22-kDa human growth hormone (rhGH) in premenopausal women with upper body obesity (UBO), lower body obesity (LBO), or normal body weight. A bolus of 100 mU rhGH was administered during a continuous infusion of somatostatin to suppress endogenous GH secretion. GH kinetics were investigated with noncompartmental analysis of plasma GH curves. GH peak values in response to GH infusion and plasma half-life of GH were not significantly different between normal weight and obese subjects. In contrast, GH clearance was 33% higher in LBO women and 51% higher in UBO women compared with clearance in normal weight controls. The difference in clearance between LBO and UBO was not statistically significant. Altered GH clearance characteristics contribute to low circulating GH levels in obese humans. Body fat distribution does not appear to affect GH kinetics.

Activity of GH/IGF-I axis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVE

There is evidence showing that GH and IGF-I have specific receptors in the heart and that these hormones are able to promote cardiac remodelling and inotropism. It has been reported that patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) benefit from treatment with rhGH showing a striking increase in cardiac contractility. However, until now, the activity of GH/IGF-I axis in DCM has never been clearly assessed.

PATIENTS

To clarify this point, we enrolled 39 patients with idiopathic or post-ischaemic DCM (36 M/3 F; age (mean +/- S.D.) 55.3 +/- 9.0 years; BMI: 25.3 +/- 3.2 kg/m2; New York Heart Association class (NYHA) I/2, II/19, III/15, IV/3) and 42 age-matched controls (CS, 38 M/4 F; age 56.0 +/- 7.8 years; BMI: 24.9 +/- 1.5 kg/m2). DCM patients were characterized by a left-ventricular diastolic diameter of 73.8 +/- 8.3 mm, a shortening fraction of 15.9 +/- 6.4% and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 25.1 +/- 8.7%. In all subjects clinical and biochemical indices of renal and hepatic function as well as nutritional parameters were in the normal range.

MEASUREMENTS

In both groups we studied: a) IGF-I levels in basal conditions and after administration of low rhGH doses for 4 days (5.0 or 10.0 mu/kg/day x 4 days); b) the acute GH-response to GHRH (1.0 mu/kg i.v.) or hexarelin (HEX, 2.0 mu/kg i.v.), a peptidyl GH secretagogue (GHRP); c) mean GH concentration (mGHc) over 10 h sampling (every 20 min) from 2200 h to 0800 h.

RESULTS

Basal IGF-I levels in DCM were lower (P = 0.000039) than in CS (135.2 +/- 46.8 vs. 193.7 +/- 63.7 mu/l), whereas, basal IGFBP-3 and GHBP2 levels in DCM and CS were similar (2.5 +/- 1.3 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.5 mg/l and 25.3 +/- 3.6 vs. 28.3 +/- 5.0%; P = 0.95 and P = 0.085, respectively). After 4 days of 5.0 mu/kg/day rhGH administration, IGF-I levels in DCM (215.4 +/- 82.0 mu/l; P = 0.0023 vs. baseline) remained lower (P = 0.027) than those in CS (280.0 +/- 80.7 mu/l; P = 0.000080 vs. baseline). After 10.0 mu/kg/day for 4 days, IGF-I levels in DCM (297.2 +/- 109.2 mu/l; P = 0.0033 vs. baseline) were similar (P = 0.76) to those in CS (310.9 +/- 81.7 mu/l; P = 0.000060 vs. baseline). The GH response to GHRH in DCM was lower (P = 0.0022) than that in CS (hAUC0-120: 192.0 +/- 177.3 vs. 345.3 +/- 191.1 mu/l/h) whereas that to HEX in DCM and CS was similar (611.0 +/- 437.5 vs. 535.4 +/- 302.8 mu/l/h; P = 0.95). Within the DCM group, basal and rhGH-stimulated IGF-levels as wel as the GH response to GHRH or HEX were not different among NYHA classes and did not show any correlation with ECHO parameters. The mGHc in DCM (1.0 +/- 0.5 mu/l) was similar (P = 0.57) to that in CS (0.9 = 0.7 mu/l).

CONCLUSIONS

Our present data demonstrate that in dilated cardiomyopathy patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction basal IGF-I levels are reduced whereas the IGF-I response to low rhGH doses is preserved. These findings suggest a normal peripheral GH sensitivity in dilated cardiomyopathy. On the other hand, though nocturnal mean GH concentration in dilated cardiomyopathy patients is similar to that in normal subjects, the somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH, but not that to hexarelin, is reduced. Thus, subtle alterations in the activity of GH/IGF-I axis are present in dilated cardiomyopathy.

High-affinity growth hormone (GH)-binding protein (GHBP), body fat mass, and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 predict the GHBP response to GH therapy in adult GH deficiency syndrome

The study objective was to investigate which baseline factors can accurately predict plasma high-affinity growth hormone (GH)-binding protein (GHBP) levels after GH replacement therapy in patients with GH deficiency (GHD). The study group consisted of 36 GHD patients (22 men and 14 women; mean age, 43.1 years; (range, 21 to 60) known to have adult-onset GHD for many years (range, 4 to 22). They were randomly divided into a GH-treated group (n = 19) and a placebo group (n = 17). Body composition (assessed by bioelectrical impendance analysis [BIA]), plasma GHBP (fast protein liquid chromatography [FPLC] size-exclusion gel chromatography), insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), and IGF-binding protein-3 ([IGFBP-3] radioimmunoassays) were measured before and after 6 months. A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis with the plasma GHBP level after 6 months as the dependent variable was used to unravel significant explanatory (or predictor) variables. In contrast to placebo therapy, GH replacement therapy increased the mean plasma levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 to the normal range, whereas a small but statistically significant increase in plasma GHBP was observed. The combination of baseline plasma GHBP, body fat mass, and IGFBP-3 predicts posttreatment GHBP levels accurately (adjusted R2 = .97), indicating that baseline variables such as age, gender, fat-free mass, and IGF-I have no contribution. Furthermore, reliability analysis showed that the observed and predicted values for GHBP fit a strict parallel model. These findings indicate that the variations in body fat mass and IGFBP-3 among adult GHD subjects explain the reported variable response of GHBP to GH replacement therapy.

Analytical performance and clinical usefulness of two binding assays for growth hormone binding protein (GHBP) measurement: high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-gel filtration and dextran-coated charcoal adsorption

We compared two binding assays for growth hormone binding protein (GHBP) measurements, which differ in the method of bound and free GH separation: HPLC-gel filtration or dextran coated-charcoal adsorption (DCC). Two pools of sera (high and medium GHBP activity) were used for quality-control assessment. Moreover, 62 samples from 34 children and 28 adults with different nutritional status were studied. Total, between- and intra-iodination coefficients of variation (CVs) from the two methods were not different. Although percentage binding measured in the pool sera significantly differed, the concentrations assessed by Scatchard plot were comparable. Results obtained by the two methods in the 62 sera were significantly correlated (r = 0.77, P < 0.001). With both methods GHBP activity correlated with chronological age and body mass index (BMI) and differed among groups with different nutritional status. Although HPLC and DCC separation methods for GHBP measurement differ in their practicability, our study demonstrates that performance and the clinical usefulness of the two methods are comparable.

Visceral adipose tissue is associated with circulating high affinity growth hormone-binding protein

Recent data show that body fat distribution, specifically visceral fat accumulation, is associated with the regulation of GH secretion. To our knowledge no studies have been performed with regard to the relationship between plasma high affinity GH-binding protein (GHBP) levels and fat distribution in humans. To address this question, we measured plasma GHBP and insulin-like growth factor I levels as well as visceral, sc abdominal, and hip adipose tissue (AT) areas by using magnetic resonance imaging scanning in 12 patients with GH deficiency (GHD) and in 12 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects. The GHD patients were subsequently treated with GH replacement therapy. Regardless of the GH status of the subjects, body mass index and visceral AT area were positively correlated to plasma GHBP (r = 0.70; P < 0.01 and r = 0.73; P < 0.01, respectively), whereas the sc AT areas at the abdominal level tended to correlate positively with GHBP levels, but did not reach significance (r = 0.44; P = 0.07). The sc AT areas at the hip level were not correlated with plasma GHBP levels. In the GHD patients the pretreatment visceral and abdominal sc AT areas were positively correlated with the change in GHBP levels after GH replacement (r = 0.82; P < 0.01 and r = 0.75; P < 0.01, respectively). The pretreatment sc AT area at the hip level was not associated with the therapy-induced changes in plasma GHBP (r = 0.28; P > 0.10). In summary, this study shows that visceral fat is associated with circulating GHBP levels, suggesting that visceral fat mass may be involved in the regulation of the plasma GHBP level. Further, the amount of abdominal fat in GHD patients may partially determine the plasma GHBP response to GH replacement therapy.

High affinity growth hormone binding protein in plasma of patients with acromegaly and the effect of octreotide treatment

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of plasma GH-levels on the high affinity growth hormone binding protein (GHBP).

PATIENTS

We studied plasma samples of eight patients with acromegaly and eight age and sex matched healthy subjects.

DESIGN

Patients with acromegaly were treated with octreotide administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion. Levels of growth hormone binding protein (GHBP) were measured in plasma samples before therapy and 3, 6 and 12 months after starting treatment. During this period, octreotide was administered in doses of 300-800 micrograms/day. The mean dose per patient over the study period ranged from 300 to 575 micrograms/24 h. The GHBP levels of patients with acromegaly were compared with those in the healthy subjects.

MEASUREMENTS

Bound and free 125I-GH in plasma were measured using FPLC gel chromatography on a Superose 12 column, after an overnight incubation period. The binding data were used for a Scatchard plot analysis. Wilcoxon's signed rank test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

We found lower GHBP levels in acromegalic patients (P = 0.01) than in the control subjects. Octreotide treatment resulted in IGF-I levels < 300 micrograms/l in four patients. In these patients GHBP levels increased.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that growth hormone binding protein levels are down regulated in acromegaly, indicating an important role for GH in the regulation of this protein.