Identifying the Physical and Mental Healthcare Needs of Opioid Treatment Program Clients

Occurrence of hypertension among patients with opioid use disorder in methadone maintenance treatment

BACKGROUND

Patients in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) may develop age-related medical problems, but hypertension (HTN) proportion and its occurrence during MMT have not been studied yet. We aimed to evaluate changes in blood pressure (BP) during MMT and characterize current HTN.

METHODS

Of all 1098 ever admitted MMT patients, those with ≥2 BP follow-up measures were included ( n  = 516), of them all current patients ( N  = 245) tested for HTN (systolic BP ≥140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥90 were detected twice (one week apart) were considered as affected with HTN. Current and earliest during the first, and latest year in MMT of body mass index (BMI), BP, methadone dose and serum level, and drugs in urine were analyzed.

RESULTS

HTN was detected in 89(36.3%) of the current patients. The HTN and non-HTN groups did not differ by sex ( P  = 0.6), age ( P  = 0.2), and duration in MMT ( P  = 0.6), but had higher BMI (27.9 ± 5.2 vs. 25.6 ± 5.2, respectively, P  = 0.001) and fewer had positive urine test findings for any substance (31.5% vs. 44.9%, P  = 0.04). Comparing their earliest measures (before 11.9 ± 5.8 years), BP and BMI increased more among the hypertensive group, independent of methadone dose and serum levels, which significantly reduced over the years. No drug abuse was associated with increased BMI and BP.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight gain was associated with BP elevation and characterized patients who succeeded in drug abstinence during MMT. Healthy nutrition education at admission to MMT may reduce the incidence of weight gain and HTN, therefore identifying HTN and offering treatment for this highly prevalent life-threatening condition among middle-age and older patients in MMT is recommended.

What features of drug treatment programs help, or not, with access? a qualitative study of the perspectives of family members and community-based organization staff in Atlantic Canada

BACKGROUND

Withdrawal management and opioid agonist treatment (OAT) programs help to reduce some of the harms experienced by people who use substances (PWUS). There is literature on how features of drug treatment programs (e.g., policies and practices) are helpful, or not helpful, to PWUS when seeking access to, or in, treatment. There is, however, relatively little literature based on the perspectives of family members/family of choice of PWUS and community-based organization staff within the context of Atlantic Canada. This paper explored the perspectives of these two groups on what was helpful, or not, about drug treatment programs in Atlantic Canada in terms of supporting access to, and retention in, treatment.

METHODS

One-on-one qualitative telephone interviews were conducted in 2020 with the two groups. Interviews focused on government-funded withdrawal management and OAT programs. Data were coded using a qualitative data management program (ATLAS.ti) and analyzed inductively for key themes/subthemes using grounded theory techniques.

RESULTS

Fifteen family members/family of choice and 16 community-based organization staff members participated (n = 31). Participants spoke about features of drug treatment programs in various places, and noted features that were perceived as helpful (e.g., quick access), as well as not helpful (e.g., wait times, programs located far from where PWUS live). Some participants provided their perceptions of how PWUS felt when seeking or accessing treatment. A number of participants reported taking various actions to help support access to treatment, including providing transportation to programs. A few participants also provided suggestions for change to help support access and retention such as better alignment of mental health and addiction systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants highlighted several helpful and not helpful features of drug treatment programs in terms of supporting treatment access and retention. Previous studies with PWUS and in other places have reported similar features, some of which (e.g., wait times) have been reported for many years. Changes are needed to reduce barriers to access and retention including the changes recommended by study participants. It is critical that the voices of key groups, (including PWUS) are heard to ensure treatment programs in all places support access and retention.

Increases in primary opioid use disorder diagnoses co-occurring with anxiety or depressive disorder diagnoses in mental health treatment in the United States, 2015-2019

BACKGROUND

Opioid use disorders (OUDs) often co-occur with anxiety and depressive disorders. While the proportion of mental health (MH) treatment facilities providing substance use treatment has increased, the proportion of these facilities able to simultaneously treat MH and substance use decreased. This warrants investigation into the integrated treatment needs of persons with a primary OUD diagnosis treated in MH treatment facilities.

METHODS

Using the Mental Health Client Level Data, we examined a sample of N = 83,975 adults with OUD as their primary diagnosis who received treatment from a MH treatment facility in the United States from 2015 to 2019. Joinpoint regression was used to examine annual trends of the number of individuals with co-occurring anxiety or depression diagnoses.

RESULTS

Most of the sample were men (53.7%) and received treatment in a community-based program (93.3%). Approximately 17% of the sample had either an anxiety or depressive disorder diagnosis. Approximately 9% of our sample had an anxiety disorder diagnosis, and 10% had a depressive disorder diagnosis. An increase in the number of individuals with a co-occurring anxiety disorder diagnosis from 2015 to 2019 was identified (annual percent change (APC) = 61.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) = [10.0, 136.9]; p =.029). An increase in the number of individuals with a co-occurring depressive disorder diagnosis from 2015 to 2019 was identified (APC = 39.0; 95% CI = [7.4; 79.9]; p =.027).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights increases in adults receiving MH treatment for OUD having co-occurring anxiety or depression diagnoses, furthering the importance of integrated dual disorder treatment.

Barriers to Assessing and Treating Trauma in Primary Care and Opportunities for Improvement: Perspectives from Prescribers of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder

Background: Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) is a best practice for treating individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD), and primary care-based MOUD management can reduce treatment barriers among OUD patients. Individuals with OUD experience disproportionately high rates of trauma and violence, highlighting the importance of addressing trauma, mental health, and substance use concurrently. However, clear guidelines for trauma-informed treatment in a primary care setting remain poorly established. Methods: A qualitative approach was engaged to explore primary care providers' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to assessing and treating trauma among MOUD patients. Twenty in-depth interviews were conducted in 2021 with Baltimore-based MOUD prescribers, including primary care physicians and nurse practitioners. Interview questions assessed experiences with identifying and treating trauma among MOUD patients, including challenges and opportunities. Results: Providers reported extensive histories of trauma experienced by MOUD patients. Barriers to addressing trauma include a lack of standardized protocols/procedures for identifying trauma, insufficient training/time to assess and treat trauma, and the limited availability of external mental health providers and specialty services. Opportunities included building strong, mutually respectful patient-provider relationships, providing individualized, person-centered care, and establishing connections to coordinated multidisciplinary treatment networks. Conclusions: MOUD treatment within primary care is an important way to increase OUD treatment access, but clearer standards are needed for the treatment of trauma within this patient population. These findings demonstrate opportunities to improve standards and systems such that primary care providers are better equipped to assess and treat the complex histories of trauma experienced by individuals with OUD.