Major difference in particle size, minor difference in release profile: a case study of solid lipid nanoparticles

A Comparative Mathematical Analysis of Drug Release from Lipid-Based Nanoparticles

Mathematical modeling of drug release from drug delivery systems is crucial for understanding and optimizing formulations. This research provides a comparative mathematical analysis of drug release from lipid-based nanoparticles. Drug release profiles from various types of lipid nanoparticles, including liposomes, nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs), solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), and nano/micro-emulsions (NEMs/MEMs), were extracted from the literature and used to assess the suitability of eight conventional mathematical release models. For each dataset, several metrics were calculated, including the coefficient of determination (R2), adjusted R2, the number of errors below certain thresholds (5%, 10%, 12%, and 20%), Akaike information criterion (AIC), regression sum square (RSS), regression mean square (RMS), residual sum of square (rSS), and residual mean square (rMS). The Korsmeyer-Peppas model ranked highest among the evaluated models, with the highest adjusted R2 values of 0.95 for NLCs and 0.93 for other liposomal drug delivery systems. The Weibull model ranked second, with adjusted R2 values of 0.92 for liposomal systems, 0.94 for SLNs, and 0.82 for NEMs/MEMs. Thus, these two models appear to be more effective in forecasting and characterizing the release of lipid nanoparticle drugs, potentially making them more suitable for upcoming research endeavors.

Evaluation of New Folate Receptor-mediated Mitoxantrone Targeting Liposomes In Vitro

Background: Ligand-mediated liposomes targeting folate receptors (FRs) that are overexpressed on the surface of tumor cells may improve drug delivery. However, the properties of liposomes also affect cellular uptake and drug release.

Objective: Mitoxantrone folate targeted liposomes were prepared to increase the enrichment of drugs in tumor cells and improve the therapeutic index of drugs by changing the route of drug administration.

Methods: Liposomes were prepared with optimized formulation, including mitoxantrone folatetargeted small unilamellar liposome (MIT-FSL), mitoxantrone folate-free small unilamellar liposome (MIT-SL), mitoxantrone folate-targeted large unilamellar liposome (MIT-FLL), mitoxantrone folate-free large unilamellar liposomes (MIT-LL). Cells with different levels of folate alpha receptor (FRα) expression were used to study the differences in the enrichment of liposomes, the killing effect on tumor cells, and their ability to overcome multidrug resistance.

The results of the drug release experiment showed that the particle size of liposomes affected their release behavior. Large single-compartment liposomes could hardly be effectively released, while small single-compartment liposomes could be effectively released, MIT-FSL vs MIT-FLL and MIT-SL vs MIT-LL had significant differences in the drug release rate (P<0.0005). Cell uptake experiments results indicated that the ability of liposomes to enter folic acid receptor-expressing tumor cells could be improved after modification of folic acid ligands on the surface of liposomes and it was related to the expression of folate receptors on the cell surface. There were significant differences in cell uptake rates (p<0.0005) for cells with high FRα expression (SPC-A-1 cells), when MIT-FSL vs MIT-SL and MIT-FLL vs MIT-LL. For cells with low FRα expression (MCF-7 cells), their cell uptake rates were still different (p<0.05), but less pronounced than in SPC-A-1 cells. The results of the cell inhibition experiment suggest that MIT-FLL and MIT-LL had no inhibitory effect on cells, MIT-FSL had a significant inhibitory effect on cells and its IC50 value was calculated to be 4502.4 ng/mL, MIT-SL also had an inhibitory effect, and its IC50 value was 25092.1 ng/mL, there was a statistical difference (p<0.05), MIT-FSL had a higher inhibitory rate than MIT-SL at the same drug concentration. Afterward, we did an inhibitory experiment of different MIT-loaded nanoparticles on MCF-7 cells compared to the drug-resistant cells (ADR), Observing the cell growth inhibition curve, both MIT-FSL and MIT-SL can inhibit the growth of MCF-7 and MCF-7/ADR cells. For MCF- 7 cells, at the same concentration, there is little difference between the inhibition rate of MITFSL and MIT-SL, but for MCF-7/ADR, the inhibition rate of MIT-FSL was significantly higher than that of MIT-SL at the same concentration (P<0.05).

Conclusion: By modifying folic acid on the surface of liposomes, tumor cells with high expression of folic acid receptors can be effectively targeted, thereby increasing the enrichment of intracellular drugs and improving efficacy. It can also change the delivery pathway, increase the amount of drug entering resistant tumor cells, and overcome resistance.

.

Bedaquiline-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles Drug Delivery in the Management of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) mortality and new case rates are both on the rise. Most patients have fewer treatment options accessible due to side effects from drugs and the emergence of drug resistance. Bedaquiline (BQ), a drug licensed by the FDA to treat tuberculosis (TB), has demonstrated highly effective anti-cancer properties in the past. However, it is difficult to transport the biological barriers because of their limited solubility in water. Our study developed a UPLC method whose calibration curves showed linearity in the range of 5 ng/mL to 500 ng/mL. The UPLC method was developed with a retention time of 1.42 and high accuracy and precision. Its LOQ and LOD were observed to be 10 ng/mL and 5 ng/mL, respectively, whereas in the formulation, capmul MCM C10, Poloxamer 188, and PL90G were selected as solid lipids, surfactants, and co-surfactants, respectively, in the development of SLN. To combat NSCLC, we developed solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) loaded with BQ, whereas BQ suspension is prepared by the trituration method using acacia powder, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, polyvinyl acrylic acid, and BQ. The developed and optimized BQ-SLN3 has a particle size of 144 nm and a zeta potential of (-) 16.3 mV. whereas BQ-loaded SLN3 has observed entrapment efficiency (EE) and loading capacity (LC) of 92.05% and 13.33%, respectively. Further, BQ-loaded suspension revealed a particle size of 1180 nm, a PDI of 0.25, and a zeta potential of -0.0668. whereas the EE and LC of BQ-loaded suspension were revealed to be 88.89% and 11.43%, respectively. The BQ-SLN3 exhibited insignificant variation in particle size, homogeneous dispersion, zeta potential, EE, and LC and remained stable over 90 days of storage at 25 °C/60% RH, whereas at 40 °C/75% RH, BQ-SLN3 observed significant variation in the above-mentioned parameters and remained unstable over 90 days of storage. Meanwhile, the BQ suspension at both 25 °C (60% RH) and 40 °C (75% RH) was found to be stable up to 90 days. The optimized BQ-SLN3 and BQ-suspension were in vitro gastrointestinally stable at pH 1.2 and 6.8, respectively. The in vitro drug release of BQ-SLN3 showed 98.19% up to 12 h at pH 7.2 whereas BQ suspensions observed only 40% drug release up to 4 h at pH 7.2 and maximum drug release of >99% within 4 h at pH 4.0. The mathematical modeling of BQ-SLN3 followed first-order release kinetics followed by a non-Fickian diffusion mechanism. After 24 to 72 h, the IC50 value of BQ-SLN3 was 3.46-fold lower than that of the BQ suspension, whereas the blank SLN observed cell viability of 98.01% and an IC50 of 120 g/mL at the end of 72 h. The bioavailability and higher biodistribution of BQ-SLN3 in the lung tumor were also shown to be greater than those of the BQ suspension. The effects of BQ-SLN3 on antioxidant enzymes, including MDA, SOD, CAT, GSH, and GR, in the treated group were significantly improved and reached the level nearest to that of the control group of rats over the cancer group of rats and the BQ suspension-treated group of rats. Moreover, the pharmacodynamic activity resulted in greater tumor volume and tumor weight reduction by BQ-SLN3 over the BQ suspension-treated group. As far as we are aware, this is the first research to look at the potential of SLN as a repurposed oral drug delivery, and the results suggest that BQ-loaded SLN3 is a better approach for NSCLC due to its better action potential.

Improved uptake and bioavailability of cinnamaldehyde via solid lipid nanoparticles for oral delivery

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this experiment was to explore the effect of Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) on improving the oral absorption and bioavailability of cinnamaldehyde (CA).

METHODS

CA-SLNs were prepared by high-pressure homogenization and characterized by particle size, entrapment efficiency, and morphology, thermal behavior and attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR). In vitro characteristics of release, stability experiments, cytotoxicity, uptake and transport across Caco-2 cell monolayer of CA-SLNs were studied as well. In addition, CA-SLNs underwent pharmacokinetic and gastrointestinal mucosal irritation studies in rats.

RESULTS

CA-SLNs exhibited a spherical shape with a particle size of 44.57 ± 0.27 nm, zeta potential of -27.66 ± 1.9 mV and entrapment efficiency of 83.63% ± 2.16%. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and ATR-FTIR confirmed that CA was well encapsulated. In vitro release of CA-SLNs displayed that most of the drug (90.77% ± 5%) was released in the phosphate buffer, and only a small amount of drug (18.55% ± 5%) was released in the HCl buffer. CA-SLNs were taken up by an energy-dependent, endocytic mechanism mediated by caveolae mediated endocytosis across Caco-2 cells. The CA permeation through Caco-2 cell was facilitated by CA-SLNs. The outcome of the gastrointestinal irritation test demonstrated that CA-SLNs had no irritation to the rats' intestines. Compared with CA dispersions, incorporation of SLNs increased the oral bioavailability of CA more than 1.69-fold.

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that CA-SLNs improved the absorption across Caco-2 cell model and improved the oral administration bioavailability of CA in rats.