CARES: A Community-wide Collaboration Identifies Super-utilizers and Reduces Their 9-1-1 Call, Emergency Department, and Hospital Visit Rates

Evaluation of an EMS-based community paramedic pilot program to reduce frequency of 9-1-1 calls among high utilizers

Background - Many community paramedic interventions aim to reduce unnecessary emergency department visits among high utilizers of acute care, but fewer focus specifically on reducing summons for emergency medical services (EMS). We implemented an EMS-based pilot program that identified high utilizers of 9-1-1 and facilitated community paramedic outreach encounters to understand and address potentially unnecessary 9-1-1 calls. This study compares the pre- and post-intervention incidence rate of 9-1-1 calls among program participants.Methods - This retrospective evaluation was conducted using pilot data from a single U.S. EMS agency that responds to approximately 100,000 9-1-1 calls annually. High utilizers, defined as individuals with ≥3 9-1-1 calls in 90 days, were identified for recruitment between February 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019. community paramedics recruited participants via phone and then conducted home visits to assist them with navigation away from unnecessary 9-1-1 use. Dispatch data from September 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019 were used to compute the incidence rate of 9-1-1 calls per 30 person-days of observation before and after the initial home visits.Results - Data from 108 program participants were analyzed. The majority were over the age of 50 (79%), and 33% completed more than one visit. Median person-days of observation before and after the initial home visit were 354 days and 132 days, respectively. Participants called 9-1-1 an average of 0.68 times per 30 person-days prior to the community paramedic intervention, and 0.51 times per 30 person-days after the intervention, which represents an overall mean decrease in 9-1-1 utilization of 25% (p < 0.001). Although a decrease in 9-1-1 utilization was observed in the majority of participants, the 9-1-1 call rate increased in 29% of participants. No statistically significant changes in 9-1-1 use were observed in participants who received more than one home visit or who were in the highest quartile of 9-1-1 use prior to the intervention.Conclusion - This pilot work demonstrates the feasibility of an EMS-based, community paramedic-only intervention to reduce unnecessary 9-1-1 calls and suggests that some modest reductions in EMS use may be achievable by dispatching community paramedics to conduct home visits with frequent users of 9-1-1.

Social media language of healthcare super-utilizers

An understanding of healthcare super-utilizers' online behaviors could better identify experiences to inform interventions. In this retrospective case-control study, we analyzed patients' social media posts to better understand their day-to-day behaviors and emotions expressed online. Patients included those receiving care in an urban academic emergency department who consented to share access to their historical Facebook posts and electronic health records. Super-utilizers were defined as patients with more than six visits to the Emergency Department (ED) in a year. We compared posts by super-utilizers with a matched group using propensity scoring based on age, gender and Charlson comorbidity index. Super-utilizers were more likely to post about confusion and negativity (D = .65, 95% CI-[.38, .95]), self-reflection (D = .63 [.35, .91]), avoidance (D = .62 [.34, .90]), swearing (D = .52 [.24, .79]), sleep (D = .60 [.32, .88]), seeking help and attention (D = .61 [.33, .89]), psychosomatic symptoms, (D = .49 [.22, .77]), self-agency (D = .56 [.29, .85]), anger (D = .51, [.24, .79]), stress (D = .46, [.19, .73]), and lonely expressions (D = .44, [.17, .71]). Insights from this study can potentially supplement offline community care services with online social support interventions considering the high engagement of super-utilizers on social media.

Interventions to Decrease Use in Prehospital and Emergency Care Settings Among Super-Utilizers in the United States: A Systematic Review

Interest in high users of acute care continues to grow as health care organizations look to deliver cost-effective and high-quality care to patients. Since “super-utilizers” of acute care are responsible for disproportionately high health care spending, many programs and interventions have been implemented to reduce medical care use and costs in this population. This article presents a systematic review of the peer-reviewed and grey literature on evaluations of interventions to decrease prehospital and emergency care use among U.S. super-utilizers. Forty-six distinct evaluations were included in the review. The most commonly evaluated intervention was case management. Although a number of interventions reported reductions in prehospital and emergency care utilization and costs, methodological and study design weaknesses—especially regression to the mean—were widespread and call into question reported positive findings. More high-quality research is needed to accurately assess the impact of interventions to reduce prehospital and emergency care use in the super-utilizer population.