1
|
Cohen M, DeVivo R, Gausche-Hill M, Schlesinger SA. Development and Deployment of a Pre-Planned Hospital Emergency Response Team (HERT) for EMS Augmentation: Case Report and Program Review. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2024:1-8. [PMID: 38842803 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2365333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
With the establishment and growth of the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) subspecialty, significant attention has been focused on clinical activities performed by EMS physicians in the out-of-hospital environment. An EMS fellowship includes special operations education to develop preparedness for responding to field situations requiring physician expertise. With only a thousand Board Certified EMS physicians in North America, EMS physicians may not be available 24 h per day to respond to field emergencies. Non-EMS physicians with minimal experience in prehospital or austere care may be called upon to respond to complex prehospital emergencies requiring advanced skills. The Los Angeles County EMS Agency implemented a policy in 1992 to establish Hospital Emergency Response Teams (HERT) as a regional resource to provide time-critical, specialized prehospital services within an EMS system. Activation of the HERT is rare, most frequently prompted by need for field amputation to enable extrication. We describe one such incident of a field intervention by HERT and detail the staffing, training, and equipment considerations within our large regional EMS system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Cohen
- Torrance Fire Department, Torrance, California
| | - Ryan DeVivo
- Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Department of Emergency Medicine, Torrance, California
- The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Marianne Gausche-Hill
- Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Department of Emergency Medicine, Torrance, California
- The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
- Los Angeles County EMS Agency, Santa Fe Springs, California
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Shira A Schlesinger
- Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Department of Emergency Medicine, Torrance, California
- The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
- Los Angeles County EMS Agency, Santa Fe Springs, California
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martin-Gill C, Lyng JW. Methodology for Evidence Evaluation and Reporting of the NAEMSP Trauma Compendium Position Statements. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2024; 28:660-665. [PMID: 38484123 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2329217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Position statements from national organizations commonly vary in methodology for the evaluation of existing literature and the development of recommendations. Recent national recommendations have highlighted important components for evidence-based guidelines that can be feasibly incorporated in the creation of position statements and their resource documents. We describe the methodology developed to guide the creation of a compendium of 16 trauma-related position statements led by NAEMSP and partner organizations. METHODS Each position statement group developed trauma-related topic areas, primarily guided by the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) framework. A structured literature search comprised of search terms aimed to identify relevant EMS and trauma-related scientific publications was performed for each topic area. Resource documents for each position statement included a description of the literature considered in forming recommendations, reported through evidence tables and a narrative description of the available literature. Where evidence was limited, consensus-based recommendations were developed using content experts and reviewed by the NAEMSP Standards and Clinical Practice Committee. CONCLUSION We report a standardized methodology for literature review and development of recommendations as part of a compendium of trauma-related position statements from NAEMSP and partner organizations. This methodology can serve as a template for future position statements with ongoing refinement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Martin-Gill
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - John W Lyng
- Department of Emergency Medicine, North Memorial Health Hospital & Level 1 Trauma Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gómez-Ríos MÁ, Sastre JA, Onrubia-Fuertes X, López T, Abad-Gurumeta A, Casans-Francés R, Gómez-Ríos D, Garzón JC, Martínez-Pons V, Casalderrey-Rivas M, Fernández-Vaquero MÁ, Martínez-Hurtado E, Martín-Larrauri R, Reviriego-Agudo L, Gutierrez-Couto U, García-Fernández J, Serrano-Moraza A, Rodríguez Martín LJ, Camacho Leis C, Espinosa Ramírez S, Fandiño Orgeira JM, Vázquez Lima MJ, Mayo-Yáñez M, Parente-Arias P, Sistiaga-Suárez JA, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Charco-Mora P. Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR), Spanish Society of Emergency and Emergency Medicine (SEMES) and Spanish Society of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (SEORL-CCC) Guideline for difficult airway management. Part II. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION 2024; 71:207-247. [PMID: 38340790 DOI: 10.1016/j.redare.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
The Airway Management section of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, and Pain Therapy (SEDAR), the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES), and the Spanish Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery (SEORL-CCC) present the Guide for the comprehensive management of difficult airway in adult patients. Its principles are focused on the human factors, cognitive processes for decision-making in critical situations, and optimization in the progression of strategies application to preserve adequate alveolar oxygenation in order to enhance safety and the quality of care. The document provides evidence-based recommendations, theoretical-educational tools, and implementation tools, mainly cognitive aids, applicable to airway management in the fields of anesthesiology, critical care, emergencies, and prehospital medicine. For this purpose, an extensive literature search was conducted following PRISMA-R guidelines and was analyzed using the GRADE methodology. Recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE methodology. Recommendations for sections with low-quality evidence were based on expert opinion through consensus reached via a Delphi questionnaire.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Á Gómez-Ríos
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
| | - J A Sastre
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - X Onrubia-Fuertes
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitary Dr Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - T López
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - A Abad-Gurumeta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Casans-Francés
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Elena, Valdemoro, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - J C Garzón
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - V Martínez-Pons
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - M Casalderrey-Rivas
- Department of Anesthesiology. Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
| | - M Á Fernández-Vaquero
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Martínez-Hurtado
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - L Reviriego-Agudo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| | - U Gutierrez-Couto
- Biblioteca, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol (CHUF), Ferrol, A Coruña, Spain
| | - J García-Fernández
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain; President of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR), Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - J M Fandiño Orgeira
- Emergency Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - M J Vázquez Lima
- Emergency Department, Hospital do Salnes, Vilagarcía de Arousa, Pontevedra, Spain; President of the Spanish Emergency Medicine Society (SEMES), Spain
| | - M Mayo-Yáñez
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head Neck Surgery, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - P Parente-Arias
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head Neck Surgery, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - J A Sistiaga-Suárez
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia, Gipuzkoa, Spain
| | - M Bernal-Sprekelsen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; President of the Spanish Society for Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery (SEORL-CCC), Spain
| | - P Charco-Mora
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Renberg M, Dahlberg M, Gellerfors M, Rostami E, Günther M. Prehospital and emergency department airway management of severe penetrating trauma in Sweden during the past decade. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2023; 31:85. [PMID: 38001526 PMCID: PMC10675952 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-023-01151-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prehospital tracheal intubation (TI) is associated with increased mortality in patients with penetrating trauma, and the utility of prehospital advanced airway management is debated. The increased incidence of deadly violence in Sweden warrants a comprehensive evaluation of current airway management for patients with penetrating trauma in the Swedish prehospital environment and on arrival in the emergency department (ED). METHODS This was an observational, multicenter study of all patients with penetrating trauma and injury severity scores (ISSs) ≥ 15 included in the Swedish national trauma register (SweTrau) between 2011 and 2019. We investigated the frequency and characteristics of prehospital and ED TI, including 30-day mortality and patient characteristics associated with TI. RESULT Of 816 included patients, 118 (14.5%) were intubated prehospitally, and 248 (30.4%) were intubated in the ED. Patients who were intubated prehospitally had a higher ISS, 33 (interquartile range [IQR] 25, 75), than those intubated in the ED, 25 (IQR 18, 34). Prehospital TI was associated with a higher associated mortality, OR 4.26 (CI 2.57, 7.27, p < 0.001) than TI in the ED, even when adjusted for ISS (OR 2.88 [CI 1.64, 5.14, p < 0.001]). Hemodynamic collapse (≤ 40 mmHg) and low GCS score (≤ 8) were the characteristics most associated with prehospital TI. Traumatic cardiac arrests (TCAs) occurred in 154 (18.9%) patients, of whom 77 (50%) were intubated prehospitally and 56 (36.4%) were intubated in the ED. A subgroup analysis excluding TCA showed that patients with prehospital TI did not have a higher mortality rate than those with ED TI, OR 2.07 (CI 0.93, 4.51, p = 0.068), with OR 1.39 (0.56, 3.26, p = 0.5) when adjusted for ISS. CONCLUSION Prehospital TI was associated with a higher mortality rate than those with ED TI, which was specifically related to TCA; intubation did not affect mortality in patients without cardiac arrest. Mortality was high when airway management was needed, regardless of cardiac arrest, thereby emphasizing the challenges posed when anesthesia is needed. Several interventions, including whole blood transfusions, the implementation of second-tier EMS units and measures to shorten scene times, have been initiated in Sweden to counteract these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattias Renberg
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, Sjukhusbacken, 10, S1 SE-118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Martin Dahlberg
- Department of Surgery, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mikael Gellerfors
- Department of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Rapid Response Car, Capio, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Swedish Air Ambulance (SLA), Mora, Sweden
| | - Elham Rostami
- Experimental Traumatology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Medical Sciences, Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Mattias Günther
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, Sjukhusbacken, 10, S1 SE-118 83, Stockholm, Sweden
- Experimental Traumatology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chio JCT, Piehl M, De Maio VJ, Simpson JT, Matzko C, Belding C, Broome JM, Duchesne J. A CIRCULATION-FIRST APPROACH FOR RESUSCITATION OF TRAUMA PATIENTS WITH HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK. Shock 2023; 59:1-4. [PMID: 36703273 DOI: 10.1097/shk.0000000000002028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT The original guidelines of cardiopulmonary resuscitation focused on the establishment of an airway and rescue breathing before restoration of circulation through cardiopulmonary resuscitation. As a result, the airway-breathing-circulation approach became the central guiding principle of resuscitation. Despite new guidelines by the American Heart Association for a circulation-first approach, Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines continue to advocate for the airway-breathing-circulation sequence. Although definitive airway management is often necessary for severely injured patients, endotracheal intubation (ETI) before resuscitation in patients with hemorrhagic shock may worsen hypotension and precipitate cardiac arrest. In severely injured patients, a paradigm shift should be considered, which prioritizes restoration of circulation before ETI and positive pressure ventilation while maintaining a focus on basic airway assessment and noninvasive airway interventions. For this patient population, the most reasonable current strategy may be to target a simultaneous resuscitation approach, with immediate efforts to control hemorrhage and provide basic airway interventions while prioritizing volume resuscitation with blood products and deferring ETI until adequate systemic perfusion has been attained. We believe that a circulation-first sequence will improve both survival and neurologic outcomes for a traumatically injured patient and will continue to advocate this approach, as additional clinical evidence is generated to inform how to best tailor circulation-first resuscitation for varied injury patterns and patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Valerie J De Maio
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - John T Simpson
- Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Chelsea Matzko
- Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Cameron Belding
- Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Jacob M Broome
- Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Juan Duchesne
- Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Davis DP, Bosson N, Guyette FX, Wolfe A, Bobrow BJ, Olvera D, Walker RG, Levy M. Optimizing Physiology During Prehospital Airway Management: An NAEMSP Position Statement and Resource Document. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2022; 26:72-79. [PMID: 35001819 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2021.1992056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Airway management is a critical component of resuscitation but also carries the potential to disrupt perfusion, oxygenation, and ventilation as a consequence of airway insertion efforts, the use of medications, and the conversion to positive-pressure ventilation. NAEMSP recommends:Airway management should be approached as an organized system of care, incorporating principles of teamwork and operational awareness.EMS clinicians should prevent or correct hypoxemia and hypotension prior to advanced airway insertion attempts.Continuous physiological monitoring must be used during airway management to guide the timing of, limit the duration of, and inform decision making during advanced airway insertion attempts.Initial and ongoing confirmation of advanced airway placement must be performed using waveform capnography. Airway devices must be secured using a reliable method.Perfusion, oxygenation, and ventilation should be optimized before, during, and after advanced airway insertion.To mitigate aspiration after advanced airway insertion, EMS clinicians should consider placing a patient in a semi-upright position.When appropriate, patients undergoing advanced airway placement should receive suitable pharmacologic anxiolysis, amnesia, and analgesia. In select cases, the use of neuromuscular blocking agents may be appropriate.
Collapse
|