Abou L, Rice LA. The differences in demographics, fear of falling, transfer quality and participation enfranchisement between manual and power wheelchair users with multiple sclerosis and spinal cord injury.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2024;
19:1003-1008. [PMID:
36301722 DOI:
10.1080/17483107.2022.2138998]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE
To examine the differences in demographics, fear of falling (FOF), transfer quality and participation enfranchisement between manual and power wheelchair users with multiple sclerosis (MS) and spinal cord injury (SCI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Secondary data analysis including 126 manual or power wheelchair users with MS and SCI (median age, 53.00 years, IQR = 24.00). Demographic information including age, gender, height, weight and disability duration was collected. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated for all participants. Participation enfranchisement was examined using both subscales (Importance and Control) of the enfranchisement scale of the Community Participation Indicator (CPI). FOF was assessed using the Spinal Cord Injury-Falls Concern Scale (SCI-FCS) and transfer quality was assessed using the Transfer Assessment Instrument (TAI) 3.0 and 4.0. Mann-Whitney's U-tests or independent samples t-tests and chi-square were used to analyse the differences between continuous variables and categorical variables, respectively.
RESULTS
Fifty-seven percent of participants were manual wheelchair users. There were significant differences in most demographic information except for weight and disability duration. Significant differences were also found for BMI (t = 1.06, p = 0.04), CPI-Importance (U = 1282.50, p < 0.01), CPI-Control (U = 1165.50, p < 0.01) and SCI-FCS (t = 4.08, p < 0.01). Manual wheelchair users outperformed power wheelchair users in all outcomes analysed except the TAI (p = 0.18).
CONCLUSIONS
Power wheelchairs users presented with a higher BMI, reported lower participation enfranchisement, and reported higher levels of FOF compared to manual wheelchair users. The findings may help clinicians to develop targeted rehabilitation goals specific for power and manual wheelchair users with MS and SCI.
Collapse