Differentiation between emerging non-steroidal and established steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: head-to-head comparisons of pharmacological and clinical characteristics

When to use spironolactone, eplerenone or finerenone in the spectrum of cardiorenal diseases

Kidney disease frequently coexists with cardiovascular (CV) diseases, and this dual presence significantly amplifies the risk of adverse clinical outcomes. Shared pathophysiological mechanisms and common CV risk factors contribute to the increased expression of mineralocorticoid receptors, which in turn can drive the progression of chronic CV-kidney disorders. The steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) spironolactone and eplerenone have demonstrated efficacy in improving patient outcomes in cases of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction or after a myocardial infarction, but have limited value in patients with chronic kidney disease. The non-steroidal MRA finerenone has now established itself as a foundational guideline-recommended therapy in patients with diabetic kidney disease. To date, these pharmacological agents have been developed in distinct patient populations. The consequences of their distinct pharmacological profiles necessitate further consideration. They have not undergone testing across the entire spectrum of cardiorenal scenarios, and the evidence base is currently being complemented with ongoing trials. In this review, we aim to synthesize the existing body of evidence and chart the future trajectory for the use of spironolactone, eplerenone and finerenone in improving clinical outcomes across the diverse spectrum of cardiorenal diseases. By consolidating the current state of knowledge, we seek to provide valuable insights for informed decision making in the management of patients with these complex and interconnected conditions.

Intellectual landscapes and emerging trends of non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: a bibliometric and visual analysis

PURPOSE

With increasing studies, non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists have been increasingly recognized as a major novel dimension in cardiorenal disease therapy. This bibliometric analysis aimed to uncover current research status and identify future research directions in the study of non-steroidal MR antagonists to inform subsequent investigations.

METHODS

Relevant English-language literature was retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded of the Web of Science Core Collection on January 10, 2024. Analyses of countries, institutions, authors, journals, documents, cited references and keywords were performed by the CiteSpace and VOSviewer software.

RESULTS

Overall, 498 documents, including 297 articles and 201 reviews, were included and analyzed. The United States (n = 188), Bayer AG (n = 78), and Professor Peter Kolkhof (n = 59) were the most prolific country, institution, and author in this field, respectively. Cluster analysis of cited references identified major clusters like cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and omecamtiv mecarbil. Keyword analysis indicated that sodium-glucose transport protein (SGLT)-2 inhibitors, pharmacotherapy, clinical trial, and guideline have emerged recently.

CONCLUSION

The field of non-steroidal MR antagonists is gradually gaining momentum as a novel pharmacotherapy in cardiorenal diseases, especially diabetic kidney disease, hypertension, and heart failure. Future studies will focus on add-on pharmacotherapy by combining non-steroidal MR antagonists with SGLT-2 inhibitors and the development and publication of clinical guidelines to facilitate patient management.

Comparison of different medical treatments for primary hyperaldosteronism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

The effectiveness and side effects between different medical treatments in patients with primary hyperaldosteronism have not been systematically studied.

Objective

To analyze the efficacy between different mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) and epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) inhibitors in a network meta-analysis (NMA) framework, while also evaluating adverse events.

Design

Systematic review and NMA.

Data sources and methods

The systematic review and NMA was reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, and Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adult patients with primary hyperaldosteronism until 23 June 2023. Studies that compared the efficacy and side effects of different medical treatments of primary hyperaldosteronism were included. The primary outcomes included the effect on blood pressure, serum potassium, and major adverse cardiovascular events. The secondary outcomes were adverse events related to MRAs (hyperkalemia and gynecomastia). Frequentist NMA and pairwise meta-analysis were conducted.

Results

A total of 5 RCTs comprising 392 participants were included. Eplerenone, esaxerenone, and amiloride were compared to spironolactone and demonstrated comparable effect on the reduction of systolic blood pressure. In comparison to spironolactone, eplerenone exhibited a less pronounced effect on reducing diastolic blood pressure [-4.63 mmHg; 95% confidence interval (CI): -8.87 to -0.40 mmHg] and correcting serum potassium (-0.2 mg/dL; 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.03 mg/dL). Spironolactone presented a higher risk of gynecomastia compared with eplerenone (relative risk: 4.69; 95% CI: 3.58-6.14).

Conclusion

The present NMA indicated that the blood pressure reduction and potassium-correcting effects of the three MRAs may demonstrate marginal differences, with confidence levels in the evidence being very low. Therefore, further research is needed to explore the efficacy of these MRAs, especially regarding their impact on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes.

Trial registration

PROSPERO (CRD: 42023446811).

Gene expression analysis to identify mechanisms underlying improvement of myocardial fibrosis by finerenone in SHR

Both spironolactone and finerenone treatments significantly reduced SBP and there was no statistical difference in their antihypertensive effects. The differences in body weight (at the end of 1/2/3/4 week) to pre-dose body weight ratio and heart rate (at the end of 1/2/3/4 week) to pre-dose heart rate ratio were not statistically significant in the vehicle, spironolactone, finerenone, and control groups.There was no statistically significant difference in mortality among the vehicle, spironolactone, and finerenone groups. The relative heart mass, ANP, BNP, CVF, Col I, TGF-β, and Casp-3 were gradually decreased in vehicle group, spironolactone group, and finerenone group. Among them, BNP, CVF, TGF-β, and Casp-3 were significantly decreased in the finerenone group compared with the vehicle group. HE and Masson staining showed that the cardiomyocytes of rats in the vehicle group and spironolactone group were disorganized, with cell hypertrophy, significantly enlarged cell gaps and a large amount of collagen deposition, whereas the cardiomyocytes of rats in the finerenone group and the control group were more neatly arranged, with smaller cell gaps and a small amount of collagen tissue deposition. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) showed that there was a total of 119 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between finerenone treatment and vehicle treatment. Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis showed that the signaling pathways involved were mainly in drug metabolism-cytochrome P450, chemical carcinogenesis, IL-17 signaling pathway, axon guidance, and hematopoietic cell lineage. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis showed that the core genes were Oaslf, Nos2, LOC687780, Rhobtb1, Ephb3, and Rps27a.

Non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a major health challenge associated with a disproportionately high burden of end-stage renal disease, cardiovascular disease and death. This review summarizes the rationale, clinical evidence and practical implementation for non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (nsMRAs), a drug class now approved and recommended for patients with T2D and CKD at risk of cardiorenal disease progression. Three nsMRAs (finerenone, esaxerenone and apararenone) have been evaluated but finerenone is currently the only approved nsMRA for this indication. Two large-scale, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 studies evaluated finerenone added to a maximally tolerated dose of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin II receptor blocker. Over >2 years of treatment, finerenone was associated with a significant reduction in composite endpoints of renal and cardiovascular outcomes versus placebo. Esaxerenone or apararenone have both shown significant improvements in albuminuria versus placebo. In general, nsMRAs were well tolerated. Hyperkalaemia was the most notable treatment-related adverse event and could generally be managed through serum potassium monitoring and dose adjustments. The nsMRAs are now an important component of recommended treatment for CKD associated with T2D, providing a significant reduction in the risk of cardiorenal progression beyond what can be achieved with glucose and blood pressure control.

Chronic Kidney Disease in the Older Adult Patient with Diabetes

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are common in middle aged and older adult individuals. DM may accelerate the aging process, and the age-related declines in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) can pose a challenge to diagnosing diabetic kidney disease (DKD) using standard diagnostic criteria especially with the absence of severe albuminuria among older adults. In the presence of CKD and DM, older adult patients may need multidisciplinary care due to susceptibility to various health issues, e.g., cognitive decline, auditory or visual impairment, various comorbidities, complex medical regimens, and increased sensitivity to medication adverse effects. As a result, it can be challenging to apply recent therapeutic advancements for the general population to older adults. We review the evidence that the benefits from these newer therapies apply equally to older and younger patients with CKD and diabetes type 2 and propose a comprehensive management. This framework will address nonpharmacological measures and pharmacological management with renin angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), non-steroidal mineralocorticoids receptor antagonists (MRAs), and glucagon like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs).

Controversies in Hypertension V: Resistant and Refractory Hypertension

Apparent resistant hypertension, defined as uncontrolled office blood pressure despite ≥ 3 antihypertensive medications including a diuretic or use of ≥ 4 medications regardless of blood pressure, occurs in ≤ 15% of treated hypertensives. Apparent refractory hypertension, defined as uncontrolled office pressure despite use of 5 or more medications including a diuretic, occurs in ≤ 10% of resistant cases. Both are associated with increased comorbidity and enhanced cardiovascular risk. To rule out pseudo-resistant or pseudo-refractory hypertension, employ guideline-based methodology for obtaining pressure, maximize the regimen, rule out white-coat effect, and assess adherence. True resistant hypertension is characterized by volume overload and aldosterone excess, refractory by enhanced sympathetic tone. Spironolactone is the preferred agent for resistance, with lower doses. Spironolactone, potassium binders, or both, are preferred if the estimated glomerular filtration rate is below 45. If significant albuminuria, finerenone is indicated. The optimal treatment of refractory hypertension is unclear, but sympathetic inhibition (α-β blockade, centrally acting sympathoinhibitors, or both) seems reasonable. Renal denervation has shown minimal benefit for resistance, but its role in refractory hypertension remains to be defined.

Efficacy and safety assessment of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

The objective of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) and determine the optimal MRA treatment regimen in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to June 20, 2022. The composite kidney outcome, cardiovascular events, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR), estimated glomerular filtration rate (EGFR), serum potassium, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), creatine and creatine clearance were included for analysis. We conducted pairwise meta-analyses and Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMA) and calculated the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

RESULTS

We included 26 studies with 15,531 participants. By pairwise meta-analyses, we found that MRA treatment could significantly reduce UACR in CKD patients with or without diabetes. Notably, compared to placebo, Finerenone was associated with a lower risk of composite kidney outcome and cardiovascular events. Data from NMA demonstrated an overt UACR reduction without increasing serum potassium by Apararenone, Esaxerenone, and Finerenone in CKD patients. Spironolactone decreased SBP and DBP but elevated CKD patients' serum potassium.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to placebo, Apararenone, Esaxerenone, and Finerenone might ameliorate albuminuria in CKD patients without causing elevated serum potassium levels. Remarkably, Finerenone conferred a cardiovascular benefit, and Spironolactone lowered blood pressure in CKD patients.

Finerenone: Questions and Answers-The Four Fundamental Arguments on the New-Born Promising Non-Steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the most common complications of diabetes mellitus and an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Despite guideline-directed therapy of CKD in patients with type 2 diabetes, the risk of renal failure and cardiovascular events still remains high, and diabetes remains the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease in affected patients. To date, current medications for CKD and type 2 diabetes mellitus have not reset residual risk in patients due to a high grade of inflammation and fibrosis contributing to kidney and heart disease. This question-and-answer-based review will discuss the pharmacological and clinical differences between finerenone and other mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and then move on to the main evidence in the cardiovascular and renal fields, closing, finally, on the potential role of therapeutic combination with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is).

Potential Impact of Non-Steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Cardiovascular Disease

Inappropriate mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation in different cardiovascular cell types has deleterious effects on cardiac remodeling and function. Therefore, MR inhibition is a crucial pharmacological strategy to overcome cardiovascular dysfunction. Despite efficient blockade of MR with steroidal MR antagonists (MRAs), their clinical application is unsatisfactory due to the adverse effects. Newer non-steroidal MRAs with greater potency could be suitable for clinical application, especially in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Although clinical evidence has shown the beneficial effects of non-steroidal MRAs on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Therefore, comparative pharmacological characterization of non-steroidal MRAs over classic steroidal MRAs is crucial. Here, we summarize the pre-clinical evidence of non-steroidal MRAs, which suggests an improvement in cardiac dysfunction, as well as the underlying molecular mechanisms in animal models mimicking different clinical conditions. In addition, we discuss up-to-date information from clinical trials regarding the beneficial effects of non-steroidal MRAs on meaningful cardiovascular outcomes. Both pre-clinical and clinical evidence support treatment with non-steroidal MRAs in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Structure-function relationships of the aldosterone receptor

The cellular response to the adrenal steroid aldosterone is mediated by the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors. The MR binds more than one physiological ligand with binding at the MR determined by pre-receptor metabolism of glucocorticoid ligands by 11β hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2. The MR has a wide tissue distribution with multiple roles beyond the classical role in electrolyte homeostasis including cardiovascular function, immune cell signaling, neuronal fate and adipocyte differentiation. The MR has three principal functional domains, an N-terminal ligand domain, a central DNA binding domain and a C-terminal, ligand binding domain, with structures having been determined for the latter two domains but not for the whole receptor. MR signal-transduction can be best viewed as a series of interactions which are determined by the conformation conferred on the receptor by ligand binding. This conformation then determines subsequent intra- and inter-molecular interactions. These interactions include chromatin, coregulators and other transcription factors, and additional less well characterized cytoplasmic non-genomic effects via crosstalk with other signaling pathways. This chapter will provide a review of MR structure and function, and an analysis of the critical interactions involved in MR-mediated signal transduction, which contribute to ligand- and tissue-specificity. Understanding the relevant mechanisms for selective MR signaling in terms of these interactions opens the possibility of novel therapeutic approaches for the treatment of MR-mediated diseases.

Efficacy and safety of non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for renal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Novel nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are noted for their potential cardiorenal benefits for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney diseases; however, the effect of this regimen on renal outcomes remains uncertain.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of nonsteroidal MRAs focusing primarily on renal outcomes and safety in randomized, controlled trials. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systemically searched for trials published through April 2022. We included randomized, controlled trials assessing the effects of nonsteroidal MRAs on renal outcomes, as well as cardiovascular disease (CVD) effects in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Summary estimates of risk ratios (RRs) reductions were calculated with a random-effects model. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. This study is registered with PROSPERO under number CRD42022335464.

FINDINGS

In total, 11 trials and 1 pooled analysis including a total of 17,517 participants were enrolled. Nonsteroidal MRAs reduced renal composite endpoints by 17 % [HR = 0.83, 95 % (0.75, 0.91); low quality] with 16 % in kidney failure (high quality), 23 % in ESRD (high quality), 20 % in eGFR decreased to less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m² (high quality), and 17 % with more than a 40 % decrease in eGFR (high quality); 14 % with cardiovascular composite endpoints [HR = 0.86, 95 % (0.78, 0.94); moderate quality]; and 13 % of all-cause mortality [HR = 0.87, 95 % (0.76, 0.98); moderate quality]. Nonsteroidal MRAs were also associated with additional benefits in lowering UACR levels (moderate quality) and lowering BP levels (moderate quality) compared with the control groups. However, nonsteroidal MRAs did not show a statistically significant effect on the risk of renal death (moderate quality), hospitalization for any cause (moderate quality) or change in GFR (low quality). Regarding safety, there was no significant difference in the risk of adverse events between the participants receiving nonsteroidal MRAs and the control group.

INTERPRETATION

Nonsteroidal MRAs had a statistically beneficial effect on reducing the risk of the composite kidney outcome, the composite of cardiovascular outcomes, and all-cause mortality. Nonsteroidal MRAs were also associated with benefits of proteinuria remission and blood pressure lowering. Although these findings provided positive evidence for the use of nonsteroidal MRAs for cardiorenal protection in patients with or without CKD, the quality of this evidence is potentially uncertain.

Cardiovascular-renal protective effect and molecular mechanism of finerenone in type 2 diabetic mellitus

Chronic kidney diseases (CKD) and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the main complications in type 2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM), increasing the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Current therapeutic strategies that delay the progression of CKD and the development of CVD include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA). In the progression of CKD and CVD, mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) overactivation leads to inflammation and fibrosis in the heart, kidney and vascular system, making mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) as a promising therapeutic option in T2DM with CKD and CVD. Finerenone is the third generation highly selective non-steroidal MRAs. It significantly reduces the risk of cardiovascular and renal complications. Finerenone also improves the cardiovascular-renal outcomes in T2DM patients with CKD and/or chronic heart failure (CHF). It is safer and more effective than the first- and second-generation MRAs due to its higher selectivity and specificity, resulting in a lower incidence of adverse effects including hyperkalemia, renal insufficiency and androgen-like effects. Finerenone shows potent effect on improving the outcomes of CHF, refractory hypertension, and diabetic nephropathy. Recently studies have shown that finerenone may have potential therapeutic effect on diabetic retinopathy, primary aldosteronism, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension and so on. In this review, we discuss the characteristics of finerenone, the new third-generation MRA, and compared with the first- and second-generation steroidal MRAs and other nonsteroidal MRAs. We also focus on its safety and efficacy of clinical application on CKD with T2DM patients. We hope to provide new insights for the clinical application and therapeutic prospect.

Real-world evidence for steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with chronic kidney disease

Background

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) were shown to delay chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression in patients with hypertension and/or heart failure (HF) and proteinuria.

Objective

We conducted a systematic literature review on real-world evidence to identify the literature gaps related to the efficacy and safety outcomes of MRAs administered to CKD patients.

Results

A total of 751 records were identified of which, 23 studies (26 publications) were analyzed. Studies included heterogeneous populations, including the overall CKD, CKD and diabetes, CKD and HF, and CKD and a history of cardiovascular disease. Most of the studies were small and non-rigorous, resulting in a notable lack of evidence in these populations. In the overall CKD population, steroidal MRAs resulted in a significant or sustained eGFR reduction but no efficacy in delaying progression to end-stage kidney disease. No cardiovascular protection was found. Results for all-cause mortality and hospitalization for HF were inconsistent; however, the longest follow-up studies indicate similar or lower incidence for spironolactone non-users. Most results consistently reported a higher incidence of hyperkalemia among patients on steroidal MRAs in all CKD stages, and side effects led to high discontinuation rates in the real-world setting.

Conclusions

Despite the limited availability of evidence on the effectiveness and safety of steroidal MRAs in CKD patients and subgroups with diabetes, HF or history of cardiovascular disease, MRAs were shown to have a limited effect on renal and cardiovascular outcomes. Gaps in the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of MRAs are particularly relevant in diabetic CKD patients; therefore, further research is warranted.

An overview of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists as a treatment option for patients with heart failure: the current state-of-the-art and future outlook

INTRODUCTION

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure. These benefits of MRAs vary in different heart failure populations based on left ventricular ejection fraction and associated comorbidities.

AREAS COVERED

We define the pharmacologic properties of MRAs and the pathophysiological rationale for their utility in heart failure. We outline the current literature on the use of MRAs in different heart failure populations, including reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF/ HFpEF), and acute heart failure decompensation. Finally, we describe the limitations of currently available data and propose future directions of study.

EXPERT OPINION

While there is strong evidence supporting the use of MRAs in HFrEF, evidence in patients with HFpEF or acute heart failure is less definitive. Comorbidities such as obesity or atrial fibrillation could be clinical modifiers of the response to MRAs and potentially alter the risk/benefit ratio in these subpopulations. Emerging evidence for new non-steroidal MRAs reveal promising preliminary results that, if confirmed in large randomized clinical trials, could favor a change in clinical practice.

Novel antihypertensive agents for resistant hypertension: what does the future hold?

Finding complementary compelling novel therapeutic agents for better control of blood pressure in people with resistant hypertension is moving into unchartered territory. The latest therapeutic developments explore approaches in the clinical arena that were either not examined or could only be examined in animal models two decades ago. Four main mechanisms have now been explored and operationalized in drug development: (a) mineralocorticoid receptor blockade using a nonsteroidal structure with many fewer side effects, (b) an aminopeptidase A inhibitor that has central effects on vasopressin, (c) a combined endothelin A and B receptor blocker and (d) an aldosterone synthase inhibitor devoid of glucocorticoid activity. All these agents are either completing Phase II development and starting Phase III or are involved in the ongoing recruitment of Phase III trials. Additionally, novel agents use antisense inhibition to block angiotensinogen development in the liver. These agents are discussed only for completeness, as they are still in Phase II trial development. Last, another agent that was initially being developed as an antihypertensive and once the data were reviewed by the company clearly showed efficacy as a heart failure agent was sacubitril/valsartan, which was ultimately approved. However, there are some discussions about reinvigorating the quest for an indication for hypertension, although no such steps have been formally initiated.

Potassium management with finerenone: Practical aspects

INTRODUCTION

Finerenone, a selective nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, has favourable effects on cardiorenal outcomes in patients with mild-to-severe chronic kidney disease with increased albuminuria and type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Two large, randomized trials have evaluated the effects of finerenone on clinical outcomes. The first trial (FIDELIO-DKD) investigated renal outcomes, and the second (FIGARO-DKD) cardiovascular outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients in the two studies had a high intrinsic risk of hyperkalemia due to type 2 diabetes, treatment with optimized doses of an inhibitor of the renin-angiotensin system, and, in some patients, their advanced chronic kidney disease. This was reflected in the incidence of hyperkalemia in the placebo group during the trials. Patients on finerenone had a significantly higher incidence of hyperkalemia compared with patients on placebo, but treatment discontinuation due to hyperkalemia was low, and no patients experienced death attributable to hyperkalemia. Structured routine potassium monitoring with temporary treatment interruption and dose reduction, as used in the two trials, should ensure the safe use of finerenone to protect the kidneys and cardiovascular system of patients with albuminuric chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

The aim of this document is to highlight the routine potassium management required when using finerenone and to provide practical recommendations.

Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism by Finerenone—Translational Aspects and Clinical Perspectives across Multiple Organ Systems

Perception of the role of the aldosterone/mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) ensemble has been extended from a previously renal epithelial-centered focus on sodium and volume homeostasis to an understanding of their role as systemic modulators of reactive oxygen species, inflammation, and fibrosis. Steroidal MR antagonists (MRAs) are included in treatment paradigms for resistant hypertension and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, while more recently, the nonsteroidal MRA finerenone was shown to reduce renal and cardiovascular outcomes in two large phase III trials (FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD) in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes, respectively. Here, we provide an overview of the pathophysiologic role of MR overactivation and preclinical evidence with the nonsteroidal MRA finerenone in a range of different disease models with respect to major components of the aggregate mode of action, including interfering with reactive oxygen species generation, inflammation, fibrosis, and hypertrophy. We describe a time-dependent effect of these mechanistic components and the potential modification of major clinical parameters, as well as the impact on clinical renal and cardiovascular outcomes as observed in FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD. Finally, we provide an outlook on potential future clinical indications and ongoing clinical studies with finerenone, including a combination study with a sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Activation in Vascular Insulin Resistance and Dysfunction

Systemic insulin resistance is characterized by reduced insulin metabolic signaling and glucose intolerance. Mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs), the principal receptors for the hormone aldosterone, play an important role in regulating renal sodium handling and blood pressure. Recent studies suggest that MRs also exist in tissues outside the kidney, including vascular endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, perivascular adipose tissue, and immune cells. Risk factors, including excessive salt intake/salt sensitivity, hypertension, and obesity, can lead to the activation of vascular MRs to promote inflammation, oxidative stress, remodeling, and fibrosis, as well as cardiovascular stiffening and microcirculatory impairment. These pathophysiological changes are associated with a diminished ability of insulin to initiate appropriate intracellular signaling events, resulting in a reduced glucose uptake within the microcirculation and related vascular insulin resistance. Therefore, the pharmacological inhibition of MR activation provides a potential therapeutic option for improving vascular function, glucose uptake, and vascular insulin sensitivity. This review highlights recent experimental and clinical data that support the contribution of abnormal MR activation to the development of vascular insulin resistance and dysfunction.

Management of hypertension in advanced kidney disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to present recent developments in pharmacotherapy of hypertension in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD).

RECENT FINDINGS

In the AMBER trial, compared with placebo, the potassium-binder patiromer mitigated the risk of hyperkalaemia and enabled more patients with uncontrolled resistant hypertension and stage 3b/4 CKD to tolerate and continue spironolactone treatment; add-on therapy with spironolactone provoked a clinically meaningful reduction of 11-12 mmHg in unattended automated office SBP over 12 weeks of follow-up. In the BLOCK-CKD trial, the investigational nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid-receptor-antagonist (MRA) KBP-5074 lowered office SBP by 7-10 mmHg relative to placebo at 84 days with a minimal risk of hyperkalaemia in patients with advanced CKD and uncontrolled hypertension. The CLICK trial showed that the thiazide-like diuretic chlorthalidone provoked a placebo-subtracted reduction of 10.5 mmHg in 24-h ambulatory SBP at 12 weeks in patients with stage 4 CKD and poorly controlled hypertension.

SUMMARY

Enablement of more persistent spironolactone use with newer potassium-binding agents, the clinical development of novel nonsteroidal MRAs with a more favourable benefit-risk profile and the recently proven blood pressure lowering action of chlorthalidone are three therapeutic opportunities for more effective management of hypertension in high-risk patients with advanced CKD.

The non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone is a novel therapeutic option for patients with Type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease

Despite strong preclinical data supporting the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) to provide cardiorenal protection in rodent models of diabetes, the clinical evidence of their utility in treating chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been limited. Two major clinical trials (FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD) including more than 13,000 patients with albuminuric CKD and Type 2 diabetes randomized to placebo or finerenone (MRA) have recently provided exciting results showing a significant risk reduction for kidney and cardiovascular outcomes. In this review, we will summarize the major findings of these trials, together with post-hoc and pooled analyses that have allowed evaluation of the efficacy and safety of finerenone across the spectrum of CKD, revealing significant protective effects of finerenone against kidney failure, new-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter, new-onset heart failure, cardiovascular death, and first and total heart-failure hospitalizations. Moreover, we will discuss the current evidence that supports the combined use of MRAs with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, either by providing an additive cardiorenal benefit or by decreasing the risk of hyperkalemia. Although the mechanisms of protection by finerenone have only been partially explored in patients, rodent studies have shed light on its anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects in models of kidney disease, which is one of the main drivers for testing the efficacy of finerenone in non-diabetic CKD patients in the ongoing FIND-CKD trial.

Discovery of Apararenone (MT-3995) as a Highly Selective, Potent, and Novel Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist

Overactivation of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) is involved in many diseases, such as hypertension, kidney disease, and heart failure. Thus, MR antagonists (MRAs) are expected to be beneficial to patients with these diseases. In order to identify novel nonsteroidal MRAs that overcome the issues of already marketed steroidal MRAs, we searched for new compounds guided by our hypothesis that T-shaped compounds with a hydrophobic core structure, two polar functional groups at both extremities able to interact with MR, and a bulky substituent that can interfere with the folding of the C-terminal helix 12 may exhibit antagonist activity toward MR. We discovered that the novel 1,4-benzoxazin-3-one derivative 19 (apararenone: MT-3995) acted as a highly selective and potent nonsteroidal MRA. Apararenone exhibited a more potent antihypertensive and organ-protective activity than steroidal MRA eplerenone in a primary aldosteronism rat model obtained by infusing aldosterone in uninephrectomized rats.

Cerebro-Cardiovascular Risk, Target Organ Damage, and Treatment Outcomes in Primary Aldosteronism

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common type of endocrine hypertension, and numerous experimental and clinical evidence have verified that prolonged exposure to excess aldosterone is responsible for an increased risk of cerebro-cardiovascular events and target organ damage (TOD) in patients with PA. Therefore, focusing on restoring the toxic effects of excess aldosterone on the target organs is very important to reduce cerebro-cardiovascular events. Current evidence convincingly demonstrates that both surgical and medical treatment strategies would benefit cerebro-cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in the long term. Understanding cerebro-cardiovascular risk in PA would help clinical doctors to achieve both early diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, in this review, we will summarize the cerebro-cardiovascular risk in PA, focusing on the TOD of aldosterone, including brain, heart, vascular system, renal, adipose tissues, diabetes, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Furthermore, the various treatment outcomes of adrenalectomy and medical treatment for patients with PA will also be discussed. We hope this knowledge will help improve cerebro-cardiovascular prognosis and reduce the incidence and mortality of cerebro-cardiovascular events in patients with PA.