Assessment of nicotine uptake from cigarette smoke: comparison of a colorimetric test strip (NicCheck I™) and gas chromatography/mass selective detector

Dipstick tests for secondhand smoke exposure

INTRODUCTION

We tested TobacAlert and NicAlert immunochromatographic strips for use as indicators of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure.

METHODS

Urine samples collected from SHS-unexposed volunteers were spiked with cotinine to concentrations of 5, 8, 13, and 23 ng cotinine/ml urine. One sample was not spiked and used as a control. According to manufacturer's instructions, 45 NicAlert and 45 TobacAlert dipsticks were prepared. The exercise was repeated once. Cotinine levels in urine samples were measured using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS). STATA was used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Ninety NicAlert and 90 TobacAlert dipsticks were tested. Each strip was read by 3 different readers, for 270 NicAlert and 270 TobacAlert readings; 98/270 (36%) NicAlert and 104/270 (39%) TobacAlert readings agreed with the readings predicted by LC/MS-determined cotinine levels. Spearman's rho for the NicAlert strips was .13 and for the TobacAlert strips .23. Both were statistically significant. Using a dichotomous scheme to interpret any strip reading >or=1 as "positive," indicating SHS exposure, NicAlert strips were 94% sensitive and 31% specific, while TobacAlert strips were 89% sensitive and 60% specific.

DISCUSSION

NicAlert and TobacAlert strips performed poorly at low cotinine levels. While the strips could be used to prescreen samples prior to more accurate testing, their use in the clinical or research setting to indicate SHS exposure should be restricted to carefully selected scenarios.

Validity of Expired Carbon Monoxide and Urine Cotinine Using Dipstick Method to Assess Smoking Status

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the validity of the dipstick method (Mossman Associates Inc. USA) and the expired CO method to distinguish between smokers and nonsmokers. We also elucidated the related factors of the two methods.

METHODS

This study included 244 smokers and 50 ex-smokers, recruited from smoking cessation clinics at 4 local public health centers, who had quit for over 4 weeks. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity and Kappa coefficient of each method for validity. We obtained ROC curve, predictive value and agreement to determine the cutoff of expired air CO method. Finally, we elucidated the related factors and compared their effect powers using the standardized regression coefficient.

RESULTS

The dipstick method showed a sensitivity of 92.6%, specificity of 96.0% and Kappa coefficient of 0.79. The best cutoff value to distinguish smokers was 5-6 ppm. At 5 ppm, the expired CO method showed a sensitivity of 94.3%, specificity of 82.0% and Kappa coefficient of 0.73. And at 6 ppm, sensitivity, specificity and Kappa coefficient were 88.5%, 86.0% and 0.64, respectively. Therefore, the dipstick method had higher sensitivity and specificity than the expired CO method. The dipstick and expired CO methods were significantly increased with increasing smoking amount. With longer time since the last smoking, expired CO showed a rapid decrease after 4 hours, whereas the dipstick method showed relatively stable levels for more than 4 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

The dipstick and expired CO methods were both good indicators for assessing smoking status. However, the former showed higher sensitivity and specificity and stable levels over longer hours after smoking, compared to the expired CO method.

Contingency management for smoking cessation in adolescent smokers

This pilot study evaluated the use of contingency management (CM) procedures in combination with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for smoking cessation in adolescents. Twenty-eight treatment-seeking adolescent smokers participated in a 1-month, school-based smoking cessation program and were randomly assigned to receive either CM with weekly CBT or CBT alone. In the CM+CBT group, biochemical verification of abstinence was obtained twice daily during the first 2 weeks, followed by daily appointments during the 3rd week and once every other day during the 4th week. Participants were monetarily reinforced for abstinence on an escalating magnitude schedule with a reset contingency. At the end of 1 week and 1 month of treatment, abstinence verified using quantitative urine cotinine levels was higher in participants in the CM+CBT group (1 week: 76.7%; 1 month: 53.0%) when compared with the CBT-alone group (1 week: 7.2%; 4 weeks: 0%). These preliminary results provide a strong initial signal supporting the utility of CM techniques for smoking cessation in adolescents and demonstrate the feasibility of implementing such a program in a school setting.