Parental views of antenatal testing and termination following a diagnosis of cleft lip

Can a Predetermined Grid and Multidisciplinary Consultation Improve the Description of Cleft lip with or Without Cleft Palate?

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound (US) grid and multidisciplinary consultation (maxillofacial surgeon-sonographer) during prenatal US imaging to improve the sensitivity of prenatal description for cleft lip (CL) with or without alveolar cleft (CLA) or +/- cleft palate (CLP).

DESIGN

Retrospective study of children with CL/P in a tertiary children's Hospital.

SETTING

Single-center cohort study conducted in a tertiary pediatric Hospital.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-nine cases of prenatally diagnosed CL +/-CA or CP between January 2009 and December 2017 were analyzed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The correlation was analyzed between prenatal US and postnatal data with regard to eight 2D US criteria (upper lip, alveolar ridge, median maxillary bud, homolateral nostril subsidence, deviated nasal septum, hard palate, tongue movement, nasal cushion flux) in order to propose them in a grid, as well as the presence of the maxillofacial surgeon during the US examination.

RESULTS

Among the 38 cases included, the results were considered satisfied for 87%. Sixty five percent of the US criteria were described when the final diagnosis was correct (5.2 criteria) versus (vs) 45% (3.6 criteria); [OR = 2.28; IC95% (1.10-4.75) P = .022 < 0.05]. This study also highlighted a more in-depth description when the maxillofacial surgeon was present with 68% of 2D US criteria fulfilled (5.4 criteria) vs 47.5% (3.8) when the sonographer was alone [OR = 2.32; IC95% (1.34-4.06) P < .001].

CONCLUSION

This US grid with eight criteria has considerably contributed to a more precise prenatal description. In addition, the systematic multidisciplinary consultation seemed to optimize it and lead to better prenatal information on pathology and postnatal surgical techniques.

Decrease in Prevalence of Cleft lip, Alveolus and Palate After Nationwide Introduction of the Second-Trimester Anomaly Scan in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVE

Some studies have suggested that introducing a second-trimester anomaly scan (SAS) leads to increased rates of termination of pregnancy (TOP) in fetuses with orofacial clefts (OFCs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a nationwide introduction of SAS on the prevalence of live births with OFCs in the Netherlands.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary setting.

POPULATION

Included in the study were all patients diagnosed with OFCs as recorded in the "Dutch Association for Cleft Palate Anomalies" database between 1997 and 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were divided into three categories: cleft lip with or without alveolus (CL/A), cleft lip, alveolus and palate (CLAP) and cleft palate (CP) based on anatomical landmarks at the first consultation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence rates of OFCs before and after the nationwide introduction of the SAS on January 1, 2007 were compared.

RESULT

Overall, 1899 patients were diagnosed with CL/A, 2586 with CLAP and 2927 with CP. The prevalence of clefts before and after introduction of the SAS did not differ (P = 0.85). The prevalence of CL/A decreased (P = 0.04), and that of CLAP decreased (P = 0.01) and that of CP increased (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a significant decrease in the prevalence of CL/A and CLAP after introduction of the SAS. However, due to an increase in CP, the prevalence of all patients born with OFCs has not changed in the Netherlands between 1997 and 2019.

Provision of Care for Families Affected by Craniofacial Conditions: The Views of Nonspecialist Health Professionals

OBJECTIVE

A diagnosis of a congenital craniofacial condition can have a significant impact on the psychological well-being of the affected family. As the first health professionals likely to come into contact with families, nonspecialists, such as diagnostic sonographers, midwives, and health visitors play a crucial role in facilitating familial adjustment. Yet, previous research has demonstrated parental dissatisfaction with the care delivered by nonspecialists. The aim of this study was to investigate the provision of care for families affected by craniofacial conditions from the perspective of nonspecialist health professionals, with a view to informing the development of educational materials.

DESIGN

Individual semistructured telephone interviews (n = 14) were conducted with 3 diagnostic sonographers, 2 fetal medicine consultants, 3 midwives, 4 health visitors, and 2 children's nurses.

RESULTS

Participants identified a range of barriers to the delivery of optimal care, including dealing with parental reactions, time pressure, hospital protocols and resources, a lack of contact with specialist craniofacial teams, and the emotional impact of delivering a diagnosis. Most participants had received no prior training in the area of congenital craniofacial conditions, while those who had felt current training materials were insufficient. All participants expressed a desire for further training and provided guidance regarding preferred content and format.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insight into the challenges faced by nonspecialists, as well as a range of information and training needs that could improve their knowledge and confidence. Suggestions for the development of educational materials for nonspecialist health professionals are made.