Autoantibodies in alcoholic liver disease

How Hepatologists Use Liver Biopsy in the Evaluation of Liver Disease?

This article focuses on how hepatologists view the role of liver biopsy in diagnosis, assessment, and management of chronic and acute liver disease, and its variable use among different etiologies of liver disease and in the evaluation of liver fibrosis.

Alcoholic liver disease and autoimmune hepatitis: Sometimes a closer look under the surface is needed

AIMS

Differential diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) incorporates various liver diseases, including alcoholic liver disease (ALD). We report on clinical, laboratory and outcome characteristics of AIH patients who were initially referred as ALD based on increased alcohol consumption (AIH/ALD).

METHODS

From 2000-2019, we retrospectively identified 12 AIH/ALD patients [9 males, age: 61 (30-73) years] in our prospective data base of 317 AIH patients.

RESULTS

AIH diagnosis was based on aminotransferases elevation in 10 patients, high IgG in 8, compatible autoantibody profile in all and typical/compatible histology in all 9 with available biopsy. There were no significant differences of baseline demographics, presentation, cirrhosis at diagnosis, response to treatment and simplified score compared to 45 age- and sex-matched AIH patients without alcohol consumption and 44 age- and sex-matched ALD patients. However, the AIH/ALD cohort was characterized by more frequent progression to cirrhosis, higher liver-related deaths and overall mortality compared to AIH, though similar to the ALD group. AST/ALT ratio>1 seems to bear a good positive (0.84) and negative predictive value (0.88) for ALD and AIH diagnosis, respectively, but cannot help in discriminating the AIH/ALD variant.

CONCLUSIONS

AIH should not be forgotten in patients with alcohol use when clinical and laboratory features hint towards the diagnosis of AIH/ALD variant as this group seems to have worse outcome compared to those with AIH alone suggesting the need for closer follow-up and surveillance. Reliable autoantibody testing and cautious interpretation of liver histology appear mandatory for AIH diagnosis in these difficult to diagnose cases.

Hepatic Immune System: Adaptations to Alcohol

Both the innate and adaptive immune systems are critical for the maintenance of healthy liver function. Immune activity maintains the tolerogenic capacity of the liver, modulates hepatocellular response to various stresses, and orchestrates appropriate cellular repair and turnover. However, in response to heavy, chronic alcohol exposure, the finely tuned balance of pro- and anti-inflammatory functions in the liver is disrupted, leading to a state of chronic inflammation in the liver. Over time, this non-resolving inflammatory response contributes to the progression of alcoholic liver disease (ALD). Here we review the contributions of the cellular components of the immune system to the progression of ALD, as well as the pathophysiological roles for soluble and circulating mediators of immunity, including cytokines, chemokines, complement, and extracellular vesicles, in ALD. Finally, we compare the role of the innate immune response in health and disease in the liver to our growing understanding of the role of neuroimmunity in the development and maintenance of a healthy central nervous system, as well as the progression of neuroinflammation.

Alcoholic Cirrhosis Increases Risk for Autoimmune Diseases: A Nationwide Registry-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Alcoholic cirrhosis is associated with hyperactivation and dysregulation of the immune system. In addition to its ability to increase risk for infections, it also may increase the risk for autoimmune diseases. We studied the incidence of autoimmune diseases among patients with alcoholic cirrhosis vs controls in Denmark.

METHODS

We collected data from nationwide health care registries to identify and follow up all citizens of Denmark diagnosed with alcoholic cirrhosis from 1977 through 2010. Each patient was matched with 5 random individuals from the population (controls) of the same sex and age. The incidence rates of various autoimmune diseases were compared between patients with cirrhosis and controls and adjusted for the number of hospitalizations in the previous year (a marker for the frequency of clinical examination).

RESULTS

Of the 24,679 patients diagnosed with alcoholic cirrhosis, 532 developed an autoimmune disease, yielding an overall increased adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) of 1.36 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.50). The strongest associations were with Addison's disease (aIRR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.04-5.85), inflammatory bowel disease (aIRR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.26-1.92), celiac disease (aIRR, 5.12; 95% CI, 2.58-10.16), pernicious anemia (aIRR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.50-3.68), and psoriasis (aIRR, 4.06; 95% CI, 3.32-4.97). There was no increase in the incidence rate for rheumatoid arthritis (aIRR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.69-1.15); the incidence rate for polymyalgia rheumatica decreased in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis compared with controls (aIRR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33-0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a nationwide cohort study of patients in Denmark, alcoholic cirrhosis is a risk factor for several autoimmune diseases.

CYP2E1 autoantibodies in liver diseases

Autoimmune reactions involving cytochrome P4502E1 (CYP2E1) are a feature of idiosyncratic liver injury induced by halogenated hydrocarbons and isoniazid, but are also detectable in about one third of the patients with advanced alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and chronic hepatitis C (CHC). In these latter the presence of anti-CYP2E1 auto-antibodies is an independent predictor of extensive necro-inflammation and fibrosis and worsens the recurrence of hepatitis following liver transplantation, indicating that CYP2E1-directed autoimmunity can contribute to hepatic injury. The molecular characterization of the antigens recognized by anti-CYP2E1 auto-antibodies in ALD and CHC has shown that the targeted conformational epitopes are located in close proximity on the molecular surface. Furthermore, these epitopes can be recognized on CYP2E1 expressed on hepatocyte plasma membranes where they can trigger antibody-mediated cytotoxicity. This does not exclude that T cell-mediated responses against CYP2E1 might also be involved in causing hepatocyte damage. CYP2E1 structural modifications by reactive metabolites and molecular mimicry represent important factors in the breaking of self-tolerance against CYP2E1 in, respectively, ALD and CHC. However, genetic or acquired interferences with the mechanisms controlling the homeostasis of the immune system are also likely to contribute. More studies are needed to better characterize the impact of anti-CYP2E1 autoimmunity in liver diseases particularly in relation to the fact that common metabolic alterations such as obesity and diabetes stimulates hepatic CYP2E1 expression.

•

CYP2E1 is a frequent autoimmune target in alcoholic liver disease and hepatitis C.

•

Anti-CYP2E1 auto-antibodies mainly target conformational epitopes.

•

Molecular mimicry contribute to anti-CYP2E1 autoimmunity during HCV infection.

•

Anti-CYP2E1 autoimmunity contributes to the evolution of liver damage.

Prevalence and significance of autoantibodies in patients with alcoholic liver disease

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and significance of serum autoantibodies in alcoholic liver disease (ALD) patients.

METHODS

In total, 90 male patients diagnosed with ALD or ALD overlapping with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) were included and their medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data and laboratory findings were collected. Anti-nuclear antibody (ANA), anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA) and anti-smooth muscle antibody (SMA) were detected by indirect immunofluorescent assay.

RESULTS

Autoantibodies were found in 69.6% (48/69) of patients with ALD and 66.7% (14/21) of those with ALD overlapping with CHB. The prevalence of total ANA in ALD patients was 63.8% (44/69). High titers of autoantibodies and multi-autoantibodies were found to be more often associated with cirrhosis than non-cirrhosis. There was a significant difference in the levels of globulin, white blood cell and platelet count (P < 0.05) between patients with positive and negative autoantibodies. However, the values of the other parameters were similar in the two groups. Patients with ALD more frequently had positive autoantibodies than those with CHB alone (69.6% vs. 37.5%, P < 0.01). And 10.4% of ALD patients with positive autoantibodies had systemic autoimmune or vascular diseases, which was not found in the CHB patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Autoantibodies are frequently present in patients with ALD and correlate to advanced liver disease. A high prevalence of autoantibodies in ALD may indicate that alcoholic-associated immune disturbance occurs during the development of the disease.

Lymphocyte subsets in alcoholic liver disease

AIM

To compare lymphocyte subsets between healthy controls and alcoholics with liver disease.

METHODS

The patient cohort for this study included individuals who were suspected to have alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and who had undergone liver biopsy (for disease grading and staging, doubts about diagnosis, or concurrent liver disease; n = 56). Normal controls included patients who were admitted for elective cholecystectomy due to non-complicated gallstones (n = 27). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded liver biopsy specimens were sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Perls' Prussian blue. The non-alcoholic steatohepatitis score was used to assess markers of ALD. Lymphocyte population subsets were determined by flow cytometry. T lymphocytes were identified (CD3(+)), and then further subdivided into CD4(+) or CD8(+) populations. B lymphocytes (CD19(+)) and natural killer (NK) cell numbers were also measured. In addition to assessing lymphocyte subpopulation differences between ALD patients and controls, we also compared subsets of alcoholic patients without cirrhosis or abstinent cirrhotic patients to normal controls.

RESULTS

The patient cohort primarily consisted of older men. Active alcoholism was present in 66.1%. Reported average daily alcohol intake was 164.9 g and the average lifetime cumulative intake was 2211.6 kg. Cirrhosis was present in 39.3% of the patients and 66.1% had significant fibrosis (perisinusoidal and portal/periportal fibrosis, bridging fibrosis, or cirrhosis) in their liver samples. The average Mayo end-stage liver disease score was 7.6. No hereditary hemochromatosis genotypes were found. ALD patients (n = 56) presented with significant lymphopenia (1.5 × 10(9)/L ± 0.5 × 10(9)/L vs 2.1 × 10(9)/L ± 0.5 × 10(9)/L, P < 0.0001), due to a decrease in all lymphocyte subpopulations, except for NK lymphocytes: CD3(+) (1013.0 ± 406.2/mm(3) vs 1523.0 ± 364.6/mm(3), P < 0.0001), CD4(+) (713.5 ± 284.7/mm(3) vs 992.4 ± 274.7/mm(3), P < 0.0001), CD8(+) (262.3 ± 140.4/mm(3) vs 478.9 ± 164.6/mm(3), P < 0.0001), and CD19(+) (120.6 ± 76.1/mm(3) vs 264.6 ± 88.0/mm(3), P < 0.0001). CD8(+) lymphocytes suffered the greatest reduction, as evidenced by an increase in the CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio (3.1 ± 1.3 vs 2.3 ± 0.9, P = 0.013). This ratio was associated with the stage of fibrosis on liver biopsy (r s = 0.342, P = 0.01) and with Child-Pugh score (r s = 0.482, P = 0.02). The number of CD8(+) lymphocytes also had a positive association with serum ferritin levels (r s = 0.345, P = 0.009). Considering only patients with active alcoholism but not cirrhosis (n = 27), we found similar reductions in total lymphocyte counts (1.8 × 10(9)/L ± 0.3 × 10(9)/L vs 2.1 × 10(9)/L ± 0.5 × 10(9)/L, P = 0.018), and in populations of CD3(+) (1164.7 ± 376.6/mm(3) vs 1523.0 ± 364.6/mm(3), P = 0.001), CD4(+) (759.8 ± 265.0/mm(3) vs 992.4 ± 274.7/mm(3), P = 0.003), CD8(+) (330.9 ± 156.3/mm(3) vs 478.9 ± 164.6/mm(3), P = 0.002), and CD19(+) (108.8 ± 64.2/mm(3) vs 264.6 ± 88.0/mm(3), P < 0.0001). In these patients, the CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio and the number of NK lymphocytes was not significantly different, compared to controls. Comparing patients with liver cirrhosis but without active alcohol consumption (n = 11), we also found significant lymphopenia (1.3 × 10(9)/L ± 0.6 × 10(9)/L vs 2.1 × 10(9)/L ± 0.5 × 10(9)/L, P < 0.0001) and decreases in populations of CD3(+) (945.5 ± 547.4/mm(3) vs 1523.0 ± 364.6/mm(3), P = 0.003), CD4(+) (745.2 ± 389.0/mm(3) vs 992.4 ± 274.7/mm(3), P = 0.032), CD8(+) (233.9 ± 120.0/mm(3) vs 478.9 ± 164.6/mm(3), P < 0.0001), and CD19(+) (150.8 ± 76.1/mm(3) vs 264.6 ± 88.0/mm(3), P = 0.001). The NK lymphocyte count was not significantly different, but, in this group, there was a significant increase in the CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio (3.5 ± 1.3 vs 2.3 ± 0.9, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

All patient subsets presented with decreased lymphocyte counts, but only patients with advanced fibrosis presented with a significant increase in the CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio.

Role of adaptive immunity in alcoholic liver disease

Stimulation of innate immunity is increasingly recognized to play an important role in the pathogenesis of alcoholic liver disease (ALD), while the contribution of adaptive immunity has received less attention. Clinical and experimental data show the involvement of Th-1 and Th-17 T-lymphocytes in alcoholic hepatitis. Nonetheless, the mechanisms by which alcohol triggers adaptive immunity are still incompletely characterized. Patients with advanced ALD have circulating IgG and T-lymphocytes recognizing epitopes derived from protein modification by hydroxyethyl free radicals and end products of lipid-peroxidation. High titers of IgG against lipid peroxidation-derived antigens are associated with an increased hepatic production of proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines. Moreover, the same antigens favor the breaking of self-tolerance towards liver constituents. In particular, autoantibodies against cytochrome P4502E1 (CYP2E1) are evident in a subset of ALD patients. Altogether these results suggest that allo- and autoimmune reactions triggered by oxidative stress might contribute to hepatic inflammation during the progression of ALD.

Immune mechanisms in alcoholic liver disease

Growing evidence indicates that inflammatory reactions play an important role in the pathogenesis of alcoholic liver disease (ALD). The implication of immunity in fueling chronic inflammation in ALD has emerged from clinical and experimental evidence showing the recruitment and the activation of lymphocytes in the inflammatory infiltrates of ALD and has received further support by the recent demonstration of a role of Th17 lymphocytes in alcoholic hepatitis. Nonetheless, the mechanisms by which alcohol triggers adaptive immune responses are still incompletely characterized. Patients with advanced ALD show a high prevalence of circulating IgG and T-lymphocytes towards epitopes derived from protein modification by hydroxyethyl free radicals (HER) and end-products of lipid peroxidation. In both chronic alcohol-fed rats and heavy drinkers the elevation of IgG against lipid peroxidation-derived antigens is associated with an increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines and with the severity of histological signs of liver inflammation. Moreover, CYP2E1-alkylation by HER favors the development of anti-CYP2E1 auto-antibodies in a sub-set of ALD patients. Altogether, these results suggest that allo- and auto-immune reactions triggered by oxidative stress might contribute to fuel chronic hepatic inflammation during the progression of ALD.

Interplay between oxidative stress and immunity in the progression of alcohol-mediated liver injury

Inflammation is recognized increasingly as having an important role in the pathogenesis of alcoholic liver disease (ALD). Nonetheless, the mechanisms by which alcohol maintains hepatic inflammation are still characterized incompletely. Several studies have demonstrated that ethanol-induced oxidative stress promotes immune responses in ALD by stimulating both humoral and cellular reactions against liver proteins adducted to hydroxyethyl free radicals and several lipid peroxidation products. Moreover, ALD patients have autoantibodies targeting cytochrome P4502E1 and oxidized phospholipids. In both chronic alcohol-fed rats and heavy drinkers, the elevation of IgG against lipid peroxidation-derived antigens is associated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha production and the severity of liver inflammation. On this basis, we propose that allo- and autoimmune reactions associated with oxidative stress might contribute to fueling hepatic inflammation in ALD.

Alcohol metabolism: role in toxicity and carcinogenesis

This article contains the proceedings of a symposium at the 2002 RSA Meeting in San Francisco, organized and co-chaired by Thomas M. Badger, Paul Shih-Jiun Yin, and Helmut Seitz. The presentations were (1) First-pass metabolism of ethanol: Basic and clinical aspects, by Charles Lieber; (2) Intracellular CYP2E1 transport, oxidative stress, cytokine release, and ALD, by Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg; (3) Pulsatile ethanol metabolism in intragastric infusion models: Potential role in toxic outcomes, by Thomas M. Badger and Martin J.J. Ronis; (4) Free radicals, adducts, and autoantibodies resulting from ethanol metabolism: Role in ethanol-associated toxicity, by Emanuele Albano; and (5) Gastrointestinal metabolism of ethanol and its possible role in carcinogenesis, by Helmut Seitz.

Autoimmune hepatitis: diagnostic criteria, subclassifications, and clinical features

The diagnosis of AIH depends on the finding of several suggestive features together with careful exclusion of liver diseases of other etiologies. Wherever possible, the diagnosis should be confirmed histologically by an experienced hepatopathologist. Seronegativity for the conventional autoantibodies at presentation does not exclude a diagnosis of AIH. It is important to test for anti-LKM1 antibodies to avoid missing a diagnosis of type 2 AIH, with potentially serious consequences. Although the syndrome is associated with characteristic biochemical abnormalities, and biochemical parameters are commonly used for monitoring response to therapy, it should be borne in mind that neither these nor autoantibody titers are completely reliable indices of disease activity. Although the various systems that have been promulgated for classification of the disease may identify different groups of patients on pathogenetic or clinical criteria and are useful for research purposes, none is yet sufficiently exclusive in terms of defining prognosis or planning treatment strategies to be applicable to the individual patient seen in the clinic. Clinical management should therefore continue to be individually tailored.