1
|
Siebers CCN, Appelman L, Kočo L, Palm M, Rainey L, Broeders MJM, Appelman PTM, Go S, Van Oirsouw MCJ, Mann RM. Patients' perceptions of targeted breast ultrasound and digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic setting: A mixed methods study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0308840. [PMID: 39141648 PMCID: PMC11324127 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although DBT is the standard initial imaging modality for women with focal breast symptoms, the importance of ultrasound has grown rapidly in the past decades. Therefore, the Breast UltraSound Trial (BUST) focused on assessing the diagnostic value of ultrasound and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) for the evaluation of breast symptoms by reversing the order of breast imaging; first performing ultrasound followed by DBT. This side-study of the BUST evaluates patients' perceptions of ultrasound and DBT in a reversed setting. METHODS After imaging, 1181/1276 BUST participants completed a survey consisting of open and closed questions regarding both exams (mean age 47.2, ±11.74). Additionally, a different subset of BUST participants (n = 29) participated in six focus group interviews 18-24 months after imaging to analyze their imaging experiences in depth. RESULTS A total of 55.3% of women reported reluctance to undergoing DBT, primarily due of pain, while the vast majority also find bilateral DBT reassuring (87.3%). Thematic analysis identified themes related to 1) imaging reluctance (pain/burden, result, and breast harm) and 2) ultrasound and DBT perceptions. Regarding the latter, the theme comfort underscores DBT as burdensome and painful, while ultrasound is largely perceived as non-burdensome. Ultrasound is also particularly valued for its interactive nature, as highlighted in the theme interaction. Perceived effectiveness reflects women's interest in bilateral breast evaluation with DBT and the visibility of lesions, while they express more uncertainty about the reliability of ultrasound. Emotional impact portrays DBT as reassuring for many women, whereas opinions on the reassurance provided by ultrasound are more diverse. Additional themes include costs, protocols and privacy. CONCLUSIONS Ultrasound is highly tolerated, and particularly valued is the interaction with the radiologist. Nearly half of women express reluctance towards DBT; nevertheless, a large portion report feeling more confident after undergoing bilateral DBT, reassuring them of the absence of abnormalities. Understanding patients' perceptions of breast imaging examinations is of great value when optimizing diagnostic pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen C. N. Siebers
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Appelman
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lejla Kočo
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mette Palm
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Rainey
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille J. M. Broeders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Shirley Go
- Department of Radiology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Marja C. J. Van Oirsouw
- Patient Advocate on Behalf of the Dutch Breast Cancer Society (Borstkanker Vereniging Nederland), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ritse M. Mann
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Elmohr MM, Javed Z, Dubey P, Jordan JE, Shah L, Nasir K, Rohren EM, Lincoln CM. Social Determinants of Health Framework to Identify and Reduce Barriers to Imaging in Marginalized Communities. Radiology 2024; 310:e223097. [PMID: 38376404 PMCID: PMC10902599 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.223097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
Social determinants of health (SDOH) are conditions influencing individuals' health based on their environment of birth, living, working, and aging. Addressing SDOH is crucial for promoting health equity and reducing health outcome disparities. For conditions such as stroke and cancer screening where imaging is central to diagnosis and management, access to high-quality medical imaging is necessary. This article applies a previously described structural framework characterizing the impact of SDOH on patients who require imaging for their clinical indications. SDOH factors can be broadly categorized into five sectors: economic stability, education access and quality, neighborhood and built environment, social and community context, and health care access and quality. As patients navigate the health care system, they experience barriers at each step, which are significantly influenced by SDOH factors. Marginalized communities are prone to disparities due to the inability to complete the required diagnostic or screening imaging work-up. This article highlights SDOH that disproportionately affect marginalized communities, using stroke and cancer as examples of disease processes where imaging is needed for care. Potential strategies to mitigate these disparities include dedicating resources for clinical care coordinators, transportation, language assistance, and financial hardship subsidies. Last, various national and international health initiatives are tackling SDOH and fostering health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohab M. Elmohr
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, 1 Baylor Plaza, BCM 360, Houston, TX 77030 (M.M.E., E.M.R.); Division of Health Equity and Disparities Research, Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (Z.J., K.N.); Houston Radiology Associates, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (P.D.); ACR Commission on Neuroradiology, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (J.E.J.); Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (J.E.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (L.S.); Division of Cardiovascular Prevention and Wellness, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Tex (K.N.); Center for Cardiovascular Computational Health & Precision Medicine (C3-PH), Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (K.N.); and Department of Neuroradiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (C.M.L.)
| | - Zulqarnain Javed
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, 1 Baylor Plaza, BCM 360, Houston, TX 77030 (M.M.E., E.M.R.); Division of Health Equity and Disparities Research, Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (Z.J., K.N.); Houston Radiology Associates, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (P.D.); ACR Commission on Neuroradiology, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (J.E.J.); Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (J.E.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (L.S.); Division of Cardiovascular Prevention and Wellness, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Tex (K.N.); Center for Cardiovascular Computational Health & Precision Medicine (C3-PH), Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (K.N.); and Department of Neuroradiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (C.M.L.)
| | - Prachi Dubey
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, 1 Baylor Plaza, BCM 360, Houston, TX 77030 (M.M.E., E.M.R.); Division of Health Equity and Disparities Research, Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (Z.J., K.N.); Houston Radiology Associates, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (P.D.); ACR Commission on Neuroradiology, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (J.E.J.); Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (J.E.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (L.S.); Division of Cardiovascular Prevention and Wellness, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Tex (K.N.); Center for Cardiovascular Computational Health & Precision Medicine (C3-PH), Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (K.N.); and Department of Neuroradiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (C.M.L.)
| | - John E. Jordan
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, 1 Baylor Plaza, BCM 360, Houston, TX 77030 (M.M.E., E.M.R.); Division of Health Equity and Disparities Research, Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (Z.J., K.N.); Houston Radiology Associates, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (P.D.); ACR Commission on Neuroradiology, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (J.E.J.); Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (J.E.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (L.S.); Division of Cardiovascular Prevention and Wellness, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Tex (K.N.); Center for Cardiovascular Computational Health & Precision Medicine (C3-PH), Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (K.N.); and Department of Neuroradiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (C.M.L.)
| | - Lubdha Shah
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, 1 Baylor Plaza, BCM 360, Houston, TX 77030 (M.M.E., E.M.R.); Division of Health Equity and Disparities Research, Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (Z.J., K.N.); Houston Radiology Associates, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (P.D.); ACR Commission on Neuroradiology, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (J.E.J.); Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (J.E.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (L.S.); Division of Cardiovascular Prevention and Wellness, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Tex (K.N.); Center for Cardiovascular Computational Health & Precision Medicine (C3-PH), Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (K.N.); and Department of Neuroradiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (C.M.L.)
| | - Khurram Nasir
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, 1 Baylor Plaza, BCM 360, Houston, TX 77030 (M.M.E., E.M.R.); Division of Health Equity and Disparities Research, Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (Z.J., K.N.); Houston Radiology Associates, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (P.D.); ACR Commission on Neuroradiology, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (J.E.J.); Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (J.E.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (L.S.); Division of Cardiovascular Prevention and Wellness, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Tex (K.N.); Center for Cardiovascular Computational Health & Precision Medicine (C3-PH), Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (K.N.); and Department of Neuroradiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (C.M.L.)
| | - Eric M. Rohren
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, 1 Baylor Plaza, BCM 360, Houston, TX 77030 (M.M.E., E.M.R.); Division of Health Equity and Disparities Research, Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (Z.J., K.N.); Houston Radiology Associates, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (P.D.); ACR Commission on Neuroradiology, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (J.E.J.); Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (J.E.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (L.S.); Division of Cardiovascular Prevention and Wellness, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Tex (K.N.); Center for Cardiovascular Computational Health & Precision Medicine (C3-PH), Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (K.N.); and Department of Neuroradiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (C.M.L.)
| | - Christie M. Lincoln
- From the Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, 1 Baylor Plaza, BCM 360, Houston, TX 77030 (M.M.E., E.M.R.); Division of Health Equity and Disparities Research, Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (Z.J., K.N.); Houston Radiology Associates, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (P.D.); ACR Commission on Neuroradiology, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va (J.E.J.); Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (J.E.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (L.S.); Division of Cardiovascular Prevention and Wellness, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Tex (K.N.); Center for Cardiovascular Computational Health & Precision Medicine (C3-PH), Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (K.N.); and Department of Neuroradiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (C.M.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cao DJ, Alabousi M, Farshait N, Patlas MN. Barriers to Screening At-risk Populations in Canada. Can Assoc Radiol J 2023; 74:508-513. [PMID: 36573884 DOI: 10.1177/08465371221147307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer screening is invaluable for early detection of disease, including for breast and lung cancer. Through early detection, cancer treatment can be commenced prior to the development of advanced stage disease, significantly reducing morbidity and mortality. However, eligible patients may face barriers when accessing screening services, and some groups may be more disproportionately affected than others. This review aims to describe some of the most prominent barriers that at-risk populations may face when accessing image-based cancer screening services in Canada. Characterizing these barriers would be helpful in determining the best strategies to increase uptake to these screening services and, consequently, improve health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Cao
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Nataly Farshait
- Healthcare Insurance Reciprocal of Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael N Patlas
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Biederman E, Baltic R, Katz ML, Rawl S, Vachon E, Monahan PO, Stump TE, Kettler C, Carter L, Young G, Xu W, Paskett ED, Champion V. Increasing breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening among rural women: Baseline characteristics of a randomized control trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 123:106986. [PMID: 36328234 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rural women suffer disproportionately from breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer mortality compared to those in urban areas. Screening behaviors for these three cancers share many similar beliefs and barriers. Unfortunately, published interventions have not attempted to simultaneously bring women up to date with screening for three cancers (breast, cervical, and colorectal) even though multiple behavior change interventions are effective. The aim of this randomized controlled study was to compare the effectiveness of a mailed interactive and tailored DVD vs. DVD plus telephonic patient navigation (DVD + PN) vs. Usual Care (UC) to increase the percentage of rural women (aged 50-74) up to date for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. METHODS Nine hundred eighty-three participants needing one, two, or three cancer screening tests were consented and randomized to one of three groups. Prior to randomization, women were assessed for baseline characteristics including sociodemographics, health status, and cancer screening test beliefs. Screening status was assessed by medical record review. RESULTS At baseline, the average age of participants was 58.6 years. Nineteen percent of the sample was not up to date with screenings for all three cancers. Colorectal cancer had the highest percentage of women (69%) who were not up to date with screening followed by cervical (57%) and then breast cancer (41%). Sixty percent of women reported receiving a reminder for mammography; 30%, for cervical cancer screening; 15% for colonoscopy; and 6% for FOBT/FIT. DISCUSSION Increasing adherence to colorectal cancer screening may be the most urgent need among all screening tests. This clinical trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov with identifier NCT02795104.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Biederman
- The Ohio State University (OSU) Comprehensive Cancer Center, Suite 525, 1590 North High Street, Columbus, OH 43201, United States of America.
| | - Ryan Baltic
- The OSU Comprehensive Cancer Center, Suite 525, 1590 North High Street, Columbus, OH 43201, United States of America.
| | - Mira L Katz
- College of Public Health and the OSU Comprehensive Cancer Center, Suite 525, 1590 North High Street, Columbus, OH 43201, United States of America.
| | - Susan Rawl
- Indiana School of Nursing and the Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, 600 Barnhill Drive, NU345E Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
| | - Eric Vachon
- Indiana University School of Nursing and Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, 600 Barnhill Drive, NUW427 Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
| | - Patrick O Monahan
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Medicine & Fairbanks School of Public Health, Biostatistics and Data Management Core, Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, 410 W. 10(th) St., Suite 3000, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States of America.
| | - Timothy E Stump
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Medicine, 410 W. 10(th) St, Suite 3000, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States of America.
| | - Carla Kettler
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, 410 W. 10(th) St., Suite 3000, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States of America.
| | - Lisa Carter
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Avenue, 7(th) Floor, New York, NY 10022, United States of America.
| | - Gregory Young
- The Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Department of Biomedical Informatics, 1800 Cannon Dr., Columbus, OH 43210, United States of America
| | - Wendy Xu
- College of Public Health and The OSU Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1841 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, United States of America.
| | - Electra D Paskett
- College of Medicine and The Ohio State University (OSU) Comprehensive Cancer Center, Suite 525, 1590 North High Street, Columbus, OH 43201, United States of America.
| | - Victoria Champion
- Indiana School of Nursing and IU Comprehensive Cancer Center, 600 Barnhill Drive, NU317 Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Htay MNN, Dahlui M, Schliemann D, Loh SY, Ibrahim Tamin NSB, Somasundaram S, Donnelly M, Su TT. Women's health beliefs and uptake of breast cancer screening in Malaysia. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13675. [PMID: 35946147 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study investigated women's health beliefs, the use of breast cancer (BC) screening services, and the factors that potentially influence uptake of screening. METHODS Face-to-face interviews were conducted with a randomly selected community sample of 992 women (>40 years old) in Selangor State, Malaysia. RESULTS Approximately 35% of women received a clinical breast examination (CBE) and 27% had a mammogram within the last 1 to 2 years. The regression analyses indicated that Chinese ethnicity has higher perceived susceptibility to BC compared to Malay ethnicity (mean 7.74, SD: 2.75; 95% CI 0.09, 1.03) whilst a lower perceived susceptibility was observed in women aged ≥70 years (mean 6.67, SD: 3.01; 95% CI -1.66, -0.24) compared to women aged 40-49 years. Indian Malaysian women (mean 16.87, SD: 2.59; 95% CI 0.12, 1.01) and women who had received a CBE (mean 16.10, SD:2.35; 95% CI 0.18, 0.89) were more likely to have higher perceived benefits scoring. Indian ethnicity, secondary education and tertiary education, top 20% income group, past history of CBE and mammogram uptake were significantly associated with lower barriers scoring. CONCLUSIONS There is a need to target BC screening uptake improvement programmes towards communities in which women experience disadvantages related to income, education, employment, and, in particular, to tailor programmes to take into consideration differences between ethnic groups regarding their beliefs about cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mila Nu Nu Htay
- Centre for Population Health (CePH), Department of Social and Preventive, Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.,Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Manipal University College Malaysia, Melaka, Malaysia
| | - Maznah Dahlui
- Centre for Population Health (CePH), Department of Social and Preventive, Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.,Department of Health Policy and Administration, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Désirée Schliemann
- Centre for Public Health and UKCRC, Centre of Excellence for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Siew Yim Loh
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | | | - Michael Donnelly
- Centre for Public Health and UKCRC, Centre of Excellence for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Tin Tin Su
- Centre for Population Health (CePH), Department of Social and Preventive, Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.,South East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO) and Global Public Health, Jeffery Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Miles RC, Flores EJ, Carlos RC, Boakye-Ansa NK, Brown C, Sohn YJ, Narayan AK. Impact of Health Care-Associated Cost Concerns on Mammography Utilization: Cross-Sectional Survey Results From the National Health Interview Survey. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:1081-1087. [PMID: 35879187 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Health care-related cost concerns and financial toxicity are increasingly recognized barriers along the breast cancer care continuum. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between patient-reported cost concerns and screening mammography utilization. METHODS Survey participants aged 40 to 74 years from the 2018 National Health Interview Survey without personal history of breast cancer were included (response rate: 64%). Respondents were queried if they had experienced specific access-related health care barriers. Multiple variable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between barriers to care and patient-reported screening mammography utilization. RESULTS Of survey respondents, 7,511 women were included. Of this group, 68.9% reported receiving a screening mammogram within the last 2 years and 52.2% reported receiving a screening mammogram within the last year. Of all survey respondents, 48.4% reported worry paying medical bills. Patients who reported worry about paying medical bills (odds ratio [OR] 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-0.97; P = .01), challenges affording dental care (OR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.54-0.77; P < .01), and challenges affording eyeglasses (OR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.54-0.84; P < .01) were less likely to report screening mammography use than their respective counterparts. Patients who skipped medication doses (OR 0.69; 95% CI: 0.52-0.91; P < .01), took less medication, (OR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.48-0.82; P < .01), and delayed filling prescriptions (OR 0.71; 95% CI: 0.56-0.90; P < .01) to save money were also less likely to report receiving mammography screening. CONCLUSION Patient-reported cost-related barriers are associated with decreased utilization of routine mammography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randy C Miles
- Chief, Breast Imaging and Associate Director, Research in Radiology, Denver Health, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado.
| | - Efren J Flores
- Associate Chair, Equity, Inclusion and Community Health, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ruth C Carlos
- Assistant Chair, Clinical Research, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Editor-in-Chief, JACR
| | | | - Corey Brown
- Meharry Medical College, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Young-Jin Sohn
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anand K Narayan
- Vice Chair, Equity, Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Effect of Out-of-Pocket Costs on Subsequent Mammography Screening. J Am Coll Radiol 2021; 19:24-34. [PMID: 34748732 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although the Affordable Care Act eliminated cost sharing for screening mammography, a concern is that grandfathered plans, diagnostic mammograms, and follow-up testing may still lead to out-of-pocket (OOP) spending. Our study examines how OOP spending among women at their baseline screening mammogram may impact the decision to receive subsequent screening. METHODS The study included commercially insured women aged 40 to 41 years with a screening mammogram between 2011 and 2014. We estimated multivariate linear probability models of the effect of OOP spending at the baseline mammogram on subsequent screening 12 to 36 months later. RESULTS Having any OOP payments for the baseline screening mammogram significantly reduced the probability of screening in the subsequent 12 to 24 months by 3.0 percentage points (pp) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-4.8 pp decrease). For every $100 increase in the OOP expenses for the baseline mammogram, the likelihood of subsequent screening within 12 to 24 months decreased by 1.9 pp (95% CI: 0.8-3.1 pp decrease). Similarly, any OOP spending for follow-up tests resulting from the baseline screening led to a 2.7 pp lower probability of screening 12 to 24 months later (95% CI: 0.9-4.1 pp decrease). Higher OOP expenses were associated with significantly lower screening 24 to 36 months later (coefficient = -0.014, 95% CI: -0.025 to -0.003). DISCUSSION Although cost sharing has been eliminated for screening mammograms, OOP costs may still arise, particularly for diagnostic and follow-up testing services, both of which may reduce rates of subsequent screening. For preventive services, reducing or eliminating cost sharing through policy and legislation may be important to ensuring continued adherence to screening guidelines.
Collapse
|
8
|
Tsapatsaris A, Reichman M. Project ScanVan: Mobile mammography services to decrease socioeconomic barriers and racial disparities among medically underserved women in NYC. Clin Imaging 2021; 78:60-63. [PMID: 33770557 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.02.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether, with access to free screening services, uninsured minority women in NYC are able to successfully manage existing barriers to breast cancer screening. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study, with permission to use de-identified data received from Project Renewal's ScanVan in 2019. Project Renewal ScanVan provides clinical breast exams, mammograms, and health education to low-income women. The screening mammograms were conducted in the ScanVan and read by a board-certified radiologist. The electronic medical records were reviewed with respect to the patients' BI-RADS category, insurance status, race, and age. Descriptive statistics were performed and cancer detection rate, recall rate, and positive predictive values (PPV1, PPV2, PPV3) were calculated. RESULTS In 2019, 66% (2499 of 3745) of patients who used the ScanVan were Hispanic & African American. 43% (1627 of 3745) of the women were uninsured, 15% (579 of 3745) of the women had Medicare, and 18% (676 of 3745) classified as other. 17 out of 3745 patients screened received a new diagnosis of breast cancer, corresponding to a cancer detection rate of 4.5/1000 screened. 258 were recalled, corresponding with a recall rate of 7%. The PPV1 was 6.5% (17/258); PPV2 was 29.8% (17/57); and PPV3 was 34% (17/50). CONCLUSION Barriers to breast cancer screening include lack of medical insurance, limited access to care, and the absence of a primary care physician. The mobile mammography screening van successfully overcame such barriers, providing uninsured women from racial minority groups with vital breast cancer screening and follow up care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ava Tsapatsaris
- Eastchester High School, Student, 2 Stewart Pl, Eastchester, New York, 10709, USA.
| | - Melissa Reichman
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Radiology, 525 East 68th street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Reduced Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer among Women with Visual Impairment. Ophthalmology 2020; 128:317-323. [PMID: 32682837 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Timely mammography to screen for breast cancer in accordance with the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations can reduce morbidity and mortality substantially. This study assessed whether the odds of undergoing screening mammography are similar for women with and without visual impairment (VI). DESIGN Retrospective, longitudinal cohort study. PARTICIPANTS Women aged 65 to 72 years enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2015. METHODS Patients with no vision loss (NVL), partial vision loss (PVL), and severe vision loss (SVL) were matched 1:1:1 based on age, race, time in Medicare, urbanicity of residence, and overall health. Women with pre-existing breast cancer were excluded. Multivariable conditional logistic regression modeling compared the odds of undergoing screening mammography within a 2-year follow-up period among the 3 groups. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES Proportion of participants undergoing mammography and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of undergoing mammography within 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS A total of 1044 patients were matched (348 in each group). The mean ± standard deviation age at the index date was 69.0 ± 1.5 years for all 3 groups. The proportion of women undergoing 1 mammography screening or more within the 2-year follow-up was 69.0% (n = 240), 56.9% (n = 198), and 56.0% (n = 195) for the NVL, PVL, and SVL groups, respectively (P = 0.0005). The mean ± standard deviation number of mammography screenings undergone per patient during the 5-year period (3-year look-back plus 2-year follow-up) was 3.1 ± 2.0, 2.5 ± 2.0, and 2.3 ± 2.1 for the NVL, PVL, and SVL groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). Women with SVL had 42% decreased odds (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37-0.90; P = 0.01), and those with PVL had 44% decreased odds (OR, 0.56; CI, 0.36-0.87; P = 0.009) of undergoing mammography during follow-up compared with those with NVL. CONCLUSIONS Women with VI were significantly less likely to undergo mammography screening for breast cancer than women without VI. Clinicians should look for ways to help ensure that patients with VI undergo mammography and other preventive screenings as recommended by the USPSTF.
Collapse
|
10
|
VanDyke SD, Shell MD. Health Beliefs and Breast Cancer Screening in Rural Appalachia: An Evaluation of the Health Belief Model. J Rural Health 2016; 33:350-360. [DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2016] [Revised: 06/10/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Santana D. VanDyke
- School of Medicine; The University of Virginia; Charlottesville Virginia
| | - Madelynn D. Shell
- Department of Social Sciences; The University of Virginia's College at Wise; Wise Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rust G, Zhang S, Malhotra K, Reese L, McRoy L, Baltrus P, Caplan L, Levine RS. Paths to health equity: Local area variation in progress toward eliminating breast cancer mortality disparities, 1990-2009. Cancer 2015; 121:2765-74. [PMID: 25906833 PMCID: PMC4540479 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2014] [Revised: 02/06/2015] [Accepted: 03/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND US breast cancer deaths have been declining since 1989, but African American women are still more likely than white women to die of breast cancer. Black/white disparities in breast cancer mortality rate ratios have actually been increasing. METHODS Across 762 US counties with enough deaths to generate reliable rates, county-level, age-adjusted breast cancer mortality rates were examined for women who were 35 to 74 years old during the period of 1989-2010. Twenty-two years of mortality data generated twenty 3-year rolling average data points, each centered on a specific year from 1990 to 2009. Mixed linear models were used to group each county into 1 of 4 mutually exclusive trend patterns. The most recent 3-year average black breast cancer mortality rate for each county was also categorized as being worse or not worse than the breast cancer mortality rate for the total US population. RESULTS More than half of the counties (54%) showed persistent, unchanging disparities. Roughly 1 in 4 (24%) had a divergent pattern of worsening black/white disparities. However, 10.5% of the counties sustained racial equality over the 20-year period, and 11.7% of the counties actually showed a converging pattern from high disparities to greater equality. Twenty-three counties had 2008-2010 black mortality rates better than the US average mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS Disparities are not inevitable. Four US counties have sustained both optimal and equitable black outcomes as measured by both absolute (better than the US average) and relative benchmarks (equality in the local black/white rate ratio) for decades, and 6 counties have shown a path from disparities to health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Rust
- National Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Community Health & Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Family Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Shun Zhang
- National Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Community Health & Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Khusdeep Malhotra
- National Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Community Health & Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Leroy Reese
- National Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Community Health & Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Luceta McRoy
- National Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Peter Baltrus
- National Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Community Health & Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Lee Caplan
- Department of Community Health & Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Robert S Levine
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Davis TC, Arnold CL, Bennett CL, Wolf MS, Liu D, Rademaker A. Sustaining mammography screening among the medically underserved: a follow-up evaluation. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2015; 24:291-8. [PMID: 25692910 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our previous three-arm comparative effectiveness intervention in community clinic patients who were not up-to-date with screening resulted in mammography rates over 50% in all arms. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the three interventions on improving biennial screening rates among eligible patients. METHODS A three-arm quasi-experimental evaluation was conducted in eight community clinics from 2008 to 2011. Screening efforts included (1) enhanced care: Participants received an in-person recommendation from a research assistant (RA) in year 1, and clinics followed usual clinic protocol for scheduling screening mammograms; (2) education intervention: Participants received education and in-person recommendation from an RA in year 1, and clinics followed usual clinic protocol for scheduling mammograms; or (3) nurse support: A nurse manager provided in-person education and recommendation, scheduled mammograms, and followed up with phone support. In all arms, mammography was offered at no cost to uninsured patients. RESULTS Of 624 eligible women, biennial mammography within 24-30 months of their previous test was performed for 11.0% of women in the enhanced-care arm, 7.1% in the education- intervention arm, and 48.0% in the nurse-support arm (p<0.0001). The incremental cost was $1,232 per additional woman undergoing screening with nurse support vs. enhanced care and $1,092 with nurse support vs. education. CONCLUSIONS Biennial mammography screening rates were improved by providing nurse support but not with enhanced care or education. However, this approach was not cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terry C Davis
- 1 Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center , Shreveport, Louisiana
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Plescia M, Wong F, Pieters J, Joseph D. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program in the era of health reform: a vision forward. Cancer 2014; 120 Suppl 16:2620-4. [PMID: 25099907 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2014] [Accepted: 03/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
For the last 22 years, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) has provided high quality breast and cervical cancer screening to women who do not have health insurance or who have inadequate insurance. As the health care landscape changes, it is time for CDC to address new identified needs and opportunities to increase cancer screening and to further explore new or expanded roles for the program looking to the future. The NBCCEDP is well positioned to build upon its experience, established clinical and community partnerships, and success in serving disadvantaged and diverse populations to address important barriers to cancer screening that will persist as health reform is implemented. Additionally, the program can adapt its extensive experience with establishing and managing an organized system of delivering cancer screening and apply it to promote a more organized approach to screening through health care systems on a population level. Emphasis is placed on the implementation of evidenced-based interventions proven effective in increasing cancer screening rates, promising practices and other organizational policy and health systems interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Plescia
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alcusky M, Philpotts L, Bonafede M, Clarke J, Skoufalos A. The Patient Burden of Screening Mammography Recall. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2014; 23 Suppl 1:S11-9. [DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2014.1511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Alcusky
- Jefferson School of Population Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Janice Clarke
- Jefferson School of Population Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Davis TC, Rademaker A, Bennett CL, Wolf MS, Carias E, Reynolds C, Liu D, Arnold CL. Improving mammography screening among the medically underserved. J Gen Intern Med 2014; 29:628-35. [PMID: 24366401 PMCID: PMC3965756 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-013-2743-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2012] [Revised: 07/27/2013] [Accepted: 12/02/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alternative interventions designed to promote mammography in safety-net settings. METHODS A three-arm, quasi-experimental evaluation was conducted among eight federally qualified health clinics in predominately rural Louisiana. Mammography screening efforts included: 1) enhanced care, 2) health literacy-informed education of patients, and 3) education plus nurse support. Outcomes included mammography screening completion within 6 months and incremental cost-effectiveness. RESULTS Overall, 1,181 female patients ages 40 and over who were eligible for routine mammography were recruited. Baseline screening rates were < 10%. Post intervention screening rates were 55.7% with enhanced care, 51.8% with health literacy-informed education and 65.8% with education and nurse support. After adjusting for race, marital status, self-efficacy and literacy, patients receiving health-literacy informed education were not more likely to complete mammographic screening than those receiving enhanced care; those additionally receiving nurse support were 1.37-fold more likely to complete mammographic screening than those receiving the brief education (95% Confidence Interval 1.08-1.74, p = 0.01). The incremental cost per additional women screened was $2,457 for literacy-informed education with nurse support over literacy-informed education alone. CONCLUSIONS Mammography rates were increased substantially over existing baseline rates in all three arms with the educational initiative, with nurse support and follow-up being the most effective option. However, it is not likely to be cost-effective or affordable in resource-limited clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terry C Davis
- Department of Medicine and Pediatrics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71130, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shi L, Xie Y, Liu J, Kissinger P, Khan M. Is out-of-pocket cost a barrier to receiving repeat tests for chlamydia and gonorrhoea? Int J STD AIDS 2013; 24:301-6. [PMID: 23970662 DOI: 10.1177/0956462412472821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to examine whether out-of-pocket (OOP) costs associated with chlamydia (CT) and gonorrhoea (GC) screening tests is a barrier to receiving CT/GC re-screening and follow-up annual screening. A major health insurance claims database 2006-2010 was used for analysis. The date of first CT/GC diagnosis was used as the index date, and OOP costs at index date for screening tests were retrieved. A re-screening test and an annual screening were defined as tests that occurred within 90-180 days and 181-395 days of the index date, respectively. Re-screening rates were 11.7% and 10.9% and annual screening rates were 24.7% and 23.7% for CT and GC cases, respectively. Compared with the CT patients without OOP expenses, those with OOP expenses of $30 or higher had significantly reduced likelihood of receiving re-screening and annual screening. Similar results were found for GC patients. We concluded that OOP costs serve as a significant barrier to re-screening and annual screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Shi
- Department of Global Health Systems and Development, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine,Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhou HJ, Li SC, Naidoo N, Zhu F, Yeoh KG. Empirical evidence of the continuing improvement in cost efficiency of an endoscopic surveillance programme for gastric cancer in Singapore from 2004 to 2010. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13:139. [PMID: 23587354 PMCID: PMC3637081 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2012] [Accepted: 04/05/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Endoscopic surveillance has been proven effective in prolonging the survival of gastric cancer (GC) patients. However, there is limited evidence on the cost efficiency of delivering this intervention, especially on a national level in spite of cost efficiency being a major determinant of the actual cost-effectiveness of a cancer prevention programme. The Singapore Gastric Cancer Epidemiology Clinical and Genetic Programme (GCEP) is a demonstration project offering scheduled endoscopy to the Chinese population aged 50 years or older in Singapore. By assessing the cost efficiency of the GCEP, this study aimed to provide empirical evidence on the cost structure and mechanisms underlying cost generation in conducting GC surveillance, thus informing resource allocation and programme budgeting for the Singapore government. Methods From a societal perspective, we reported on the direct cost (resource consumption) of conducting endoscopic surveillance through the GCEP network. We retrospectively collected individual-level data of 216 subjects recruited at the National University Hospital, Singapore from 01/04/2004 to 31/10/2010. The Overall Cost, Clinical Cost, GCEP Cost and Personal Cost incurred in serving one subject was computed and discounted as 2004 US dollar (US$) per capita for every year. The Generalized Estimation Equation (GEE) was used to model the data. Results All cost indices continuously declined over the 6.5-year costing period. For the total sample, Overall Cost, Clinical Cost, GCEP Cost and Personal Cost declined by 42.3%, 54.1%, 30% and 25.7% respectively. This downward trend existed for age and gender subgroups and the high risk group only with cost reductions varying between 3.5% and 58.4%. The GEE models confirmed statistical significance of the downward trend and of its association with risk profile, where the moderate risk group had cost indices at most 77% of the high risk group. Conclusions Our study offered empirical evidence of improved cost efficiency of a surveillance programme for GC in the early phase of programme implementation. Mechanisms such as economies of scale and self-learning were found to be involved in the cost reduction. Our findings highlighted the importance of assessing the cost efficiency and offered valuable insights for future programme budgeting and policy making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Jun Zhou
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, MD3, 16 Medical Drive, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Breast cancer (BRCA) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer among women in the USA, and mammography is an effective means for the early detection of BRCA. Identifying the barriers to screening mammography can inform research, policy and practice aiming to increase mammography adherence. A literature review was conducted to determine common barriers to screening mammography adherence. PsycINFO and PubMed databases were searched to identify studies published between 2000 and 2012 that examined barriers associated with reduced mammography adherence. Three thematic groups of barriers, based on social ecology, were identified from the literature: healthcare system-level, social and individual-level barriers. Researchers must consider screening behaviour in context and, therefore, should simultaneously consider each level of barriers when attempting to understand screening behaviour and create interventions to increase mammography adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Sarma
- a Department of Psychology , Stony Brook University , Stony Brook , NY 11794-2500 , USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vyas A, Madhavan S, LeMasters T, Atkins E, Gainor S, Kennedy S, Kelly K, Vona-Davis L, Remick S. Factors influencing adherence to mammography screening guidelines in Appalachian women participating in a mobile mammography program. J Community Health 2012; 37:632-46. [PMID: 22033614 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-011-9494-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the characteristics (demographic, access to care, health-related behavioral, self and family medical history, psychosocial) of women age 40 years and above who participated in a mobile mammography screening program conducted throughout West Virginia (WV) to determine the factors influencing their self-reported adherence to mammography screening guidelines. Data were analyzed using the Andersen Behavioral Model of Healthcare Utilization framework to determine the factors associated with adherence to mammography screening guidelines in these women. Of the 686 women included in the analysis, 46.2% reported having had a mammogram in the past 2 years. Bivariate analyses showed predisposing factors such as older age and unemployed status, visit to a obstetrician/gynecologist (OB/GYN) in the past year (an enabling factor) and need-related factors such as having a family history of breast cancer (BC), having had breast problems in the past, having had breast biopsy in the past, having had a Pap test in past 2 years, and having had all the screenings for cholesterol, blood glucose, bone mineral density and high blood pressure in past 2 years to be significant predictors of self-reported adherence to mammography guidelines. In the final model, being above 50 years (OR=2.132), being morbidly obese (OR=2.358), having BC-related events and low knowledge about mammography were significant predictors of self-reported adherence. Breast cancer related events seem to be associated with mammography screening adherence in this rural Appalachian population. Increasing adherence to mammography screening may require targeted, community-based educational interventions that precede and complement visits by the mobile mammography unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ami Vyas
- Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center (North), West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506-9510, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Davis TC, Arnold CL, Rademaker A, Bailey SC, Platt DJ, Reynolds C, Esparza J, Liu D, Wolf MS. Differences in barriers to mammography between rural and urban women. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2012; 21:748-55. [PMID: 22519704 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2011.3397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have examined differences between rural and urban women in mammography barriers, knowledge, and experiences. Exploring differences can help inform tailored interventions. METHODS Women, aged ≥40, who had not been screened in the past 2 years were recruited from eight federally qualified health centers across Louisiana. They were given a structured interview assessing mammography knowledge, beliefs, barriers, experiences, and literacy. RESULTS Of the 1189 patients who participated, 65.0% were African American, 61.6% were rural, and 44.0% had low literacy. Contrary to guidelines, most believed mammography should be done annually (74.3%) before age 40 (70.5%). Compared to urban women, rural participants were more likely to believe mammography will find small breast lumps early (34.4% vs. 6.5%, p<0.0001) and strongly disagree that mammography is embarrassing (14.6% vs. 8.4%, p=0.0002) or that they are afraid of finding something wrong (21.2% vs.12.3%, p=0.007). Rural women were more likely to report a physician recommendation for mammography (84.3% vs. 76.5%, p=0.006), but they were less likely to have received education (57.2% vs. 63.6%, p=0.06) or to have ever had a mammogram (74.8% vs. 78.1%, p=0.007). In multivariate analyses controlling for race, literacy, and age, all rural/urban differences remained significant, except for receipt of a mammogram. CONCLUSIONS Most participants were unclear about when they should begin mammography. Rural participants reported stronger positive beliefs, higher self-efficacy, fewer barriers, and having a physician recommendation for mammography but were less likely to receive education or screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terry C Davis
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA 71130, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ahmed NU, Winter K, Albatineh AN, Haber G. Clustering very low-income, insured women's mammography screening barriers into potentially functional subgroups. Womens Health Issues 2012; 22:e259-66. [PMID: 22459695 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2012.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2011] [Revised: 12/12/2011] [Accepted: 02/08/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mammography screening is essential for early detection of breast cancer and increased survival rates. Women, particularly those of low socioeconomic status, face barriers that impede their screening adherence. Although many studies have sought to identify these barriers, more research is needed on to address these obstacles in practice. The objective of this study is to divide mammography screening barriers into functional clusters using empirical evidence, which may guide the development of effective mammography screening promotion messages. METHODS A sample of 173 low-income White and Black women randomly selected from a managed care organization rated each of 21 potential mammography barriers on a scale ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." A maximum clustering similarity method was used to identify relevant clusters of screening barriers. RESULTS Five clusters were derived, with a high similarity index (0.881). Each cluster was named to reflect the shared theme of the barriers within it: Perceived Lack of Value in Health Care, Lack of Information, Mistrust/Skepticism, Medical Delay Behavior, and Anxiety/No Control. A dominant barrier within each cluster was identified, and bivariate correlation coefficients were reported. CONCLUSION Cluster analysis yielded five distinct subgroups of mammography screening barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasar U Ahmed
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
LeMasters T, Sambamoorthi U. A national study of out-of-pocket expenditures for mammography screening. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2011; 20:1775-83. [PMID: 21848432 PMCID: PMC3236989 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify variations in screening mammography expenditures, primarily out-of-pocket and total expenditures, of women 40-64 years of age in the United States and factors associated with variations. METHODS Retrospective analysis of data collected from the 2007 and 2008 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). The sample included 2020 women 40-64 years of age who received one mammogram in 2007 or 2008. Ordinary least squares regression was used to describe relationships among out-of-pocket mammography expenditures, total mammography expenditures, and out-of-pocket mammography expenditures as a percentage of total mammography expenditures and such independent variables as insurance status and type, income, region of the United States, and type of facility where a mammogram was received. RESULTS The average out-of-pocket expenditure for a mammogram in 2007 or 2008 was $33, representing 14.1% of the total mammogram expenditure ($266). After controlling for demographic and health factors, women who were uninsured, were from the Midwest, and had a mammogram at an office-based facility had greater out-of-pocket mammography expenditures. Women who were uninsured, lived in the South, and received their mammogram at an office-based facility had out-of-pocket mammography expenditures that represented a greater proportion of the total mammography expenditures. CONCLUSIONS Large variations in out-of-pocket expenditures were observed among women with and without insurance and between insurance types, geographic regions of the United States, and types of facilities where mammograms were received. A higher financial burden of mammography screening among some subgroups of women may act as a barrier to future mammography screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Traci LeMasters
- School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-9510, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
McAlearney AS, Song PH, Rhoda DA, Tatum C, Lemeshow S, Ruffin M, Harrop JP, Paskett ED. Ohio Appalachian women's perceptions of the cost of cervical cancer screening. Cancer 2010; 116:4727-34. [PMID: 20597135 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite evidence of the importance of cervical cancer screening, screening rates in the United States remain below national prevention goals. Women in the Appalachia Ohio region have higher cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates along with lower cancer screening rates. This study explored the expectations of Appalachian Ohio women with regard to Papanicolaou (Pap) test cost and perceptions of cost as a barrier to screening. METHODS Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 571 women who were part of a multilevel, observational community-based research program in Appalachia Ohio. Eligible women were identified through 14 participating health clinics and asked questions regarding Pap test cost and perceptions of cost as a barrier to screening. Estimates of medical costs were compared with actual costs reported by clinics. RESULTS When asked about how much a Pap test would cost, 80% of the women reported they did not know. Among women who reportedly believed they knew the cost, 40% overestimated test cost. Women who noted cost as a barrier were twice as likely to not receive a test within screening guidelines as those who did not perceive a cost barrier. Furthermore, uninsured women were more than 8.5 times as likely to note cost as a barrier than women with private insurance. CONCLUSIONS Although underserved women in need of cancer screening commonly report cost as a barrier, the findings of the current study suggest that women may have a very limited and often inaccurate understanding concerning Pap test cost. Providing women with this information may help reduce the impact of this barrier to screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Scheck McAlearney
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Levine RS, Rust GS, Pisu M, Agboto V, Baltrus PA, Briggs NC, Zoorob R, Juarez P, Hull PC, Goldzweig I, Hennekens CH. Increased Black-White disparities in mortality after the introduction of lifesaving innovations: a possible consequence of US federal laws. Am J Public Health 2010; 100:2176-84. [PMID: 20864727 PMCID: PMC2951928 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2009.170795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/04/2010] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We explored whether the introduction of 3 lifesaving innovations introduced between 1989 and 1996 increased, decreased, or had no effect on disparities in Black-White mortality in the United States through 2006. METHODS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data were used to assess disease-, age-, gender-, and race-specific changes in mortality after the introduction of highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) for treatment of HIV, surfactants for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, and Medicare reimbursement of mammography screening for breast cancer. RESULTS Disparities in Black-White mortality from HIV significantly increased after the introduction of HAART, surfactant therapy, and reimbursement for screening mammography. Between 1989 and 2006, these circumstances may have accounted for an estimated 22,441 potentially avoidable deaths among Blacks. CONCLUSIONS These descriptive data contribute to the formulation of the hypothesis that federal laws promote increased disparities in Black-White mortality by inadvertently favoring Whites with respect to access to lifesaving innovations. Failure of legislation to address known social factors is a plausible explanation, at least in part, for the observed findings. Further research is necessary to test this hypothesis, including analytic epidemiological studies designed a priori to do so.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S Levine
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN 37205, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Purtzer MA. Processes Inherent in Mammography-Screening Decisions of Rarely or Never-Screened Women. West J Nurs Res 2009; 32:199-217. [DOI: 10.1177/0193945909350740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity. A strong association exists between survival and early detection through regular mammography. Impoverished women underuse this life-saving screening, resulting in a disproportionate cancer burden. The study purpose is to discover the process of rarely or never-screened women’s mammography-screening decisions. The sample consists of five rural, low-income, uninsured, and rarely or never-screened women. Grounded theory methodology is used to generate a new theoretical explanation of mammography-screening decision making. Findings include the central conceptual categories, intuitive dominance and intuitive certainty, which contribute toward an intuitive decision-making default. This intuitive thinking style weaves throughout two interrelated categories: (a) scarce, supportive, relational resources for learning and (b) dichotomous health care—seeking behaviors. Implications focus on a nontraditional client assessment whereby nurses can facilitate relational-based knowledge construction. Recommendations for future research include examination of the process of integrating intuition with reasoned thought for more fully informed decisions.
Collapse
|
26
|
DeFrank JT, Rimer BK, Gierisch JM, Bowling JM, Farrell D, Skinner CS. Impact of mailed and automated telephone reminders on receipt of repeat mammograms: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med 2009; 36:459-67. [PMID: 19362800 PMCID: PMC2698939 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2008] [Revised: 12/01/2008] [Accepted: 01/31/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study compares the efficacy of three types of reminders in promoting annual repeat mammography screening. DESIGN RCT. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Study recruitment occurred in 2004-2005. Participants were recruited through the North Carolina State Health Plan for Teachers and State Employees. All were aged 40-75 years and had a screening mammogram prior to study enrollment. A total of 3547 women completed baseline telephone interviews. INTERVENTION Prior to study recruitment, women were assigned randomly to one of three reminder groups: (1) printed enhanced usual care reminders (EUCRs); (2) automated telephone reminders (ATRs) identical in content to EUCRs; or (3) enhanced letter reminders that included additional information guided by behavioral theory. Interventions were delivered 2-3 months prior to women's mammography due dates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Repeat mammography adherence, defined as having a mammogram no sooner than 10 months and no later than 14 months after the enrollment mammogram. RESULTS Each intervention produced adherence proportions that ranged from 72% to 76%. Post-intervention adherence rates increased by an absolute 17.8% from baseline. Women assigned to ATRs were significantly more likely to have had mammograms than women assigned to EUCRs (p=0.014). Comparisons of reminder efficacy did not vary across key subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Although all reminders were effective in promoting repeat mammography adherence, ATRs were the most effective and lowest in cost. Health organizations should consider using ATRs to maximize proportions of members who receive mammograms at annual intervals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica T DeFrank
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Clark CR, Baril N, Kunicki M, Johnson N, Soukup J, Ferguson K, Lipsitz S, Bigby J. Addressing social determinants of health to improve access to early breast cancer detection: results of the Boston REACH 2010 Breast and Cervical Cancer Coalition Women's Health Demonstration Project. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009; 18:677-90. [PMID: 19445616 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2008.0972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Boston Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH) 2010 Breast and Cervical Cancer Coalition developed a case management intervention for women of African descent to identify and reduce medical and social obstacles to breast cancer screening and following up abnormal results. METHODS We targeted black women at high risk for inadequate cancer screening and follow-up as evidenced by a prior pattern of missed clinic appointments and frequent urgent care use. Case managers provided referrals to address patient-identified social concerns (e.g., transportation, housing, language barriers), as well as navigation to prompt screening and follow-up of abnormal tests. We recruited 437 black women aged 40-75, who received care at participating primary care sites. The study was conducted as a prospective cohort study rather than as a controlled trial and evaluated intervention effects on mammography uptake and longitudinal screening rates via logistic regression and timely follow-up of abnormal tests via Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS A significant increase in screening uptake was found (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.13-2.08). Housing concerns (p < 0.05) and lacking a regular provider (p < 0.01) predicted poor mammography uptake. Years of participation in the intervention increased odds of obtaining recommended screening by 20% (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02-1.40), but this effect was attenuated by covariates (p = 0.53). Timely follow-up for abnormal results was achieved by most women (85%) but could not be attributed to the intervention (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.50-1.80). CONCLUSIONS Case management was successful at promoting mammography screening uptake, although no change in longitudinal patterns was found. Housing concerns and lacking a regular provider should be addressed to promote mammography uptake. Future research should provide social assessment and address social obstacles in a randomized controlled setting to confirm the efficacy of social determinant approaches to improve mammography use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl R Clark
- Center for Community Health and Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Center for Community Health and Health Equity, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Higher Incidence of Aggressive Breast Cancers in African-American Women: A Review. J Natl Med Assoc 2008; 100:698-702. [DOI: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31344-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|