Interprofessional team debriefings with or without an instructor after a simulated crisis scenario: An exploratory case study

Using simulation scenarios and a debriefing structure to promote feedback skills among interprofessional team members in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Team reflexivity and peer feedback in daily clinical work can improve patient safety. However, teams do not always engage in reflection after patient care. A reason could be that team members may lack skills in engaging in team reflection. This study explores the use of interprofessional team-based simulations to encourage and equip teams for reflective conversations in the real-world clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a prospective, explorative study of team members' perceptions of the use of in situ simulation-based scenarios with critically ill patient cases to train team-based reflections and peer feedback. The study took place in two neurological wards. Prior to the intervention, a 1-day observation in each ward and semi-structured short interviews with physicians and nurses were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 94 staff members, 57 nurses, 8 nurse assistants and 29 physicians participated in the in situ simulation scenarios. All team members showed appreciation of the safe learning environment. The authors found that the simulations and the debriefing structure provided an opportunity for training of team reflexivity and feedback. The team members evaluated the simulation-based training very positively, and their initial reaction indicated that they found peer feedback useful for the individual and the team. This approach allowed them to reflect on their own clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

The simulation-based training scenarios and the debriefing structure promoted team members' team reflexivity and peer feedback skills. The method is feasible and could be used in other specialties and situations. The team members' reactions to feedback were positive, and based on their reflections, there is a potential to increase both individual and team skills as well as improve patient treatment.

Learning with our peers: peer-led versus instructor-led debriefing for simulated crises, a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Although peer-assisted learning is known to be effective for reciprocal learning in medical education, it has been understudied in simulation. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of peer-led compared to instructor-led debriefing for non-technical skill development in simulated crisis scenarios.

METHODS

Sixty-one undergraduate medical students were randomized into the control group (instructor-led debriefing) or an intervention group (peer debriefer or peer debriefee group). After the pre-test simulation, the participants underwent two more simulation scenarios, each followed by a debriefing session. After the second debriefing session, the participants underwent an immediate post-test simulation on the same day and a retention post-test simulation two months later. Non-technical skills for the pre-test, immediate post-test, and retention tests were assessed by two blinded raters using the Ottawa Global Rating Scale (OGRS).

RESULTS

The participants' non-technical skill performance significantly improved in all groups from the pre-test to the immediate post-test, with changes in the OGRS scores of 15.0 (95% CI [11.4, 18.7]) in the instructor-led group, 15.3 (11.5, 19.0) in the peer-debriefer group, and 17.6 (13.9, 21.4) in the peer-debriefee group. No significant differences in performance were found, after adjusting for the year of medical school training, among debriefing modalities (P = 0.147) or between the immediate post-test and retention test (P = 0.358).

CONCLUSIONS

Peer-led debriefing was as effective as instructor-led debriefing at improving undergraduate medical students' non-technical skill performance in simulated crisis situations. Peer debriefers also improved their simulated clinical skills. The peer debriefing model is a feasible alternative to the traditional, costlier instructor model.

Fluctuating cohesion: A grounded theory study of nursing students engaged in a combined debriefing format

AIM

This study explored the social processes enacted by nursing students when they engage in a combined format of structured peer debriefing followed by instructor-led debriefing after in-person simulation. The aim was to gain insight into nursing students' perceptions and how peer processes influenced reflection and learning.

BACKGROUND

Debriefing, a key component of clinical simulation, promotes development of nursing students' reflective processes and enhances learning. In-person group-debriefing led by faculty/instructors is the most used debriefing format in healthcare simulation education. Yet, recent studies indicate instructor-led formats may increase students' anxiety and limit their capacity for reflection, a crucial step in clinical reasoning and decision making. Investigations into learner-centered formats support peer debriefing as a reasonable alternative to traditional instructor-led debriefing. However, current peer debriefing studies provide little insight into the social interactions and processes supporting reflection and learning; and little theoretical basis exists for the integration of alternatives to instructor-led debriefing formats (such as peer debriefing) into simulation-based education.

DESIGN

This qualitative study used a Straussian grounded theory design.

METHODS

Senior-level baccalaureate and associate degree nursing students from an U.S. public university with first-hand experience using the combined format of peer debriefing followed by instructor-led debriefing were recruited to participate in focus-group interviews. Data gathered from semi structured interviews were analysed using the iterative process of constant comparison. Theory building was aided using memoing, theoretical sampling and conceptual diagramming.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 34 students. Study findings revealed the core category of the constructed theory, 'Fluctuating cohesion', involved students' pervasive sense of going back and forth between a sense of unity (we-ness) and separatism (me-ness) while engaged in the combined debriefing format. The theory integrated five related categories: discovering the process, normalizing experiences, developing mutuality, dynamic balancing and engaging informal social connections. Findings illustrated the processes students enacted to take ownership for learning and proactively discuss their clinical decision-making with the instructor. In turn, reflection was enhanced by increased receptiveness to subsequent expert feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings demonstrated that augmenting instructor-led debriefing with peer debriefing leveraged the beneficial nature of peer interactions, promoted psychological safety, facilitated nascent team behaviors and enhanced reflective thinking. The resultant theory that was generated from the findings and grounded in participants' experience, provides a meaningful framework that may inform future learner-centered debriefing formats aimed at optimizing debriefing effectiveness.

Exploring in-person self-led debriefings for groups of learners in simulation-based education: an integrative review

BACKGROUND

Facilitator-led debriefings are well-established for debriefing groups of learners in immersive simulation-based education. However, there has been emerging interest in self-led debriefings whereby individuals or groups of learners conduct a debriefing themselves, without the presence of a facilitator. How and why self-led debriefings influence debriefing outcomes remains undetermined.

RESEARCH AIM

The aim of this study was to explore how and why in-person self-led debriefings influence debriefing outcomes for groups of learners in immersive simulation-based education.

METHODS

An integrative review was conducted, searching seven electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, ERIC, SCOPUS, CINAHL Plus, PsychINFO) for peer-reviewed empirical studies investigating in-person self-led debriefings for groups of learners. Data were extracted, synthesised, and underwent reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen empirical studies identified through the search strategy were included in this review. There was significant heterogeneity in respect to study designs, aims, contexts, debriefing formats, learner characteristics, and data collection instruments. The synthesised findings of this review suggest that, across a range of debriefing outcome measures, in-person self-led debriefings for groups of learners following immersive simulation-based education are preferable to conducting no debriefing at all. In certain cultural and professional contexts, such as postgraduate learners and those with previous debriefing experience, self-led debriefings can support effective learning and may provide equivalent educational outcomes to facilitator-led debriefings or self-led and facilitator-led combination strategies. Furthermore, there is some evidence to suggest that self-led and facilitator-led combination approaches may optimise participant learning, with this approach warranting further research. Reflexive thematic analysis of the data revealed four themes, promoting self-reflective practice, experience and background of learners, challenges of conducting self-led debriefings and facilitation and leadership. Similar to facilitator-led debriefings, promoting self-reflective practice within groups of learners is fundamental to how and why self-led debriefings influence debriefing outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In circumstances where simulation resources for facilitator-led debriefings are limited, self-led debriefings can provide an alternative opportunity to safeguard effective learning. However, their true value within the scope of immersive simulation-based education may lie as an adjunctive method alongside facilitator-led debriefings. Further research is needed to explore how to best enable the process of reflective practice within self-led debriefings to understand how, and in which contexts, self-led debriefings are best employed and thus maximise their potential use.

Is it valid to assess an individual's performance in team training simulation when the supporting team are confederates? A controlled and randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

During simulation training, the confederate is a member of the pedagogical team. Its role is to facilitate the interaction between participants and the environment, and is thought to increase realism and immersion. Its influence on participants' performance in full-scale simulation remains however unknown. The purpose of this study was to observe the effect of the presence of confederates on the participants' performance during full-scale simulation of crisis medical situations.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized study comparing 2 parallel groups. Participants were emergency medicine residents engaging in a simulation session, with or without confederates. Participants were then evaluated on their Crisis Resource Management performance (CRM). The overall performance score on the Ottawa Global Rating Scale was assessed as primary outcome and the 5 non-technical CRM skills as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 63 simulation sessions, including 63 residents, were included for statistical analysis (n = 32 for Control group and 31 for Confederate group). The mean Overall Performance score was 3.9 ± 0.8 in the Control group and 4.0 ± 1.1 in the Confederate group, 95% confidence interval of the difference [-0.6; 0.4], p = 0.60. No significant differences between the two groups were observed on each CRM items (leadership, situational awareness, communication, problem solving, resource utilization) CONCLUSION: In this randomized and controlled study, the presence of confederates during full-scale simulated practice of crisis medical situations does not seem to influence the CRM skills performance of Emergency medicine residents.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study does not need to be registered on Clintrial as it does not report a health care intervention on human participants.

Debriefing strategies for interprofessional simulation-a qualitative study

Background

Interprofessional education is becoming more common worldwide. Simulation is one format in which this can effectively take place. The debriefing after the simulation is a critical part of the simulation process as it allows reflection and discussion of concepts that arose during the simulation. Debriefing has been noted to be challenging in the literature. Debriefing after interprofessional simulation (IPS) is likely to have even more challenges, many related to the different backgrounds (profession, specialty) of the learners. This study was designed to investigate: ‘How do differing learner professions impact on delivery of post simulation debriefing after team based interprofessional simulation—what are the challenges and what strategies can be used to overcome them?’

Methods

An initial review of the literature was used to identify current understanding and potential themes requiring further exploration. Using the results from the literature as a starting point for topics and questions to be asked, semi-structured interviews were planned, with those who are experienced in debriefing after IPS. The interviews were transcribed then analysed using a framework analysis.

Results

The literature search resulted in twenty relevant papers. Four dimensions were drawn out from these papers that were directly related to debriefing after IPS: ‘the debriefer’, ‘method of debriefing’, ‘the learner’ and ‘psychological safety’. Sixteen interviews occurred between June and August 2020. Ten themes were extracted from the analysis of the transcripts of these interviews: number and specialty of debriefers, credibility, assumptions/preconceptions, nurses vs doctors, method of debriefing, the learner, hierarchy, safe learning environment, inclusion of all learners, and number of debriefers. These themes were fitted in the four dimensions identified in the literature search, and discussed as so.

Conclusion

Several challenges and strategies were identified during this study. ‘It depends’ was a common answer received in the interviews suggesting that there is very little advice that can be given that applies to every situation. The main recommendation from this study is the support for an interprofessional group of debriefers in IPS although this does introduce its own challenges. Further research is suggested around the hierarchy found in IPS debriefing and how this translates to and from clinical practice.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41077-022-00214-3.

Crisis Management Simulation: The Value of Interdisciplinary Debriefing

OBJECTIVE

Simulation offers an important avenue for surgical and anesthesia training. This is especially important for crisis management scenarios where individuals need to act quickly and efficiently for optimal patient care. Practice based performance can be measured and real time feedback provided during debriefing scenarios.

METHODS

In this paper, we highlight a dual anesthesia and otolaryngology cavernous carotid injury scenario. The trials were run three different times with inter-trial debriefing.

RESULTS

The focused debriefing improved resident performance in terms of blood loss on subsequent trials. Furthermore, the learners provided important feedback regarding the utility of training and how it improved their ability to handle crisis management scenarios in the future.

CONCLUSION

Debriefing for crisis management in a simulation trial improves performance and trainee confidence. Follow up studies will evaluate real world effectiveness over a longer follow up period.

Individual versus collective debriefing after interprofessional training course simulation: The randomised DEBRIEF-SIM trial

INTRODUCTION

Debriefing is a critical phase in simulation-based education that is extremely time-consuming for the instructors. The aim of the study was to assess whether a collective debriefing was non-inferior to an individual debriefing to improve learning outcomes after a simulation session.

METHODS

This randomised controlled multicentre non-inferiority study included pairs comprising one resident and one student nurse in anaesthesia. Each pair underwent two sessions of a simulated life-threatening emergency held at a 6-week interval. Six participant pairs underwent simulation sessions every half-day of training. The debriefing performed after the first session was either individual (1 debriefing by pair; individual group) or collective (1 debriefing by 6 pairs; collective group). The primary outcome was the evolution of a 34-parameter technical skill score (Delta-TSS-34) between the two simulation sessions. The non-inferiority margin was 5. The change in the Anaesthetists' Non-Technical Skills score (Delta-ANTS), and the debriefing duration per participant pair were secondary endpoint measures.

RESULTS

Respectively 23 and 21 pairs were included in the collective and individual groups. Delta-TSS-34 was non-inferior in the collective group compared to the individual group (mean intergroup difference [95% confidence interval]: 2.71 [0.44-4.98]). Delta-ANTS did not significantly differ between the two groups (median [interquartile range]: 22 [10-37] versus 25 [17-35], p = 0.57; respectively in the collective and individual groups). The debriefing duration per participant pair was significantly lower in the collective group (10 [10-11] min versus 27 [25-28] min; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Collective debriefing was non-inferior to individual debriefing to improve learning outcomes after simulation of medical emergencies and allows a significant reduction in the time dedicated to the debriefing.

Comprehensive Literature Search to Identify Assessment Tools for Operating Room Nontechnical Skills to Determine Common Critical Components

BACKGROUND

Effective use of nontechnical skills (NTS) contributes to the provision of safe, quality care in the fast-paced, dynamic setting of the operating room (OR). Inter-professional education of NTS to OR team members can improve performance. Such training requires the accurate measurement of NTS in order to identify gaps in their utilization by OR teams. Although several instruments for measuring OR NTS exist in the literature, each tool tends to define specific NTS differently.

AIM

We aimed to determine commonalities in defined measurements among existing OR NTS tools.

METHODS

We undertook a comprehensive literature review of assessment tools for OR NTS to determine the critical components common to these instruments. A PubMed search of the literature from May 2009 to May 2019 combined various combinations of keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) related to the following subjects: teamwork, teams, assessment, debriefing, surgery, operating room, nontechnical, communication. From this start, articles were selected describing specific instruments. Three reviewers then identified the common components measured among these assessment tools. Reviewers collated kin constructs within each instrument using frequency counts of similarly termed and conceptualized components.

RESULTS

The initial PubMed search produced 119 articles of which 24 articles satisfied the inclusion criteria. Within these articles, 10 assessment tools evaluated OR NTS. Kin constructs were grouped into six NTS categories in the following decreasing frequency order: communication, situation awareness, teamwork, leadership, decision making, and task management/decision making (equal).

CONCLUSION

NTS OR assessment tools in the literature have a variety of kin constructs related to the specific measured components within the instruments. Such kin constructs contain thematic cohesion across six primary NTS groupings with some variation in scale and scope. Future plans include using this information to develop an easy-to-use assessment tool to assist with debriefing in the clinical environment.

Student Perspectives of Interprofessional Group Debriefing: Use of the National League for Nursing Guide for Teaching Thinking

ABSTRACT

This innovative pilot study used the Critical conversations: The NLN Guide for Teaching Thinking monograph to promote critical conversation during debriefing in an interprofessional education group setting following a disaster preparedness simulation. Interprofessional health care students (n = 120) participated in the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare survey as well as four focus groups to understand student perspectives related to the Context, Content, and Course format used to cocreate meaning related to the simulation experience. Findings revealed that use of this method promoted critical dialogue underscored by self-efficacy, critical reflection, safety, group size, and interdisciplinary learning.

Resuscitation Education Science: Educational Strategies to Improve Outcomes From Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

The formula for survival in resuscitation describes educational efficiency and local implementation as key determinants in survival after cardiac arrest. Current educational offerings in the form of standardized online and face-to-face courses are falling short, with providers demonstrating a decay of skills over time. This translates to suboptimal clinical care and poor survival outcomes from cardiac arrest. In many institutions, guidelines taught in courses are not thoughtfully implemented in the clinical environment. A current synthesis of the evidence supporting best educational and knowledge translation strategies in resuscitation is lacking. In this American Heart Association scientific statement, we provide a review of the literature describing key elements of educational efficiency and local implementation, including mastery learning and deliberate practice, spaced practice, contextual learning, feedback and debriefing, assessment, innovative educational strategies, faculty development, and knowledge translation and implementation. For each topic, we provide suggestions for improving provider performance that may ultimately optimize patient outcomes from cardiac arrest.

Crisis Management Simulation: Establishing a Dual Neurosurgery and Anesthesia Training Experience

BACKGROUND

Simulation training has been shown to be an effective teaching tool. Learner management of an intraoperative crisis such as a major cerebrovascular bleed requires effective teamwork, communication, and implementation of key skill sets at appropriate time points. This study establishes a first of a kind simulation experience in a neurosurgery/anesthesia resident (learners) team working together to manage an intraoperative crisis.

METHODS

Using a cadaveric cavernous carotid injury perfusion model, 7 neurosurgery and 6 anesthesia learners, were trained on appropriate vascular injury management using an endonasal endoscopic technique. Learners were evaluated on communication skills, crisis management algorithms, and implementation of appropriate skill sets at the right time. A preanatomic and postanatomic examination and postsimulation survey was administered to neurosurgery learners. Anesthesia learners provided posttraining evaluation through a tailored realism and teaching survey.

RESULTS

Neurosurgery learners' anatomic examination score improved from presimulation (33.89%) to postsimulation (86.11%). No significant difference between learner specialties was observed for situation awareness, decision making, communications and teamwork, or leadership evaluations. Learners reported the simulation realistic, beneficial, and highly instructive.

CONCLUSIONS

Realistic, first of kind, clinical simulation scenarios were presented to a neurosurgery/anesthesia resident team who worked together to manage an intraoperative crisis. Learners were effectively trained on crisis management, the importance of communication, and how to develop algorithms for future implementation in difficult scenarios. Learners were highly satisfied with the simulation training experience and requested that it be integrated more consistently into their residency training programs.