EORTC Group Phase II Study of Oral Etoposide for Pretreated Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Regional hyperthermia for soft tissue sarcoma - a survey on current practice, controversies and consensus among 12 European centers

PURPOSE

To analyze the current practice of regional hyperthermia (RHT) for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at 12 European centers to provide an overview, find consensuses and identify controversies necessary for future guidelines and clinical trials.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional survey study, a 27-item questionnaire assessing clinical subjects and procedural details on RHT for STS was distributed to 12 European cancer centers for RHT.

RESULTS

We have identified seven controversies and five consensus points. Of 12 centers, 6 offer both, RHT with chemotherapy (CTX) or with radiotherapy (RT). Two centers only offer RHT with CTX and four centers only offer RHT with RT. All 12 centers apply RHT for localized, high-risk STS of the extremities, trunk wall and retroperitoneum. However, eight centers also use RHT in metastatic STS, five in palliative STS, eight for superficial STS and six for low-grade STS. Pretherapeutic imaging for RHT treatment planning is used by 10 centers, 9 centers set 40-43 °C as the intratumoral target temperature, and all centers use skin detectors or probes in body orifices for thermometry.

DISCUSSION

There is disagreement regarding the integration of RHT in contemporary interdisciplinary care of STS patients. Many clinical controversies exist that require a standardized consensus guideline and innovative study ideas. At the same time, our data has shown that existing guidelines and decades of experience with the technique of RHT have mostly standardized procedural aspects.

CONCLUSIONS

The provided results may serve as a basis for future guidelines and inform future clinical trials for RHT in STS patients.

Chemotherapeutic drugs for soft tissue sarcomas: a review

Despite the low incidence of soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), hundreds of thousands of new STS cases are diagnosed annually worldwide, and approximately half of them eventually progress to advanced stages. Currently, chemotherapy is the first-line treatment for advanced STSs. There are difficulties in selecting appropriate drugs for multiline chemotherapy, or for combination treatment of different STS histological subtypes. In this study, we first comprehensively reviewed the efficacy of various chemotherapeutic drugs in the treatment of STSs, and then described the current status of sensitive drugs for different STS subtypes. anthracyclines are the most important systemic treatment for advanced STSs. Ifosfamide, trabectedin, gemcitabine, taxanes, dacarbazine, and eribulin exhibit certain activities in STSs. Vinca alkaloid agents (vindesine, vinblastine, vinorelbine, vincristine) have important therapeutic effects in specific STS subtypes, such as rhabdomyosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma family tumors, whereas their activity in other subtypes is weak. Other chemotherapeutic drugs (methotrexate, cisplatin, etoposide, pemetrexed) have weak efficacy in STSs and are rarely used. It is necessary to select specific second- or above-line chemotherapeutic drugs depending on the histological subtype. This review aims to provide a reference for the selection of chemotherapeutic drugs for multi-line therapy for patients with advanced STSs who have an increasingly long survival.

Histology-driven chemotherapy of soft-tissue sarcoma

Soft-tissue sarcomas are rare diseases with >50 subtypes. Surgery is the most important treatment in localized disease, sometimes combined with radiotherapy. Chemotherapy is used as palliation in advanced disease, sometimes also with a potential to decrease tumour size and eradicate micro-metastases, making meaningful surgery possible. The role of chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment in localized disease is not finally settled. Doxorubicin and ifosfamide are the two drugs with the best established response rates in soft-tissue sarcoma, and a combination of these drugs has been a 'gold standard' for several years. However, there is an emerging knowledge of the biology and sensitivity to treatment for different histological subtypes. New drugs such as gemcitabine, taxanes and trabectedin have been explored in several studies, showing promising results. Even if most studies have encompassed many different subtypes and were limited in size, knowledge related to specific treatment for different subtypes is emerging. Examples are trabectedin in lyposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma, and taxanes in angiosarcoma.

Of mice and men: opportunities to use genetically engineered mouse models of synovial sarcoma for preclinical cancer therapeutic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Synovial sarcoma is a soft tissue malignancy with a predilection for adolescents and young adults. Despite recent improvements in the understanding of its character and etiology, few therapeutic advances have been made. The mortality rate is high among the young population it affects. The low incidence of most subtypes of sarcoma, such as synovial sarcoma, makes disease-specific trials difficult to organize. The biological differences between sarcoma subtypes make inclusion of multiple types in general trials unsatisfactory as well.

METHODS

A review of the literature regarding targetable pathways in synovial sarcoma was undertaken. A strategy has been devised to utilize available technologies in order to prioritize drug trial planning.

RESULTS

Cell culture and xenograft research with synovial sarcoma cell lines have identified some critical pathways that may be targetable. Promising therapeutic strategies include newer cytotoxic chemotherapies, antiangiogenic agents, anti-IGF1R pathway agents, anti-Bcl-2/proapoptotic agents, and histone deacetylase complex inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose to prioritize potential therapeutic strategies via preclinical testing of agents in a genetic mouse model of synovial sarcoma. Preclinical optimization of treatment regimens can guide the development of more focused patient trials.

A Phase I/II Study of a 72-h Continuous Infusion of Etoposide in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Purpose. The study was performed to assess the antitumour activity and toxicity of a 72-h continuous infusion of single-agent etoposide as second-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS), following reports of substantial activity using this schedule of etoposide administration as first-line treatment in combination with ifosfamide.Patients/method. This was an open phase I/II trial performed at a single institution in patients with metastatic or locally advanced STS who had failed first-line treatment with doxorubicin + ifosfamide combination chemotherapy or, less commonly, single-agent treatment with doxorubicin or ifosfamide. Etoposide was given as a continuous intravenous infusion over 72 h. The starting dose level was 200 mg m(-2) day(-1) x 3 escalating in 10% steps in cohorts of three patients until dose-limiting toxicity was encountered.Results. Seventeen patients were treated, median age 47 years (range 26-71 years). No responses were seen in 16 assessable patients despite etoposide levels in the cotoxic range. The steady-state plasma concentration exceeded 8 mug ml-(1) in all patients and in patients treated at >/= 600 mg m -(2) the mean steady-state level was 14.4 mug ml -(1). The median event-free survival was 6 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.31-8.69) and the overall survival 16 weeks (95% CI 9.28-22.72). The maximum tolerated dose in this pretreated patient group was 200 mg mm(-2) day(-1) x 3. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression.Discussion. Etoposide given by 72-h infusion is inactive as second-line chemotherapy in STS. It is associated with significant toxicity when given in these doses, in this patient group.

Trabectedin in the treatment of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: cost-effectiveness, cost-utility and value of information

Background: To assess the cost-effectiveness of trabectedin compared with end-stage treatment (EST) after failure with anthracycline and/or ifosfamide in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (mSTS).

Design: Analysis was carried out using a probabilistic Markov model with trabectedin → EST and EST arms, three health states (stable disease, progressive disease and death) and a lifetime perspective (3% annual discount rate). Finnish resources (drugs, mSTS, adverse events and travelling) and costs (year 2008) were used. Efficacy was based on an indirect comparison of the STS-201 and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer trials. QLQ-C30 scale scores were mapped to 15D, Short Form 6D and EuroQol 5D utilities. The outcome measures were the cost-effectiveness acceptability frontier, incremental cost per life year gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and the expected value of perfect information (EVPI).

Results: Trabectedin → EST was associated with 14.0 (95% confidence interval 9.1–19.2) months longer survival, €36 778 higher costs (€32 816 using hospital price for trabectedin) and €31 590 (€28 192) incremental cost per LYG with an EVPI of €3008 (€3188) compared with EST. With a threshold of €50 000 per LYG, trabectedin → EST had 98.5% (98.2%) probability of being cost-effective. The incremental cost per QALY gained with trabectedin → EST was €42 633–47 735 (€37 992–42 819) compared with EST. The results were relatively insensitive to changes.

Conclusion: Trabectedin is a potentially cost-effective treatment of mSTS patients.

Efficacy and safety of trabectedin in patients with advanced or metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma after failure of prior anthracyclines and ifosfamide: results of a randomized phase II study of two different schedules

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of trabectedin in a phase II, open-label, multicenter, randomized study in adult patients with unresectable/metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma after failure of prior conventional chemotherapy including anthracyclines and ifosfamide.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to one of two trabectedin regimens (via central venous access): 1.5 mg/m(2) 24-hour intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks (q3 weeks 24-hour) versus 0.58 mg/m(2) 3-hour IV infusion every week for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle (qwk 3-hour). Time to progression (TTP) was the primary efficacy end point, based on confirmed independent review of images.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy patients were randomly assigned; 136 (q3 weeks 24-hour) versus 134 (qwk 3-hour). Median TTP was 3.7 months versus 2.3 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.734; 95% CI, 0.554 to 0.974; P = .0302), favoring the q3 weeks 24-hour arm. Median progression-free survival was 3.3 months versus 2.3 months (HR, 0.755; 95% CI, 0.574 to 0.992; P = .0418). Median overall survival (n = 235 events) was 13.9 months versus 11.8 months (HR, 0.843; 95% CI, 0.653 to 1.090; P = .1920). Although somewhat more neutropenia, elevations in AST/ALT, emesis, and fatigue occurred in the q3 weeks 24-hour, this regimen was reasonably well tolerated. Febrile neutropenia was rare (0.8%). No cumulative toxicities were noted.

CONCLUSION

Prior studies showed clinical benefit with trabectedin in patients with sarcomas after failure of standard chemotherapy. This trial documents superior disease control with the q3 weeks 24-hour trabectedin regimen in liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas, although the qwk 3-hour regimen also demonstrated activity relative to historical comparisons. Trabectedin may now be considered an important new option to control advanced sarcomas in patients after failure of available standard-of-care therapies.

Progression-free rate as the principal end-point for phase II trials in soft-tissue sarcomas

We have estimated progression-free rates (PFR) for various groups of soft-tissue sarcoma patients from our clinical trials database, to provide reference values for conducting phase II studies with PFR as the principal end-point. In 146 pretreated patients receiving an active agent, the PFR estimates were 39 and 14% at 3 and 6 months; with inactive regimens (234 patients), those estimates were 21 and 8% respectively. In 1154-non-pretreated patients, PFR estimates varied from 77% (synovial sarcoma) to 57% (malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH)) at 3 months, and from 56% (synovial sarcoma) to 38% (MFH) at 6 months. In 61 leiomyosarcomas from gastrointestinal origin, the corresponding figures were 44 and 30%, respectively. Consequently, for first-line therapy, a 6-month PFR of > or = 30-56% (depending on histology) can be considered as a reference value to suggest drug activity; for second-line therapy, a 3-month PFR of > or = 40% would suggest a drug activity, and < or = 20% would suggest inactivity.

The treatment of distant metastases in soft tissue sarcoma

This article reviews the current standard approaches to the treatment of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and evaluates new chemotherapy agents and novel approaches. A computerized search strategy was used to identify articles examining the role of chemotherapy and surgery in metastatic STS, which were published between January 1992 and December 1998. This search was supplemented by key articles from our files published before 1992. In selecting articles for inclusion in this review, emphasis was placed on randomized data and novel approaches. Only three agents-doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and dacarbazine-have shown significant activity in metastatic STS. Numerous studies have examined the efficacy and toxicity of combining the known active agents in standard doses or in high doses with cytokine support. Promising results, in terms of increased response rates, often have not been reproduced in randomized trials, and there is no convincing evidence of enhanced overall survival. New regimens should be evaluated in randomized trials incorporating quality-of-life endpoints. High-dose chemotherapy with bone marrow/stem cell rescue remains an investigational procedure of uncertain efficacy. Pilot studies have established the feasibility of intraperitoneal chemotherapy, after cytoreductive surgery, in patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis. To date, the efficacy of this approach has not been validated in phase II or III trials. The role of surgery in the treatment of isolated pulmonary metastases is well established. Results of small series raise the possibility that resection of hepatic metastases is beneficial in selected patients. Current chemotherapy options for patients with STS are limited. There is reason to hope that the situation will change with the further development of new agents that have novel and specific mechanisms of action.