1
|
Wyman D, Butler LT, Morgan-Trimmer S, Bright P, Barber J, Budgett J, Walters K, Lang I, Rapaport P, Banks S, Palomo M, Orgeta V, Livingston G, Rockwood K, Lord K, Manthorpe J, Dow B, Hoe J, Cooper C. Process evaluation of a New psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for Independence in Dementia (NIDUS-Family). Age Ageing 2024; 53:afae181. [PMID: 39171389 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We report a mixed-methods process evaluation embedded within a randomised controlled trial. We aimed to test and refine a theory of change model hypothesising key causal assumptions to understand how the New Interventions for Independence in Dementia Study (NIDUS)-Family (a manualised, multimodal psychosocial intervention), was effective relative to usual care, on the primary outcome of Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) over 1 year. METHODS In 2021-2022, intervention-arm dyads completed an acceptability questionnaire developed to test causal assumptions. We conducted qualitative interviews with dyads and intervention facilitators, purposively selected for diverse follow-up GAS scores. We collected observational data from intervention session recordings. We thematically analysed data, then integrated qualitative and quantitative data. RESULTS 174/204 (85.3%) dyads allocated to NIDUS-Family, fully completed it, 18 partially completed, while 12 received no intervention. We interviewed 27/192 (14%) of dyads receiving any sessions, and 9/10 facilitators; and observed 12 sessions. 47/192 (24.5%) of carers completed the acceptability questionnaire. We identified four themes: (A) 'Someone to talk to helps dyads feel supported'; (B) 'NIDUS-Family helps carers change their perspective'; (C) 'Personalisation helps people living with dementia maintain their identity' and (D) 'Small steps help dyads move forward'. CONCLUSION Key causal pathway mechanisms were: a respectful, trusting and impartial relationship with the facilitator: supporting the development of meaningful goals and support to find manageable solutions. Core implementation factors were delivery of the modules from a consistent facilitator across regular sessions. Core contextual factors influencing these mechanisms were dyadic participation and understanding of abilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Wyman
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, School of Psychology and Sport Science at Anglia Ruskin University, Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK
| | - Laurie T Butler
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, School of Psychology and Sport Science at Anglia Ruskin University, Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK
| | | | - Peter Bright
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, School of Psychology and Sport Science at Anglia Ruskin University, Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK
| | - Julie Barber
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Wing B, Floor 6 Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, UK
| | - Jessica Budgett
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Yvonne Carter Building, Turner Street, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Kate Walters
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Wing B, Floor 6 Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, UK
| | - Iain Lang
- University of Exeter, The Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Penny Rapaport
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Yvonne Carter Building, Turner Street, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Sara Banks
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Yvonne Carter Building, Turner Street, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Marina Palomo
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Clinical Psychology, St. Pancras Hospital, 4 St. Pancras Way, London, NW1 0PE, UK
| | - Vasiliki Orgeta
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Wing B, Floor 6 Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, UK
| | - Gill Livingston
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Wing B, Floor 6 Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, UK
| | - Kenneth Rockwood
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Health Administration, Dalhousie University, Suite 1421-5955 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Kathryn Lord
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD7 1DP, UK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- Social Care Workforce Research Unit, Faculty of Social Science and Public Policy, King's College London, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NN, UK
| | - Briony Dow
- National Ageing Research Institute Ltd, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Juanita Hoe
- Gellar Institute of Ageing and Memory, School of Medicine, University of West London, London W5 5RF, UK
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Yvonne Carter Building, Turner Street, London E1 2AB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dar A, Budgett J, Zabihi S, Whitfield E, Lang I, Rapaport P, Heath B, Ogden M, Phillips R, Burton A, Butler L, Wyman D, Hoe J, Manthorpe J, Morgan-Trimmer S, Koutsoubelis F, Cooper C. Pre-implementation planning for a new personalised, dementia post-diagnostic support intervention: exploring the perspective of professional stakeholders. BJPsych Open 2024; 10:e139. [PMID: 39103976 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2024.733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Only a third of people with dementia receive a diagnosis and post-diagnostic support. An eight session, manualised, modular post-diagnostic support system (New Interventions for Independence in Dementia Study (NIDUS) - family), delivered remotely by non-clinical facilitators is the first scalable intervention to improve personalised goal attainment for people with dementia. It could significantly improve care quality. AIMS We aimed to explore system readiness for NIDUS-family, a scalable, personalised post-diagnostic support intervention. METHOD We conducted semi-structured interviews with professionals from dementia care services; the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided interviews and their thematic analysis. RESULTS From 2022 to 2023, we interviewed a purposive sample of 21 professionals from seven English National Health Service, health and social care services. We identified three themes: (1) potential value of a personalised intervention - interviewees perceived the capacity for choice and supporting person-centred care as relative advantages over existing resources; (2) compatibility and deliverability with existing systems - the NIDUS-family intervention model was perceived as compatible with service goals and clients' needs, but current service infrastructures, financing and commissioning briefs constraining resources to those at greatest need were seen as barriers to providing universal, post-diagnostic care; (3) fit with current workforce skills - the intervention model aligned well with staff development plans; delivery by non-clinically qualified staff was considered an advantage over current care options. CONCLUSIONS Translating evidence for scalable and effective post-diagnostic care into practice will support national policies to widen access to support and upskill support workers, but requires a greater focus on prevention in commissioning briefs and resource planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayesha Dar
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jessica Budgett
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - Sedigheh Zabihi
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - Ellenyd Whitfield
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | | | - Penny Rapaport
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jill Manthorpe
- The Policy Institute at King's, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Claudia Cooper
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cooper C, Zabihi S, Akhtar A, Lee T, Isaaq A, Le Novere M, Barber J, Lord K, Rapaport P, Banks S, Duggan S, Ogden M, Walters K, Orgeta V, Rockwood K, Butler LT, Manthorpe J, Dow B, Hoe J, Hunter R, Banerjee S, Budgett J, Duffy L. Feasibility and acceptability of NIDUS-professional, a training and support intervention for homecare workers caring for clients living with dementia: a cluster-randomised feasibility trial. Age Ageing 2024; 53:afae074. [PMID: 38643354 PMCID: PMC11032424 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the first randomised controlled trial of a dementia training and support intervention in UK homecare agencies, we aimed to assess: acceptability of our co-designed, manualised training, delivered by non-clinical facilitators; outcome completion feasibility; and costs for a future trial. METHODS This cluster-randomised (2:1) single-blind, feasibility trial involved English homecare agencies. Intervention arm agency staff were offered group videocall sessions: 6 over 3 months, then monthly for 3 months (NIDUS-professional). Family carers (henceforth carers) and clients with dementia (dyads) were offered six to eight complementary, individual intervention sessions (NIDUS-Family). We collected potential trial measures as secondary outcomes remotely at baseline and 6 months: HCW (homecare worker) Work-related Strain Inventory (WRSI), Sense of Competence (SoC); proxy-rated Quality of Life (QOL), Disability Assessment for Dementia scale (DAD), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and Homecare Satisfaction (HCS). RESULTS From December 2021 to September 2022, we met agency (4 intervention, 2 control) and HCWs (n = 62) recruitment targets and recruited 16 carers and 16/60 planned clients. We met a priori progression criteria for adherence (≥4/6 sessions: 29/44 [65.9%,95% confidence interval (CI): 50.1,79.5]), HCW or carer proxy-outcome completion (15/16 (93.8% [69.8,99.8]) and proceeding with adaptation for HCWs outcome completion (46/63 (73.0% [CI: 60.3,83.4]). Delivery of NIDUS-Professional costs was £6,423 (£137 per eligible client). WRSI scores decreased and SoC increased at follow-up, with no significant between-group differences. For intervention arm proxy-rated outcomes, carer-rated QOL increased, HCW-rated was unchanged; carer and HCW-rated NPI decreased; DAD decreased (greater disability) and HCS was unchanged. CONCLUSION A pragmatic trial is warranted; we will consider using aggregated, agency-level client outcomes, including neuropsychiatric symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Cooper
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Sedigheh Zabihi
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Amirah Akhtar
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Teresa Lee
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Abdinasir Isaaq
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Marie Le Novere
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Julie Barber
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Kathryn Lord
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Penny Rapaport
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Sara Banks
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Sandra Duggan
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Margaret Ogden
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Kate Walters
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Vasiliki Orgeta
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Kenneth Rockwood
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Laurie T Butler
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Briony Dow
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Juanita Hoe
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Sube Banerjee
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Jessica Budgett
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Larisa Duffy
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cooper C, Vickerstaff V, Barber J, Phillips R, Ogden M, Walters K, Lang I, Rapaport P, Orgeta V, Rockwood K, Banks S, Palomo M, Butler LT, Lord K, Livingston G, Banerjee S, Manthorpe J, Dow B, Hoe J, Hunter R, Samus Q, Budgett J. A psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for independence in dementia (NIDUS-Family) versus goal setting and routine care: a single-masked, phase 3, superiority, randomised controlled trial. THE LANCET. HEALTHY LONGEVITY 2024; 5:e141-e151. [PMID: 38310894 PMCID: PMC10834374 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(23)00262-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although national guidelines recommend that everyone with dementia receives personalised post-diagnostic support, few do. Unlike previous interventions that improved personalised outcomes in people with dementia, the NIDUS-Family intervention is fully manualised and deliverable by trained and supervised, non-clinical facilitators. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of home-based goal setting plus NIDUS-Family in supporting the attainment of personalised goals set by people with dementia and their carers. METHODS We did a two-arm, single-masked, multi-site, randomised, clinical trial recruiting patient-carer dyads from community settings. We randomly assigned dyads to either home-based goal setting plus NIDUS-Family or goal setting and routine care (control). Randomisation was blocked and stratified by site (2:1; intervention to control), with allocations assigned via a remote web-based system. NIDUS-Family is tailored to goals set by dyads by selecting modules involving behavioural interventions, carer support, psychoeducation, communication and coping skills, enablement, and environmental adaptations. The intervention involved six to eight video-call or telephone sessions (or in person when COVID-19-related restrictions allowed) over 6 months, then telephone follow-ups every 2-3 months for 6 months. The primary outcome was carer-rated goal attainment scaling (GAS) score at 12 months. Analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN11425138. FINDINGS Between April 30, 2020, and May 9, 2021, we assessed 1083 potential dyads for eligibility, 781 (72·1%) of whom were excluded. Of 302 eligible dyads, we randomly assigned 98 (32·4%) to the control group and 204 (67·5%) to the intervention group. The mean age of participants with dementia was 79·9 years (SD 8·2), 169 (56%) were women, and 133 (44%) were men. 247 (82%) dyads completed the primary outcome, which favoured the intervention (mean GAS score at 12 months 58·7 [SD 13·0; n=163] vs 49·0 [14·1; n=84]; adjusted difference in means 10·23 [95% CI 5·75-14·71]; p<0·001). 31 (15·2%) participants in the intervention group and 14 (14·3%) in the control group experienced serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION To our knowledge, NIDUS-Family is the first readily scalable intervention for people with dementia and their family carers that improves attainment of personalised goals. We therefore recommend that it be implemented in health and care services. FUNDING UK Alzheimer's Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Cooper
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
| | - Victoria Vickerstaff
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Julie Barber
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Margaret Ogden
- Research Network Volunteer, Alzheimer's Society, London, UK
| | - Kate Walters
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Iain Lang
- St Luke's Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Penny Rapaport
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Vasiliki Orgeta
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kenneth Rockwood
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Sara Banks
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - Marina Palomo
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Laurie T Butler
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK
| | - Kathyrn Lord
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Gill Livingston
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sube Banerjee
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- The Policy Institute at King's, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Briony Dow
- National Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Juanita Hoe
- Geller Institute of Ageing and Memory, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of West London, London, UK
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Quincy Samus
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jessica Budgett
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Budgett J. Setting individualised goals for people living with dementia and their family carers: A systematic review of goal-setting outcome measures and their psychometric properties. DEMENTIA 2024; 23:312-340. [PMID: 38105445 PMCID: PMC10807246 DOI: 10.1177/14713012231222309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individualised goal-setting outcome measures can be a useful way of reflecting people living with dementia and family carers' differing priorities regarding quality-of-life domains in the highly heterogeneous symptomatology of the disease. Evaluating goal-setting measures is challenging, and there is limited evidence for their psychometric properties. AIM (1) To describe what goal-setting outcomes have been used in this population; (2) To evaluate their validity, reliability, and feasibility in RCTs. METHOD We systematically reviewed studies that utilised goal-setting outcome measures for people living dementia or their family carers. We adapted a risk of bias and quality rating system based on the COSMIN guidelines to evaluate the measurement properties of outcomes when used within RCTs. RESULTS Thirty studies meeting inclusion criteria used four different goal-setting outcome measures: Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS), Bangor Goal Setting Interview (BGSI), Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and Individually Prioritized Problems Assessment (IPPA); other papers have reported study-specific goal-setting attainment systems. Only GAS has been used as an outcome over periods greater than 9 months (up to a year). Within RCTs there was moderate quality evidence for sufficient content validity and construct validity for GAS, COPM and the BGSI. Reliability was only assessed in one RCT (using BGSI); in which two raters reviewed interview transcripts to rate goals with excellent inter-rater reliability. Feasibility was reported as good across the measures with a low level of missing data. CONCLUSION We found moderate quality evidence for good content and construct validity and feasibility of GAS, BGSI and COPM. While more evidence of reliability of these measures is needed, we recommend that future trials consider using individualised goal setting measures, to report the effect of interventions on outcomes that are most meaningful to people living with dementia and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Budgett
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, and Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfsen Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Renouf P, Budgett J, Wyman D, Banks S, Poppe M, Cooper C. Non-clinically trained facilitators' experiences of remote psychosocial interventions for older adults with memory loss and their family carers. BJPsych Open 2023; 9:e174. [PMID: 37791537 PMCID: PMC10594201 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2023.558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dementia is the seventh leading cause of global mortality, with cases increasing. Psychosocial interventions might help prevent dementia and improve quality of life. Although it is cost-effective for non-clinically trained staff to deliver these, concerns are raised and little is known about the resulting impact on staff, especially for remote interventions. AIMS To explore how non-clinically trained facilitators experienced delivering remote, one-to-one and group-based psychosocial interventions with older adults with memory loss and their family carers, under training and supervision. METHOD We conducted a secondary thematic analysis of interviews with non-clinically trained facilitators, employed by universities, the National Health Service and third-sector organisations, who facilitated either of two manualised interventions: the APPLE-Tree group dementia prevention for people with mild memory loss or the NIDUS-Family one-to-one dyadic intervention for people living with dementia and their family carers. RESULTS The overarching theme of building confidence in developing therapeutic relationships was explained with subthemes that described the roles of positioning expertise (subtheme 1), developing clinical skills (subtheme 2), peer support (subtheme 3) in enabling this process and remote delivery as a potential barrier to it (subtheme 4). CONCLUSIONS Non-clinically trained facilitators can have positive experiences delivering remote psychosocial interventions with older adults. Differences in life experience could compound initial fears of being 'in at the deep end' and 'exposed' as lacking expertise. Fears were allayed by experiencing positive therapeutic relationships and outcomes, and by growing confidence. For this to happen, appropriate training and supervision is needed, alongside accounting for the challenges of remote delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippa Renouf
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK; and Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Jessica Budgett
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK; and Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Danielle Wyman
- School of Psychology and Sport Science, Anglia Ruskin University, UK
| | - Sara Banks
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Michaela Poppe
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK; and Memory Services, East London NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK; and Memory Services, East London NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zabihi S, Duffy L, Kelleher D, Lord K, Dar A, Koutsoubelis F, Banks S, Rapaport P, Mason C, Vickerstaff V, Barber JA, Manthorpe J, Walters K, Lang I, Rockwood K, Duggan S, Kales H, Cooper C. Feasibility and acceptability of NIDUS-Professional, a training and support intervention for homecare workers caring for clients living with dementia: a cluster-randomised feasibility trial protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e066166. [PMID: 36572489 PMCID: PMC9806004 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Most people living with dementia want to remain living in their own homes, and are supported to do so by family carers and homecare workers. There are concerns that homecare is often unable to meet the needs of this client group, with limited evidence regarding effective interventions to improve it for people living with dementia. We have developed a training and support programme for homecare workers (NIDUS-Professional) to be delivered alongside support sessions for people living with dementia and their family carers (NIDUS-Family). We aim to assess (1) its acceptability among homecare workers and employing agencies, and (2) the feasibility of homecare workers, people living with dementia and their family carers completing the outcomes of intervention in a future randomised controlled trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a cluster-randomised (2:1) single-blind, multisite feasibility trial. We aim to recruit 60-90 homecare workers, 30-60 clients living with dementia and their family carers through 6-9 English homecare agencies. In the intervention arm, homecare staff will be offered six group sessions on video call over three months, followed by monthly group sessions over the subsequent three-month period. Outcome measures will be collected at baseline and at six months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study received ethical approval on 7 January 2020 from the Camden & King's Cross Research Ethics Committee. Study reference: 19/LO/1667. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal, conference presentation and blog to research and clinical audiences; we will attend forums to present findings to participating homecare agencies and their clients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN15757555.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sedigheh Zabihi
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Larisa Duffy
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Kelleher
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Kathryn Lord
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Ayesha Dar
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Sara Banks
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Penny Rapaport
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Clare Mason
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Victoria Vickerstaff
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Julie A Barber
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Kate Walters
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Iain Lang
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Kenneth Rockwood
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | | - Helen Kales
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, UC Davis Health, University of California, Davis, California, USA
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kelleher D, Lord K, Duffy L, Rapaport P, Barber J, Manthorpe J, Leverton M, Dow B, Budgett J, Banks S, Duggan S, Cooper C. Time to reflect is a rare and valued opportunity; a pilot of the NIDUS-professional dementia training intervention for homecare workers during the Covid-19 pandemic. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e2928-e2939. [PMID: 35128740 PMCID: PMC9111618 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Most people living with dementia want to continue living in their own home for as long as possible and many rely on support from homecare services to do so. There are concerns that homecare often fails to meet the needs of clients with dementia, but there is limited evidence regarding effective interventions to improve its delivery for this client group. We aimed to assess whether a co-designed, 6-session dementia training intervention for homecare workers (NIDUS-professional) was acceptable and feasible. Facilitated training sessions were delivered over 3 months, followed by 3, monthly implementation meetings to embed changes in practice. Two trained and supervised facilitators without clinical qualifications delivered the intervention via group video-calls during Oct 2020-March 2021 to a group of seven homecare workers from one agency in England. Participants provided qualitative feedback 3- and 6-months post intervention. Qualitative interview data and facilitator notes were integrated in a thematic analysis. Adherence to the intervention and fidelity of delivery were high, indicating that it was acceptable and feasible to deliver in practice. Thirty of a possible 42 (71.4%) group sessions were attended. In our thematic analysis we report one over-arching theme: 'Having time and space to reflect is a rare opportunity'. Within this we identified four subthemes (Having time to reflect is a rare opportunity; Reflecting with peers enhances learning; Reflection and perspective taking can improve care; Recognising skills and building confidence) through which we explored how participants valued the intervention to discuss their work and learn new skills. Attendance was lower for the implementation sessions, perhaps reflecting participants' lack of clarity about their purpose. We used our findings to consider how we can maintain positive impacts of the manualised sessions, so that these are translated into tangible, scalable benefits for people living with dementia and the homecare workforce. A randomised feasibility trial is underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Kelleher
- Centre for Applied Dementia StudiesUniversity of BradfordBradfordUK
| | - Kathryn Lord
- Centre for Applied Dementia StudiesUniversity of BradfordBradfordUK
| | - Larisa Duffy
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Julie Barber
- Statistical SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- NIHR Policy Research Unit on Health and Social Care WorkforceKing’s College LondonLondonUK
| | - Monica Leverton
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- NIHR Policy Research Unit on Health and Social Care WorkforceKing’s College LondonLondonUK
| | - Briony Dow
- National Ageing Research InstituteUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| | | | - Sara Banks
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Claudia Cooper
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Watt
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto
| | - Wade Thompson
- Women's College Research Institute, Toronto
- Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Deborah Brown
- Lawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto
| | - Barbara Liu
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lord K, Kelleher D, Ogden M, Mason C, Rapaport P, Burton A, Leverton M, Downs M, Souris H, Jackson J, Lang I, Manthorpe J, Cooper C. Co-designing complex interventions with people living with dementia and their supporters. DEMENTIA 2021; 21:426-441. [PMID: 34969312 PMCID: PMC8811333 DOI: 10.1177/14713012211042466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES We engaged people living with dementia, family carers and health and social care professionals in co-designing two dementia care interventions: for family carers and people living with dementia (New Interventions for Independence in Dementia Study (NIDUS)-family and home-care workers (NIDUS-professional training programme). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Over October 2019-March 2020, we invited public and patient (PPI) and professional members of our NIDUS co-design groups to complete the PPI Engagement Evaluation Tool (designed to assess engagement activities), and non-professional PPI members to participate in qualitative telephone interviews. We thematically analysed and integrated mixed-methods findings. RESULTS Most (15/20; 75%) of the PPI members approached participated. We identified four themes: (1) Creating the right atmosphere: participants found group meetings positive and enabling, though one health professional was unsure how to position themselves within them; (2) Participants influencing the outcome: while most members felt that they had some influence, for one carer consultation seemed too late to influence; (3) Having the right information: several carers wanted greater clarity and more regular updates from researchers; (4) Unique challenges for people living with dementia: memory problems presented challenges in engaging with substantial information, and within a large group. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS We reflect on the importance of providing accessible, regular updates, managing power imbalances between co-design group members with lived and professional experiences; and ensuring needs and voices of people living with dementia are prioritised. We encourage future studies to incorporate evaluations of co-design processes into study design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Lord
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, 1905University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Daniel Kelleher
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, 1905University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | | | - Clare Mason
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, 1905University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Penny Rapaport
- Division of Psychiatry, 4919University College London, London, UK
| | - Alexandra Burton
- Division of Psychiatry, 4919University College London, London, UK
| | - Monica Leverton
- Division of Psychiatry, 4919University College London, London, UK
| | - Murna Downs
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, 1905University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Helen Souris
- 53249NHS England and NHS Improvement London, London, UK
| | - Joy Jackson
- 4784Alzheimer's Society Research Network, London, UK
| | - Iain Lang
- 3286University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, 4616King's College London, London, UK
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Division of Psychiatry, 4919University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Burton A, Rapaport P, Palomo M, Lord K, Budgett J, Barber J, Hunter R, Butler L, Vickerstaff V, Rockwood K, Ogden M, Smith D, Lang I, Livingston G, Dow B, Kales H, Manthorpe J, Walters K, Hoe J, Orgeta V, Samus Q, Cooper C. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of a New psychosocial intervention to support Independence in Dementia (NIDUS-family) for family carers and people living with dementia in their own homes: a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:865. [PMID: 34857029 PMCID: PMC8637036 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05851-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most people living with dementia want to remain living in their own homes and are supported to do so by family carers. No interventions have consistently demonstrated improvements to people with dementia's life quality, functioning, or other indices of living as well as possible with dementia. We have co-produced, with health and social care professionals and family carers of people with dementia, a new intervention (NIDUS-family). To our knowledge, NIDUS-family is the first manualised intervention that can be tailored to personal goals of people living with dementia and their families and is delivered by facilitators without clinical training. The intervention utilizes components of behavioural management, carer support, psychoeducation, communication and coping skills training, enablement, and environmental adaptations, with modules selected to address dyads' selected goals. We will evaluate the effect of NIDUS-family and usual care on goal attainment, as measured by Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) rated by family carers, compared to usual care alone at 12-month follow-up. We will also determine whether NIDUS-family and usual care is more cost-effective than usual care alone over 12 months. METHODS A randomised, two-arm, single-masked, multi-site clinical trial involving 297 people living with dementia-family carer dyads. Dyads will be randomised 2:1 to receive the NIDUS-family intervention with usual care (n = 199) or usual care alone (n = 98). The intervention group will be offered, over 1 year, via 6-8 video call or telephone sessions (or face to face if COVID-19 restrictions allow in the recruitment period) in the initial 6 months, followed by telephone follow-ups every 1-2 months to support implementation, with a trained facilitator. DISCUSSION Increasing the time lived at home by people living with dementia is likely to benefit lives now and in the future. Our intervention, which we adapted to include remote delivery prior to trial commencement due to the COVID-19 pandemic, aims to address barriers to living as well and as independently as possible that distress people living with dementia, exacerbate family carer(s) stress, negatively affect relationships, lead to safety risks, and frequently precipitate avoidable moves to a care home. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number ISRCTN11425138 . Registered on 7 October 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Burton
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Penny Rapaport
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marina Palomo
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kathryn Lord
- The Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Jessica Budgett
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Julie Barber
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Laurie Butler
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Victoria Vickerstaff
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kenneth Rockwood
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Margaret Ogden
- Alzheimer's Society Research Network Volunteers, London, UK
| | - Debs Smith
- Alzheimer's Society Research Network Volunteers, London, UK
| | - Iain Lang
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Gill Livingston
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Briony Dow
- National Ageing Research Institute, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Kales
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, UC Davis Health, University of California, California, USA
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Kate Walters
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Juanita Hoe
- Division of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, City University of London, London, UK
| | - Vasiliki Orgeta
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Quincy Samus
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|