1
|
Giebel C, Prato L, Metcalfe S, Barrow H. Barriers to accessing and receiving mental health care for paid and unpaid carers of older adults. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14029. [PMID: 38528675 PMCID: PMC10963885 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the barriers and facilitators to accessing and receiving mental health care for paid and unpaid carers of older adults. METHODS Unpaid and paid carers for older adults in England were interviewed remotely between May and December 2022. Participants were asked about their experiences of mental health needs and support. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. RESULTS Thirty-seven carers participated (npaid = 9; nunpaid = 28), with the majority caring for a parent with dementia. Thematic analysis generated four themes: lack of healthcare support, social care system failing to enable time off, personal barriers and unsupportive work culture. Healthcare professionals failed to provide any link to mental health services, including when a dementia diagnosis was received. Structural and organisational barriers were evidenced by carers being unable to take time off from their unpaid caring duties or paid caring role, due to an absence of social care support for their relative. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to have explored the barriers to mental health care and support for paid and unpaid carers for older adults and suggests that structural, organisational and personal barriers cause severe difficulties in accessing required support to care for older relatives, services users and residents. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Two unpaid carers aided with the development of topic guides, data analysis, interpretation and dissemination. Both were supported and trained to code anonymised transcripts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarissa Giebel
- Department of Primary Care and Mental HealthUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West CoastLiverpoolUK
| | - Laura Prato
- Department of Primary Care and Mental HealthUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West CoastLiverpoolUK
| | - Sue Metcalfe
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West CoastLiverpoolUK
| | - Hazel Barrow
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West CoastLiverpoolUK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barbosa A, Ferreira AR, Smits C, Hegerath FM, Vollmar HC, Fernandes L, Craven MP, Innes A, Casey D, Sezgin D, Hopper L, Øksnebjerg L. Use and uptake of technology by people with dementia and their supporters during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aging Ment Health 2024; 28:83-94. [PMID: 36650751 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2163375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This rapid review aims to identify the types of technologies used by people with dementia and their supporters during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the issues which influenced technology adoption within their usual care routines. METHODS PubMed, PsychInfo, Scopus, and Cochrane COVID reviews were searched to identify peer-review studies published since 2020. A total of 18 studies were included and synthesised thematically. RESULTS Of these, most were conducted in the community (n = 15) with people with dementia only (n = 11) and involved qualitative methods (n = 11). The majority (n = 12) focused on digital off-the-shelf and low-cost solutions, such as free video conferencing platforms, to access care, socialise or take part in interventions. Whilst often well-accepted and associated with positive outcomes (such as improved social connectedness), lack of digital literacy or support to use technologies, limited access to appropriate technology, individuals' physical, cognitive, or sensory difficulties, were highlighted and likely to threaten the adoption of these solutions. The quality of the evidence was mixed, neither very robust nor easily generalisable which may be attributed to the challenges of conducting research during the pandemic or the need to rapidly adapt to a new reality. CONCLUSION While COVID-19 has fast-tracked the adoption of technology, its use is likely to continue beyond the pandemic. We need to ensure this technology can leverage dementia support and care and that people with dementia are enabled and empowered to use it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Barbosa
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Ana Rita Ferreira
- CINTESIS@RISE, Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Carolien Smits
- Dutch Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Pharos Expertise Centre on Health Disparities, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Flora-Marie Hegerath
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Horst Christian Vollmar
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Lia Fernandes
- CINTESIS@RISE, Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Michael P Craven
- Human Factors Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Anthea Innes
- Department Health, Aging and Society, Faculty of Social Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Dympna Casey
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Duygu Sezgin
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Louise Hopper
- School of Psychology, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Laila Øksnebjerg
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
PRICE D, DI GESSA G. Mental health and self-rated health of older carers during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from England. Aging Ment Health 2024; 28:103-111. [PMID: 37482075 PMCID: PMC10803633 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2023.2236569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Older carers play a vital role supporting population health and protecting health and social care systems, yet there has been little research on understanding the effect of the pandemic on this group. In this paper, we investigate caring as a factor contributing to mental and self-rated health. METHODS We investigate cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between provision of family care and mental health and wellbeing using longitudinal data from 5,149 members of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing who responded to Wave 9 (2018/2019) and two COVID-19 sub-studies (June/July 2020; November/December 2020). We use logistic or linear regression models depending on outcome measures, controlling for pre-pandemic socioeconomic, demographic, and health-related variables. RESULTS Before the pandemic, 21% of respondents cared for family or friends. Older people caring for someone inside the household mostly continued to provide care during the pandemic, with more than a quarter reporting an increase in the amount of care provided. Co-resident carers were disproportionately female, older, in the lowest wealth quintile, and more likely to report disability and chronic conditions. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses suggest that, compared to those caring for people living outside the household, co-resident carers were significantly more likely to report poorer mental health and self-rated health. CONCLUSION The health of older carers worsened disproportionately in the first year of the pandemic, a period also characterised by disruptions to support and closure of respite services. Support for carers' mental and physical health requires greater policy attention, especially in pandemic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debora PRICE
- Department of Sociology, School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Giorgio DI GESSA
- Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hill JR, Min EE, Abebe E, Holden RJ. Telecaregiving for Dementia: A Mapping Review of Technological and Nontechnological Interventions. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2024; 64:gnad026. [PMID: 36919597 PMCID: PMC10733214 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnad026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Informal (or family) caregivers to older adults with Alzheimer's disease or other related dementias (ADRD) could greatly benefit from innovative telecaregiving systems that support caregiving from a distance. The objective of this review is to better understand (a) who is involved in telecaregiving and their experiences; (b) the interventions currently available to support ADRD telecaregiving; and (c) the outcomes measured to assess the effects of ADRD telecaregiving interventions. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A mapping review was conducted by systematically searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO for all works published in English from 2002 to 2022. References of included publications were searched to identify additional empirical publications for inclusion. RESULTS Sixty-one publications (describing 48 studies and 5 nonstudy sources) were included in the review. Currently available information on the demographics, experiences, challenges, and benefits of ADRD telecaregivers is summarized. We found that interventions to support telecaregiving could be classified into 7 categories of technological interventions and 3 categories of nontechnological interventions. Empirical studies on ADRD telecaregiving interventions investigated a variety of outcomes, the most prevalent being user experience. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS We conclude that (a) the paucity of literature on telecaregiving does not allow for a comprehensive understanding of the needs and day-to-day activities of ADRD telecaregivers; (b) interventions developed to support ADRD telecaregiving may not fully meet the needs of caregivers or care recipients; and (c) there is insufficient rigorous research establishing the effects of telecaregiving interventions on key ADRD-related outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan R Hill
- Department of Health & Wellness Design, Indiana University School of Public Health—Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Elissa E Min
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Ephrem Abebe
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
- Regenstrief Center for Healthcare Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Richard J Holden
- Department of Health & Wellness Design, Indiana University School of Public Health—Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Giebel C, Heath B. A 3-UK-nation survey on dementia and the cost of living crisis: contributions of gender and ethnicity on struggling to pay for social care. Aging Ment Health 2023; 27:2368-2376. [PMID: 37027794 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2023.2197845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this 3-UK-nation online survey was to explore the impact of the cost of living crisis on the lives of people with dementia and their carers, specifically on their ability to access social care and support services, and the contributions of gender and ethnic background. METHODS A 3-UK-nation (England, Wales, Northern Ireland) 31-item online survey was conducted in October 2022 asking people with dementia, carers, and people knowing but not caring for someone with dementia about social care and support service access, cost of living crisis, and changes due to the cost of living crisis. Frequency analysis and Chi-square analysis were employed to assess whether forms of payment for services varied by gender. Pearson correlation analysis and binary logistic regression were used to assess whether gender and ethnicity were associated with struggling to pay for care since the crisis. RESULTS A total of 1,095 people with dementia, unpaid carers, and people who knew but not cared for someone with dementia participated. Of those, 745 people with dementia were utilising community-based social care and support services. Twenty percent of those with complete data had reduced their spending on care services since the crisis. Men and those from non-white ethnic backgrounds were at significantly increased odds of struggling to pay for care services. CONCLUSIONS The cost of living crisis has led to exacerbated inequalities in accessing and using dementia care. Men and those from non-white ethnic backgrounds in particular need to receive greater support in accessing care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarissa Giebel
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Giebel C, Reilly S, Gabbay M, Dickinson J, Tetlow H, Hogan H, Griffiths A, Cooper C. Dementia care navigation: A systematic review on different service types and their prevalence. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2023; 38:e5977. [PMID: 37526320 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dementia Care Navigators (DCNs) are professionals without clinical training, who provide individualised emotional and practical support to people living with dementia, working alongside clinical services. Navigator services have been implemented but the service offered vary without a consistent overview provided. The aim of this narrative systematic review was to describe and compare existing service formats, and to synthesise evidence regarding their implementation and impacts. METHODS The review was registered on PROSPERO [CRD42021292518]. Three electronic databases were searched and included studies reported on a DCN service, defined as a service in which non-clinically trained workers provide personalised advice and support to people with dementia and/or carers in the community. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and titles and read through full papers for inclusion. Risk of bias was assessed using the Standard Quality Assessment QualSyst. RESULTS We included 14 papers reporting on six studies. All services were US-based and only varied by integration and training provided. Studies reported different degrees of impact on service utilisation and on symptoms and mental well-being of people with dementia and their carers, with too little evidence to draw substantial/meaningful conclusions and studies employing different outcome measures. One study evidenced greater impacts on people with more advanced dementia compared to earlier stages. CONCLUSIONS DCN services have the potential to effectively provide non-clinical support to people with dementia and carers from the point of diagnosis. Further research from countries other than the USA, focusing on the impact on social care and social support service access and utilisation, and utilising similar established outcome measures are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarissa Giebel
- Department of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, UK
| | - Siobhan Reilly
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Mark Gabbay
- Department of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, UK
| | - Julie Dickinson
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, UK
| | - Hilary Tetlow
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Alys Griffiths
- Department of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Centre of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Giebel C, Talbot CV, Wharton E, Lorenz-Dant K, Suárez-González A, Cannon J, Tetlow H, Lion KM, Thyrian JR. The early impacts of COVID-19 on unpaid carers of people living with dementia: part II of a mixed-methods systematic review. Aging Ment Health 2023; 27:547-562. [PMID: 35818800 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2084510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES With a lack of existing comprehensive reviews, the aim of this mixed-method systematic review was to synthesise the evidence on the early impacts of the pandemic on unpaid dementia carers across the globe. METHODS This review was registered on PROSPERO [CDR42021248050]. PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from 2020 to July 2021. Studies were included if they reported on the different impacts of the pandemic on unpaid dementia carers aged 18+, with papers published in English, German, Polish, or Spanish. A number of research team members were involved in the selection of studies following PRISMA guidance. RESULTS Thirty-six studies (43 papers) from 18 countries reported on the early impact of the pandemic on unpaid dementia carers. Impacts were noted on accessing care and support; carer burden; and well-being. Studies found that carers had limited access to care and support services, increased workload, enhanced feelings of social isolation, and reduced wellbeing. Specifically, reductions in access to care and support increased carer's unpaid caring tasks, removing any opportunities for temporary respite, and thus further increasing carer burden and reducing mental well-being in many. CONCLUSIONS The needs of unpaid dementia carers appear to have increased during the pandemic, without adequate support provided. Policy initiatives need to enable better mental health support and formal care provision for unpaid carers and their relatives with dementia, whilst future research needs to explore the long-term implications of carer needs in light of care home restrictions and care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarissa Giebel
- Department of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- NIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Emily Wharton
- NIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK
- School for Sport and Exercise Science, Liverpool John Moore's University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Klara Lorenz-Dant
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | | | | | - Hilary Tetlow
- NIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK
- SURF Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Katarzyna M Lion
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jochen René Thyrian
- German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
- Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Giebel C, Lion KM, Lorenz-Dant K, Suárez-González A, Talbot C, Wharton E, Cannon J, Tetlow H, Thyrian JR. The early impacts of COVID-19 on people living with dementia: part I of a mixed-methods systematic review. Aging Ment Health 2023; 27:533-546. [PMID: 35763444 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2084509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this Part I systematic review was to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the lives of people with dementia living in the community or in residential care. Part II focused on unpaid carers.Methods: This review was registered on PROSPERO [CRD42021248050]. Five data bases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched in July 2021. Studies were included if they reported on the impacts of the pandemic on people living with dementia, either in the community or residential settings, and published in English, German, Polish, or Spanish. Risk of bias was assessed using the Standard Quality Assessment QualSyst.Results: Forty papers from 33 studies reported on the effects of COVID-19 on people with dementia. Included studies were conducted across 15 countries, focusing on single-country evaluations except in one study. Three studies focused on care homes, whilst the remainder reported on the community. Studies were categorised into five impacts: Cognition; Independence and physical functioning; Behavioural symptoms; Well-being; and Access to care. All studies evidenced the negative pandemic impacts, including faster cognitive, physical, and behavioural deterioration, limited access to care, and poorer mental and social health.Conclusions: Future restrictions need to consider the need for people with dementia to stay cognitively, physically, and socially stimulated to live well, and this review provides a call for a future pandemic strategy for dementia. Longitudinal research is required on the long-term impacts of the pandemic on the lives of people with dementia, including time to care home entry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarissa Giebel
- Department of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- NIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK
| | - Katarzyna M Lion
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Klara Lorenz-Dant
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | | | - Catherine Talbot
- Faculty of Science & Technology, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK
| | - Emily Wharton
- NIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK
- School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moore's University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jacqueline Cannon
- School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moore's University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Hilary Tetlow
- NIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK
- Lewy Body Society, Wigan, UK
| | - Jochen René Thyrian
- Lewy Body Society, Wigan, UK
- SURF Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Greifswald, Germany
- Institute for Community Medicine, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Giebel C, Halpin K, Tottie J, O'Connell L, Carton J. The digitalisation of finance management skills in dementia since the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. DEMENTIA 2023; 22:783-806. [PMID: 36803284 PMCID: PMC9944462 DOI: 10.1177/14713012231159156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Engaging with finances has become increasingly digitalised in recent years, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic, yet it is unknown how finance management has been affected in people living with dementia. The aim of this qualitative study was therefore to explore how digitalisation and the recent pandemic have affected finance management skills in people with dementia. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted remotely with people with dementia and unpaid carers living in the UK via phone or Zoom between February and May 2022. Transcripts were coded by one of four different research team members, including two unpaid carers who were public advisers on the project. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Thirty carers and people with dementia participated, and five overarching themes were identified. Managing finances has been both simplified and made more complicated by digitalising how money is spent and managed, with people with dementia and unpaid carers reporting advantages of using direct debits and debit cards, as well as digital illiteracy barriers for older relatives with dementia. Unpaid carers have received no support in managing their relative's finances, and were found to be burdened by the additional caring duties. CONCLUSIONS Carers need to be supported in managing their relative's finances as well as with their general well-being due to taking on additional caring duties. Digital systems for finance management need to be user-friendly for people with cognitive impairment, with a need for digital literacy training for middle-aged and older adults to avoid difficulties if they develop dementia, and improved access to a computer/tablet/smart phone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarissa Giebel
- Clarissa Giebel, Department of Primary Care
& Mental Health, University of Liverpool, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69
3GL, UK.
| | - Kath Halpin
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jean Tottie
- TIDE (Together In Dementia Everyday), Liverpool, UK
| | - Lena O'Connell
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, 4591University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, UK
| | - Joan Carton
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
"Because if I don't hold his hand then I might as well not be there": Experiences of Dutch and UK care home visiting during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int Psychogeriatr 2023; 35:107-116. [PMID: 35039101 DOI: 10.1017/s1041610221002799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore and compare the experiences of care home visits during the pandemic in the UK and the Netherlands. DESIGN Qualitative semi-structured interview studies. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Family carers of relatives residing in care homes in the UK and the Netherlands were interviewed remotely. METHODS Family carers were asked about their experiences of care home visits during the pandemic, and specifically in the Netherlands after care homes had reopened. Transcripts were analyzed in each country separately in the native language using thematic analysis, before discussing findings at multiple analysis meetings. RESULTS Across 125 interviews, we developed four themes: (1) different types of contact during lockdown; (2) deterioration of resident health and well-being; (3) emotional distress of both visitors and residents; and (4) compliance to guidelines and regulations. Visiting in both the UK and the Netherlands was beneficial, if possible in the UK, yet was characterized by alternative forms of face-to-face visits which was emotionally distressing for many family carers and residents. In the Netherlands, government guidance did enable early care home visitation, while the UK was lacking any guidance leading to care homes implementing restrictions differently. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Early and clear guidance, as well as communication, is required in future pandemics, and in this ongoing pandemic, to enable care home visits between residents and loved ones. It is important to take learnings from this global pandemic to reimagine long-term care, highlighting the value of socializing for care home residents.
Collapse
|
11
|
Daly-Lynn J, Ryan A, McCormack B, Martin S. Stakeholder's experiences of living and caring in technology-rich supported living environments for tenants living with dementia. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:62. [PMID: 36726077 PMCID: PMC9889957 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-03751-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technology innovation provides an opportunity to support the rising number of people living with dementia globally. The present study examines experiences of people who have dementia and live in technology enriched supported care models. Additionally, it explores caregiver's attitudes towards technology use with the housing scheme. METHODS A qualitative research design was adopted, and eight housing schemes consented to take part in the study. A technology audit was undertaken in addition to participant interviews and caregiver survey. Seven peer researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 people living with dementia. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. Informal and formal caregivers were invited to complete a survey to capture their attitudes towards technology use. A total of 20 informal and 31 formal caregiver surveys were returned. All surveys were input into Survey Monkey and downloaded into excel for analysis. Closed questions were analysed using descriptive statistics and open-ended questions were organised into themes and described descriptively. RESULTS The technology audit identified that technologies were in place from as early as 2002. Technology heterogeneity of, both passive and active devices, was found within the housing schemes. Technologies such as wearable devices were reportedly used according to need, and mobile phone use was widely adopted. The themes that developed out of the tenant interviews were: Attitudes and Engagement with Technology; Technology Enhancing Tenants Sense of Security; Seeking Support and Digital Literacy; and Technology Enabled Connection. A lack of awareness about living alongside technology was a major finding. Technologies enabled a sense of reassurance and facilitated connections with the wider community. The interaction with technology presented challenges, for example, remembering passwords, access to Wi-Fi and the identification of its use in an emergency. The caregiver survey reported a range of facilitators and barriers for the use of technology within care. Both types of caregivers held relatively similar views around the benefits of technology, however their views on issues such as privacy and consent varied. Safety was considered more important than right to privacy by family caregivers. CONCLUSIONS The present study provides new insight into stakeholder's experiences of living, working and caregiving alongside technology in supported living environments. As the generation of people living with dementia become more tech savvy, harnessing everyday technologies to support care could enable holistic care and support the transition through the care continuum. Advance care planning and technology assessments are at the very core of future technology provision. It is evident that a paternalistic attitudes towards technology use could impact the multitude of benefits technology can play in both health and leisure for people living with dementia and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Daly-Lynn
- grid.12641.300000000105519715School of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland
| | - Assumpta Ryan
- School of Nursing, Ulster University, Magee, Northern Ireland
| | - Brendan McCormack
- grid.104846.fHead of Division of Nursing, Queen Margaret University, Scotland, UK
| | - Suzanne Martin
- grid.12641.300000000105519715School of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights into identity from the IDEAL cohort. AGEING & SOCIETY 2023. [DOI: 10.1017/s0144686x22001350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
The continuing COVID-19 pandemic and social restrictions have impacted on the cognitive decline and mental health of people with dementia. Social isolation and loss of activities due to social restrictions may also have implications as to sense of identity for people with dementia. As part of the INCLUDE (Identifying and Mitigating the Individual and Dyadic Impact of COVID-19 and Life Under Physical Distancing on People with Dementia and Carers) component of the IDEAL (Improving the Experience of Dementia and Enhancing Active Life) cohort study, the overall aim of this subtle realist qualitative study was to explore the perspectives of people with dementia on living through the COVID-19 pandemic within the context of the ‘post-vaccine’ period and the national lockdowns in England and Wales; and to determine perceived challenges to and facilitators of ‘living well’ during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond as restrictions were eased. In addition, the study findings are considered in relation to understandings of identity in dementia which the broader accounts of living through the pandemic have highlighted. Seven people with mild-to-moderate dementia were interviewed and themes were derived using framework analysis. Themes suggest interviewees' stoic acceptance of the pandemic and social restrictions but also fear of decline related to the temporality of their condition as well as loss of self-confidence to re-engage with the world. Interviewees managed threats to social identity by striving to maintain social and emotional connections, where the importance of a shared, social identity, particularly for people with young-onset dementia, was also apparent. Unlike in previous studies during the pandemic, the relevance of occupation for identity was observed, where maintaining previous or new activities or occupations was important to facilitate identity as well as to keep a sense of purpose. Therefore, as well as supporting people with dementia as the pandemic eases, future research into occupation and identity in dementia is of potential value.
Collapse
|
13
|
Kazawa K, Kubo T, Akishita M, Ishii S. Restrictions on visits and outings in geriatric care facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; 22:982-983. [PMID: 36151770 PMCID: PMC9538313 DOI: 10.1111/ggi.14484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kana Kazawa
- Department of Medicine for Integrated Approach to Social Inclusion, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Tatsuhiko Kubo
- Department of Public Health and Health Policy, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Masahiro Akishita
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinya Ishii
- Department of Medicine for Integrated Approach to Social Inclusion, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Siette J, Knaggs G, Nguyen AD, Brett L, Jorgensen M, Gow E, Georgiou A. 'I go home with a happy heart'. Enhancing community aged care services to sustain togetherness: Perspectives from Australian staff and clients. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e1746-e1755. [PMID: 34633727 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Social participation is critical to the health and well-being of older adults, however, participation often declines with age. Research has identified that personal and environmental factors such as high socioeconomic status and accessible transportation are associated with higher levels of social participation. However, the barriers and facilitators to social participation experienced by older adults receiving community aged care services remains largely unexplored. This qualitative study aimed to generate context-rich data and identify the barriers and facilitators to effective community care services that can support older adults' participation in the community and contribute to individual well-being. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with 40 community aged care clients and 21 staff members between January to July 2018 and thematic analysis was undertaken. Environmental factors, such as availability and accessibility of transportation services emerged as the most important factors influencing participation. Older age, self-attitude towards one's own functional ability and limited social networks were important personal factors affecting participation. Proactive aged care services (e.g., engaged staff, tailored activities) were reported to assist with continual engagement in aged care services. In contrast, the type, location and accessibility of the activity, associated costs and limited options for accessible transportation were key barriers to older adults' social participation. Pathways contributing to positive engagement were complex and variable, but personal well-being and local community resources emerged as important factors encouraging higher social participation. These findings are discussed in the context of the ongoing pandemic and implications for future aged care services are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce Siette
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Ageing, Cognition and Wellbeing, Macquarie University, Macquarie, NSW, Australia
| | - Gilbert Knaggs
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia
- NHMRC Partnership Centre for Health System Sustainability, Macquarie University, Macquarie, NSW, Australia
| | - Amy D Nguyen
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lindsey Brett
- Department of Health Professions, Macquarie University, Macquarie, NSW, Australia
| | - Mikaela Jorgensen
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Edwina Gow
- UnitingCare Australia, Canberra, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Georgiou
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Ageing, Cognition and Wellbeing, Macquarie University, Macquarie, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Merizzi A, Biasi R, Zamudio JFÁ, Spagnuolo Lobb M, Di Rosa M, Santini S. A Single-Case Design Investigation for Measuring the Efficacy of Gestalt Therapy to Treat Depression in Older Adults with Dementia in Italy and in Mexico: A Research Protocol. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19063260. [PMID: 35328948 PMCID: PMC8950193 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Psychotherapy is one of the evidence-based clinical interventions for the treatment of depression in older adults with dementia. Randomised controlled trials are often the first methodological choice to gain evidence, yet they are not applicable to a wide range of humanistic psychotherapies. Amongst all, the efficacy of the Gestalt therapy (GT) is under-investigated. The purpose of this paper is to present a research protocol, aiming to assess the effects of a GT-based intervention on people with dementia (PWD) and indirect influence on their family carers. The study implements the single-case experimental design with time series analysis that will be carried out in Italy and Mexico. Six people in each country, who received a diagnosis of dementia and present depressive symptoms, will be recruited. Eight or more GT sessions will be provided, whose fidelity will be assessed by the GT fidelity scale. Quantitative outcome measures are foreseen for monitoring participants' depression, anxiety, quality of life, loneliness, carers' burden, and the caregiving dyad mutuality at baseline and follow-up. The advantages and limitations of the research design are considered. If GT will effectively result in the treatment of depression in PWD, it could enrich the range of evidence-based interventions provided by healthcare services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Merizzi
- Centre for Socio-Economic Research on Aging, IRCCS INRCA-National Institute of Health and Science on Aging, Via Santa Margherita 5, 60124 Ancona, Italy;
- Correspondence:
| | - Rosanna Biasi
- Istituto di Gestalt HCC Human Communication Centre Italy, Via S. Sebastiano 38, 96100 Siracusa, Italy; (R.B.); (M.S.L.)
| | | | - Margherita Spagnuolo Lobb
- Istituto di Gestalt HCC Human Communication Centre Italy, Via S. Sebastiano 38, 96100 Siracusa, Italy; (R.B.); (M.S.L.)
| | - Mirko Di Rosa
- Unit of Geriatric Pharmacoepidemiology and Biostatistics, IRCCS INRCA-National Institute of Health and Science on Aging, Via Santa Margherita 5, 60124 Ancona, Italy;
| | - Sara Santini
- Centre for Socio-Economic Research on Aging, IRCCS INRCA-National Institute of Health and Science on Aging, Via Santa Margherita 5, 60124 Ancona, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Daley S, Akarsu N, Armsby E, Farina N, Feeney Y, Fine B, Hughes L, Pooley J, Tabet N, Towson G, Banerjee S. What factors have influenced quality of life in people with dementia and their family carers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e053563. [PMID: 35144951 PMCID: PMC8845096 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant disruption to health and social care services. For people with dementia and their family carers this is problematic, as a group who rely on timely and responsive services to live well with the condition. This study has sought to understand how COVID-19 has affected the quality of life of people diagnosed with dementia and their family carers. DESIGN Our mixed-methods study was nested in a larger cohort study of an education programme, Time for Dementia. SETTING The study took place in the South-East of England. PARTICIPANTS Existing study participants, family carers were approached about the COVID-19 nested study. A purposeful sample of participants were invited to take part in in-depth qualitative interview. The sample included family carers in a range of different caring situations. MEASUREMENT Interviews were undertaken remotely by telephone. Interviews sought to understand quality of life before the pandemic, impact of the restrictions on both the person with dementia and family carer, role of services and other agencies as well as supportive factors. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS 16 family carers were interviewed. Seven themes were identified from our analysis: (1) decreased social interaction; (2) reduced support; (3) deteriorating cognitive and physical health for the person with dementia; (4) decreased carer well-being; (5) difficulties understanding COVID-19 restrictions; (6) limited impact for some and (7) trust and relationship with care home. There was little change between themes during the first and second wave of national lockdowns. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides an understanding the short-term impact of COVID-19 on the quality of life of people with dementia and their family carers. Our findings suggest that recovery between the first and second wave of the restrictions did not automatically take place.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Daley
- Centre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Nazire Akarsu
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
| | - Elise Armsby
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
| | - Nicolas Farina
- Centre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Yvonne Feeney
- Centre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Bethany Fine
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
| | - Laura Hughes
- Centre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Joanna Pooley
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
| | - Naji Tabet
- Centre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | | | - Sube Banerjee
- Centre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
- Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wheatley A, Poole M, Robinson L. Changes to postdiagnostic dementia support in England and Wales during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e059437. [PMID: 35110326 PMCID: PMC8811272 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the impact of COVID-19 on postdiagnostic dementia care and support provision in England and Wales. DESIGN Qualitative research using semistructured interviews, via video or telephone conferencing. SETTING Services providing postdiagnostic support across health, social care and the third sector. PARTICIPANTS 21 professionals previously recruited to an ongoing research programme on postdiagnostic dementia care (or colleagues, if unavailable). RESULTS Key themes identified from the data were: challenges caused by COVID-19; responses to those challenges, including a widespread shift to remote working; and effects of COVID-19 on future postdiagnostic support. Challenges included changing and sometimes conflicting guidelines; a lack of access to support; identifying and responding to emerging needs; emotional and physical impact of COVID-19; and balancing COVID-19 risk with other risks such as deterioration. Some dementia services closed, while others adapted and continued to provide support thus potentially widening existing inequalities. There were also some unintended positive outcomes, including improved cross-sector and multidisciplinary working between professionals. CONCLUSION Delivering postdiagnostic dementia support during COVID-19 required essential adaptations. While some changes were detrimental to service users, others were identified as potentially beneficial and highly likely to become the new 'norm', for example, use of blended approaches, combining virtual and face-to-face work, thus allowing more flexible, integrated care. Our data have implications for policy and practice to improve the response to the lingering effects of COVID-19 as well as creating service provision that is more resilient to future pandemics or other periods of disruption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Wheatley
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Marie Poole
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Louise Robinson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|