• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4623447)   Today's Articles (0)   Subscriber (49409)
For: Akintomide H, Brima N, Mansour DJ, Shawe J. Copper IUD continuation, unwanted effects and cost consequences at 1 year in users aged under 30 - a secondary analysis of the EURAS-IUD study. EUR J CONTRACEP REPR 2021;26:175-183. [PMID: 33715567 DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2021.1879783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Wemrell M, Gunnarsson L. Claims in the clinic: A qualitative group interview study on healthcare communication about unestablished side effects of the copper IUD. PLoS One 2023;18:e0291966. [PMID: 37768919 PMCID: PMC10538671 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]  Open
2
Steiner ML, Mendes JL, Strufaldi R, Carneiro M, Giovanelli SA, da Silva MH. Epidemiological profile and effectiveness of immediate postpartum contraception in Brazilian women. Front Glob Womens Health 2023;4:1052224. [PMID: 37637759 PMCID: PMC10450033 DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1052224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]  Open
3
Howard SA, Benhabbour SR. Non-Hormonal Contraception. J Clin Med 2023;12:4791. [PMID: 37510905 PMCID: PMC10381146 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]  Open
4
Boehnke T, Bauerfeind A, Eggebrecht L, Cellier C, Lange JA, Heinemann K, Madden T. TEMPORARILY WITHDRAWN: Does the shape of the copper intrauterine device play a role in expulsion? Results from the ongoing European Active Surveillance Study on LCS12. Contraception 2023:110111. [PMID: 37414331 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
5
FSRH Guideline (March 2023) Intrauterine contraception. BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2023;49:1-142. [PMID: 37188461 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-iuc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
6
Akintomide H, James A, Moffat M, Barnes P, Rankin J. Systematic review of copper intrauterine contraception continuation in young nulliparous women based on intrauterine device type. BMJ Open 2022;12:e060606. [PMID: 36192095 PMCID: PMC9535170 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]  Open
7
Hubacher D, Schreiber CA, Turok DK, Jensen JT, Creinin MD, Nanda K, White KO, Dayananda I, Teal SB, Chen PL, Chen BA, Goldberg AB, Kerns JL, Dart C, Nelson AL, Thomas MA, Archer DF, Brown JE, Castaño PM, Burke AE, Kaneshiro B, Blithe DL. Continuation rates of two different-sized copper intrauterine devices among nulliparous women: Interim 12-month results of a single-blind, randomised, multicentre trial. EClinicalMedicine 2022;51:101554. [PMID: 35865736 PMCID: PMC9294241 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]  Open
8
Provision of intrauterine contraceptive device sizes better suited to younger women based on outcomes at 1 year. Br J Gen Pract 2022. [DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22x720689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]  Open
9
Vitale SG, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Riemma G, De Franciscis P, Alonso Pacheco L, Carugno J. In-office hysteroscopic removal of retained or fragmented intrauterine device without anesthesia: a cross-sectional analysis of an international survey. Updates Surg 2022;74:1079-1085. [PMID: 35122582 PMCID: PMC9213345 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01246-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA