Session-Specific Effects on Suicidality in Group Therapy: No Evidence for Contagion

Expected increase in health competence improves over modules of an unguided internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder

Internet-based cognitive-behavioural interventions (iCBT) are a valuable alternative to face-to-face psychotherapy. An unguided iCBT program has shown to be efficacious for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, the modules' mode of action is not well understood, which is the objective of the present study. Twenty-five patients with OCD who participated at the iCBT program for 8 weeks answered a questionnaire on their self-efficacy, motivation, expected increase in health competence and experiential avoidance before and after each module and were included in the present analyses. Linear mixed-effects models demonstrated that patients' expected increase in health competence improved over the course of the treatment. No within-module-specific effect was found. The iCBT program was able to improve patients' expected health competence. However, all other variables did not change. The iCBT program should be revised by focusing more strongly on the integration of the content to reduce experiential avoidance and to improve motivation.

How to assess and analyse session-specific effects and predictors: An example with the Metacognitive Training for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder intervention

It is essential to understand the effects of specific therapy elements (i.e., mechanisms of change) to optimize the efficacy of available treatments. There are, however, existing challenges in the assessment and analysis of constructs of interest. The present study aims to improve research on the effects of specific therapy elements using the example of the Metacognitive Training for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (MCT-OCD) intervention. Specifically, we introduce an innovative analytical method to identify predictors of treatment outcome and expand the assessment of common factors (e.g., coping expectations). A sample of 50 day- and inpatients with OCD was assessed before and after participation in an 8-week MCT-OCD programme. We investigated within-session change in scores on revised questionnaires administered before and after each session. Linear mixed models (for session-effects) and lasso regression (for prediction analyses) were used to analyse data. The revised assessments and data analyses showed greater improvement in dysfunctional (meta-)cognitive beliefs over the time of the intervention and within sessions compared to previous MCT-OCD studies. Some predictors, for example, improvement in coping expectation after the module on overestimation of threat for treatment outcome, were identified. The present study contributed to a better understanding of how to assess and analyse data of a modular intervention and demonstrated the strengths and weaknesses of different analytic approaches. Moreover, the analyses provided a deeper understanding of the specific effects and mechanisms of change of MCT-OCD modules, which can be refined and examined in future studies.

Efficacy of metacognitive training for depression as add-on intervention for patients with depression in acute intensive psychiatric inpatient care: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Metacognitive training for depression (D-MCT) is a novel low-intensity group training for economic treatment of depression. Previous studies demonstrate its efficacy in moderately depressed outpatients. The present study evaluated efficacy and patients' perspective of the D-MCT in severely depressed psychiatric inpatients.

METHODS

In a randomized-controlled trial, 75 individuals with a major depressive disorder (MDD) were allocated to D-MCT versus euthymic therapy as add-on (twice a week) to cognitive-behavioural-based (CBT) inpatient-care. Depressive symptoms (HDRS, BDI), dysfunctional (meta)cognition (DAS, MCQ-30) and subjective appraisal were assessed at baseline, 4 weeks (post) and 3 months (follow-up).

RESULTS

Participants in both conditions showed a large decline in depression at post and follow-up-assessment. No superior add-effect of D-MCT versus active control emerged for depression severity on top of the inpatient care. However, among patients with a diagnosis of MDD with no (vs. at least one) comorbidity, D-MCT participants showed a larger decline in depressive (meta-)cognition at follow-up with medium-to-large effect sizes. D-MCT was evaluated as superior in overall appraisal, treatment preference, motivation and satisfaction.

LIMITATIONS

The follow-up time interval of 3 months may have been too short to detect long-term effects. There is emerging evidence that modification of (meta)cognition unfolds its full effects only with time. Effects of CBT inpatient-care on outcome parameters cannot be differentiated.

CONCLUSIONS

Although D-MCT as an add-on was not superior in complete case analyses, results suggest greater benefit for patients with MDD and no comorbidity. D-MCT proved feasible in acute-psychiatric inpatient-care and was highly accepted by patients. Future studies should investigate the role of modified (meta)cognition on long-term treatment outcome, including dropout and relapse rates.