Variant phenotype of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy associated with compound heterozygous mutations in VMD2

Clinical and genetic features in autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy in Chinese cohort

PURPOSE

To provide a genotype and phenotype characterization of the BEST1 mutation in Chinese patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) through multimodal imaging and next-generation sequencing (NGS).

METHODS

Seventeen patients from 17 unrelated families of Chinese origin with ARB were included in a retrospective cohort study. Phenotypic characteristics, including anterior segment features, were assessed by multimodal imaging. Multigene panel testing, involving 586 ophthalmic disease-associated genes, and Sanger sequencing were performed to identify disease-causing variants.

RESULTS

Among 17 ARB patients, the mean follow-up was 15.65 months and average onset age was 30.53 years (range: 9-68). Best corrected visual acuity ranged from light perception to 0.8. EOG recordings showed a typically decreased Arden ratio in 12 patients, and a normal or slightly decreased Arden ratio in two patients. Anterior features included shallow anterior chambers (16/17), ciliary pronation (16/17), iris bombe (13/17), iridoschisis (2/17), iris plateau (1/17), narrow angles (16/17) and reduced axial lengths (16/17). Sixteen patients had multiple bilateral small, round, yellow vitelliform deposits distributed throughout the posterior pole, surrounding the optic disc. Initial diagnoses included angle-closure glaucoma (four patients), Best disease (three patients), and central serous chorioretinopathy secondary to choroidal neovascularization (CNV) (one patient), with the remainder diagnosed with ARB. Fourteen patients underwent preventive laser peripheral iridotomy, four of whom also received combined trabeculectomy and iridotomy in both eyes for uncontrolled intraocular pressure. One patient received intravitreal conbercept for CNV. Overall, 15 distinct disease-causing variants of BEST1 were identified, with 14 (82.35%) patients having missense mutations. Common mutations included p. Arg255-256 and p. Ala195Val (both 23.68%), with the most frequent sites in exons 7 and 5.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a comprehensive characterization of anterior segment and genetic features in ARB, with a wide array of morphological abnormalities. Findings are relevant for refining clinical practices and genetic counseling and advancing pathogenesis research.

Knockdown of best1 Gene in Zebrafish Caused Abnormal Neuronal and Skeletal Development - A Subtype of Craniovertebral Junction Malformation?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the developmental defects caused by knockdown of best1 gene in zebrafish as a model for a subtype of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) malformation.

METHODS

Two antisense morpholinos (MOs) were designed targeting zebrafish best1 to block translation (ATG-MO) or to disrupt splicing (I3E4-MO). MOs were microinjected into fertilized one-cell embryos. Efficacy of splicing MO was confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Phenotypes were analyzed and quantified by microscopy at multiple developmental stages. Neuronal outgrowth was assessed in transgenic zebrafish expressing green fluorescent protein in neurons. Skeletal ossification was visualized by Calcein staining.

RESULTS

Knockdown of best1 resulted in zebrafish embryos with shorter body length, curved axis, low survival rate, microcephaly, reduced eye size, smaller head and brain, impaired neuronal outgrowth, and reduced ossification of craniofacial and vertebral bone.

CONCLUSION

Best1 gene plays critical roles in ophthalmologic, neurological and skeletal development in zebrafish. A patient with a premature stop codon in BEST1 gene exhibited similar phenotypes, implying a subtype of CVJ malformation.

Retinal response to light exposure in BEST1-mutant dogs evaluated with ultra-high resolution OCT

Mutations in BEST1 cause an autosomal recessive disease in dogs where the earliest changes localize to the photoreceptor-RPE interface and show a retina-wide micro-detachment that is modulated by light exposure. The purpose of this study was to define the spatial and temporal details of the outer retina and its response to light with ultra-high resolution OCT across a range of ages and with different BEST1 mutations. Three retinal regions were selected in each eye: near the fovea-like area, near the optic nerve, both in the tapetal area, and inferior to the optic nerve in the non-tapetal area. The OS+ slab thickness was defined between the peak near the junction of inner and outer segments (IS/OS) and the transition between basal RPE, Bruch membrane, choriocapillaris and proximal tapetum (RPE/T). In wildtype (WT) dogs, two tapetal regions showed additional hyperscattering OCT peaks within the OS+ slab likely representing cone and rod outer segment tips (COST and ROST). The inferior non-tapetal region of WT dogs had only one of these peaks, likely ROST. In dogs with BEST1 mutations, all three locations showed a single peak, likely suggesting optical silence of COST. Light-dependent expansion of the micro-detachment by about 10 um was detectable in both tapetal and non-tapetal retina across all ages and BEST1 mutations.

Best Disease: Global Mutations Review, Genotype-Phenotype Correlation, and Prevalence Analysis in the Israeli Population

Purpose

To review all reported disease-causing mutations in BEST1, perform genotype-phenotype correlation, and estimate disease prevalence in the Israeli population.

Methods

Medical records of patients diagnosed with Best disease and allied diseases from nine Israeli medical centers over the past 20 years were collected, as were clinical data including ocular findings, electrophysiology results, and retina imaging. Mutation detection involved mainly whole exome sequencing and candidate gene analysis. Demographic data were obtained from the Israeli Bureau of Statistics (January 2023). A bibliometric study was also conducted to gather mutation data from online sources.

Results

A total of 134 patients were clinically diagnosed with Best disease and related conditions. The estimated prevalence of Best disease was calculated to be 1 in 127,000, with higher rates among Arab Muslims (1 in 76,000) than Jews (1 in 145,000). Genetic causes were identified in 76 individuals (57%), primarily showing autosomal-dominant inheritance due to BEST1 mutations (58 patients). Critical conserved domains were identified consisting of a high percentage of dominant missense mutations, primarily in transmembrane domains and the intracellular region (Ca2+ binding domain) of the BEST1 protein.

Conclusions

This study represents the largest cohort of patients with Best disease reported in Israel and globally. The prevalence in Israel is akin to that in Denmark but is lower than that in the United States. Critical conserved domains within the BEST1 protein are pivotal for normal functioning, and even minor missense alterations in these areas lead to a dominant disease manifestation. Genetic testing is indispensable as the gold standard for Best disease diagnosis due to the variable clinical presentation of the disease.

Non-vasogenic cystoid maculopathy in autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy: novel insights from NIR-FAF and OCTA imaging

BACKGROUND

Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy (ARB) is an inherited retinal disease caused by biallelic mutations in the BEST1 gene. Herein, we report the multimodal imaging findings of ARB presenting with cystoid maculopathy and investigate the short-term response to combined systemic and topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An observational, prospective, case series on two siblings affected by ARB is presented. Patients underwent genetic testing and optical coherence tomography (OCT), blue-light fundus autofluorescence (BL-FAF), near-infrared fundus autofluorescence (NIR-FAF), fluorescein angiography (FA), MultiColor imaging, and OCT angiography (OCTA).

RESULTS

Two male siblings, aged 22 and 16, affected by ARB resulting from c.598C>T, p.(Arg200*) and c.728C>A, p.(Ala243Glu) BEST1 compound heterozygous variants, presented with bilateral multifocal yellowish pigment deposits scattered through the posterior pole that corresponded to hyperautofluorescent deposits on BL-FAF. Vice versa, NIR-FAF mainly disclosed wide hypoautofluorescent areas in the macula. A cystoid maculopathy and shallow subretinal fluid were evident on structural OCT, albeit without evidence of dye leakage or pooling on FA. OCTA demonstrated disruption of the choriocapillaris throughout the posterior pole and sparing of intraretinal capillary plexuses. Six months of combined therapy with oral acetazolamide and topical brinzolamide resulted in limited clinical benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

We reported two siblings affected by ARB, presenting as non-vasogenic cystoid maculopathy. Prominent alteration of NIR-FAF signal and concomitant choriocapillaris rarefaction on OCTA were noted in the macula. The limited short-term response to combined systemic and topical CAIs might be explained by the impairment of the RPE-CC complex.

Typical best vitelliform dystrophy secondary to biallelic variants in BEST1

BACKGROUND

Pathogenic variants in BEST1 can cause autosomal dominant or autosomal recessive dystrophy, typically associated with distinct retinal phenotypes. In heterozygous cases, the disorder is commonly characterized by yellow sub-macular lesions in the early stages, known as Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD). Biallelic variants usually cause a more severe phenotype including diffuse retinal pigment epithelial irregularity and widespread generalized progressive retinopathy, known as autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB). This study describes three cases with clinical changes consistent with BVMD, however, unusually associated with autosomal recessive inheritance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Detailed ophthalmic workup included comprehensive ophthalmologic examination, multimodal retinal imaging, full-field and pattern electroretinography (ERG; PERG), and electrooculogram (EOG). Genetic analysis of probands and segregation testing and fundus examination of proband relatives was performed where possible.

RESULTS

Three unrelated cases presented with a clinical phenotype typical for BVMD and were found to have biallelic disease-causing variants in BEST1. PERG P50 and ERG were normal in all cases. The EOG was subnormal (probands 1 and 3) or normal/borderline (proband 2). Probands 1 and 2 were homozygous for the BEST1 missense variant c.139C>T, p.Arg47Cys, while proband 3 was homozygous for a deletion, c.536_538delACA, p.Asn179del. The parents of proband 1 were phenotypically normal. Parents of proband 1 and 2 were heterozygous for the same missense variant.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with biallelic variants in BEST1 can present with a phenotype indistinguishable from BVMD. The same clinical phenotype may not be evident in those harboring the same variants in the heterozygous state. This has implications for genetic counselling and prognosticationA.

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy combined with neurofibromatosis type 1 in a patient

BACKGROUND

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a multisystem genetic disorder that may affect multiple systems of the body. Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) is a rare retinal dystrophy caused by autosomal recessively mutations in bestrophin 1 (BEST1) gene. So far, we have not retrieved any case report of the same patient with both NF1 and BEST1 gene mutations.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 8-year-old female patient with café-au-lait spots, freckling on skin presented to our ophthalmology clinic for routine ophthalmological examination. Her best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/20 in both eyes. Slit-lamp examination of both eyes revealed few yellowish-brown dome-shaped Lisch nodules over the iris surface. Fundus examination was notable for bilateral confluent yellowish subretinal deposits at macula, few yellow flecks at temporal retina, and cup-to-disc ratio of 0.2. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) revealed subretinal fluid (SRF) involving the fovea, elongated photoreceptor outer segments and mild intraretinal fluid (IRF) at bilateral macula. Fundus autofluorescence demonstrated hyperautofluorescence in the area corresponding to the subretinal deposits. Whole-exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing were used to investigate genetic mutation in the patient and her parents. A BEST1 gene heterozygous missense c.604 C > T (p.Arg202Trp) was identified in the patient and her mother. Also, the patient carries an NF1 nonsense mutation c.6637 C > T (p.Gln2213*) with the mosaic generalized phenotype. There were no visual impairments or obvious neurological, musculoskeletal, behavioral or other symptoms in this patient, so she was managed conservatively and advised to follow up regularly for a long time.

CONCLUSIONS

ARB and NF1, which are caused by two different pathogenic gene mutations, have rarely coexisted in the same patient. The discovery of pathogenic gene mutations may play a crucial role in more accurate diagnostics and genetic consultations for individuals and their families.

Photoreceptor function and structure in retinal degenerations caused by biallelic BEST1 mutations

The only approved retinal gene therapy is for biallelic RPE65 mutations which cause a recessive retinopathy with a primary molecular defect located at the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). For a distinct recessive RPE disease caused by biallelic BEST1 mutations, a pre-clinical proof-of-concept for gene therapy has been demonstrated in canine eyes. The current study was undertaken to consider potential outcome measures for a BEST1 clinical trial in patients demonstrating a classic autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) phenotype. Spatial distribution of retinal structure showed a wide expanse of abnormalities including large intraretinal cysts, shallow serous retinal detachments, abnormalities of inner and outer segments, and an unusual prominence of the external limiting membrane. Surrounding the central macula extending from 7 to 30 deg eccentricity, outer nuclear layer was thicker than expected from a cone only retina and implied survival of many rod photoreceptors. Co-localized however, were large losses of rod sensitivity despite preserved cone sensitivities. The dissociation of rod function from rod structure observed, supports a large treatment potential in the paramacular region for biallelic bestrophinopathies.

A novel compound heterozygous BEST1 gene mutation in two siblings causing autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy

PURPOSE

To describe the clinical features, imaging characteristics, and genetic test results associated with a novel compound heterozygous mutation of the BEST1 gene in two siblings with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy.

METHODS

Two siblings underwent a complete ophthalmic examination, including dilated fundus examination, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography, electroretinography, and electrooculography. A clinical diagnosis of autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy was established based on ocular examination and multimodal retinal imaging. Subsequently, clinical exome sequencing consisting of a panel of 6670 genes was carried out to confirm the diagnosis and assess genetic alterations in the protein-coding region of the genome of the patients. The identified mutations were tested in the two affected siblings and one of their parents.

RESULTS

Two siblings (a 17-year-old female and a 15-year-old male) presented with reduced visual acuity and bilaterally symmetrical subretinal deposits of hyperautofluorescent materials in the posterior pole, which showed staining in the late phase of fluorescein angiogram. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography demonstrated hyperreflective subretinal deposits and subretinal fluid accumulation. Both patients shared two mutations in the protein-coding region of the BEST1 gene, c.103G > A, p.(Glu35Lys) and c.313C > A, p.(Arg105Ser) (a novel disease-causing mutation). Sanger sequencing confirmed that the unaffected mother of the proband was carrying p.(Glu35Lys) variant in a heterozygous state.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified and described the phenotype of a novel disease-causing mutation NM_004183.4:c.313C > A, p.(Arg105Ser) in a heterozygous state along with a previously reported mutation NM_004183.4:c.103G > A, p.(Glu35Lys) of the BEST1 gene in two related patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy.

Microstructural changes of photoreceptor layers detected by ultrahigh-resolution SD-OCT in patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy

Purpose

To determine the changes in the microstructures of the photoreceptors in patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) by ultrahigh-resolution spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (UHR-SD-OCT).

Methods

Five eyes of 4 patients with ARB were studied. Cross-sectional images of the fovea were recorded by the UHR-SD-OCT system with a depth resolution of <2.0 μm.

Results

The UHR-SD-OCT images revealed changes in the outer retinal structures that were dependent on the severity of the photoreceptor atrophy. There was an increase in the reflectivity and appearance of small hyperreflective dots (HRDs) in the outer segments, followed by an irregularity and decrease in the length of the outer segments, then a disruption of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) band, and appearance of large HRDs corresponding to the segmented ellipsoids. Finally, there was a disappearance of the large HRDs followed by a localized thinning of the outer nuclear layer and appearance of hyperreflective foci above the region of the disrupted EZ.

Conclusions

UHR-SD-OCT can record images that show detailed changes of the microstructures of the photoreceptors at different stages of ARB. These observations should help in determining the mechanisms involved in retinal pathology and should provide important information on the effectiveness of treatments.

Photoreceptor Function and Structure in Autosomal Dominant Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy Caused by BEST1 Mutations

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate rod and cone function and outer retinal structure within macular lesions, and surrounding extralesional areas of patients with autosomal dominant Best vitelliform macular dystrophy caused by BEST1 mutations.

Methods

Seventeen patients from seven families were examined with dark- and light-adapted chromatic perimetry and optical coherence tomography. Subsets of patients had long-term follow-up (14-22 years, n = 6) and dark-adaptation kinetics measured (n = 5).

Results

Within central lesions with large serous retinal detachments, rod sensitivity was severely reduced but visual acuity and cone sensitivity were relatively retained. In surrounding extralesional areas, there was a mild but detectable widening of the subretinal space in some patients and some retinal areas. Available evidence was consistent with subretinal widening causing slower dark-adaptation kinetics. Over long-term follow-up, some eyes showed formation of de novo satellite lesions at retinal locations that years previously demonstrated subretinal widening. A subclinical abnormality consisting of a retina-wide mild thickening of the outer nuclear layer was evident in many patients and thickening increased in the subset of patients with long-term follow-up.

Conclusions

Outcome measures for future clinical trials should include evaluations of rod sensitivity within central lesions and quantitative measures of outer retinal structure in normal-appearing regions surrounding the lesions.

Clinical findings in eyes with BEST1-related retinopathy complicated by choroidal neovascularization

PURPOSE

To determine the characteristics of eyes diagnosed with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) complicated by choroidal neovascularization (CNV).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multicenter observational case series. Fourteen genetically confirmed BVMD patients and 9 ARB patients who had been examined in 2 ophthalmological institutions in Japan were studied. The findings in a series of ophthalmic examinations including B-scan optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) were reviewed.

RESULTS

CNV was identified in 5 eyes (17.9%) of BVMD patients and in 2 eyes (11.1%) of ARB patients. Three of 5 eyes with BVMD were classified as being at the vitelliruptive stage and 2 eyes at the atrophic stage. The CNV in 2 BVMD eyes were diagnosed as exudative because of acute visual acuity reduction, retinal hemorrhage, and intraretinal fluid, while the CNV in 3 BVMD eyes and 2 ARB eyes were diagnosed as non-exudative. The visual acuity of the two eyes with exudative CNV did not improve despite anti-VEGF treatments. None of the eyes with non-exudative CNV had a reduction of their visual acuity for at least 4 years. All of the CNV were located within hyperreflective materials which were detected in 16 eyes (57.1%) of the BVMD eyes and in 7 eyes (38.9%) of the ARB eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

CNV is a relatively common complication in BEST1-related retinopathy in Asian population as well. The prognosis of eyes with exudative CNV is not always good, and OCTA can detect CNV in eyes possessing hyperreflective materials.

Phenotypic and Genetic Spectrum of Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy and Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy

Purpose

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) and vitelliform macular dystrophy (VMD) are distinct phenotypes, typically inherited through recessive and dominant patterns, respectively. Recessively inherited VMD (arVMD) has been reported, suggesting that dominant and recessive BEST1-related retinopathies represent a single disease spectrum. This study compares adVMD, arVMD, and ARB to determine whether a continuum exists and to define clinical and genetic features to aid diagnosis and management.

Methods

One arVMD patient and nine ARB patients underwent standard ophthalmic examination, imaging, electrophysiology, and genetic assessments. A meta-analysis of reported BEST1 variants was compiled, and clinical parameters were analyzed with regard to inheritance and phenotype.

Results

Among 10 patients with biallelic BEST1 variants, three novel ARB variants (p.Asp118Ala, p.Leu224Gln, p.Val273del) were discovered. A patient with homozygous p.Glu35Lys was clinically unique, presenting with VMD, including hyperautofluorescence extending beyond the macula, peripheral punctate lesions, and shortened axial-length. A tritan-axis color vision deficit was seen in three of six (50%) of ARB patients. Attempts to distinguish recessively-inherited ARB and dominantly-inherited VMD genotypically, by variant frequency and residue location, did not yield significant differences. Literature meta-analysis with principle component analysis of clinical features demonstrated a spectrum of disease with arVMD falling between adVMD and ARB.

Conclusions

This study suggests that arVMD is part of a continuum of autosomal recessive and dominant BEST1-related retinopathies. Detailed clinical and molecular assessments of this cohort and the literature are corroborated by unsupervised analysis, highlighting the overlapping heterogeneity among BEST1-associated clinical diagnoses. Tritan-axis color vision deficit is a previously unreported finding associated with ARB.

A novel variant of autosomal recessive best vitelliform macular dystrophy and management of early-onset complications

To report an adult with autosomal recessive Best vitelliform macular dystrophy with a new homozygous BEST1 mutation, the management of a cystoid macular edema with intravitreal aflibercept in the proband, and the findings in the parents, carriers of heterozygous BEST1 mutations. A 28-year-old female presented with blurry andreduced vision in her both eyes with bilateral vitelliform macular lesions. The patient's parents were also examined. Examinations included electrooculogram (EOGs), imaging studies, and BEST1 gene testing. Interventions included treatment with intravitreal aflibercept for both eyes. The patient presented with visual acuity of 20/20 OD 20/30 OS, RPE changes, multifocal subretinal yellowish deposits resembling vitelliform deposits and subretinal fluids. Cystoid macular edema developed after one month, causing vision reduction (20/28 OD 20/30 OS). Visual acuity recovered to 20/20 OU after serial intravitreal aflibercept injections. The proband showed subnormal EOG Arden ratios. Molecular testing showed the homozygous missense variant c.695T>G p. (IIe232Ser) In exon 6 of the BEST1 mutations and to the best of our knowledge, this variant, which was confirmed by conventional Sanger sequencing, has neither been annotated in databases nor been described in the literature so for (Human Genome Molecular Database 2018.1). In the heterozygous parents, EOGs were subnormal, and minimal autofluorescence changes were seen.

Clinical Heterogeneity in Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy with Biallelic Mutations in the BEST1 Gene

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) has been reported as clinically heterogeneous. Eighteen patients (mean age: 22.5 years; 15 unrelated families) underwent ophthalmological examination, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Molecular genetic testing of the BEST1 gene was conducted by the chain-terminating dideoxynucleotide Sanger methodology. Onset of symptoms (3 to 50 years of age) and best-corrected visual acuity (0.02–1.0) were highly variable. Ophthalmoscopic and retinal imaging defined five phenotypes. Phenotype I presented with single or confluent yellow lesions at the posterior pole and midperiphery, serous retinal detachment, and intraretinal cystoid spaces. In phenotype II fleck-like lesions were smaller and extended to the far periphery. Phenotype III showed a widespread continuous lesion with sharp peripheral demarcation. Single (phenotype IV) or multifocal (phenotype V) vitelliform macular dystrophy-like lesions were observed as well. Phenotypes varied within families and in two eyes of one patient. In addition, OCT detected hyperreflective foci (13/36 eyes) and choroidal excavation (11/36). Biallelic mutations were identified in each patient, six of which have not been reported so far [c.454C>T/p.(Pro152Ser), c.620T>A/p.(Leu207His), c.287_298del/p.(Gln96_Asn99del), c.199_200del/p.(Leu67Valfs*164), c.524del/p.(Ser175Thrfs*19), c.590_615del/p.(Leu197Profs*26)]. BEST1-associated ARB presents with a variable age of onset and clinical findings, that can be categorized in 5 clinical phenotypes. Hyperreflective foci and choroidal excavation frequently develop as secondary manifestations.

Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy: Clinical Features, Natural History, and Genetic Findings in Preparation for Clinical Trials

Purpose

To investigate the clinical course, genetic findings, and phenotypic spectrum of autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) in a large cohort of children and adults.

Design

Retrospective case series.

Participants

Patients with a detailed clinical phenotype consistent with ARB, biallelic likely disease-causing sequence variants in the BEST1 gene, or both identified at a single tertiary referral center.

Methods

Review of case notes, retinal imaging (color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, OCT), electrophysiologic assessment, and molecular genetic testing.

Main Outcome Measures

Visual acuity (VA), retinal imaging, and electrophysiologic changes over time.

Results

Fifty-six eyes of 28 unrelated patients were included. Compound heterozygous variants were detected in most patients (19/27), with 6 alleles recurring in apparently unrelated individuals, the most common of which was c.422G→A, p.(Arg141His; n = 4 patients). Mean presenting VA was 0.52 ± 0.36 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), and final VA was 0.81 ± 0.75 logMAR (P = 0.06). The mean rate of change in VA was 0.05 ± 0.13 logMAR/year. A significant change in VA was detected in patients with a follow-up of 5 years or more (n = 18) compared with patients with a follow-up of 5 years or less (n = 10; P = 0.001). Presence of subretinal fluid and vitelliform material were early findings in most patients, and this did not change substantially over time. A reduction in central retinal thickness was detected in most eyes (80.4%) over the course of follow-up. Many patients (10/26) showed evidence of generalized rod and cone system dysfunction. These patients were older (P < 0.001) and had worse VA (P = 0.02) than those with normal full-field electroretinography results.

Conclusions

Although patients with ARB are presumed to have no functioning bestrophin channels, significant phenotypic heterogeneity is evident. The clinical course is characterized by a progressive loss of vision with a slow rate of decline, providing a wide therapeutic window for anticipated future treatment strategies.

IMAGING OF VITELLIFORM MACULAR LESIONS USING POLARIZATION-SENSITIVE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY

PURPOSE

To examine the involvement of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in the presence of vitelliform macular lesions (VML) in Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD), autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy, and adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT).

METHODS

A total of 35 eyes of 18 patients were imaged using a PS-OCT system and blue light fundus autofluorescence imaging. Pathogenic mutations in the BEST1 gene, 3 of which were new, were detected in all patients with BVMD and autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy.

RESULTS

Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography showed a characteristic pattern in all three diseases with nondepolarizing material in the subretinal space consistent with the yellowish VML seen on funduscopy with a visible RPE line below it. A focal RPE thickening was seen in 26 eyes under or at the edge of the VML. Retinal pigment epithelium thickness outside the VML was normal or mildly thinned in patients with BVMD and adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration but was diffusely thinned or atrophic in patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy. Patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy showed sub-RPE fibrosis alongside the subretinal VML. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography was more reliable in assessing the localization and the integrity of the RPE than spectral domain OCT alone. On spectral domain OCT, identification of the RPE was not possible in 19.4% of eyes. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography allowed for definite identification of the location of VML in respect to the RPE in all eyes, since it provides a tissue-specific contrast.

CONCLUSION

Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography confirms in vivo the subretinal location of VML and is useful in the assessment of RPE integrity.

Clinical and Genetic Findings of Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy (ARB)

Mutations in BEST1 cause several phenotypes including autosomal dominant (AD) Best vitelliform macular dystrophy type 2 (BVMD), AD vitreo-retino-choroidopathy (ADVIRC), and retinitis pigmentosa-50 (RP50). A rare subtype of Bestrophinopathy exists with biallelic mutations in BEST1. Its frequency is estimated to be 1/1,000,000 individuals. Here we report 6 families and searched for a genotype-phenotype correlation. All patients were referred due to reduced best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ranging from 0.1/10 to 3/10. They all showed vitelliform lesions located at the macula, sometimes extending into the midperiphery, along the vessels and the optic disc. Onset of the disease varied from the age of 3 to 25 years. Electrooculogram (EOG) revealed reduction in the EOG light rise in all patients. Molecular analysis revealed previously reported mutations p.(E35K);(E35K), p.(L31M);(L31M), p.(R141H);(A195V), p.(R202W);(R202W), and p.(Q220*);(Q220*) in five families. One family showed a novel mutation: p.(E167G);(E167G). All mutations were heterozygous in the parents. In one family, heterozygous children showed various reductions in the EOG light rise and autofluorescent deposits. Autosomal recessive Bestrophinopathy (ARB), although rare, can be recognized by its phenotype and should be validated by molecular analysis. Genotype-phenotype correlations are difficult to establish and will require the analysis of additional cases.

Diffuse Outer Layer Opacification: A Novel Finding in Patients With Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy

PURPOSE

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) is a rare inherited retinal dystrophy resulted from mutations in bestrophin-1 (BEST1) which affect functioning of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Descriptions of disease findings in patients with ARB to date have focused only on macular changes. In this case series, we report previously undescribed mid-peripheral retinal changes occurring in 4 patients with ARB.

DESIGN

Case series.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective review of medical records from Mayo Clinic patients with ARB was performed. Imaging reviewed include fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiography. Demographic information and disease progression were noted.

RESULTS

4 affected patients from 3 families were identified. All 4 patients were female, and mean age was 12.5 years (range 5-19 years). Diffuse mid-peripheral whitening was consistently noted on fundus photography. Concomitant OCT imaging demonstrated areas of hyperreflectivity in the photoreceptor outer segment layer in areas corresponding to whitening seen on fundus photography. In 1 patient who was followed for 12 years, this finding persisted. Subretinal fluid was also consistently present. Other pathologic imaging findings observed in each patient were in agreement with previous reports of ARB.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first descriptive report of pathologic findings occurred beyond the posterior pole in patients with ARB. These mid-peripheral retinal changes potentially imply that the entirety of the RPE is affected by mutations in BEST1, as also suggested by previous electro-oculogram (EOG) findings. Such implications will be important when developing treatment trials, as past trials have focused only on the posterior pole of the RPE.

Novel Missense Mutations in BEST1 Are Associated with Bestrophinopathies in Lebanese Patients

To identify Bestrophin 1 (BEST1) causative mutations in six Lebanese patients from three families, of whom four had a presumed clinical diagnosis of autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) and two showed a phenotype with a single vitelliform lesion, patients were subjected to standard ophthalmic examinations. In addition, BEST1 exons and their flanking regions were amplified and sequenced by Sanger sequencing. Co-segregation and detailed bio-informatic analyses were performed. Clinical examination results were consistent with ARB diagnosis for all index patients showing multifocal vitelliform lesions and a markedly reduced light peak in the electrooculogram, including the two patients with a single vitelliform lesion. In all cases, most likely disease-causing BEST1 mutations co-segregated with the phenotype. The ARB cases showed homozygous missense variants (M1, c.209A>G, p.(Asp70Gly) in exon 3, M2, c.1403C>T; p.(Pro468Leu) in exon 10 and M3, c.830C>T, p.(Thr277Met) in exon 7), while the two patients with a single vitelliform lesion were compound heterozygous for M1 and M2. To our knowledge, this is the first study describing mutations in Lebanese patients with bestrophinopathy, where novel biallelic BEST1 mutations associated with two phenotypes were identified. Homozygous mutations were associated with multifocal lesions, subretinal fluid, and intraretinal cysts, whereas compound heterozygous ones were responsible for a single macular vitelliform lesion.

Clinical and Mutation Analysis of Patients with Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy or Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy in Chinese Population

Mutations in the gene BEST1 usually cause bestrophinopathies, such as the rare progressive diseases Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB). This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with BVMD or ARB carrying BEST1 mutations. A total of 12 probands including 9 patients with a clinical diagnosis of BVMD and 3 patients with a clinical diagnosis of ARB were recruited for genetics analysis. All patients underwent detailed ophthalmic examination. All coding exons of the BEST1 gene were screened by PCR-based DNA sequencing. Programs of PolyPhen-2, SIFT, and MutationTaster were used to analyze the potential pathogenicity of the mutations in BEST1. In the 9 unrelated patients with BVMD, one heterozygous BEST1 mutation was revealed in 8 patients and two compound heterozygous mutations in 1 patient. In the 3 unrelated patients with ARB, two compound heterozygous mutations were revealed in 2 patients and three compound heterozygous mutations in 1 patient. Molecular analyses identified a total of 15 mutations, including 3 novel mutations (c.424A>G p.S142G, c.436G>A p.A146T, and c.155T>C p.L52P). Antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs were given to two affected eyes, especially those also exhibiting choroidal neovascularization (CNV), and no serious adverse events occurred. Our study indicates that there is wide genotypic and phenotypic variability in patients with BVMD or ARB in China. The screening of BEST1 gene is significant for the precise diagnosis of BVMD and ARB.

Next generation sequencing identifies novel disease-associated BEST1 mutations in Bestrophinopathy patients

Bestinopathies are a spectrum of retinal disorders associated with mutations in BEST1 including autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) and autosomal dominant Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD). We applied whole-exome sequencing on four unrelated Indian families comprising eight affected and twelve unaffected individuals. We identified five mutations in BEST1, including p.Tyr131Cys in family A, p.Arg150Pro in family B, p.Arg47His and p.Val216Ile in family C and p.Thr91Ile in family D. Among these, p.Tyr131Cys, p.Arg150Pro and p.Val216Ile have not been previously reported. Further, the inheritance pattern of BEST1 mutations in the families confirmed the diagnosis of ARB in probands in families A, B and C, while the inheritance of heterozygous BEST1 mutation in family D (p.Thr91Ile) was suggestive of BVMD. Interestingly, the ARB families A and B carry homozygous mutations while family C was a compound heterozygote with a mutation in an alternate BEST1 transcript isoform, highlighting a role for alternate BEST1 transcripts in bestrophinopathy. In the BVMD family D, the heterozygous BEST1 mutation found in the proband was also found in the asymptomatic parent, suggesting an incomplete penetrance and/or the presence of additional genetic modifiers. Our report expands the list of pathogenic BEST1 genotypes and the associated clinical diagnosis.

BEST1 gene therapy corrects a diffuse retina-wide microdetachment modulated by light exposure

One of the most common forms of monogenic macular degeneration worldwide is caused by dominant or recessive bestrophinopathies associated with mutations in the BEST1 gene. Disease expression is known to start with a retina-wide electrophysiological defect leading to localized vitelliform and atrophic lesions and vision loss. To develop lasting therapies for this incurable disease, there is a need for greater understanding of the early pathophysiology before lesion formation. Here we find that the loss of retinal pigment epithelium apical microvilli and resulting microdetachment of the retina represent the earliest features of canine bestrophinopathies. We show that retinal light exposure expands, and dark adaptation contracts, the microdetachments. Subretinal adeno-associated virus-based gene therapy corrects both the vitelliform lesions and the light-modulated microdetachments.

Mutations in the BEST1 gene cause detachment of the retina and degeneration of photoreceptor (PR) cells due to a primary channelopathy in the neighboring retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells. The pathophysiology of the interaction between RPE and PR cells preceding the formation of retinal detachment remains not well-understood. Our studies of molecular pathology in the canine BEST1 disease model revealed retina-wide abnormalities at the RPE-PR interface associated with defects in the RPE microvillar ensheathment and a cone PR-associated insoluble interphotoreceptor matrix. In vivo imaging demonstrated a retina-wide RPE–PR microdetachment, which contracted with dark adaptation and expanded upon exposure to a moderate intensity of light. Subretinal BEST1 gene augmentation therapy using adeno-associated virus 2 reversed not only clinically detectable subretinal lesions but also the diffuse microdetachments. Immunohistochemical analyses showed correction of the structural alterations at the RPE–PR interface in areas with BEST1 transgene expression. Successful treatment effects were demonstrated in three different canine BEST1 genotypes with vector titers in the 0.1-to-5E11 vector genomes per mL range. Patients with biallelic BEST1 mutations exhibited large regions of retinal lamination defects, severe PR sensitivity loss, and slowing of the retinoid cycle. Human translation of canine BEST1 gene therapy success in reversal of macro- and microdetachments through restoration of cytoarchitecture at the RPE–PR interface has promise to result in improved visual function and prevent disease progression in patients affected with bestrophinopathies.

Novel Presenting Phenotype in a Child With Autosomal Dominant Best's Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy

Best's macular dystrophy (BMD) usually manifests with visual failure in the first or second decade of life; however, there is a large variability in expressivity of the disease, and some patients have no manifestation other than a pathological electro-oculogram (EOG). Autosomal dominant Best's vitelliform macular dystrophy (AD-BVMD) has a very specific phenotype that varies with the stage of the disease. In recent years, the authors have seen description of another clinical entity known as autosomal recessive BMD. Herein, the authors describe a 5-year-old girl referred from a peripheral hospital for investigation with a positive family history of BMD. Clinical findings included best-corrected visual acuity of 0.325 and 0.300 in the right and left eyes, respectively, by Sonksen logMar test, full color vision, normal orthoptic examination, and a small degree of hyperopia consistent with age. Macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed intraretinal fluid cysts and EOG showed reduced Arden ratio. Genetic testing was done for the proband and her father, who were found to be heterozygous for c.37C>T p. (Arg13Cys). The proband's younger sister will be reviewed and followed up once of age. The authors identified a new phenotype of AD-BVMD; although this is a single patient, more young children with BMD can now be scanned with the availability of hand-held OCT with better knowledge of the phenotype. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017;48:580-585.].

A unique case series of autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy exhibiting multigenerational inheritance

INTRODUCTION

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) is a retinal disease caused by biallelic mutations of the BEST1 gene. It has a variable phenotype with white flecks in the retina, multifocal yellow subretinal deposits, macular edema, choroidal neovascularization, hyperopia, and electrophysiological abnormalities. We describe a family with ARB and multigenerational inheritance.

METHODS

Three generations of a Middle Eastern family (a woman, one son, and two grandchildren) were evaluated by our ocular genetics team. Eye examinations, fundus photography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed. Genetic testing was obtained on examined patients and available relatives.

RESULTS

The proband demonstrated counting fingers vision and white flecks in the retinal periphery, with macular subretinal fluid (SRF), loss of outer photoreceptor segments, and epiretinal membrane (ERM) on OCT. Two grandchildren demonstrated decreased vision, multifocal yellow subretinal deposits, and SRF on OCT. Two grandchildren examined elsewhere were reported to be similarly affected. A son's examination was normal except for extra-macular scars (from prior toxoplasmosis) and ERM. Genetic history revealed consanguinity and testing showed homozygosity for BEST1 mutations in the proband and two grandchildren c.473G>A/c.473G>A (R218H /R218H) and heterozygosity in two unaffected sons and two unaffected daughters-in-law c.473G>A/WT (p.R218H/WT).

DISCUSSION

We present a consanguineous family of five affected individuals with ARB and four confirmed carriers. Their pedigree was consistent with dominant inheritance and incomplete penetrance. Genetic testing clarified the diagnosis and mode of inheritance. We describe the genetic findings, phenotypic variability, and recessive inheritance of an often dominantly inherited mutation as notable elements in their case.

Bestrophinopathy: An RPE-photoreceptor interface disease

Bestrophinopathies, one of the most common forms of inherited macular degenerations, are caused by mutations in the BEST1 gene expressed in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Both human and canine BEST1-linked maculopathies are characterized by abnormal accumulation of autofluorescent material within RPE cells and bilateral macular or multifocal lesions; however, the specific mechanism leading to the formation of these lesions remains unclear. We now provide an overview of the current state of knowledge on the molecular pathology of bestrophinopathies, and explore factors promoting formation of RPE-neuroretinal separations, using the first spontaneous animal model of BEST1-associated retinopathies, canine Best (cBest). Here, we characterize the nature of the autofluorescent RPE cell inclusions and report matching spectral signatures of RPE-associated fluorophores between human and canine retinae, indicating an analogous composition of endogenous RPE deposits in Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy (BVMD) patients and its canine disease model. This study also exposes a range of biochemical and structural abnormalities at the RPE-photoreceptor interface related to the impaired cone-associated microvillar ensheathment and compromised insoluble interphotoreceptor matrix (IPM), the major pathological culprits responsible for weakening of the RPE-neuroretina interactions, and consequently, formation of vitelliform lesions. These salient alterations detected at the RPE apical domain in cBest as well as in BVMD- and ARB-hiPSC-RPE model systems provide novel insights into the pathological mechanism of BEST1-linked disorders that will allow for development of critical outcome measures guiding therapeutic strategies for bestrophinopathies.

Restoration of mutant bestrophin-1 expression, localisation and function in a polarised epithelial cell model

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) is a retinopathy caused by mutations in the bestrophin-1 protein, which is thought to function as a Ca²⁺-gated Cl⁻ channel in the basolateral surface of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Using a stably transfected polarised epithelial cell model, we show that four ARB mutant bestrophin-1 proteins were mislocalised and subjected to proteasomal degradation. In contrast to the wild-type bestrophin-1, each of the four mutant proteins also failed to conduct Cl⁻ ions in transiently transfected cells as determined by whole-cell patch clamp. We demonstrate that a combination of two clinically approved drugs, bortezomib and 4-phenylbutyrate (4PBA), successfully restored the expression and localisation of all four ARB mutant bestrophin-1 proteins. Importantly, the Cl⁻ conductance function of each of the mutant bestrophin-1 proteins was fully restored to that of wild-type bestrophin-1 by treatment of cells with 4PBA alone. The functional rescue achieved with 4PBA is significant because it suggests that this drug, which is already approved for long-term use in infants and adults, might represent a promising therapy for the treatment of ARB and other bestrophinopathies resulting from missense mutations in BEST1.

Summary: Chemical chaperone 4PBA fully restores Cl⁻ conductance activity for mutant bestrophin-1 proteins associated with inherited retinal dystrophy, autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy.

Clinical and Genetic Findings of Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy in Japanese Cohort

PURPOSE

To report the clinical and genetic findings of 9 Japanese patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB).

DESIGN

Retrospective, multicenter observational case series.

METHODS

Nine ARB patients from 7 unrelated Japanese families that were examined in 3 institutions in Japan were studied. A series of ophthalmic examinations including fundus photography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence, electrooculography (EOG), electroretinography, and the results of genetic analysis were reviewed.

RESULTS

Genetic analyses identified 7 pathogenic variants in BEST1 including 2 novel variants, c.478G>C (p.A160P) and c.948+1delG. Homozygous variants were found in 4 families and compound heterozygous variants were found in 3 families. Two patients were diagnosed as ARB only after the whole exome sequencing analyses. The Arden ratio of the EOG was less than 1.5 in all 7 patients tested. Vitelliform lesions typical for Best vitelliform macular dystrophy were not seen in any of the patients. Seven patients shared some of the previously described features of ARB: subretinal deposits, extensive subretinal fluid, and cystoid macular edema (CME). However, the other 2 patients with severe retinal degeneration lacked these features. Focal choroidal excavations were present bilaterally in 2 patients. One case had a marked reduction of the CME and expansion of subretinal deposits over an 8-year of follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Japanese ARB patients had some but not all of the previously described features. Genetic analyses are essential to diagnose ARB correctly in consequence of considerable phenotypic variations.

Detailed analysis of family with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy associated with new BEST1 mutation

Purpose

To describe the clinical and genetic findings in a patient with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) and his healthy parents.

Methods

The patient and his healthy non-consanguineous parents underwent detailed ophthalmic evaluations including electro-oculography (EOG), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging. Mutation analysis of the BEST1 gene was performed by Sanger sequencing.

Results

The FAF images showed multiple spots of increased autofluorescence, and the sites of these spots corresponded to the yellowish deposits detected by ophthalmoscopy. SD-OCT showed cystoid macular changes and a shallow serous macular detachment. The Arden ratio of the EOG was markedly reduced to 1.1 in both eyes. Genetic analysis of the proband detected two sequence variants of the BEST1 gene in the heterozygous state: a novel variant c.717delG, p.V239VfsX2 and an already described c.763C>T, p.R255W variant associated with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy and ARB. The proband’s father carried the c.717delG, p.V239VfsX2 variant in the heterozygous state, and the mother carried the c.763C>T, p.R255W variant in the heterozygous state. The parents who were heterozygous for the BEST1 variants had normal visual acuity, EOG, SD-OCT, and FAF images.

Conclusions

In a truncating BEST1 mutation, the phenotype associated with ARB is most likely due to a marked decrease in the expression of BEST1 promoted by the nonsense-mediated decay surveillance mechanism, and it may depend on the position of the premature termination of the codon created.

New best1 mutations in autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy

PURPOSE

To report the ocular phenotype in patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy and carriers, and to describe novel BEST1 mutations.

METHODS

Patients with clinically suspected and subsequently genetically proven autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy underwent full ophthalmic examination and investigation with fundus autofluorescence imaging, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, electroretinography, and electrooculography. Mutation analysis of the BEST1 gene was performed through direct Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

Five affected patients from four families were identified. Mean age was 16 years (range, 6-42 years). All affected patients presented with reduced visual acuity and bilateral, hyperautofluorescent subretinal yellowish deposits within the posterior pole. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography demonstrated submacular fluid and subretinal vitelliform material in all patients. A cystoid maculopathy was seen in all but one patient. In 1 patient, the location of the vitelliform material was seen to change over a follow-up period of 3 years despite relatively stable vision. Visual acuity and fundus changes were unresponsive to topical and systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and systemic steroids. Carriers had normal ocular examinations including normal fundus autofluorescence. Three novel mutations were detected.

CONCLUSION

Three novel BEST1 mutations are described, suggesting that many deleterious variants in BEST1 resulting in haploinsufficiency are still unknown. Mutations causing autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy are mostly located outside of the exons that usually harbor vitelliform macular dystrophy-associated dominant mutations.

Biallelic Mutations in the BEST1 Gene: Additional Families with Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy

PURPOSE

To describe the genotype and phenotype of patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB), and heterozygous carriers.

METHODS

The members of three unrelated ARB families were investigated. Molecular genetic analysis was performed on 11 members of these families. Ten members were examined clinically; including visual acuity, slit-lamp examination, biomicroscopy, fundus photography, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Measurements were also made of the anterior chamber depth and axial length, and optical coherence tomography (OCT), electrooculography (EOG), and full-field electroretinography (full-field ERG) were performed. Multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) was performed on eight members of these families.

RESULTS

Two novel combinations of missense mutations in the BEST1 gene were identified: p.R141H/p.M325T in three patients with ARB in two unrelated Norwegian families, and p.R141H/p.I201T was found in an ARB patient in a Swedish family. All four patients with ARB had clinical and electrophysiological features of ARB. All the heterozygous carriers of the p.R141H mutation were clinically normal, and showed normal OCT, EOG and full-field ERG findings, but had mildly abnormal mfERG results. Only one heterozygous carrier of the p.M325T mutation was studied and he was clinically normal, showing normal OCT and full-field ERG results, but subnormal EOG and mfERG findings. The heterozygous carrier of the p.I201T mutation was clinically normal, showing normal OCT, EOG and full-field ERG results, but subnormal mfERG results.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that the two novel combinations of compound heterozygous mutations p.R141H/p.M325T and p.R141H/p.I201T in the BEST1 gene can also lead to the ARB phenotype.

Mutation analysis of BEST1 in Japanese patients with Best's vitelliform macular dystrophy

PURPOSE

To describe the clinical and genetic features of Japanese patients with Best's vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study examined 22 patients, including 16 probands from 16 families with BVMD. Comprehensive ophthalmic examinations were performed, including dilated funduscopy, full-field electroretinography (ERG) and electro-oculography (EOG). BEST1 mutation analysis was performed by Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

All 16 probands exhibited characteristic BVMD fundus appearances, abnormal EOG, and normal ERG responses with the exception of one diabetic retinopathy proband. Genetic analysis identified 12 BEST1 variants in 13 probands (81%). Of these, 10 variants (p.T2A, p.R25W, p.F80L, p.V81M, p.A195V, p.R218H, p.G222E, p.V242M, p.D304del and p.E306D) have been previously reported in BVMD, while two variants (p.S7N and p.P346H) were novel, putative disease-causing variants. Single BEST1 variants were found in 12 probands. The one proband with compound heterozygous variants (p.S7N and p.R218H) exhibited typical BVMD phenotypes (pseudohypopyon stage and vitelliruptive stage in the right and left eyes, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Twelve different variants, two of which (p.S7N and p.P346H) were novel, were identified in the 13 Japanese families with BVMD. Compound heterozygous variants were found in one proband exhibiting a typical BVMD phenotype. Our results suggest that BEST1 variants do play a large role in Japanese patients with BVMD.

Best vitelliform macular dystrophy: literature review

Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVD) is a slowly progressive form of macular dystrophy. In most cases this disease begins in childhood although sometimes it can develop in later age. The diagnosis of BVD is based on family history, clinical and electrophysiological findings. Clinical signs are variable, yet the majority of patients have a typical yellow yolk-like macular lesion in the eye fundus. Lesions are usually bilateral, but in rare cases can be unilateral. Atrophy of the macula may develop after many years. The mutations responsible for Best vitelliform macular dystrophy are found in a gene called VMD2, which encodes a transmembrane protein named bestrophin-1 (hBest1) that is a Ca2+-sensitive chloride channel. Most reported cases causing the disease are in exons 2, 4, 6 and 8 in patients with BVD. In this article we discuss the etiology of Best’s vitelliform macular dystrophy, clinical presentation, diagnostics, genetic and current treatment possibilities.

Best disease associated with macular hole

PURPOSE

To report a case of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy complicated by macular hole.

METHODS

History and clinical examination, electroretinogram, and optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

We report a case of a 20-year-old boy with progressive visual loss in his left eye. In fundus examination, there was a typical vitelliform lesion in the right eye and a macular hole in the left eye. The electroretinogram Arden ratio was <1.1 in both eyes. Optical coherence tomography revealed deposition of hyperreflective material and hyporeflective area between the junction of the inner segment and outer segment of the photoreceptors and the retinal pigment epithelium in the right eye, and large full-thickness macular hole with cystoid changes in the retinal layers in the left eye. There was no associated retinal detachment.

CONCLUSION

Although extremely rare, macular hole should be considered as a cause of the significant visual loss in patients with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy.

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy associated with angle-closure glaucoma

PURPOSE

Abnormalities in the BEST1 gene have recently been recognised as causing autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB). ARB has been noted to have a variable phenotypic presentation, distinct from that of autosomal dominant Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD). Both conditions are associated with deposits in the retina, a reduced or absent electro-oculography (EOG) light rise, and the risk of developing angle-closure glaucoma. Herein, we describe the clinical and genetic characteristics of a young male diagnosed with ARB associated with angle-closure glaucoma resulting from a novel homozygous mutation in BEST1.

METHODS

All research involved in this case adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The proband underwent slitlamp examination, retinal autofluorescence imaging and optical coherence tomography after presenting with deteriorating vision. The findings prompted genetic testing with bi-directional DNA sequencing of coding and flanking intronic regions of BEST1. The proband's family members were subsequently screened.

RESULTS

A provisional diagnosis of ARB was made based on the findings of subretinal and schitic lesions on fundoscopy and retinal imaging, together with abnormal EOG and electroretinography. Genetic testing identified a novel homozygous mutation in BEST1, c.636+1 G>A. Family members were found to carry one copy of the mutation and had no clinical or electrophysiological evidence of disease. The proband was additionally diagnosed with angle-closure glaucoma requiring topical therapy, peripheral iridotomies and phacoemulsification.

CONCLUSIONS

Phenotypic overlap, reduced penetrance, variable expressivity and the ongoing discovery of new forms of bestrophinopathies add to the difficulty in distinguishing these retinal diseases. All patients diagnosed with ARB or BVMD should be examined for narrow angles and glaucoma, given their frequent association with these conditions.

Multimodal imaging of adult-onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy

Adult-onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy (AOFVD) is a clinically heterogeneous maculopathy that may mimic other conditions and be difficult to diagnose. It is characterized by late onset, slow progression and high variability in morphologic and functional alterations. Diagnostic evaluation should include careful ophthalmoscopy and imaging studies. The typical ophthalmoscopic findings are bilateral, asymmetric, foveal or perifoveal, yellow, solitary, round to oval elevated subretinal lesions, often with central pigmentation. The lesions characteristically demonstrate increased autofluorescence and hypofluorescent lesions surrounded by irregular annular hyperfluorescence on fluorescein angiography. Optical coherence tomography studies demonstrate homogenous or heterogeneous hyperreflective material between the retinal pigment epithelium and the neurosensory retina. The visual prognosis is generally favorable, but visual loss can occur from chorioretinal atrophy and choroidal neovascularization.

Ocular phenotype analysis of a family with biallelic mutations in the BEST1 gene

PURPOSE

To investigate the genetic cause and perform a comprehensive clinical analysis of a Danish family with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy; to investigate whether Bestrophin may be expressed in normal human retina.

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical and molecular genetic analysis and immunohistochemical observational study.

METHODS

setting: National referral center. participants: A family with 5 individuals and biallelic BEST1 mutations, and enucleated eyes from 2 individuals with nonaffected retinas. observation procedures: Molecular genetic analysis included sequencing of BEST1 and co-segregation analysis. Clinical investigations included electro-oculography, full-field electroretinography, multifocal electroretinography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and fundus autofluorescence imaging. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed. main outcome measures: BEST1 mutations, imaging findings, electroretinography amplitudes, and implicit times.

RESULTS

The index case was compound heterozygous for p.A195V and a novel 15 base pair deletion leading to p.Q238L. The index case at age 10 demonstrated multifocal vitelliform changes that were hyperautofluorescent, cystoid macular edema in the inner nuclear layer, no light rise in the electro-oculography, and a reduced central but preserved peripheral retinal function by multifocal electroretinography. Full-field electroretinography demonstrated a reduced rod response and inner retina dysfunction. Retinal structure was normal in all 3 family members who carried a sequence change in BEST1. Electro-oculography light peak was reduced in both the mother and sister (heterozygous for p.Q238L). Immunohistochemistry could not confirm the presence of Bestrophin in normal human retina.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of a relatively well preserved retinal function, autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy may be a suitable first candidate, among the BEST1-related ocular conditions, for gene replacement therapy.

Differential effects of Best disease causing missense mutations on bestrophin-1 trafficking

Mutations in bestrophin-1 (Best1) cause Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD), a dominantly inherited retinal degenerative disease. Best1 is a homo-oligomeric anion channel localized to the basolateral surface of retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells. A number of Best1 mutants mislocalize in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. However, many proteins traffic differently in MDCK and RPE cells, and MDCK cells do not express endogenous Best1. Thus, effects of Best1 mutations on localization in MDCK cells may not translate to RPE cells. To determine whether BVMD causing mutations affect Best1 localization, we compared localization and oligomerization of Best1 with Best1 mutants V9M, W93C, and R218C. In MDCK cells, Best1 and Best1(R218C) were basolaterally localized. Best1(W93C) and Best1(V9M) accumulated in cells. In cultured fetal human retinal pigment epithelium cells (fhRPE) expressing endogenous Best1, Best1(R218C) and Best1(W93C) were basolateral. Best1(V9M) was intracellular. All three mutants exhibited similar fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) efficiencies to, and co-immunoprecipitated with Best1, indicating unimpaired oligomerization. When human Best1 was expressed in RPE in mouse eyes it was basolaterally localized. However, Best1(V9M) accumulated in intracellular compartments in mouse RPE. Co-expression of Best1 and Best1(W93C) in MDCK cells resulted in basolateral localization of both Best1 and Best1(W93C), but co-expression of Best1 with Best1(V9M) resulted in mislocalization of both proteins. We conclude that different mutations in Best1 cause differential effects on its localization and that this effect varies with the presence or absence of wild-type (WT) Best1. Furthermore, MDCK cells can substitute for RPE when examining the effects of BVMD causing mutations on Best1 localization if co-expressed with WT Best1.

Frequency, genotype, and clinical spectrum of best vitelliform macular dystrophy: data from a national center in Denmark

PURPOSE

To estimate the prevalence, genotype, and clinical spectrum of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (Best disease).

DESIGN

Retrospective epidemiologic and clinical and molecular genetic observational study.

METHODS

setting: National referral center. participants: Forty-five individuals diagnosed with Best disease. observation procedures: Retrospective review of patients diagnosed according to clinical findings and sequencing of BEST1. Patients with recently established molecular genetic diagnosis were followed up including multifocal electroretinography (mfERG), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging. main outcome measures:BEST1 mutations, SD-OCT and FAF findings, mfERG amplitudes, prevalence estimate of Best disease.

RESULTS

BEST1 mutations described previously in Danish patients with Best disease are reviewed. In addition, we identified a further 8 families and 1 sporadic case, in whom 6 BEST1 missense mutations were found, 4 of which are novel. The mutation c.904G>T (p.Asp302Asn) was identified in members of 4 unrelated families. Structural alterations ranged from precipitate-like alterations at the level of the photoreceptor outer segments (OS) to choroidal neovascularization. The extent of the former correlated with the reduction of retinal function. A prevalence estimate of Best disease in Denmark based on the number of diagnosed cases was 1.5 per 100 000 individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data expand the mutation spectrum of BEST1 in patients with Best disease. Alterations of the OS overlying lesions with subretinal fluid are similar to those seen in central serous retinopathy and may indicate impaired turnover of OS. Our frequency estimate confirms that Best disease is one of the most common causes of early macular degeneration.

Unilateral vitelliform phenotype in autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy

AIMS

It was the aim of this study to report on a patient in whom a novel mutation in the BEST1 gene was responsible for unilateral vitelliform phenotype in autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB).

METHODS

An 8-year-old young girl (proband) with unilateral vitelliform phenotype underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination at baseline (time of diagnosis) and 2 years later. Genomic DNA was extracted to look for BEST1 gene mutations in the patient and her parents.

RESULTS

Fundus autofluorescence imaging and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography showed unchanged findings in the right eye over the 2-year follow-up period. Conversely, both fundus autofluorescence imaging and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography showed a partial reabsorption of the hyper-autofluorescent/hyper-reflective subretinal material in the left macula over the 2-year follow-up period. On BEST1 gene analysis, the patient presented a novel mutation c.535_537delAAC (p.Asn179del) in homozygous condition; interestingly, despite the absence of parents' consanguinity, both the father and mother showed the same novel mutation in heterozygous condition.

CONCLUSION

This case of unilateral vitelliform phenotype further supports the notion that ARB represents a disease spectrum in terms of severity, age at onset and heritability.

A novel compound heterozygous mutation in the BEST1 gene causes autosomal recessive Best vitelliform macular dystrophy

PURPOSE

To determine the genetic basis of early onset autosomal recessive Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (arBVMD) in a family with three affected children.

DESIGN

Clinical and family-based genetic study.

METHODS

Seven subjects making up a family with three children affected by Best vitelliform macular dystrophy were studied. Standard ophthalmic exam with dilated ophthalmoscopy and imaging were performed in each individual. The eleven exons of BEST1 were directly sequenced.

RESULTS

All three affected children have the clinical characteristic features of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy: large macular vitelliform lesions, scattered vitelliform lesions along the arcades and in the peripheral retina, and an accumulation of serous retinal fluid. A novel compound heterozygous mutation in the BEST1 gene was found in the three affected individuals (L41P and I201T). The unaffected parents and children only harbor one heterozygous mutation.

CONCLUSION

arBVMD can be caused by the compound heterozygous mutation L41P and I201T in the BEST1 gene.

Phenotype and genotype of patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy

PURPOSE

To describe the phenotype and genotype of patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy.

METHODOLOGY

The phenotype of the subjects was described after a complete ophthalmological examination, and in various cases, ancillary testing of the visual field, optical coherent tomography, full field electroretinography and electrophysiology. Genetic analysis was carried out by screening the Bestrophin-1 (BEST1) gene for mutations by dideoxy sequencing and segregation analysis.

RESULTS

We identified three previously described mutations (Ala195Val, Leu191Pro and Arg141His) and two potentially pathogenic changes (Trp93Pro and Trp287Ter) in the Best-1 gene. Two patients carried compound heterozygous mutations, Trp93Pro/Ala195Val, and Leu191Pro/Trp287Ter. Two sisters were homozygous for an Arg141His mutation. All individuals with Best1 gene mutations had signs of maculopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations expand the limited number of phenotypes associated with mutations in the Best1 gene. Patients with compound heteroyzygous Best1 mutations developed atypical forms of Best disease. Two siblings with homozygous Arg141His mutation developed symptoms of typical Best vitelliform dystrophy while their parents had clinical features of mild maculopathy.

Molecular consequences of BEST1 gene mutations in canine multifocal retinopathy predict functional implications for human bestrophinopathies

PURPOSE

Bestrophin-1 gene (BEST1) mutations are responsible for a broad spectrum of human retinal phenotypes, jointly called bestrophinopathies. Canine multifocal retinopathy (cmr), caused by mutations in the dog gene ortholog, shares numerous phenotypic features with human BEST1-associated disorders. The purpose of this study was the assessment of molecular consequences and pathogenic outcomes of the cmr1 (C(73)T/R(25)X) premature termination and the cmr2 (G(482)A/G(161)D) missense mutation of the canine model compared with the C(87)G/Y(29)X mutation observed in human patients.

METHODS

Dogs carrying the BEST1 mutation were introduced into a breeding colony and used to produce either carrier or affected offspring. Eyes were collected immediately after euthanatization at the disease-relevant ages and were harvested for expression studies. In parallel, an in vitro cell culture model system was developed and compared with in vivo

RESULTS

RESULTS

The results demonstrate that cmr1 and human C(87)G-mutated transcripts bypass the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay machinery, suggesting the AUG proximity effect as an underlying transcriptional mechanism. The truncated protein, however, is not detectable in either species. The in vitro model accurately recapitulates transcriptional and translational expression events observed in vivo and, thus, implies loss of bestrophin-1 function in cmr1-dogs and Y(29)X-affected patients. Immunofluorescence microscopy of cmr2 mutant showed mislocalization of the protein.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular evaluation of cmr mutations in vivo and in vitro constitutes the next step toward elucidating genotype-phenotype interactions concerning human bestrophinopathies and emphasizes the importance of the canine models for studying the complexity of the BEST1 disease mechanism.

Autosomal recessive vitelliform macular dystrophy in a large cohort of vitelliform macular dystrophy patients

PURPOSE

To report 11 cases of autosomal recessive vitelliform macular dystrophy and to compare their molecular findings and phenotypic characteristics with those of patients with the more common and well-described dominant form of the disease.

METHODS

Blood samples were obtained from 435 unrelated individuals with a clinical diagnosis of vitelliform macular dystrophy and screened for mutations in the coding sequences of BEST1. Medical records and retinal photographs of selected patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

Nine of the 435 probands were found to have 2 plausible disease-causing variations in BEST1, while 198 individuals were found to have heterozygous variations compatible with autosomal dominant inheritance. Inheritance phase was determined in three of the recessive families. Six novel disease-causing mutations were identified among these recessive patients: Arg47Cys, IVS7-2A>G, IVS7+4G>A, Ile205del12ATCCTGCTCCAGAG, Pro274Arg, and Ile366delCAGGTGTGGC. Forty-four novel disease-causing mutations were identified among the patients with presumed autosomal dominant disease. The phenotype of patients with recessive alleles for BEST1 ranged from typical vitelliform lesions to extensive extramacular deposits.

CONCLUSION

The authors provide evidence that two abnormal BEST1 alleles, neither of which causes macular disease alone, can act in concert to cause early-onset vitelliform macular dystrophy.

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy: new observations on the retinal phenotype - clinical and molecular report of an Italian family

PURPOSE

To describe the genotype and phenotype in a 9-year-old boy with bilateral retinopathy.

METHODS

The patient, his healthy (by history) nonconsanguineous parents and his sister were examined by best-corrected visual acuity, matrix frequency doubling technology, monocular static field analysis, fundus autofluorescence imaging, optical coherence tomography, Ganzfeld electroretinography (ERG), pattern ERG, multifocal ERG, electro-oculography and genotyping of the BEST1 gene.

RESULTS

The patient presented with an Arden ratio of 1.25, an unremarkable ERG and fluorescent yellow deposits distributed throughout the fundus suggestive of autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB). Genotyping revealed a homozygous nonsense mutation in BEST1 (p.R200X). The parents and the sister, who were heterozygous mutation carriers, presented with normal ophthalmological function.

CONCLUSIONS

ARB is a rare retinal disorder. We contribute a novel patient report indicative of ARB, assessed by clinical examination and confirmed by genotyping of BEST1, to the short list of ARB cases in the literature.

Systematic screening of BEST1 and PRPH2 in juvenile and adult vitelliform macular dystrophies: a rationale for molecular analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate a genetic approach of BEST1 and PRPH2 screening according to age of onset, family history, and Arden ratio in patients with juvenile vitelliform macular dystrophy (VMD2) or adult-onset vitelliform macular dystrophy (AVMD), which are characterized by autofluorescent deposits.

DESIGN

Clinical, electrophysiologic, and molecular retrospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

The database of a clinic specialized in genetic sensory diseases was screened for patients with macular vitelliform dystrophy. Patients with an age of onset less than 40 years were included in the VMD2 group (25 unrelated patients), and patients with an age of onset more than 40 years were included in the AVMD group (19 unrelated patients).

METHODS

Clinical, fundus photography, and electro-oculogram (EOG) findings were reviewed. Mutation screening of BEST1 and PRPH2 genes was systematically performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Relevance of age of onset, family history, and Arden ratio were reviewed.

RESULTS

Patients with VMD2 carried a BEST1 mutation in 60% of the cases. Seven novel mutations in BEST1 (p.V9L, p.F80V, p.I73V, p.R130S, pF298C, pD302A, and p.179delN) were found. Patients with VMD2 with a positive family history or a reduced Arden ratio carried a BEST1 mutation in 70.5% of cases and in 83% if both criteria were fulfilled. Patients with AVMD carried a PRPH2 mutation in 10.5% of cases and did not carry a BEST1 mutation. The probability of finding a PRPH2 mutation increased in the case of a family history (2/5 patients). Electro-oculogram was normal in 3 of 15 patients with BEST1 mutations and reduced in the 3 patients with PRPH2 mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Age of onset is a major criterion to distinguish VMD2 from AVMD. Electro-oculogram is not as relevant because decreased or normal Arden ratios have been associated with mutations in both genes and diseases. A positive family history increased the probability of finding a mutation. BEST1 screening should be recommended to patients with an age of onset less than 40 years, and PRPH2 screening should be recommended to patients with an age of onset more than 40 years. For an onset between 30 and 40 years, PRPH2 can be screened if no mutation has been detected in BEST1.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.