1
|
Russell JA, Beverly EA, Stewart LJ, McMichael LP, Senn AB. Stunt performers' reluctance to self-report head trauma: a qualitative study. J Occup Med Toxicol 2024; 19:4. [PMID: 38297318 PMCID: PMC10832189 DOI: 10.1186/s12995-024-00401-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mild traumatic brain injuries receive voluminous attention in the research literature, but this is confined almost entirely to sports and military contexts. As an occupation, performing stunts in film, television, and entertainment places the head at high risk of repetitive impact and whiplash, but stunt performers do not enjoy the same level of healthcare supervision and access as that provided to sports participants. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate stunt performers' qualitative perceptions of reporting and management of head trauma in their industry. METHODS After giving their informed consent, 87 motion picture and television stunt performers responded to a query about their views of ways to improve how stunt performers' occupational head trauma-specifically head impacts and head whips that could cause a concussion-are reported and managed. We analyzed their responses via content and thematic analyses. Two researchers independently marked and categorized key words, phrases, and texts to identify codes that described participants' comments. They then revised, discussed, and resolved coding discrepancies through consensus to establish inter-coder reliability. Next, we identified thematic patterns that described participants' understanding of the stunt performer industry and what must change to facilitate reporting of head trauma. We derived themes from data that occurred multiple times, both within and across short answer responses. RESULTS We identified three primary themes cited by the stunt performers as needs in their industry: (1) Need to Reduce the Stigma of Reporting a Stunt-Related Injury, (2) Need to Eliminate the "Cowboy Culture," and (3) Need to Improve the Quality of the Work Environment. CONCLUSIONS Stunt performers are crucial members of a global entertainment industry valued at approximately US$100 billion annually. A large segment of the world's population consumes their work in motion pictures, television, and live entertainment. When they are given an anonymous opportunity to speak, stunt performers offer insight into and recommendations for industry changes-primarily cultural and educational in nature-that could improve their physical and mental health, career longevity, and employability when they are confronted with head trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey A Russell
- Laboratory for Science and Health in Artistic Performance, Division of Athletic Training, College of Health Sciences and Professions, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA.
- School of Applied Health Sciences and Wellness, Ohio University, Grover Center E182, 45701, Athens, Ohio, USA.
| | - Elizabeth A Beverly
- Ohio University, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, Ohio, USA
| | - Lori J Stewart
- Union of British Columbia Performers/ACTRA, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Ariana B Senn
- Laboratory for Science and Health in Artistic Performance, Division of Athletic Training, College of Health Sciences and Professions, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA
- Feld Entertainment, Inc. , Palmetto, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Karvandi E, Helmy A, Kolias AG, Belli A, Ganau M, Gomes C, Grey M, Griffiths M, Griffiths T, Griffiths P, Holliman D, Jenkins P, Jones B, Lawrence T, McLoughlin T, McMahon C, Messahel S, Newton J, Noad R, Raymont V, Sharma K, Sylvester R, Tadmor D, Whitfield P, Wilson M, Woodberry E, Parker M, Hutchinson PJ. Specialist healthcare services for concussion/mild traumatic brain injury in England: a consensus statement using modified Delphi methodology. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e077022. [PMID: 38070886 PMCID: PMC10729241 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish a consensus on the structure and process of healthcare services for patients with concussion in England to facilitate better healthcare quality and patient outcome. DESIGN This consensus study followed the modified Delphi methodology with five phases: participant identification, item development, two rounds of voting and a meeting to finalise the consensus statements. The predefined threshold for agreement was set at ≥70%. SETTING Specialist outpatient services. PARTICIPANTS Members of the UK Head Injury Network were invited to participate. The network consists of clinical specialists in head injury practising in emergency medicine, neurology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, paediatric medicine, rehabilitation medicine and sports and exercise medicine in England. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE A consensus statement on the structure and process of specialist outpatient care for patients with concussion in England. RESULTS 55 items were voted on in the first round. 29 items were removed following the first voting round and 3 items were removed following the second voting round. Items were modified where appropriate. A final 18 statements reached consensus covering 3 main topics in specialist healthcare services for concussion; care pathway to structured follow-up, prognosis and measures of recovery, and provision of outpatient clinics. CONCLUSIONS This work presents statements on how the healthcare services for patients with concussion in England could be redesigned to meet their health needs. Future work will seek to implement these into the clinical pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elika Karvandi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Adel Helmy
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Angelos G Kolias
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonio Belli
- Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mario Ganau
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Clint Gomes
- Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- UK Sports Institute, Liverpool, UK
| | - Michael Grey
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Michael Griffiths
- Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Alder-Hey Children's NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Timothy Griffiths
- Department of Cognitive Neurology, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Philippa Griffiths
- Sunderland & South Tyneside Community Acquired Brain Injury Service, Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Damian Holliman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Peter Jenkins
- Wessex Neuroscience Centre, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ben Jones
- Carnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Leeds Beckett University-Headingley Campus, Leeds, UK
- England Performance Unit, Rugby Football League Ltd, Leeds, UK
| | - Tim Lawrence
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Catherine McMahon
- Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences (MCCN), Salford Royal Infirmary, Northern Care Alliance, Liverpool, UK
| | - Shrouk Messahel
- Alder Hey Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Joanne Newton
- Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rupert Noad
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | | | - Kanchan Sharma
- Department of Neurology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, UK
| | - Richard Sylvester
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, London, UK
- Institute of Exercise and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Tadmor
- Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
- Medical, Leeds Rhinos Rugby League Club, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Mark Wilson
- Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Emma Woodberry
- Department of Neuropsychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
McLoughlin J. Concussion Rehabilitation and the Application of Ten Movement Training Principles. Cureus 2023; 15:e46520. [PMID: 37927640 PMCID: PMC10625311 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Concussion awareness continues to grow in all aspects of healthcare, including the areas of prevention, acute care, and ongoing rehabilitation. Most of the concussion research to date has focussed on the challenges around screening and diagnosing what can be a complex mix of brain impairments that overlay with additional pre-existing comorbidities. While we expect further progress in concussion diagnosis, progress also continues to be made around proactive rehabilitation, with the emergence of interventions that can enhance the recovery process, maximise function and independence with a return to study, work, and play. Traditionally, optimal multimodal assessments of concussion have treated the physical, cognitive, and psychological domains of brain injury separately, which supports diagnosis, and informs appropriate follow-up care. Due to the complex nature of brain injury, multimodal assessments direct care toward professionals from many different disciplines including medicine, physiotherapy, psychology, neuropsychology, ophthalmology, and exercise physiology. In addition, these professionals may work in different fields such as sports, neurorehabilitation, vestibular, musculoskeletal, community, vocational, and general practice clinical settings. Rehabilitation interventions for concussions employed in practice are also likely to use a blend of theoretical principles from motor control, cognitive, and psychological sciences. This scale of diversity can make information dissemination, collaboration, and innovation challenging. The Ten Movement Training Principles (MTPs) have been proposed as a usable and relevant concept to guide and support clinical reasoning in neurorehabilitation. When applied to concussion rehabilitation, these same 10 principles provide a comprehensive overview of key rehabilitation strategies for current and future practice. Future collaborations can use these training principles to support clinical and research innovations including the rapid rise of technologies in this growing field of rehabilitation practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James McLoughlin
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, AUS
| |
Collapse
|