Predictors of new bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: Analysis of data from the DRIVE and DESIRABLE studies

Safety and effectiveness of denosumab in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A 2-year post-marketing surveillance study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the 2 year safety and effectiveness of denosumab 60 mg in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice in Japan.

METHODS

This 2 year, prospective, observational cohort study included patients who initiated treatment with denosumab 60 mg for the progression of bone erosion associated with RA. Key endpoints were adverse drug reactions (ADRs), progression of bone erosion, and 28-joint Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the risk factors for ADRs and the progression of bone erosion.

RESULTS

In the safety analysis set (n = 1239), the incidence of ADRs was 3.0%; the most common ADRs were hypocalcaemia (1.2%) and osteonecrosis of jaw-related events (0.6%). A history of any drug allergy was a statistically significant risk factor associated with the occurrence of ADRs. In the effectiveness analysis set (n = 815), the incidence of progression of bone erosion was 8.7%. Steinbrocker stage and initial steroid dose were statistically significant risk factors associated with the progression of bone erosion.

CONCLUSION

Denosumab demonstrated safety and effectiveness over a 2 year period in RA patients without any new safety concerns.

Intensive treatment for the progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis patients with low disease activity or remission

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of intensive treatment on joint damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) showing progression of joint damage and low disease activity or remission.

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients who had change in the van der Heijde modified total Sharp score (TSS) of >0.5 points at baseline when compared with the score 1 year ago were enrolled and categorized into two groups to receive intensive (intensive group) or current (current group) treatment. The intensive and current groups were compared for change (Δ) from baseline to 1 year of erosion score, joint space narrowing score, and TSS.

RESULTS

The ΔTSS values at 1 year in the intensive and current groups were 0.67 ± 1.09 and 1.79 ± 1.70, respectively (P < 0.001). In the intensive and current groups, the ΔTSS ≤ 0.5 at 1 year were 66.7% and 32.4%, respectively (P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

The intensive treatment was more effective at suppressing joint damage than the current treatment. The progression of joint damage is an important target to consider for intensive treatment.

Prevention of Radiographic Progression in Higher-Risk Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Filgotinib in Phase III Studies: Narrative Review of Post Hoc Analyses

Filgotinib is an oral preferential Janus kinase 1 inhibitor that demonstrated significant reductions in radiographic progression, with an acceptable tolerability and safety profile, vs placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR; FINCH 1) and vs MTX in MTX-naïve patients with RA (FINCH 3). International treatment guidelines identify multiple poor prognostic factors (PPFs) associated with worse disease outcomes among patients with RA. However, questions remain both about the clinical utility of considering PPFs and about which PPFs should drive treatment decisions. Additionally, the role of radiographic findings in clinical practice continues to be discussed and to evolve. This review examines radiographic results from post hoc analyses of phase 3 trials of filgotinib that examined subgroups with 4 PPFs or with baseline estimated rapid radiographic progression (e-RRP). In MTX groups, there were trends toward greater progression among patients with 4 PPFs or e-RRP, suggesting these subgroups may comprise a higher-risk population. Results show general consistency for the efficacy of filgotinib 200 mg plus MTX vs placebo plus MTX/MTX monotherapy on radiographic assessments, including change from baseline in modified total Sharp score and proportions without radiographic progression, even among MTX-IR or MTX-naïve patients with 4 PPFs or e-RRP who may be at higher risk of bone damage. Multivariate analysis identified multiple factors associated with baseline e-RRP status. This summary of the current understanding of benefits associated with filgotinib on radiographic progression and the relevance of baseline factors to these benefits may help inform treatment decisions for patients facing high risk of radiographic progression.

How do symptoms of each joint contribute to global pain, disease activity and functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis?-A comprehensive association study using a large cohort

BACKGROUND

Established assessment tools for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including disease activity scores (DASs), disease activity indexes (DAIs), visual analog scales (VASs), and health assessment questionnaires (HAQs), are widely used. However, comparative associations between joint involvement and disease status assessment tools have rarely been investigated.

METHODS

We included a dataset of 4016 patients from a large RA cohort from 2012 to 2019. The tenderness and swelling of each joint were counted as a symptom, with 70 and 68 affected joints throughout the body, respectively. The relative contribution of various joints to the disease status assessment tools, VAS scores, and functional disability indexes was analyzed using multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

The wrist showed the most significant contribution overall, especially in DASs and VASs, while the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints made significant contributions to DASs and DAIs, but not to VASs and HAQs. The shoulder and the elbow significantly contributed to HAQs, but only the shoulder did to the VASs. The knee universally contributed to all of the tools, but the ankle played a minor but important role in most assessment tools, especially in HAQs. Similar but different contribution ratios were found between the sets of DASs, DAIs, VASs, or HAQs.

CONCLUSIONS

Each joint makes a unique contribution to these assessment tools. The improvement or aggravation of symptoms in each joint affects the assessment tools in different manners.

Role of denosumab in bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by systemic inflammation and synovitis which evolve into joint destruction and deformity. Bone abnormalities are represented by marginal bone erosions and iuxta-articular and generalized osteoporosis. Overactivation of osteoclasts along with dysregulation of osteoblasts are the key events. Bone resorption is mediated by the receptor activator of nuclear factor (NF)-κB (RANK) ligand (RANK-L), responsible for the differentiation, proliferation, and activation of osteoclasts. RANK-L binds its receptor RANK, localized on the surface of preosteoclasts and mature osteoclasts promoting osteoclastogenesis. High levels of RANK-L were demonstrated in active RA patients. Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, binds RANK-L and suppresses the RANK-RANK-L signaling pathway leading to the inhibition of osteoclastogenesis. A retrospective analysis of published studies such as clinical trials evidenced the efficacy of denosumab in preventing bone erosion progression in RA patients. Key messages Key questions to answer in future include the following: Could denosumab be associated with other biologic therapies in RA patients? Could denosumab block the progression of bone damage in RA? Could denosumab be used for the prevention of bone erosion in RA?

Biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease, symmetrically affecting the small joints. Biomarkers are tools that can be used in the diagnosis and monitoring of RA.

AIM

To systematically explore the role of the biomarkers: C-reactive protein (CRP), rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-cyclic citrullinated protein (Anti-CCP), 14-3-3η protein, and the multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) score for the diagnosis and treatment of RA.

METHODS

A systematic review of the English literature using four different databases was carried out.

RESULTS

CRP >7.1 mg/L predicted poor conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) outcome in RA. Anti-CCP, CRP ≥0.3 mg/dL, and RF predicted bone erosion and cartilage destruction. Combination of high 14-3-3η protein with RF and CRP improved the prediction of rapid erosion progression (REP). Anti-CCP was not associated with disease activity but was associated with increased radiographic damage (r = 0.46, p = 0.048). RF was not associated with joint damage but correlated with ultrasound-detected bone erosion. The 14-3-3η protein significantly correlated with inflammation, bone rremodeling, and osteoporosis in RA patients (p < 0.05). In addition, the 14-3-3η protein positively correlated with RA duration (p = 0.003), disease aactivity, and positive RF (p = 0.025) and it distinguished early from established RA. Early MBDA scores correlated with later response in disease activity after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment (p < 0.05). The MBDA score was able to differentiate between small differences in disease activity, predicted remission over 1-year pperiod, and was a strong predictor of radiographic progression of RA.

CONCLUSION

The investigated biomarkers are helpful tools in clinical practice for diagnosis, monitoring of treatment, and predicting prognosis in RA patients. However, further research is still required to investigate novel biomarkers for the pre-treatment selection of potentially responsive patients before starting therapy for a precision medicine in this area.

Post hoc analysis of clinical characteristics of patients with radiographic progression in a Japanese phase 3 trial of peficitinib and methotrexate treatment (RAJ4)

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of peficitinib in reducing joint damage and predictive factors affecting treatment response in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis used data from a placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (RAJ4) of peficitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate. Erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) were assessed at baseline and at Week 28/early termination of treatment using the van der Heijde-modified Sharp method. A univariate logistic regression analysis of change from baseline in a modified total Sharp score identified predictive factors with significant treatment interaction; the effects of these factors on treatment response were further evaluated using a multivariate model.

RESULTS

The analyses included 481 patients. For most joint groups, peficitinib demonstrated a reduced change from baseline at Week 28/early termination in erosion and JSN scores versus placebo; a numerically greater effect was observed with peficitinib 150 mg versus 100 mg. Baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) and prednisolone dose were identified as clinically significant negative predictive factors: the treatment effect decreased as CRP or prednisolone dose increased for both peficitinib doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Peficitinib 100 mg and 150 mg reduced joint damage versus placebo, across almost all joint groups. Higher baseline CRP and/or prednisolone dose were associated with reduced peficitinib efficacy.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02305849.

Increasing trend of radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis in rheumatoid arthritis patients before total knee arthroplasty

To investigate the trend and factors related to the occurrence of osteoarthritis (OA)-like features on knee radiographs of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the recent decades. To classify antero-posterior knee radiographs into 'RA' and 'OA-like RA' groups, a deep learning model was developed by training the network using knee radiographs of end-stage arthropathy in RA patients obtained during 2002-2005 and in primary OA patients obtained during 2007-2009. We used this model to categorize 796 knee radiographs, which were recorded in RA patients before TKA during 2006-2020, into 'OA-like RA' and 'RA' groups. The annual ratio of 'OA-like RA' was investigated. Moreover, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with the classification as OA-like RA using clinical data from 240 patients. The percentage of 'OA-like RA' had significant increasing trend from 20.9% in 2006 to 67.7% in 2020. Higher body mass index, use of biologics, and lower level of C-reactive protein were identified as independent factors for 'OA-like RA'. An increasing trend of knee radiographs with OA-like features was observed in RA patients in the recent decades, which might be attributed to recent advances in pharmacotherapy.

A Narrative Literature Review Comparing the Key Features of Musculoskeletal Involvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Although the clinical approach to the management of musculoskeletal manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is often similar to that of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there are distinct differences in immunopathogenesis, structural and imaging phenotypes and therapeutic evidence. Additionally, there are few published comparisons of these diseases. The objective of this narrative literature review is to compare the immunopathogenesis, structural features, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) studies and management of joint manifestations in RA and SLE. We highlight the key similarities and differences between the two diseases. Overall, the literature evaluated indicates that synovitis and radiographical progression are the key features in RA, while inflammation without swelling, tendinitis and tenosynovitis are more prominent features in SLE. In addition, the importance of defining patients with RA by the presence or absence of autoantibodies and categorizing patients with SLE by synovitis detected by musculoskeletal ultrasound and by structural phenotype (non-deforming, non-erosive arthritis, Jaccoud’s arthropathy and ‘Rhupus’) with respect to joint manifestations will also be discussed. An increased understanding of the joint manifestations in RA and SLE may inform evidence-based clinical decisions for both diseases.

Inhibition of bone erosion, determined by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT), in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving a conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD) plus denosumab vs csDMARD therapy alone: an open-label, randomized, parallel-group study

BACKGROUND

This exploratory study compared the inhibition of bone erosion progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with a conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD) plus denosumab versus csDMARD therapy alone and investigated the effects of denosumab on bone micro-architecture and other bone-related parameters using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT).

METHODS

In this open-label, randomized, parallel-group study, patients with RA undergoing treatment with a csDMARD were randomly assigned (1:1) to continue csDMARD therapy alone or to continue csDMARDs with denosumab (60-mg subcutaneous injection once every 6 months) for 12 months. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the depth of bone erosion, measured by HR-pQCT, in the second and third metacarpal heads at 6 months after starting treatment. Exploratory endpoints were also evaluated, and adverse events (AEs) were monitored for safety.

RESULTS

In total, 46 patients were enrolled, and 43 were included in the full analysis set (csDMARDs plus denosumab, N = 21; csDMARD therapy alone, N = 22). Most patients were female (88.4%), and the mean age was 65.3 years. The adjusted mean (95% confidence interval) change from baseline in the depth of bone erosion, measured by HR-pQCT, in the 2-3 metacarpal heads at 6 months was - 0.57 mm (- 1.52, 0.39 mm) in the csDMARDs plus denosumab group vs - 0.22 mm (- 0.97, 0.53 mm) in the csDMARD therapy alone group (between-group difference: - 0.35 mm [- 1.00, 0.31]; P = 0.2716). Similar results were shown for the adjusted mean between-group difference in the width and volume of bone erosion of the 2-3 metacarpal heads. Significant improvements in bone micro-architecture parameters were shown. The incidence of AEs and serious AEs was similar between the csDMARDs plus denosumab and the csDMARD therapy alone groups (AEs: 52.2% vs 56.5%; serious AEs: 4.3% vs 8.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the addition of denosumab to csDMARDs did not find statistically significant improvements in bone erosion after 6 months of treatment, numerical improvements in these parameters suggest that the addition of denosumab to csDMARDs may be effective in inhibiting the progression of bone erosion and improving bone micro-architecture.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000030575. Japan Registry for Clinical Trials, jRCTs071180018.

Impact of denosumab discontinuation on changes in bone mineral density and bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis patients

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and erosion after denosumab discontinuation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients without osteoporosis who participated in the DESIRABLE study.

METHODS

This multicentre observational study consisted of a prediscontinuation visit (date of final assessment in DESIRABLE) and a postdiscontinuation visit (2.5 years after the last administered dose of denosumab). Percentage change in lumbar spine (LS) BMD from baseline was assessed as the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were enrolled. The percentage change in LS BMD decreased to baseline levels at the postdiscontinuation visit. Compared with baseline, C-telopeptide of type I collagen levels increased after denosumab discontinuation but most patients had levels within the reference range. Bone erosion scores were not significantly different between the on-treatment period and after denosumab discontinuation (p = .0666) but there was a numerical increase postdiscontinuation. The progression in bone erosion score was significantly reduced in patients whose disease activity was in remission versus those not in remission (p = .0195).

CONCLUSIONS

In RA patients without osteoporosis, denosumab discontinuation can be explored while considering patient background factors (disease activity and risk of fracture) and accounting for progression of bone erosion and LS BMD decrease after withdrawal.

Identifying the preferable rheumatoid arthritis subgroups for intervention with the anti-RANKL antibody denosumab to reduce progression of joint destruction

OBJECTIVES

To clarify which rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients benefit most from the anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand antibody denosumab to reduce the progression of joint destruction.

METHODS

We pooled patient data from the 12-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled DRIVE (phase II) and DESIRABLE (phase III) studies. In DRIVE, concomitant treatment was limited to methotrexate, salazosulfapyridine and bucillamine. In DESIRABLE, patients could receive any disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. RA patients were randomised to denosumab 60 mg every 6 months (Q6M), every 3 months (Q3M) or placebo. Efficacy was assessed by van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score (mTSS), bone erosion score (ES) and joint space narrowing score (JSNS). Change in mTSS was assessed in subgroups stratified by risk factors for radiographic damage if the interaction factor was significant.

RESULTS

The pooled analysis included 909 patients. Denosumab reduced worsening of mTSS (mean (SD)) at 12 months in the Q6M (0.88 (3.30), p=0.0024) and Q3M (0.66 (2.16), p=0.0002) groups versus placebo (1.50 (3.73)). This reduction in mTSS progression was due to the change in ES (Q6M, 0.44 (1.89), p=0.0006; Q3M, 0.20 (0.86), p<0.0001) versus placebo (0.98 (2.54)); no effect was observed on JSNS. Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies, glucocorticoid use and baseline ES showed a significant interaction. Denosumab was particularly effective in patients who were anti-CCP antibody positive (p<0.05). Changes in mTSS versus placebo were observed in all denosumab dose groups, regardless of glucocorticoid use and baseline ES.

CONCLUSIONS

Denosumab broadly reduced the progression of joint destruction in RA patients with risk factors for radiographic damage such as especially anti-CCP antibody positivity.

A retrospective analysis of the relationship between anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and the effectiveness of abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis patients

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of abatacept (ABA) by anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (ACPA) status on disease activity as well as radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical settings. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from a multicenter registry. Data from a total of 553 consecutive RA patients treated with intravenous ABA were included. We primarily compared the status of disease activity (SDAI) and radiographic progression (van der Heijde modified total Sharp score: mTSS) between the ACPA-negative (N = 107) and ACPA-positive (N = 446) groups. 'ACPA positive' was defined as ≥ 13.5 U/mL of anti-CCP antibody. Baseline characteristics between groups were similar. The proportion of patients who achieved low disease activity (LDA; SDAI ≤ 11) at 52 weeks was significantly higher in the ACPA-positive group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified ACPA positivity as an independent predictor for achievement of LDA at 52 weeks. Drug retention rate at 52 weeks estimated by the Kaplan-Meier curve was significantly higher in the ACPA-positive group. Achievement rate of structural remission (ΔmTSS ≤ 0.5) at 52 weeks was similar between groups. ABA treatment demonstrated a significantly higher clinical response and higher drug retention rate in ACPA-positive patients. Progression of joint destruction was similar between the ACPA-negative and ACPA-positive groups. Close attention should be paid to joint destruction even in patients showing a favorable response to ABA, especially when the ACPA status is positive.