Efficacy and safety of canakinumab in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: 48-week results from an open-label phase III study in Japanese patients

Efficacy and safety of canakinumab in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, the first Chinese experience

BACKGROUND

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a severe form of juvenile arthritis that is characterized by chronic joint inflammation and systemic symptoms such as fever, rash, and organ involvement. Anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody tocilizumab is an effective treatment. However, some patients still experience persisting or recurrent symptoms and the real-world effectiveness of canakinumab in Chinese patients with sJIA has never been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of canakinumab in Chinese patients with sJIA using real-world data.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on children with active sJIA. Clinical features, laboratory data, corticosteroid dosage, and adverse events (AEs) were collected at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks after initiating canakinumab treatment.

RESULTS

Seven female and four male patients were included in the study. All patients had previously been treated with tocilizumab and were administered canakinumab for 12.4 ± 3.4 months. Notably, significant improvements were observed in both clinical signs and symptoms as well as laboratory indicators. Four children under corticosteroid treatment were able to successfully discontinue their corticosteroid therapy: one at week 4, two at week 12, and one at week 24. Notably, there was a significant reduction in the number of tender and swollen joints (P = 0.0059) as well as the systemic juvenile arthritis disease activity score (P < 0.0001). The most common AE was infection, but no patients experienced serious AEs. No cases of macrophage activation syndrome or death were reported during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Canakinumab was found to be potentially efficacious and safe in Chinese patients with sJIA. No new AEs were observed with canakinumab treatment.

Long-term efficacy and safety of canakinumab in the treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Japanese patients: Results from an open-label Phase III study

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to report the efficacy and safety of canakinumab treatment in Japanese patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) over a 48-week study period.

METHODS

Patients were administered canakinumab 4 mg/kg (maximum dose 300 mg) every 4 weeks, with no dose adjustments. The key outcome measures included adapted American College of Rheumatology paediatric (aACR pedi) 30/50/70/90/100 response, proportion of patients with inactive disease, and corticosteroid (CS) tapering.

RESULTS

In total, 16/19 (84.2%) patients received canakinumab for ≥96 weeks reaching end-of-study (EOS) visit without premature discontinuation. Regardless of the level of joint involvement at baseline, high aACR pedi responses were observed throughout the study; at the EOS, aACR pedi 90/100 response rates were 84.2%/63.2%, respectively. The proportion of patients who successfully tapered CSs at EOS was 66.7% (12/18), of which 10 patients were steroid-free. The most common adverse events were infections (238.3 events/100 patient-years). Serious adverse events were observed in 52.6%. The event (n=1) adjudicated as possible macrophage activation syndrome was preceded by sJIA flare. No deaths were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Canakinumab treatment resulted in a sustained treatment response in sJIA patients over 48 weeks and was associated with CS tapering in majority of patients. No new safety findings were reported.

The safety of canakinumab in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and autoinflammatory diseases in pediatric patients: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of canakinumab using real-world data in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and autoinflammatory diseases (AID).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional observational, multicenter study. Patients diagnosed with AID and sJIA treated with canakinumab were included in the study. The participating 13 centers retrospectively collected their patients' data.

RESULTS

A total of 335 patients were involved in the study. Among these patients, 280 were in the AID group and 55 were in the sJIA group. Canakinumab was administered at a median dose of 3 (2.5-4) mg/kg. The median total exposure time to canakinumab was 1.9 (0.8-3.2) years, corresponding to 759.5 patient-years. Seven hundred and seventy-nine total adverse events (AE) were identified. The total incidence of AE, and serious adverse events (SAE) throughout the study period was 1.02 per patient-years. The upper respiratory tract infection rate was 0.7 per patient-years, while the other infection rate was 0.13 per patient-years. While no death was observed in any patient, SAE were observed in 8 patients. Interstitial lung disease, anaphylaxis, or anaphylactoid reactions were not observed in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-life data from a large cohort of patients suggests that canakinumab is as safe as claimed in clinical trials.

Treatment for macrophage activation syndrome associated with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Japan

OBJECTIVES

To clarify how pediatric rheumatologists treat systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (s-JIA) associated macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) in the real world and to assess the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone palmitate (DEX-P) in the treatment of s-JIA-associated MAS.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted at 13 pediatric rheumatology institutes in Japan. This study included 28 patients with s-JIA-associated MAS. Clinical findings, such as treatment details and adverse events, were evaluated.

RESULTS

Methylprednisolone (mPSL) pulse therapy was selected as the first-line treatment in more than half of the patients with MAS. Cyclosporine A (CsA) was used as first-line therapy in combination with corticosteroids in half of the patients with MAS. DEX-P and/or CsA were selected as the second-line therapy in 63% of patients with corticosteroid-resistant MAS. Plasma exchange was selected as the third-line therapy for DEX-P and CsA-resistant MAS. All patients improved and there were no characteristically severe adverse events associated with DEX-P.

CONCLUSIONS

The first-line treatment for MAS in Japan is mPSL pulse therapy and/or CyA. DEX-P could be an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with corticosteroid-resistant MAS.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of canakinumab in patients with tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome or hyperimmunoglobulinaemia D syndrome: Interim results from post-marketing surveillance in Japan

OBJECTIVES

To assess the real-world safety and effectiveness of canakinumab in patients in Japan with tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) or mevalonate kinase deficiency/hyperimmunoglobulinaemia D with periodic fever syndrome (MKD/HIDS).

METHODS

All patients with TRAPS or MKD/HIDS who received canakinumab following drug approval in Japan were registered in a post-marketing all-patient surveillance with a 2-year observation period. Herein, the interim results are reported.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with TRAPS and seven with MKD/HIDS were included in the safety and effectiveness analysis set. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 26.67% (n = 4) and 42.86% (n = 3) of TRAPS and MKD/HIDS patients, respectively. Most common adverse drug reactions were upper respiratory tract inflammation (13.33%, n = 2) and pyrexia (42.86%, n = 3) in TRAPS and MKD/HIDS patients, respectively. No serious adverse drug reactions were observed in either TRAPS or MKD/HIDS patients. The proportion of responders was 46.67% and 14.29% in the TRAPS and MKD/HIDS groups, respectively; 72.73% and 66.67% achieved clinical remission, while 90.91% and 66.67% achieved serological remission by Week 4 in the TRAPS and MKD/HIDS groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These interim results provide the first evidence of the real-world effectiveness of canakinumab in patients with TRAPS or MKD/HIDS in Japan. No new safety concerns were identified.

Efficacy and safety of canakinumab as a second line biologic after tocilizumab treatment failure in children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A single-centre cohort study using routinely collected health data

Background

A significant number of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) patients discontinue biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) due to lack of efficacy or safety concerns. Studies of biologic therapy switch regimens in sJIA are required.

Methods

Patients with sJIA who switched from tocilizumab (due to lack of efficacy or safety) to canakinumab (4 mg/kg every 4 weeks) and were hospitalized at the rheumatology department from August 2012 to July 2020 were included. Primary efficacy outcomes were 30% or greater improvement based on the paediatric criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR30), achievement of inactive disease (JADAS-71 = 0) and clinical remission (ACR sJIA clinical inactive disease criteria). Follow-up from time first canakinumab dose administered was 12 months or the closest time point (not less than 6 and not more than 18 months). Data were extracted from electronic outpatient medical records.

Results

During the study period, 46 patients with sJIA switched from tocilizumab to canakinumab. Median age at baseline was 8.2 [interquartile range (IQR) 4.0-12.9] years, with the median sJIA duration being 1.8 (IQR 0.8-5.8) years; 37 (80%) patients received at least one conventional DMARD (cDMARD; oral corticosteroids, methotrexate and/or cyclosporine A). Study outcomes were followed up in 45 patients (one patient did not attend the follow-up for an unknown reason); median follow-up was 359 (IQR 282-404) days. During the follow-up, 1 patient discontinued canakinumab due to tuberculosis detection and the dose was reduced or the injection interval increased in 4 (9%) patients. In total, 27 (60%) patients continued to receive at least one cDMARD. Improvement according to the ACR30 criteria was achieved in 43 patients [96%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 85-99], inactive disease in 42 (93%; 95%CI 82-98), and remission in 37 (82%; 95% CI 69-91); after adjustment for actual time-at-risk, the rates were 83, 85 and 73 events per 100 person-years, respectively. During follow-up, 23 AEs (most frequently infections) were reported in 19/45 (42%) patients; 5/45 (11%) patients developed macrophage activation syndrome, with a favorable outcome in all cases.

Conclusions

One-year canakinumab therapy was found to be potentially effective as second-line biologic therapy after discontinuation of tocilizumab in patients with sJIA.

Canakinumab as first-line biological therapy in Still's disease and differences between the systemic and the chronic-articular courses: Real-life experience from the international AIDA registry

Objective

Interleukin (IL)-1 inhibitors are largely employed in patients with Still's disease; in cases with refractory arthritis, IL-6 inhibitors have shown to be effective on articular inflammatory involvement. The aim of the present study is to assess any difference in the effectiveness of the IL-1β antagonist canakinumab prescribed as first-line biologic agent between the systemic and the chronic-articular Still's disease.

Methods

Data were drawn from the retrospective phase of the AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance (AIDA) international registry dedicated to Still's disease. Patients with Still's disease classified according to internationally accepted criteria (Yamaguchi criteria and/or Fautrel criteria) and treated with canakinumab as first-line biologic agent were enrolled.

Results

A total of 26 patients (17 females, 9 males; 18 patients developing Still's disease after the age of 16 years) were enrolled; 16 (61.5%) patients suffered from the systemic pattern of the disease; 10 (38.5%) patients suffered from the chronic-articular type. No differences were observed between the systemic and the chronic-articular Still's disease in the frequency of complete response, of flares after the start of canakinumab (p = 0.701) and in the persistence in therapy (p = 0.62). No statistical differences were observed between the two groups after 3 months, 12 months and at the last assessment in the decrease of: the systemic activity score (p = 0.06, p = 0.17, p = 0.17, respectively); the disease activity score on 28 joints (p = 0.54, p = 0.77, p = 0.98, respectively); the glucocorticoid dosage (p = 0.15, p = 0.50, and p = 0.50, respectively); the use of concomitant disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (p = 0.10, p = 1.00, and p = 1.00, respectively). No statistically significant differences were observed in the decrease of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p = 0.34), C reactive protein (p = 0.48), and serum ferritin levels (p = 0.34) after the start of canakinumab.

Conclusion

Canakinumab used for Still's disease has been effective in controlling both clinical and laboratory manifestations disregarding the type of disease course when used as first-line biotechnological agent. These excellent results might have been further enhanced by the early start of IL-1 inhibition.

Similar Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Adult-Onset Still's Disease Treated with Canakinumab: Bayesian and Population Model-Based Analyses

Introduction

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) represent pediatric and adult variants of the Still’s disease continuum. To determine whether clinical outcomes between patients with sJIA and AOSD were similar, Bayesian and population model-based analyses were conducted on endpoints from studies of canakinumab in both patient populations. The objective was to further support the efficacy of canakinumab in patients with AOSD.

Methods

A Bayesian analysis of endpoints from a study of canakinumab in AOSD was conducted borrowing information from five pooled sJIA studies using a robust meta-analytic predictive (MAP) approach. Similarity of clinical outcomes across populations was fulfilled if the AOSD study posterior median fell within the 95% predicted credible interval for the outcome of interest, based on the pooled sJIA data. Population model-based analyses (pharmacokinetic [PK] and PK/pharmacodynamic [PKPD]) were conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics and exposure–response relationships between populations.

Results

The AOSD study posterior medians for adapted American College of Rheumatology (ACR)30 response, continuous adapted ACR response, number of active joints, C-reactive protein, and absence of fever were within the 95% credible interval for the prediction of the MAP analysis from the pooled sJIA data, supporting the similarity in outcomes between patient populations. PK analysis demonstrated comparable exposure across sJIA age groups and patients with AOSD. PKPD relationships were consistent across patient populations. Analyses indicated that no therapeutic benefit can be expected from a dose increase in patients with AOSD.

Conclusion

The analyses presented support the similarity of clinical outcomes following treatment with canakinumab in patients with sJIA and AOSD.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00422-9.

Consensus clinical approach for a newly diagnosed systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis among members of the pediatric rheumatology Arab group

BACKGROUND

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a diagnosis of exclusion. The complex nature and clinical variety of the disease, as well as the vast clinical variation of disease presentation, may lead to difficulties in disease detection and subsequent delays in treatment.

AIM

To provide a consensus guidance on the management of newly diagnosed sJIA patients among pediatric rheumatologists in Arab countries.

METHODS

This work was conducted in two phases. The first phase utilized an electronic survey sent through an email invitation to all pediatric rheumatologists in Arab countries. In the second phase, a Task Force of ten expert pediatric rheumatologists from Arab countries met through a series of virtual meetings. Results obtained in phase one were prioritized using a nominal group and Delphi-like techniques in phase two.

RESULTS

Seven overarching principles and a set of recommendations were approved by the Task Force to form the final consensus.

CONCLUSION

This is the first consensus on a clinical approach for pediatric rheumatic diseases among Arab pediatric rheumatologists. It is presented as a guidance on the clinical approach to sJIA that requires further evidence, and future updates are anticipated.

Efficacy and safety of canakinumab in the treatment of adult-onset Still's disease: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a rare inflammatory disease, typically characterized by spiking fever, skin rash, and arthralgia or arthritis. Its conventional treatment includes NSAIDs and corticosteroids, and DMARDs as second-line therapy. Frequently, IL-1 inhibitors are also required, mainly in patients refractory to traditional therapy. Canakinumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds IL-1β with high affinity and specificity, making it appropriate for therapeutic purposes in AOSD.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to identify and compile the current data on the efficacy and safety of canakinumab in the treatment of AOSD.

METHODS

Following the guidelines established by the PRISMA statement, we searched Scopus, Web of Science, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library for relevant literature up to March 2021. The inclusion criteria comprised: randomized controlled trials, pooled analyses, observational studies, case series, and case reports.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies published from 2012 to 2021 were evaluated; 11 of these correspond to case series or case reports, four observational studies, one placebo-controlled phase II trial, and one analysis of pooled systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis data. In general, out of a total of 99 patients, 68.7% of these presented a complete remission of the systemic and arthritic manifestations at the end of the observation period, while 16.2% of the patients showed a partial improvement of the symptoms and the remaining (15.1%) did not show clinical improvement or were excluded. Moreover, 210 adverse events were reported in 69 patients during canakinumab treatment, of which the majority correspond to respiratory tract infections, arthralgia, disease flares, abdominal pain, nausea, and diarrhea, whereas the most common severe adverse events included macrophage activation syndrome and serious infections. Also, a corticosteroid-sparing effect was observed in a large percentage of patients.

CONCLUSION

More studies with solid evidence are needed to support the efficacy of canakinumab in AOSD, although its use is encouraged by the increasing favorable results reported and the efficacy of other IL-1 inhibitors. It was also associated with an acceptable safety profile, similar to expected in IL-1 inhibitor therapy. However, future studies with well-defined endpoints are warranted to examine further the usefulness of canakinumab in AOSD.

CANAKINUMAB IN SYSTEMIC JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS: REAL-LIFE DATA FROM A RETROSPECTIVE ITALIAN COHORT

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate in real-life the effectiveness and safety of canakinumab in Italian patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA).

METHODS

A retrospective multicentre study of children with sJIA was performed. Clinical features, laboratory parameters and adverse events were collected at baseline, after 6 and 12 months from starting canakinumab. The effectiveness primary outcome was clinical inactive disease (CID) off glucocorticoids (GCs) treatment at 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 80 children were analyzed from 15 Italian centers. Of the 12 patients who started canakinumab in CID while receiving anakinra, all maintained CID. Of the 68 with active disease at baseline, 57.4% achieved CID off GCs at 6 months and 63.8% at 12 months. In univariate analysis, the variables significantly related with non-response were number of active joints (NAJ) ≥5, history of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) and disease duration. Multivariate analysis confirmed the association with non-response of NAJ ≥5 (OR 6.37 (95%CI 1.69-24.02), p= 0.006) and history of MAS (OR 3.53 (95%CI 1.06-11.70), p= 0.039). No serious adverse events were recorded in this series. There were two cases of MAS during canakinumab, leading to a rate of 2.9 episodes per 100 patient year.

CONCLUSION

We confirm, in real-life, the efficacy of canakinumab in sJIA in a multicentric cohort. History of MAS and higher NAJ were associated with lower probability of achieving clinical inactive disease.

Signals and Mechanisms Regulating Monocyte and Macrophage Activation in the Pathogenesis of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Monocytes (Mos) and macrophages (Mφs) are key players in the innate immune system and are critical in coordinating the initiation, expansion, and regression of many autoimmune diseases. In addition, they display immunoregulatory effects that impact inflammation and are essential in tissue repair and regeneration. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is an umbrella term describing inflammatory joint diseases in children. Accumulated evidence suggests a link between Mo and Mφ activation and JIA pathogenesis. Accordingly, topics regarding the signals and mechanisms regulating Mo and Mφ activation leading to pathologies in patients with JIA are of great interest. In this review, we critically summarize recent advances in the understanding of how Mo and Mφ activation is involved in JIA pathogenesis and focus on the signaling pathways and mechanisms participating in the related cell activation processes.

Macrophage activation syndrome in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a severe, potentially life-threatening complication of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (s-JIA). An immunological feature is the excessive activation and proliferation of T lymphocytes and macrophages. Massive hypercytokinemia is strongly associated with its pathogenesis, particularly the overproduction of interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6 and IL-18; interferon (IFN)-γ; and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. Furthermore, heterozygous mutations in causative genes for primary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and in vivo exposure to highly elevated levels of IL-6 and IL-18 might induce natural killer cell dysfunction and decrease their numbers, respectively. A proper diagnosis is important to begin appropriate therapeutic interventions and change an unfavorable prognosis. The 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for MAS have a high diagnostic performance; however, the diagnostic sensitivity for onset is relatively low. Therefore, careful monitoring of laboratory values during the course of MAS is necessary to diagnose it early in s-JIA. Further studies on the diagnosis and monitoring of disease activity using serum cytokine profile and a targeted cytokine strategy are required.

Current Models for Development of Disease-Modifying Osteoarthritis Drugs

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a painful and disabling disease that affects millions of people worldwide. Symptom-alleviating treatments exist, although none with long-term efficacy. Furthermore, there are currently no disease-modifying OA drugs (DMOADs) with demonstrated efficacy in OA patients, which is, in part, attributed to a lack of full understanding of the pathogenesis of OA. The inability to translate findings from basic research to clinical applications also highlights the deficiencies in the available OA models at simulating the clinically relevant pathologies and responses to treatments in humans. In this review, the current status in the development of DMOADs will be first presented, with special attention to those in Phase II-IV clinical trials. Next, current in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo OA models are summarized and the respective advantages and disadvantages of each are highlighted. Of note, the development and application of microphysiological or tissue-on-a-chip systems for modeling OA in humans are presented and the issues that need to be addressed in the future are discussed. Microphysiological systems should be given serious consideration for their inclusion in the DMOAD development pipeline, both for their ability to predict drug safety and efficacy in human clinical trials at present, as well as for their potential to serve as a test platform for personalized medicine. Impact statement At present, no disease-modifying osteoarthritis (OA) drugs (DMOADs) have been approved for widespread clinical use by regulatory bodies. The failure of developing effective DMOADs is likely owing to multiple factors, not the least of which are the intrinsic differences between the intact human knee joint and the preclinical models. This work summarizes the current OA models for the development of DMOADs, discusses the advantages/disadvantages of each, and then proposes future model development to aid in the discovery of effective and personalized DMOADs. The review also highlights the microphysiological systems, which are emerging as a new platform for drug development.