Are males and females similarly consistent in their respective lifting patterns?

The Influence of Contextual and Theoretical Expertise on Generic and Occupation-Specific Lifting Strategy

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether (i) low back loads and/or (ii) kinematic coordination patterns differed across theoretical expert, contextual expert and novice groups when completing both generic and occupation-specific lifts.

BACKGROUND

Experience has been proposed as a factor that could reduce biomechanical exposures in lifting, but the literature reports mixed effects. The inconsistent relationship between experience and exposures may be partially attributable to the broad classification of experience and experimental lifting protocols not replicating the environment where experience was gained.

METHODS

Purposive sampling was used to recruit 72 participants including theoretical experts (formal training on lifting mechanics), contextual experts (paramedics), and novices. Participants performed 10 barbell and crate (generic) lifts, as well as backboard and stretcher (occupation-specific) lifts while whole-body kinematics and ground reaction forces were collected. Peak low back compression and anteroposterior shear loads normalized to body mass, as well as kinematic coordination patterns, were calculated as dependent variables.

RESULTS

No significant differences in low back loads were observed across expertise groups. However, significant differences were seen in kinematic coordination patterns across expertise groups in occupation-specific lifts, but not in generic lifts.

CONCLUSION

Increasing expertise is unlikely to minimize low back loads in lifting. However, contextual expertise did influence lifting kinematics, but only when performing occupationally specific lifts.

APPLICATION

Contextual expertise may help lifters adopt lifting kinematics that enhance the tolerance of their musculoskeletal system to withstand applied loads, but does not seem to reduce the applied low back loads relative to noncontextual expert groups.

Quantifying how functional and structural personal factors influence biomechanical exposures in paramedic lifting tasks

It is unknown how structural (sex, stature, body mass) and functional (strength, flexibility) personal factors influence lifting strategy in paramedic work. We explored whether variance in peak low back forces and kinematic coordination patterns could be explained by structural and functional personal factors in paramedic lifting tasks. Seventy-two participants performed backboard and stretcher lifts. Peak low back forces normalised to body mass, as well as kinematic coordination patterns, were calculated as dependent variables. Being female, stronger, shorter, having higher body mass, and/or having greater lower body range of motion (ROM) were all independently associated with lower normalised low back forces across backboard and stretcher lifting. Females and stronger individuals seemed to define a movement objective to consistently minimise compressive forces, while individuals with greater hip ROM consistently minimised anteroposterior shear forces. The efficacy of improving strength and hip ROM to reduce low back forces in paramedic lifting should be investigated.Practitioner summary: Females, stronger individuals, and individuals with greater hip range of motion consistently exhibited lower normalised low back forces in paramedic lifting. Improving strength and hip range of motion via training is a potential proactive ergonomics approach to reduce peak low back forces in paramedic lifting tasks.

Differential effects of sex on upper body kinematics and kinetics during fatiguing, Asymmetric lifting

This study quantified sex-specific biomechanical adaptations to fatigue in asymmetric lifting. Twenty-one females and fifteen males performed a prolonged asymmetric lifting protocol while upper body, trunk and pelvis kinematics were collected. Features of movement identified with principal component analysis, and peak joint angular velocities and moments were calculated. Sex-specific kinematic adaptations to fatigue included females adopting a 'stoop-like' lifting strategy to a greater extent than males. Additionally, females exhibited higher vertical elbow positions during load rotation, moved their body toward the destination for load deposit, and did not reduce peak right shoulder flexion velocities, in contrast to male participants. Females also had greater low back and shoulder peak normalized joint moments. When fatigued, females adopted an asymmetric lifting strategy that minimized metabolic demand as supported by smaller decreases in maximum voluntary contractions. However, females' fatigue-related adaptations increased biomechanical exposures associated with injury risk.

The influence of sex and strength capacity on normalized low-back exposure during lifting: Insights from a joint power analysis

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the influence of sex, strength capacity, and relative load mass on low-back exposure and lower extremity joint power generation in backboard lifting.

BACKGROUND

Sex and strength have been shown to influence lifting strategy, but without load mass being scaled to strength it is unknown which factor influences low-back exposures, and whether there are interactions with load mass.

METHODS

Motion capture and force plate data from 28 participants were collected during backboard lifting at load masses scaled to strength capacity. Differences in normalized peak low-back moment, peak knee-to-hip power magnitude ratio and timing were tested as a function of sex, strength, and load mass.

RESULTS

Stronger participants had lower normalized peak low-back moments (average 32% change from low-capacity across all load masses), with no significant sex effect (p = 0.582). As load mass increased, normalized peak low-back moment, peak knee-to-hip power magnitude and synchronicity decreased.

CONCLUSION

Training to both increase strength capacity and hip-joint power generation may be a strategy to reduce low-back exposure in backboard lifting.

Towards the Use of 2D Video-Based Markerless Motion Capture to Measure and Parameterize Movement During Functional Capacity Evaluation

Purpose The objective of this study was to determine the agreement of kinematic parameters calculated from motion data collected via a 2D video-based pose-estimation (markerless motion capture) approach and a laboratory-based 3D motion capture approach during a floor-to-waist height functional lifting test. Method Twenty healthy participants each performed three floor-to-waist height lifts. Participants' lifts were captured simultaneously using 2D video (camcorder) in the sagittal plane and 3D motion capture (Vicon, Oxford, UK). The three lifts were representative of a perceived light, medium, and heavy load. Post-collection, video data were processed through a pose-estimation software (i.e., markerless motion capture). Motion data from 3D motion capture and video-based markerless motion capture were each used to calculate objective measures of interest relevant to a functional capacity evaluation (i.e., posture, balance, distance of the load from the body, and coordination). Bland-Altman analyses were used to calculate agreement between the two methods. Results Bland-Altman analysis revealed that mean differences ranged from 1.9° to 22.1° for posture and coordination-based metrics calculated using markerless and 3D motion capture, respectively. Limits of agreement for most posture and coordination measures were approximately + 20°. Conclusions 2D video-based pose estimation offers a strategy to objectively measure movement and subsequently calculated metrics of interest within an FCE context and setting, but at present the agreement between metrics calculated using 2D video-based methods and 3D motion capture is insufficient. Therefore, continued effort is required to improve the accuracy of 2D-video based pose estimation prior to inclusion into functional testing paradigms.

Understanding individual differences in lifting mechanics: Do some people adopt motor control strategies that minimize biomechanical exposure

The movement strategy an individual uses to complete a lift can influence the resultant biomechanical exposure on their low back. We hypothesize that some lifters may choose a motor control strategy to minimize exposure to the low back, where others may not. Lower magnitudes of exposure to the low back coupled with less variability in lift-to-lift exposure and in features of movement strategy related to biomechanical exposure would support that such lifters consider minimizing exposure in their motor control strategy. We tested this hypothesis by investigating if differences in variability of low back exposure measures, as well as features of movement strategy related to resultant low back exposures differed across lifters. Twenty-eight healthy adults participated in the study where ten repetitions of a lifting task with the load scaled to 75% of participant's one-repetition maximum were completed. In all trials, whole-body kinematics and ground reaction forces were collected. Lifters were grouped as low, moderate or high relative exposure based on low back flexion angles and normalized L4/L5 extensor moments when lifting. Principal component analysis was used to identify independent movement strategy features, and statistical testing determined which features differed between high and low exposure lifts. Variability in low back exposures and movement features associated with relative biomechanical exposure were compared across lifter classifications. Significantly less variability was observed in low back exposures among the low exposure lifter group. Additionally, a trend towards lower variability in movement features associated with relative biomechanical exposure was also observed in low exposure lifters. These findings provide initial support for the hypothesis that some lifters likely define a motor control strategy that considers minimizing biomechanical exposure in addition to completing the lift demands. Future work should explore how state and trait-based factors influence an individual to consider biomechanical exposure within their motor control strategy in lifting.

Is deep squat movement strategy related to floor-to-waist height lifting strategy: implications for physical employment testing

Generalised predictive tests may be viable screening tools to evaluate job candidate workability if movement strategy used in assessment is consistent with movement strategy used in work. This study investigated if deep squat (DS) kinematics could predict floor-to-waist height lifting kinematics. Participants performed three DS repetitions, and 10 lifts of both a 10 kg and 20 kg box. Whole body kinematics were collected to calculate knee, hip and low back angles, and coordination as measured by relative phase angles. Movement features of lower extremity control, including knee and hip angles and coordination, were significantly correlated (r = 0.43-0.85) between the DS and lifting. However, low back movement features, measures linked to injury risk, were not significantly correlated between the DS and lifting. These findings do not support the DS as a suitable movement screen to predict lifting strategy, specifically when considering low back control. Practitioner summary: This study investigated whether lifting strategy could be inferred from deep squat performance. Knee and hip movement strategies were associated between the deep squat and lifting. However, inconsistencies in low back control between the deep squat and lifting limit the deep squat's injury risk assessment potential.

Difference between male and female workers lifting the same relative load when palletizing boxes

A few biomechanical studies have contrasted the work techniques of female and male workers during manual material handling (MMH). A recent study showed that female workers differed from males mostly in the strategy they used to lift 15-kg boxes from the ground, especially regarding task duration, knee and back postures and interjoint coordination. However, the lifting technique difference observed in females compared to males was perhaps due to a strength differences. The objective of this study was to test whether female workers would repeat the same lifting technique with a load adjusted to their overall strength (females: 10 kg; males: 15 kg), which can be considered a "relative load" since the overall back strength of females is 2/3 that of males. The task for the participants consisted in transferring boxes from one pallet to another. A dynamic 3D linked segment model was used to estimate the net moments at L5/S1, and different kinematic variables were considered. The results showed that the biomechanics of the lifting techniques used by males and females were similar in terms of task duration and cumulative loading, but different in terms of interjoint coordination pattern. The sequential interjoint coordination pattern previously seen in females with an absolute load (15 kg) was still present with the relative load, suggesting the influence of factors more intrinsically linked to sex. Considering that the female coordination pattern likely stretched posterior passive tissues when lifting boxes from the ground, potentially leading to higher risk of injury, the reason for this sex effect must be identified so that preventive interventions can be proposed.

Sex differences in lifting strategies during a repetitive palletizing task

Forty-five manual material handlers (15 females, 15 expert males and 15 novice males) performed series of box transfers under conditions similar to those of large distribution centers. The objective of the study was to verify whether sex differences in joint motions and in back loading variables (L5/S1 moments) exist during multiple box transfers. The task consisted in transferring 24 15-kg boxes from one pallet to another (4 layers of boxes; 6 boxes/layer: 3 in the front row, 3 in the back) at a self-determined pace and then at an imposed pace of 9 lifts/min. Full-body 3D kinematic data were collected as well as external foot forces. A dynamic 3D linked segment model was used to estimate the net moments at L5/S1. The results show that the peak L5/S1 moment during lifting for females was significantly lower than for males, but once normalized to body size the difference disappeared. In general, the female workers were very close to the posture adopted by the novice males at the instant of the peak resultant moment. However, females were closer to the box than the male workers. One major sex difference was seen when lifting from the ground, with the use of interjoint coordination analyses. Female workers showed a sequential motion initiated by the knees, followed by the hip and the back, while expert males showed a more synchronized motion. The lifting strategy of females likely stretches lumbar spine passive tissues, which in turn put them at greater risk of back injuries. As observed in our previous studies, these differences between expert males, novice males and females are especially notable when the box is lifted from the ground.

Effects of age and its interaction with task parameters on lifting biomechanics

This study investigated the age-related differences in lifting biomechanics. Eleven younger and 12 older participants were instructed to perform symmetric lifting tasks defined by different combinations of destination heights and load magnitudes. Lifting biomechanics was assessed. It was found that the trunk flexion in the starting posture was 32% lower and the peak trunk extension velocity was 46% lower in older participants compared with those in younger ones, indicating that older adults tended to use safer lifting strategies than did younger adults. Based on these findings, we recommend that physical exercise programmes may be a more effective ergonomic intervention for reducing the risks of low back pain (LBP) in lifting among older workers, compared with instructions of safe lifting strategies. As for younger workers, instructions of safe lifting strategies would be effective in LBP risk reduction.

Quantifying the movement and the influence of load in the back squat exercise

The squat is used extensively in strength and conditioning, physical therapy, rehabilitation, and fitness programs. However, the movement pattern of the hip and knee is still relatively unknown, in particular, the timing of when maximum angles is reached. The purpose of this study was to quantify the hip and knee movements of the squat and establish if load alters these movements. Twenty-eight subjects (16 men and 12 women) performed 2 sets of 8 squats. Load was applied in random order as no additional weight (body weight [BW]) or an additional load of 50% of the subject's weight (BW+50%). Joint angles and time for hip and knee, as well as forward knee, displacement in the descent and ascent phases were measured with significance at p<0.05. Regardless of gender, phase, and load, all subjects achieved their maximum hip and knee angles within 2% of the deepest position. Load significantly increased the flexion angle at the hip and knee joints in men. The knees movement forward of the toes ranged from 63.8 to 64.7 mm in men and 93.2 to 96.6 mm in women. A significant difference in the timing of when the maximum forward knee movement occurred was observed because of gender. The overriding factor for the practical prescription of squat technique was regardless of load, gender, or phase; the maximum angles of the hip and knee are reached almost simultaneously at the bottom of the squat. Furthermore, for all subjects, the knee moved forward of the toes when squatting with men reaching their maximum forward knee position around 84% of the descent phase, whereas this occurred for women around 93%.