Niraparib for the treatment of ovarian cancer

Rare Occurrence of Aristolochic Acid Mutational Signatures in Oro-Gastrointestinal Tract Cancers

BACKGROUND

Aristolochic acids (AAs) are potent mutagens commonly found in herbal plant-based remedies widely used throughout Asian countries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To understand whether AA is involved in the tumorigenesis of the oro-gastrointestinal tract, we used whole-exome sequencing to profile 54 cases of four distinct types of oro-gastrointestinal tract cancer (OGITC) from Taiwan.

RESULTS

A diverse landscape of mutational signatures including those from DNA mismatch repair and reactive oxygen species was observed. APOBEC mutational signatures were observed in 60% of oral squamous cell carcinomas. Only one sample harbored AA mutational signatures, contradictory to prior reports of cancers from Taiwan. The metabolism of AA in the liver and urinary tract, transient exposure time, and high cell turnover rates at OGITC sites may explain our findings.

CONCLUSION

AA signatures in OGITCs are rare and unlikely to be a major contributing factor in oro-gastrointestinal tract tumorigenesis.

Recent advancements of antiangiogenic combination therapies in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is a deadly malignancy with a growing therapeutic armamentarium, though achieving sustained benefit in the clinic remains largely elusive. Through biomarker and genetic analysis, several pathways of resistance and sensitivity to commonly used therapeutics have been identified, expanding the potential of identifying unique drug combinations and indicating new directions for improving clinical outcomes. Here, we review the mechanisms of angiogenic response and antiangiogenic therapy in ovarian cancer, as well as the interactions it exhibits with the immune and DNA damage response pathways. We discuss results from clinical trials examining the combinations of antiangiogenics, PARP inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors are also discussed, as well as several ongoing trials.

Indazole as a Privileged Scaffold: The Derivatives and their Therapeutic Applications

BACKGROUND

Heterocyclic compounds, also called heterocycles, are a major class of organic chemical compound that plays a vital role in the metabolism of all living cells. The heterocyclic compound, indazole, has attracted more attention in recent years and is widely present in numerous commercially available drugs. Indazole-containing derivatives, representing one of the most important heterocycles in drug molecules, are endowed with a broad range of biological properties.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar and Web of Science regarding articles related to indazole and its therapeutic application.

RESULTS

The mechanism and structure-activity relationship of indazole and its derivatives were described. Based on their versatile biological activities, the compounds were divided into six groups: anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, anti-HIV, antiarrhythmic, antifungal and antitumour. At least 43 indazole-based therapeutic agents were found to be used in clinical application or clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

This review is a guide for pharmacologists who are in search of valid preclinical/clinical drug compounds where the progress of approved marketed drugs containing indazole scaffold is examined from 1966 to the present day. Future direction involves more diverse bioactive moieties with indazole scaffold and greater insights into its mechanism.

Efficacy and pharmacodynamics of niraparib in BRCA-mutant and wild-type intracranial triple-negative breast cancer murine models

Background

Despite the poor prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) brain metastases, there are no approved systemic therapies. We explored the DNA-damaging poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) niraparib in intracranial mouse models of breast cancer susceptibility protein (BRCA)-mutant TNBC.

Methods

Mice bearing intracranial human-derived TNBC cell lines (SUM149, MDA-MB-231Br, or MDA-MB-436) were treated with niraparib and monitored for survival; intracranial tissues were analyzed for PAR levels and niraparib concentration by mass spectrometry. RNASeq data of primary breast cancers using The Cancer Genome Atlas were analyzed for DNA damage signatures. Combined RAD51 and PARP inhibition in TNBC cell lines was assessed in vitro by colony-forming assays.

Results

Daily niraparib increased median survival and decreased tumor burden in the BRCA-mutant MDA-MB-436 model, but not in the BRCA-mutant SUM149 or BRCA-wild-type MDA-MB-231Br models despite high concentrations in intracranial tumors. RAD51 inhibitor B02 was shown to sensitize all cell lines to PARP inhibition (PARPi). In the analysis of BRCA-mutant primary human TNBCs, gene expression predictors of PARPi sensitivity and DNA repair signatures demonstrate widespread heterogeneity, which may explain the differential response to PARPi. Interestingly, these signatures are significantly correlated to RAD51 expression including PARPi sensitivity (R² = 0.602, R²= 0.758).

Conclusions

Niraparib penetrates intracranial tumor tissues in mouse models of TNBC with impressive single-agent efficacy in BRCA-mutant MDA-MB-436. Clinical evaluation of niraparib to treat TNBC brain metastases, an unmet clinical need desperate for improved therapies, is warranted. Further compromising DNA repair through RAD51 inhibition may further augment TNBC’s response to PARPi.

Niraparib for the Treatment of Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To review the efficacy and safety of niraparib for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer (OC, FTC, and PPC).

DATA SOURCES

A literature search via MEDLINE through PubMed from August 2013 to January 2020 was performed using the key terms niraparib, PARP inhibitors, ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Completed and ongoing trials were identified through a review of the website trial registry https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In a phase III, double-blind clinical trial, progression-free survival improved in patients treated with niraparib compared with placebo as maintenance treatment for patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent OC: 21 versus 5.5 months in the germline breast cancer susceptibility gene (gBRCA) cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.27; 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.41; P < 0.001) and 9.3 versus 3.9 months in the overall nongermline breast cancer susceptibility gene (non-gBRCA) cohort (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.61; P < 0.001). Adverse events included thrombocytopenia and anemia.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have gained a place in the therapeutic management of OC, FTC, and PPC because of their ability to suppress growth of homologous recombination deficiency-positive tumors, including those with BRCA1/2 mutations. Niraparib inhibits the DNA repair mechanism vital to the survival of cancer cells, poly-ADP ribose polymerase.

CONCLUSIONS

PARP inhibitors can be used as a single agent for maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive recurrent disease in patients with partial or complete response following 2 or more rounds of platinum-based therapy.

Expectations and preferences of patients with primary and relapsed ovarian cancer to maintenance therapy: A NOGGO/ENGOT-ov22 and GCIG survey (Expression IV)

BACKGROUND

Maintenance therapy induces remission and prolongs disease free interval in primary and recurrent ovarian disease. For the treatment decision making process, aspects of quality of life and patients' preferences are crucial, despite the fact that scientific data are lacking. Therefore, we conducted this European-wide study in patients with ovarian cancer.

METHODS

A 25 item questionnaire was provided to ovarian cancer patients via the internet or as a paper version in 10 European countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Romania, Slovenia, Finland, Turkey, and Spain). Data recorded were demographics, tumor stage, therapy after firstline and recurrent disease, preferences for administration, and expectations concerning maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

Overall, 1954 patients participated from September 2013 to March 2016; 42% had recurrent disease. Most patients (98%) with primary epithelial ovarian cancer underwent surgery followed by chemotherapy (91%). Almost one-third of participants (29%) were receiving maintenance therapy whereas 45% had only heard of it. For 70% of patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer, they heard about maintenance therapy from their doctor, 10% heard about maintenance therapy from other patients, and 8% from the internet. The main source of information about maintenance therapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer relapse was from the treating physician (72%), from other patients (8%), and from the internet (7%). For patients undergoing maintenance therapy, the four most disturbing adverse effects were polyneuropathy (37%), nausea (36%), hair loss (34%), and vomiting (34%). The main objective of maintenance treatment, as perceived by patients, was to increase the chances of cure (73%), improvement in quality of life (47%), and delay in tumor growth (37%). Many patients were willing to undergo maintenance therapy until tumor progression (38%) and 39% would prefer oral administration. No significant differences were detected in the cross country subanalysis regarding expectations of maintenance therapy and patients with primary or relapsed ovarian cancer.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ovarian cancer were willing to accept maintenance therapy of prolonged duration and preferred oral administration. There is still a gap between the efficacy of maintenance therapy and patient expectations. Patients need more information on the adverse effects and treatment goals of maintenance therapy to avoid misunderstandings.

Synergistic Highly Potent Targeted Drug Combinations in Different Pheochromocytoma Models Including Human Tumor Cultures

There are no officially approved therapies for metastatic pheochromocytomas apart from ultratrace 131I-metaiodbenzylguanidine therapy, which is approved only in the United States. We have, therefore, investigated the antitumor potential of molecular-targeted approaches in murine pheochromocytoma cell lines [monocyte chemoattractant protein (MPC)/monocyte chemoattractant protein/3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT)], immortalized mouse chromaffin Sdhb-/- cells, three-dimensional pheochromocytoma tumor models (MPC/MTT spheroids), and human pheochromocytoma primary cultures. We identified the specific phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase α inhibitor BYL719 and the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus as the most effective combination in all models. Single treatment with clinically relevant doses of BYL719 and everolimus significantly decreased MPC/MTT and Sdhb-/- cell viability. A targeted combination of both inhibitors synergistically reduced MPC and Sdhb-/- cell viability and showed an additive effect on MTT cells. In MPC/MTT spheroids, treatment with clinically relevant doses of BYL719 alone or in combination with everolimus was highly effective, leading to a significant shrinkage or even a complete collapse of the spheroids. We confirmed the synergism of clinically relevant doses of BYL719 plus everolimus in human pheochromocytoma primary cultures of individual patient tumors with BYL719 attenuating everolimus-induced AKT activation. We have thus established a method to assess molecular-targeted therapies in human pheochromocytoma cultures and identified a highly effective combination therapy. Our data pave the way to customized combination therapy to target individual patient tumors.

DNA Double Strand Break Repair - Related Synthetic Lethality

Cancer is a heterogeneous disease with a high degree of diversity between and within tumors. Our limited knowledge of their biology results in ineffective treatment. However, personalized approach may represent a milestone in the field of anticancer therapy. It can increase specificity of treatment against tumor initiating cancer stem cells (CSCs) and cancer progenitor cells (CPCs) with minimal effect on normal cells and tissues. Cancerous cells carry multiple genetic and epigenetic aberrations which may disrupt pathways essential for cell survival. Discovery of synthetic lethality has led a new hope of creating effective and personalized antitumor treatment. Synthetic lethality occurs when simultaneous inactivation of two genes or their products causes cell death whereas individual inactivation of either gene is not lethal. The effectiveness of numerous anti-tumor therapies depends on induction of DNA damage therefore tumor cells expressing abnormalities in genes whose products are crucial for DNA repair pathways are promising targets for synthetic lethality. Here, we discuss mechanistic aspects of synthetic lethality in the context of deficiencies in DNA double strand break repair pathways. In addition, we review clinical trials utilizing synthetic lethality interactions and discuss the mechanisms of resistance.

Discovery of 2-(1-(3-(4-Chloroxyphenyl)-3-oxo- propyl)pyrrolidine-3-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-4-carboxamide: A Potent Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitor for Treatment of Cancer

A series of benzimidazole carboxamide derivatives have been synthesized and characterized by ¹H-NMR, ¹³C-NMR and HRMS. PARP inhibition assays and cellular proliferation assays have also been carried out. Compounds 5cj and 5cp exhibited potential anticancer activities with IC₅₀ values of about 4 nM against both PARP-1 and PARP-2, similar to the reference drug veliparib. The two compounds also displayed slightly better in vitro cytotoxicities against MDA-MB-436 and CAPAN-1 cell lines than veliparib and olaparib, with values of 17.4 µM and 11.4 µM, 19.8 µM and 15.5 µM, respectively. The structure-activity relationship based on molecular docking was discussed as well.

Portrait of a cancer: mutational signature analyses for cancer diagnostics

BACKGROUND

In the past decade, systematic and comprehensive analyses of cancer genomes have identified cancer driver genes and revealed unprecedented insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying the initiation and progression of cancer. These studies illustrate that although every cancer has a unique genetic make-up, there are only a limited number of mechanisms that shape the mutational landscapes of cancer genomes, as reflected by characteristic computationally-derived mutational signatures. Importantly, the molecular mechanisms underlying specific signatures can now be dissected and coupled to treatment strategies. Systematic characterization of mutational signatures in a cancer patient's genome may thus be a promising new tool for molecular tumor diagnosis and classification.

RESULTS

In this review, we describe the status of mutational signature analysis in cancer genomes and discuss the opportunities and relevance, as well as future challenges, for further implementation of mutational signatures in clinical tumor diagnostics and therapy guidance.

CONCLUSIONS

Scientific studies have illustrated the potential of mutational signature analysis in cancer research. As such, we believe that the implementation of mutational signature analysis within the diagnostic workflow will improve cancer diagnosis in the future.

An Ensemble Strategy to Predict Prognosis in Ovarian Cancer Based on Gene Modules

Due to the high heterogeneity and complexity of cancer, it is still a challenge to predict the prognosis of cancer patients. In this work, we used a clustering algorithm to divide patients into different subtypes in order to reduce the heterogeneity of the cancer patients in each subtype. Based on the hypothesis that the gene co-expression network may reveal relationships among genes, some communities in the network could influence the prognosis of cancer patients and all the prognosis-related communities could fully reveal the prognosis of cancer patients. To predict the prognosis for cancer patients in each subtype, we adopted an ensemble classifier based on the gene co-expression network of the corresponding subtype. Using the gene expression data of ovarian cancer patients in TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas), three subtypes were identified. Survival analysis showed that patients in different subtypes had different survival risks. Three ensemble classifiers were constructed for each subtype. Leave-one-out and independent validation showed that our method outperformed control and literature methods. Furthermore, the function annotation of the communities in each subtype showed that some communities were cancer-related. Finally, we found that the current drug targets can partially support our method.

PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: Sensitivity prediction and resistance mechanisms

Poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have provided great clinical benefits to ovarian cancer patients. To date, three PARP inhibitors, namely, olaparib, rucaparib and niraparib have been approved for the treatment of ovarian cancer in the United States. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and platinum sensitivity are prospective biomarkers for predicting the response to PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancers. Preclinical data have focused on identifying the gene aberrations that might generate HRD and induce sensitivity to PARP inhibitors in vitro in cancer cell lines or in vivo in patient‐derived xenografts. Clinical trials have focused on genomic scar analysis to identify biomarkers for predicting the response to PARP inhibitors. Additionally, researchers have aimed to investigate mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors and strategies to overcome this resistance. Combining PARP inhibitors with HR pathway inhibitors to extend the utility of PARP inhibitors to BRCA‐proficient tumours is increasingly foreseeable. Identifying the population of patients with the greatest potential benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy and the circumstances under which patients are no longer suited for PARP inhibitor therapy are important. Further studies are required in order to propose better strategies for overcoming resistance to PARP inhibitor therapy in ovarian cancers.

The CHK1 inhibitor SRA737 synergizes with PARP1 inhibitors to kill carcinoma cells

Inhibitors of PARP1 are approved therapeutic agents in ovarian carcinomas. We determined whether the novel clinically relevant CHK1 inhibitor SRA737 interacted with PARP1 inhibitors to kill carcinoma cells. In multiple mammary and ovarian cancer lines SRA737 synergized with the PARP1 inhibitors olaparib and niraparib to cause cell death. The [SRA737 + niraparib] drug combination activated an ATM-AMPK-ULK1-mTOR pathway which resulted in the formation of autophagosomes, temporally followed by autolysosome formation. Phosphorylation of ULK1 S317 was essential for kinase activation against ATG13. The drug combination elevated eIF2α phosphorylation which was causal at increasing Beclin1 and ATG5 expression, reducing MCL-1 and BCL-XL levels, and causing CD95 activation. Knock down of CD95, eIF2α, ATM, AMPKα, ULK1, Beclin1 or ATG5 reduced drug combination lethality. Blockade of either caspase 9 function or that of AIF each partially prevented cell death. Expression of activated mTOR or of c-FLIP-s or of BCL-XL reduced cell killing. In vivo, SRA737 and niraparib interacted in an additive fashion to suppress the growth of mammary tumors. Multiplex analyses revealed that drug combination treated tumors had reduced their plasma levels of sERBB1, sERBB2, sVEGFR1, sVEGFR2, sIL-6R, HGF, PDGFAB/BB and CXCL16 and enhanced the levels of CCL26, IL-8 and MIF. Surviving tumors had activated ERK1/2 and AKT. This finding argues that IL-8/ERK/AKT signaling may be an evolutionary survival response to [SRA737 + niraparib].

Moving From Mutation to Actionability

The diffusion of high-throughput next-generation sequencing technologies has sustained massive parallel sequencing of tumor tissue providing a deep insight into tumor biology and advancement of personalized medicine. A substantial number of targeted agents have been investigated in gynecologic cancer and some have received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval, like PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer, bevacizumab in ovarian and cervical cancers, and pembrolizumab in microsatellite-unstable or mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer. To improve effectiveness of targeted therapy, identification of predictive biomarkers able to guide the selection of the correct drug for the correct patient is crucial. Different limitations must be addressed to favor a more rapid implementation of a genotyping approach in treatment selection, such as the possibility to easily assess tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution along the disease trajectory and the need for innovative trial designs like adaptive or basket trials incorporating molecular features as selection criteria. A deep dive into the genomic features of exceptional responders may also favor better understanding of tumor biology, mechanism of action of a specific target agent, and identification or predictive biomarkers for subsequent tailored studies.

Double-barreled gun: Combination of PARP inhibitor with conventional chemotherapy

DNA repair pathways are evolutionarily conserved molecular mechanisms that maintain the integrity of genomic DNA. In cancer therapies, the integrity and activity of DNA repair pathways predict therapy resistance and disease outcome. Members of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) family initiate and organize the biologic process of DNA repair, which counteracts many types of chemotherapies. Since the first development in approximately 3 decades ago, PARP inhibitors have greatly changed the concept of cancer therapy, leading to encouraging improvements in tumor suppression and disease outcomes. Here we summaries both pre-clinical and clinical findings of PARP inhibitors applications, particularly for combination therapies.

Rucaparib: An emerging parp inhibitor for treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

Recently, Poly-ADP-Ribose Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are one of the most intensively studied group of antiblastic agents for the management of recurrent ovarian cancer. Among this family, Olaparib was the first to be approved by European Medicines Agency as maintenance therapy post-response to platinum-based chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer in women with deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation. Following that, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Olaparib monotherapy as fourth or later line of treatment in advanced ovarian cancer with deleterious germ-line BRCA1/2 mutation. On March 2017, Niraparib, was approved as maintenance treatment of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, who are in complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy, independently of BRCA mutation. Rucaparib inhibits PARP-1, 2 and 3, PARP-4, -12, -15 and -16, as well as tankyrase 1 and 2. On December 2016, it was granted accelerated approval by the FDA, based on data from two multicenter, single arm, phase II trials that evaluated the efficacy of Rucaparib in patients with deleterious, germline and/or somatic BRCA mutation-associated, advanced OC, who have been treated with two or more lines of chemotherapy. The maximum tolerated dose reported was 600 mg twice a day administered orally. Phase III studies are currently ongoing to further validate the efficacy of Rucaparib in the treatment setting and explore its usefulness in a maintenance setting as well. The focus of our review is to report the most recent investigations and clinical progress regarding Rucaparib for treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.

Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor PJ34 Attenuated Hepatic Triglyceride Accumulation in Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Mice

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is an NAD-consuming enzyme and its specific role in the pathogenesis of alcoholic fatty liver disease (AFLD) remains elusive. In this study, we applied PJ34 [N-(5,6-dihydro-6-oxo-2-phenanthridinyl)-2-acetamide hydrochloride] to inhibit hepatic PARP activity to examine the corresponding pathologic alteration in AFLD in mice and the underlying molecular mechanism. We found that PJ34 decreased the intracellular triglyceride (TG) content in hepatocytes. Moreover, PJ34 suppressed the gene expression of diglyceride acyltransferases DGAT1 and DGAT2 and elevated intracellular NAD⁺ levels in hepatocytes. These mechanistic observations were validated in alcohol-fed mice injected with PJ34 intraperitoneally. Our results indicate that the PJ34 injection attenuated hepatic TG accumulation in alcohol-fed mice. Furthermore, PJ34 injection lowered the gene expression of hepatic sterol regulatory element binding protein 1c, DGAT1, and DGAT2, whereas PJ34 injection augmented hepatic NAD⁺ levels in alcohol-fed mice. Finally, nicotinamide riboside supplementation alleviated hepatic TG accumulation in alcohol-fed mice. These data indicate that applying PARP-specific inhibitor PJ34 by intraperitoneal injection attenuated hepatic NAD⁺ depletion and TG accumulation in alcohol-fed mice and may be a potential candidate for use in AFLD therapy.

PARP inhibitors as potential therapeutic agents for various cancers: focus on niraparib and its first global approval for maintenance therapy of gynecologic cancers

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) are an important family of nucleoproteins highly implicated in DNA damage repair. Among the PARP families, the most studied are PARP1, PARP2 and PARP 3. PARP1 is found to be the most abundant nuclear enzyme under the PARP series. These enzymes are primarily involved in base excision repair as one of the major single strand break (SSB) repair mechanisms. Being double stranded, DNA engages itself in reparation of a sub-lethal SSB with the aid of PARP. Moreover, by having a sister chromatid, DNA can also repair double strand breaks with either error-free homologous recombination or error-prone non-homologous end-joining. For effective homologous recombination repair, DNA requires functional heterozygous breast cancer genes (BRCA) which encode BRCA1/2. Currently, the development of PARP inhibitors has been one of the promising breakthroughs for cancer chemotherapy. In March 2017, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved niraparib for maintenance therapy of recurrent gynecologic cancers (epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal and fallopian tube carcinomas) which are sensitive to previous platinum based chemotherapy irrespective of BRCA mutation and homologous recombination deficiency status. It is the third drug in this class to receive FDA approval, following olaparib and rucaparib and is the first global approval for maintenance therapy of the aforementioned cancers. Niraparib preferentially blocks both PARP1 and PARP2 enzymes. The daily tolerated dose of niraparib is 300 mg, above which dose limiting grade 3 and 4 toxicities were observed. In combination with humanized antibody, pembrolizumab, it is also under investigation for those patients who have triple negative breast cancer. By and large, there are several clinical trials that are underway investigating clinical efficacy and safety, as well as other pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of this drug for various malignancies.