Autophagy as a therapeutic mechanism to kill drug-resistant cancer cells

Herein we discuss multiple pre-clinical projects developed by our group that have been translated into patients at Massey Cancer Center. Our work has used multi-kinase inhibitors, for example, sorafenib, regorafenib and neratinib, and combined with additional agents, for example, histone deacetylase inhibitors, the thymidylate synthase inhibitor pemetrexed, and PDE5 inhibitors. In broad-brush terms, our experience has been that these drug combinations enhance signaling by ATM-AMPK-ULK-1 and decrease signaling from growth factor receptors and RAS proteins, thereby lowering the activities of the intracellular signaling kinase ERK1/2, AKT, mTOR and p70 S6K . This collectively results in reduced protein synthesis and the induction of an endoplasmic reticulum stress response alongside autophagosome formation and autophagic flux. The rupture of autolysosomes, releasing proteases such as cathepsin B into the cytosol results in the cleavage and activation of the toxic BH3 domain protein BID which cooperates with BAX, BAK and BIM to cause mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to the release of cytochrome c and AIF, which then execute the tumor cell. For each of our two-drug combinations, we then performed additional laboratory-based studies to define the development of evolutionary resistance mechanisms, with the long-term concept of performing new three-drug clinical trials to prolong therapeutic efficacy and disease control.

Cellular responses after (neratinib plus pemetrexed) exposure in NSCLC cells

We previously demonstrated that neratinib interacted with pemetrexed to kill non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. From developing other drug combinations, we observed that several days following exposure, cells activated survival mechanisms to counteract drug toxicity. The present studies attempted to define mechanisms that evolve to reduce the efficacy of neratinib and pemetrexed. Neratinib and pemetrexed synergized to kill NSCLC cells expressing wild-type RAS proteins, mutant KRAS (G12S; Q61H; G12A and G12C) or mutant NRAS (Q61K) or mutant ERBB1 (L858R; L858R T790M and exon 19 deletion). Neratinib and pemetrexed interacted in a greater than additive fashion to kill after 24 h, and after a further 24 h culture in the absence of drugs. Mutant KRAS G12V was more cytoprotective than either activated MEK1 or activated AKT. Knockdown of mutant KRAS reduced drug combination killing at the 48 h timepoint. Despite culture for 24 h in the absence of the drugs, the expression and activities of ERBB1, ERBB2 and ERBB4 remained significantly lower as did the activities of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) C1 and mTORC2. The drug combination reduced KRAS and NRAS levels for 24 h, however, in the absence of the drugs, RAS levels had normalized by 48 h. Expression of Beclin1 and ATG5 remained elevated and of MCL1 and BCL-XL lower. No evolutionary activations of survival signaling by ERBB3, c-KIT, c-MET or PDGFRβ or in intracellular signaling pathways were observed. These findings argue against the development of 'early' resistance mechanisms after neratinib and pemetrexed exposure. Future studies will be required to understand how NSCLC cells become resistant to neratinib and pemetrexed.

Long-term outcome analysis of Y90 radioembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization is a catheter-based therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Multiple trials have evaluated the efficacy of Y90 in HCC; however, few have assessed long-term hepatic function. This study aimed to evaluate a clinical real-world experience of Y90 effectiveness and long-term impact on hepatic function.

Methods

A single-center retrospective chart review was performed for patients with Child-Pugh (CP) class A or B who received Y90 for primary HCC between 2008 and 2016. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and CP scores were calculated on the day of treatment and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-procedure.

Results

Of the 134 patients included, the mean age was 60 years old and median overall survival (OS) from date of diagnosis was 28 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 22.21-38.05]. Patients with CP class A (85%) had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3 months (95% CI: 2.99-5.55) and median OS of 17 months (95% CI: 9.59-23.10) from date of Y90 treatment compared to a median PFS of 4 months (95% CI: 2.07-8.28) and OS of 8 months (95% CI: 4.60-15.64) for patients with CP class B. MELD scores were significantly higher post-treatment than pre-treatment, with significant recovery at 24 months. No significant differences were seen between cancer stage and OS, while PFS and cancer stage did show difference between cancer stage 1 and 3 with longer median PFS seen in stage 1.

Conclusions

While our study supports the literature for OS in Y90-treated patients, we found a shorter PFS in this population. This may reflect the differences between the utilization of RECIST in clinical trials and clinical radiology practice in determining progression. Significant factors associated with OS were age, MELD, CP scores and portal vein thrombosis (PVT). For PFS, CP score and stage at diagnosis were significant. Increasing MELD scores over time likely reflected a combination of radioembolization-induced liver disease, liver decompensation or progression of HCC. The downtrend at 24 months is likely due to long term survivors with significant benefit from therapy with no long-term complications from Y90.

AR12 increases BAG3 expression which is essential for Tau and APP degradation via LC3-associated phagocytosis and macroautophagy

We defined the mechanisms by which the chaperone ATPase inhibitor AR12 and the multi-kinase inhibitor neratinib interacted to reduce expression of Tau and amyloid-precursor protein (APP) in microglia and neuronal cells. AR12 and neratinib interacted to increase the phosphorylation of eIF2A S51 and the expression of BAG3, Beclin1 and ATG5, and in parallel, enhanced autophagosome formation and autophagic flux. Knock down of BAG3, Beclin1 or ATG5 abolished autophagosome formation and significantly reduced degradation of p62, LAMP2, Tau, APP, and GRP78 (total and plasma membrane). Knock down of Rubicon, a key component of LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP), significantly reduced autophagosome formation but not autophagic flux and prevented degradation of Tau, APP, and cell surface GRP78, but not ER-localized GRP78. Knock down of Beclin1, ATG5 or Rubicon or over-expression of GRP78 prevented the significant increase in eIF2A phosphorylation. Knock down of eIF2A prevented the increase in BAG3 expression and significantly reduced autophagosome formation, autophagic flux, and it prevented Tau and APP degradation. We conclude that AR12 has the potential to reduce Tau and APP levels in neurons and microglia via the actions of LAP, endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling and macroautophagy. We hypothesize that the initial inactivation of GRP78 catalytic function by AR12 facilitates an initial increase in eIF2A phosphorylation which in turn is essential for greater levels of eIF2A phosphorylation, greater levels of BAG3 and macroautophagy and eventually leading to significant amounts of APP/Tau degradation.

Neratinib as a Potential Therapeutic for Mutant RAS and Osimertinib-Resistant Tumours

Neratinib was developed as an irreversible catalytic inhibitor of ERBB2, which also acts to inhibit ERBB1 and ERBB4. Neratinib is U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved as a neo-adjuvant therapy for use in HER2+ breast cancer. More recently, chemical biology analyses and the authors’ own bench work have demonstrated that neratinib has additional targets, which open up the possibility of using the drug in cell types that either lack ERBB receptor family expression or who rely on survival signalling downstream of growth factor receptors. Neratinib rapidly disrupted mutant RAS nanoclustering, which was followed by mutant rat sarcoma virus proteins translocating via LC3-associated phagocytosis into the cytosol where they were degraded by macroautophagy. Neratinib catalytically inhibited the MAP4K mammalian STE20-like protein kinase 4 and also caused its degradation via macroautophagy. This resulted in ezrin dephosphorylation and the plasma membrane becoming flaccid. Neratinib disrupted the nanoclustering of RAC1, which was associated with dephosphorylation of PAK1 and Merlin, and with increased phosphorylation of the Merlin binding partners large tumour suppressor kinase 1/2, YAP, and TAZ. YAP and TAZ exited the nucleus. Neratinib retained its anti-tumour efficacy against NSCLC cells made resistant to either afatinib or to osimertinib. Collectively, these findings argue that the possibilities for the further development of neratinib as cancer therapeutic in malignancies that do not express or over-express members of the ERBB receptor family are potentially wide-ranging.

BESPOKE IO protocol: a multicentre, prospective observational study evaluating the utility of ctDNA in guiding immunotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumours

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy (IO) has transformed the treatment paradigm for a wide variety of solid tumours. However, assessment of response can be challenging with conventional radiological imaging (eg, iRECIST), which do not precisely capture the unique response patterns of tumours treated with IO. Emerging data suggest that circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) can aid in response assessment in patients with solid tumours receiving IO. The short half-life of ctDNA puts it in a unique position for early treatment response monitoring. The BESPOKE IO study is designed to investigate the clinical utility of serial ctDNA testing to assess treatment response using a tumour-informed, bespoke ctDNA assay (Signatera) and to determine its impact on clinical decision-making with respect to continuation/discontinuation, or escalation/de-escalation of immunotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumours.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The BESPOKE IO is a multicentre, prospective, observational study with a goal to enroll over 1500 patients with solid tumours receiving IO in up to 100 US sites. Patients will be followed for up to 2 years with serial ctDNA analysis, timed with every other treatment cycle. The primary endpoint is to determine the percentage of patients who will have their treatment regimen changed as guided by post-treatment bespoke ctDNA results along with standard response assessment tools. The major secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival and overall response rate based on the ctDNA dynamics.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The BESPOKE IO study was approved by the WCG Institutional Review Board (Natera-20-043-NCP BESPOKE Study of ctDNA Guided Immunotherapy (BESPOKE IO)) on 22 February 2021. Data protection and privacy regulations will be strictly observed in the capturing, forwarding, processing and storing patients' data. Natera will approve the publication of any study results in accordance with the site-specific contract.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04761783.

Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in completely resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (KEYNOTE-716): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Pembrolizumab prolongs progression-free and overall survival among patients with advanced melanoma and recurrence-free survival in resected stage III disease. KEYNOTE-716 assessed pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected, high-risk, stage II melanoma. We report results from the planned first and second interim analyses for recurrence-free survival.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study, involving 160 academic medical centres and hospitals in 16 countries (Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Poland, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA), patients aged 12 years or older with newly diagnosed, completely resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (TNM stage T3b or T4 with a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy) were recruited. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1), in blocks of four and stratified by T-category (3b, 4a, and 4b) and paediatric status (age 12-17 years vs ≥18 years), using an interactive response technology system to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg (2 mg/kg in paediatric patients) or placebo every 3 weeks for 17 cycles or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. All patients, clinical investigators, and analysts were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed recurrence-free survival (defined as time from randomisation to recurrence or death) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all patients randomly assigned to treatment). The primary endpoint was met if recurrence-free survival was significantly improved for pembrolizumab versus placebo at either the first interim analysis (after approximately 128 patients had events) or second interim analysis (after 179 patients had events) under multiplicity control. Safety was assessed in all patients randomly assigned to treatment who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03553836, and is closed to accrual.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 23, 2018, and Nov 4, 2020, 1182 patients were screened, of whom 976 were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab (n=487) or placebo (n=489; ITT population). The median age was 61 years (IQR 52-69) and 387 (40%) patients were female and 589 (60%) were male. 874 (90%) of 976 patients were White and 799 (82%) were not Hispanic or Latino. 483 (99%) of 487 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 486 (99%) of 489 in the placebo group received assigned treatment. At the first interim analysis (data cutoff on Dec 4, 2020; median follow-up of 14·4 months [IQR 10·2-18·7] in the pembrolizumab group and 14·3 months [10·1-18·7] in the placebo group), 54 (11%) of 487 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 82 (17%) of 489 in the placebo group had a first recurrence of disease or died (hazard ratio [HR] 0·65 [95% CI 0·46-0·92]; p=0·0066). At the second interim analysis (data cutoff on June 21, 2021; median follow-up of 20·9 months [16·7-25·3] in the pembrolizumab group and 20·9 months [16·6-25·3] in the placebo group), 72 (15%) patients in the pembrolizumab group and 115 (24%) in the placebo group had a first recurrence or died (HR 0·61 [95% CI 0·45-0·82]). Median recurrence-free survival was not reached in either group at either assessment timepoint. At the first interim analysis, grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 78 (16%) of 483 patients in the pembrolizumab groups versus 21 (4%) of 486 in the placebo group. At the first interim analysis, four patients died from an adverse event, all in the placebo group (one each due to pneumonia, COVID-19-related pneumonia, suicide, and recurrent cancer), and at the second interim analysis, one additional patient, who was in the pembrolizumab group, died from an adverse event (COVID-19-related pneumonia). No deaths due to study treatment occurred.

INTERPRETATION

Pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy for up to approximately 1 year for stage IIB or IIC melanoma resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of disease recurrence or death versus placebo, with a manageable safety profile.

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Multicenter randomized phase II trial of atezolizumab with or without cobimetinib in biliary tract cancers

BACKGROUNDMEK inhibitors have limited activity in biliary tract cancers (BTCs) as monotherapy but are hypothesized to enhance responses to programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition.METHODSThis open-label phase II study randomized patients with BTC to atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) as monotherapy or in combination with cobimetinib (MEK inhibitor). Eligible patients had unresectable BTC with 1 to 2 lines of prior therapy in the metastatic setting, measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status less than or equal to 1. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).RESULTSSeventy-seven patients were randomized and received study therapy. The trial met its primary endpoint, with a median PFS of 3.65 months in the combination arm versus 1.87 months in the monotherapy arm (HR 0.58, 90% CI 0.35-0.93, 1-tail P = 0.027). One patient in the combination arm (3.3%) and 1 patient in the monotherapy arm (2.8%) had a partial response. Combination therapy was associated with more rash, gastrointestinal events, CPK elevations, and thrombocytopenia. Exploratory analysis of tumor biopsies revealed enhanced expression of antigen processing and presentation genes and an increase in CD8/FoxP3 ratios with combination treatment. Patients with higher baseline or lower fold changes in expression of certain inhibitory ligands (LAG3, BTLA, VISTA) on circulating T cells had evidence of greater clinical benefit from the combination.CONCLUSIONThe combination of atezolizumab plus cobimetinib prolonged PFS as compared with atezolizumab monotherapy, but the low response rate in both arms highlights the immune-resistant nature of BTCs.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT03201458.FUNDINGNational Cancer Institute (NCI) Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN); F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.; NCI, NIH (R01 CA228414-01 and UM1CA186691); NCI's Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Gastrointestinal Cancers (P50 CA062924); NIH Center Core Grant (P30 CA006973); and the Passano Foundation.

550 ARTACUS: An open-label, multicenter, phase 1b/2 study of RP1 in solid organ transplant recipients with advanced cutaneous malignancies

Background

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) has emerged as an important lifesaving procedure for patients with a wide range of end-organ diseases characterized by dysfunction or specific organ function failure. SOT rejection is a major complication requiring patients (pts) to undergo lifelong immunosuppression to prevent allograft rejection.1Skin cancers (SCs) including cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) are common post transplant malignancies.2 SC in SOT pts is generally managed with surgical resection, radiation therapy and chemotherapy or targeted therapy. Use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in SOT recipients has improved outcomes but are associated with the high risk of allograft rejection.3–5 Thus, there is a high unmet need for a safe and effective treatment that also protects pts from allograft rejection. RP1 is an oncolytic virus (HSV-1) that expresses a fusogenic glycoprotein (GALV-GP R-) and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF). In preclinical studies, RP1 induced immunogenic tumor cell death and provided potent systemic anti-tumor activity6 and clinical data in combination with nivolumab has demonstrated a high rate of deep and durable response in patients with advanced SCs.7 The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of single agent RP1 in kidney and liver transplant recipients with SCs, with focus on CSCC. After determining the safety and tolerability in the initial cohort with kidney and liver transplants the study may also enroll heart and lung transplant recipients.

Methods

This study will enroll up to 65 evaluable allograft transplantation pts with locally advanced or metastatic SCs. Key inclusion criteria are pts with confirmed recurrent, locally advanced or metastatic CSCC and up to 10 pts with non-CSCC SC, stable allograft function and ECOG performance status of ≤1. Pts with prior systemic anti-cancer treatment are allowed. Key exclusion criteria are prior treatment with an oncolytic therapy, active herpetic infections or prior complications of HSV-1 infection and a history of organ graft rejection within 12 months. Pts will receive an initial dose of 1 x 10^6 plaque-forming units (PFU) of RP1. Two weeks later they will receive 1 x 10^7 PFU of RP1 and continue every two weeks until pre-specified study endpoints are met. RP1 will be administered by intra-tumoral injection including through imaging guidance as clinically appropriate. The primary objective of the trial is to assess efficacy determined by ORR and safety of single agent RP1. Additional secondary endpoints include DOR, CR, DCR, PFS and OS.

Trial Registration

NCT04349436

References

Frohn C, Fricke L, Puchta JC, Kirchner H. The effect of HLA-C matching on acute renal transplant rejection. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001;16(2):355–60.

Madeleine MM, Patel NS, Plasmeijer EI, Engels EA, Bouwes Bavinck JN, Toland AE, Green AC; the Keratinocyte Carcinoma Consortium (KeraCon) Immunosuppression Working Group. Epidemiology of keratinocyte carcinomas after organ transplantation. Br J Dermatol 2017;177(5):1208–1216.

Spain L, Higgins R, Gopalakrishnan K, Turajlic S, Gore M, Larkin J. Acute renal allograft rejection after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for metastatic melanoma. Ann Oncol 2016;27(6):1135–1137.

Herz S, Höfer T, Papapanagiotou M, Leyh JC, Meyenburg S, Schadendorf D, Ugurel S, Roesch A, Livingstone E, Schilling B, Franklin C. Checkpoint inhibitors in chronic kidney failure and an organ transplant recipient. Eur J Cancer 2016;67:66-72.

Kittai AS, Oldham H, Cetnar J, Taylor M. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in organ transplant ptss. J Immunother 2017;40(7):277–281.

Thomas S, Kuncheria L, Roulstone V, Kyula JN, Mansfield D, Bommareddy PK, Smith H, Kaufman HL, Harrington KJ, Coffin RS. Development of a new fusion-enhanced oncolytic immunotherapy platform based on herpes simplex virus type 1. J Immunother Cancer 2019 10;7(1):214.

Middleton M, Aroldi F, Sacco J, Milhem M, Curti B, Vanderwalde A, Baum S, Samson A, Pavlick A, Chesney J, Niu J, Rhodes T, Bowles T, Conry R, Olsson-Brown A, Earl-Laux D, Kaufman H, Bommareddy P, Deterding A, Samakoglu S, Coffin R, Harrington K. 422 An open-label, multicenter, phase 1/2 clinical trial of RP1, an enhanced potency oncolytic HSV, combined with nivolumab: updated results from the skin cancer cohorts. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8(3): doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-SITC2020.0422

Ethics Approval

The study was approved by institutional review board or the local ethics committee at each participating site. Informed consent was obtained from patients before participating in the trial.

Axitinib and HDAC Inhibitors Interact to Kill Sarcoma Cells

We have extended our analyses of HDAC inhibitor biology in sarcoma. The multi-kinase inhibitor axitinib interacted with multiple HDAC inhibitors to kill sarcoma cells. Axitinib and HDAC inhibitors interacted in a greater than additive fashion to inactivate AKT, mTORC1 and mTORC2, and to increase Raptor S722/S792 phosphorylation. Individually, all drugs increased phosphorylation of ATM S1981, AMPKα T172, ULK1 S317 and ATG13 S318 and reduced ULK1 S757 phosphorylation; this correlated with enhanced autophagic flux. Increased phosphorylation of ULK1 S317 and of Raptor S722/S792 required ATM-AMPK signaling. ULK1 S757 is a recognized site for mTORC1 and knock down of either ATM or AMPKα reduced the drug-induced dephosphorylation of this site. Combined exposure of cells to axitinib and an HDAC inhibitor significantly reduced the expression of HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, HDAC4, HDAC6 and HDAC7. No response was observed for HDACs 10 and 11. Knock down of ULK1, Beclin1 or ATG5 prevented the decline in HDAC expression, as did expression of a constitutively active mTOR protein. Axitinib combined with HDAC inhibitors enhanced expression of Class I MHCA and reduced expression of PD-L1 which was recapitulated via knock down studies, particularly of HDACs 1 and 3. In vivo, axitinib and the HDAC inhibitor entinostat interacted to significantly reduce tumor growth. Collectively our findings support the exploration of axitinib and HDAC inhibitors being developed as a novel sarcoma therapy.

Neratinib kills B-RAF V600E melanoma via ROS-dependent autophagosome formation and death receptor signaling

Melanoma cells expressing mutant B-RAF V600E are susceptible to treatment with the combination of a B-RAF inhibitor and a MEK1/2 inhibitor. We investigated the impact of the ERBB family and MAP4K inhibitor neratinib on the biology of PDX isolates of cutaneous melanoma expressing B-RAF V600E. Neratinib synergized with HDAC inhibitors to kill melanoma cells at their physiologic concentrations. Neratinib activated ATM, AMPK, ULK1, and PERK and inactivated mTORC1/2, ERK1/2, eIF2 alpha, and STAT3. Neratinib increased expression of Beclin1, ATG5, CD95, and FAS-L and decreased levels of multiple toxic BH3 domain proteins, MCL1, BCL-XL, FLIP-s, and ERBB1/2/4. ATG13 S318 phosphorylation and autophagosome formation was dependent upon ATM, and activation of ATM was dependent on reactive oxygen species. Reduced expression of ERBB1/2/4 required autophagosome formation and reduced MCL1/BCL-XL levels required eIF2 alpha phosphorylation. Maximal levels of eIF2 alpha phosphorylation required signaling by ATM-AMPK and autophagosome formation. Knock down of eIF2 alpha, CD95, FAS-L, Beclin1, and ATG5 or over-expression of FLIP-s significantly reduced killing. Combined knock down of Beclin1 and CD95 abolished cell death. Our data demonstrate that PDX melanoma cells expressing B-RAF V600E are susceptible to being killed by neratinib and more so when combined with HDACi.

Inhibition of heat shock proteins increases autophagosome formation, and reduces the expression of APP, Tau, SOD1 G93A and TDP-43

Aberrant expression and denaturation of Tau, amyloid-beta and TDP-43 can lead to cell death and is a major component of pathologies such as Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). AD neurons exhibit a reduced ability to form autophagosomes and degrade proteins via autophagy. Using genetically manipulated colon cancer cells we determined whether drugs that directly inhibit the chaperone ATPase activity or cause chaperone degradation and endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling leading to macroautophagy could reduce the levels of these proteins. The antiviral chaperone ATPase inhibitor AR12 reduced the ATPase activities and total expression of GRP78, HSP90, and HSP70, and of Tau, Tau 301L, APP, APP692, APP715, SOD1 G93A and TDP-43. In parallel, it increased the phosphorylation of ATG13 S318 and eIF2A S51 and caused eIF2A-dependent autophagosome formation and autophagic flux. Knock down of Beclin1 or ATG5 prevented chaperone, APP and Tau degradation. Neratinib, used to treat HER2+ breast cancer, reduced chaperone levels and expression of Tau and APP via macroautophagy, and neratinib interacted with AR12 to cause further reductions in protein levels. The autophagy-regulatory protein ATG16L1 is expressed as two isoforms, T300 or A300: Africans trend to express T300 and Europeans A300. We observed higher basal expression of Tau in T300 cells when compared to isogenic A300 cells. ATG16L1 isoform expression did not alter basal levels of HSP90, HSP70 or HSP27, however, basal levels of GRP78 were reduced in A300 cells. The abilities of both AR12 and neratinib to stimulate ATG13 S318 and eIF2A S51 phosphorylation and autophagic flux was also reduced in A300 cells. Our data support further evaluation of AR12 and neratinib in neuronal cells as repurposed treatments for AD.

Osimertinib-resistant NSCLC cells activate ERBB2 and YAP/TAZ and are killed by neratinib

We performed additional mechanistic analyses to redefine neratinib biology and determined the mechanisms by which the multi-kinase inhibitor neratinib interacted with the thymidylate synthase inhibitor pemetrexed to kill NSCLC cells expressing either mutant KRAS (G12S; Q61H; G12A; G12C) or mutant NRAS (Q61K) or mutant ERBB1 (L858R; L858R T790M; exon 19 deletion). Neratinib rapidly reduced KRASG12V and RAC1G12V nanoclustering which was followed by KRASG12V, but not RAC1G12V, being extensively mislocalized away from the plasma membrane. This correlated with reduced levels of, and reorganized membrane localization of phosphatidylserine and cholesterol. Reduced nanoclustering was not associated with inactivation of ERBB1, Merlin or Ezrin. The drug combination killed cells expressing mutant KRAS, NRAS or mutant ERBB1 proteins. Afatinib or osimertinib resistant cells were killed with a similar efficacy to non-resistant cells. Compared to osimertinib-resistant cells, sensitive cells had less ERBB2 Y1248 phosphorylation. In osimertinib resistant H1975 cells, the drug combination was less capable of inactivating AKT, mTOR, STAT3, STAT5, ERK1/2 whereas it gained the ability to inactivate ERBB3. In resistant H1650 cells, the drug combination was less capable of inactivating JAK2 and STAT5. Sensitive cells exhibited elevated basal phosphorylation of YAP and TAZ. In resistant cells, portions of YAP and TAZ were localized in the nucleus. [Neratinib + pemetrexed] increased phosphorylation of YAP and TAZ, caused their nuclear exit, and enhanced ERBB2 degradation. Thus, neratinib targets an unidentified protein whose functional inhibition directly results in RAS inactivation and tumor cell killing. Our data prove that, albeit indirectly, oncogenic RAS proteins are druggable by neratinib.

Effect of Taxane Chemotherapy With or Without Indoximod in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) causes tumor immune suppression. The IDO1 pathway inhibitor indoximod combined with a taxane in patients with ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer was tested in a prospective clinical trial.

Objective

To assess clinical outcomes in patients with ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer treated with indoximod plus a taxane.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This phase 2 double-blinded randomized 1:1 placebo-controlled clinical trial enrolled patients at multiple international centers from August 26, 2013, to January 25, 2016. Eligibility criteria included ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer, ability to receive taxane therapy, good performance status, normal organ function, no previous immunotherapy use, and no autoimmune disease. The study was discontinued in June 2017 because of lack of efficacy. Data analysis was performed from February 2019 to April 2020.

Interventions

A taxane (paclitaxel [80 mg/m2] weekly 3 weeks on, 1 week off, or docetaxel [75 mg/m2] every 3 weeks) plus placebo or indoximod (1200 mg) orally twice daily as first-line treatment.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points were median overall survival, objective response rate, and toxic effects. A sample size of 154 patients would detect a hazard ratio of 0.64 with 1-sided α = .1 and β = .2 after 95 events. Archival tumor tissue was stained with immunohistochemistry for IDO1 expression as an exploratory analysis.

Results

Of 209 patients enrolled, 169 were randomized and 164 were treated (85 in the indoximod arm; 79 in the placebo arm). The median (range) age was 58 (29-85) years; 166 (98.2%) were female, and 135 (79.9%) were White. The objective response rate was 40% and 37%, respectively (indoximod vs placebo) (P = .74). The median (range) follow-up time was 17.4 (0.1-39.4) months. The median PFS was 6.8 months (95% CI, 4.8-8.9) in the indoximod arm and 9.5 months (95% CI, 7.8-11.2) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8-1.8). Differences between the experimental and placebo arms in median PFS (6.8 vs 9.5 months) and overall survival (19.5 vs 20.6 months) were not statistically significant. Grade 3 or greater treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 60% of patients in both arms.

Conclusions and Relevance

This randomized clinical trial found that, among patients with ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer, addition of indoximod to a taxane did not improve PFS compared with a taxane alone.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01792050.

AR12 (OSU-03012) suppresses GRP78 expression and inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication

AR12 is a derivative of celecoxib which no-longer acts against COX2 but instead inhibits the ATPase activity of multiple chaperone proteins, in particular GRP78. GRP78 acts as a sensor of endoplasmic reticulum stress and is an essential chaperone required for the life cycle of all mammalian viruses. We and others previously demonstrated in vitro and in vivo that AR12 increases autophagosome formation and autophagic flux, enhances virus protein degradation, preventing virus reproduction, and prolonging the survival of infected animals. In this report, we determined whether AR12 could act against SARS-CoV-2. In a dose-dependent fashion AR12 inhibited SARS-CoV-2 spike protein expression in transfected or infected cells. AR12 suppressed the production of infectious virions via autophagosome formation, which was also associated with degradation of GRP78. After AR12 exposure, the colocalization of GRP78 with spike protein was reduced. Knock down of eIF2α prevented AR12-induced spike degradation and knock down of Beclin1 or ATG5 caused the spike protein to localize in LAMP2+ vesicles without apparent degradation. HCT116 cells expressing ATG16L1 T300, found in the majority of persons of non-European descent, particularly from Africa, expressed greater amounts of GRP78 and SARS-CoV-2 receptor angiotensin converting enzyme 2 compared to ATG16L1 A300, predominantly found in Europeans, suggestive that ATG16L1 T300 expression may be associated with a greater ability to be infected and to reproduce SARS-CoV-2. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that AR12 represents a clinically relevant anti-viral drug for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2.

Abstract OT1-01-02: Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + decitabine followed by standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced HER2-breast cancer

Background: Higher levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in breast cancers are associated with increased likelihood of pathologic complete response (pCR) to chemotherapy and improved outcomes. DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) can augment immune responses to cancers by upregulating tumor antigen expression, increasing MHC Class I expression and antigen presentation, decreasing numbers and activity of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and increasing responsiveness of T lymphocytes. We have shown that decitabine augments the effectiveness of immunotherapy against murine triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Trial design: Patients with HER-2-negative breast cancer who are candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy will receive decitabine (15 mg/kg x 4 doses over 5 days) followed by 2 doses of pembrolizumab (200 mg, 2 weeks apart) prior to starting neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Two research biopsies are obtained - 1 prior to the window immunotherapy and 1 afterwards, prior to starting chemotherapy. Chemotherapy regimens: TNBC - ddAC X 4 followed by weekly Taxol + Carboplatin X 12; HR+ - ddAC X 4 followed by weekly Taxol X 12. After the safely lead-in, the sequence of regimens can be reversed, per treating physician preference.

Safety Lead-In: During immunotherapy and dose-dense AC in the first 11 patients enrolled and who have received at least 3 doses of decitabine and at least 1 dose of pembrolizumab, clinically significant immune related adverse events (irAEs) will be reported in an expedited manner. Accrual was halted until the safety lead-in phase was completed.

Brief Eligibility criteria: Primary breast cancer, candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Cohort A:

TNBC (ER<10%, PR<10%, Her-2 negative)

cT2, N1 or N2

cT2, 3-5 cm, N0

Any T3 or T4

Cohort B:

ER+ or PR+, Her-2 negative

cT2, N1 or N2

Any T3 or T4ECOG status 0-1

No Active autoimmune diseases

Absence of metastatic disease too extensive to consider surgery for the primary

Specific aims:

Primary endpoint:

Changes in Lymphocyte infiltration - by 10-15%

Tumor area

Stromal area

Secondary endpoints:

Gene expression (Nanostring)

Multiplex Cell Markers (DAPI/CD4/CD8/FOXP3/CK/PDL1/PDL2, and MDSCs)

pCR

Percentage of patients with lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer

Correlation of PD-L1 expression with pCR

MDSC in blood samples pre- and post- window portion

Sample Size and Statistical methods: Cohort A (TNBC) is the primary target group in this trial. When Cohort A has achieved its required sample size of 28 evaluable patients, Cohort B (HR+) will be closed to accrual irrespective of accrual to that cohort. However, in the unlikely event that accrual to Cohort B occurs at a faster rate than in Cohort A, Cohort B will be capped at 18 patients. Therefore, the projected sample size for this study is 32-50 patients. A one-sided paired t-test will be used to compare baseline and post-treatment percentage of tumor and stromal areas with infiltrating lymphocytes. The paired t-test will be applied separately to Cohorts A and B.

Present accrual and target accrual: 12 subjects have been accrued; 1 withdrew prior to any protocol therapy. The 11 patient safety lead-in has been completed. As described above, the projected total sample size is 32-50 patients.

Citation Format: Harry Douglas Bear, Michael O. Idowu, Andrew Poklepovic, Adam Sima, Maciej Kmieciak. Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + decitabine followed by standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced HER2-breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-01-02.

Fingolimod Augments Monomethylfumarate Killing of GBM Cells

Previously we demonstrated that the multiple sclerosis drug dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and its plasma breakdown product MMF could interact with chemotherapeutic agents to kill both GBM cells and activated microglia. The trial NCT02337426 demonstrated the safety of DMF in newly diagnosed GBM patients when combined with the standard of care Stupp protocol. We hypothesized that another multiple sclerosis drug, fingolimod (FTY720) would synergize with MMF to kill GBM cells. MMF and fingolimod interacted in a greater than additive fashion to kill PDX GBM isolates. MMF and fingolimod radiosensitized glioma cells and enhanced the lethality of temozolomide. Exposure to [MMF + fingolimod] activated an ATM-dependent toxic autophagy pathway, enhanced protective endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling, and inactivated protective PI3K, STAT, and YAP function. The drug combination reduced the expression of protective c-FLIP-s, MCL-1, BCL-XL, and in parallel caused cell-surface clustering of the death receptor CD95. Knock down of CD95 or over-expression of c-FLIP-s or BCL-XL suppressed killing. Fingolimod and MMF interacted in a greater than additive fashion to rapidly enhance reactive oxygen species production and over-expression of either thioredoxin or super-oxide dismutase two significantly reduced the drug-induced phosphorylation of ATM, autophagosome formation and [MMF + fingolimod] lethality. In contrast, the production of ROS was only marginally reduced in cells lacking ATM, CD95, or Beclin1. Collectively, our data demonstrate that the primary generation of ROS by [MMF + fingolimod] plays a key role, via the induction of toxic autophagy and death receptor signaling, in the killing of GBM cells.

(Curcumin+sildenafil) enhances the efficacy of 5FU and anti-PD1 therapies in vivo

We have extended our analyses of (curcumin+sildenafil) biology. The drug combination caused vascularization and degradation of mutant K-RAS that correlated with reduced phosphorylation of ERK1/2, AKT T308, mTORC1, mTORC2, ULK1 S757, STAT3, STAT5, and NFκB and increased phosphorylation of eIF2α, ATM, AMPKα, ULK1 S317; all concomitant with elevated ATG13 S318 phosphorylation and autophagosome formation. Prior studies with drug combinations utilizing sildenafil have delineated an ATM-AMPK-ULK1 S317 pathway and an AKT-mTOR-ULK1 S757 pathway as modules which control ATG S318 phosphorylation and autophagosome formation. The knockdown of PKG reduced cell killing as well as reducing drug-enhanced phosphorylation of ATM, AMPKα, and ATG13. In the absence of PKG, no significant increase in ULK1 S317 phosphorylation was observed. In a Beclin1-dependent fashion, the drug combination reduced the expression of multiple histone deacetylase (HDAC) proteins, including HDAC2 and HDAC3. Molecular knockdown of HDAC2, HDAC3, and especially (HDAC2+HDAC3) significantly reduced the expression of PD-L1 and elevated expression of Class I human major histocompatibility complex. In vivo, (curcumin+sildenafil) enhanced the efficacy of 5-flurouracil against CT26 colorectal tumors. Prior exposure of established CT26 tumors to (curcumin+sildenafil) significantly enhanced the efficacy of a subsequently administered anti-PD-1 antibody. Collectively our data argue that (curcumin+sildenafil) has the potential in several settings to be an efficacious neoadjuvant therapy for colon cancer.

Neratinib degrades MST4 via autophagy that reduces membrane stiffness and is essential for the inactivation of PI3K, ERK1/2, and YAP/TAZ signaling

The irreversible ERBB1/2/4 inhibitor neratinib causes plasma membrane-associated K-RAS to mislocalize into intracellular vesicles liminal to the plasma membrane; this effect is enhanced by HDAC inhibitors and is now a Phase I trial (NCT03919292). The combination of neratinib and HDAC inhibitors killed pancreatic cancer and lymphoma T cells. Neratinib plus HDAC inhibitor exposure was as efficacious as (paclitaxel+gemcitabine) at killing pancreatic cancer cells. Neratinib reduced the phosphorylation of PAK1, Merlin, LATS1/2, AKT, mTOR, p70 S6K, and ERK1/2 which required expression of Rubicon, Beclin1, and Merlin. Neratinib altered pancreatic tumor cell morphology which was associated with MST4 degradation reduced Ezrin phosphorylation and enhanced phosphorylation of MAP4K4 and LATS1/2. Knockdown of the MAP4K4 activator and sensor of membrane rigidity RAP2A reduced basal LATS1/2 and YAP phosphorylation but did not prevent neratinib from stimulating LATS1/2 or YAP phosphorylation. Beclin1 knockdown prevented MST4 degradation, Ezrin dephosphorylation and neratinib-induced alterations in tumor cell morphology. Our findings demonstrate that neratinib enhances LATS1/2 phosphorylation independently of RAP2A/MAP4K4 and that MST4 degradation and Ezrin dephosphorylation may represent a universal trigger for the biological actions of neratinib.

Enhanced signaling via ERBB3/PI3K plays a compensatory survival role in pancreatic tumor cells exposed to [neratinib + valproate]

The ERBB1/2/4 inhibitor neratinib causes plasma membrane-associated K-RAS to mislocalize into intracellular vesicles; this effect is enhanced by HDAC inhibitors and the combination of [neratinib + sodium valproate] is now a phase I trial (NCT03919292). The present studies were performed to understand resistance mechanisms that evolve following [neratinib + valproate] exposure. Exposure of pancreatic tumor cells to [neratinib + sodium valproate] initially reduced the expression and phosphorylation of ERBB family receptors, c-MET and c-KIT. Following a 24 h drug exposure and a further 24 h culture in drug free conditions, the effects on c-MET, c-KIT and most ERBB family receptors had returned to near baseline levels. However, the expression and phosphorylation of ERBB3 were increased which was associated with elevated AKT T308 phosphorylation. Knock down of ERBB3 significantly enhanced [neratinib + valproate] lethality, which was associated with greater inactivation of AKT, mTOR, p70 S6K and ERK1/2. The PI3Kα/δ inhibitor copanlisib also significantly enhanced killing after [neratinib + valproate] exposure. Copanlisib enhanced [neratinib + valproate] lethality via autophagosome formation and autophagic flux. Our data argue for further in vivo exploration as to whether copanlisib can be safely combined with [neratinib + valproate].

KEYNOTE-716: Phase III study of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected high-risk stage II melanoma

Patients with high-risk stage II melanoma are at significant risk for recurrence after surgical resection. Adjuvant treatment options to lower the risk for distant metastases are limited. Although adjuvant IFN-α2b is associated with improved relapse-free survival in patients with high-risk melanoma, toxicity and limited overall survival benefits limit its use. Adjuvant treatment with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival, compared with placebo, in patients with resected stage III melanoma in the Phase III KEYNOTE-054 trial; efficacy in patients with stage II disease has not been established. This article describes the design and rationale of KEYNOTE-716 (NCT03553836), a two-part, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase III study of adjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with surgically resected high-risk stage II melanoma. Clinical trial registry & ID: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03553836.

Not the comfy chair! Cancer drugs that act against multiple active sites

Introduction: Discoveries of novel signal transduction pathways in the 1990s stimulated drug companies to develop small molecule tyrosine kinase and serine / threonine kinase inhibitors which were based on catalytic site inhibition. All kinases bind ATP and catalyze phosphate transfer and, therefore, inhibitors that block ATP binding and its metabolism would be predicted to have a known on-target specificity but were also likely to have many unknown or unrecognized targets due to similarities in all ATP binding pockets. This on-target off-target biology of kinase inhibitors, which exhibit a "signal" in the clinic, means that therapeutically valuable agents are acting through unknown biological processes to mediate their anti-tumor effects.Areas covered: This perspective discusses drug therapies whose actions cannot be explained by their actions on the original targeted kinase; it concludes with a methodology to screen for changes in cell signaling via in-cell western immunoblotting.Expert opinion: Most malignancies do not depend on survival signaling from one specific mutated proto-oncogene, especially for previously treated malignancies where multiple clonal variants of the primary tumor have evolved. Hence, the concept of a highly "personalized medicine" approach fails because it is unlikely that a specific therapy will kill all clonal variants of the tumor.

Signaling alterations caused by drugs and autophagy

Autophagy is an evolutionary conserved process that recycles cellular materials in times of nutrient restriction to maintain viability. In cancer therapeutics, the role of autophagy in response to multi-kinase inhibitors, alone or when combined with histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors acts, generally, to facilitate the killing of tumor cells. Furthermore, the formation of autophagosomes and subsequent degradation of their contents can reduce the expression of HDAC proteins themselves as well as of other signaling regulatory molecules such as protein chaperones and mutated RAS proteins. Reduced levels of HDAC6 causes the acetylation and inactivation of heat shock protein 90, and, together with reduced expression of the chaperones HSP70 and GRP78, generates a strong endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response. Prolonged intense ER stress signaling causes tumor cell death. Reduced expression of HDACs 1, 2 and 3 causes the levels of programed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) to decline and the expression of Class I MHCA to increase which correlates with elevated immunogenicity of the tumor cells in vivo. This review will specifically focus on the downstream implications that result from autophagic-degradation of HDACs, RAS and protein chaperones.

The Lethality of [Pazopanib + HDAC Inhibitors] Is Enhanced by Neratinib

Sarcomas are a diverse set of malignancies. For soft tissue sarcomas, the kinase and chaperone inhibitor pazopanib is a standard of care therapeutic. Previously, we demonstrated that HDAC inhibitors enhanced pazopanib lethality against sarcoma and other tumor cell types in vitro and in vivo. The present studies defined mechanisms of drug-combination resistance. Exposure of sarcoma and PDX ovarian carcinoma cells to [pazopanib + entinostat] caused a prolonged activation of ERBB1 and transient/prolonged activations of ERBB2, c-KIT, and c-MET, in a cell-specific fashion. The activities of mTORC1, mTORC2, GRP78, HSP90, and HSP70 were reduced, expression of Beclin1 and ATG5 enhanced, and the ATM-AMPK-ULK1-ATG13-Beclin1/ATG5 pathway activated. Inhibition of ERBB1/2/4 using neratinib or of c-MET using crizotinib significantly enhanced [pazopanib + entinostat] lethality. For neratinib with [pazopanib + entinostat], this effect correlated with reduced phosphorylation and expression of ERBB1, ERBB2, c-KIT, and c-MET and reduced expression, regardless of mutational status, of N-RAS and K-RAS. [Pazopanib + entinostat + neratinib] reduced the phosphorylation of the Hippo pathway proteins MST1/3/4 and MOB1 whereas this treatment increased the phosphorylation of LATS1, YAP, and TAZ. The activation of ATM, ULK-1, and eIF2α was further enhanced by [pazopanib + entinostat + neratinib] as was the expression of ATG5 and Beclin1. Compared to other manipulations, knock down of eIF2α or over-expression of BCL-XL significantly reduced killing by the three-drug interaction. In vivo, pazopanib and entinostat, and also neratinib and entinostat, both combined to significantly suppress the growth of sarcoma tumors.

Abstract 3304: CNS metastases in prostate cancer: an analysis of SEER database

Metastases to central nervous system (CNS) from various solid tumors, such as lung cancer (40-50%), breast cancer (15-25%) and melanoma (5-20%), are relatively common and confer a poor prognosis. CNS metastases from prostate cancer are uncommon. Due to the rarity of this disease and lack of studies, little is known about the clinical and pathological characteristics as well as outcome of these patients. CNS metastases also have therapeutic implications in terms of targeting hypothalamic-pituitary axis for androgen deprivation as well as CNS penetration of systemic chemotherapy agents. The objective of this study is to analyze clinicopathologic features and outcome of prostate cancer patients with CNS metastases in Survival, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database. Between 2010 and 2015, a total of 23,776 patients with metastatic prostate were identified. Among them, 23,468 cases were adenocarcinoma and 308 cases were prostate cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation. A number of variables, including age, race, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, and prior radiotherapy, site of metastases were extracted. Primary outcome were overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS). CNS metastases were identified in 208 (0.89%) and 11 (3.57%) patients with adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumor, respectively. Majority of patients (56.2%) were 65 years or older. Median OS and DSS were 13 months and 14 months, respectively. In comparison to patients with lymph nodes metastases only (n=8,103), the median OS and DSS were 40 months and 58 months, respectively. In patients with bone dominant metastasis (n=14,407), the median OS and DSS were 27 months and 34 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified age was an adverse predictive factor in patients with CNS metastasis. Race, high Gleason score (≥9), high PSA level (≥98ng/ml) and prior radiotherapy were not associated with OS and DSS. In conclusion, CNS metastases are more common in neuroendocrine tumor than in adenocarcinoma of prostate, and it confers poor survival outcome irrespective of histological subtypes. OS and DSS were worse in patients with prostate cancer and CNS metastases compared to those with lymph node metastases only or bone-dominant metastases.

Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting.

Citation Format: Lin Mei, Taha Al-Juhaishi, Andrew Poklepovic, Asit Paul. CNS metastases in prostate cancer: an analysis of SEER database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3304.

Approaches to High-Risk Resected Stage II and III Melanoma

Over the last decade, several therapies, including both targeted and immune checkpoint inhibitors, have dramatically changed the treatment landscape for patients with metastatic melanoma. These same therapies are now being used in the adjuvant setting with the hope of delaying or preventing the development of metastatic disease. Although phase III trials have shown a clear benefit for patients with resected bulky nodal disease, treatment decisions for patients with earlier-stage (high-risk stage II and stage IIIA) melanoma in the adjuvant setting are less straightforward given the small number of patients studied so far. Among patients with stage IIIB and worse disease, both targeted and immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown benefit in recurrence-free survival. Although a head-to-head comparison has not been completed, patient and tumor characteristics can guide the optimal treatment of an individual.

Neratinib and entinostat combine to rapidly reduce the expression of K-RAS, N-RAS, Gαq and Gα11 and kill uveal melanoma cells

There is no efficacious standard of care therapy for uveal melanoma. Unlike cutaneous disease, uveal melanoma does not exhibit RAS mutations but instead contains mutations with ~90% penetrance in either Gα_q or Gα₁₁. Previously we demonstrated that neratinib caused ERBB1/2/4 and RAS internalization into autolysosomes which resulted in their proteolytic degradation. In PDX isolates of uveal melanoma, neratinib caused the internalization and degradation of Gα_q and Gα₁₁ in parallel with ERBB1 breakdown. These effects were enhanced by the HDAC inhibitor entinostat. Similar data were obtained using GFP/RFP tagged forms of K-RAS V12. Down regulation of Gα_q and Gα₁₁ expression and RAS-GFP/RFP fluorescence required Beclin1 and ATG5. The [neratinib + entinostat] combination engaged multiple pathways to mediate killing. One was from ROS-dependent activation of ATM via AMPK-ULK1-ATG13-Beclin1/ATG5. Another pathway was from CD95 via caspase 8-RIP1/RIP3. A third was from reduced expression of HSP70, HSP90, HDAC6 and phosphorylation of eIF2α. Downstream of the mitochondrion both caspase 9 and AIF played roles in tumor cell execution. Knock down of ATM/AMPK/ULK-1 prevented ATG13 phosphorylation and degradation of RAS and Gα proteins. Over-expression of activated mTOR prevented ATG13 phosphorylation and suppressed killing. Knock down of eIF2α maintained BCL-XL and MCL-1 expression. Within 6h, [neratinib + entinostat] reduced the expression of the immunology biomarkers PD-L1, ODC, IDO-1 and enhanced MHCA levels. Our data demonstrate that [neratinib + entinostat] down-regulates oncogenic RAS and the two key oncogenic drivers present in most uveal melanoma patients and causes a multifactorial form of killing via mitochondrial dysfunction and toxic autophagy. Abbreviations: ERK: extracellular regulated kinase; PI3K: phosphatidyl inositol 3 kinase; ca: constitutively active; dn: dominant negative; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; AIF: apoptosis inducing factor; AMPK: AMP-dependent protein kinase; mTOR: mammalian target of rapamycin; JAK: Janus Kinase; STAT: Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription; MAPK: mitogen activated protein kinase; PTEN: phosphatase and tensin homologue on chromosome ten; ROS: reactive oxygen species; CMV: empty vector plasmid or virus; si: small interfering; SCR: scrambled; IP: immunoprecipitation; VEH: vehicle; HDAC: histone deacetylase.

Fingolimod augments Pemetrexed killing of non-small cell lung cancer and overcomes resistance to ERBB inhibition

Overall, NSCLC has a poor 5-year survival and new therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. ERBB-addicted NSCLC that have become resistant to ERBB inhibitors are often refractory to additional therapeutic interventions. The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator fingolimod (FTY720), approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis, synergized with the NSCLC therapeutic pemetrexed to kill NSCLC and ovarian cancer cells. This occurred in lung cancer cells expressing mutated K-RAS, mutated ERBB1, or in NSCLC cells resistant to afatinib (an ERBB1/2/4 inhibitor). This drug combination appeared to use overlapping and distinct mechanisms of killing in different cell lines. Activation of AMP-dependent kinase (AMPK) and reduced expression and inactivation of mTOR were associated with increased autophagosome and autolysosome formation. Downregulation of Beclin1 considerably reduced formation of autophagosomes and protected the cells from drug combination-induced killing without significantly altering autolysosome formation. Autophagy protein 5 (ATG5) knock down afforded greater protection against the combination of pemetrexed with fingolimod. Treatment of cells with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus markedly enhanced the lethality of pemetrexed plus fingolimod combination. Our data suggest that the combination of fingolimod with the established NSCLC/ovarian cancer drug pemetrexed should be explored as a new therapy.

Neratinib augments the lethality of [regorafenib + sildenafil]

Regorafenib is approved for the treatment of colorectal cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. In the trial NCT02466802, we have discovered that regorafenib can be safely combined with the phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor sildenafil in advanced solid tumor patients. The present studies determined whether the approved ERBB1/2/4 and RAS downregulating drug neratinib, could enhance the lethality of [regorafenib + sildenafil]. Neratinib enhanced [regorafenib + sildenafil] lethality in a greater than additive fashion in colon cancer cells. The drug combination reduced the expression of mutant K-RAS and of multiple histone deacetylase (HDAC) proteins that required autophagosome formation. It caused green fluorescent protein or red fluorescent protein-tagged forms of K-RAS V12 to localize into large intracellular vesicles. Compared with [regorafenib + sildenafil], the three-drug combination caused greater and more prolonged activation of the ATM-AMPK-ULK-1 pathway and caused a greater suppression and prolonged inactivation of mammalian target of rapamycin, AKT, and p70 S6K. Approximately 70% of enhanced lethality caused by neratinib required ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM)-AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMPK) signaling whereas knockdown of Beclin1, ATG5, FADD, and CD95 completely prevented the elevated killing effect. Exposure of cells to [regorafenib + sildenafil] reduced the expression of the checkpoint immunotherapy biomarkers programmed death-ligand 1, ornithine decarboxylase, and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 and increased the expression of major histocompatibility complex A (MHCA), which also required autophagosome formation. Knockdown of specific HDAC proteins recapitulated the effects observed using chemical agents. In vivo, using mouse cancer models, neratinib significantly enhanced the antitumor efficacy of [regorafenib + sildenafil]. Our data support performing a new three drug Phase I trial combining regorafenib, sildenafil, and neratinib.

Palbociclib augments Neratinib killing of tumor cells that is further enhanced by HDAC inhibition

Cancers expressing mutant RAS are associated with a weaker response to chemotherapy and a shorter overall patient survival. We have demonstrated that the irreversible inhibitor of ERBB1/2/4, neratinib, inhibits ERBB1/2/4 and causes their internalization and autolysosomal degradation. Fellow-traveler membrane proteins with RTKs, including mutant K-/N-RAS, were also degraded. We discovered that the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib increased autophagosome and then autolysosome levels in a time dependent fashion, did not reduce mTOR activity, and interacted with temsirolimus to kill. Neratinib and palbociclib interacted in a greater than additive manner to increase autophagosome and then autolysosome levels in a time dependent fashion, and to cause tumor cell killing. Killing required the expression of ATM and AMPKα, Beclin1 and ATG5, BAX and BAK and of AIF, but not of caspase 9. In some cells over-expression of BCL-XL was protective whereas in others it was ineffective. The lethality of [neratinib + palbociclib] was modestly enhanced by the PDE5 inhibitor sildenafil and strongly enhanced by the HDAC inhibitor sodium valproate. This was associated with K-RAS degradation and a greater than additive increase in autophagosome and autolysosome levels. Killing by the three-drug combination required ATM and AMPKα, and, to a greater extent, Beclin1 and ATG5. In vivo, [valproate + palbociclib] and [neratinib + valproate + palbociclib] interacted to suppress the growth of a carboplatin/paclitaxel resistant PDX ovarian tumors that express a mutant N-RAS. Our data support performing a future three-drug trial with these agents.

Randomized study of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy regimens, with and without sildenafil, with analysis of intermediate cardiac markers

Background

Doxorubicin chemotherapy is used across a range of adult and pediatric malignancies. Cardiac toxicity is common, and dysfunction develops over time in many patients. Biomarkers used for predicting late cardiac dysfunction following doxorubicin exposure have shown promise. Preclinical studies have demonstrated potential cardioprotective effects of sildenafil.

Methods

We sought to confirm the safety of adding sildenafil to doxorubicin-based chemotherapy and assess N-terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) and high sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hsTnI) as early markers of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. We randomized 27 patients (ages 31–77, 92.3% female) receiving doxorubicin chemotherapy using a blocked randomization scheme with randomly permuted block sizes to receive standard chemotherapy alone or with the addition of sildenafil. The study was not blinded. Sildenafil was dosed at 100 mg by mouth daily during therapy; patients took sildenafil three times daily on the day of doxorubicin. Doxorubicin dosing and schedule were dependent on the treatment regimen. Echocardiography was obtained prior to initiation of treatment and routinely thereafter up to 4 years. NT-proBNP and hsTnI were obtained with each cycle before, 1-3 h after, and 24 h after doxorubicin.

Results

Fourteen patients were randomized to receive standard doxorubicin chemotherapy alone (14 treated and analyzed), while 13 patients were randomized to the experimental doxorubicin and sildenafil arm (10 treated and analyzed). No toxicity signal was seen with the addition of sildenafil to doxorubicin-based regimens. There was no statistical difference between the treatment arms in relation to the change of mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between the first and last evaluation. In both arms, hsTnI levels increased over time; however, elevated hsTnI was not associated with declines in LVEF.

Conclusion

Adding sildenafil was safe, but did not offer cardioprotection following doxorubicin treatment. Increases in hsTnI levels were observed over time, but elevations during therapy did not correlate with subsequent decreases in LVEF.

Trial registration

This clinical trial (NCT01375699) was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov on June 17, 2011.

Prior exposure of pancreatic tumors to [sorafenib + vorinostat] enhances the efficacy of an anti-PD-1 antibody

Checkpoint immunotherapy antibodies have not shown efficacy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Pre-clinical studies and subsequently an on-going phase I trial have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of combinatorial radio-chemotherapy plus surgery in this malignancy, including the combination of sorafenib and vorinostat. The lethality of [sorafenib + vorinostat] was enhanced by gemcitabine. Exposure to [sorafenib + vorinostat] reduced the expression of β-catenin, ERBB1, BCL-XL and MCL-1, and the phosphorylation of AKT T308, AKT S473, GSK3 S9/21, mTORC1 and mTORC2. The drug combination increased the expression of Beclin1 and the phosphorylation of eIF2α S51. The drug combination rapidly reduced the levels of multiple HDAC proteins that was directly associated with the previously noted changes in tumor cell biology, as well as with alterations in the expression of biomarkers predictive for a response to checkpoint inhibitor antibodies. In vivo studies using the PAN02 model in its syngeneic mouse demonstrated that an anti-PD-1 antibody had no impact on tumor growth whereas a transient exposure to [sorafenib + vorinostat] significantly suppressed growth. The combination of [sorafenib + vorinostat] with an anti-PD-1 antibody caused a significant further reduction in tumor growth compared to the drug combination alone. Tumors transiently exposed three weeks earlier to [sorafenib + vorinostat] contained elevated levels of CD8+ cells, M1 macrophages and natural killer cells. Drug exposure plus an anti-PD-1 antibody further significantly enhanced the levels of these immune cells in the tumor. Our data argue for performing a new phase I trial in pancreatic cancer combining immunotherapy with [sorafenib + vorinostat]. Abbreviations: ERK: extracellular regulated kinase; PI3K: phosphatidyl inositol 3 kinase; ca: constitutively active; dn: dominant negative; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; AIF: apoptosis inducing factor; AMPK: AMP-dependent protein kinase; mTOR: mammalian target of rapamycin; JAK: Janus Kinase; STAT: Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription; MAPK: mitogen activated protein kinase; PTEN: phosphatase and tensin homologue on chromosome ten; ROS: reactive oxygen species; CMV: empty vector plasmid or virus; si: small interfering; SCR: scrambled; IP: immunoprecipitation; VEH: vehicle; HDAC: histone deacetylase.

Valproate augments Niraparib killing of tumor cells

PARP1 inhibitors are approved therapeutic agents in ovarian carcinomas, and have clinical activity in some breast cancers. As a single agent, niraparib killed ovarian and mammary tumor cells via an ATM-AMPK-ULK1 pathway which resulted in mTOR inactivation and the formation of autophagosomes, temporally followed by autolysosome formation. In parallel, niraparib activated a CD95-FADD-caspase 8 pathway, and collectively these signals caused tumor cell death that was suppressed by knock down of Beclin1, ATG5, CD95, FADD or AIF; or by expression of c-FLIP-s, BCL-XL or dominant negative caspase 9. The HDAC inhibitors AR42 and sodium valproate enhanced niraparib lethality in a greater than additive fashion. HDAC inhibitors enhanced niraparib lethality by increasing activation of the ATM-AMPK-ULK1-autophagy and CD95-FADD-caspase 8 pathways. Knock down of eIF2α, ATM, AMPKα, ULK1, Beclin1 or ATG5 reduced tumor cell killing by the niraparib plus HDAC inhibitor combination. Blockade of either caspase 9 function or that of cathepsin B partially prevented cell death. As a single agent niraparib delayed tumor growth, but did not significantly alter the tumor control rate. Tumors previously exposed to niraparib had activated the ERK1/2 and AKT-mTOR pathways that correlated with increased plasma levels of IL-8, MIF, EGF, uPA and IL-12. Collectively our findings argue that the addition of HDAC inhibitors to niraparib enhances the anti-cancer activity of the PARP1 inhibitor niraparib.

[pemetrexed + sildenafil], via autophagy-dependent HDAC downregulation, enhances the immunotherapy response of NSCLC cells

Pemetrexed is an approved therapeutic in NSCLC and ovarian cancer. Our studies focused on the ability of [pemetrexed + sildenafil] exposure to alter the immunogenicity of lung and ovarian cancer cells. Treatment of lung and ovarian cancer cells with [pemetrexed + sildenafil] in vitro rapidly reduced the expression of PD-L1, PD-L2 and ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), and increased the expression of class I MHCA. In a cell-specific fashion, some cells also released the immunogenic nuclear protein HMGB1 into the extracellular environment. [Pemetrexed + sildenafil] reduced the expression of multiple histone deacetylases that was blocked by knock down of autophagy regulatory proteins. [Pemetrexed + sildenafil] lethality was enhanced by the histone deacetylase inhibitors AR42 and sodium valproate; AR42 and valproate as single agents also rapidly reduced the expression of PD-L1, PD-L2 and ODC, and increased expression of MHCA and CerS6. Nitric oxide and CerS6 signaling was required for drug-induced death receptor activation and tumor cell killing. In vivo, [pemetrexed + sildenafil] lethality against lung cancer cells was enhanced by sodium valproate. Using syngeneic mouse lung cancer cells [pemetrexed + sildenafil] enhanced the anti-tumor effects of antibodies directed to inhibit PD-1 or CTLA4. [Pemetrexed + sildenafil] interacted with the anti-PD-1 antibody to strongly enhance tumor infiltration by M1 macrophages; activated NK cells and activated T cells. Our data demonstrate that treatment of tumor cells with [pemetrexed + sildenafil] results in tumor cell killing and via autophagy-dependent downregulation of HDACs, it opsonizes the remaining tumor cells to anti-tumor immunotherapy antibodies.

The CHK1 inhibitor SRA737 synergizes with PARP1 inhibitors to kill carcinoma cells

Inhibitors of PARP1 are approved therapeutic agents in ovarian carcinomas. We determined whether the novel clinically relevant CHK1 inhibitor SRA737 interacted with PARP1 inhibitors to kill carcinoma cells. In multiple mammary and ovarian cancer lines SRA737 synergized with the PARP1 inhibitors olaparib and niraparib to cause cell death. The [SRA737 + niraparib] drug combination activated an ATM-AMPK-ULK1-mTOR pathway which resulted in the formation of autophagosomes, temporally followed by autolysosome formation. Phosphorylation of ULK1 S317 was essential for kinase activation against ATG13. The drug combination elevated eIF2α phosphorylation which was causal at increasing Beclin1 and ATG5 expression, reducing MCL-1 and BCL-XL levels, and causing CD95 activation. Knock down of CD95, eIF2α, ATM, AMPKα, ULK1, Beclin1 or ATG5 reduced drug combination lethality. Blockade of either caspase 9 function or that of AIF each partially prevented cell death. Expression of activated mTOR or of c-FLIP-s or of BCL-XL reduced cell killing. In vivo, SRA737 and niraparib interacted in an additive fashion to suppress the growth of mammary tumors. Multiplex analyses revealed that drug combination treated tumors had reduced their plasma levels of sERBB1, sERBB2, sVEGFR1, sVEGFR2, sIL-6R, HGF, PDGFAB/BB and CXCL16 and enhanced the levels of CCL26, IL-8 and MIF. Surviving tumors had activated ERK1/2 and AKT. This finding argues that IL-8/ERK/AKT signaling may be an evolutionary survival response to [SRA737 + niraparib].

Abstract 1853: The Chk1 inhibitor, SRA737, synergizes with niraparib to kill cancer cells via multiple cell death pathways

Targeting the DNA damage response (DDR) network is a promising strategy for the development of new cancer therapies. Checkpoint kinase 1, Chk1, is a central mediator of the DDR network and the potent, selective oral Chk1 inhibitor, SRA737, is being investigated in clinical trials. A distinct class of DDR inhibitors targeting PARP (PARPi) are approved for the treatment of ovarian cancers; however, tumors with functional homologous recombination (HR) repair are less sensitive to their effects, thereby limiting the clinical potential of these agents. Several reports have described the synergistic combination of Chk1i and PARPi, although the mechanism of anti-tumor activity has not been well defined. We explored the efficacy and mechanism of cytotoxicity of SRA737 in combination with the PARPi, niraparib, in HR repair proficient tumor cell lines. In short-term cell viability assays, the combination of SRA737 and niraparib elicited greater tumor cell death than either agent alone, as early as 12 hours after exposure to drug. Combination indices determined from colony forming assays indicated synergistic activity (CI < 0.7) using clinically achievable concentrations of each agent. Quantitative immunofluorescence studies revealed activation of ATM and phosphorylation of H2AX within 4 hours of treatment, indicating induction of DNA double strand breaks and activation of DDR signaling. Concurrent changes in the phosphorylation of mTOR, AMPK and the downstream target ULK1 suggested an induction of autophagy. Consistent with this hypothesis, the single agents, as well as the combination, led to decreases in p62 and LAMP2 levels and simultaneous increases in ATG5 and Beclin1 expression, and ATG13 phosphorylation. Autophagic flux was confirmed in cells expressing an LC3-GFP-RFP reporter plasmid. Genetic knockdown of autophagy components resulted in partial rescue of cell viability, suggesting that autophagy-dependent cell death may represent a mechanism of cytotoxicity for this DDR combination. Given that rescue of cell death was incomplete following abrogation of autophagy, we additionally examined the involvement of apoptotic pathways. SRA737 and niraparib treatment resulted in reduced levels of anti-apoptotic proteins, BCL-XL and MCL-1, and increased levels of the pro-apoptotic protein, BIM. Moreover, knock down of pro-apoptotic proteins or over-expression of anti-apoptotic proteins partially rescued combination-induced lethality. Collectively these results argue that toxic autophagy, as well as the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis pathways, contribute to SRA737 and niraparib-induced tumor cell killing. The involvement of multiple mechanisms of cell death may decrease the likelihood of cancer cells to acquire resistance to these agents. These findings support further investigation of SRA737 in combination with PARPi, including niraparib, in HR repair proficient cancers.

Citation Format: Laurence Booth, Jane Roberts, Andrew Poklepovic, Ryan J. Hansen, Bryan Strouse, Snezana Milutinovic, Christian Hassig, Paul Dent. The Chk1 inhibitor, SRA737, synergizes with niraparib to kill cancer cells via multiple cell death pathways [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1853.

PDE5 inhibitors enhance the lethality of pemetrexed through inhibition of multiple chaperone proteins and via the actions of cyclic GMP and nitric oxide

Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors prevent the breakdown of cGMP that results in prolonged protein kinase G activation and the generation of nitric oxide. PDE5 inhibitors enhanced the anti-NSCLC cell effects of the NSCLC therapeutic pemetrexed. [Pemetrexed + sildenafil] activated an eIF2α – ATF4 – CHOP – Beclin1 pathway causing formation of toxic autophagosomes; activated a protective IRE1 – XBP-1 – chaperone induction pathway; and activated a toxic eIF2α – CHOP – DR4 / DR5 / CD95 induction pathway. [Pemetrexed + sildenafil] reduced the expression of c-FLIP-s, MCL-1 and BCL-XL that was blocked in a cell-type -dependent fashion by either over-expression of HSP90 / GRP78 / HSP70 / HSP27 or by blockade of eIF2α-CHOP signaling. Knock down of PKGI/II abolished the ability of sildenafil to enhance pemetrexed toxicity whereas pan-inhibition of NOS using L-NAME or knock down of [iNOS + eNOS] only partially reduced the lethal drug interaction. Pemetrexed reduced the ATPase activities of HSP90 and HSP70 in an ATM-AMPK-dependent fashion that was enhanced by sildenafil signaling via PKGI/II. The drug combination activated an ATM-AMPK-TSC2 pathway that was associated with reduced mTOR S2448 and ULK-1 S757 phosphorylation and increased ULK-1 S317 and ATG13 S318 phosphorylation. These effects were prevented by chaperone over-expression or by expression of an activated form of mTOR that prevented autophagosome formation and reduced cell killing. In two models of NSCLC, sildenafil enhanced the ability of pemetrexed to suppress tumor growth. Collectively we argue that the combination of [pemetrexed + PDE5 inhibitor] should be explored in a new NSCLC phase I trial.

The irreversible ERBB1/2/4 inhibitor neratinib interacts with the PARP1 inhibitor niraparib to kill ovarian cancer cells

The irreversible ERBB1/2/4 inhibitor neratinib has been shown to rapidly down-regulate the expression of ERBB1/2/4 as well as the levels of c-MET, PDGFRα and mutant RAS proteins via autophagic degradation. Neratinib interacted in an additive to synergistic fashion with the approved PARP1 inhibitor niraparib to kill ovarian cancer cells. Neratinib and niraparib caused the ATM-dependent activation of AMPK which in turn was required to cause mTOR inactivation, ULK-1 activation and ATG13 phosphorylation. The drug combination initially increased autophagosome levels followed later by autolysosome levels. Preventing autophagosome formation by expressing activated mTOR or knocking down of Beclin1, or knock down of the autolysosome protein cathepsin B, reduced drug combination lethality. The drug combination caused an endoplasmic reticulum stress response as judged by enhanced eIF2α phosphorylation that was responsible for reducing MCL-1 and BCL-XL levels and increasing ATG5 and Beclin1 expression. Knock down of BIM, but not of BAX or BAK, reduced cell killing. Expression of activated MEK1 prevented the drug combination increasing BIM expression and reduced cell killing. Downstream of the mitochondrion, drug lethality was partially reduced by knock down of AIF, but expression of dominant negative caspase 9 was not protective. Our data demonstrate that neratinib and niraparib interact to kill ovarian cancer cells through convergent DNA damage and endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling. Cell killing required the induction of autophagy and was cathepsin B and AIF -dependent, and effector caspase independent.

The irreversible ERBB1/2/4 inhibitor neratinib interacts with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax to kill mammary cancer cells

The irreversible ERBB1/2/4 inhibitor, neratinib, down-regulates the expression of ERBB1/2/4 as well as the levels of MCL-1 and BCL-XL. Venetoclax (ABT199) is a BCL-2 inhibitor. At physiologic concentrations neratinib interacted in a synergistic fashion with venetoclax to kill HER2 + and TNBC mammary carcinoma cells. This was associated with the drug-combination: reducing the expression and phosphorylation of ERBB1/2/3; in an eIF2α-dependent fashion reducing the expression of MCL-1 and BCL-XL and increasing the expression of Beclin1 and ATG5; and increasing the activity of the ATM-AMPKα-ULK1 S317 pathway which was causal in the formation of toxic autophagosomes. Although knock down of BAX or BAK reduced drug combination lethality, knock down of BAX and BAK did not prevent the drug combination from increasing autophagosome and autolysosome formation. Knock down of ATM, AMPKα, Beclin1 or over-expression of activated mTOR prevented the induction of autophagy and in parallel suppressed tumor cell killing. Knock down of ATM, AMPKα, Beclin1 or cathepsin B prevented the drug-induced activation of BAX and BAK whereas knock down of BID was only partially inhibitory. A 3-day transient exposure of established estrogen-independent HER2 + BT474 mammary tumors to neratinib or venetoclax did not significantly alter tumor growth whereas exposure to [neratinib + venetoclax] caused a significant 7-day suppression of growth by day 19. The drug combination neither altered animal body mass nor behavior. We conclude that venetoclax enhances neratinib lethality by facilitating toxic BH3 domain protein activation via autophagy which enhances the efficacy of neratinib to promote greater levels of cell killing.

Phase I study of pemetrexed with sorafenib in advanced solid tumors

Purpose

To determine if combination treatment with pemetrexed and sorafenib is safe and tolerable in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Results

Thirty-seven patients were enrolled and 36 patients were treated (24 in cohort A; 12 in cohort B). The cohort A dose schedule resulted in problematic cumulative toxicity, while the cohort B dose schedule was found to be more tolerable. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was pemetrexed 750 mg/m² every 14 days with oral sorafenib 400 mg given twice daily on days 1–5. Because dosing delays and modifications were associated with the MTD, the recommended phase II dose was declared to be pemetrexed 500 mg/m² every 14 days with oral sorafenib 400 mg given twice daily on days 1–5. Thirty-three patients were evaluated for antitumor activity. One complete response and 4 partial responses were observed (15% overall response rate). Stable disease was seen in 15 patients (45%). Four patients had a continued response at 6 months, including 2 of 5 patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Experimental Design

A phase I trial employing a standard 3 + 3 design was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cohort A involved a novel dose escalation schema exploring doses of pemetrexed every 14 days with continuous sorafenib. Cohort B involved a modified schedule of sorafenib dosing on days 1–5 of each 14-day pemetrexed cycle. Radiographic assessments were conducted every 8 weeks.

Conclusions

Pemetrexed and intermittent sorafenib therapy is a safe and tolerable combination for patients, with promising activity seen in patients with breast cancer.

Unconventional Approaches to Modulating the Immunogenicity of Tumor Cells

For several years, it has been known that histone deacetylase inhibitors have the potential to alter the immunogenicity of tumor cells exposed to checkpoint inhibitory immunotherapy antibodies. HDAC inhibitors can rapidly reduce expression of PD-L1 and increase expression of MHCA in various tumor types that subsequently facilitate the antitumor actions of checkpoint inhibitors. Recently, we have discovered that drug combinations which cause a rapid and intense autophagosome formation also can modulate the expression of HDAC proteins that control tumor cell immunogenicity via their regulation of PD-L1 and MHCA. These drug combinations, in particular those using the irreversible ERBB1/2/4 inhibitor neratinib, can result in parallel in the internalization of growth factor receptors as well as fellow-traveler proteins such as mutant K-RAS and mutant N-RAS into autophagosomes. The drug-induced autophagosomes contain HDAC proteins/signaling proteins whose expression is subsequently reduced by lysosomal degradation processes. These findings argue that cancer therapies which strongly promote autophagosome formation and autophagic flux may facilitate the subsequent use of additional antitumor modalities using checkpoint inhibitor antibodies.