Acute blood pressure elevation associated with biological therapies for cancer: a focus on VEGF signaling pathway inhibitors

How to deal with renal toxicities from immune-based combination treatments in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. A nephrological consultation for Oncologists

We are witnessing a revolution in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Indeed, several immune-based combinations (ICI [immune checkpoint inhibitor] + ICI, or ICI + antiangiogenic agents) have been approved as first-line therapy for mRCC after demonstrating superior efficacy over the previous standard. Despite all the improvements made, safety remains a critical issue, adverse events (AEs) being the main reason for drug discontinuations or dose reductions, ultimately resulting in an increased risk of losing efficacy. Thus, a good understanding of the AEs associated with the use of immune-based combinations, their prevention, and management, are key in order to maximize therapeutic effectiveness. Among these AEs, renal ones are relatively frequent, but always difficult to be diagnosed, not to take into account that it is often difficult to determine which drug is to blame for such toxicities. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common finding in patients with RCC, either as a pre-existing condition and/or as a consequence of cancer and its treatment; furthermore, CKD, especially in advanced stages and in patients undergoing dialysis, may influence the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics properties of anticancer agents. Finally, managing cancer therapy in kidney transplanted patients is another challenge. In this review, we discuss the therapy management of immune-based combinations in patients with CKD, on dialysis, or transplanted, as well as their renal toxicities, with a focus on their prevention, detection and practical management, taking into account the crucial role of the consulting nephrologist within the multidisciplinary care of these patients.

Microvascular rarefaction caused by the NOTCH signaling pathway is a key cause of TKI-apatinib-induced hypertension and cardiac damage

With the advancement of tumour-targeted therapy technology, the survival of cancer patients has continued to increase, and cardiovascular events have gradually become an important cause of death in cancer patients. This phenomenon occurs due to adverse cardiovascular reactions caused by the cardiovascular toxicity of antitumour therapy. Moreover, the increase in the proportion of elderly patients with cancer and cardiovascular diseases is due to the extension of life expectancy. Hypertension is the most common cardiovascular side effect of small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The increase in blood pressure induced by TKIs and subsequent cardiovascular complications and events affect the survival and quality of life of patients and partly offset the benefits of antitumour therapy. Many studies have confirmed that in the pathogenesis of hypertension, arterioles and capillary thinness are involved in its occurrence and development. Our previous findings showing that apatinib causes microcirculation rarefaction of the superior mesenteric artery and impaired microvascular growth may inspire new therapeutic strategies for treating hypertension. Thus, by restoring microvascular development and branching patterns, total peripheral resistance and blood pressure are reduced. Therefore, exploring the key molecular targets of TKIs that inhibit the expression of angiogenic factors and elucidating the specific molecular mechanism involved are key scientific avenues for effectively promoting endothelial cell angiogenesis and achieving accurate repair of microcirculation injury in hypertension patients.

Cardiovascular Toxicity Induced by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitors

Cardiotoxicity is an important side effect of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors therapy used in the treatment of various malignancies, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Arterial hypertension, cardiac ischemia with the acceleration of atherosclerosis, arrhythmias, myocardial dysfunction and thromboembolic disease are the most feared cardiovascular adverse reactions due to VEGF inhibitors. Susceptibility for the occurrence of VEGF inhibitors-induced cardiotoxicity has multifactorial determinants, with a significant inter-individual variation. Baseline cardiovascular risk assessment of the patient, type and stage of cancer, dose and duration of VEGF inhibitors treatment and adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy are the main predictors for cardiotoxicity. The role of the cardio-oncology team becomes essential for achieving maximum therapeutic anti-angiogenic effects with minimum cardiovascular side effects. This review will summarize the incidence, risk factors, mechanisms, management and treatment of VEGF inhibitors-induced cardiovascular toxicity.

Effects of Camrelizumab Combined with First-Line Chemotherapy on Serum SCC, VEGF Levels, and Adverse Reactions in Patients with Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung

Objective

To study the effects of camrelizumab accompanied by first-line chemotherapy on serum SCC, VEGF levels, and adverse reactions in people undergoing advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

Data sources of the study subjects were 60 people suffering from advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung hospitalized from January 2018 to October 2019. They were assigned to two groups, including the control group and the observation group in a random manner, and each consisted of 30 patients. Those in the observation group received camrelizumab (SHR-1210), and gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy were treated in the control group. Finally, according to the results, we compare the data of patients in both groups so as to find out the similarities and differences.

Results

Among them, the effective efficiency of clinical treatment in the control group reached 36.67%, and that in the observation group reached 56.67%. Intuitively, it can be concluded that the control group showed lower results than the observed group. The observed group turned out to have higher periodic survival and progression free survival (PFS) of patients than the other group. During and after the cycle treatment, the data of SCC and VEGF were reduced to some extent, but the control group appeared to have a more evident reduction rate than the other group.

Conclusion

SHR-1210 combined with chemotherapy has a considerable effect in practical application and has excellent clinical performance.

Cardiovascular Toxicities of Antiangiogenic Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Retrospective, Pharmacovigilance Study

BACKGROUND

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are an essential therapeutic option in the management of various solid tumors, particularly renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, post-marketing data regarding their potential cardiovascular toxicities are scant.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and characterize cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) of VEGFR-TKIs indicated for RCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Disproportionality analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system (July 2014-December 2019) using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the lower bound of the Information component (IC) 95% credibility interval (IC₀₂₅ > 0 is significant).

RESULTS

We identified 51,836 adverse event reports of sunitinib, pazopanib, axitinib, cabozantinib, and lenvatinib in the full database [36% women; median age 65 years (range 57-73)]. CVAEs accounted for 11,784 (23%) of the reports, with hypertension [n = 5548 (11%), ROR = 6.55 (95% CI 6.37-6.74), IC₀₂₅ = 2.48] and hemorrhages [n = 3710 (7.2%), ROR = 1.28 (1.24-1.32), IC₀₂₅ = 0.28] being the most frequent types. Additional CVAEs were over-reported with VEGFR-TKIs treatment, including aortic dissection [n = 61 (0.1%), ROR = 3.50 (2.71-4.51)], pericardial diseases [n = 173 (0.3%), ROR = 1.98 (1.70-2.30)], cardiomyopathy [n = 61 (0.1%), ROR = 1.89 (1.47-2.43)], heart failure [n = 868 (1.7%), ROR = 1.35 (1.26-1.44)], and venous thromboembolism [n = 604 (1.2%), ROR = 1.33 (1.23-1.45), all IC₀₂₅ > 0]. The major pericardial disorder was non-malignant pericardial effusion [n = 134 (77%)]. Aortic dissections were also over-reported in patients without concomitant elevated blood pressure [ROR = 2.68 (1.97-3.63), IC₀₂₅ = 0.91]. Finally, CVAEs were reported more often following lenvatinib and sunitinib treatment compared to other VEGFR-TKIs.

CONCLUSIONS

In post-marketing surveillance data, VEGFR-TKIs are associated with increased reporting of various CVAEs, including pericardial diseases, particularly non-malignant pericardial effusion, and aortic dissections. Moreover, VEGFR-TKIs differ in their CVAE reporting patterns. Clinicians should be conscious of these findings in the care of VEGFR-TKIs recipients.