Novel immunotherapy combinations for genitourinary cancers

Immune mechanisms behind prostate cancer in men of African ancestry: A review

BACKGROUND

Men of African ancestry (AA) with prostate cancer suffer from worse outcomes. However, a recent analysis of patients treated with the dendritic cell vaccine sipuleucel-T for prostate cancer suggested that AA patients could have improved outcomes relative to whites.

METHODS

We conducted a focused literature review of Medline-indexed articles and clinical trials listed on clinicaltrials.gov.

RESULTS

We identify several studies pointing to enrichment of inflammatory cellular infiltrates and cytokine signaling among AA patients with prostate cancer. We outline potential genomic and transcriptomic alterations that may contribute to immunogenicity. Last, we investigate differences in host immunity and vaccine responsiveness that may be enhanced in AA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

AA patients with prostate cancer may be enriched for an immunogenic phenotype. Dedicated studies are needed to better understand the immune mechanisms that contribute to existing cancer disparities and test immune-based therapies in this population.

Antibody-drug conjugates: beyond current approvals and potential future strategies

The recent approvals for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in multiple malignancies in recent years have fuelled the ongoing development of this class of drugs. These novel agents combine the benefits of high specific targeting of oncogenic cell surface antigens with the additional cell kill from high potency cytotoxic payloads, thus achieving wider therapeutic windows. This review will summarise the clinical activity of ADCs in tumour types not covered elsewhere in this issue, such as gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) cancers and glioblastoma (GBM). In addition to the ongoing clinical testing of existing ADCs, there is substantial preclinical and early phase testing of newer ADCs or ADC incorporating strategies. This review will provide selected insights into such future development, focusing on the development of novel ADCs against new antigen targets in the tumour microenvironment (TME) and combination of ADCs with immuno-oncology (IO) agents.

Impact of clinicopathological features on immune-based combinations for advanced urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Aims: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently revolutionized the treatment landscape of metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The authors performed a meta-analysis aiming to evaluate the predictive value of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, age, sex, liver metastasis and histology in trials comparing first-line ICI-based combinations with chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients. Methods: Hazard ratios were analyzed. Results: ICI-based combinations significantly decreased the risk of death in several clinicopathological subgroups, including patients with no liver metastases (hazard ratio: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.74-0.95) and those with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (hazard ratio: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.97). Conclusion: The benefit of ICI-based combinations over chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma was consistent across several clinicopathological subgroups, although a proportion of patients responded to chemotherapy alone.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors rechallenge in urological tumors: An extensive review of the literature

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have led to a significant change in the treatment of urological tumors where several agents are currently approved. Yet, most patients discontinue treatment due to disease progression or after the onset of severe immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Following promising results in melanoma patients, retreatment with an ICI is receiving increasing attention as an attractive option for selected patients. We performed a literature review focusing on the feasibility, safety, timing and activity of ICI rechallenge in genitourinary cancers where very little information is available. We classified the different ICI retreatment strategies into three main clinical scenarios: retreatment after terminating a prior course of ICI while still on response; retreatment after interruption due to IRAEs; retreatment after progression while on ICI therapy. The pros and cons of these options in the field of urological tumors are then discussed, and critical suggestions proffered for the design of future clinical trials.

Prostate Carcinogenesis: Insights in Relation to Epigenetics and Inflammation

Prostate cancer is a multifactorial disease that mainly occurs due to the accumulation of somatic, genetic, and epigenetic changes, resulting in the inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes and activation of oncogenes. Mutations in genes, specifically those that control cell growth and division or the repair of damaged DNA, make the cells grow and divide uncontrollably to form a tumor. The risk of developing prostate cancer depends upon the gene that has undergone the mutation. Identifying such genetic risk factors for prostate cancer poses a challenge for the researchers. Besides genetic mutations, many epigenetic alterations, including DNA methylation, histone modifications (methylation, acetylation, ubiquitylation, sumoylation, and phosphorylation) nucleosomal remodeling, and chromosomal looping, have significantly contributed to the onset of prostate cancer as well as the prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment of prostate cancer. Chronic inflammation also plays a major role in the onset and progression of human cancer, via modifications in the tumor microenvironment by initiating epithelialmesenchymal transition and remodeling the extracellular matrix. In this article, the authors present a brief history of the mechanisms and potential links between the genetic aberrations, epigenetic changes, inflammation, and inflammasomes that are known to contribute to the prognosis of prostate cancer. Furthermore, the authors examine and discuss the clinical potential of prostate carcinogenesis in relation to epigenetics and inflammation for its diagnosis and treatment..

Expression of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 as a Predictive Biomarker in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Patients Treated with First-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Versus Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have reported durable responses in selected groups of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, identification of biomarkers predictive of response to ICIs remains an unmet need in mUC management, and the role of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed at assessing the predictive value of PD-L1 in mUC patients receiving first-line ICIs as monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agents across randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We retrieved all the relevant RCTs through PubMed/Medline, Cochrane library, and EMBASE; proceedings of the main international oncological meetings were also searched for relevant abstracts. Eligible studies included RCTs evaluating ICIs versus chemotherapy in PD-L1-positive mUCs; the primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Three phase III trials matched our eligibility criteria; a total of 2237 PD-L1-positive mUC patients (ICIs: 1125; chemotherapy: 1112) were included in the analysis. Compared with chemotherapy, ICIs were associated with higher OS in PD-L1-positive patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.96; p = 0.007); conversely, no differences were observed in the PD-L1-negative patient population (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.89-1.19; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with standard chemotherapy, our results suggested a survival benefit in PD-L1-positive mUC patients receiving ICIs; conversely, no benefit was observed in patients with PD-L1-negative disease. Although this systematic review and meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution due to several issues, our results highlight the need for reliable predictive biomarkers of response to ICIs, providing a benchmark for future studies in this setting.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Despite immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) having revolutionized the treatment landscape of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), an important percentage of patients do not experience clinical benefit or durable responses. Identification of reliable biomarkers of response to ICIs remains a mandatory need in mUC management, and further efforts are needed to standardize the assessment of programmed cell death ligand 1 in urothelial carcinoma.

Current Strategies and Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a frequent cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Metastatic UC has been historically associated with poor prognosis, with a median overall survival of approximately 15 months and a 5-year survival rate of 18%. Although platinum-based chemotherapy remains the mainstay of medical treatment for patients with metastatic UC, chemotherapy clinical trials produced modest benefit with short-lived, disappointing responses. In recent years, the better understanding of the role of immune system in cancer control has led to the development and approval of several immunotherapeutic approaches in UC therapy, where immune checkpoint inhibitors have been revolutionizing the treatment of metastatic UC. Because of a better tumor molecular profiling, FGFR inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, anti-HER2 agents, and antibody drug conjugates targeting Nectin-4 are also emerging as new therapeutic options. Moreover, a wide number of trials is ongoing with the aim to evaluate several other alterations and pathways as new potential targets in metastatic UC. In this review, we will discuss the recent advances and highlight future directions of the medical treatment of UC, with a particular focus on recently published data and ongoing active and recruiting trials.