Impact of tumor size on the outcome of patients with small renal cell carcinoma

A Bayesian competing risk analysis of renal cancer patients based on SEER database

BACKGROUND

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains a global health concern due to its poor survival rate. This study aimed to investigate the influence of medical determinants and socioeconomic status on survival outcomes of RCC patients. We analyzed the survival data of 41,563 RCC patients recorded under the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from 2012 to 2020.

METHODS

We employed a competing risk model, assuming lifetime of RCC patients under various risks follows Chen distribution. This model accounts for uncertainty related to survival time as well as causes of death, including missing cause of death. For model analysis, we utilized Bayesian inference and obtained the estimate of various key parameters such as cumulative incidence function (CIF) and cause-specific hazard. Additionally, we performed Bayesian hypothesis testing to assess the impact of multiple factors on the survival time of RCC patients.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed that the survival time of RCC patients is significantly influenced by gender, income, marital status, chemotherapy, tumor size, and laterality. However, we observed no significant effect of race and origin on patient's survival time. The CIF plots indicated a number of important distinctions in incidence of causes of death corresponding to factors income, marital status, race, chemotherapy, and tumor size.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights the impact of various medical and socioeconomic factors on survival time of RCC patients. Moreover, it also demonstrates the utility of competing risk model for survival analysis of RCC patients under Bayesian paradigm. This model provides a robust and flexible framework to deal with missing data, which can be particularly useful in real-life situations where patients information might be incomplete.

The prognostic impact of tumor length on pathological stage IA-IC esophageal adenocarcinoma

This study was completed to evaluate the relationship between tumor length and the prognosis of patients with pathological stage IA-IC esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database (United States, 2006-2015). X-tile software and ROC analysis were mainly used to explore the best threshold of tumor length for dividing patients into different groups, and then propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance other variables between groups. The primary outcome assessed was overall survival (OS). A total of 762 patients were identified, and 500 patients were left after PSM. Twenty millimeters were used as the threshold of tumor length. Patients with longer tumor lengths showed worse OS (median: 93 vs. 128 months; P = 0.006). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that longer tumor length was an independent risk factor (hazard ratio 1.512, 95% confidence interval, 1.158-1.974, P = 0.002). Tumor length has an impact on patients with pathological stage IA-IC EAC who undergo surgery alone. The prognostic value of the pathological stage group may be improved after combining it with tumor length and age.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of benign and malignant renal tumors: Distinguishing CEUS features differ with tumor size

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is now a guideline-recommended strategy for diagnosing renal lesions. Tumor size is related to the risk of the treatment and prognosis in renal tumors. Thus, we aim to analyze the CEUS features of solid renal tumors in relation to tumor size.

METHODS

The CEUS appearance of 156 pathologically diagnosed solid renal tumors were retrospectively analyzed. Three groups were stratified according to the tumor size (≤2 cm [group I], 2.1-4 cm [group II] and 4.1-7 cm [group III]). For each group, the features of wash-in type, enhancement degree, enhancement homogeneity, and the presence of a pseudocapsule sign were compared between benign and malignant tumors.

RESULTS

All 156 included lesions were detected by CEUS. The proportion of benign tumors in three size groups was 37.1%, 19.4%, and 20.4%, respectively. The proportion of malignant tumors was highest (80.6%) in group II, followed by group III (79.6%) and group I (62.9%). In group I, malignant and benign tumors differed significantly in the presence of a pseudocapsule sign (p = 0.015) and homogeneity (p = 0.007). In group II, the degree of enhancement differed (p = 0.02) between tumor types. In group III, the two tumor types differed in both the wash-in pattern (p = 0.015) and enhancement degree (p = 0.024). The weighted and Cohen's kappa values for the concordance between inter-observer agreement ranged from 0.31 (95% CI: 0.36-0.57) to 0.90 (95% CI: 0.77-1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS features of malignant and benign renal tumors change along with the tumor size. The use of CEUS features in the diagnosis of benign and malignant tumors requires consideration of tumor size.

Impact of Renal Cell Carcinoma Histological Variants on Recurrence After Partial Nephrectomy: A Multi-Institutional, Prospective Study (UROCCR Study 82)

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) morphotype remains unclear in patients who undergo partial nephrectomy (PN). Our objective was to determine the risk factors for recurrence after PN, including RCC morphotype.

METHODS

Patients with RCC who had undergone PN were extracted from the prospective, national French database, UroCCR. Patients with genetic predisposition, bilateral or multiple tumours, and those who had undergone secondary totalization were excluded. Primary endpoint was 5-year, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Risk factors for recurrence were assessed by multivariable Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 2,767 patients were included (70% male; median age: 61 years [interquartile range (IQR) 51-69]). Most (71.5%) of the PN procedures were robot-assisted. Overall, 2,573 (93.0%) patients were recurrence free, and 74 died (2.7%). Five-year RFS was 84.9% (IQR 82.4-87.4). A significant difference in RFS was observed between RCC morphotypes (p < 0.001). Surgical margins (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-3.2], p < 0.01), pT stage >1 (HR = 2.6 [95% CI: 1.8-3.7], p < 0.01]) and Fuhrmann grade >2 (HR = 1.9 [95% CI: 1.4-2.6], p < 0.001) were risk factors for recurrence, whereas chromophobe subtype was a protective factor (HR = 0.08 [95% CI: 0.01-0.6], p = 0.02). Five-year OS was 94.0% [92.4-95.7], and there were no significant differences between RCC subgroups (p = 0.06). The main study limitation was its design (multicentre national database), which may be responsible for declarative bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Chromophobe morphotype was significantly associated with better RFS in RCC patients who underwent PN. Conversely, pT stage, Fuhrman group and positive surgical margins were risk factors for recurrence.

Evaluating the value of tumor length times width in colorectal adenocarcinoma with different tumor locations

The T classification, which reflects the vertical growth pattern of the tumor, is one of the most important prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of tumor length and width in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). A total of 259 patients with stage I-III CRC who underwent curative resection were reevaluated according to tumor location. One-way ANOVA analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between the tumor length times width (TLTW) and clinical parameters. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to analyze the potential prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS) of patients with stage I-III CRC. In the entire cohort, the TLTW was analyzed as a continuous variable. The results suggested that TLTW (P = .003) and tumor location (P = .04) could be independent prognostic factors for patients with CRC. In addition, TLTW had an intimate relationship with tumor location (P < 0.001) and differentiation (P = .003). The mean TLTW of the right colon was significantly larger than mean TLTW of the left colon and rectal cancers. However, the mean TLTW of the left colon cancer was similar to that of the rectal cancer TLTW (P > 0.05, not shown). Subgroup analysis of TLTW according to tumor location suggested that TLTW was an independent prognostic factor for patients with right colon cancer (RCC) (P = .007) rather than left colon cancer (LCC) (P = .49) or rectal cancer (P = .16). Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis based on tumor location suggested that the survival rate of RCC patients had a distinctly higher trend rate than LCC patients and RECC patients in the long-term rather than in the short-term. TLTW is closely associated with tumor location in CRC. In addition, TLTW may be an independent prognostic factor for patients with RCC.

Image-guided core biopsy of 2-cm or smaller renal tumors

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate diagnostic yield, risk factors for diagnostic failure, and safety of image-guided core biopsy of renal tumors≤2cm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-four biopsies of 84 renal tumors (mean size, 1.5±0.4[SD] cm; range, 0.6-2.0cm) from 84 patients (53 men, 31 women; mean age, 61.7±12.7 [SD] years; age range, 34-87 years) were included. All adverse events (AEs) were evaluated based on the CIRSE classification. The 84 procedures were classified as diagnostic or nondiagnostic. Multiple variables related to the patients, tumors, and procedures were assessed to identify variables associated with diagnostic failure.

RESULTS

All 84 biopsies (100%) were technically successful, defined as penetration of the target and acquisition of some specimens. Eighty (80/84; 95.2%) biopsy procedures were diagnostic and four (4/84; 4.8%) procedures were nondiagnostic. Among 80 diagnosed renal tumors, 71/80 (88.8%) tumors were malignant (49 clear cell renal cell carcinomas [RCCs], 14 papillary RCCs, 3 chromophobe RCCs, 3 metastatic renal cancers, 1 lymphoma, and 1 unclassified RCC) and 9/80 (11.2%) lesions were benign (5 angiomyolipomas, 3 oncocytomas, and 1 inflammatory lesion). No significant differences existed in any variables between the two groups. A total of 57 (57/84; 67.9%) procedures resulted in 56 Grade 1, 2 Grade 2, and 1 Grade 3 AEs.

CONCLUSION

Image-guided biopsy of renal tumors≤2cm is safe and has a high diagnostic yield.

Clinicopathological Features, Treatment, and Prognosis in Primary Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma of the Breast: A Retrospective Study of 46 Patients

BACKGROUND Primary lymphoma of the breast is rare, and primary diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the breast is very rare. This study aimed to identify the clinicopathological characteristics and treatment associated with prognosis in patients with primary DLBCL of the breast. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective study included the clinical and treatment data from 46 women with a histological diagnosis of primary DLBCL. Patients were staged using Ann Arbor staging criteria, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the international prognostic index (IPI) scores were obtained. Laboratory finding included serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and the immunohistochemistry findings were recorded. RESULTS Patients (n=46), included stage I (n=18), stage II (n=18), stage III (n=3), and stage IV DLBCL (n=9). Treatment included chemotherapy with rituximab (n=16), and radiotherapy (n=12). The median follow-up time was 40.5 months, the 5-year OS rate was 36.2%, and the 5-year PFS rate was 29.1%. Univariate analysis showed that clinical stage, serum LDH, the IPI score, chemotherapy cycles >3, and Bcl-2 and Bcl-6 expression were correlated with the 5-year OS and PFS. Multivariate risk regression analysis showed that the number of chemotherapy cycles (>3) and Bcl-6 expression were independent prognostic factors in primary DLBCL of the breast (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS A retrospective study of 46 patients with primary DLBCL of the breast showed that >3 cycles of chemotherapy and expression of Bcl-6 resulted in improved OS and PFS. Radiotherapy controlled local tumor recurrence but did not improve the OS and PFS. Rituximab did not improve patient survival.

Roles for active surveillance in renal cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With this review, we describe the most recent advances in active surveillance as well as diagnosis and management of small renal masses (SRMs).

RECENT FINDINGS

We discuss diagnosis, differentiation of solid from cystic lesions, risk prediction and treatment of the SRM. A better understanding of the disease facilitates the use of more conservatory treatments, such as active surveillance. Active surveillance has been increasingly accepted not only for SRM, but also for larger tumors and even metastatic patients. Exiting advances in risk prediction will help us define which patients can be safely managed with active surveillance and which require immediate treatment. Meanwhile, the use of renal tumor biopsies is still an important tool for these cases.

SUMMARY

Active surveillance is an option for many patients with renal masses. Noninvasive methods for diagnosis and risk prediction are being developed, but meanwhile, renal tumor biopsy is a useful tool. A better understanding of the disease increases the number of patients who can undergo active surveillance fully certain of the safety of their management.

Comparison among cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, and partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinomas sized smaller than 2 cm or sized 2-4 cm: A population-based study

This study aimed to compare radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CRA), and partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) sized ≤2 cm or 2 to 4 cm.The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify 17,234 patients diagnosed with T1aN0M0 RCC from 2004 to 2015. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared among patients who were treated using PN, CRA, or RFA. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine prognostic factors for survival.In patients with RCCs sized 2 to 4 cm, better OS and CSS were observed with PN than with CRA or RFA. On multivariable analysis, compared to PN, CRA and RFA were independently associated with poor OS and CSS in patients with RCCs sized 2 to 4 cm. In patients with RCCs sized ≤2 cm, better OS was observed with PN than with CRA or RFA; however, CSS was similar. On multivariable analysis, compared to PN, RFA was independently associated with poor OS in patients with RCCs sized ≤2 cm.CRA or RFA should not be recommended for patients with RCCs sized 2 to 4 cm; PN is an effective treatment modality in these patients. For patients with RCCs sized ≤2 cm, CRA can be an equally effective alternative to PN.

Prognostic Value of the Tumor Size in Resectable Colorectal Cancer with Different Primary Locations: A Retrospective Study with the Propensity Score Matching

Objective: To investigate the prognostic value of the tumor size in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with different primary tumor locations. Patients and methods: We retrospectively recruited 3971 stage I-III CRC patients with curative resection. The propensity score matching technique was conducted to reduce the selection bias, producing a propensity score matched cohort of 1347 pairs of patients based on the tumor size (≤4 cm and >4 cm groups). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare the overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups. Subgroup analyses which were stratified by primary tumor locations and several other baseline variables were also performed for conformation. Results: In the propensity score matched cohort, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that patients with a tumor size less than 4 cm had similar OS, CSS and DFS, compared to patients with a tumor size greater than 4 cm. While in multivariate analyses, the smaller tumor size was an independent risk factor for CSS (HR, 1.275; 95% CI, 1.006-1.616; P=0.045). Subgroup analyses based on primary tumor locations further suggested that the smaller tumor size was significantly associated with worse OS (HR, 2.455; 95% CI, 1.297-4.649; P=0.006) and CSS (HR, 2.493; 95% CI, 1.202-5.174; P=0.014) in patients with right-side colon cancers (RCC). Conclusions: Our propensity matching score study indicated that the smaller tumor size was an independent risk factor for CSS in patients with stage I-III CRC, and for OS and CSS in patients with RCC.