Evolving therapies in advanced oesophago-gastric cancers and the increasing role of immunotherapy

Molecular Classifications in Gastric Cancer: A Call for Interdisciplinary Collaboration

Gastric cancer (GC) is a heterogeneous disease, often diagnosed at advanced stages, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 20%. Despite notable technological advancements in cancer research over the past decades, their impact on GC management and outcomes has been limited. Numerous molecular alterations have been identified in GC, leading to various molecular classifications, such as those developed by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG). Other authors have proposed alternative perspectives, including immune, proteomic, or epigenetic-based classifications. However, molecular stratification has not yet transitioned into clinical practice for GC, and little attention has been paid to alternative molecular classifications. In this review, we explore diverse molecular classifications in GC from a practical point of view, emphasizing their relationships with clinicopathological factors, prognosis, and therapeutic approaches. We have focused on classifications beyond those of TCGA and the ACRG, which have been less extensively reviewed previously. Additionally, we discuss the challenges that must be overcome to ensure their impact on patient treatment and prognosis. This review aims to serve as a practical framework to understand the molecular landscape of GC, facilitate the development of consensus molecular categories, and guide the design of innovative molecular studies in the field.

Polyphyllin I suppresses the gastric cancer growth by promoting cancer cell ferroptosis

Background: Ferroptosis is a new form of regulated cell death characterized by the accumulation of iron-dependent lipid peroxides and membrane damages. Recent studies have identified an important role for cancer cell ferroptosis in antitumor therapy. On the other hand, polyphyllin I (PPI) has been reported to exert antitumor effects on some types of cancers. However, it remains unknown whether or not PPI regulates cancer cell ferroptosis.

Methods: Two types of human gastric cancer cells (AGS and MKN-45) were used to establish tumor xenograft models in nude mice that were treated with polyphyllin I (PPI) to observe tumor growth, while cells also were cultured for in vitro studies. Ferroptosis, based on the intracellular ROS/lipid ROS production and accumulation of ferrous ions, was detected using a fluorescence microscope and flow cytometer, while the expression of NRF2/FTH1 was measured using Western blotting assays.

Results: Here we found that PPI inhibited the gastric cancer growth in vivo and in vitro while increasing the intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS)/lipid peroxides and ferrous ions in the gastric cancer cells. PPI also decreased the levels of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) and ferritin heavy chain 1 (FTH1) in gastric cancer cells in vitro. Moreover, liproxstain-1, an inhibitor of cell ferroptosis, mostly reversed the cell ferroptosis and tumor growth arrest induced by PPI. Finally, the effects of PPI on cancer cell ferroptosis were diminished by the overexpression of NRF2.

Conclusion: For the first time, our results have demonstrated that PPI exerts its antitumor activity on the gastric cancer by, at least partially, inducing cancer cell ferroptosis via regulating NRF2/FTH1 pathway. These findings may be implicated for clinical replacement therapy of the gastric cancer.

Current molecular biomarkers evaluation in gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: pathologist does matter

The comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas has led to the improvement of targeted and more effective treatments. As a result, several biomarkers have been introduced into clinical practice and the implementation of innovative diagnostic tools is under study. Such assessments are mainly based on the evaluation of limited biopsy material in clinical practice. In this setting, the pathologist represents a key player in the selection of patients facilitating precision medicine approaches.

Neoantigens and their clinical applications in human gastrointestinal cancers

Background

Tumor-specific neoantigens are ideal targets for cancer immunotherapy. As research findings have proved, neoantigen-specific T cell activity is immunotherapy’s most important determinant.

Main text

There is sufficient evidence showing the role of neoantigens in clinically successful immunotherapy, providing a justification for targeting. Because of the significance of the pre-existing anti-tumor immune response for the immune checkpoint inhibitor, it is believed that personalized neoantigen-based therapy may be an imperative approach for cancer therapy. Thus, intensive attention is given to strategies targeting neoantigens for the significant impact with other immunotherapies, such as the immune checkpoint inhibitor. Today, several algorithms are designed and optimized based on Next-Generation Sequencing and public databases, including dbPepNeo, TANTIGEN 2.0, Cancer Antigenic Peptide Database, NEPdb, and CEDAR databases for predicting neoantigens in silico that stimulates the development of T cell therapies, cancer vaccine, and other ongoing immunotherapy approaches.

Conclusions

In this review, we deliberated the current developments in understanding and recognition of the immunogenicity of newly found gastrointestinal neoantigens as well as their functions in immunotherapies and cancer detection. We also described how neoantigens are being developed and how they might be used in the treatment of GI malignancies.

Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done

In recent years, advances of anticancer and supportive therapies have determined a gradual improvement in survival rates and patients’ general conditions in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC), allowing them to receive further treatments. The choice of treatment is driven by performance status, age, stage of disease, number of metastatic sites and time from the first to third line of treatment. Targets such as microsatellite instability, PD-L1 expression, and HER2 overexpression or amplification may be addressed to personalise treatment and prolong survival. Despite a growing number of third line options that have provided clinicians with greater opportunities to customise treatments, up to date few agents have been demonstrated as effective after two standard lines for mGC; for these reasons, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy were all widely investigated in both phase II and phase III studies. Overall, TAS-102, apatinib, regorafenib, nilotinib, trastuzumab, and pembrolizumab were demonstrated to be valid options in the third line scenario for mGC patient refractory to at least two lines of therapy. A multimodal approach based on chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted agents, a personalised nutritional programme as well as the research of new predictive biomarkers may pave the way to new strategies to identify the best treatment for each patient.