Using molecular diagnostic testing to personalize the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors

FBXW7 regulates the sensitivity of imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors by targeting MCL1

BACKGROUND

Imatinib contributes to improving prognosis of high-risk or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). As therapeutic efficacy is limited by imatinib resistance and toxicity, the exploration of predictive markers of imatinib therapeutic efficacy that enables patients to utilize more effective therapeutic strategies remains urgent.

METHODS

The correlation between FBXW7 and imatinib resistance via FBXW7-MCL1 axis was evaluated in vitro and in vivo experiments. The significance of FBXW7 as a predictor of imatinib treatment efficacy was examined in 140 high-risk patients with GISTs.

RESULTS

The ability of FBXW7 to predict therapeutic efficacy of adjuvant imatinib in high-risk GIST patients was determined through 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates analysis and multivariate analysis. FBXW7 affects imatinib sensitivity by regulating apoptosis in GIST-T1 cells. FBXW7 targets MCL1 to regulate apoptosis. MCL1 involves in the regulation of imatinib sensitivity through inhibiting apoptosis in GIST-T1 cells. FBXW7 regulates imatinib sensitivity by down-regulating MCL1 to enhance imatinib-induced apoptosis in vitro. FBXW7 regulates imatinib sensitivity of GIST cells by targeting MCL1 to predict efficacy of imatinib treatment in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

FBXW7 regulates imatinib sensitivity by inhibiting MCL1 to enhance imatinib-induced apoptosis in GIST, and predicts efficacy of imatinib treatment in high-risk GIST patients treated with imatinib.

Rare malignant neoplasm of the esophagus: current status and future perspectives

Esophageal cancer is common worldwide, including in Japan, and its major histological subtype is squamous cell carcinoma. However, there are some rare esophageal cancers, including neuroendocrine neoplasm, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, carcinosarcoma and malignant melanoma. The biological and clinical features of these cancers differ from those of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, different treatment strategies are needed for these cancers but are based on limited evidence. Neuroendocrine neoplasm is mainly divided into neuroendocrine tumor and neuroendocrine carcinoma by differentiation and the Ki-67 proliferation index or mitotic index. Epidemiologically, the majority of esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms are neuroendocrine carcinoma. The treatment of neuroendocrine carcinoma is similar to that of small cell lung cancer, which has similar morphological and biological features. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor is known to be associated with alterations in the c-KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor genes and, if resectable, is treated in accordance with the modified Fletcher classification. Carcinosarcoma is generally resistant to both chemotherapy and radiotherapy and requires multimodal treatments such as surgery plus chemotherapy to achieve cure. Primary malignant melanoma is resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy, but immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently demonstrated efficacy for malignant melanoma of the esophagus. This review focuses on the current status and future perspectives for rare cancer of the esophagus.

Genomic profiling in GIST: Implications in clinical outcome and future challenges

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) are the most frequent mesenchymal neoplasia of the digestive tract. Genomic alterations in KIT, PDFGRA, SDH, and BRAF genes are essential in GIST oncogenesis. Therefore, the mutations in these genes have demonstrated clinical implications. Tumors with deletions in KIT-exon 11 or duplications in exon 9 are associated with a worse prognosis. In contrast, KIT-exon 11 substitutions and duplications are associated with a better clinical outcome. Moreover, mutations in Kit exon 9 and 11 are actionable, due to their response to imatinib, while mutations in PDGFRA respond to sunitinib and/or avapritinib. Although, molecular testing on tissue samples is effective; it is invasive, requires adequate amounts of tissue, and a long experimental process is needed for results. In contrast, liquid biopsy has been proposed as a simple and non-invasive method to test biomarkers in cancer. The most common molecule analyzed by liquid biopsy is circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). GISTs ctDNA testing has been demonstrated to be effective in identifying known and novel KIT mutations that were not detected using traditional tissue DNA testing and have been useful in determining progression risk and response to TKI therapy. This allows the clinician to have an accurate picture of the genetic changes of the tumor over time. In this work, we aimed to discuss the implications of mutational testing in clinical outcomes, the methods to test ctDNA and the future challenges in the establishment of alternatives of personalized medicine.

Precision Oncology in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumors) represent 20% of sarcomatous tumors and 1-2% of primary gastrointestinal cancers. They have an excellent prognosis when localized and resectable, though their prognosis is poor in the metastatic setting, with limited options after the second line until recently. Four lines are now standard in KIT-mutated GIST and one in PDGFRA-mutated GIST. An exponential growth of new treatments is expected in this era of molecular diagnostic techniques and systematic sequencing. Currently, the main challenge remains the emergence of resistance linked to secondary mutations caused by selective pressure induced by TKIs. Repeating biopsies to tailor treatments might be a step in the right direction, and liquid biopsies at progression may offer a non-invasive alternative. New molecules with wider KIT inhibition are under investigation and could change the catalog and the sequence of existing treatments. Combination therapies may also be an approach to overcome current resistance mechanisms. Here, we review the current epidemiology and biology of GIST and discuss future management options, with an emphasis on genome-oriented therapies.

Predictive Value of a Radiomics Nomogram Model Based on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography for KIT Exon 9 Gene Mutation in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

OBJECTIVES

To establish and validate a radiomics nomogram model for preoperative prediction of KIT exon 9 mutation status in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-seven patients with pathologically confirmed GISTs were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Imaging and clinicopathological data were collected and randomly assigned to the training set (n = 60) and test set (n = 27) at a ratio of 7:3. Based on contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) arterial and venous phase images, the region of interest (ROI) of the tumors were manually drawn layer by layer, and the radiomics features were extracted. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to test the consistency between observers. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO) were used to further screen the features. The nomogram of integrated radiomics score (Rad-Score) and clinical risk factors (extra-gastric location and distant metastasis) was drawn on the basis of multivariate logistic regression. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the predictive efficiency of the nomogram, and the clinical benefits that the decision curve evaluation model may bring to patients.

RESULTS

The selected radiomics features (arterial phase and venous phase features) were significantly correlated with the KIT exon 9 mutation status of GISTs. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the radiomics model were 0.863, 85.7%, 80.4%, and 85.0% for the training group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.750-0.938), and 0.883, 88.9%, 83.3%, and 81.5% for the test group (95% CI: 0.701-0.974), respectively. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the nomogram model were 0.902 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.798-0.964), 85.7%, 86.9%, and 91.7% for the training group, and 0.907 (95% CI: 0.732-0.984), 77.8%, 94.4%, and 88.9% for the test group, respectively. The decision curve showed the clinical application value of the radiomic nomogram.

CONCLUSION

The radiomics nomogram model based on CE-CT can effectively predict the KIT exon 9 mutation status of GISTs and may be used for selective gene analysis in the future, which is of great significance for the accurate treatment of GISTs.

Ripretinib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an overview of current evidence and drug approval

Over the past 20 years, the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors has acted as an important model in the advancement of molecularly targeted therapies for solid tumors. The success of imatinib has established it as a lasting therapy in the management of early-stage and advanced disease in the first-line setting. Imatinib resistance inevitably develops, resulting in the need for further lines of therapy. Ripretinib is an orally administered switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor, specifically developed to target both primary and secondary KIT and PDGFRα resistance mutations. Herein, the authors discuss the molecular rationale, the preclinical evidence and the clinical use of ripretinib in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the advanced stages of disease.

Clinical genomic profiling in the management of patients with soft tissue and bone sarcoma

There are more than 70 distinct sarcomas, and this diversity complicates the development of precision-based therapeutics for these cancers. Prospective comprehensive genomic profiling could overcome this challenge by providing insight into sarcomas' molecular drivers. Through targeted panel sequencing of 7494 sarcomas representing 44 histologies, we identify highly recurrent and type-specific alterations that aid in diagnosis and treatment decisions. Sequencing could lead to refinement or reassignment of 10.5% of diagnoses. Nearly one-third of patients (31.7%) harbor potentially actionable alterations, including a significant proportion (2.6%) with kinase gene rearrangements; 3.9% have a tumor mutational burden ≥10 mut/Mb. We describe low frequencies of microsatellite instability (<0.3%) and a high degree of genome-wide loss of heterozygosity (15%) across sarcomas, which are not readily explained by homologous recombination deficiency (observed in 2.5% of cases). In a clinically annotated subset of 118 patients, we validate actionable genetic events as therapeutic targets. Collectively, our findings reveal the genetic landscape of human sarcomas, which may inform future development of therapeutics and improve clinical outcomes for patients with these rare cancers.

New treatment strategies for advanced-stage gastrointestinal stromal tumours

When gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST), the most common form of sarcoma, was first recognized as a distinct pathological entity in the 1990s, patients with advanced-stage disease had a very poor prognosis owing to a lack of effective medical therapies. The discovery of KIT mutations as the first and most prevalent drivers of GIST and the subsequent development of the first KIT tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), imatinib, revolutionized the treatment of patients with this disease. We can now identify the driver mutation in 99% of patients with GIST via molecular diagnostic testing, and therapies have been developed to treat many, but not all, molecular subtypes of the disease. At present, seven drugs are approved by the FDA for the treatment of advanced-stage GIST (imatinib, sunitinib, regorafenib, ripretinib, avapritinib, larotrectinib and entrectinib), all of which are TKIs. Although these agents can be very effective for treating certain GIST subtypes, challenges remain and new therapeutic approaches are needed. In this Review, we discuss the molecular subtypes of GIST and the evolution of current treatments, as well as their therapeutic limitations. We also highlight emerging therapeutic approaches that might overcome clinical challenges through novel strategies predicated on the biological features of the distinct GIST molecular subtypes.

The Management of Unresectable, Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common gastrointestinal tract mesenchymal tumours. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have transformed the management of advanced GIST. Imatinib was the first TKI to gain approval as management for patients with advanced GIST, establishing a new standard of care. Since then, as a result of several trials including the GRID and INVICTUS studies, we now have five lines of approved targeted therapy, including imatinib, sunitinib, regorafenib, ripretinib and avapritinib for the treatment of unresectable, advanced GISTs. In this review, the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group (AGITG) provide an overview of the key trials that have changed clinical practice, discuss the molecular drivers of GISTs, the importance of molecular testing and directing therapy according to molecular targets, as well as future strategies in the management of advanced GISTs.

GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMOR: OUTCOMES OF THE PAST DECADE IN A REFERENCE INSTITUTION IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the digestive tract and has a wide variation in biological behavior; surgical resection remains the main form of treatment.

Micro-costing diagnostics in oncology: from single-gene testing to whole- genome sequencing

Purpose: Predictive diagnostics play an increasingly important role in personalized medicine for cancer treatment. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS)-based treatment selection is expected to rapidly increase worldwide. This study aimed to calculate and compare the total cost of currently used diagnostic techniques and of WGS in treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), melanoma, colorectal cancer (CRC), and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in the Netherlands.Methods: The activity-based costing (ABC) method was conducted to calculate total cost of included diagnostic techniques based on data provided by Dutch pathology laboratories and the Dutch-centralized cancer WGS facility. Costs were allocated to four categories: capital costs, maintenance costs, software costs, and operational costs.Results: The total cost per cancer patient per technique varied from € 58 (Sanger sequencing, three amplicons) to € 2925 (paired tumor-normal WGS). The operational costs accounted for the vast majority (over 90%) of the total per cancer patient technique costs.Conclusion: This study outlined in detail all costing aspects and cost prices of current and new diagnostic modalities used in treatment of NSCLC, melanoma, CRC, and GIST in the Netherlands. Detailed cost differences and value comparisons between these diagnostic techniques enable future economic evaluations to support decision-making.

An expanded universe of cancer targets

The characterization of cancer genomes has provided insight into somatically altered genes across tumors, transformed our understanding of cancer biology, and enabled tailoring of therapeutic strategies. However, the function of most cancer alleles remains mysterious, and many cancer features transcend their genomes. Consequently, tumor genomic characterization does not influence therapy for most patients. Approaches to understand the function and circuitry of cancer genes provide complementary approaches to elucidate both oncogene and non-oncogene dependencies. Emerging work indicates that the diversity of therapeutic targets engendered by non-oncogene dependencies is much larger than the list of recurrently mutated genes. Here we describe a framework for this expanded list of cancer targets, providing novel opportunities for clinical translation.

The management of metastatic GIST: current standard and investigational therapeutics

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. The majority of GISTs harbor gain of function mutations in either KIT or PDGFRα. Determination of the GIST molecular subtype upon diagnosis is important because this information informs therapeutic decisions in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting. The management of GIST was revolutionized by the introduction of imatinib, a KIT inhibitor, which has become the standard first line treatment for metastatic GIST. However, despite a clinical benefit rate of 80%, the majority of patients with GIST experience disease progression after 2-3 years of imatinib therapy. Second and third line options include sunitinib and regorafenib, respectively, and yield low response rates and limited clinical benefit. There have been recent FDA approvals for GIST including ripretinib in the fourth-line setting and avapritinib for PDGFRA exon 18-mutant GIST. This article aims to review the optimal treatment approach for the management of patients with advanced GIST. It examines the standard treatment options available but also explores the novel treatment approaches in the setting of imatinib refractory GIST.

Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA in the Management of Patients With GI Stromal Tumor: Analysis of 243 Patients

PURPOSE

GI stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common sarcoma of the GI tract. Management of patients with GIST is determined by KIT, PDGFRA, or other genomic alterations. Tissue-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis is the standard approach for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment selection. However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)–based NGS is a novel and noninvasive alternative.

METHODS

ctDNA sequencing results were evaluated in blood samples from 243 de-identified patients within the Guardant360 database. Under an approved institutional review board protocol, a retrospective analysis was performed on 45 single-institution patients.

RESULTS

Of 243 patients, 114 (47%) were women, and the median age was 59 years (range, 17-90 years). Patients with no alterations and variations of uncertain significance were excluded. Of the 162 patients with known pathogenic mutations, KIT was the most common (56%), followed by NF (7%), PDGFRA (6%), PI3KCA (6%), KRAS (5%), and others (6%). Most tumors harbored an actionable KIT or PDGFRA mutation. Our institutional cohort (n = 45) had 16 (35%) KIT exon 11 mutations, 3 (6%) KIT exon 9 mutations, and 1 (2%) PDGFRA mutation detected on ctDNA. Resistance mutations were observed in KIT exon 17 (8 patients), exon 13 (3 patients), and in both (3 patients). Our comparison of ctDNA with tissue NGS revealed a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%. Failure of concordance was observed in patients with localized or low disease burden. From the time of ctDNA testing, the median overall survival was not reached, whereas the median progression-free survival was 7 months.

CONCLUSION

ctDNA provides a rapid, noninvasive analysis of current mutations with a high PPV for patients with metastatic GIST. ctDNA-based testing may help to define the optimal choice of therapy on the basis of resistance mutations and should be studied prospectively.

Successful treatment with avapritinib in patient with mucosal metastatic melanoma

Metastatic vulvar melanoma is a rare and aggressive disease and survival is usually poor. Vulvar melanomas harbor BRAF V600 mutations only infrequently; consequently, target therapy is a rare therapeutic option and immunotherapy usually has only a weak effect. On the other hand, KIT mutations are rare in cutaneous melanomas, but relatively frequent in mucosal melanomas, particularly in vulvar-vaginal melanomas, and can be a therapeutic target. Herein, we report a clinical case of a patient with metastatic vulvar melanoma, harboring an exon 17 c-KIT mutation, treated with avapritinib (BLU-285) – a highly potent and selective oral kinase inhibitor designed to treat imatinib-resistant gastro-intestinal stromal tumors (GIST) by targeting KIT/PDGFRα activation loop mutants (exons 17/18). After failure of the combination of ipilimumab + nivolumab first and then nivolumab alone, the patient received avapritinib 300 mg/daily for central nervous system (CNS), lymph-nodal, right adrenal gland, lung, and subcutaneous metastases. Best response was partial remission, according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Time to treatment progression was 11 months. Main toxicities were grade 2 cutaneous vasculitis that required avapritinib discontinuation, and grade 2 uveitis of unknown origin, treated by vitrectomy and empiric antibiotic and antiviral therapy due to negative cultural tests. Uveitis was detected at the time of progression and therapy was definitively discontinued. In conclusion, avapritinib proved to be effective even in the presence of a pretreated disease, a high tumor burden, and brain metastases. In our experience, treatment was feasible and toxicity manageable. Considering the lack of effective therapies and the poor outcome of the disease, determination of c-KIT mutations should be performed routinely in cases of metastatic mucosal melanoma.

Molecular Profile of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Sixty-Eight Patients from a Single Swiss Institution

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract. It has distinct molecular features and primarily affects the KIT and PDGFRA genes.

OBJECTIVE

We wanted to assess the molecular profile of 68 GIST patients who were sequenced consecutively between 2014 and 2019 at our institute of pathology.

METHODS

Our cohort comprised 60 primary and 8 metastatic GIST patients; 43 and 57% of the cases, respectively, were analyzed by Sanger sequencing or next-generation sequencing (NGS).

RESULTS

Of the 60 primary GIST patients, 47 (78%) showed a KIT mutation; 2 cases showed a double KIT mutation, and 1 of these was a therapy-naive GIST. Nine (15%) patients harbored a PDGFRA mutation, 2 (3%) had a BRAF mutation, 1 (2%) had a PIK3CA mutation, and 1 (2%) did not show any mutation. One BRAF and the PIK3CA mutation have not been described in GIST before. All metastatic GIST harbored exclusively KIT mutations.

CONCLUSION

A retrospective analysis of GIST sequenced at our institute revealed incidences of KIT and PDGFRA mutations comparable to those in other cohorts from Europe. Interestingly, we found 2 previously undescribed mutations in the BRAF and PIK3CA genes as well as 1 treatment-naive case with a double KIT mutation in exon 11.

Giant gastric stromal tumor mimicking as a posterior mediastinal mass: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Mediastinal GISTs are rare and mostly arise from the esophagus.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 68-year-old woman with dysphagia who presented with a huge posterior mediastinal mass.

DIAGNOSES

The patient was diagnosed with a GIST through chest computed tomography (CT)-guided core biopsy of the mass.

INTERVENTIONS

Complete excision including the tumor, lower part of the esophagus and fundus of the stomach were performed.

OUTCOMES

On follow-up after 48 months, the patient is currently alive without any evidence of tumor recurrence.

LESSONS

The case highlights GISTs are taken into consideration in the differential diagnosis of posterior mediastinal masses.

LMTK3 is essential for oncogenic KIT expression in KIT-mutant GIST and melanoma

Certain cancers, including gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and subsets of melanoma, are caused by somatic KIT mutations that result in KIT receptor tyrosine kinase constitutive activity, which drives proliferation. The treatment of KIT-mutant GIST has been revolutionized with the advent of KIT-directed cancer therapies. KIT tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are superior to conventional chemotherapy in their ability to control advanced KIT-mutant disease. However, these therapies have a limited duration of activity due to drug-resistant secondary KIT mutations that arise (or that are selected for) during KIT TKI treatment. To overcome the problem of KIT TKI resistance, we sought to identify novel therapeutic targets in KIT-mutant GIST and melanoma cells using a human tyrosine kinome siRNA screen. From this screen, we identified lemur tyrosine kinase 3 (LMTK3) and herein describe its role as a novel KIT regulator in KIT-mutant GIST and melanoma cells. We find that LMTK3 regulated the translation rate of KIT, such that loss of LMTK3 reduced total KIT, and thus KIT downstream signaling in cancer cells. Silencing of LMTK3 decreased cell viability and increased cell death in KIT-dependent, but not KIT-independent GIST and melanoma cell lines. Notably, LMTK3 silencing reduced viability of all KIT-mutant cell lines tested, even those with drug-resistant KIT secondary mutations. Furthermore, targeting of LMTK3 with siRNA delayed KIT-dependent GIST growth in a xenograft model. Our data suggest the potential of LMTK3 as a target for treatment of patients with KIT-mutant cancer, particularly after failure of KIT TKIs.

SSAT State-of-the-Art Conference: Current Surgical Management of Gastric Tumors

INTRODUCTION

The current era of gastric surgery is marked by low morbidity and mortality rates, innovative strategies to approach resections with a minimally invasive fashion or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), as well as improved understanding of the biology of sporadic and hereditary stromal, neuroendocrine, and epithelial malignancies.

METHODS

In 2017, the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract convened a State-of-the-Art Conference on Current Surgical Management of Gastric Tumors with both international experts and emerging leaders in the field of gastric surgery.

RESULTS

Martin D. McCarter, MD of the University of Colorado discussed the current management of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Kaitlyn J. Kelly, MD of the University of California, San Diego discussed the management of gastric carcinoid tumors. Jeffrey A. Norton of Stanford University discussed recent advances in the management of gastric adenocarcinoma including a focus on hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC). Joseph Kim, MD of Stony Brook University discussed a systematic approach to minimally invasive gastrectomy for cancer. Joyce Wong, MD of Pennsylvania State University discussed the role for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC for gastric adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides gastrointestinal surgeons with a concise update on the current surgical management of gastric tumors.

Biochemical, Molecular, and Clinical Characterization of Succinate Dehydrogenase Subunit A Variants of Unknown Significance

Purpose: Patients who inherit a pathogenic loss-of-function genetic variant involving one of the four succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) subunit genes have up to an 86% chance of developing one or more cancers by the age of 50. If tumors are identified and removed early in these high-risk patients, they have a higher potential for cure. Unfortunately, many alterations identified in these genes are variants of unknown significance (VUS), confounding the identification of high-risk patients. If we could identify misclassified SDH VUS as benign or pathogenic SDH mutations, we could better select patients for cancer screening procedures and remove tumors at earlier stages.Experimental Design: In this study, we combine data from clinical observations, a functional yeast model, and a computational model to determine the pathogenicity of 22 SDHA VUS. We gathered SDHA VUS from two primary sources: The OHSU Knight Diagnostics Laboratory and the literature. We used a yeast model to identify the functional effect of a VUS on mitochondrial function with a variety of biochemical assays. The computational model was used to visualize variants' effect on protein structure.Results: We were able to draw conclusions on functional effects of variants using our three-prong approach to understanding VUS. We determined that 16 (73%) of the alterations are actually pathogenic, causing loss of SDH function, and six (27%) have no effect upon SDH function.Conclusions: We thus report the reclassification of the majority of the VUS tested as pathogenic, and highlight the need for more thorough functional assessment of inherited SDH variants. Clin Cancer Res; 23(21); 6733-43. ©2017 AACR.