Informed consent in clinical trials: Implementing methods to improve patient understanding in cancer research—A quality improvement initiative in a sarcoma trials unit

335

Background: Clinical trials are considered the cornerstone of improving outcomes for cancer patients. The understanding of an individual patient of the trial on which they are enrolled can vary significantly, with some studies demonstrating poor patient understanding of their involvement in trials. This exploratory study aimed to improve patient understanding of clinical trials and patient experience of the informed consent process by implementing measures to present complex trial information in alternative formats. Methods: The project was undertaken in a sarcoma trials unit in a specialist cancer treatment centre. Baseline knowledge was assessed using an adapted version of the Quality of Informed Consent (QuIC) questionnaire. A decision-aid was created following focus group discussions with stakeholders, focussing on key trial questions for patients, such as consent, the research description, risks, benefits, and alternatives to the trial. A patient education video was produced by the research team, explaining general aspects of clinical trials in patient-friendly language. The decision-aids and videos were distributed during the informed consent process of trial recruitment over a 12-week period. The patient group was assessed with post-intervention questionnaires. Statistical analysis was descriptive due to the small numbers. Results: Thirty sarcoma patients participated in the project, including baseline assessment of 15 patients previously enrolled on study, and 15 patients considering participation in a trial who underwent the intervention. 100% (n = 15) of the interventional group found the video and decision-aid useful. 60% (n = 18) of patients had a university level education, indicating a well-educated population. A pre- and post-intervention comparison demonstrated an improved understanding of 10 key elements of clinical trial information as shown in Table. Conclusions: Our exploratory study has shown that patient education tools including decision-aids and patient videos can be successfully implemented to help improve patient understanding of clinical trial information and may be of benefit in other trials units. Further larger studies are required to confirm these findings.[Table: see text]

Ripretinib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an overview of current evidence and drug approval

Over the past 20 years, the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors has acted as an important model in the advancement of molecularly targeted therapies for solid tumors. The success of imatinib has established it as a lasting therapy in the management of early-stage and advanced disease in the first-line setting. Imatinib resistance inevitably develops, resulting in the need for further lines of therapy. Ripretinib is an orally administered switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor, specifically developed to target both primary and secondary KIT and PDGFRα resistance mutations. Herein, the authors discuss the molecular rationale, the preclinical evidence and the clinical use of ripretinib in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the advanced stages of disease.

Efficacy of anti-PD-1 and ipilimumab alone or in combination in acral melanoma

BACKGROUND

Acral melanoma is a rare melanoma subtype with poor prognosis. Importantly, these patients were not identified as a specific subgroup in the landmark melanoma trials involving ipilimumab and the anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) agents nivolumab and pembrolizumab. There is therefore an absence of prospective clinical trial evidence regarding the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in this population. Acral melanoma has lower tumor mutation burden (TMB) than other cutaneous sites, and primary site is associated with differences in TMB. However the impact of this on the effectiveness of immune CPIs is unknown. We examined the efficacy of CPIs in acral melanoma, including by primary site.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable stage III/IV acral melanoma treated with CPI (anti-PD-1 and/or ipilimumab) were studied. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were conducted. Primary outcome was objective response rate (ORR); secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In total, 325 patients were included: 234 (72%) plantar, 69 (21%) subungual and 22 (7%) palmar primary sites. First CPI included: 184 (57%) anti-PD-1, 59 (18%) anti-PD-1/ipilimumab combination and 82 (25%) ipilimumab. ORR was significantly higher with initial anti-PD-1/ipilimumab compared with anti-PD-1 (43% vs 26%, HR 2.14, p=0.0004) and significantly lower with ipilimumab (15% vs 26%, HR 0.49, p=0.0016). Landmark PFS at 1 year was highest for anti-PD-1/ipilimumab at 34% (95% CI 24% to 49%), compared with 26% (95% CI 20% to 33%) with anti-PD-1 and 10% (95% CI 5% to 19%) with ipilimumab. Despite a trend for increased PFS, anti-PD-1/ipilimumab combination did not significantly improve PFS (HR 0.85, p=0.35) or OS over anti-PD-1 (HR 1.30, p=0.16), potentially due to subsequent therapies and high rates of acquired resistance. No outcome differences were found between primary sites.

CONCLUSION

While the ORR to anti-PD-1/ipilimumab was significantly higher than anti-PD-1 and PFS numerically higher, in this retrospective cohort this benefit did not translate to improved OS. Future trials should specifically include patients with acral melanoma, to help determine the optimal management of this important melanoma subtype.

Palbociclib in combination with aromatase inhibitors in patients ≥ 75 years with oestrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative advanced breast cancer: A real-world multicentre UK study

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer incidence increases with age and real-world data is essential to guide prescribing practices in the older population. The aim of this study was to collect large scale real-world data on tolerability and efficacy of palbociclib + AI in the first line treatment of ER+/HER2-advanced breast cancer in those aged ≥75 years.

METHODS

14 cancer centres participated in this national UK retrospective study. Patients aged ≥75 years treated with palbociclib + AI in the first line setting were identified. Data included baseline demographics, disease characteristics, toxicities, dose reductions and delays, treatment response and survival data. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess independent predictors of PFS, OS and toxicities.

RESULTS

276 patients met the eligibility criteria. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was low (2.2%). The clinical benefit rate was 87%. 50.7% of patients had dose reductions and 59.3% had dose delays. The 12- and 24- month PFS rates were 75.9% and 64.9%, respectively. The 12- and 24- month OS rates were 85.1% and 74.0%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified PS, Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) and number of metastatic sites to be independent predictors of PFS. Dose reductions and delays were not associated with adverse survival outcomes. Baseline ACCI was an independent predictor of development and severity of neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Palbociclib is an effective therapy in the real-world older population and is well-tolerated with low levels of clinically significant toxicities. The use of geriatric and frailty assessments can help guide decision making in these patients.

The potential utility of end-binding protein 1 (EB1) as response-predictive biomarker for lisavanbulin: A phase 2 study of lisavanbulin (BAL101553) in adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma

TPS2068

Background: Lisavanbulin (BAL101553, prodrug of BAL27862) is a novel tumor checkpoint controller that promotes tumor cell death by modulating the spindle assembly checkpoint. BAL27862 is a lipophilic, small molecule (MW 387) shown in rodents to penetrate the brain (1:1 plasma ratio) with promising antitumor activity in orthotopic models of glioblastoma (GB) as monotherapy or in combination with radiotherapy (RT) ± chemotherapy. In a completed phase 1 study (Lopez et al. ESMO 2020, NCT02490800) with daily oral lisavanbulin in patients with recurrent GB or high-grade glioma, the RP2D was determined at 25 mg/day. In this phase 1 study, two patients (out of 20 patients) with GB show a long-lasting (> 2 years) clinical benefit with improvement in clinical symptoms and in target and/or non-target GB lesions as per RANO criteria. Both patients show strong end-binding protein 1 (EB1) expression in their GB tissues as assessed by immunohistochemistry staining. EB1, a protein located on the plus-ends of microtubules, is involved in microtubule (MT) function and has been associated with stemness of glioma cells and a more aggressive disease. Data from GB mouse models suggest that EB1 is a predictive marker for response to lisavanbulin. The prevalence of EB1-positivity in GB is estimated at ̃5%. This ongoing phase 2 study is an extension of the completed Phase 1 study and is conducted to confirm prospectively whether EB1 is a response-predictive biomarker for lisavanbulin in GB. Methods: This is an ongoing multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study using a Simon Two-Stage design to assess the efficacy of lisavanbulin in patients with recurrent GB. The study is being performed in the UK, Switzerland and Germany. Patients with histologically-confirmed GB and recurrent disease after prior RT with alkylating chemotherapy (de-novo/primary GB) or after prior chemotherapy or RT (secondary GB), are eligible for enrollment if their GB archival tumor tissue is EB1-positive. EB1-positivity is defined as moderate to strong EB1-staining in at least 70% of GB tumor cells using a CE-marked immunohistochemistry Clinical Trial Assay (Targos Molecular Pathology GmbH). The primary study objective is the overall response rate by RANO, with MRI scans being performed every 8 weeks. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival and overall survival. Adverse events are assessed using CTCAEv5. To develop a potential RNA-based response signature, molecular profiling of tumor tissue is performed using whole transcriptome sequencing (RNAseq) in each patient enrolled in the study to define the genomic expression profiles in patients with EB1-positive GB. Nine evaluable patients are to be enrolled in Stage 1, and an additional 10 patients will be enrolled in stage 2 if at least 2 objective responses per RANO criteria are observed in stage 1. Clinical trial information: 02490800.

Real-world experience with doxorubicin and olaratumab in soft tissue sarcomas in England and Northern Ireland

Background

A randomised phase II trial demonstrated that the addition of olaratumab to doxorubicin significantly increased overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS) compared to doxorubicin alone. The recently presented phase III study of doxorubicin and olaratumab in advanced soft tissue sarcoma was discordant with this finding.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients with advanced-/metastatic STS treated with at least two cycles of doxorubicin and olaratumab at eight sarcoma units across England and Northern Ireland between May 2017 and March 2019.

Results

172 patients were evaluable and 40 patients (23.3%) had died at the time of analysis. Median ECOG performance status (PS) was 1. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.8 months (95% CI 5.9–7.7 months). Leiomyosarcoma was the most common histological subtype (75 patients, 43.6%), followed by liposarcomas (19, 11.0%). The mean number of cycles was 5 (doxorubicin range 2–6; olaratumab range 2–23). Two patients (1.2%) had a complete response and 34 (19.8%) had a partial response. 79 (45.9%) had stable and 58 (33.7%) progressive disease. 57 patients (33.1%) experienced grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and 7 patients (4.1%) grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia. Grade ≥ 3 anaemia was seen in 21 patients (12.2%). Grade ≥ 3 non-haematological toxicities were seen in 35 patients (20.3%). A clinically significant drop in left ventricular ejection fraction was seen in 6 patients (3.5%). 48 patients (27.9%) required a dose reduction. Overall survival (OS) is pending.

Conclusions

Our results are in keeping with the phase III study findings: response rate, PFS and OS were similar to those reported in the phase III ANNOUNCE trial.

The existence of inflammatory bowel lesions in gluten-sensitive enteropathy

Three patients with coincident coeliac disease and inflammatory bowel disease are described. In 2 patients with known coeliac disease the recurrence of diarrhoea was not due to dietary deviation but to an additional large bowel pathology.