Multistep tumor genetic evolution and changes in immunogenicity trigger immune-mediated disease eradication in stage IV melanoma: lessons from a single case

Durable remissions are observed in 10%-20% of treated patients with advanced metastatic melanoma but the factors associated with long-term complete clinical responses are largely unknown. Here, we report the molecular characteristics of tumor evolution during disease progression along a 9-year clinical course in a patient with advanced disseminated melanoma who received different treatments, including trametinib, ipilimumab, radiation, vemurafenib, surgical tumor debulking and a second ipilimumab course, ultimately achieving complete long-term disease remission.Longitudinal analyses of therapies-resistant metastatic tumors revealed the effects of different treatments on tumor's microenvironment and immunogenicity, ultimately creating a milieu favorable to immunotherapy response. Monitoring of the temporal dynamics of T cells by analysis of the T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire in the tumor and peripheral blood during disease evolution indicated that T-cell clones with common TCR rearrangements, present at low levels at baseline, were maintained and expanded after immunotherapy, and that TCR diversity increased. Analysis of genetic, molecular, and cellular components of the tumor depicted a multistep process in which treatment with kinase inhibitors strongly conditioned the immune microenvironment creating an inflamed milieu converting cold into hot tumors, while ipilimumab impacted and increased the TCR repertoire, a requirement for tumor rejection.Since the optimal sequencing of treatment with antibodies targeting immune checkpoints and kinase inhibitors for advanced melanoma is still clinically debated, this case indicates that immunotherapy success is possible even after progression on targeted therapy.

Long-term outcomes and persistent toxicities following BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy for advanced melanoma

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that approximately 20% of patients have 4-5 year progression free survival (PFS) on BRAF/MEK inhibitors. The long-term safety and efficacy in these patients with more durable responses have not been studied.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter cohort study assessed response, progression, and adverse events in patients from eight institutions in four countries with >4-year PFS following BRAF/MEK inhibitors.

RESULTS

Among 146 patients, 112 (76.7%) remained progression-free at median follow-up of 7.8 years from treatment start; 131 (89.7%) were alive. Among progressors (n = 34), 21 (62%) were on treatment at progression. Among those who discontinued treatment for reasons other than progression (toxicity, preference, etc.) (n = 68, with median 49 months treatment duration), 13 (19%) progressed (median 15.3 months from treatment cessation to progression). Surgery or radiation for single-organ progression resulted in durable benefit in 11 of 22 patients (50%). Subsequent systemic therapy included immune therapy (24% responded) and BRAF/MEK rechallenge (56% responded). Thirteen (8.9%) patients had ongoing toxicities at last follow-up, 10 (77%) of which remained on active treatment; all cardiac adverse events had resolved (n = 9). Twenty-four (16.4%) patients developed any new primary cancer, and 28 (19%) patients experienced other major health events.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 75% of patients with 4-year PFS from BRAF/MEK inhibitors had continued durable antitumor responses after nearly 8-year median follow-up, with similar results in patients who discontinued therapy for reasons other than progression. Long-term toxicities were uncommon and low-grade. These findings highlight the often-favourable outcomes in patients with extended benefit from BRAF/MEK inhibitors.

Systemic Therapy for Melanoma: ASCO Guideline Update

PURPOSE

To provide guidance to clinicians regarding the use of systemic therapy for melanoma.

METHODS

American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel and conducted an updated systematic review of the literature.

RESULTS

The updated review identified 21 additional randomized trials.

UPDATED RECOMMENDATIONS

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab was newly recommended for patients with resectable stage IIIB to IV cutaneous melanoma. For patients with resected cutaneous melanoma, adjuvant nivolumab or pembrolizumab was newly recommended for stage IIB-C disease and adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab was added as a potential option for stage IV disease. For patients with unresectable or metastatic cutaneous melanoma, nivolumab plus relatlimab was added as a potential option regardless of BRAF mutation status and nivolumab plus ipilimumab followed by nivolumab was preferred over BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy. Talimogene laherparepvec is no longer recommended as an option for patients with BRAF wild-type disease who have progressed on anti-PD-1 therapy. Ipilimumab- and ipilimumab-containing regimens are no longer recommended for patients with BRAF-mutated disease after progression on other therapies.This full update incorporates the new recommendations for uveal melanoma published in the 2022 Rapid Recommendation Update.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/melanoma-guidelines.

Potential risk factors, clinicopathological features and determinants of survival for multiple primary melanoma patients compared to single primary melanoma: a large single-center Italian study

Melanoma patients have a high risk of developing subsequent primary melanomas, a condition known as multiple primary melanoma (MPM). We aimed to compare risk factors of patients with MPM and single primary melanoma (SPM). Primary MPM and SPM consecutively treated at the National Cancer Institute in Milan, Italy, from 1978 to 2021 were retrospectively investigated. Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed. Multivariate hazard ratios and mortality were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Overall, 9122 patients with SPM and 944 with MPM were included. A total of 1437 and 85 deaths occurred in SPM and MPM group, respectively. Of these, 1315 (14.4%) within SPM patients and 60 (6.4%) in MPM group were melanoma-specific deaths (MSDs). Males had a higher risk for MPM (hazard ratio = 1.29), while age was not associated with MPM (hazard ratio = 0.98). The risk of MPM decreased by about 50% for Breslow thickness >1 mm, and by about 45 and 75% in presence of mitoses and ulceration, respectively. The multivariate hazard ratio of death for MPM compared to SPM patients was 0.85 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.67-1.06), while considering MSD the corresponding hazard ratio was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.71-1.22). Melanoma patients should receive regular follow-up with complete skin examination to detect early subsequent primary melanoma. Patients with more advanced primary have decreased risk of MPM, while males have higher risk. Our study reported no significant difference in mortality between SPM and MPM, but the issue is still open for discussion and further studies.

Association of Excision Margin Size With Local Recurrence and Survival in Patients With T1a Melanoma at Critical Structures

Importance

Melanoma guidelines recommend surgical excision with 10-mm margins for T1 melanoma. However, this procedure may be problematic at sites close to critical structures such as the scalp, face, external genitalia, acral, periumbilical, and perineal areas.

Objective

To compare outcomes of wide (10-mm margins) vs narrow (5-mm margins) excision in patients with T1a melanoma near critical structures.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study was a retrospective comparison of 1341 consecutive patients aged 18 years or older from the National Cancer Institute of Milan, Italy, diagnosed between 2001 and 2020 with T1a cutaneous melanoma close to critical structures who accepted wide excision vs narrow excision.

Exposures

Local recurrence and melanoma-specific mortality (MSM) rates with 5-mm vs 10-mm excision margins.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary aim of the study was to ascertain whether a narrower (5-mm) vs wider (10-mm) excision margin was associated with local recurrence and MSM. The secondary aim was to compare the need for reconstructive surgery in the groups defined by excision margin width. Between April 28 and August 7, 2022, associations were assessed by weighted Cox and Fine-Gray univariable and multivariable models.

Results

A total of 1179 patients met the inclusion criteria (median [IQR] age, 50.0 [39.5-63.0] years; female, 610 [51.7%]; male, 569 [49.3%]). Six hundred twenty-six patients (53.1%) received a wide excision (434 [69.3%] with linear repair and 192 [30.7%] with flap or graft reconstruction) and 553 (46.9%) received a narrow excision (491 [88.8%] with linear repair and 62 [11.2%] with flap or graft reconstruction). The weighted 10-year MSM was 1.8% (95% CI, 0.8%-4.2%) in the wide group and 4.2% (95% CI, 2.2%-7.9%) in the narrow group; the weighted 10-year local recurrence rate was 5.7% (95% CI, 3.9%-8.3%) in the wide group and 6.7% (95% CI, 4.7%-9.5%) in the narrow group. Breslow thickness greater than 0.4 mm (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] for 0.6 vs 0.4 mm, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.59-3.68; P < .001) and mitotic rate greater than 1/mm2 (sHR for a single increment, 3.35; 95% CI, 2.59-4.32; P < .001) were associated with worse MSM. Multivariable analysis showed that acral lentiginous melanoma, lentigo maligna melanoma, and increasing Breslow thickness were associated with a higher incidence of local recurrence.

Conclusions and Relevance

The study's findings suggest that local excision with 5-mm margins for T1a melanoma may not be associated with an increased risk of local recurrence. Breslow thickness greater than 0.4 mm, mitotic rate greater than 1/mm2, and acral lentiginous melanoma and lentigo maligna melanoma subtypes were associated with a higher risk of recurrence. These findings may be useful for future melanoma treatment guidelines.

Similar Local Recurrence and Survival in Patients with T1 Radial Growth Phase Melanoma on Head and Neck Treated with 5 mm or 10 mm Margins. A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Melanoma guidelines recommend surgical excision with 10 mm margins for T1 melanomas (invasive melanomas with Breslow thickness ≤1 mm), including those in radial growth phase, which are without metastatic potential; however, such margins may be problematic on head-and-neck.

OBJECTIVE

We compared outcomes of wide (10 mm margins) versus narrow (5 mm margins) excisions in patients with radial growth phase T1 melanoma on head-and-neck including face.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 610 consecutive patients excised with wide versus narrow margins, from 2001 to 2018, at six European centres. In all cases, radial growth phase, and clear margins with 5 or 10 mm of clearance, were ascertained histologically. Multivariable models investigated associations of margins and other factors with overall survival and local recurrence.

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixteen (51.8%) patients received wide excision, 219 (69.3%) with primary wound closure, 97 (30.7%) with reconstruction; 294 (48.2%) patients received narrow excision, 264 (89.8%) with primary wound closure, 30 (10.2%) with reconstruction (p<0.001). Median follow-ups were 88 months (wide) and 187 months (narrow) (inter-quartile ranges 43-133 and 79-206, respectively). Ten-year overall survival (95% confidence interval) was 96.7% (94.2-99.3%) in wide and 98.2% (96.4-100%) in narrow patients. Ten-year local recurrence incidence was 6.4% (4.1-10.1%) in wide and 7.8% (5.3-11.6%) in narrow groups. Lentigo maligna melanoma subtype appeared associated with increased risk of local recurrence in narrow versus wide patients (15.0% versus 7.5%; P=0.190).

CONCLUSIONS

Narrower excision margins for T1 radial growth phase melanoma are not associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio 0.97, P=0.996) or increased local recurrence (subdistribution hazard ratio: 0.87; P=0.751) compared to wider margins, and may be safely applied to such lesions, although caution may be required in the presence of lentigo maligna melanoma.

Landscape of immune-related signatures induced by targeting of different epigenetic regulators in melanoma: implications for immunotherapy

Background

Improvement of efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) remains a major clinical goal. Association of ICB with immunomodulatory epigenetic drugs is an option. However, epigenetic inhibitors show a heterogeneous landscape of activities. Analysis of transcriptional programs induced in neoplastic cells by distinct classes of epigenetic drugs may foster identification of the most promising agents.

Methods

Melanoma cell lines, characterized for mutational and differentiation profile, were treated with inhibitors of DNA methyltransferases (guadecitabine), histone deacetylases (givinostat), BET proteins (JQ1 and OTX-015), and enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (GSK126). Modulatory effects of epigenetic drugs were evaluated at the gene and protein levels. Master molecules explaining changes in gene expression were identified by Upstream Regulator (UR) analysis. Gene set enrichment and IPA were used respectively to test modulation of guadecitabine-specific gene and UR signatures in baseline and on-treatment tumor biopsies from melanoma patients in the Phase Ib NIBIT-M4 Guadecitabine + Ipilimumab Trial. Prognostic significance of drug-specific immune-related genes was tested with Timer 2.0 in TCGA tumor datasets.

Results

Epigenetic drugs induced different profiles of gene expression in melanoma cell lines. Immune-related genes were frequently upregulated by guadecitabine, irrespective of the mutational and differentiation profiles of the melanoma cell lines, to a lesser extent by givinostat, but mostly downregulated by JQ1 and OTX-015. GSK126 was the least active drug. Quantitative western blot analysis confirmed drug-specific modulatory profiles. Most of the guadecitabine-specific signature genes were upregulated in on-treatment NIBIT-M4 tumor biopsies, but not in on-treatment lesions of patients treated only with ipilimumab. A guadecitabine-specific UR signature, containing activated molecules of the TLR, NF-kB, and IFN innate immunity pathways, was induced in drug-treated melanoma, mesothelioma and hepatocarcinoma cell lines and in a human melanoma xenograft model. Activation of guadecitabine-specific UR signature molecules in on-treatment tumor biopsies discriminated responding from non-responding NIBIT-M4 patients. Sixty-five % of the immune-related genes upregulated by guadecitabine were prognostically significant and conferred a reduced risk in the TCGA cutaneous melanoma dataset.

Conclusions

The DNMT inhibitor guadecitabine emerged as the most promising immunomodulatory agent among those tested, supporting the rationale for usage of this class of epigenetic drugs in combinatorial immunotherapy approaches.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13046-022-02529-5.

Clinical Management of Melanocytic Tumours of Uncertain Malignant Potential (MelTUMPs), including Melanocytomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Little guidance is currently available for managing patients with melanocytic tumours of uncertain malignant potential (MelTUMPs, including melanocytomas), in particular the optimal excision margins and whether to offer sentinel node biopsy (SNB). The objective of this review is to evaluate excision margins and the prognostic utility of SNB by systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched to October 2021 for studies of patients with MelTUMPs reporting excision margins and/or SNB-positivity. Meta-analysis was performed on the SNB-positivity rate using a random effects model, followed by sensitivity analyses on subgroups. 111 primary studies reported excision margins and/or SNB data for 1962 patients. Follow-up was available for 1649 patients: 1561 (94.7%) were alive without disease at last review, 53 (3.2%) had developed further disease, 29 (1.8%) had died of metastatic disease (melanoma) and six (0.4%) died of unrelated causes. SNB was performed in 837 patients. The pooled positivity rate on meta-analysis was 32% (95% CI: 23-44%). Clinical outcome could be correlated with excision margin in only 171 patients (60% of those with known follow up) and was therefore not analysed further. Evidence indicating the ideal excision margins for MelTUMPs was lacking. SNB had a high positivity rate despite very low rates of recurrence or melanoma-related death. Consequently, SNB should not be offered routinely for MelTUMPs (including melanocytomas), due to its lack of prognostic utility for this tumour type (high certainty of evidence).

Efficacy of anti-PD-1 and ipilimumab alone or in combination in acral melanoma

BACKGROUND

Acral melanoma is a rare melanoma subtype with poor prognosis. Importantly, these patients were not identified as a specific subgroup in the landmark melanoma trials involving ipilimumab and the anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) agents nivolumab and pembrolizumab. There is therefore an absence of prospective clinical trial evidence regarding the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in this population. Acral melanoma has lower tumor mutation burden (TMB) than other cutaneous sites, and primary site is associated with differences in TMB. However the impact of this on the effectiveness of immune CPIs is unknown. We examined the efficacy of CPIs in acral melanoma, including by primary site.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable stage III/IV acral melanoma treated with CPI (anti-PD-1 and/or ipilimumab) were studied. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were conducted. Primary outcome was objective response rate (ORR); secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In total, 325 patients were included: 234 (72%) plantar, 69 (21%) subungual and 22 (7%) palmar primary sites. First CPI included: 184 (57%) anti-PD-1, 59 (18%) anti-PD-1/ipilimumab combination and 82 (25%) ipilimumab. ORR was significantly higher with initial anti-PD-1/ipilimumab compared with anti-PD-1 (43% vs 26%, HR 2.14, p=0.0004) and significantly lower with ipilimumab (15% vs 26%, HR 0.49, p=0.0016). Landmark PFS at 1 year was highest for anti-PD-1/ipilimumab at 34% (95% CI 24% to 49%), compared with 26% (95% CI 20% to 33%) with anti-PD-1 and 10% (95% CI 5% to 19%) with ipilimumab. Despite a trend for increased PFS, anti-PD-1/ipilimumab combination did not significantly improve PFS (HR 0.85, p=0.35) or OS over anti-PD-1 (HR 1.30, p=0.16), potentially due to subsequent therapies and high rates of acquired resistance. No outcome differences were found between primary sites.

CONCLUSION

While the ORR to anti-PD-1/ipilimumab was significantly higher than anti-PD-1 and PFS numerically higher, in this retrospective cohort this benefit did not translate to improved OS. Future trials should specifically include patients with acral melanoma, to help determine the optimal management of this important melanoma subtype.

Acral lentiginous melanoma histotype predicts outcome in clinical stage I-II melanoma patients: an International multicenter study

BACKGROUND

In the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification, acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) histotype ALM is not included as an independent prognostic factor; in small series its negative prognostic impact on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) has been linked to the greater Breslow thickness (BT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was carried out at four referral melanoma centers (three Italian and one Polish). Clinical consecutive patients with stage I-II melanoma, who were diagnosed, treated, and followed up between January 1998 and March 2018 in annotated specific databases were included.

RESULTS

Overall, 6734 were evaluable, 4349 with superficial spreading melanoma (SSM), 2132 with nodular melanoma (NM), and 253 with ALM. At univariable analysis, a statistically significant worse DFS [hazard ratio (HR) 2.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.24-3.30; P < 0.001] and OS (HR 2.67, 95% CI 2.15-3.32; P < 0.001) were found in patients with ALM compared with SSM. Similarly, the NM histotype was associated with a worse prognosis compared with the SSM histotype (DFS: HR 2.29, 95% CI 2.08-2.52; P < 0.001 and OS: HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.99-2.46; P < 0.001). At multivariable analysis, after adjusting for age, sex, BT, ulceration, and the sentinel lymph node status, a statistically significant worse DFS [adjusted HR (aHR; ALM versus SSM) 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.52; P = 0.028] was confirmed for patients with ALM. For patients with NM, instead, no impact of histology was found in terms of DFS [aHR (NM versus SSM) 1.04, 95% CI 0.93-1.15; P = 0.513] and OS [aHR (NM versus SSM) 0.96, 95% CI 0.86-1.08; P = 0.548].

CONCLUSIONS

ALM is associated with a worse long-term DFS. Our results could have important clinical implications for patients' stratification in future clinical trials and the incorporation of ALM histotype in the new AJCC classification as an independent prognostic factor.

Liquid biopsy and radiological response predict outcomes following discontinuation of targeted therapy in patients with BRAF mutated melanoma

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma discontinuing BRAF-targeted therapy for cumulative toxicity after sustained response are unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective case series analysis conducted at a single Cancer Center in Italy included patients with BRAF mutated metastatic melanoma treated with a BRAF inhibitor as a single agent or in combination with a MEK inhibitor between June 1, 2011 and January 1, 2020 and interrupting treatment after achieving complete response (CR) or long-lasting partial response (PR - i.e. > 12 months) due to cumulative toxicity.

RESULTS

We included 24 patients with a median treatment duration of 59.4 months (95%CI 55.4-63.4 - range 12-88). CR and PR were achieved in 71% and 29% of patients, respectively. At a median follow-up after treatment discontinuation of 37.8 months (95%CI 33.7-41.9), 12-months progression free survival after discontinuation (dPFS) rate was 70.8% (95%CI 54.8 - 91.6) and 24-months dPFS rate was 58.3% (95%CI 41.6 - 81.8). Baseline patients and tumor characteristics as well as treatment duration and best response did not significantly impact on dPFS. Patients with CR and negative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at time of discontinuation had a significantly improved dPFS compared to patients with either radiological residual disease or ctDNA positivity (P = 0.007). No patient in CR with undetectable ctDNA experienced progression.

CONCLUSION

The risk of progression is high even in patients with sustained sensitivity to BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Integration of liquid biopsy in clinical trials investigating optimal management of patients with sustained sensitivity to BRAF/MEK inhibitors is warranted.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma discontinuing BRAF-targeted therapy for cumulative toxicity are unknown. We analyzed patients with sustained responses (median treatment duration 59.4 months). Twelve and 24-months progression free survival following discontinuation were 70.8% and 58.3% respectively. Complete response and negative ctDNA at time of discontinuation are promising prognostic biomarkers in this setting.

Survival in Patients With Sentinel Node-Positive Melanoma With Extranodal Extension

BACKGROUND

Prognostic parameters in sentinel node (SN)-positive melanoma are important indicators to identify patients at high risk of recurrence who should be candidates for adjuvant therapy. We aimed to evaluate the presence of melanoma cells beyond the SN capsule-extranodal extension (ENE)-as a prognostic factor in patients with positive SNs.

METHODS

Data from 1,047 patients with melanoma and positive SNs treated from 2001 to 2020 at the Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori in Milano, Italy, were retrospectively investigated. Kaplan-Meier survival and crude cumulative incidence of recurrence curves were estimated. A multivariable logistic model was used to investigate the association between ENE and selected predictive factors. Cox models estimated the effect of the selected predictors on survival endpoints.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 69 months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 62.5% and 71.7% for patients with positive SNs with and without ENE, respectively. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 54.0% and 64.0% for patients with positive SNs with and without ENE, respectively. The multivariable logistic model showed that age, size of the main metastatic focus in the SN, and numbers of metastatic non-SNs were associated with ENE (all P<.0001). The multivariable Cox regression models showed the estimated prognostic effects of ENE associated with age, ulceration, size of the main metastatic focus in the SN, and number of metastatic non-SNs (all P<.0001) on disease-free survival and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

ENE was a significant prognostic factor in patients with positive-SN melanoma. This parameter may be useful in clinical practice as a selection criterion for adjuvant treatment in patients with stage IIIA disease with a tumor burden <1 mm in the SN. We recommend its inclusion as an independent prognostic determinant in future updates of melanoma guidelines.

Melanoma recurrence patterns and management after adjuvant targeted therapy: a multicentre analysis

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant targeted therapy (TT) improves relapse free survival in patients with resected BRAF mutant stage III melanoma. The outcomes and optimal management of patients who relapse after adjuvant TT is unknown.

METHODS

Patients from twenty-one centres with recurrent melanoma after adjuvant TT were included. Disease characteristics, adjuvant therapy, recurrence, treatment at relapse and outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients developed recurrent melanoma; nineteen (22%) during adjuvant TT. Median time to first recurrence was 18 months and median follow-up from first recurrence was 31 months. Fifty-eight (68%) patients received immunotherapy (IT) or TT as 1st line systemic therapy at either first or subsequent recurrence and had disease that was assessable for response. Response to anti-PD-1 (±trial agent), combination ipilimumab-nivolumab, TT rechallenge and ipilimumab monotherapy was 63%, 62% 25% and 10% respectively. Twenty-eight (33%) patients had died at census, all from melanoma. Two-year OS was 84% for anti-PD-1 therapy (±trial agent), 92% for combination ipilimumab and nivolumab, 49% for TT and 45% for ipilimumab monotherapy (p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who relapse after adjuvant TT respond well to subsequent anti-PD-1 based therapy and have outcomes similar to those seen when first line anti-PD-1 therapy is used in stage IV melanoma.

Systemic Therapy for Melanoma: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide guidance to clinicians regarding the use of systemic therapy for melanoma.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature.

RESULTS

A systematic review, one meta-analysis, and 34 additional randomized trials were identified. The published studies included a wide range of systemic therapies in cutaneous and noncutaneous melanoma.

RECOMMENDATIONS

In the adjuvant setting, nivolumab or pembrolizumab should be offered to patients with resected stage IIIA/B/C/D BRAF wild-type cutaneous melanoma, while either of those two agents or the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib should be offered in BRAF-mutant disease. No recommendation could be made for or against the use of neoadjuvant therapy in cutaneous melanoma. In the unresectable/metastatic setting, ipilimumab plus nivolumab, nivolumab alone, or pembrolizumab alone should be offered to patients with BRAF wild-type cutaneous melanoma, while those three regimens or combination BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy with dabrafenib/trametinib, encorafenib/binimetinib, or vemurafenib/cobimetinib should be offered in BRAF-mutant disease. Patients with mucosal melanoma may be offered the same therapies recommended for cutaneous melanoma. No recommendation could be made for or against specific therapy for uveal melanoma. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/melanoma-guidelines.

The role of sentinel lymph node status performed in melanoma patients with local recurrence or in transit metastasis

BACKGROUND

Sentinel Node Biopsy (SNB) is routinely performed for primary melanoma, but its role in the treatment of Local Recurrence (LR) and In-Transit metastasis (IT) is controversial. This study aims to assess the role of SNB in melanoma patients who developed first loco-regional recurrence.

METHODS

A series of consecutive melanoma patients who received SNB for a first IT or LR at the National Cancer Institute of Milan, Italy, from 2000 to 2015 were selected from a prospective database. Clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients met selection criteria. Forty-three patients (59.7%) received SNB for LR and 29 (40.3%) for IT. The average interval between treatment of primitive melanoma and first recurrence diagnosis was 19 months (interquartile range: 6.9-49.0). SN identification rate was 97.2%. SN positivity was detected in 26 (37.1%) patients. The SN-positive ratein melanoma patients who had LR or IT was significantly higher than reported for primary tumours. Of patients with nodal involvement 17 had LR and 9 IT lesions. Disease Free Survival (DFS) was slightly higher in SN negative patients, in the absence of statistically significant differences. Overall Survival (OS) analysis showed similar values in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Since DFS and OS do not show significant differences between SN negative and positive patients, our data do not give clear indications about performing SNB in case of first LR or IT. However, we suggest submitting patients with LR to this procedure to obtain a more accurate staging and eventually candidate these patients to adjuvant treatment.

Analysis of Sentinel Node Biopsy and Clinicopathologic Features as Prognostic Factors in Patients With Atypical Melanocytic Tumors

BACKGROUND

Atypical melanocytic tumors (AMTs) include a wide spectrum of melanocytic neoplasms that represent a challenge for clinicians due to the lack of a definitive diagnosis and the related uncertainty about their management. This study analyzed clinicopathologic features and sentinel node status as potential prognostic factors in patients with AMTs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinicopathologic and follow-up data of 238 children, adolescents, and adults with histologically proved AMTs consecutively treated at 12 European centers from 2000 through 2010 were retrieved from prospectively maintained databases. The binary association between all investigated covariates was studied by evaluating the Spearman correlation coefficients, and the association between progression-free survival and all investigated covariates was evaluated using univariable Cox models. The overall survival and progression-free survival curves were established using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 126 months (interquartile range, 104-157 months). All patients received an initial diagnostic biopsy followed by wide (1 cm) excision. Sentinel node biopsy was performed in 139 patients (58.4%), 37 (26.6%) of whom had sentinel node positivity. There were 4 local recurrences, 43 regional relapses, and 8 distant metastases as first events. Six patients (2.5%) died of disease progression. Five patients who were sentinel node-negative and 3 patients who were sentinel node-positive developed distant metastases. Ten-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 97% (95% CI, 94.9%-99.2%) and 82.2% (95% CI, 77.3%-87.3%), respectively. Age, mitotic rate/mm2, mitoses at the base of the lesion, lymphovascular invasion, and 9p21 loss were factors affecting prognosis in the whole series and the sentinel node biopsy subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Age >20 years, mitotic rate >4/mm2, mitoses at the base of the lesion, lymphovascular invasion, and 9p21 loss proved to be worse prognostic factors in patients with ATMs. Sentinel node status was not a clear prognostic predictor.

miR-146a-5p impairs melanoma resistance to kinase inhibitors by targeting COX2 and regulating NFkB-mediated inflammatory mediators

Background

Targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors has improved the survival of patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma, but most patients relapse upon the onset of drug resistance induced by mechanisms including genetic and epigenetic events. Among the epigenetic alterations, microRNA perturbation is associated with the development of kinase inhibitor resistance. Here, we identified and studied the role of miR-146a-5p dysregulation in melanoma drug resistance.

Methods

The miR-146a-5p-regulated NFkB signaling network was identified in drug-resistant cell lines and melanoma tumor samples by expression profiling and knock-in and knock-out studies. A bioinformatic data analysis identified COX2 as a central gene regulated by miR-146a-5p and NFkB. The effects of miR-146a-5p/COX2 manipulation were studied in vitro in cell lines and with 3D cultures of treatment-resistant tumor explants from patients progressing during therapy.

Results

miR-146a-5p expression was inversely correlated with drug sensitivity and COX2 expression and was reduced in BRAF and MEK inhibitor-resistant melanoma cells and tissues. Forced miR-146a-5p expression reduced COX2 activity and significantly increased drug sensitivity by hampering prosurvival NFkB signaling, leading to reduced proliferation and enhanced apoptosis. Similar effects were obtained by inhibiting COX2 by celecoxib, a clinically approved COX2 inhibitor.

Conclusions

Deregulation of the miR-146a-5p/COX2 axis occurs in the development of melanoma resistance to targeted drugs in melanoma patients. This finding reveals novel targets for more effective combination treatment.

Five-Year Analysis of Adjuvant Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Stage III Melanoma

BACKGROUND

In the previously reported primary analysis of this phase 3 trial, 12 months of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib resulted in significantly longer relapse-free survival than placebo in patients with resected stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations. To confirm the stability of the relapse-free survival benefit, longer-term data were needed.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 870 patients who had resected stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations to receive 12 months of oral dabrafenib (at a dose of 150 mg twice daily) plus trametinib (2 mg once daily) or two matched placebos. The primary end point was relapse-free survival. Here, we report 5-year results for relapse-free survival and survival without distant metastasis as the site of the first relapse. Overall survival was not analyzed, since the required number of events to trigger the final overall survival analysis had not been reached.

RESULTS

The minimum duration of follow-up was 59 months (median patient follow-up, 60 months for dabrafenib plus trametinib and 58 months for placebo). At 5 years, the percentage of patients who were alive without relapse was 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48 to 58) with dabrafenib plus trametinib and 36% (95% CI, 32 to 41) with placebo (hazard ratio for relapse or death, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.61). The percentage of patients who were alive without distant metastasis was 65% (95% CI, 61 to 71) with dabrafenib plus trametinib and 54% (95% CI, 49 to 60) with placebo (hazard ratio for distant metastasis or death, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.70). No clinically meaningful between-group difference in the incidence or severity of serious adverse events was reported during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

In the 5-year follow-up of a phase 3 trial involving patients who had resected stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations, 12 months of adjuvant therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib resulted in a longer duration of survival without relapse or distant metastasis than placebo with no apparent long-term toxic effects. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis; COMBI-AD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01682083; EudraCT number, 2012-001266-15.).

Long-term benefit of adjuvant dabrafenib + trametinib (D+T) in patients (pts) with resected stage III BRAF V600–mutant melanoma: Five-year analysis of COMBI-AD

10001

Background: Previous results of the COMBI-AD trial (NCT01682083) showed a significant relapse-free survival (RFS) benefit with 12 mo of adjuvant D+T vs placebo (PBO) in pts with high-risk resected stage III BRAF V600E/K–mutant melanoma. In the primary analysis, 3-year RFS rates with D+T vs PBO were 58% vs 39% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.39-0.58]; P < .001). An interim analysis of overall survival (OS) yielded 3-year OS rates of 86% with D+T vs 77% with PBO (HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.42-0.79]). Here we report data from 5-year analyses including long-term RFS and an updated cure rate model. Methods: COMBI-AD is a randomized, Phase III trial evaluating 12 mo of adjuvant D 150 mg twice daily + T 2 mg once daily vs 2 matched PBOs in pts with resected stage III BRAF V600E/K–mutant melanoma. Pts were stratified by BRAF status and disease stage (per AJCC 7 criteria). The primary endpoint is RFS; secondary endpoints include OS and distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS). A Weibull mixture cure rate model was applied to estimate the fraction of pts who will remain relapse free in the long term. As all patients had completed treatment by the time of the primary analysis, updated safety analyses were not performed. Results: This analysis represents a median follow-up of 60 mo for the D+T arm and 59 mo for the PBO arm. As of the data cutoff (Nov 8, 2019), 190 of 438 pts in the D+T arm and 262 of 432 pts in the PBO arm had an RFS event. Median RFS was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 47.9 mo-NR) with D+T vs 16.6 mo (95% CI, 12.7-22.1 mo) with PBO (HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.42-0.61]). The 4- and 5-year RFS rates were 55% (95% CI, 50%-60%) and 52% (95% CI, 48%-58%) with D+T vs 38% (95% CI, 34%-43%) and 36% (95% CI, 32%-41%) with PBO. These findings match those estimated by the cure rate model. The RFS benefit with D+T was evident across all AJCC 7 substages (HR [95% CI]: IIIA, 0.61 [0.35-1.07]; IIIB, 0.50 [0.37-0.67]; IIIC, 0.48 [0.36-0.64]). Median DMFS was NR in either arm but favored D+T (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.44-0.70]). OS was not updated at this data cutoff as the prespecified number of events for the final OS analysis had not yet occurred. Conclusions: This 5-year analysis confirms the long-term benefit of adjuvant D+T in pts with resected stage III BRAF V600E/K–mutant melanoma. Clinical trial information: NCT01682083.

Factors Affecting Sentinel Node Metastasis in Thin (T1) Cutaneous Melanomas: Development and External Validation of a Predictive Nomogram

PURPOSE

Thin melanomas (T1; ≤ 1 mm) constitute 70% of newly diagnosed cutaneous melanomas. Regional node metastasis determined by sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is an important prognostic factor for T1 melanoma. However, current melanoma guidelines do not provide clear indications on when to perform SNB in T1 disease and stress an individualized approach to SNB that considers all clinicopathologic risk factors. We aimed to identify determinants of sentinel node (SN) status for incorporation into an externally validated nomogram to better select patients with T1 disease for SNB.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The development cohort comprised 3,666 patients with T1 disease consecutively treated at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori (Milan, Italy) between 2001 and 2018; 4,227 patients with T1 disease treated at 13 other European centers over the same period formed the validation cohort. A random forest procedure was applied to the development data set to select characteristics associated with SN status for inclusion in a multiple binary logistic model from which a nomogram was elaborated. Decision curve analyses assessed the clinical utility of the nomogram.

RESULTS

Of patients in the development cohort, 1,635 underwent SNB; 108 patients (6.6%) were SN positive. By univariable analysis, age, growth phase, Breslow thickness, ulceration, mitotic rate, regression, and lymphovascular invasion were significantly associated with SN status. The random forest procedure selected 6 variables (not growth phase) for inclusion in the logistic model and nomogram. The nomogram proved well calibrated and had good discriminative ability in both cohorts. Decision curve analyses revealed the superior net benefit of the nomogram compared with each individual variable included in it as well as with variables suggested by current guidelines.

CONCLUSION

We propose the nomogram as a decision aid in all patients with T1 melanoma being considered for SNB.

Association between baseline disease characteristics and relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients (pts) with BRAF V600-mutant resected stage III melanoma treated with adjuvant dabrafenib (D) + trametinib (T) or placebo (PBO)

9582

Background: In the COMBI-AD trial (NCT01682083), 12 mo of adjuvant D+T led to significant improvement of RFS vs PBO (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; P < .001) in pts with resected BRAF V600–mutant stage III melanoma; 3- and 4-year RFS rates were 59% and 54%, respectively. Previous results demonstrated consistent treatment benefit across baseline disease stage according to AJCC edition 7 or 8. Here, we further explored the association between baseline disease characteristics and RFS to identify pt subgroups likely to benefit from adjuvant treatment. Methods: Randomized pts with completely resected BRAF V600E/K–mutant stage III melanoma received 12 mo of adjuvant D (150 mg BID) + T (2 mg QD) or PBO. Within each subgroup, predictive value was explored using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and HRs were calculated using a Pike estimator. Results: Minimum follow-up was 40 mo for 870 enrolled pts (D+T, 438; PBO, 432). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated treatment benefit across all subgroups analyzed. Assessment of RFS by extent of primary tumor (T stage) showed consistent benefit favoring D+T vs PBO (HR [95% CI]; T1, 0.42 [0.25-0.70]; T2, 0.51 [0.34-0.76]; T3, 0.55 [0.39-0.77]; T4, 0.42 [0.29-0.60]). HRs by nodal burden (N stage) also showed consistent treatment benefit (N1, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.37-0.72]; N2, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.28-0.53]; N3, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.41-0.83]). Substantial treatment benefit was observed in pts with baseline in-transit metastases (HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.24-0.82]) and those with no in-transit metastases detected at baseline (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.40-0.60]). When RFS was assessed according to melanoma presentation, treatment benefit favoring D+T vs PBO was observed in pts with superficial spreading melanoma (HR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.35-0.66]) and those with nodular melanoma (HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.37-0.75]). Conclusions: These results confirm earlier findings showing that treatment benefit with adjuvant D+T vs PBO is independent of baseline factors. Clinical trial information: NCT01682083.

Patient-reported outcomes in patients with resected, high-risk melanoma with BRAFV600E or BRAFV600K mutations treated with adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib (COMBI-AD): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

In the phase 3 COMBI-AD study, patients with resected, stage III melanoma with BRAF^V600E or BRAF^V600K mutations received adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib or placebo. The primary analysis showed that dabrafenib plus trametinib significantly improved relapse-free survival at 3 years. These results led to US Food and Drug Administration approval of dabrafenib plus trametinib as adjuvant treatment for patients with resected stage III melanoma with BRAF^V600E or BRAF^V600K mutations. Here, we report the patient-reported outcomes from COMBI-AD.

METHODS

COMBI-AD was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study done at 169 sites in 25 countries. Study participants were aged 18 years or older and had complete resection of stage IIIA (lymph node metastases >1 mm), IIIB, or IIIC cutaneous melanoma as per American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition criteria, with BRAF^V600E or BRAF^V600K mutations, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice response system, stratified by mutation type and disease stage, to receive oral dabrafenib (150 mg twice daily) plus oral trametinib (2 mg once daily) or matching placebos for 12 months. Patients, physicians, and the investigators who analysed the data were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival, reported elsewhere. Health-related quality of life, reported here, was a prespecified exploratory endpoint, and was assessed with the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire in the intention-to-treat population. We used a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis to assess differences in health-related quality of life between groups. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01682083. The trial is ongoing, but is no longer recruiting participants.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 31, 2013, and Dec 11, 2014, 870 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive dabrafenib plus trametinib (n=438) or matching placebos (n=432). Data were collected until the data cutoff for analyses of the primary endpoint (June 30, 2017). The median follow-up was 34 months (IQR 28-39) in the dabrafenib plus trametinib group and 33 months (20·5-39) in the placebo group. During the 12-month treatment phase, there were no significant or clinically meaningful changes from baseline between groups in EQ-5D-3L visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) or utility scores. During treatment, there were no clinically meaningful differences in VAS scores or utility scores in the dabrafenib plus trametinib group between patients who did and did not experience the most common adverse events. During long-term follow-up (range 15-48 months), VAS and utility scores were similar between groups and did not differ from baseline scores. At recurrence, there were significant decreases in VAS scores in both the dabrafenib plus trametinib group (mean change -6·02, SD 20·57; p=0·0032) and the placebo group (-6·84, 20·86; p<0·0001); the mean change in utility score also differed significantly at recurrence for both groups (dabrafenib plus trametinib -0·0626, 0·1911, p<0·0001; placebo -0·0748, 0·2182, p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

These findings show that dabrafenib plus trametinib did not affect patient-reported outcome scores during or after adjuvant treatment, and suggest that preventing or delaying relapse with adjuvant therapy could be beneficial in this setting.

FUNDING

Novartis.

An actionable axis linking NFATc2 to EZH2 controls the EMT-like program of melanoma cells

Discovery of new actionable targets and functional networks in melanoma is an urgent need as only a fraction of metastatic patients achieves durable clinical benefit by targeted therapy or immunotherapy approaches. Here we show that NFATc2 expression is associated with an EMT-like transcriptional program and with an invasive melanoma phenotype, as shown by analysis of melanoma cell lines at the mRNA and protein levels, interrogation of the TCGA melanoma dataset and characterization of melanoma lesions by immunohistochemistry. Gene silencing or pharmacological inhibition of NFATc2 downregulated EMT-related genes and AXL, and suppressed c-Myc, FOXM1, and EZH2. Targeting of c-Myc suppressed FOXM1 and EZH2, while targeting of FOXM1 suppressed EZH2. Inhibition of c-Myc, or FOXM1, or EZH2 downregulated EMT-related gene expression, upregulated MITF and suppressed migratory and invasive activity of neoplastic cells. Stable silencing of NFATc2 impaired melanoma cell proliferation in vitro and tumor growth in vivo in SCID mice. In NFATc2⁺ EZH2⁺ melanoma cell lines pharmacological co-targeting of NFATc2 and EZH2 exerted strong anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity, irrespective of BRAF or NRAS mutations and of BRAF inhibitor resistance. These results provide preclinical evidence for a role of NFATc2 in shaping the EMT-like melanoma phenotype and reveal a targetable vulnerability associated with NFATc2 and EZH2 expression in melanoma cells belonging to different mutational subsets.

Longer Follow-Up Confirms Relapse-Free Survival Benefit With Adjuvant Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib in Patients With Resected BRAF V600-Mutant Stage III Melanoma

PURPOSE

Dabrafenib plus trametinib improved relapse-free survival (RFS) versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; P < .001) in patients with resected BRAF V600-mutant stage III melanoma (BRF115532; COMBI-AD; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01682083). We present an updated RFS analysis on the basis of extended study follow-up and a cure-rate model analysis to estimate the fraction of patients expected to remain relapse free long term.

METHODS

In this phase III trial, patients with resected BRAF V600-mutant stage III melanoma were randomly assigned to 12 months of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib versus placebo. We report updated RFS (primary end point) and distant metastasis-free survival. RFS was also analyzed by subgroups defined by baseline disease stage (American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th and 8th editions), nodal metastatic burden, and ulceration status. The fraction of patients who remained relapse free long term was estimated using a Weibull mixture cure-rate model.

RESULTS

At median follow-up of 44 months (dabrafenib plus trametinib) and 42 months (placebo), 3- and 4-year RFS rates were 59% (95% CI, 55% to 64%) and 54% (95% CI, 49% to 59%) in the dabrafenib plus trametinib arm and 40% (95% CI, 35% to 45%) and 38% (95% CI, 34% to 44%) in the placebo arm, respectively (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.59). Distant metastasis-free survival also favored dabrafenib plus trametinib (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.67). The estimated cure rate was 54% (95% CI, 49% to 59%) in the dabrafenib plus trametinib arm compared with 37% (95% CI, 32% to 42%) in the placebo arm. Subgroup analysis of RFS demonstrated similar treatment benefit regardless of baseline factors, including disease stage, nodal metastatic burden, and ulceration.

CONCLUSION

Longer follow-up confirmed RFS benefit with dabrafenib plus trametinib. Subgroup analysis suggested that dabrafenib plus trametinib benefited patients regardless of baseline factors.

MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic as adjuvant therapy for patients with resected, MAGE-A3-positive, stage III melanoma (DERMA): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Despite newly approved treatments, metastatic melanoma remains a life-threatening condition. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic in patients with stage IIIB or IIIC melanoma in the adjuvant setting.

METHODS

DERMA was a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial done in 31 countries and 263 centres. Eligible patients were 18 years or older and had histologically proven, completely resected, stage IIIB or IIIC, MAGE-A3-positive cutaneous melanoma with macroscopic lymph node involvement and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0 or 1. Randomisation and treatment allocation at the investigator sites were done centrally via the internet. We randomly assigned patients (2:1) to receive up to 13 intramuscular injections of recombinant MAGE-A3 with AS15 immunostimulant (MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic; 300 μg MAGE-A3 antigen plus 420 μg CpG 7909 reconstituted in AS01B to a total volume of 0·5 mL), or placebo, over a 27-month period: five doses at 3-weekly intervals, followed by eight doses at 12-weekly intervals. The co-primary outcomes were disease-free survival in the overall population and in patients with a potentially predictive gene signature (GS-positive) identified previously and validated here via an adaptive signature design. The final analyses included all patients who had received at least one dose of study treatment; analyses for efficacy were in the as-randomised population and for safety were in the as-treated population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00796445.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 1, 2008, and Sept 19, 2011, 3914 patients were screened, 1391 randomly assigned, and 1345 started treatment (n=895 for MAGE-A3 and n=450 for placebo). At final analysis (data cutoff May 23, 2013), median follow-up was 28·0 months [IQR 23·3-35·5] in the MAGE-A3 group and 28·1 months [23·7-36·9] in the placebo group. Median disease-free survival was 11·0 months (95% CI 10·0-11·9) in the MAGE-A3 group and 11·2 months (8·6-14·1) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·01, 0·88-1·17, p=0·86). In the GS-positive population, median disease-free survival was 9·9 months (95% CI 5·7-17·6) in the MAGE-A3 group and 11·6 months (5·6-22·3) in the placebo group (HR 1·11, 0·83-1·49, p=0·48). Within the first 31 days of treatment, adverse events of grade 3 or worse were reported by 126 (14%) of 894 patients in the MAGE-A3 group and 56 (12%) of 450 patients in the placebo group, treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse by 36 (4%) patients given MAGE-A3 vs six (1%) patients given placebo, and at least one serious adverse event by 14% of patients in both groups (129 patients given MAGE-A3 and 64 patients given placebo). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neoplasms (33 [4%] patients in the MAGE-A3 group vs 17 [4%] patients in the placebo group), general disorders and administration site conditions (25 [3%] for MAGE-A3 vs four [<1%] for placebo) and infections and infestations (17 [2%] for MAGE-A3 vs seven [2%] for placebo). No deaths were related to treatment.

INTERPRETATION

An antigen-specific immunotherapeutic alone was not efficacious in this clinical setting. Based on these findings, development of the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic for use in melanoma has been stopped.

FUNDING

GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.

Isolated Pelvic Perfusion for the Treatment of Unresectable Primary or Recurrent Rectal Cancer

Between May 1990 and December 1995, 16 patients with primary or recurrent unresectable rectal cancer were treated by isolated pelvic perfusion. All patients had been previously treated and were considered unsuitable for surgery or further systemic chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The treatment was based on a perfusion lasting 90 min at 40.5 C° with 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin-C and mitoxantrone. Whenever technically feasible (10 cases), continuous intraarterial chemotherapy (through a Medtronic device with a catheter in the inferior mesenteric artery) was administered postoperatively. Two complete responses and 2 partial responses were observed; 8 other patients showed stable disease. One patient did not show any response. Finally, 3 patients for various reasons were not assessable. All patients experienced immediate relief of pain. No major side effects directly related to isolated pelvic perfusion were recorded; a transitory bone marrow depletion was observed in all cases. In conclusion, isolated pelvic perfusion is useful in inoperable disease of the pelvis by reliably relieving pain and thereby improving the patients quality of life.

Micro-Melanoma Detection. A Clinical Study on 22 Cases of Melanoma with a Diameter Equal to or Less than 3 MM

Background and aims

Very small pigmented lesions may represent an extreme diagnostic challenge to the clinician. Our aim was to describe the clinical and dermoscopic features in a series of cutaneous melanomas with a maximum clinical diameter of 3 mm.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of the 924 primary melanomas seen and treated during a period of five years at the Unit for Melanoma Detection of the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, Italy. The size characteristics of the considered lesions allowed the identification of 22 (2.4%) cases of micro-melanoma (clinical diameter of 3 mm or less). Sixteen of these cases were subjected to dermoscopy. The clinical and dermoscopic features as well as the corresponding diagnoses were recorded.

Results

The typical lesion presents as a small, dark, often black macule, generally evenly colored, with well-defined borders; it may be asymmetric or symmetric in shape. These features prompted a correct clinical diagnosis in nearly half of the cases. Dermoscopy lead to a correct diagnosis in all cases subjected to the technique.

Conclusion

Dermoscopy appears to be an efficient aid to the diagnosis of micro-melanomas, provided that clinicians are aware of this type of lesion and maintain the index of suspicion at a high level.

Treatment of Recurrent Sarcoma of the Extremities by Isolated Limb Perfusion Using Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha and Melphalan

Background

24-60% of patients with soft tissue sarcoma shows local recurrences after treatment of the primary tumor. The event is associated with a high incidence of macroscopic or microscopic metastases and a poor survival. Our goal is to preserve a patient's functional limb by treating such cases with isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with recombinant human tumor necrosis factor alpha (rHu TNF-α) and melphalan, which have demonstrated a potent antitumor activity in vivo and in vitro studies.

Methods

During the period November 1991 to November 1995, 10 patients with unresectable recurrent soft tissue sarcoma of the limb were treated by ILP at intermediate hyperthermia (40-40.5 °C) with rHu TNF-α and melphalan. Two patients also received recombinant interferon gamma (rIFN-γ) before and during ILP. We used a range of 2-4 mg for rHu TNF-α and 50-100 mg of melphalan. rIFN-γ was administered on days -2 and -1 (15x106 IU) subcutaneously and the same dose was injected in the arterial line during ILP.

Results

No perioperative surgical complication was observed. Local toxicity was moderate (grade I or II); general toxicity was observed in 6 patients (2 grade I and 4 grade III). Complete response was obtained in 7 cases; 2 patients had a partial response and finally 1 was a nonresponder and showed local progression, which required surgical amputation. Tumor necrosis (observed in 5 cases) was maximal in 4 patients (80-100%) and absent in the patient who had local progression.

Conclusions

The results we obtained with the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma confirm the efficacy of ILP as a limb-sparing methodology for unresectable recurrences. Furthermore, rHu TNF-α and melphalan confirmed their antitumor activity when associated with hyperthermia. Amputation or disarticulation may be reliable as a second-choice treatment for these patients.

Regional Perfusion at High Temperature in Treatment of Stage IIIA-IIIAB Melanoma Patients

The results obtained with isolation perfusions in stage IIIA-IIIAB melanoma patients, performed at 42.5–43 °C for 2.5 h, are reported. These temperatures and perfusion times were chosen on the basis of experimental data in animal models and in vitro. The clinical results were impressive, but the high percentage of complications and the high cost from a social and human point of view make this experience negative with regard to its clinical applicability, at least with such a high temperature and long perfusion time.

HLA Antigens in Familial and Sporadic Cutaneous Melanoma

One hundred and twenty-four subjects belonging to 25 families, 51 with familial malignant melanoma (FMM), and 186 subjects belonging to 41 families, 41 with sporadic malignant melanoma, were typed for the HLA A, B, C and DR loci of the HLA system. There was the same statistically significant difference in the frequency of the haplotype A9, B35, Cw4 between each group of patients and the respective healthy relatives (p = 0.01, p = 0.01 and p = 4 × 10−3, respectively). Moreover, the higher frequency of the haplotype A9, B35, Cw4 in the healthy members of the FMM families (42.46 %) compared with the healthy members of the SMM families (23.44 %) indicates that in the latter group other individuals are at risk for the disease. Furthermore, the different frequency of haplotypes B5, DR5 and B5, Cw1 suggests that differences exist between the two groups of healthy relatives. These observations confirm that the HLA region is involved in the etiology of malignant melanoma.

Hyperthermic Antiblastic Perfusion in the Treatment of Cancer of the Extremities

From February 1982 to December 1983, 42 patients affected by neoplasms of the limbs were treated at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan by hyperthermic antiblastic perfusion in extracorporeal circulation at the temperature of 40-41 °C for 1 h. Thirty-two were affected by melanoma, 4 by osteogenic sarcoma, 2 by squamous-cell carcinoma, 1 by liposarcoma, 1 by hemangiopericytoma, 1 by clear-cell sarcoma and 1 by Kaposis's sarcoma. As regards the immediate response, a complete plus partial remission rate of 88 % without any major complication was obtained. The follow-up period is too short for any considerations about overall survival. However, because of these good clinical results we consider this method able to locally control the evolution of neoplasms of the extremities, allowing in many cases a limb salvage.

Limb-Salvage Procedure in Two Patients with Spindle Cell Carcinoma of the Lower Extremities using Isolation Perfusion

Two patients with extensive squamous cell carcinoma of the lower extremities, candidate for demolitive surgery, were treated by hyperthermic antiblastic perfusion in extracorporeal circulation. The temperature reached was 41 degrees C and the drug used was methotrexate at the dosage of 500 mg. Radical excision of the ulcer was possible in the 2 patients. Both tumors underwent extensive necrosis, and histology done 1 month after perfusion on surgical specimens showed limited areas of residual malignancy. These 2 patients suggest that hyperthermic antiblastic perfusion may be a limb salvage procedure in the multimodal management of extended squamous cell carcinoma of the extremities.

Small Nodular Melanoma: The Beginning of a Life-Threatening Lesion. A Clinical Study on 11 Cases

Aims and background

Because of its high thickness, nodular melanoma often bears a poor prognosis. Thus, an earlier diagnosis of this type of lesion while it is still thin would be an important step in secondary prevention. The principal aim of the present study was to better define the initial clinical features of nodular melanoma to allow an early diagnosis. A secondary aim was to establish the prognosis of this type of lesion.

Methods

We retrospectively studied and illustrated the clinical features of 11 small (≤6 mm maximum diameter) cutaneous nodular melanomas seen and treated during a 10-year period. Prognostic characteristics of the various lesions were also described.

Results

The results of the study help to describe a small nodular melanoma as a dark and/or pink/red raised lesion, which may be evenly or unevenly colored, with well-defined borders, that often appears de novo. A correct clinical diagnosis was made in 7 of the cases. During a median follow-up of 6 years, none of the patients had local or distant relapses.

Conclusions

Detection of small nodular melanoma is feasible by accurate visual inspection, provided that physicians are aware of this type of lesion and maintain the index of suspicion at a high level to bring about curative surgery. Free full text available at www.tumorionline.it

Metamorphosis of melanoma. Trends in size and thickness of cutaneous melanoma over one decade at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan

Aims and background

Messages about the description of the clinical features of cutaneous melanoma (CM) have remained unchanged since 1985, when the ABCD (Asymmetry, Border irregularity, Color variegation, Diameter >6 mm) rule for melanoma detection was formulated. Given the significant shift to the diagnosis of earlier-stage CMs over the past decades, it is reasonable to think that also the clinical aspects of the disease might have changed. The aim of this study was to examine trends in the presentation of CM over the last decade at our Institution, focusing on two characteristics of the disease: size and thickness.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted including 1,603 primary invasive CMs seen and treated at the Unit for Melanoma Detection at our Institute between January 1997 and December 2006.

Results

The results showed a trend towards smaller CMs, with a difference of 3 mm in median size from the beginning to the end of the period. Detection of small (≤6 mm) CMs increased at a rate of about 1.5% per year, with a current ratio of 25% with respect to all CMs. Thickness remained substantially unchanged over time.

Conclusions

Physicians must be aware that the characteristics of melanoma have undergone a metamorphosis over the years and the ABCD signs cannot be relied on for adequate sensitivity to further the early detection of CM.

Adjuvant Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Stage III BRAF-Mutated Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Combination therapy with the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib plus the MEK inhibitor trametinib improved survival in patients with advanced melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations. We sought to determine whether adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib would improve outcomes in patients with resected, stage III melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 870 patients with completely resected, stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations to receive oral dabrafenib at a dose of 150 mg twice daily plus trametinib at a dose of 2 mg once daily (combination therapy, 438 patients) or two matched placebo tablets (432 patients) for 12 months. The primary end point was relapse-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, freedom from relapse, and safety.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 2.8 years, the estimated 3-year rate of relapse-free survival was 58% in the combination-therapy group and 39% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for relapse or death, 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.58; P<0.001). The 3-year overall survival rate was 86% in the combination-therapy group and 77% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for death, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.79; P=0.0006), but this level of improvement did not cross the prespecified interim analysis boundary of P=0.000019. Rates of distant metastasis-free survival and freedom from relapse were also higher in the combination-therapy group than in the placebo group. The safety profile of dabrafenib plus trametinib was consistent with that observed with the combination in patients with metastatic melanoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant use of combination therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib resulted in a significantly lower risk of recurrence in patients with stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations than the adjuvant use of placebo and was not associated with new toxic effects. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis; COMBI-AD ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01682083 ; EudraCT number, 2012-001266-15 .).

Prognostic factors in Merkel cell carcinoma patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy

INTRODUCTION

Debate remains about prognostic factors in primary Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). We investigated clinicopathological factors as determinants of survival in patients with MCC submitted to sentinel node biopsy.

METHODS

Sixty-four consecutive patients treated for a primary MCC were identified from a prospectively maintained database at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan. Time to events outcome were described by product limit estimators and proportional hazards model was used to investigate the association between outcome and potential predictors.

RESULTS

The most common site of primary tumor was lower limbs (56.3%). The size of primary lesion was ≤2 cm in 67.2% of cases. Presence of residual disease after the diagnostic surgical excision was observed in 28% of cases. All patients received sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and a SN positivity was detected in 26.6%. The median follow up was 78 months. Disease recurrence occurred in 17 patients (26.6%). In the SN negative group 10 recurrences occurred (21.3%), whereas 7 (41.2%) were found in SN positive one. Nine patients SN negative (19.1%) died of disease and 3 (17.6%) among SN positive. SN status was not associated with survival (p = 0.78). Neither age, gender, size and site of primary tumor resulted predictors of patients' outcome. The presence of residual tumor in the specimen of the wide local excision, after the diagnostic surgical excision, was the only variable associated with survival (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Presence of residual tumor in the specimen of the wide local excision is the main prognostic factor in MCC patients.