ClonoSEQ assay for the detection of lymphoid malignancies

MRD in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive ALL: Methodologies and Clinical Implications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is integral in the management of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This review discusses the current methods used to evaluate MRD as well as the interpretation, significance, and incorporation of MRD in current practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

New molecular technologies have allowed the detection of MRD to levels as low as 10- 6. The most used techniques to evaluate MRD are multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC), quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS). Each method varies in terms of advantages, disadvantages, and MRD sensitivity. MRD negativity after induction treatment and after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an important prognostic marker that has consistently been shown to be associated with improved outcomes. Blinatumomab, a new targeted therapy for Ph + ALL, demonstrates high efficacy in eradicating MRD and improving patient outcomes. In the relapsed/refractory setting, the use of inotuzumab ozogamicin and tisagenlecleucel has shown promise in eradicating MRD. The presence of MRD has become an important predictive measure in Ph + ALL. Current studies evaluate the use of MRD in treatment decisions, especially in expanding therapeutic options for Ph + ALL, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, targeted antibody therapies, chimeric antigen receptor cell therapy, and HCT.

The clinical applications of immunosequencing

Technological advances in high-throughput sequencing have opened the door for the interrogation of adaptive immune responses at unprecedented scale. It is now possible to determine the sequences of antibodies or T-cell receptors produced by individual B and T cells in a sample. This capability, termed immunosequencing, has transformed the study of both infectious and non-infectious diseases by allowing the tracking of dynamic changes in B and T cell clonal populations over time. This has improved our understanding of the pathology of cancers, autoimmune diseases, and infectious diseases. However, to date there has been only limited clinical adoption of the technology. Advances over the last decade and on the horizon that reduce costs and improve interpretability could enable widespread clinical use. Many clinical applications have been proposed and, while most are still undergoing research and development, some methods relying on immunosequencing data have been implemented, the most widespread of which is the detection of measurable residual disease. Here, we review the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic applications of immunosequencing for both infectious and non-infectious diseases.

Minimal residual disease detection by next-generation sequencing of different immunoglobulin gene rearrangements in pediatric B-ALL

While the prognostic role of immunoglobulin heavy chain locus (IGH) rearrangement in minimal residual disease (MRD) in pediatric B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has been reported, the contribution of light chain loci (IGK/IGL) remains elusive. This study is to evaluate the prognosis of IGH and IGK/IGL rearrangement-based MRD detected by next-generation sequencing in B-ALL at the end of induction (EOI) and end of consolidation (EOC). IGK/IGL rearrangements identify 5.5% of patients without trackable IGH clones. Concordance rates for IGH and IGK/IGL are 79.9% (cutoff 0.01%) at EOI and 81.0% (cutoff 0.0001%) at EOC, respectively. Patients with NGS-MRD < 0.01% at EOI or <0.0001% at EOC present excellent outcome, with 3-year event-free survival rates higher than 95%. IGH-MRD is prognostic at EOI/EOC, while IGK-MRD at EOI/EOC and IGL-MRD at EOI are not. At EOI, NGS identifies 26.2% of higher risk patients whose MRD < 0.01% by flow cytometry. However, analyzing IGK/IGL along with IGH fails to identify additional higher risk patients both at EOI and at EOC. In conclusion, IGH is crucial for MRD monitoring while IGK and IGL have relatively limited value.

Updates on lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma classification and minimal/measurable residual disease analysis

Lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL/LBL), especially certain subtypes, continues to confer morbidity and mortality despite significant therapeutic advances. The pathologic classification of ALL/LBL, especially that of B-ALL, has recently substantially expanded with the identification of several distinct and prognostically important genetic drivers. These discoveries are reflected in both current classification systems, the World Health Organization (WHO) 5th edition and the new International Consensus Classification (ICC). In this article, novel subtypes of B-ALL are reviewed, including DUX4, MEF2D and ZNF384-rearranged B-ALL; the rare pediatric entity B-ALL with TLF3::HLF, now added to the classifications, is discussed; updates to the category of B-ALL with BCR::ABL1-like features (Ph-like B-ALL) are summarized; and emerging genetic subtypes of T-ALL are presented. The second half of the article details current approaches to minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) detection in B-ALL and T-ALL and presents anticipated challenges to current approaches in the burgeoning era of antigen-directed immunotherapy.

Multiparameter flow cytometry and ClonoSEQ correlation to evaluate precursor B-lymphoblastic leukemia measurable residual disease

Measurable residual disease (MRD) detection for precursor B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has become the standard of care. However, the testing methodology has not been standardized. We aim to correlate COG multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and ClonoSEQ techniques to assess the test characteristics, to study abnormal immunophenotype for B-ALL MRD, and to observe B-ALL clonal evolution and the impact of blinatumomab therapy on MFC testing. MFC and molecular reports were retrieved from electronic medical records and data was reviewed. Included in this study were 74 bone marrow samples collected from 31 B-ALL patients at our institution between January 2021 and March 2022. COG MFC and ClonoSEQ results were concordant in 59/74 samples (80%) with positive concordant results in 12 samples (16%) and negative concordant results in 47 samples (64%). Discordant results were seen in 15/74 samples (20%), with 14 samples (19%) showing ClonoSEQ + /MFC- results and only 1 sample (1%) showing MFC + /ClonoSEQ- result. ClonoSEQ + /MFC- cases had MRD values ranging from 1 to 1400 cells/million nucleated cells with 86% of cases showing MRD values of < 100 cells/million nucleated cells. Newly identified dominant sequences were detected using ClonoSEQ in 2/31 patients (6%) during follow-up. All 14 bone marrow samples from 8 patients, who had gone through blinatumomab immunotherapy, were MRD negative by MFC, but 3 cases were MRD positive by ClonoSEQ. Our results show strong correlation between COG MFC and ClonoSEQ (r = 0.96), and both methods are complementary. Clonal evolution may occur, and blinatumomab immunotherapy may impact MFC B-ALL MRD evaluation.

Liquid biopsy in hematological malignancies: current and future applications

The assessment of the cancer mutational profile is crucial for patient management, stratification, and therapeutic decisions. At present, in hematological malignancies with a solid mass, such as lymphomas, tumor genomic profiling is generally performed on the tissue biopsy, but the tumor may harbor genetic lesions that are unique to other anatomical compartments. The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) on the liquid biopsy is an emerging approach that allows genotyping and monitoring of the disease during therapy and follow-up. This review presents the different methods for ctDNA analysis and describes the application of liquid biopsy in different hematological malignancies. In diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), ctDNA analysis on the liquid biopsy recapitulates the mutational profile of the tissue biopsy and can identify mutations otherwise absent on the tissue biopsy. In addition, changes in the ctDNA amount after one or two courses of chemotherapy significantly predict patient outcomes. ctDNA analysis has also been tested in myeloid neoplasms with promising results. In addition to mutational analysis, liquid biopsy also carries potential future applications of ctDNA, including the analysis of ctDNA fragmentation and epigenetic patterns. On these grounds, several clinical trials aiming at incorporating ctDNA analysis for treatment tailoring are currently ongoing in hematological malignancies.

Nanopore sequencing of clonal IGH rearrangements in cell-free DNA as a biomarker for acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Background

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) is the most common pediatric cancer, and patients with relapsed ALL have a poor prognosis. Detection of ALL blasts remaining at the end of treatment, or minimal residual disease (MRD), and spread of ALL into the central nervous system (CNS) have prognostic importance in ALL. Current methods to detect MRD and CNS disease in ALL rely on the presence of ALL blasts in patient samples. Cell-free DNA, or small fragments of DNA released by cancer cells into patient biofluids, has emerged as a robust and sensitive biomarker to assess cancer burden, although cfDNA analysis has not previously been applied to ALL.

Methods

We present a simple and rapid workflow based on NanoporeMinION sequencing of PCR amplified B cell-specific rearrangement of the (IGH) locus in cfDNA from B-ALL patient samples. A cohort of 5 pediatric B-ALL patient samples was chosen for the study based on the MRD and CNS disease status.

Results

Quantitation of IGH-variable sequences in cfDNA allowed us to detect clonal heterogeneity and track the response of individual B-ALL clones throughout treatment. cfDNA was detected in patient biofluids with clinical diagnoses of MRD and CNS disease, and leukemic clones could be detected even when diagnostic cell-count thresholds for MRD were not met. These data suggest that cfDNA assays may be useful in detecting the presence of ALL in the patient, even when blasts are not physically present in the biofluid sample.

Conclusions

The Nanopore IGH detection workflow to monitor cell-free DNA is a simple, rapid, and inexpensive assay that may ultimately serve as a valuable complement to traditional clinical diagnostic approaches for ALL.

Measurable residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: methods and clinical context in adult patients

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is the most powerful independent predictor of risk of relapse and long-term survival in adults and children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). For almost all patients with ALL there is a reliable method to evaluate MRD, which can be done using multi-color flow cytometry, quantitative polymerase chain reaction to detect specific fusion transcripts or immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor gene rearrangements, and high-throughput next-generation sequencing. While next-generation sequencing-based MRD detection has been increasingly utilized in clinical practice due to its high sensitivity, the clinical significance of very low MRD levels (<10-4) is not fully characterized. Several new immunotherapy approaches including blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies have demonstrated efficacy in eradicating MRD in patients with B-ALL. However, new approaches to target MRD in patients with T-ALL remain an unmet need. As our MRD detection assays become more sensitive and expanding novel therapeutics enter clinical development, the future of ALL therapy will increasingly utilize MRD as a criterion to either intensify or modify therapy to prevent relapse or de-escalate therapy to reduce treatment-related morbidity and mortality.

Clinical application of next-generation sequencing-based monitoring of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an emerging technology that can comprehensively assess the diversity of the immune system. We explored the feasibility of NGS in detecting minimal residual disease (MRD) in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) based on immunoglobulin and T cell receptor.

METHODS

Bone marrow samples were collected pre- and post-treatment with pediatric ALL admitted to Shenzhen Children's Hospital from February 1st, 2020 to January 31st, 2021. We analyzed the MRD detected by NGS, multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) and real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR), and analyzed risk factors of positive NGS-MRD at the end of B-ALL induction chemotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of paired 236 bone marrow samples were collected from 64 children with ALL (58 B-ALL and 6 T-ALL). The decrease in the clonal rearrangement frequency of IGH, IGK, and IGL was generally consistent after treatment. Positive MRD was detected in 57.5% (77/134) of B-ALL and 80% (12/15) of T-ALL by NGS after chemotherapy, which was higher than those detected by MFC and RQ-PCR. In B-ALL patients, MRD results detected by NGS were consistent with MFC (r = 0.708, p < 0.001) and RQ-PCR (r = 0.618, p < 0.001). At the end of induction, NGS-MRD of 40.4% B-ALL was > 0.01% and multivariate analysis indicated that ≧2 clonal rearrangement sequences before treatment were an independent factor of negative NGS-MRD.

CONCLUSIONS

NGS is more sensitive than MFC and RQ-PCR for MRD measurement. B-ALL children with ≧2 clonal rearrangements detected by NGS before treatment are difficult to switch to negative MRD after chemotherapy.

Novel Approaches in Molecular Characterization of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

Simple Summary

The unique tumor composition of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), with only a small fraction of malignant Hodgkin and Reed–Sternberg cells within the tumor tissue, has created many challenges to characterize the genetic alterations that drive this lymphoid malignancy. Major advances in sequencing technologies and detailed analysis of circulating tumor DNA in blood samples of patients have provided important contributions to enhance our understanding of the pathogenesis of cHL. In this review, we provide an overview of the recent advances in genotyping the clonal and mutational landscape of cHL. In addition, we discuss different next-generation sequencing applications to characterize tumor tissue and cell-free DNA, which are now available to improve the diagnosis of cHL, and to monitor therapeutic response or disease progression during treatment and follow up of cHL patients.

Abstract

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) represents a B-cell lymphoproliferative disease characterized by clonal immunoglobulin gene rearrangements and recurrent genomic aberrations in the Hodgkin Reed–Sternberg cells in a reactive inflammatory background. Several methods are available for the molecular analysis of cHL on both tissue and cell-free DNA isolated from blood, which can provide detailed information regarding the clonal composition and genetic alterations that drive lymphoma pathogenesis. Clonality testing involving the detection of immunoglobulin and T cell receptor gene rearrangements, together with mutation analysis, represent valuable tools for cHL diagnostics, especially for patients with an atypical histological or clinical presentation reminiscent of a reactive lesion or another lymphoma subtype. In addition, clonality assessment may establish the clonal relationship of composite or subsequent lymphoma presentations within one patient. During the last few decades, more insight has been obtained on the molecular mechanisms that drive cHL development, including recurrently affected signaling pathways (e.g., NF-κB and JAK/STAT) and immune evasion. We provide an overview of the different approaches to characterize the molecular composition of cHL, and the implementation of these next-generation sequencing-based techniques in research and diagnostic settings.

MRD in ALL: Optimization and Innovations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is an important monitoring parameter that can help predict survival outcomes in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Identifying patients with MRD has the potential to decrease the risk of relapse with the initiation of early salvage therapy and to help guide decision making regarding allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. In this review, we discuss MRD in ALL, focusing on advantages and limitations between MRD testing techniques and how to monitor MRD in specific patient populations.

RECENT FINDINGS

MRD has traditionally been measured through bone marrow samples, but more data for evaluation of MRD via peripheral blood is emerging. Current and developmental testing strategies for MRD include multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC), next-generation sequencing (NGS), quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and ClonoSeq. Novel therapies are incorporating MRD as an outcome measure to demonstrate efficacy, including blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, and chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy. Understanding how to incorporate MRD testing into the management of ALL could improve patient outcomes and predict efficacy of new therapy options.

Clinical Value of Measurable Residual Disease in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Measurable (minimal) residual disease (MRD) status in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has largely superseded the importance of traditional risk factors for ALL, such as baseline white blood cell count, cytogenetics, and immunophenotype, and has emerged as the most powerful independent prognostic predictor. The development of sensitive MRD techniques, such as multicolor flow cytometry (MFC), quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and next-generation sequencing (NGS), may further improve risk stratification and expand its impact in therapy. Additionally, the availability of highly effective agents for MRD eradication, such as blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies, enabled the development of frontline regimens capable of eradicating MRD early in the treatment course. While long-term follow-up of this approach is lacking, it has the potential to significantly reduce the need for intensive post-remission treatments, including allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, in a significant proportion of patients with ALL.

Carfilzomib with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone or lenalidomide and dexamethasone plus autologous transplantation or carfilzomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, followed by maintenance with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide or lenalidomide alone for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (FORTE): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Bortezomib-based induction followed by high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m²) and autologous stem-cell transplantation (MEL200-ASCT) and maintenance treatment with lenalidomide alone is the current standard of care for young and fit patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different carfilzomib-based induction and consolidation approaches with or without transplantation and of maintenance treatment with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide versus lenalidomide alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

METHODS

UNITO-MM-01/FORTE was a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial done in 42 Italian academic and community practice centres. We enrolled transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma aged 65 years or younger with a Karnofsky Performance Status of 60% or higher. Patients were stratified according to International Staging System stage (I vs II/III) and age (<60 years vs 60-65 years) and randomly assigned (1:1:1) to KRd plus ASCT (four 28-day induction cycles with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone [KRd], melphalan at 200 mg/m² and autologous stem-cell transplantation [MEL200-ASCT], followed by four 28-day KRd consolidation cycles), KRd12 (12 28-day KRd cycles), or KCd plus ASCT (four 28-day induction cycles with carfilzomib plus cyclophosphamide plus dexamethasone [KCd], MEL200-ASCT, and four 28-day KCd consolidation cycles). Carfilzomib 36 mg/m² was administered intravenously on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16; lenalidomide 25 mg administered orally on days 1-21; cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m² administered orally on days 1, 8, and 15; and dexamethasone 20 mg administered orally or intravenously on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23. Thereafter, patients were stratified according to induction-consolidation treatment and randomly assigned (1:1) to maintenance treatment with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide or lenalidomide alone. Carfilzomib 36 mg/m² was administered intravenously on days 1-2 and 15-16 every 28 days for up to 2 years; lenalidomide 10 mg was administered orally on days 1-21 every 28 days until progression or intolerance in both groups. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with at least a very good partial response after induction with KRd versus KCd and progression-free survival with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide versus lenalidomide alone as maintenance treatment, both assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02203643. Study recruitment is complete, and all patients are in the follow-up or maintenance phases.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 23, 2015, and April 5, 2017, 474 patients were randomly assigned to one of the induction-intensification-consolidation groups (158 to KRd plus ASCT, 157 to KRd12, and 159 to KCd plus ASCT). The median duration of follow-up was 50·9 months (IQR 45·7-55·3) from the first randomisation. 222 (70%) of 315 patients in the KRd group and 84 (53%) of 159 patients in the KCd group had at least a very good partial response after induction (OR 2·14, 95% CI 1·44-3·19, p=0·0002). 356 patients were randomly assigned to maintenance treatment with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide (n=178) or lenalidomide alone (n=178). The median duration of follow-up was 37·3 months (IQR 32·9-41·9) from the second randomisation. 3-year progression-free survival was 75% (95% CI 68-82) with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide versus 65% (58-72) with lenalidomide alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0·64 [95% CI 0·44-0·94], p=0·023). During induction and consolidation, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (21 [13%] of 158 patients in the KRd plus ASCT group vs 15 [10%] of 156 in the KRd12 group vs 18 [11%] of 159 in the KCd plus ASCT group); dermatological toxicity (nine [6%] vs 12 [8%] vs one [1%]); and hepatic toxicity (13 [8%] vs 12 [8%] vs none). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 18 (11%) of 158 patients in the KRd-ASCT group, 29 (19%) of 156 in the KRd12 group, and 17 (11%) of 159 in the KCd plus ASCT group; the most common serious adverse event was pneumonia, in seven (4%) of 158, four (3%) of 156, and five (3%) of 159 patients. Treatment-emergent deaths were reported in two (1%) of 158 patients in the KRd plus ASCT group, two (1%) of 156 in the KRd12 group, and three (2%) of 159 in the KCd plus ASCT group. During maintenance, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (35 [20%] of 173 patients on carfilzomib plus lenalidomide vs 41 [23%] of 177 patients on lenalidomide alone); infections (eight [5%] vs 13 [7%]); and vascular events (12 [7%] vs one [1%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 24 (14%) of 173 patients on carfilzomib plus lenalidomide versus 15 (8%) of 177 on lenalidomide alone; the most common serious adverse event was pneumonia, in six (3%) of 173 versus five (3%) of 177 patients. One patient died of a treatment-emergent adverse event in the carfilzomib plus lenalidomide group.

INTERPRETATION

Our data show that KRd plus ASCT showed superiority in terms of improved responses compared with the other two treatment approaches and support the prospective randomised evaluation of KRd plus ASCT versus standards of care (eg, daratumumab plus bortezomib plus thalidomide plus dexamethasone plus ASCT) in transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma. Carfilzomib plus lenalidomide as maintenance therapy also improved progression-free survival compared with the standard-of-care lenalidomide alone.

FUNDING

Amgen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb.

TRANSLATION

For the Italian translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Detection of clonotypic DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid as a marker of central nervous system invasion in lymphoma

The NGS-MRD assay detected clonotypic DNA in 100% of CSF samples from patients who had lymphoma with parenchymal CNS involvement.

Clonotypic DNA in CSF was present in 36% of newly diagnosed aggressive lymphomas and was associated with a 29% risk of CNS recurrence.

The diagnosis of parenchymal central nervous system (CNS) invasion and prediction of risk for future CNS recurrence are major challenges in the management of aggressive lymphomas, and accurate biomarkers are needed to supplement clinical risk predictors. For this purpose, we studied the results of a next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based assay that detects tumor-derived DNA for clonotypic immunoglobulin gene rearrangements in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with lymphomas. Used as a diagnostic tool, the NGS-minimal residual disease (NGS-MRD) assay detected clonotypic DNA in 100% of CSF samples from 13 patients with known CNS involvement. They included 7 patients with parenchymal brain disease only, whose CSF tested negative by standard cytology and flow cytometry, and 6 historical DNA aliquots collected from patients at a median of 39 months before accession, which had failed to show clonal rearrangements using standard polymerase chain reaction. For risk prognostication, we prospectively collected CSF from 22 patients with newly diagnosed B-cell lymphomas at high clinical risk of CNS recurrence, of whom 8 (36%) had detectable clonotypic DNA in the CSF. Despite intrathecal prophylaxis, a positive assay of CSF was associated with a 29% cumulative risk of CNS recurrence within 12 months of diagnosis, in contrast with a 0% risk among patients with negative CSF (P = .045). These observations suggest that detection of clonotypic DNA can aid in the diagnosis of suspected parenchymal brain recurrence in aggressive lymphoma. Furthermore, the NGS-MRD assay may enhance clinical risk assessment for CNS recurrence among patients with newly diagnosed lymphomas and help select those who may benefit most from novel approaches to CNS-directed prophylaxis.

Assessment of Clonotypic Rearrangements and Minimal Residual Disease in Lymphoid Malignancies: A Large Cancer Center Experience Using clonoSEQ

CONTEXT.—

Measurable (minimal) residual disease (MRD) is an independent prognostic factor for survival outcomes in patients with lymphoid and plasma cell malignancies and has been incorporated into consensus criteria regarding treatment response, strategy, and clinical trial endpoints. clonoSEQ (a next-generation sequencing [NGS]-MRD assay) uses multiplex polymerase chain reaction and NGS to identify clonotypic rearrangements at the immunoglobulin (Ig) H, IgK, IgL, T-cell receptor (TCR)-β, and TCR-γ loci, and translocated B-cell lymphoma 1/IgH and 2/IgH sequences for MRD assessment. Additionally, it can be used to confirm diagnoses of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).

OBJECTIVE.—

To review the technical aspects of our experience using the clonoSEQ Assay in routine clinical practice.

DESIGN.—

In this single-center experience, 390 patients with lymphoid and plasma cell malignancies were assessed with the NGS-MRD Assay at a central laboratory.

RESULTS.—

Median time from arrival of the shipment to initiation of the assay (defined as captured in Adaptive's secure tracking system) was 2.1 hours. Overall, 317 patients had 1 or more samples submitted for sequence identification. Of these, 290 (91.5%) had trackable sequences identified. The median calibration rate of samples by malignancy (where n ≥ 10 samples, excluding CTCL samples) was 88.1%, across a variety of fresh and archived sample sources (177 of 201 samples). TCR-β and/or TCR-γ clonotypes were identified in 40 of 95 samples (42.1%) from 66 patients with suspected CTCL.

CONCLUSIONS.—

This NGS-MRD Assay is a valuable and sensitive tool for monitoring MRD in patients with plasma cell and lymphoid malignancies and assisting in the diagnosis of CTCL.

Perspective: sensitive detection of residual lymphoproliferative disease by NGS and clonal rearrangements-how low can you go?

Malignant lymphoproliferative disorders collectively constitute a large fraction of the hematological cancers, ranging from indolent to highly aggressive neoplasms. Being a diagnostically important hallmark, clonal gene rearrangements of the immunoglobulins enable the detection of residual disease in the clinical course of patients down to a minute fraction of malignant cells. The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has provided unprecedented assay specificity, with a sensitivity matching that of polymerase chain reaction-based measurable residual disease (MRD) detection down to the 10^-6 level. Although reaching 10^-6 to 10^-7 is theoretically feasible, employing a sufficient amount of DNA and sequencing coverage is placed in the perspective of the practical challenges when relying on clinical samples in contrast to controlled serial dilutions. As we discuss, the randomness of subsampling must be taken into account to accommodate the sensitivity threshold-in terms of both the required number of cells and sequencing coverage. As a substantial part of the reviewed studies do not state the depth of coverage or even amount of DNA in some cases, we call for increased transparency to enable critical assessment of the MRD assays for clinical implementation and feasibility.

Applications of next-generation sequencing in hematologic malignancies

In the last decade, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has rapidly progressed from a research method to a core component of standard-of-care clinical testing. In oncology, tumor sequencing provides a critical tool to detect somatic driver mutations that not only characterize disease but also impact therapeutic decision-making. Here, we review the important role of NGS in the evaluation of hematopoietic neoplasms. We discusstechnical and practical considerations relevant in somatic mutation testing, emphasizing issues unique to blood cancers. Then, we describe how NGS data is being used to facilitate diagnosis, inform prognosis, guide therapy selection, and even monitor disease. This broad overview highlights the transformative impacts NGS data provides throughout the clinical course of patients with hematologic malignancies.

The MRD disk: automated minimal residual disease monitoring by highly sensitive centrifugal microfluidic multiplex qPCR

We present a proof-of-principle study on automated, highly sensitive and multiplexed qPCR quantification by centrifugal microfluidics. The MRD disk can be used for standardisation of repetitive, longitudinal assays with high requirements on reproducibility and sensitivity, such as cancer monitoring. In contrast to high-throughput qPCR automation by bulky and expensive robotic workstations we employ a small centrifugal microfluidic instrument, addressing the need of low- to mid-throughput applications. As a potential application we demonstrate automated minimum residual disease (MRD) monitoring of prognostic markers in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). The disk-workflow covers all aspects of clinical gold standard MRD quantification: generation of standard curves, specificity controls, no template controls and quantification of the ALL patient sample. We integrated a highly sensitive, colorimetric 2-plex analysis of MRD targets, as well as a 2-plex analysis of reference genes, both in parallel and in a single LabDisk cartridge. For this purpose, a systematic procedure for crosstalk- and signal-to-noise-optimisation is introduced, providing a guideline for efficient multiplex readout inside microfluidic platforms. The qPCR standard curves (n = 12/12) generated on-disk reach clinically required linearity (R2 = 98.1% to R2 = 99.8%). In three consecutive MRD disk runs with an ALL patient sample containing the two representative MRD targets VH3D3D5JH3 and VkIkde, we observe high accordance between the on-disk quantifications (48 ± 6 copies/reaction and 69 ± 6 copies/reaction) and the expected concentrations (57 copies/reaction for both targets). In comparison to the clinical gold standard of manually pipetted, singleplex assays, the MRD disk yields comparable limit of quantification (1 × 10-4) in n = 6/6 analyses (vs. n = 4/4 in gold standard) and a limit of detection (1 × 10-5) in n = 6/6 analysis (vs. n = 2/4 in gold standard). The automation reduces the risk of manual liquid handling errors, making the MRD disk an attractive solution to assure reproducibility in moderate-throughput, longitudinal gene quantification applications.

Reliable and accurate diagnostics from highly multiplexed sequencing assays

Scalable, inexpensive, and secure testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection is crucial for control of the novel coronavirus pandemic. Recently developed highly multiplexed sequencing assays (HMSAs) that rely on high-throughput sequencing can, in principle, meet these demands, and present promising alternatives to currently used RT-qPCR-based tests. However, reliable analysis, interpretation, and clinical use of HMSAs requires overcoming several computational, statistical and engineering challenges. Using recently acquired experimental data, we present and validate a computational workflow based on kallisto and bustools, that utilizes robust statistical methods and fast, memory efficient algorithms, to quickly, accurately and reliably process high-throughput sequencing data. We show that our workflow is effective at processing data from all recently proposed SARS-CoV-2 sequencing based diagnostic tests, and is generally applicable to any diagnostic HMSA.

Ofatumumab, Etoposide, and Cytarabine Intensive Mobilization Regimen in Patients with High-risk Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

More than one-half of high-risk patients with relapsed/refractory (rr) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapse after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT). In this phase II study, we investigate the long-term outcomes of high-risk patients with rrDLBCL receiving intensive consolidation therapy (ICT) with OVA (ofatumumab, etoposide, and high-dose cytarabine) prior to auto-HCT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The primary endpoints were the ability of OVA to mobilize peripheral stem cells and the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate following OVA. Secondary endpoints included safety, 2-year overall survival (OS), impact of cell of origin (COO), and the prognostic utility of next-generation sequencing minimal residual disease (MRD) testing. We simultaneously retrospectively assessed the outcomes of DLBCL patients who underwent ICT with a similar regimen at our institution.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients received salvage chemotherapy, with a response rate of 25% in patients with germinal center B-cell (GCB)-DLBCL versus 92% in patients with non-GCB-DLBCL (P = .003). Nineteen responding patients underwent ICT with OVA (100% successful stem cell mobilization). The 2-year PFS and OS rate was 47% and 59%, respectively, with no difference based on COO. Similar findings were observed when the study and retrospective cohorts were combined. Neutropenia was the most common toxicity (47%). MRD-negative patients at the completion of salvage had a median OS of not reached versus 3.5 months in MRD-positive patients (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

OVA followed by auto-HCT is effective and safe for high-risk rrDLBCL. Patients with GCB-DLBCL had a lower response to salvage chemotherapy, but no difference in outcomes based on COO was seen after auto-HCT. MRD testing in the relapsed setting was predictive of long-term survival.

SITC cancer immunotherapy resource document: a compass in the land of biomarker discovery

Since the publication of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer's (SITC) original cancer immunotherapy biomarkers resource document, there have been remarkable breakthroughs in cancer immunotherapy, in particular the development and approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors, engineered cellular therapies, and tumor vaccines to unleash antitumor immune activity. The most notable feature of these breakthroughs is the achievement of durable clinical responses in some patients, enabling long-term survival. These durable responses have been noted in tumor types that were not previously considered immunotherapy-sensitive, suggesting that all patients with cancer may have the potential to benefit from immunotherapy. However, a persistent challenge in the field is the fact that only a minority of patients respond to immunotherapy, especially those therapies that rely on endogenous immune activation such as checkpoint inhibitors and vaccination due to the complex and heterogeneous immune escape mechanisms which can develop in each patient. Therefore, the development of robust biomarkers for each immunotherapy strategy, enabling rational patient selection and the design of precise combination therapies, is key for the continued success and improvement of immunotherapy. In this document, we summarize and update established biomarkers, guidelines, and regulatory considerations for clinical immune biomarker development, discuss well-known and novel technologies for biomarker discovery and validation, and provide tools and resources that can be used by the biomarker research community to facilitate the continued development of immuno-oncology and aid in the goal of durable responses in all patients.

Advances in the assessment of minimal residual disease in mantle cell lymphoma

The clinical impact of minimal residual disease detection at early time points or during follow-ups has been shown to accurately predict relapses among patients with lymphomas, mainly in follicular and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. The field of minimal residual disease testing in mantle cell lymphoma is still evolving but has great impact in determining the prognosis. Flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction-based testing are most commonly used methods in practice; however, these methods are not sensitive enough to detect the dynamic changes that underline lymphoma progression. Newer methods using next-generation sequencing, such as ClonoSeq, are being incorporated in clinical trials. Other techniques under evolution include CAPP-seq and anchored multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based methods. This review article aims to provide a comprehensive update on the status of minimal residual disease detection and its prognostic effect in mantle cell patients. The role of circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease detection in lymphomas is also discussed.

Monitoring MRD in ALL: Methodologies, technical aspects and optimal time points for measurement

The accurate determination of minimal or measurable residual disease (MRD) during the early months of therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia is well established as the most important independent prognostic biomarker, predicting response to combination chemotherapy. Stratification based on MRD maximizes treatment effectiveness while minimizing adverse effects. Allele-specific real-time quantitative PCR of clone-defining immunoglobin/T-cell receptor gene rearrangements in the patients' leukemic clones and/or multiparametric flow cytometric tracking of leukemia-associated immunophenotypes are considered standard of care. Following recent advances in high throughput sequencing (HTS; next generation sequencing), much attention has been devoted to the development of HTS-based MRD assays, which can increase sensitivity; theoretically only limited by the number of cells input into the assay. Knowledge of the methods and limitations of each technology, along with awareness of the sensitivity and specificity of MRD at particular treatment time points is important in interpretation of the MRD value. MRD negativity at pre-established protocol-appropriate time points guides continuance with consolidation/maintenance chemotherapy, whereas positivity leads to a change to a biological therapy such as blinatumomab and intensification of therapy to allogeneic stem cell transplant. Positivity after maintenance may herald impending relapse enabling treatment intervention. MRD has been integral to the introduction of novel agents and cellular therapies into clinical trials and standard of care, but the long-term predictive value of MRD on outcome of novel therapies is not yet established. Integration of somatic genetics with MRD may further improve accurate identification of patients with the lowest and highest risk of relapse.

Analytical evaluation of the clonoSEQ Assay for establishing measurable (minimal) residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and multiple myeloma

Background

The clonoSEQ® Assay (Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation, Seattle, USA) identifies and tracks unique disease-associated immunoglobulin (Ig) sequences by next-generation sequencing of IgH, IgK, and IgL rearrangements and IgH-BCL1/2 translocations in malignant B cells. Here, we describe studies to validate the analytical performance of the assay using patient samples and cell lines.

Methods

Sensitivity and specificity were established by defining the limit of detection (LoD), limit of quantitation (LoQ) and limit of blank (LoB) in genomic DNA (gDNA) from 66 patients with multiple myeloma (MM), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and three cell lines. Healthy donor gDNA was used as a diluent to contrive samples with specific DNA masses and malignant-cell frequencies. Precision was validated using a range of samples contrived from patient gDNA, healthy donor gDNA, and 9 cell lines to generate measurable residual disease (MRD) frequencies spanning clinically relevant thresholds. Linearity was determined using samples contrived from cell line gDNA spiked into healthy gDNA to generate 11 MRD frequencies for each DNA input, then confirmed using clinical samples. Quantitation accuracy was assessed by (1) comparing clonoSEQ and multiparametric flow cytometry (mpFC) measurements of ALL and MM cell lines diluted in healthy mononuclear cells, and (2) analyzing precision study data for bias between clonoSEQ MRD results in diluted gDNA and those expected from mpFC based on original, undiluted samples. Repeatability of nucleotide base calls was assessed via the assay’s ability to recover malignant clonotype sequences across several replicates, process features, and MRD levels.

Results

LoD and LoQ were estimated at 1.903 cells and 2.390 malignant cells, respectively. LoB was zero in healthy donor gDNA. Precision ranged from 18% CV (coefficient of variation) at higher DNA inputs to 68% CV near the LoD. Variance component analysis showed MRD results were robust, with expected laboratory process variations contributing ≤3% CV. Linearity and accuracy were demonstrated for each disease across orders of magnitude of clonal frequencies. Nucleotide sequence error rates were extremely low.

Conclusions

These studies validate the analytical performance of the clonoSEQ Assay and demonstrate its potential as a highly sensitive diagnostic tool for selected lymphoid malignancies.

The Utility of Liquid Biopsies in Radiation Oncology

The use of therapeutic radiation is primarily guided by clinicopathologic factors and medical imaging, whereas molecular biomarkers currently play a comparatively minor role in most settings. Liquid biopsies provide a rich source of noninvasive tumor-specific biomarkers and are amenable to repeated and noninvasive assessment. Here, we review the current status of liquid biopsies and their potential impact on the field of radiation oncology. We focus on established and emerging approaches to analyze circulating tumor DNA and circulating tumor cells from peripheral blood. These promising classes of biomarkers could have an outsized impact on cancer management by meaningfully stratifying patients into risk groups, tracking radiation therapy efficacy during and after treatment, and identifying patients with radiosensitive or radioresistant disease. Finally, we highlight opportunities for future investigation including the need for prospective interventional studies employing liquid biopsies to guide the management of radiation therapy-treated patients.

Evaluation and management of measurable residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

With standard chemotherapy regimens for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, approximately 90% of patients achieve complete remission. However, up to half of patients have persistent minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) not recognized by routine microscopy, which constitutes the leading determinant of relapse. Many studies in pediatric and adult populations have demonstrated that achievement of MRD negativity after induction chemotherapy or during consolidation is associated with significantly better long-term outcomes, and MRD status constitutes an independently prognostic marker, often superseding other conventional risk factors. Persistence of MRD after intensive chemotherapy is indicative of treatment refractoriness and warrants alternative therapeutic approaches including allogeneic stem cell transplantation, blinatumomab, or investigational therapies such as inotuzumab ozogamicin or chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Furthermore, the incorporation of novel monoclonal antibodies or potent BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as ponatinib into frontline treatment may have the advantage of achieving higher rates of MRD negativity while minimizing chemotherapy-related toxicities. Many studies are therefore ongoing to determine whether this strategy can improve cure rates without the need for allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Modern treatments and future directions for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients

Over the course of the past decade-plus, the therapy of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma has seen incredible advances in the domains of diagnostic evaluation, active medical therapy, and response evaluation. This manuscript reviews the evaluation and management of newly diagnosed active multiple myeloma, with a focus on major clinical trials and IMWG recommendations. The paper describes a current approach for the initial evaluation and workup for patients with putative active myeloma, with consideration towards potential MRD-directed therapeutic approaches and future clinical trials, and then discusses management with a focus on induction regimens with attention primarily to modern three and four-drug combinations for transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients, and those with organ dysfunction. Finally, this article briefly reviews minimal residual disease directed therapy approaches, primarily in the context of whether eligible patients should be referred for high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue. Maintenance therapy for both transplant eligible and ineligible patients is discussed elsewhere in this issue.

Minimal residual disease and stem cell transplantation outcomes

Risk classification and tailoring of treatment are essential for improving outcome for patients with acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Both patient and leukemia-specific characteristics assessed using morphology, cytogenetics, molecular biology, and multicolor flow cytometry are relevant at diagnosis and during induction, consolidation, and maintenance phases of the treatment. In particular, minimal residual disease (MRD) during therapy has potential as a prognostic factor of outcome, determination of response to therapy, and direction of targeted therapy. MRD can be determined by cell surface markers using multicolor flow cytometry, whereas leukemia-specific translocations and mutations are measured using polymerase chain reaction-based techniques and recently using next-generation sequencing. All these methods of MRD detection have their (dis)advantages, and all need to be standardized, prospectively validated, and improved to be used for uniform clinical decision making and a potential surrogate end point for clinical trials testing novel treatment strategies. Important issues to be solved are time point of MRD measurement and threshold for MRD positivity. MRD is used for stem cell transplantation (SCT) selection in the large subgroup of patients with an intermediate risk profile. Patients who are MRD positive will benefit from allo-SCT. However, MRD-negative patients have a better chance of survival after SCT. Therefore, it is debated whether MRD-positive patients should be extensively treated to become MRD negative before SCT. Either way, accurate monitoring of potential residual or upcoming disease is mandatory. Tailoring therapy according to MRD monitoring may be the most successful way to provide appropriate specifically targeted, personalized treatment.