Adherence and resource use among psoriasis patients treated with biologics

Psoriatic Patient-Reported Outcomes, Adherence, and Satisfaction

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are outcomes evaluated by patients based on their perception of their disease and treatment.

OBJECTIVES

Determine antipsoriatic treatment-related adherence, quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an observational cross-sectional, prospective, and single-center study in which PROs surveys were conducted on adherence (Morisky-Green [MG] test), treatment satisfaction (Spanish Questionnaire of Treatment Satisfaction in Psoriasis [CESTEP]) and QoL (Skindex-29 and DLQI). Additional variables include: PASI, BSA.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Jamovi®2.3.26.

RESULTS

A total of 100 surveys were conducted. Based on the MG questionnaire, we found that 75% (75/100) of patients were adherent vs 94% (94/100) from the dispensation records. Regarding CESTEP, a mean score of 7.4±7.7 (close to maximum satisfaction 0) was obtained, while DLQI yielded a score of 2.6±4.6 (indicating a small effect on QoL), and SKINDEX-29 a score of 14.6±15.4 (68% indicating mild (< 5) or very mild (6-17) impact according to Nijsten et al.). Based on CESTEP a p.Rho Spearman value of 0.338 (p=0.004) was obtained in relation to PASI when the study was conducted with a BSA of 0.255 (p=0.050), DLQI results of 0.508 (p <0.001) and Skindex-29 results of 0.397(p <0.001). At the time of the study, the correlation matrix between DLQI result and PASI was 0.365 (p=0.002) with a BSA of 0.347 (p=0.007). Skindex-29 results with PASI were 0.380 (p=0.001) and with BSA, 0.295 (p=0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on therapy exhibit a good QoL, high adherence and satisfaction with their treatment. A significant correlation was seen among satisfaction, QoL, and PASI-BSA at the time of the study.

Influence of sex on the persistence of different classes of targeted therapies for psoriatic arthritis: a cohort study of 14 778 patients from the French health insurance database (SNDS)

BACKGROUND

Sex differences in phenotype presentation, disease trajectory and treatment response in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have been reported. Nevertheless, whether classes of targeted therapies differentially affect men and women with PsA remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of sex on the long-term persistence of each class of targeted therapies in PsA.

METHODS

This nationwide cohort study involved the administrative healthcare database of the French health insurance scheme linked to the hospital discharge database. We included all adults with PsA who were new users of targeted therapies (not in the year before the index date) during 2015-2021 and studied all treatment lines during the study period. Persistence was defined as the time from treatment initiation to discontinuation and was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison of persistence by sex involved multivariate frailty models with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and prednisone as time-dependant variables.

RESULTS

We included 14 778 patients with PsA who were new users of targeted therapies: 8475 (57%) women (mean age 50±13 years; 15 831 lines), 6303 (43%) men (mean age 51±13 years; 10 488 lines). Overall, 1-year persistence was 52% for women and 62% for men and at 3 years it was 27% and 39%, respectively. After adjustments, persistence was lower for women than men for inhibitors of tumour necrosis factor (TNFi) (adjusted HR (HRa) 1.4, 99% CI 1.3 to 1.5) and interleukin 17 inhibitor (IL17i) (HRa 1.2, 99% CI 1.1 to 1.3) but not IL12/23i (HRa 1.1, 99% CI 0.9 to 1.3), IL23i (HRa 1.1, 99% CI 0.7 to 1.5) or Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) (HRa 1.2, 99% CI 0.9 to 1.6).

CONCLUSION

The treatment persistence was lower for women than men for TNFi and IL17i but not for IL12/23i, IL23i or JAKi.

Psoriasis: Striving for Potential Biomarkers

Psoriasis is a chronic disease that is caused by multiple factors and is identified by itchiness, unpleasant, red, or white scaly patches on the skin, particularly on regularly chafed body regions such as the lateral areas of the limbs. Reports suggest that globally around 2%-3% of the population suffers from psoriasis. In this review, we have discussed the clinical classification of psoriasis and also the ideal characteristics of the biomarkers. An overview regarding the discovery of the biomarker and method for validating the study has been discussed. A growing body of research suggests a link to certain other systemic symptoms such as cardiovascular disorder, metabolic syndrome, and few other comorbidities such as hypertension and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Natural killer (NK) cells are lymphocyte cells that concentrate on the destruction of virally infected and malignant cells; these tend to produce a wide range of inflammatory cytokines, some of which are associated with the etiology of psoriasis. Detailed information on the molecular pathogenesis of psoriasis in which interleukin (IL)-17, IL-23, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and CCL20 play a very significant role in the development of psoriasis. In this review, we have discussed an overview of the recent state of the biomarkers available for the diagnosis and treatment of psoriasis by emphasizing on the available biomarkers such as epigenomic, transcriptomic, glycomic, and metabolomic. The most recent advancements in molecular-targeted therapy utilizing biologics and oral systemic therapy (methotrexate, apremilast) enable to adequately treat the most serious psoriatic symptoms and also the studies have validated the efficacy of biologic therapy such as TNF-α antagonist (infliximab, adalimumab), IL-23 antagonist (guselkumab, risankizumab), and IL-17 antagonist (secukinumab, ixekizumab). Finally, an overview about the technological opportunities as well as various challenges has been discussed.

Long-term persistence of second-line biologics in psoriatic arthritis patients with prior TNF inhibitor exposure: a nationwide cohort study from the French health insurance database (SNDS)

INTRODUCTION

Tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) agents are most often the first-choice biological treatment for patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). When their discontinuation is needed, a switch to another TNFi or to another therapeutic class may be considered. However, data supporting one approach over another are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term persistence of classes of biologics in PsA patients with prior TNFi exposure.

METHODS

This nationwide cohort study involved the administrative healthcare database of the French health insurance scheme linked to the hospital discharge database. We included all adults with PsA starting a second-line biological after discontinuing a TNFi during 2015-2020. Persistence was defined as the time from biological initiation to discontinuation and was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison of persistence by biological class was performed with Poisson regression models with time divided into 6-month intervals.

RESULTS

We included 2975 patients: 1580 (53%) initiating a second TNFi, 426 (14%) an interleukin 12/23 inhibitor (IL-12/23i) and 969 (33%) an IL-17 inhibitor (IL-17i). Overall, 1-year and 3-year persistence rates were 42% and 17%, respectively. After adjustment, persistence was associated with treatment with an IL-17i (adjusted relative risk (RR_a) 0.79, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.87) or IL-12/23i (RR_a 0.69, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.79) vs a TNFi, with no significant difference between IL-12/23 and IL-17 inhibitors (RR_a 0.88, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this real-life study shows low persistence for all biologics at 3 years in PsA patients previously exposed to a TNFi. However, persistence was higher with an IL-17i or IL-12/23i than a TNFi.

A Review of the Clinical Trial Landscape in Psoriasis: An Update for Clinicians

As our understanding of the pathogenesis of psoriasis has evolved over the past two decades, so has the number of treatment options. The introduction of biologic agents targeting specific cytokines in the interleukin (IL)-23/IL-17 pathway has proven successful in promoting skin clearance among patients. However, their use is often limited owing to cost, parenteral administration, and possible reduced efficacy over time. Topical therapies have also seen limited advancement, with agents such as corticosteroids and vitamin D derivatives remaining the mainstay of treatment, despite side effects limiting their long-term use. New therapeutic agents are needed to improve disease management for patients. In this review, we summarize pipeline and recently approved therapies undergoing clinical trials for psoriasis during a 12-month search period (30 June 2021 to 30 June 2022) using ClinicalTrials.gov. New-generation biologics and oral small molecules in phase II or III development were included, and pivotal data identified through various search modalities (PubMed, conference presentations, etc.) evaluating each drug candidate will be discussed. Topical therapies will also be discussed in line with recent US Food and Drug Administration approvals. As new therapies continue to enter the treatment landscape, long-term data and comparative trials will be needed to better understand their place among existing therapeutic agents.

Long-term Persistence of First-line Biologics for Patients With Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis in the French Health Insurance Database

Importance

Treatment options for psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have evolved significantly throughout the era of biologics. Clinical trials are inadequate to assess the relative long-term efficacy of biologics and are often insufficient regarding safety.

Objectives

To assess the long-term persistence of different biologic classes to treat PsO and PsA.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This nationwide cohort study involved the administrative health care database of the French health insurance scheme linked to the hospital discharge database. All adults with PsO and PsA who were new users of biologics (not in the year before the index date) from January 1, 2015, to May 31, 2019, were included and followed up through December 31, 2019. Patients hospitalized for PsA in the PsO cohort and for PsO in the PsA cohort in the year before the index date were excluded. Data were analyzed from June 1 to October 31, 2021.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Persistence was defined as the time from biologic therapy initiation to discontinuation and was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison of persistence by biologic class involved using propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models and adjustment on specific systemic nonbiologics (time-dependent variables).

Results

A total of 16 892 patients with PsO were included in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 48.5 [13.8] years; 9152 men [54.2%] men). Of these, 10 199 patients (60.4%) started therapy with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor; 3982 (23.6%), with an interleukin 12 and interleukin 23 (IL-12/23) inhibitor; and 2711 (16.0%), with an interleukin 17 (IL-17) inhibitor. An additional 6531 patients with PsA (mean [SD] age, 49.1 [12.8] years; 3565 [54.6%] women) were included; of these, 4974 (76.2%) started therapy with a TNF inhibitor; 803 (12.3%), with an IL-12/23 inhibitor; and 754 (11.5%), with an IL-17 inhibitor. Overall 3-year persistence rates were 40.9% and 36.2% for PsO and PsA, respectively. After inverse probability of treatment weighting and adjustment, the IL-17 inhibitor was associated with higher persistence compared with the TNF inhibitor for PsO (weighted hazard ratio [HR], 0.78 [95% CI, 0.73-0.83]) and PsA (weighted HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.58-0.85]) and compared with the IL-12/23 inhibitor for PsA (weighted HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.55-0.87]). No difference between the IL-17 inhibitor and IL-12/23 inhibitor for PsO was noted. The IL-12/23 inhibitor was associated with higher persistence than the TNF inhibitor for PsO (weighted HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.72-0.80]), with no difference observed for PsA.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cohort study suggest that IL-17 inhibitors are associated with higher treatment persistence than the TNF inhibitor for PsO and PsA. Interleukin 17 inhibitors were also associated with higher persistence than the IL-12/23 inhibitor for PsA, with no difference for PsO. However, the persistence rates of all biologics remained globally low at 3 years.

Adherence and Persistence to Biological Drugs for Psoriasis: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Despite the large number of biologics currently available for moderate-to-severe psoriasis, poor adherence and persistence to therapy represent the main issues for both the clinical and economic management of psoriasis. However, the data about adherence and persistence to biologics in psoriasis patients are conflicting. Our aim was to produce summary estimates of adherence and persistence to biologics in adult patients with psoriasis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies, searching two databases (PubMed and Embase). Sixty-two records met the inclusion criteria, and a meta-analysis was conducted on fifty-five studies. Overall, the proportion of adherent and persistent patients to biological therapy was 0.61 (95% confidence interval: 0.48–0.73) and 0.63 (0.57–0.68), respectively. The highest proportions were found for ustekinumab, while the lowest ones were found for etanercept. The proportions of adherence and persistence to biological drugs in psoriasis patients are sub-optimal. Notably, both proportions largely differ between drugs, suggesting that a more rational use of biologics might ensure better management of psoriasis.

Expert Perspectives on Key Parameters that Impact Interpretation of Randomized Clinical Trials in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

The recent advent of numerous clinical trials for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis has led to new and emerging therapeutic options for this chronic inflammatory skin disease. With this rapid development has come a lack of consistency in study designs, trial conduct, and statistical analyses. Healthcare providers are challenged to interpret how variations in study parameters may influence clinical trial results. Based on literature review and our experience as clinical trialists, we compiled a list of 22 key study parameters of contemporary clinical trials in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and ranked the top study parameters that may have a significant effect on efficacy results. The top parameters included study comparators, rules for rescue treatment, washout periods for topical and systemic treatments, inclusion criteria such as disease severity by Eczema Area and Severity Index and/or Investigator Global Assessment scores, and the duration of the screening period. We describe considerations for these key parameters, with a focus on between-parameter interactions and effect on efficacy results. This may serve to inform the interpretation of atopic dermatitis clinical trials and raise the profile of the need to harmonize the clinical trial design.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a skin disease characterized by red, itchy skin that is highly burdensome for patients. Patients with moderate-to-severe disease have large, inflamed skin areas with frequent itching. Recently, the number of clinical trials for drugs that treat moderate-to-severe AD has rapidly increased, with differences in how these trials are designed. There is a need for healthcare providers examining results from different clinical trials to understand how trial design factors might influence study outcomes. In this article, we identify key trial design factors that impact study outcomes, detail how these factors can impact clinical trial results, and explore how these factors interact with one another to affect study outcomes. The five most important design factors, as determined via author surveys, were study comparators (a placebo and/or another drug to which the drug being studied is compared); the rules for the use of rescue treatment (a form of treatment given if an enrolled participant has uncontrolled AD symptoms); washout periods (the time before the trial when previous treatments are stopped to allow them to be cleared from a patient’s system); inclusion criteria (that determine which participants are included); and the length of the screening period (the time when patients are assessed to determine if they qualify for participation). By understanding how these key trial design factors impact on study outcomes, healthcare providers may be equipped to better interpret different AD clinical trials. This work also emphasizes the value of harmonizing the AD clinical trial design.

Adherence to systemic therapy in patients with psoriasis during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multicenter study

Background

Adherence to treatment is important in chronic dermatological diseases. There are limited data regarding the adherence to treatment in patients with psoriasis during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

Aims

We aimed to determine the rates of adherence to systemic treatments in patients with psoriasis and to identify the causes of non‐adherence during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

Methods

We conducted a cross‐sectional multicenter study from May 2021 to August 2021. A questionnaire including items regarding sociodemographic characteristics of the patients, disease‐related characteristics, and treatment‐related characteristics were filled out by the physicians. The Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), Hospital Anxiety, and Depression Scale, and the Dermatology Life Quality Index were calculated. The rate of adherence and non‐adherence to treatment and reasons for non‐adherence to treatment were examined.

Results

A total of 342 patients with psoriasis were included (182 male/160 female) in the study. The mean age of the patients was 45.9 ± 14.2 years. The average duration of psoriasis was 192 ± 134.7 months. While the rate of adherence to treatment was 57.6%, the rate of non‐adherence to treatment was 42.4%. There were no significant differences with respect to adherence to treatment in comparison with oral and injection‐therapy groups. The most frequent reasons for non‐adherence to treatment were inability to go to the hospital (19.2%), concern about the COVID‐19 infection (16.3%), discontinuation of the treatment by the doctor (13.7%), inability to reach the doctor (7.3%), and inability to have access to the medication (7.3%).

Conclusion

Adherence to oral and injection therapies was fairly high among our patients with psoriasis during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Psoriasis severity and duration of medication use had a negative impact on adherence to treatment.

Association Between Biologics Use and Risk of Serious Infection in Patients With Psoriasis

Importance

Biologics and targeted therapies, such as apremilast, are efficient treatments to manage moderate to severe psoriasis. More information about the risk of serious infection is needed for the newest treatment options in a real-world setting.

Objective

To assess the risk of serious infection among biologics and apremilast used to treat psoriasis, with etanercept as the comparator.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This nationwide cohort study from France involved data from the National Health Data System covering approximately 99% of the French population. All adults with psoriasis, defined as receiving at least 2 prescriptions of a topical vitamin D derivative within a 2-year period, registered in the database between January 1, 2008, and May 31, 2019, were eligible. The study population included those who were new users of biologic agents or apremilast (ie, without any prescriptions of a biologic or apremilast during the previous year). Patients with HIV infection or a history of cancer, transplant, or serious infection were excluded. End of follow-up was January 31, 2020.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary end point was a serious infection in a time-to-event analysis using propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models, estimating weighted hazard ratios (wHRs) and 95% CIs.

Results

A total of 44 239 new users of biologic treatment were identified (mean [SD] age, 48.4 [13.8] years; 22 866 [51.7%] men; median follow-up, 12 months [interquartile range, 7-24 months]). A total of 29 618 (66.9%) were prescribed a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor first, 6658 (15.0%) an interleukin (IL) 12/23 inhibitor, 4093 (9.3%) an IL-17 inhibitor, 526 (1.2%) an IL-23 inhibitor, and 3344 (7.6%) apremilast. The total number of serious infections was 1656, and the overall crude incidence rate was 25.0 (95% CI, 23.8-26.2) per 1000 person-years. The most frequent serious infections were gastrointestinal infections (645 patients [38.9%]). After adjusting for time-dependent covariables, risk of serious infections was higher for new users of adalimumab (wHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.07-1.38) or infliximab (wHR, 1.79; 95% CI 1.49-2.16) vs etanercept, whereas ustekinumab was associated with a lower risk of having a serious infection (wHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.94). Risk of serious infections was not increased for new users of IL-17 and the IL-23 inhibitor guselkumab or apremilast vs etanercept. Risk of serious infections was increased with concomitant nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or systemic corticosteroids.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of individuals with moderate to severe psoriasis, risk of serious infections was increased in new users of infliximab and adalimumab vs etanercept, whereas ustekinumab users had lower risk of having a serious infection but not new users of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors or apremilast. Other observational studies are needed to confirm results for the most recent drugs.

Risk of inflammatory bowel disease in patients with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis initiating interleukin 17 inhibitors: a nationwide population-based study using the French national health data system

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether IL17-inhibitors (IL17i) initiation in real life is associated with a higher risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in patients with psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis (PsA/AS).

METHODS

This nationwide cohort study involved the French national health data system database. All adults with PsO and PsA/AS who were new-users of IL17i during 2016-2019 were included. Two non-exposed PsO and PsA/AS population were included: new-users of (1) apremilast and (2) etanercept. End of follow-up was September 30, 2019. The primary end-point was an occurrence of IBD in a time-to-event analysis with propensity score-weighted Cox and Fine-Gray models.

RESULTS

A total of 16,793 IL17i new-users (mean age 48.4±13 years; 46% men); 20,556 apremilast new-users (mean age 52.5±14.6 years; 53% men); and 10,245 etanercept new-users (mean age 46.3±15 years; 44% men) were included. Previous systemic treatements were closer between IL17i and etanercept compared with apremilast. IBD occurred in 132 cases: 72 (0.43%) in IL17i new-users, 11 (0.05%) in apremilast new-users and 49 (0.48%) in etanercept new-users. Most IBD cases occurred after 6 months of exposure (82%, 55% and 76% respectively). After propensity score weighting, the risk of IBD was significantly greater with IL17i than apremilast (HR_w 3.8, 95%CI 2.1-6.8). No difference was observed between IL17i and etanercept new-users (HR_w 0.8, 95%CI 0.5-1.2).

CONCLUSION

Compared with patients initiating etanercept that displayed the same severity of the underlying disease, IL17i new-users did not present a higher risk of IBD. These results need to be confirmed in other large databases.

Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients initiating biologics/apremilast for psoriatic arthritis: a nationwide cohort study

Objective

Several biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) have demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects in PsA. However, their comparative cardiovascular safety profiles remain unknown. We evaluated the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in PsA patients on therapy with different classes of bDMARDs and apremilast.

Methods

This nationwide cohort study involved the administrative healthcare database of the French health insurance scheme linked to the hospital discharge database. All adults with PsA who were new users of bDMARDs/apremilast (neither in the year before the index date) during 2015–19 were included. Patients with previous cardiovascular diseases were excluded. End of follow-up was 31 December 2019. The primary endpoint was an occurrence of MACEs in a time-to-event analysis with propensity score-weighted Cox and Fine–Gray models.

Results

Between 2015 and 2019, we included 9510 bDMARD new users [mean age 48.5 (s.d. 12.7) years; 42% men], including 7289 starting a TNF inhibitor, 1058 an IL-12/23 inhibitor and 1163 an IL-17 inhibitor, with 1885 apremilast new users [mean age 54.0 (s.d. 12.5) years; 44% men]. MACEs occurred in 51 (0.4%) patients. After propensity score weighting, the risk of MACEs was significantly greater with IL-12/23 (weighted hazard ratio 2.0, 95% CI 1.3, 3.0) and IL-17 (weighted hazard ratio 1.9, 95% CI 1.2, 3.0) inhibitors than TNF inhibitors, with no significant increased risk with apremilast (weighted hazard ratio 1.3, 95% CI 0.8, 2.2). Similar results were observed with the Fine–Gray competing risks survival model.

Conclusion

Analysis of a large database revealed a small overall number of MACEs, and the risk of MACEs was greater for PsA new users of IL-12/23 and IL-17 vs TNF inhibitors.

Relationship between serum trough levels and efficacy of brodalumab from a post hoc exploratory analysis of a Japanese study in patients with plaque psoriasis

Previous clinical studies have shown that efficacy and serum brodalumab levels are dose dependent in patients with psoriasis receiving the same dose of brodalumab during the study. This study aimed to investigate the association between dosage, serum levels, and efficacy of brodalumab in Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis with dosage variations during the study. This was a post hoc exploratory analysis of a 108‐week, multicenter, open‐label extension study, which changed into a post‐marketing surveillance study following brodalumab approval in Japan. Eligible patients with plaque psoriasis (n = 129) received brodalumab 140 mg every 4 weeks on Day 1; dosage change at physician’s discretion from 140 mg every 8 weeks to 210 mg every 2 weeks was permitted; patients switched to 210 mg every 2 weeks during the post‐marketing surveillance study. Exploratory endpoints included serum brodalumab levels at Weeks 28 and 108, its association with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score, and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score in patients receiving brodalumab 210 mg every 2 weeks at end of study. Median brodalumab trough levels were significantly higher (P < 0.05) at higher vs. lower dosages at Weeks 28 (n = 126) and 108 (n = 111) except for 140 mg every 2 weeks vs. 210 mg every 2 weeks at Week 108 and higher in patients with lower Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores—significantly different only for Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score 0 vs. >2 at Week 28 (P = 0.0153). Of 100 patients receiving 210 mg every 2 weeks at end of study, 89% had a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score ≤2. In patients with plaque psoriasis, brodalumab efficacy may depend upon sustained serum trough levels and can be restored by using the approved dose.

Special aspects of biologics treatment in psoriasis: management in pregnancy, lactation, surgery, renal impairment, hepatitis and tuberculosis

Background of the article: Biologics are modern immunomodulatory drugs, whose use in the treatment of psoriasis has led to remarkable results in psoriatic patients. The administration of these agents in special population groups, such as patients with chronic infections and renal impairment, as well as perioperative, pregnant or lactating patients, has not been thoroughly addressed, mostly because these patients are excluded from clinical studies. Materials and methods: This report is an updated systematic overview of the use of biologics in the above-mentioned types of patients and was conducted according to the PRISMA Guidelines for systematic reviews. Articles derived from the databases PubMed, EMBASE and SCOPUS, published between 1999 and 2018, were analyzed for the study. Results: Research efforts as well as clinical reporting are necessary in order to provide more insight on the management of these therapeutic dilemmas. Conclusion: The aim of this review, other than providing a summarized update on the clinical knowledge on this special topic, is also to raise awareness for the need to conduct larger systematic studies in order to adequately evaluate the use of biologics in these special patient categories and therefore draw definite conclusions on their safety profile.