Cost-utility analysis of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in the Brazilian national health system

Home nursing and self-administered outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment: a comparison of demographics and outcomes from a large regional hospital in Queensland, Australia

BACKGROUND

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment (OPAT) is a safe and effective therapy used in several settings across Australia. As OPAT services expand their inclusion criteria to include complex patient populations, there is an increased need for selecting appropriate patients to receive either healthcare-administered OPAT (H-OPAT) or self-administered OPAT (S-OPAT).

AIMS

To describe patient demographics, diagnosis, microbiology and outcomes of patients treated by H-OPAT and S-OPAT within the Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Australia.

METHODS

Data on demographics, diagnoses, treatment and outcomes on all patients treated by H-OPAT and S-OPAT from March 2017 to December 2019 were collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-five patients (62.26%) were enrolled in H-OPAT and 100 patients (37.74%) in S-OPAT. S-OPAT patients were significantly younger. H-OPAT patients were more comorbid. Bone and joint infections were the most treated infections and were more likely to be treated by S-OPAT. There was no difference in treatment duration, cure and complication rates between S-OPAT and H-OPAT. Longer duration of therapy was associated with more complications. Treatment failure was associated with infections due to multiple organisms, number of comorbidities and treatment of surgical site, skin and soft tissue infections.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant differences in demographics between H-OPAT and S-OPAT without any difference in outcomes. Overall failure and complication rates were low. Higher rates of treatment failure were predicted by the diagnosis, number of comorbidities and number of organisms treated.

Barriers and facilitators for the implementation and expansion of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a systematic review

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has been expanding in recent years and serves as a viable solution in reducing the shortage of hospital beds. However, the wider implementation of OPAT faces numerous challenges. This review aimed to assess implementation barriers and facilitators of OPAT services. Studies describing barriers and facilitators of the OPAT service were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Proceedings, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and PsycINFO. All types of study designs published in the English language were included. Studies that did not mention any barrier or facilitator, did not differentiate OPAT and inpatient, focused on specific antimicrobials or diseases, and made no distinction between parenteral and other treatments were excluded. Qualitative analysis was performed using the 'best-fit' framework approach and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The review was PROSPERO registered (CRD42023441083). A total of 8761 studies were screened for eligibility and 147 studies were included. Problems in patient selection, lack of awareness, poor communication and co-ordination, lack of support, lack of structured service and inappropriate prescriptions were identified. OPAT provides safe, effective and efficient treatment while maintaining patients' privacy and comfort, resulting in less daily life disruption, and reducing the risk of infection. Satisfaction and preference for OPAT were very high. Initiatives in strengthening OPAT such as antimicrobial stewardship and telemedicine are beneficial. Challenges to and facilitators of OPAT were identified among patients, health professionals, OPAT service providers and healthcare administrators. Understanding them is crucial to designing targeted initiatives for successful OPAT service implementation.

Risk factors for readmission among patients receiving outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a retrospective cohort study

In the Netherlands, home treatment with intravenous antimicrobial therapy is a relatively new concept. Although several studies have shown that outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) can be administered safely, people receiving antimicrobials at home remain at risk for adverse events, including readmission. The aim of our retrospective study was to identify risk factors for readmission in patients discharged with OPAT. Patients who were at least 18 years or older, discharged with OPAT between January 2016-December 2018 were included. Variables that were collected consisted of baseline demographics, complications, readmission within 30 days and treatment failure. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for readmission. A total of 247 patients were included; the most common reason for OPAT was bone and joint infections (17%). Penicillin (37%), cephalosporin (26%) and vancomycin/aminoglycoside (15%) were the most commonly prescribed antimicrobials. Among patients receiving medication subject to therapeutic drug monitoring (i.e. aminoglycosides or vancomycin), 51% (19/37) received weekly therapeutic drug monitoring. Receiving aminoglycosides or vancomycin (adjusted OR 2.05; 95% CI 1.30-3.25, p < 0.05) and infection of prosthetic material (adjusted OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.11-7.65, p < 0.05) were independent risk factors associated with readmission. Although patients receiving medication subject to therapeutic drug monitoring are at higher risk of readmission, only half of the patients discharged with aminoglycosides or vancomycin were monitored according to IDSA guidelines. A specialized team in charge of monitoring patients with OPAT is more likely to increase the rate of monitoring to prevent readmissions and complications.

Characteristics, safety and cost-effectiveness analysis of self-administered outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy via a disposable elastomeric continuous infusion pump at two county hospitals in Houston, Texas, United States

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) is an attractive option for patients who require parenteral antimicrobials as outpatients. Few OPAT studies have assessed the impact of IV antibiotic therapy via elastomeric continuous pumps, with most having been conducted outside the United States and few in county hospitals. The OPAT program in Harris Health system, the county hospital system of Houston, Texas, United States, has implemented a disposable elastomeric continuous infusion pump (eCIP) for self-administered intravenous antibiotics (s-OPAT) since December 2018. Our goal was to describe the clinical characteristics of patients discharged with an eCIP, as well as the safety and cost-effectiveness of this pump.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed patients discharged from Harris Health hospitals between 12/2018 and 02/2021 with s-OPAT via eCIP at home. We extracted various patient characteristics and outcomes related to OPAT.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Among 481 OPAT patients during the study period, 91 patients received s-OPAT via eCIP. A total of 1925 days of s-OPAT were administered at home, with a median duration of 12 days. Eighty-three patients (93.4%) achieved a cure from infection, six patients (6.6%) had side effects, and nine patients (9.9%) experienced 30-day hospital readmission. Twenty-two patients (24.2%) presented to the ED during s-OPAT, with 13 patients (14.3%) presenting with PICC line concerns. We estimated that s-OPAT via eCIP saved $2,360,500 to $3,503,900 compared to inpatient-only therapy.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Our study showed that patients with s-OPAT via eCIP had a high cure rate with a relatively low incidence of side effects and 30-day hospital readmission. ED visits during therapy were relatively high, which indicates the necessity of close patient monitoring via the OPAT program. eCIP appears to be a good option to facilitate an early disposition of patients in county hospitals.

Improving the efficiency and reducing variability in patient flow in an outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy unit of a tertiary care hospital

Outpatient parenteral administration of medications and blood transfusions using an outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) unit has gradually become a standard of care. We report a continuous quality improvement project that was conducted on an OPAT unit of a tertiary care cancer hospital in Lahore, Pakistan. Prior to the initiation of the project, it was identified that 52% of the patient encounters in the OPAT unit were being delayed by a median of 63.5 minutes. A cause-and-effect analysis was performed, using a fishbone diagram, to identify the reasons for the delay in appointments. Based on the findings, several modifications were made to the processes of the OPAT unit including, but not limited to, a computerised physician order entry (CPOE) system module for prescribing, dispensing, reviewing and dispensing medications, changes in the nursing and staffing roster, and assignment of additional duties to the ward clerks. These changes resulted in improvement of waiting time to a median of 24.5 minutes and percentage delay in patient meetings decreased to 18%. Likewise, in 2019, 5,399 (27%) more patient meetings took place compared with 2018, which would have otherwise costed the hospital between 21.28 to 45.85 million Pakistani rupees. The use of continuous quality improvement techniques in the OPAT unit can result in substantial and appropriate changes in the process of patient flow, leading to measurable and significant reductions in the variability of care, and optimisation of service.

Factors associated with successful completion of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy in an area with a high prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria: 30-day hospital admission and mortality rates

Objectives

To identify factors associated with hospital admission and mortality within the first 30 days after enrolment in an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) program, also analysing adequacy of the treatment regimen and clinical outcomes.

Patients and methods

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted between October 2016 and June 2017 in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Variables related to hospital admission and mortality were subjected to bivariate analysis, and those with a P<0.05 were subjected to multivariate analysis as risk factors.

Results

We evaluated 276 patients, of whom 80.5% were ≥60 years of age and 69.9% had more than one comorbidity. Of the patients evaluated, 41.3% had pneumonia and 35.1% had a urinary tract infection. The most common etiological agent, isolated in 18 (31.6%) cases, was Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 13 (72,2%) strains were carbapenem resistant. The OPAT was in accordance with the culture results in 76.6% of the cases and with the institutional protocols in 76.4%. The majority (64.5%) of the patients were not admitted, and a cure or clinical improvement was achieved in 78.6%. Multivariate analysis showed that, within the first 30 days after enrolment, the absence of a physician office visit was a predictor of hospital admission (P<0.001) and mortality (P = 0.006).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the viability of OPAT in elderly patients with pulmonary or urinary tract infections in an area with a high prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria and that a post-discharge physician office visit is protective against hospital admission and mortality.

Disparities in United States hospitalizations for serious infections in patients with and without opioid use disorder: A nationwide observational study

BACKGROUND

Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) who are hospitalized for serious infections requiring prolonged intravenous antibiotics may face barriers to discharge, which could prolong hospital length of stay (LOS) and increase financial burden. We investigated differences in LOS, discharge disposition, and charges between hospitalizations for serious infections in patients with and without OUD.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We utilized the 2016 National Inpatient Sample-a nationally representative database of all discharges from US acute care hospitals. The population of interest was all hospitalizations for infective endocarditis, epidural abscess, septic arthritis, or osteomyelitis. The exposure was OUD, and the primary outcome was LOS until discharge, assessed by using a competing risks analysis to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs). Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of discharge disposition and adjusted differences in hospital charges were also reported. Of 95,470 estimated hospitalizations for serious infections (infective endocarditis, epidural abscess, septic arthritis, and osteomyelitis), the mean age was 49 years and 35% were female. 46% had Medicare (government-based insurance coverage for people age 65+ years), and 70% were non-Hispanic white. After adjustment for potential confounders, OUD was associated with a lower probability of discharge at any given LOS (aHR 0.61; 95% CI 0.59-0.63; p < 0.001). OUD was also associated with lower odds of discharge to home (aOR 0.38; 95% CI 0.33-0.43; p < 0.001) and higher odds of discharge to a post-acute care facility (aOR 1.85; 95% CI 1.57-2.17; p < 0.001) or patient-directed discharge (also referred to as "discharge against medical advice") (aOR 3.47; 95% CI 2.80-4.29; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in average total hospital charges, though daily hospital charges were significantly lower for patients with OUD. Limitations include the potential for unmeasured confounders and the use of billing codes to identify cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that among hospitalizations for some serious infections, those involving patients with OUD were associated with longer LOS, higher odds of discharge to post-acute care facilities or patient-directed discharge, and similar total hospital charges, despite lower daily charges. These findings highlight opportunities to improve care for patients with OUD hospitalized with serious infections, and to reduce the growing associated costs.