1
|
Makharia A, Agarwal A, Srivastava AK, Garg D. Current updates in Restless Legs Syndrome: A pragmatic review. ANNALS OF MOVEMENT DISORDERS 2024; 7:55-77. [DOI: 10.4103/aomd.aomd_48_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/03/2025] Open
Abstract
AbstractRestless legs syndrome (RLS), also called Willis–Ekbom disease (WED), affects approximately 3% of the global population, with higher incidence in Caucasians and women. This review explores the latest advancements in the diagnosis, pathophysiology, and management of RLS, and it highlights the recent changes in diagnostic criteria that improve specificity. The diagnostic spectrum now includes atypical presentations involving the upper limbs and other body parts. The new diagnostic specifiers categorize RLS more effectively into chronic-persistent or intermittent types, and a clinical significance specifier has been introduced to better address the disorder’s effects on daily life. RLS management has shifted toward a balanced approach with non-pharmacological strategies and lifestyle changes, supported by updated pharmacological treatment protocols including iron therapy designed to mitigate risks such as augmentation. Notably, gabapentinoids have emerged as a superior treatment option over dopamine agonists owing to their lower risk of augmentation and superior safety profile. Innovative treatments, such as the FDA-approved tonic motor activation device and new pharmacological agents, serve as alternatives for treating medication-refractory RLS, thereby expanding the therapeutic landscape. Additionally, this review addresses the specific considerations for managing RLS in special groups, including pregnant women, individuals with chronic kidney disease, and patients with comorbid conditions such as Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis. We emphasizes the dynamic nature of RLS research and highlight the critical need for ongoing studies to further elucidate the complex mechanisms underlying RLS, as well as to refine the treatment modalities to enhance patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archita Makharia
- Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ayush Agarwal
- Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Divyani Garg
- Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dormegny-Jeanjean LC, de Billy C, Mainberger O, Weibel S, Schorr B, Obrecht A, Landré L, Berna F, Causin JB, Blanc F, Danila V, Tomsa M, Pfleger G, Meyer C, Humbert I, Javelot H, Meyer G, Bertschy G, Foucher JR. Potential efficacy of dopaminergic antidepressants in treatment resistant anergic-anhedonic depression results of the chronic anergic-anhedonic depression open trial - CADOT. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1194090. [PMID: 37829759 PMCID: PMC10565009 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1194090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Among treatment-resistant depression (TRD), we identified anergic-anhedonic clinical presentations (TRAD) as putatively responsive to pro-dopaminergic strategies. Based on the literature, non-selective monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) and dopamine D2 receptor agonists (D2RAG) were sequentially introduced, frequently under the coverage of a mood stabilizer. This two-step therapeutic strategy will be referred to as the Dopaminergic Antidepressant Therapy Algorithm (DATA). We describe the short and long-term outcomes of TRAD managed according to DATA guidelines. Method Out of 52 outpatients with TRAD treated with DATA in a single expert center, 48 were included in the analysis [severity - QIDS (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology) = 16 ± 3; episode duration = 4.1 ± 2.7 years; Thase and Rush resistance stage = 2.9 ± 0.6; functioning - GAF (Global Assessment of Functioning) = 41 ± 8]. These were followed-up for a median (1st - 3rd quartile) of 4 (1-9) months before being prescribed the first dopaminergic treatment and remitters were followed up 21 (11-33) months after remission. Results At the end of DATA step 1, 25 patients were in remission (QIDS <6; 52% [38-66%]). After DATA step 2, 37 patients were in remission (77% [65-89%]) to whom 5 patients with a QIDS score = 6 could be added (88% [78-97%]). Many of these patients felt subjectively remitted (GAF = 74 ± 10). There was a significant benefit to combining MAOI with D2RAG which was maintained for at least 18 months in 30 patients (79% [62-95%]). Conclusion These results support TRAD sensitivity to pro-dopaminergic interventions. However, some clinical heterogeneities remain in our sample and suggest some improvement in the description of dopamine-sensitive form(s).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ludovic Christophe Dormegny-Jeanjean
- Treatment resistant depression expert center of Alsace (CEDRA), Strasbourg-Rouffach-Erstein-Brumath, Rouffach, France
- Non-Invasive neuroModulation Center of Strasbourg (CEMNIS), University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- CNRS UMR 7357 iCube, neurophysiology, FMTS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Clément de Billy
- Treatment resistant depression expert center of Alsace (CEDRA), Strasbourg-Rouffach-Erstein-Brumath, Rouffach, France
- Non-Invasive neuroModulation Center of Strasbourg (CEMNIS), University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- CNRS UMR 7357 iCube, neurophysiology, FMTS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Olivier Mainberger
- Treatment resistant depression expert center of Alsace (CEDRA), Strasbourg-Rouffach-Erstein-Brumath, Rouffach, France
- Non-Invasive neuroModulation Center of Strasbourg (CEMNIS), University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- CNRS UMR 7357 iCube, neurophysiology, FMTS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Sébastien Weibel
- Treatment resistant depression expert center of Alsace (CEDRA), Strasbourg-Rouffach-Erstein-Brumath, Rouffach, France
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health – University Hospital of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- INSERM UMR 1114, Physiopathology and Cognitive Psychopathology of Schizophrenia, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Benoit Schorr
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health – University Hospital of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- INSERM UMR 1114, Physiopathology and Cognitive Psychopathology of Schizophrenia, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Geriatrics Department and Expert Center for Neurocognitive Disorders, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Alexandre Obrecht
- Treatment resistant depression expert center of Alsace (CEDRA), Strasbourg-Rouffach-Erstein-Brumath, Rouffach, France
- Non-Invasive neuroModulation Center of Strasbourg (CEMNIS), University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Lionel Landré
- CNRS UMR 7357 iCube, neurophysiology, FMTS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Fabrice Berna
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health – University Hospital of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- INSERM UMR 1114, Physiopathology and Cognitive Psychopathology of Schizophrenia, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Causin
- Treatment resistant depression expert center of Alsace (CEDRA), Strasbourg-Rouffach-Erstein-Brumath, Rouffach, France
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health – University Hospital of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- INSERM UMR 1114, Physiopathology and Cognitive Psychopathology of Schizophrenia, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Frederic Blanc
- CNRS UMR 7357 iCube, neurophysiology, FMTS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Geriatrics Department and Expert Center for Neurocognitive Disorders, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Vlad Danila
- Treatment resistant depression expert center of Alsace (CEDRA), Strasbourg-Rouffach-Erstein-Brumath, Rouffach, France
- Department of Psychiatry “Pole 8/9”, Rouffach Psychiatric Hospital, Rouffach, France
| | - Mihaela Tomsa
- Treatment resistant depression expert center of Alsace (CEDRA), Strasbourg-Rouffach-Erstein-Brumath, Rouffach, France
- Department of Psychiatry “Pole 8/9”, Rouffach Psychiatric Hospital, Rouffach, France
| | - Geraldine Pfleger
- Treatment resistant depression expert center of Alsace (CEDRA), Strasbourg-Rouffach-Erstein-Brumath, Rouffach, France
- Department of Integrated Psychiatric Care, Centre Hospitalier d’Erstein, Erstein, France
| | - Camille Meyer
- Treatment resistant depression expert center of Alsace (CEDRA), Strasbourg-Rouffach-Erstein-Brumath, Rouffach, France
- Non-Invasive neuroModulation Center of Strasbourg (CEMNIS), University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health – University Hospital of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Ilia Humbert
- Treatment resistant depression expert center of Alsace (CEDRA), Strasbourg-Rouffach-Erstein-Brumath, Rouffach, France
- Non-Invasive neuroModulation Center of Strasbourg (CEMNIS), University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health – University Hospital of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Hervé Javelot
- Treatment resistant depression expert center of Alsace (CEDRA), Strasbourg-Rouffach-Erstein-Brumath, Rouffach, France
- Expert center in Psychopharmacology, Etablissement public de santé Alsace nord (EPSAN), Bischwiller, France
| | - Guillaume Meyer
- Treatment resistant depression expert center of Alsace (CEDRA), Strasbourg-Rouffach-Erstein-Brumath, Rouffach, France
- Department of Psychopharmacology, Centre Hospitalier d’Erstein, Lingolsheim, France
| | - Gilles Bertschy
- Treatment resistant depression expert center of Alsace (CEDRA), Strasbourg-Rouffach-Erstein-Brumath, Rouffach, France
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health – University Hospital of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- INSERM UMR 1114, Physiopathology and Cognitive Psychopathology of Schizophrenia, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jack Rene Foucher
- Treatment resistant depression expert center of Alsace (CEDRA), Strasbourg-Rouffach-Erstein-Brumath, Rouffach, France
- Non-Invasive neuroModulation Center of Strasbourg (CEMNIS), University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- CNRS UMR 7357 iCube, neurophysiology, FMTS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health – University Hospital of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang M, Zhou W, Zhang Q, Zong S, Lv C. Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of a Single Escalating Dose and Repeated Doses of Rasagiline Transdermal Patch in Healthy Chinese Subjects. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev 2019; 9:602-609. [PMID: 31823527 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
A rasagiline transdermal patch can be used to offer continuous rasagiline to patients with Parkinson's disease who cannot take their usual oral medications. This was the first study to investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of the rasagiline transdermal patch in healthy Chinese subjects. Thirty subjects were randomized to 3 groups with 10 subjects in each group. The 10 subjects of group 1 received a single 1-mg dose of rasagiline as a tablet; the 20 subjects of groups 2 and 3 received a single transdermal patch (48-hour patch-on period) containing 1.25 mg and 2.5 mg rasagiline, respectively. After a 2-week washout period, the subjects of group 1 were assigned to receive 1 mg of rasagiline tablets every 24 hours for 7 days, and the subjects of group 2 were assigned to receive 1.25-mg rasagiline transdermal patches (48-hour patch-on period) every 72 hours for 5 time periods. The absorption of rasagiline from the transdermal patch was significantly improved, although the peak plasma concentration was obviously reduced. There was slight accumulation of rasagiline dose after multiple administrations. Inhibition of platelet monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) activity was dose dependent. The 80% inhibition maintained for at least 48 hours after multiple-dose administration of 1 mg tablets, and for 72 hours after multiple-dose administration of 1.25 mg/48 h patch. Compared with rasagiline tablets, the transdermal patch had a prolonged duration of 80% inhibition and increased maximal inhibition of MAO-B activity. These characteristics permitted an interval of 3 days of dosing, which was convenient for patients to use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng Wang
- Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Wenjia Zhou
- Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Quanying Zhang
- Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Shunlin Zong
- Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Chengzhe Lv
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|