1
|
Ilgaz Aydinlar E, Erdogan Soyukibar T, Yalinay Dikmen P. The effectiveness and predictors influencing the outcome of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in chronic migraine: understanding from diverse patient profiles in a single session. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1417303. [PMID: 38962481 PMCID: PMC11219632 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1417303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective This real-world study aimed to investigate how onabotulinumtoxinA affects the outcome of migraine, along with accompanying anxiety, depression, and bruxism among a group of patients with chronic migraine (CM) and define predictors of good response. Methods Patients diagnosed with CM who received onabotulinumtoxinA were included in this single-center, real-world retrospective cohort study. Monthly headache days (MHDs), monthly migraine days (MMDs), headache intensity (numeric rating scale-NRS) and headache characteristics were evaluated at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) scores, 12-item Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC-12), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Response to onabotulinumtoxinA (% reduction in MHDs) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were also evaluated. OnabotulinumA was applied to the masseter muscles in patients complaining of bruxism. Results A total of 72 patients (mean ± SD age: 36.3 ± 8.5 years; 91.7% were female) diagnosed with CM were included. OnabotulinumtoxinA revealed significant decrease in median (IQR) MHDs [from 20(15-25) at baseline to 6(4-10), p < 0.001], MMDs [from 9(6-12) to 3(1-6), p < 0.001] and NRS [from 9(8-10) to 7(6-8), p < 0.001], and the MIDAS [from 54(30-81) to 16(7-24), p < 0.001], HIT-6 [from 67(65-69) to 58(54-64), p < 0.001], ASC-12 [from 6(1.5-9) to 2(0-9), p = 0.002], BAI [from 12(6.5-19) to 9(3-17), p < 0.001] and BDI [from 11(6.5-17) to 3(2-7) p < 0.001] scores at 12 weeks post-treatment. Patients complaining of bruxism received onabotulinumtoxinA injections in the first n = 27 (37.5%) and 12. week post-treatment n = 19 (70.4%) periods. Overall, 70.8% of patients responded (≥50% reduction in MHDs), while 29.2% did not (<50% reduction). Both groups showed similar characteristics in demographics, migraine history, baseline PROMs scores, comorbidities, and prior treatments. Conclusion OnabotulinumtoxinA is an effective treatment option that rapidly improves migraine outcomes, disability, and impact while also alleviating comorbid depression and/or anxiety. This study's noteworthy finding is that onabotulinumtoxinA is effective in a majority of CM patients, irrespective of their prior treatment history, migraine characteristics, or concurrent comorbidities. Furthermore, we identified no specific predictors for a favorable response to onabotulinumtoxinA. Applying onabotulinumtoxinA to the masseter muscles can relieve discomfort associated with concurrent bruxism; however, it does not impact migraine outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elif Ilgaz Aydinlar
- Department of Neurology, Acıbadem University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Silvestro M, Orologio I, Siciliano M, Trojsi F, Tessitore A, Tedeschi G, Russo A. Emerging drugs for the preventive treatment of migraine: a review of CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants trials. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2023. [PMID: 37185047 DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2023.2207819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine is a leading cause of years lived with disability and preventive strategies represent a mainstay to reduce health-related disability and improve quality of life of migraine patients. Until a few years ago, migraine prevention was based on drugs developed for other clinical indications and relocated in the migraine therapeutic armamentarium, characterized by unfavourable tolerability profiles. The advent of monoclonal antibodies against Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) and gepants, CGRP receptor antagonists, has been a turning point in migraine prevention owing to advantageous efficacy, safety and tolerability profiles.Nevertheless, while in an ideal scenario a drug characterized by significant greater efficacy and tolerability compared to existing therapeutic strategies should be adopted as a first-line treatment, cost-effectiveness analyses available for monoclonal antibodies against CGRP pathway tend to limit their administration to more severe migraine phenotypes. AREAS COVERED The present narrative review aim to provide a critical appraisal of phase II and III CGRP-mAbs and gepants trials to analyse their use in clinical practice. EXPERT OPINION Despite monoclonal antibodies against CGRP pathway and gepants can be undoubtedly considered top-of-the-range treatments, there are still issues deserving to be addressed in the coming years as the risk of off-target effects as well as their economic sustainability based on the considerable migraine burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Silvestro
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy
| | - Ilaria Orologio
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy
| | - Mattia Siciliano
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy
| | - Francesca Trojsi
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy
| | - Alessandro Tessitore
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy
| | - Gioacchino Tedeschi
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Torrente A, Pilati L, Di Marco S, Maccora S, Alonge P, Vassallo L, Lupica A, Coppola S, Camarda C, Bolognini N, Brighina F. OnabotulinumtoxinA Modulates Visual Cortical Excitability in Chronic Migraine: Effects of 12-Week Treatment. Toxins (Basel) 2022; 15:23. [PMID: 36668843 PMCID: PMC9860741 DOI: 10.3390/toxins15010023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic migraine is a burdensome disease presenting with episodic pain and several symptoms that may persist even among headache attacks. Multisensory integration is modified in migraine, as assessed by the level of the perception of sound-induced flash illusions, a simple paradigm reflecting changes in cortical excitability which reveals to be altered in migraineurs. OnabotulinumtoxinA is an effective preventive therapy for chronic migraineurs, reducing peripheral and central sensitization, and may influence cortical excitability. Patients affected by chronic migraine who started onabotulinumtoxinA preventive therapy were included. Clinical effects (headache diaries and migraine related questionnaires) were assessed at the beginning of the therapy and after 12 weeks. Contextually, patients underwent the evaluation of multisensory perception by means of the sound-induced flash illusions. OnabotulinumtoxinA showed effectiveness both in migraine prevention and in reducing headache burden. Even one session of therapy was able to restore, at least partially, multisensory processing, as shown by patients' susceptibility to the sound-induced flash illusion. OnabotulinumtoxinA could influence migraineurs cortical excitability concurrently to the beneficial effects in headache prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Torrente
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Laura Pilati
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
- Headache Center “Casa della Salute Cittadella San Rocco”, AUSL Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Salvatore Di Marco
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
- Headache Center “Casa della Salute Cittadella San Rocco”, AUSL Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Simona Maccora
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
- Neurology Unit, ARNAS Civico di Cristina and Benfratelli Hospitals, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Paolo Alonge
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Lavinia Vassallo
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Antonino Lupica
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Serena Coppola
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Cecilia Camarda
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Nadia Bolognini
- Department of Psychology & Milan Center for Neuroscience—NeuroMi, University of Milano Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy
- Laboratory of Neuropsychology, IRCSS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20122 Milano, Italy
| | - Filippo Brighina
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Efficacy of Onabotulinum Toxin A on Obsessive–Compulsive Traits in a Population of Chronic Migraine Patients. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12111563. [DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12111563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Drug addiction may play an important role in chronic migraine (CM) with medication-overuse headache (MOH). Psychiatric diseases are associated with CM, but data regarding obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) are lacking. We aimed to establish the prevalence of OCD traits in CM patients with MOH and the impact on onabotulinum toxin A (OBT-A) treatment. Methods: A total of 75 patients with CM and MOH undergoing treatment with OBT-A in our Headache Centre were evaluated. At baseline and after four injection sessions, we assessed the migraine burden and the presence of OCD traits with the Obsessive–Compulsive Inventory—Revised (OCI-R) test. Results: At baseline, 28% of patients had OCI-R scores compatible with borderline OCD aspects, while 22.7% were pathological. An improvement in headache was significantly associated with an increase in the number of subjects with a normal OCI-R score at T0 and T1, whereas patients with a pathological OCI-R score at T0 showed a significantly higher prevalence of CM at T1. Conclusions: Our data showed a significant rate of OCD traits at baseline, which could strengthen the hypothesis of an addictive disorder underlying CM with MOH. OCD traits seem to influence the OBT-A response. An OCD assessment could be useful in improving patients’ selections before starting treatments.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bentivegna E, Luciani M, Ferrari V, Galastri S, Baldari F, Scarso F, Lamberti PA, Martelletti P. Recently approved and emerging drug options for migraine prophylaxis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23:1325-1335. [PMID: 35850597 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2102420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION : Migraine occupies the first position regarding to the disability caused in female working population (15-49 years). Research in the field of prophylaxis of this pathology has made enormous strides in recent years. AREAS COVERED In this narrative review we retrace the most important scientific evidence regarding recently approved and emerging drug for prophylactic treatment of migraine. The purpose of this article is in fact to evaluate currently approved or emerging pharmacological agents for migraine prophylaxis. This review is based on literature published in peer review journal obtained through PubMed, Cochrane library, Clinicaltrials.gov and US FDA. EXPERT OPINION : Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that target the calcitonin gene-related peptide signalling pathway (CGRP) have marked an innovation in prophylactic migraine therapy. The combination of Onabotulinumtoxin-A (OBTA) and mAbs appears to be an effective, but costly, therapeutic option for resistant cases. New classes of molecules like gepants and ditans seem to give exceptional results. In addition, new prophylactic drugs are emerging with several targets: the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), ion channels, several receptors coupled to G proteins, orexin, and glutamate. All these therapies will implement and improve migraine management, as well as personalized medicine for each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Bentivegna
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Valeria Ferrari
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Galastri
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Baldari
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Scarso
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Piera A Lamberti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.,Regional Referral Headache Centre, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wilderman I, Tallarigo D, Pugacheva-Zingerman O. A Qualitative Study to Explore Patient Perspectives of Prophylactic Treatment with OnabotulinumtoxinA for Chronic Migraine. Pain Ther 2021; 10:1523-1536. [PMID: 34523107 PMCID: PMC8586057 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-021-00316-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION OnabotulinumtoxinA (OBT-A) is one of the most studied prophylactic treatments for chronic migraine. Large clinical trials, and now real-world studies, continue to provide evidence to support the use of OBT-A as an effective treatment to manage chronic migraine. The objective of this study was to explore patient experience and perception of prophylactic treatment with OBT-A for chronic migraine. METHODS Data were collected using semi-structured interviews using open-ended questions to uncover rich descriptive data on patient experiences. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using NVivo data analysis software to code and identify themes across the dataset. Three patient groups were included in the analysis: (1) patients who were receiving continued OBT-A treatment; (2) patients who discontinued OBT-A treatment; (3) patients who were recommended for OBT-A treatment but did not proceed. RESULTS For patients who received at least one OBT-A treatment, four main themes emerged, which described patients' expectations, experiences, and feelings towards their treatment decisions. Two main themes emerged that were common to patients, who had discontinued their treatment and those, who were recommended for OBT-A treatment but did not proceed, which were identified as potential barriers to initiate or continue prophylactic treatment with OBT-A. CONCLUSION Understanding patients' perspective is an important part of clinical practice and may impact on decision-making. Qualitative data can provide a more holistic view of patient care and treatment insights that may not be evaluated during a clinical trial. This study revealed potential barriers to treatment that can inform future policy and practice.
Collapse
|
7
|
Yang CP, Zeng BY, Chang CM, Shih PH, Yang CC, Tseng PT, Wang SJ. Comparative Effectiveness and Tolerability of the Pharmacology of Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting the Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide and Its Receptor for the Prevention of Chronic Migraine: a Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Neurotherapeutics 2021; 18:2639-2650. [PMID: 34580838 PMCID: PMC8804075 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-021-01128-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) acting on the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or on its receptor are new therapeutic biologics to prevent chronic migraine (CM). Four mAbs acting on the CGRP or on its receptor are new therapeutic biologics to prevent CM. The aim of current network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and acceptability of CGRP mAbs with onabotulinumtoxinA or topiramate for CM. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining CGRP mAbs and onabotulinumtoxinA or topiramate in patients with CM. All network meta-analytic procedures were conducted using the frequentist model. The primary outcomes were changes in the monthly migraine days and the 50% response rate. The safety was evaluated with acceptability (i.e., drop-out rate) and rate of any adverse event. This NMA of thirteen RCTs, which, in total, consisted of 5634 participants, demonstrated that a single 300 mg of eptinezumab (mean difference = - 2.60 days, 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) = - 4.43 to - 0.77 compared with placebo) demonstrated the best improvement in monthly migraine days among all interventions. In addition, 675 mg fremanezumab in the first month followed by 225 mg in the second and third months (odds ratio (OR) = 2.96, 95% CIs = 2.20 to 3.97 compared to placebo) was associated with the best response rate among all the interventions. Monthly 140 mg erenumab (MD = - 2.50 days, 95% CIs = - 3.83 to - 1.17 compared with placebo) was the best choice for reducing the number of acute migraine-specific medication use days. The safety analysis revealed that loading dose of 240 mg galcanezumab and monthly 240 mg (OR = 0.43, 95% CIs = 0.22 to 0.84) was associated with the lowest drop-out rate; loading dose fremanezumab 675 mg and monthly 675 mg (OR = 1.44, 95% CIs = 1.10 to 1.89), loading dose of 240 mg galcanezumab and monthly 120 mg (OR = 1.37, 95% CIs = 1.02 to 1.84), and single dose of fremanezumab 675 mg (OR = 1.35, 95% CIs = 1.00 to 1.83) were associated with significantly higher rates of AEs than the placebo/control groups. Our NMA indicated that all four CGRP mAbs demonstrated excellent safety, acceptability, and efficacy profiles compared to the traditional prophylaxis for CM. However, because there are several limitations, the findings of the current NMA should be taken into consideration with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Pai Yang
- Department of Neurology, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Nutrition, Hungkuang University , Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Yan Zeng
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Dachang Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Mao Chang
- Center for Traditional Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine , National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Traditional Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Po-Hsuan Shih
- Institute of Traditional Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Chinese Medicine, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Chia Yang
- Department of Healthcare Administration, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ping-Tao Tseng
- Prospect Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology & Neurology, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
- Department of Psychology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| | - Shuu-Jiun Wang
- Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine , National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Trigo-López J, Guerrero-Peral ÁL, Sierra Á, Martínez-Pías E, Gutiérrez-Sánchez M, Huzzey E, García-Azorín D. Patients and general practitioners assessment of the main outcomes employed in the acute and preventive treatment of migraine: a cross sectional study. BMC Neurol 2021; 21:279. [PMID: 34261459 PMCID: PMC8281698 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-021-02220-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We aim to describe and compare patients and general practitioners’ opinions about the different variables related to acute and preventive treatment for migraine. Patients and methods An observational descriptive study was performed. Patients with episodic migraine and general practitioners, from our healthcare area, were invited to answer a survey about the different variables related to migraine treatment. They were asked for their opinions on the different variables, and to consider the desired efficacy in percentage terms and the desired action times of treatment. Results Fifty-five patients and fifty-five general practitioners were selected. Effectiveness was considered the most important variable for symptomatic and preventive treatment. Cost was considered the least important variable. Patients desired percentage of efficacy was 84.0% (±16.7%) for symptomatic treatment and 79.9% (±17.1%) for preventive treatment. General practitioners desired percentage of efficacy was 75.0% (±14.0) for symptomatic treatment and 70.4% (±14.3) for preventive treatment. For symptomatic treatment the desired action time for pain cessation was selected as 27.5 min (±13.8) for patients and 24.0 min (±18.3) for GPs. For preventive treatment the desired action time for effect was 7.1 days (±4.5) for patients and 13.9 days (±8.9) for general practitioners. Conclusion The most important endpoints were, for acute: effectiveness, a short action time and a persistent effect. For prophylactic: effectiveness, sustained effect and tolerability. Both patients and general practitioners agreed on the most and least preferred endpoints. Desired percentage of efficacy was above 75% for both symptomatic and preventive treatment; and the desired action time was below 30 min for acute treatment and 2 weeks for preventive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Trigo-López
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Avenida Ramón y Cajal 3, 47005, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Ángel Luis Guerrero-Peral
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Avenida Ramón y Cajal 3, 47005, Valladolid, Spain. .,Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain. .,Department of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
| | - Álvaro Sierra
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Avenida Ramón y Cajal 3, 47005, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Enrique Martínez-Pías
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Avenida Ramón y Cajal 3, 47005, Valladolid, Spain
| | - María Gutiérrez-Sánchez
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Avenida Ramón y Cajal 3, 47005, Valladolid, Spain
| | | | - David García-Azorín
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Avenida Ramón y Cajal 3, 47005, Valladolid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lu J, Zhang Q, Guo X, Liu W, Xu C, Hu X, Ni J, Lu H, Zhao H. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody Versus Botulinum Toxin for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Evidence From Indirect Treatment Comparison. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:631204. [PMID: 34012392 PMCID: PMC8126691 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.631204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The previously approved botulinum toxin and nowadays promising calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody have shown efficacy for preventing chronic migraine (CM). However, there is no direct evidence for their relative effectiveness and safety. In this study, we conducted an indirect treatment comparison to compare the efficacy and safety of CGRP monoclonal antibody with botulinum toxin for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. Methods: Up to August 31, 2020, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central). Weighted mean difference (WMD) and relative risk (RR) were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Indirect treatment comparison (ITC) software was used to conduct indirect treatment comparison. Results: Ten studies were pooled with 6,325 patients in our meta-analysis. Both botulinum toxin and CGRP monoclonal antibody demonstrated favorable efficacy in the change of migraine days, headache days, HIT-6 score, and 50% migraine responder rate compared with placebo. In indirect treatment comparison, CGRP monoclonal antibody was superior to botulinum toxin in the frequency of acute analgesics intake (WMD = −1.31, 95% CI: −3.394 to 0.774, p = 0.02113), the rate of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (RR = 0.664, 95% CI: 0.469 to 0.939, p = 0.04047), and the rate of treatment-related serious adverse events (RR = 0.505, 95% CI: 0.005 to 46.98, p < 0.001). Conclusion: For chronic migraine patients, CGRP monoclonal antibody was slightly better than botulinum toxin in terms of efficacy and safety. In the future, head-to-head trials would be better to evaluate the efficacy and safety between different medications in the prevention of chronic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiajie Lu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Quanquan Zhang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Xiaoning Guo
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Chunyang Xu
- Department of Neurology, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Kunshan, Kunshan, China
| | - Xiaowei Hu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Jianqiang Ni
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Haifeng Lu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Hongru Zhao
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Baraldi C, Ornello R, Favoni V, Sacco S, Caponnetto V, Pierangeli G, Pani L, Cevoli S, Guerzoni S. Chronic Migraine and Medication Overuse Headache Worsening After OnabotulinumtoxinA Withdrawn Due to the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 Pandemic. Front Neurol 2021; 12:647995. [PMID: 33935945 PMCID: PMC8082239 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.647995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: OnabotulinumtoxinA (BT-A) is a preventive treatment for chronic migraine (CM), which needs to be administered regularly by a trained clinician every 3 months. The spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 pandemic has forced many patients to momentarily stop the scheduled BT-A injections. The goal of this study was to explore whether those patients experienced a worsening of their CM and, if any, the clinical predictors of migraine worsening after BT-A withdrawal. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter study. Patients' clinical data were obtained from their clinical documentation stored at each center. In particular, the following variables were collected: the mean number of headache days in the last month (NHD), the average number of painkillers taken in the last month (AC), the average number of days in which patients took, at least, one painkiller in the last month (NDM), the average intensity of migraine using the numeric rating scale (NRS) score in the last month, and the average score obtained at the six-item Headache Impact Test. The variables mentioned earlier were compared before and after BT-A withdrawal. Results: After BT-A suspension, there was a significant increase in the NHD (P = 0.0313, Kruskal–Wallis rank test), AC (P = 0.0421, Kruskal–Wallis rank test), NDM (P = 0.0394, paired t-test), NRS score (P = 0.0069, Kruskal–Wallis rank test), and six-item Headache Impact Test score (P = 0.0372, Kruskal–Wallis rank test). Patients who were not assuming other preventive treatments other than BT-A displayed similar results. Patients who experienced a >30% worsening in NHD after BT-A was withdrawn displayed a longer CM history (P = 0.001, Kruskal–Wallis rank test), a longer MOH duration (P = 0.0017, Kruskal–Wallis rank test), a higher AC value at the baseline (P = 0.0149, Kruskal–Wallis rank test), a higher NDM (P = 0.0024, t-test), and a higher average value of the NRS score (P = 0.0073, Kruskal–Wallis rank test). Conclusion: BT-A withdrawn during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 pandemic was associated with a general worsening in patients suffering from CM, hence the need to continue BT-A injection to avoid patients' worsening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Baraldi
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, PhD School in Neurosciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Raffaele Ornello
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Valentina Favoni
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Valeria Caponnetto
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Giulia Pierangeli
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Pani
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Medical Toxicology-Headache and Drug Abuse Research Center, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.,Pharmacology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.,VeraSci, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simona Guerzoni
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Medical Toxicology-Headache and Drug Abuse Research Center, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ornello R, Ahmed F, Negro A, Miscio AM, Santoro A, Alpuente A, Russo A, Silvestro M, Cevoli S, Brunelli N, Vernieri F, Grazzi L, Baraldi C, Guerzoni S, Andreou AP, Lambru G, Frattale I, Kamm K, Ruscheweyh R, Russo M, Torelli P, Filatova E, Latysheva N, Gryglas-Dworak A, Straburzynski M, Butera C, Colombo B, Filippi M, Pozo-Rosich P, Martelletti P, Sacco S. Early Management of OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment in Chronic Migraine: Insights from a Real-Life European Multicenter Study. Pain Ther 2021; 10:637-650. [PMID: 33778933 PMCID: PMC8119503 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-021-00253-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction OnabotulinumtoxinA (BT-A) quarterly was the first treatment approved specifically for chronic migraine (CM). It is unclear whether three cycles are better than two to assess early BT-A response. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis on real-life prospectively collected data in 16 European headache centers. All the centers provided data on patients treated with BT-A for CM over the first three cycles of treatment. For each treatment cycle we defined patients as “good responders” if reporting a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly headache days compared with the three months before starting BT-A, “partial responders” if reporting a 30–49% reduction in monthly headache days, and “non-responders” if reporting a < 30% reduction in monthly headache days or stopping the treatment before the third cycle. Results We included 2879 patients. Seven hundred and eighty-four (64.6%) of the 1213 patients reporting a good response during the first and/or the second cycle had a good response during the third cycle; 309 (49.3%) of the 627 patients reporting a partial response (but no good response) during the first and/or the second cycle had a good response during the third cycle; only 65 (6.3%) of the 1039 patients who did not respond during both the first two cycles achieved a good response during the third cycle. Multivariate analyses showed that partial or good response during the first or the second cycle were independently associated with good response during the third cycle. Conclusions Our data suggest that patients with CM responding to BT-A during the first two cycles will likely benefit from the third cycle of treatment, while the probability that non-responders to the first two cycles start responding during the third cycle is low. These results can help guide the individual decision to stop or continue treatment after the second cycle in patients who have not responded to the first two cycles. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-021-00253-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Ornello
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio 1 Coppito, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Fayyaz Ahmed
- Department of Neurosciences, Hull University Teaching Hospitals, Hull, UK
| | - Andrea Negro
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Miscio
- Headache Center, Unit of Neurology, , Fondazione IRCCS "Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza", San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
| | - Antonio Santoro
- Headache Center, Unit of Neurology, , Fondazione IRCCS "Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza", San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
| | - Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall D'Hebron University, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall D'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Russo
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic, and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Marcello Silvestro
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic, and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- IRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Brunelli
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Vernieri
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Licia Grazzi
- Headache Center, Neuroalgology Department, IRCCS Foundation "Carlo Besta" Neurological Institute, via Celoria, 11, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Baraldi
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Medical Toxicology, Headache and Drug Abuse Research Center, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Simona Guerzoni
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Medical Toxicology, Headache and Drug Abuse Research Center, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Anna P Andreou
- Headache Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Giorgio Lambru
- Headache Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ilaria Frattale
- Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, Systems Medicine Department, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Katharina Kamm
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University München, Munich, Germany
| | - Ruth Ruscheweyh
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University München, Munich, Germany
| | - Marco Russo
- Headache Center, Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Elena Filatova
- Department of Neurology, Institute for Postgraduate Education, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Nina Latysheva
- Department of Neurology, Institute for Postgraduate Education, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Marcin Straburzynski
- Headache Clinic, Terapia Neurologiczna Samodzielni, Maurycego Mochnackiego 10, 02-042, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Calogera Butera
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Bruno Colombo
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall D'Hebron University, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall D'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio 1 Coppito, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sacco S, Russo A, Geppetti P, Grazzi L, Negro A, Tassorelli C, Tedeschi G, Martelletti P. What is changing in chronic migraine treatment? An algorithm for onabotulinumtoxinA treatment by the Italian chronic migraine group. Expert Rev Neurother 2020; 20:1275-1286. [PMID: 32990477 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1825077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION OnabotulinumtoxinA (OBT-A) and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway are two of the few treatments that ameliorate chronic migraine (CM) in randomized controlled trials and real-life studies. Separate clinical practice guidelines have been developed for the management of CM with OBT-A or CGRP-targeting mAbs. AREAS COVERED Considering the concomitant availability of OBT-A and CGRP-targeting mAbs as therapeutic treatment options, Italian migraine experts reviewed the evidence supporting the efficacy of OBT-A and CGRP-targeting mAbs in CM in order to rationalize the management of CM patients treated with OBT-A. Experts addressed everyday practice needs to shape the optimal pharmacological management by balancing adherence to regulatory indications, ethical considerations, and clinical expertise. Considering the remarkable challenge of improving the health and quality of life of patients with CM, even partial improvements may be clinically meaningful, particularly for those who are resistant or intolerant to oral migraine treatments. EXPERT OPINION In this collaborative effort, we propose a treatment algorithm that integrates the relevant aspects of managing patients with CM to provide ready-to-use practical guidance regarding the appropriate use of OBT-A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Sacco
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila , L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic, and Aging Sciences, Headache Center, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" , Naples, Italy
| | - Pierangelo Geppetti
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology, Headache Center Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence , Florence, Italy
| | - Licia Grazzi
- Neuroalgology Unit, Headache Center, Neurological Institute "C. Besta" IRCCS Foundation , Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Negro
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University , Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Headache Science Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation , Pavia, PV, Italy.,Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia , Pavia, PV, Italy
| | - Gioacchino Tedeschi
- Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic, and Aging Sciences, Headache Center, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" , Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University , Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Donisi V, Mazzi MA, Gandolfi M, Deledda G, Marchioretto F, Battista S, Poli S, Giansante M, Geccherle E, Perlini C, Smania N, Del Piccolo L. Exploring Emotional Distress, Psychological Traits and Attitudes in Patients with Chronic Migraine Undergoing OnabotulinumtoxinA Prophylaxis versus Withdrawal Treatment. Toxins (Basel) 2020; 12:E577. [PMID: 32911799 PMCID: PMC7551686 DOI: 10.3390/toxins12090577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
This explorative cross-sectional study aims at exploring emotional distress, psychological profiles, and the attitude towards receiving psychological support in eighty-seven patients with chronic migraine (CM) undergoing OnabotulinumtoxinA prophylactic treatment (OBT-A, n = 40) or withdrawal treatment (WT, n = 47). The outcomes were explored through a specific battery of questionnaires. 25% of patients undergoing OBT-A and almost half of the patients undergoing WT reported psychological distress of at least moderate-severe level, respectively. Coping strategies, self-efficacy, and perceived social support were similar in the two groups. Patients undergoing OBT-A presented lower psychological inflexibility than patients undergoing WT. Predictors of higher psychological distress were low perceived social support by friends, low self-efficacy, and higher avoidance strategies. In both groups, most of the patients evaluated receiving psychological support to be useful (79%). The potential beneficial effects of OBT-A on the severity of symptoms and psychological distress might further support its role in the multidisciplinary management of patients with CM. Identifying patients with psychological vulnerabilities who may benefit from psychological support is relevant in patients with CM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Donisi
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134 Verona, Italy; (V.D.); (M.A.M.); (C.P.); (L.D.P.)
| | - Maria Angela Mazzi
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134 Verona, Italy; (V.D.); (M.A.M.); (C.P.); (L.D.P.)
| | - Marialuisa Gandolfi
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRRNC), University of Verona, UOC Neurorehabilitation, AOUI Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134 Verona, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Deledda
- Clinical Psychological Service, UO of Clinical Psychology, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalisation and Health Care (IRCCS), Sacro Cuore—Don Calabria, Negrar di Valpolicella, 37024 Verona, Italy; (G.D.); (S.P.); (M.G.); (E.G.)
| | - Fabio Marchioretto
- Neurological Unit, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalisation and Health Care (IRCCS), Sacro Cuore—Don Calabria, Negrar di Valpolicella, 37024 Verona, Italy;
| | - Simone Battista
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona, Via Magliotto, 2, 17100 Savona, Italy;
| | - Sara Poli
- Clinical Psychological Service, UO of Clinical Psychology, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalisation and Health Care (IRCCS), Sacro Cuore—Don Calabria, Negrar di Valpolicella, 37024 Verona, Italy; (G.D.); (S.P.); (M.G.); (E.G.)
| | - Matteo Giansante
- Clinical Psychological Service, UO of Clinical Psychology, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalisation and Health Care (IRCCS), Sacro Cuore—Don Calabria, Negrar di Valpolicella, 37024 Verona, Italy; (G.D.); (S.P.); (M.G.); (E.G.)
| | - Eleonora Geccherle
- Clinical Psychological Service, UO of Clinical Psychology, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalisation and Health Care (IRCCS), Sacro Cuore—Don Calabria, Negrar di Valpolicella, 37024 Verona, Italy; (G.D.); (S.P.); (M.G.); (E.G.)
| | - Cinzia Perlini
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134 Verona, Italy; (V.D.); (M.A.M.); (C.P.); (L.D.P.)
| | - Nicola Smania
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRRNC), University of Verona, UOC Neurorehabilitation, AOUI Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134 Verona, Italy;
| | - Lidia Del Piccolo
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134 Verona, Italy; (V.D.); (M.A.M.); (C.P.); (L.D.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chronic Migraine with Medication Overuse: Clinical Pattern and Evolution from a Retrospective Cohort in Seville, Spain. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s42399-020-00424-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
15
|
Chronic migraine long-term regular treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA: a retrospective real-life observational study up to 4 years of therapy. Neurol Sci 2020; 41:1809-1820. [PMID: 32052306 PMCID: PMC7359167 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-020-04283-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Introduction OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) was proved effective and safe in chronic migraine (CM) prevention by the Phase III Research Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis (PREEMPT) and Phase IV Chronic migraine OnabotulinuMtoxinA Prolonged Efficacy open-Label (COMPEL) trials over 1 and 2 years of treatment, respectively. Real-life studies highlighted BoNT-A sustained benefits up to 3 years of administration. Aim of this retrospective real-life study was observing within a 4-year timeframe the progress of a consecutive series of CM patients treated with BoNT-A and evaluating whether long-term quarterly treatment (up to 16 cycles) confirms the outcomes of previous studies over shorter periods of therapy. Methods One hundred nine chronic migraineurs were quarterly treated with BoNT-A according to the PREEMPT paradigm. Headache days and hours, analgesics intake and latency time together with disability were analysed at baseline, thereafter bi-annually up to 48 months. Patient responsiveness (improvement in monthly headache days and hours versus baseline) was computed at each study timepoint. Results A significant overall decrease from baseline to the 48-month assessment (p < 0.001) was evidenced for the mean number of monthly headache days and hours, analgesics intake and latency time. Severe disability cases significantly decreased at 6 months (p < 0.001), and a progressive shift towards lower degrees of disability was observed at each subsequent timepoint. A gradual percentage increase of responsive cases was observed as treatment was repeated over time. Transitory neck pain was reported in 6 cases. Conclusions This study appears to reconfirm the benefits of long-lasting CM prevention with BoNT-A, thus supporting quarterly treatment with BoNT-A over several year.
Collapse
|
16
|
Tessitore A, Russo A. Is targeting CGRP the right pathway to prevent migraine? Lancet 2019; 394:984-986. [PMID: 31427047 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31947-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Tessitore
- Headache Center, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgery Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli 80138, Italy.
| | - Antonio Russo
- Headache Center, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgery Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli 80138, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Agostoni EC, Barbanti P, Calabresi P, Colombo B, Cortelli P, Frediani F, Geppetti P, Grazzi L, Leone M, Martelletti P, Pini LA, Prudenzano MP, Sarchielli P, Tedeschi G, Russo A. Current and emerging evidence-based treatment options in chronic migraine: a narrative review. J Headache Pain 2019; 20:92. [PMID: 31470791 PMCID: PMC6734211 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-019-1038-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic migraine is a disabling condition that is currently underdiagnosed and undertreated. In this narrative review, we discuss the future of chronic migraine management in relation to recent progress in evidence-based pharmacological treatment. Findings Patients with chronic migraine require prophylactic therapy to reduce the frequency of migraine attacks, but the only currently available evidence-based prophylactic treatment options for chronic migraine are topiramate and onabotulinumtoxinA. Improved prophylactic therapy is needed to reduce the high burden of chronic migraine in Italy. Monoclonal antibodies that target the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway of migraine pathogenesis have been specifically developed for the prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine. These anti-CGRP/R monoclonal antibodies have demonstrated good efficacy and excellent tolerability in phase II and III clinical trials, and offer new hope to patients who are currently not taking any prophylactic therapy or not benefitting from their current treatment. Conclusions Treatment of chronic migraine is a dynamic and rapidly advancing area of research. New developments in this field have the potential to improve the diagnosis and provide more individualised treatments for this condition. Establishing a culture of prevention is essential for reducing the personal, social and economic burden of chronic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Piero Barbanti
- Headache and Pain Unit, Department of Neurological, Motor and Sensorial Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy. .,San Raffaele University, Rome, Italy.
| | - Paolo Calabresi
- Neurologic Clinic, Ospedale Santa Maria della, Perugia, Italy
| | - Bruno Colombo
- Dipartimento di Neurologia, Università Vita-Salute, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Cortelli
- IRCCS- Istituto di Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,DIBINEM- University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabio Frediani
- Headache Centre, UOC Neurologia e Stroke Unit, P.O. San Carlo Borromeo, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietrangelo Geppetti
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Headache Center, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Licia Grazzi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "C.Besta", Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Leone
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "C.Besta", Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Alberto Pini
- Headache Center, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neuro Science, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Maria Pia Prudenzano
- Headache Center, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Paola Sarchielli
- Headache Center, Neurologic Clinic, Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Gioacchino Tedeschi
- Headache Center Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic, and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Headache Center Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic, and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tajti J, Szok D, Nyári A, Vécsei L. Therapeutic strategies that act on the peripheral nervous system in primary headache disorders. Expert Rev Neurother 2019; 19:509-533. [DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2019.1615447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- János Tajti
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Excellence Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Délia Szok
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Excellence Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Aliz Nyári
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Excellence Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - László Vécsei
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Excellence Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- MTA-SZTE Neuroscience Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cowan RP. The Future of Migraine Prevention. Headache 2018; 58 Suppl 3:291-297. [DOI: 10.1111/head.13418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
20
|
Vikelis M, Argyriou AA, Dermitzakis EV, Spingos KC, Makris N, Kararizou E. Sustained onabotulinumtoxinA therapeutic benefits in patients with chronic migraine over 3 years of treatment. J Headache Pain 2018; 19:87. [PMID: 30225735 PMCID: PMC6755578 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-018-0918-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence on whether the therapeutic effect and good safety profile of onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) in chronic migraine (CM) patients is maintained over long term treatment is still limited. We herein aimed at assessing whether there is a sustained benefit and good safety with repeated onabotulinumtoxinA sessions in CM over more than three years of treatment. Methods We prospectively enrolled 65 CM patients, who were classified as responders after three sessions of onabotulinumtoxinA and were eligible to further continue treatment. Data documenting longitudinal changes from the trimester after the third onabotulinumtoxinA administration (T1) to the trimester after completing two years of treatment (T2) and eventually to the trimester after completing three years of treatment (T3) in (i) mean number of monthly headache days (ii) migraine severity as expressed by the mean number of days with peak headache intensity of > 4/10, and (iii) mean number of days with use of any acute headache medication, were prospectively collected from patients’ headache diaries. Results A total of 56 (86.1%) of 65 patients achieved to attain onabotulinumtoxinA over three years. At T3, a significant reduction in mean monthly headache days was evident, compared to T1 (3.4 ± 1.7 vs 7.2 ± 3.8; P < 0.001) with diminished mean number of monthly days with peak headache intensity of more than 4/10 and a significant change in days using acute headache medications per month between T1 and T3 (2.8 ± 1.3 vs 4.7 ± 3.2; P < 0.001). Significant changes were also noticed in all efficacy variables from T2 to T3. Therapy was safe and well tolerated with low rates of adverse events or drop-outs. Conclusion The long -term treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA proved effective, safe and well tolerated over three years. Our findings support the strategy to consistently deliver sessions of use of onabotulinumtoxinΑ over long time in CM patients (Trial registration NTC03606356, registered retrospectively, 28 July 2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michail Vikelis
- Headache Clinic, Mediterraneo Hospital, Glyfada, Greece. .,Glyfada Headache Clinic, 8 Lazaraki Str, 16675, Glyfada, Greece. .,Headache Outpatient Clinic, 1st Department of Neurology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
| | - Andreas A Argyriou
- Neurology Department, Saint Andrew's State General Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | | | | | - Nikolaos Makris
- Neurology Department, Saint Andrew's State General Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Evangelia Kararizou
- Headache Outpatient Clinic, 1st Department of Neurology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
An intramuscular formulation of onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA; Botox®) is currently the only therapy specifically approved for the prevention of headaches in adults with chronic migraine (CM) in the EU and North America. This article provides a narrative review of relevant data on the drug in this indication from an EU perspective. OnabotA was originally approved on the basis of pooled data from two phase III studies (PREEMPT 1 and 2). In these pivotal studies, injection of up to five cycles of onabotA (155-195 U/cycle) at 12-week intervals was generally well tolerated and effective in producing statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in headache symptoms, acute headache pain medication usage, headache impact and health-related quality of life in adults with CM, of whom approximately two-thirds were acute medication overusers and approximately one-third had failed to respond to ≥ 3 prior oral prophylactic therapies. More recently, the efficacy and tolerability of onabotA over a period of 1 year in the PREEMPT programme has been substantiated and extended by the results of a long-term phase IV study (COMPEL), in which patients received up to nine treatment cycles over a period of 2 years, and by findings from several real-world clinical practice studies from Europe, including the prospective multinational REPOSE and CM-PASS studies. In conclusion, the totality of evidence from clinical trials and real-world studies indicates that onabotA is an effective and generally well tolerated option for the prevention of CM that may be particularly useful for patients who have previously failed to respond to or are intolerant of commonly prescribed oral prophylactics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E Frampton
- Springer, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, 0754, New Zealand.
| | | |
Collapse
|