1
|
Alpuente A, Torres-Ferrus M, Caronna E, Pozo-Rosich P. The state of art on the use of patient reported outcomes in migraine. Curr Opin Neurol 2024; 37:271-282. [PMID: 38529698 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000001267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review aims to explore the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in migraine. Traditionally assessed through specific features, recent adoption of PROMs allows for a more objective and quantifiable evaluation. PROMs, which are standardized questionnaires collecting health information directly from a patients' perspective, cover various aspects, including migraine specific aspects. The review focuses on delineating the applications and interpretation of commonly used PROMs in migraine research, with an emphasis on their integration in clinical care. RECENT FINDINGS Generic and migraine-specific PROMs play a crucial role in clinical research, particularly in assessing health-related quality of life, disability, impact, and associated comorbidities. Some of these measures are strongly recommended to be used by the International Guidelines and are, in fact, mandated by the FDA for product labeling. Recently, there has been an expansion in the use of PROMs to assess migraine in diverse populations, in particular pediatric patients. However, the application of these measures in clinical care shows considerable heterogeneity, and some have not been validated specifically for migraine. The existing multitude of PROMs, coupled with ongoing development of new ones to better capture patient concerns, creates complexity in their research and clinical application. To address these challenges, it becomes imperative to streamline their use, focusing on those that are more validated and better aligned with the patients' perspective including different populations' needs. SUMMARY The utilization of PROMs in evaluating migraine enables a more holistic assessment, helps quantify the impact of the disease facilitating change measurement, improves communication between healthcare providers and patients and, guides treatment decisions for improved outcomes. However, the increasing number of PROMs questionnaires, underscores the importance of validating these tools for migraine and, the dynamic nature of the disease makes it relevant to decide with whom, why and when these should be used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Torres-Ferrus
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Belvís R, Irimia P, González N, García-Ull J, Pozo-Rosich P, López-Bravo A, Morollón N, Quintas S, Plana A, Baz PG, Tentor A, Gallego Artiles N, León FJ, Pérez Martín M, Rivera I, Ramírez R, Colomina I, Lainez JM, Pascual J. Migraine treatment consensus document of the Spanish Society of Neurology (SEN), Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine (SEMFYC), Society of Primary Care Medicine (SEMERGEN) and Spanish Association of Migraine and Headache (AEMICE) on migraine treatment. Med Clin (Barc) 2024:S0025-7753(24)00137-4. [PMID: 38643025 DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2024.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
Migraine is a disease with a high prevalence and incidence, in addition to being highly disabling, causing a great impact on the patient's quality of life at a personal, family and work level, but also social, given its high expense due to its direct (care) and indirect (presenteeism and work absenteeism) costs. The multiple and recent developments in its pathophysiological knowledge and in its therapy require updating and, therefore, in this article the Spanish scientific societies most involved in its study and treatment (SEN, SEMFYC and SEMERGEN), together with the Association Spanish Association for Patients with Migraine and other Headaches (AEMICE), we have developed these updated care recommendations. We reviewed the treatment of migraine attacks, which consisted mainly of the use of NSAIDs and triptans, to which ditans and gepants have been added. We also discuss preventive treatment consisting of oral preventive drugs, botulinum toxin, and treatments that block the action of calcitonin-related peptide (CGRP). Finally, we emphasize that pharmacological treatments must be complementary to carrying out general measures consisting of identifying and managing/deletion the precipitating factors of the attacks and the chronicizing factors, controlling the comorbidities of migraine and eliminating analgesic overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Belvís
- Unidad de Cefaleas y Neuralgias, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Barcelona, España.
| | - Pablo Irimia
- Servicio de Neurología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Pamplona, España
| | - Nuria González
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario San Carlos. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Madrid, España
| | - Jésica García-Ull
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Valencia, España
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Unidad de Cefalea y Grupo de Investigación en Cefalea, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Vall d'Hebron y Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Barcelona, España
| | - Alba López-Bravo
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Sección de Neurología, Hospital Reina Sofía. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón (IIS-A). Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Tudela, Navarra, España
| | - Noemí Morollón
- Unidad de Cefaleas y Neuralgias, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Barcelona, España
| | - Sonia Quintas
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital de La Princesa. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Madrid, España
| | - Antoni Plana
- ABS Balàfia-Pardinyes-Secà de Sant Pere de Lleida, Àmbit Lleida. Institut Català de la Salut (ICS). Grupo de Trabajo de Neurología SEMFYC, Lleida, España
| | | | | | | | - Francisco Javier León
- Centro de Salut Dúrcal, Distrito Sanitario Granada Metropolitano. Grupo de Trabajo de Neurología SEMFYC, Granada, España
| | | | - Inés Rivera
- C.S. Barranco Grande, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España
| | - Raquel Ramírez
- Servicio de Medicina de Familia, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Madrid, España
| | | | - José Miguel Lainez
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Valencia, España
| | - Julio Pascual
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria e IDIVAL. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Santander, España
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alpuente A, Gallardo VJ, Asskour L, Caronna E, Torres-Ferrus M, Pozo-Rosich P. Dynamic fluctuations of salivary CGRP levels during migraine attacks: association with clinical variables and phenotypic characterization. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:58. [PMID: 38637736 PMCID: PMC11027425 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01772-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a complex neurological disorder with significant heterogeneity in its clinical presentation and molecular mechanisms. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has emerged as a key player in migraine pathophysiology, but challenges remain in its utilization as a biomarker. This study aimed to investigate salivary CGRP levels during migraine attacks across the frequency spectrum and explore associations with clinical variables. METHODS A prospective longitudinal pilot study was conducted, recruiting migraine patients from an outpatient headache clinic. Salivary CGRP levels were measured at interictal, onset, post-2 h of onset and end-of-attack. Using generalized linear mixed models, we explored the effect of CGRP changes over the attack in presence of depressive symptoms (DS), acute attack treatment, and after three-months of erenumab treatment. Finally, patients were classified and compared according to their CGRP phenotype. RESULTS A total of 44 migraine patients were included (90.9% women), with 80 migraine attacks analyzed. Salivary CGRP levels increased at the onset of migraine attacks. We observed statistically significant interactions between DS and both the linear (Est. [SE]: 19.4 [5.8], p = 0.001) and quadratic terms of time (-19.1 [6.0], p = 0.002). Additionally, a significant three-way interaction within the use of acute treated attack (linear-term: -18.5 [6.2], p = 0.005; quadratic-term: 19.2 [6.8], p = 0.005) was also found. Molecular phenotyping revealed that 72.7% (32/44) of patients presented only CGRP-dependent attacks, while 27.3% (12/44) presented non-CGRP-dependent migraine attacks. Patients with only CGRP-dependent attacks were associated with younger age, shorter disease evolution time, a higher proportion of aura, and fewer monthly headache days (p < 0.05). Exploratory analysis of erenumab treatment effects did not result in changes in CGRP levels during migraine attacks. CONCLUSIONS Our study underscores the dynamic nature of migraine at a molecular level and emphasizes the importance of integrating clinical variables, such as depressive symptoms, in understanding its pathophysiology. The identification of distinct migraine subtypes based on CGRP dependence suggests potential opportunities for personalized treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Alpuente
- Neurology Department, Headache Clinic, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victor J Gallardo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laila Asskour
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo Caronna
- Neurology Department, Headache Clinic, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Torres-Ferrus
- Neurology Department, Headache Clinic, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Neurology Department, Headache Clinic, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pozo-Rosich P, Carmo M, Muñiz A, Armada B, Moya-Alarcón C, Pascual J. Migraine treatment: quo vadis? Real-world data study (2015-2022) in Spain. BMC Neurol 2024; 24:107. [PMID: 38566063 PMCID: PMC10985889 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-024-03600-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a leading cause of disability, estimated to affect one-in-ten people in Spain. This study aimed to describe the management of migraine in Spain and identify improvement areas. METHODS Non-interventional, retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study conducted using an electronic medical records database covering visits to public healthcare providers for 3% of the Spanish population. Patients with a migraine diagnosis (ICD-9 346) between 01/2015 and 04/2022 were included, as well as their demographic and clinical characteristics, prescribed migraine treatments and the specialty of the prescribing physicians. RESULTS The database included 61,204 patients diagnosed with migraine. A migraine treatment had been prescribed to 50.6% of patients over the last 24 months (only acute to 69.5%, both acute and preventive to 24.2%, and only preventive to 6.3%). The most frequently prescribed treatments were NSAIDs (56.3%), triptans (44.1%) and analgesics (28.9%). Antidepressants were the most common preventive treatment (prescribed to 17.9% of all treated patients and 58.7% of those treated with a preventive medication), and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies the least prescribed (1.7%; 5.7%). In 13.4% of cases, preventive medications were the first treatment: alone in 5.8% of cases and together with an acute medication in 7.6%. A fifth of patients who were initially prescribed with only acute treatment were later prescribed a preventive medication (20.7%). On average, it took 29.4 months for this change to occur. Two-thirds of patients started their preventive treatment in primary care (64.2%). The percentage of patients treated by a neurologist increased with the number of received preventive medications. However, 28.8% of patients who had already been prescribed five or more distinct preventive treatments were not treated by a neurologist. Migraine patients had between 1.2- and 2.2-times higher prevalence of comorbidities than the general population, age-gender adjusted. CONCLUSIONS Our study emphasizes the need for improved management of migraine in Spain to reduce the risk of chronification and improve patient outcomes. More training and coordination across healthcare professionals is necessary to recognize and address risk factors for migraine progression, including multiple associated comorbidities and several lines of treatment, and to provide personalized treatment plans that address the complex nature of the condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Neurology Department, Headache Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, 119-129 Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, 08035, Spain.
- Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | - Julio Pascual
- Service of Neurology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria and Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pozo-Rosich P, Ashina M, Tepper SJ, Jensen S, Boserup LP, Josiassen MK, Sperling B. Eptinezumab Demonstrated Efficacy Regardless of Prior Preventive Migraine Treatment Failure Type: Post Hoc Analyses of the DELIVER Study. Neurol Ther 2024; 13:339-353. [PMID: 38236314 PMCID: PMC10951156 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00575-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the DELIVER study, eptinezumab reduced monthly migraine days (MMDs) more than placebo in patients with 2-4 prior preventive migraine treatment failures. This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy of eptinezumab across the 24-week placebo-controlled period of the DELIVER study in subgroups defined by prior treatment failure type. METHODS DELIVER (NCT04418765) randomized adults with migraine to eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo, administered intravenously every 12 weeks. Changes from baseline in MMDs and percentages of patients with ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in MMDs (≥ 50% migraine responder rates [MRRs]) were summarized in subgroups of patients defined by prior treatment failure type. Subgroups were not mutually exclusive and included patients for whom topiramate, beta blockers (metoprolol, propranolol), amitriptyline, and/or flunarizine had failed. RESULTS Across Weeks 1-12 in all subgroups, patients treated with eptinezumab experienced greater reductions from baseline in MMDs than those receiving placebo (reductions ranged from 4.5-5.5 vs 1.6-2.4, respectively), with larger reductions over Weeks 13-24. Similarly, ≥ 50% MRRs were consistently higher with eptinezumab than placebo and increased following a second infusion. CONCLUSION In all subgroups, regardless of prior preventive treatment failure type, eptinezumab demonstrated greater reductions in MMDs and higher MRRs compared with placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04418765).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Neurology Department, Headache Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
- Headache Research Group, Department of Medicine, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stewart J Tepper
- New England Institute for Neurology and Headache, Stamford, CT, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tassorelli C, Nagy K, Pozo-Rosich P, Lanteri-Minet M, Sacco S, Nežádal T, Guo H, De Abreu Ferreira R, Forero G, Trugman JM. Safety and efficacy of atogepant for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine in adults for whom conventional oral preventive treatments have failed (ELEVATE): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol 2024; 23:382-392. [PMID: 38364831 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00025-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atogepant, an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, has been approved for the preventive treatment of migraine, but its efficacy and safety in people who have been failed by conventional oral preventive migraine treatments has not yet been evaluated in a dedicated clinical trial. The ELEVATE trial evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of atogepant for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine in participants for whom two to four classes of conventional oral preventive treatments have failed. METHODS ELEVATE was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3b trial done at 73 sites in Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Spain, the UK, and the USA. Adults (18-80 years) with episodic migraine who had previously been failed by two to four classes of conventional oral treatments for migraine prevention were randomly assigned (1:1) using interactive web response technology to oral atogepant 60 mg once a day or placebo, stratified by baseline monthly migraine days, number of treatment classes participants have been failed by, and region. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in mean monthly migraine days across the 12-week treatment period in the off-treatment hypothetical estimand (OTHE) population, which included participants in the safety population (all participants who received ≥1 dose of study intervention) who had evaluable data available for the baseline period and for one or more of the 4-week post-baseline periods (whether on treatment or off treatment). The primary endpoint was analysed using a mixed model for repeated measures and a fixed-sequence procedure was used to control for multiple comparisons. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04740827) and EudraCT (2019-003448-58), and is completed. FINDINGS Between March 5, 2021, and Aug 4, 2022, 540 participants were screened, 315 were randomly assigned, and 313 participants (280 [89%] female, 33 [11%] male, and 300 [96%] White) received at least one dose of study intervention. In the OTHE population, which comprised 309 participants (155 assigned to placebo and 154 to atogepant), least squares mean changes from baseline in monthly migraine days across 12 weeks were -1·9 (SE 0·4) with placebo and -4·2 (0·4) with atogepant (least squares mean difference -2·4, 95% CI -3·2 to -1·5; adjusted p<0·0001). The most common treatment-emergent adverse event with atogepant was constipation in 16 (10%) of 156 participants (vs four [3%] of 157 for placebo). Serious adverse events occurred in four [3%] of 156 participants in the atogepant group vs none in the placebo group, and treatment-emergent adverse events resulting in treatment discontinuation occurred in three [2%] in the atogepant group vs two [1%] in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION Atogepant 60 mg once a day was safe, well tolerated, and showed significant and clinically relevant reductions in mean monthly migraine days compared with placebo across 12 weeks in patients with episodic migraine who had previously been failed by two to four classes of conventional oral preventive treatments. Atogepant might be an effective preventive treatment option for patients in this difficult-to-treat population. FUNDING Allergan (now AbbVie).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Tassorelli
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Science, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Centre, IRCCS C Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
| | | | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michel Lanteri-Minet
- Pain Department and FHU InovPain, CHU Nice and Côte Azur University, Nice, France; INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain, Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Sara Sacco
- Carolinas Headache Clinic, Matthews, NC, USA
| | - Tomáš Nežádal
- Neurology Department, Military University Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pozo-Rosich P, Dolezil D, Paemeleire K, Stepien A, Stude P, Snellman J, Arkuszewski M, Stites T, Ritter S, Lopez CL, Maca J, Ferraris M, Gil-Gouveia R. Early Use of Erenumab vs Nonspecific Oral Migraine Preventives: The APPRAISE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol 2024:2816800. [PMID: 38526461 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
Importance Patients with migraine often cycle through multiple nonspecific preventive medications due to poor tolerability and/or inadequate efficacy leading to low adherence and increased disease burden. Objective To compare the efficacy, tolerability, patient adherence, and patient satisfaction between erenumab and nonspecific oral migraine preventive medications (OMPMs) in patients with episodic migraine (EM) who had previously failed 1 or 2 preventive treatments. Design, Setting, and Participants The 12-month prospective, interventional, global, multicenter, active-controlled, randomized clinical trial comparing sustained benefit of 2 treatment paradigms (erenumab qm vs oral prophylactics) in adult episodic migraine patients (APPRAISE) trial was a 12-month open-label, multicenter, active-controlled, phase 4 randomized clinical trial conducted from May 15, 2019, to October 1, 2021. This pragmatic trial was conducted at 84 centers across 17 countries. Overall, participants 18 years or older with a 12-month or longer history of migraine, and 4 or more but fewer than 15 monthly migraine days (MMDs) were included. Interventions Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive erenumab or OMPMs. Dose adjustment was permitted (label dependent). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the proportion of patients completing 1 year of the initially assigned treatment and achieving a reduction of 50% or greater from baseline in MMDs at month 12. Secondary end points included the cumulative mean change from baseline in MMDs during the treatment period and the proportion of responders according to the Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale at month 12 for patients taking the initially assigned treatment. Results A total of 866 patients were screened, of whom 245 failed the screening and 621 completed the screening and baseline period. Of the 621 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 41.3 [11.2] years; 545 female [87.8%]; 413 [66.5%] in the erenumab group; 208 [33.5%] in the OMPM group), 523 (84.2%) completed the treatment phase, and 98 (15.8%) discontinued the study. At month 12, significantly more patients assigned to erenumab vs OMPM achieved the primary end point (232 of 413 [56.2%] vs 35 of 208 [16.8%]; odds ratio [OR], 6.48; 95% CI, 4.28-9.82; P <.001). Compared with OMPMs, treatment with erenumab showed higher responder rate (314 of 413 [76.0%] vs 39 of 208 [18.8%]; OR, 13.75; 95% CI, 9.08-20.83; P <.001) on the PGIC scale (≥5 at month 12). Significant reduction in cumulative average MMDs was reported with erenumab treatment vs OMPM treatment (-4.32 vs -2.65; treatment difference [SE]: -1.67 [0.35] days; P < .001). Substantially fewer patients in the erenumab arm compared with the OMPM arm switched medication (9 of 413 [2.2%] vs 72 of 208 [34.6%]) and discontinued treatment due to adverse events (12 of 408 [2.9%] vs 48 of 206 [23.3%]). No new safety signals were identified. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this randomized clinical trial demonstrated that earlier use of erenumab in patients with EM who failed 1 or 2 previous preventive treatments provided greater and sustained efficacy, safety, and adherence than continuous OMPM. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03927144.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Dolezil
- Headache Center, Dado Medical sro, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Koen Paemeleire
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Adam Stepien
- Department of Neurology, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | | | - Tracy Stites
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey
| | - Shannon Ritter
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey
| | | | - Jeff Maca
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey
| | | | - Raquel Gil-Gouveia
- Hospital da Luz Headache Center, Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz, Lisboa, Portugal
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pozo-Rosich P, Poveda JL, Crespo C, Martínez M, Rodríguez JM, Irimia P. Is erenumab an efficient alternative for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine in Spain? Results of a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:40. [PMID: 38491460 PMCID: PMC10943917 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01747-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The reimbursement of erenumab in Spain and other European countries is currently restricted because of the cost of this novel therapy to patients with migraine who have experienced previous failures to traditional preventive treatments. However, this reimbursement policy should be preferably based on cost-effectiveness studies, among other criteria. This study performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of erenumab versus topiramate for the prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine (EM) and versus placebo for chronic migraine (CM). METHODS A Markov model with a 10-year time horizon, from the perspective of the Spanish National Healthcare System, was constructed based on data from responder and non-responder patients. A responder was defined as having a minimum 50% reduction in the number of monthly migraine days (MMD). A hypothetical cohort of patients with EM with one or more prior preventive treatment failures and patients with CM with more than two treatment failures was considered. The effectiveness score was measured as an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and cost per migraine day (MD) avoided. Data from clinical outcomes and patient characteristics were obtained from erenumab clinical trials (NCT02066415, STRIVE, ARISE, LIBERTY and HER-MES). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to validate the robustness of the model. RESULTS After a 10-year follow-up, the estimated QALYs were 5.88 and 6.11 for patients with EM treated with topiramate and erenumab, respectively. Erenumab showed an incremental cost per patient of €4,420 vs topiramate. For CM patients, erenumab resulted in 0.756 QALYs gained vs placebo; and an incremental cost of €1,814. Patients treated with erenumab achieved reductions in MD for both EM and CM (172 and 568 MDs, respectively). The incremental cost per QALY gained with erenumab was below the Spanish threshold of €30,000/QALY for both health and societal perspectives (EM €19,122/QALY and CM €2,398/QALY). CONCLUSIONS Erenumab is cost-effective versus topiramate as a preventive treatment for EM and versus placebo for patients with CM from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Neurology Department, Headache Unit, Valld'Hebron University Hospital, Ps. Vall d'Hebron 119-12, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
- Headache Research Group, Medicine Departament, VHIR, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - José Luis Poveda
- Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Carlos Crespo
- Axentiva Solutions, Barcelona, Spain
- G.M. Statistics Department, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Pablo Irimia
- Department of Neurology, Headache Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Irimia P, Santos-Lasaosa S, Pozo-Rosich P, Leira R, Pascual J, Láinez JM. Eptinezumab for the preventive treatment of episodic and chronic migraine: a narrative review. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1355877. [PMID: 38523607 PMCID: PMC10959239 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1355877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Eptinezumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), was recently approved in Europe for the prophylactic treatment of migraine in adults who have at least four migraine days a month. Eptinezumab is administered by intravenous infusion every 12 weeks. During recent months, a considerable amount of evidence from eptinezumab trials has been published. The aim of this review is to describe the existing evidence on the tolerability, safety and efficacy of eptinezumab in patients with migraine. Data from randomized (PROMISE-1, PROMISE-2, RELIEF and DELIVER) and open-label (PREVAIL) phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated the favorable effect of eptinezumab in migraine symptoms from first day of treatment. These studies showed that eptinezumab results in an overall reduction in mean monthly migraine days (MMDs), increases in the ≥50% and ≥ 75% migraine responder rates (MRRs) and improvements in patient-reported outcome measures in both patients with episodic migraine (EM) and with chronic migraine (CM), including patients who failed previous preventive treatments. The RELIEF trial also showed that eptinezumab, within 2 h of administration, reduced headache pain, migraine-associated symptoms and acute medication use when administered during a migraine attack. Eptinezumab benefits manifested as early as day 1 after dosing and with the subsequent doses lasted up to at least 2 years. Treatment-emergent adverse events reported by ≥2% of patients included upper respiratory tract infection and fatigue. Current evidence demonstrates that eptinezumab has a potent, fast-acting, sustained migraine preventive effect in patients with EM and CM. Eptinezumab has also shown to be well tolerated, supporting its use in the treatment of patients with migraine and inclusion in the current migraine therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sonia Santos-Lasaosa
- Aragon Institute for Health Research (IIS Aragon), Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, VHIR, Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rogelio Leira
- Department of Neurology, Headache Unit, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Julio Pascual
- Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria and IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - José Miguel Láinez
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Universidad Católica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ashina H, Diener HC, Tassorelli C, Scher AI, Lipton RB, Pozo-Rosich P, Sinclair AJ, Chong CD, Finkel AG, Ashina M, Schwedt TJ, Dodick DW, Terwindt GM. Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of pharmacological preventive treatment for persistent post-traumatic headache attributed to mild traumatic brain injury. Cephalalgia 2024; 44:3331024241234068. [PMID: 38518177 DOI: 10.1177/03331024241234068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Persistent headache attributed to traumatic injury to the head is divided into two subtypes, one attributed to moderate or severe traumatic injury and another attributed to mild traumatic injury (i.e., concussion). The latter is much more prevalent, in part because more than 90% of cases with traumatic brain injury are classified as mild. The pathophysiology of persistent post-traumatic headache is poorly understood and the underlying mechanisms are likely multifactorial. There is currently no approved treatment specifically for persistent post-traumatic headache, and management strategies rely on medications used for migraine or tension-type headache. Therefore, high-quality trials are urgently needed to support clinical decision-making and optimize management strategies. International guidelines can facilitate appropriate trial design and ensure the acquisition of high-quality data evaluating the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of available and novel pharmacological therapies for the preventive treatment of persistent post-traumatic headache. METHODS The development of this guideline was based on a literature review of available studies in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, along with a review of previously published guidelines for controlled trials of preventive treatment for episodic and chronic migraine. The identified literature was critically appraised, and due to the scarcity of scientific evidence, recommendations were primarily based on the consensus of experts in the field. OBJECTIVE To provide guidelines for designing state-of-the-art controlled clinical trials aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of preventive treatments for persistent post-traumatic headache attributed to mild traumatic brain injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Håkan Ashina
- Harvard Medical School, MA, USA
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Brain and Spinal Cord Injury, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hans-Christoph Diener
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Headache Science & Neurorehabilitation Centre, IRCCS C Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Ann I Scher
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Richard B Lipton
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
- Montefiore Headache Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital; and Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alexandra J Sinclair
- Translational Brain Science, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Messoud Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Todd J Schwedt
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - David W Dodick
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Gisela M Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mitsikostas DDD, Caronna E, De Tommaso M, Deligianni CI, Ekizoglu E, Bolay H, Göbel CH, Kristoffersen ES, Lampl C, Moro E, Pozo-Rosich P, Sellner J, Terwindt G, Irimia-Sieira P. Headaches and facial pain attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination: a systematic review. Eur J Neurol 2024:e16251. [PMID: 38415282 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The aim was to provide insights to the characteristics of headache in the context of COVID-19 on behalf of the Headache Scientific Panel and the Neuro-COVID-19 Task Force of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the European Headache Federation (EHF). METHODS Following the Delphi method the Task Force identified six relevant questions and then conducted a systematic literature review to provide evidence-based answers and suggest specific diagnostic criteria. RESULTS No data for facial pain were identified in the literature search. (1) Headache incidence during acute COVID-19 varies considerably, with higher prevalence rates in prospective compared to retrospective studies (28.9%-74.6% vs. 6.5%-34.0%). (2) Acute COVID-19 headache is usually bilateral or holocranial and often moderate to severe with throbbing pain quality lasting 2-14 days after first signs of COVID-19; photo-phonophobia, nausea, anosmia and ageusia are common associated features; persistent headache shares similar clinical characteristics. (3) Acute COVID-19 headache is presumably caused by immune-mediated mechanisms that activate the trigeminovascular system. (4) Headache occurs in 13.3%-76.9% following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and occurs more often amongst women with a pre-existing primary headache; the risk of developing headache is higher with the adenoviral-vector-type vaccines than with other preparations. (5) Headache related to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is mostly bilateral, and throbbing, pressing, jolting or stabbing. (6) No studies have been conducted investigating the underlying mechanism of headache attributed to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. CONCLUSION The results of this joint EAN/EHF initiative provide a framework for a better understanding of headache in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimos-Dimtirios D Mitsikostas
- Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Department of Medicine, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marina De Tommaso
- Neurophysiopathology Unit, DiBrain Department, Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Esme Ekizoglu
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hayrunnisa Bolay
- Department of Neurology and Algology, NÖROM, Gazi University Ankara, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Carl H Göbel
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Espen Saxhaug Kristoffersen
- Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- NorHEAD, Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Department of General Practice, HELSAM, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Christian Lampl
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit, Konventhospital Barmherzige Brüder Linz, Linz, Austria
- Headache Medical Center Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Elena Moro
- Division of Neurology, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Department of Medicine, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Johann Sellner
- Department of Neurology, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Mistelbach, Austria
| | - Gisela Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lazaro-Hernandez C, Caronna E, Rosell-Mirmi J, Gallardo VJ, Alpuente A, Torres-Ferrus M, Pozo-Rosich P. Early and annual projected savings from anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine prevention: a cost-benefit analysis in the working-age population. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:21. [PMID: 38347485 PMCID: PMC10860274 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01727-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is one of the main causes of disability worldwide. Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have proven to be safe and efficacious as preventive migraine treatments. However, their use is restricted in many countries due to their apparently high cost. Cost-benefit studies are needed. OBJECTIVE To study the cost-benefit of anti-CGRP MAbs in working-age patients with migraine. METHODS This is a prospective cohort study of consecutive migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP MAbs (erenumab, fremanezumab and galcanezumab) following National reimbursement policy in a specialized headache clinic. Migraine characteristics and the work impact scale (WPAI) were compared between baseline (M0) and after 3 (M3) and 6 months (M6) of treatment. Using WPAI and the municipal average hourly wage, we calculated indirect costs (absenteeism and presenteeism) at each time point. Direct costs (emergency visits, acute medication use) were also analysed. A cost-benefit study was performed considering the different costs and savings of treating with MAbs. Based on these data an annual projection was conducted. RESULTS From 256 treated working-age patients, 148 were employed (89.2% women; mean age 48.0 ± 8.5 years), of which 41.2% (61/148) were responders (> 50% reduction in monthly headache days (MHD)). Statistically significant reductions between M0 and M3/M6 were found in absenteeism (p < 0.001) and presenteeism (p < 0.001). Average savings in indirect costs per patient at M3 were absenteeism 105.4 euros/month and presenteeism 394.3 euros/month, similar for M6. Considering the monthly cost of anti-CGRP MAbs, the cost-benefit analysis showed savings of 159.8 euros per patient at M3, with an annual projected savings of 639.2 euros/patient. Both responders and partial responders (30-50% reduction in MHD) presented a positive cost-benefit balance. The overall savings of the cohort at M3/M6 compensated the negative cost-benefit balance for non-responders (< 30% reduction in MHD). CONCLUSION Anti-CGRP MAbs have a positive impact in the workforce significantly reducing absenteeism and presenteeism. In Spain, this benefit overcomes the expenses derived from their use already at 3 months and is potentially sustainable at longer term; also in patients who are only partial responders, prompting reconsideration of current reimbursement criteria and motivating the extension of similar cost-benefit studies in other countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joana Rosell-Mirmi
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victor J Gallardo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Torres-Ferrus
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Goadsby PJ, Evers S, Gelfand AA, Lipton RB, May A, Pozo-Rosich P, Schoenen J, Schwedt TJ, Tassorelli C, Terwindt G, Wang SJ. International Classification of Headache Disorders-4 - Work in Progress 1. Cephalalgia 2024; 44:3331024241233937. [PMID: 38388354 DOI: 10.1177/03331024241233937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Goadsby
- King's College London, Headache Group, NIHR King's Clinical Research, London, UK
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Stefan Evers
- Faculty of Medine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Amy A Gelfand
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Arne May
- University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Jean Schoenen
- Headache Research, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | | | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Headache Science Center, Pavia, Italy
| | - Gisela Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Shuu-Jiun Wang
- Department of Neurology, Taipei-Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Torres-Ferrús M, Gallardo VJ, Alpuente A, Caronna E, Giné-Ciprés E, Pozo-Rosich P. Improvement of migraine depressive symptoms is not related to headache frequency: exploring the impact of anti-CGRP therapies. Cephalalgia 2024; 44:3331024231222923. [PMID: 38307497 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231222923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present study aimed to describe the prevalence and evolution of depressive symptoms in a cohort of migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies. METHODS This is an exploratory, prospective, unicentric, one-year longitudinal study. We included migraine patients who started treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies. Baseline demographic data, medical history, concomitant medication and migraine characteristics were collected. The presence of depressive symptoms was evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory-II quarterly and treatment response was categorized according to the reduction in monthly headache days. A generalized mixed-effect regression model was used to model depression score over a one-year treatment taking into account frequency response rates. RESULTS We included 577 patients: 84.2% females; median (range) age 47.0 (39.0-53.0) years, 46.1% (266/577) of them presented depressive symptoms at baseline (16.1% mild, 13.3% moderate and 16.6% severe). After six-month treatment, 47.4% (126/266) reduced headache frequency ≥50% after one year and 63.5% (169/266) achieved a clinically significant improvement in depression symptoms. We observed a 30.8% (-50.0%, -3.2%) main reduction in depression score during the first quarter. The improvement in depression symptoms was independently associated with headache frequency response: non-responders, -25.0% (-43.9%, -1.1%); partial responders, -30.2% (-51.3%, -7.6%); and good responders, -33.3% (-54.6%, -7.5%). CONCLUSIONS Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP are effective in reducing depressive symptoms in patients with migraine. The main change of depression score happens during the first three months of treatment. The reduction in depressive symptoms is independent of migraine frequency improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Torres-Ferrús
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victor J Gallardo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eulalia Giné-Ciprés
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ikumi N, Marti-Marca A, Torre-Suñe ADL, Cerda-Company X, Vilà-Balló A, Gallardo VJ, Caronna E, Alpuente A, Pozo-Rosich P. Quantifying sensory thresholds along the migraine cycle: An exploratory longitudinal study. Cephalalgia 2024; 44:3331024241230279. [PMID: 38416486 DOI: 10.1177/03331024241230279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, a number of studies on migraine have cross-sectionally evaluated sensory sensitivity with aversion thresholds/scores along the migraine cycle, reporting a decreased tolerance to sensory stimuli in different sensory modalities. Our hypothesis was that patients with migraine would exhibit heightened sensitivity to sound, light, touch and smell on days where they reported greater headache intensity. METHODS This is an exploratory, longitudinal study, carried out over the course of 27 days. Aversion thresholds or scores to sound, light, touch and smell were quantified in six patients with migraine (11.33 ± 6.53 headache days/month). RESULTS Patients reported an increased sensitivity to light (padj = 0.0297), touch (padj = 0.0077), and smell (padj = 0.0201) on days with higher headache intensity. However, a greater sensitivity to sound on days with higher headache intensity was only reported when anxiety levels were high (padj = 1.4e-06). Interestingly, variable levels of tolerance to bothersome light over time can also influence the correlation between light sensitivity and headache intensity (padj = 1.4e-06). CONCLUSIONS Based on the present findings, future longitudinal studies evaluating sensory threshold changes along the migraine cycle in patients with migraine should account for the increased tolerance to bothersome light over time as well as the effect of anxiety on auditory sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nara Ikumi
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Angela Marti-Marca
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna de la Torre-Suñe
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xim Cerda-Company
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Adrià Vilà-Balló
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victor J Gallardo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Caronna E, Alpuente A, Torres-Ferrus M, Pozo-Rosich P. CGRP monoclonal antibodies and CGRP receptor antagonists (Gepants) in migraine prevention. Handb Clin Neurol 2024; 199:107-124. [PMID: 38307640 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-823357-3.00024-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
Migraine is a prevalent and disabling neurological disease. Its preventive treatment for decades has been rather limited due to the absence of disease-specific therapies with limited efficacy and tolerability. The advances made in migraine research have led to the discovery of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and its role in migraine pathophysiology. CGRP is a neuropeptide that acts as potent vasodilator and is involved in pain processing. Increased levels of plasma CGRP have been observed during migraine attacks as well as interictally when comparing patients with migraine and healthy controls. In the last years, two classes of drugs antagonizing CGRP have therefore been developed as the first migraine-specific preventive treatments: anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and gepants. Four mAbs have been approved: erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and eptinezumab. Gepants are small molecules that antagonize the CGRP receptor; currently only rimegepant and atogepant have been approved for migraine prevention. These new drugs have demonstrated efficacy and safety in clinical trials for both episodic and chronic migraine, and results from their real-world experience are being increasingly reported in literature. In this review, we provide an overview of anti-CGRP drugs and their placement in migraine prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Caronna
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Alpuente
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Torres-Ferrus
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yu S, Zhou J, Luo G, Xiao Z, Ettrup A, Jansson G, Florea I, Ranc K, Pozo-Rosich P. Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in patients with chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. BMC Neurol 2023; 23:441. [PMID: 38102535 PMCID: PMC10722704 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03477-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For some people with migraine, despite taking greater amounts of acute headache medication (AHM), they develop an increase in monthly headache days. This cycle of increasing headache days, and in turn AHM use, can lead to a secondary headache disorder called medication-overuse headache (MOH). Preventive medications can prevent migraine from occurring and reduce reliance on AHMs, thereby preventing the cycle of MOH. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eptinezumab to prevent migraine/headache in a mainly Asian patient population with a dual diagnosis of chronic migraine and MOH. METHODS SUNLIGHT was a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Patients aged 18-75 years with ≥ 8 migraine days/month and a diagnosis of MOH were randomly allocated (1:1) to one of two treatment groups: eptinezumab 100 mg or placebo. Monthly migraine days (MMDs) were captured using a daily electronic diary; the change from baseline in the number of MMDs over Weeks 1-12 was the primary efficacy endpoint. RESULTS Patients were randomized to eptinezumab 100 mg (n = 93) or placebo (n = 100). Over Weeks 1-12, eptinezumab reduced mean MMDs more than placebo (difference between treatments was -1.2; p = 0.1484). Differences between treatment groups with p-values below 0.05 favoring eptinezumab were observed in 3 out of the 6 key secondary endpoints. CONCLUSION All endpoints numerically favored eptinezumab treatment when compared to placebo; however, this study did not meet its primary endpoint and is therefore negative. No new safety signals were identified in this study, like previous reports that confirmed the safety and tolerability of eptinezumab treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04772742 (26/02/2021).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengyuan Yu
- Department of Neurology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Jiying Zhou
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Guogang Luo
- Neurology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zheman Xiao
- Department of Neurology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | | | | | | | | | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Neurology Department, Headache Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department de Medicina, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Melgarejo L, Caronna E, Rosell-Mirmi J, Elosua-Bayés I, Alpuente A, Torres-Ferrus M, Gallardo VJ, Pozo-Rosich P. Migraine worsening after COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination: Are we facing a nocebo effect? Eur J Neurol 2023; 30:3877-3885. [PMID: 37791410 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In clinical practice patients may report migraine worsening as a consequence of COVID-19 (either infection or vaccines), however, data in this area are lacking. We aimed to investigate the link between COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination with migraine worsening and its associated factors. METHODS An online survey was sent to migraine patients followed up in a Spanish Headache Clinic, collecting demographic data, and information regarding SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. We asked patients if they had noticed worsening of their migraine after these events and assessed concerns about infection, vaccination and migraine worsening. We also extracted data from participants' own electronic diaries (e-diaries), including 1-month data before and after their reported infection and/or vaccination. We compared participants who self-reported migraine worsening since infection or vaccination with those who did not. RESULTS Of 550 participants, 44.9% (247/550) reported having had COVID-19 at least once and 83.3% (458/550) had been vaccinated. Sixty-one patients reported migraine worsening since COVID-19 and 52 since the vaccination. Among the risk factors for perceived migraine worsening in the two settings (infection and vaccination) was concern about migraine worsening itself (infection: odds ratio [OR] 2.498 [95% CI: 1.02-6.273], p = 0.046; vaccination: OR 17.3 [95% CI: confidence interval 5.3-68], p < 0.001). e-diary information was available for 136 of the 550 patients, 38.2% (52/136) for COVID-19 and 39.7% (54/136) for vaccination. We observed no significant difference in headache frequency 1 month before and after infection or vaccination, even when comparing patients with and without self-reported migraine worsening. CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary data point to a negligible role of the infection and vaccination on migraine worsening and to the possible presence of a nocebo effect in these settings, as a remarkable proportion of patients had a clear perception of migraine worsening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Melgarejo
- Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, VHIR, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joana Rosell-Mirmi
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, VHIR, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, VHIR, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Torres-Ferrus
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, VHIR, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Víctor J Gallardo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, VHIR, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, VHIR, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lipton RB, Pozo-Rosich P, Orr SL, Reed ML, Fanning KM, Dabruzzo B, Buse DC. Impact of monthly headache days on migraine-related quality of life: Results from the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) study. Headache 2023; 63:1448-1457. [PMID: 37795746 DOI: 10.1111/head.14629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize the direct impact of monthly headache days (MHDs) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in people with migraine and the potential mediating effects of anxiety, depression, and allodynia. BACKGROUND Although the general relationship between increased migraine frequency (i.e., MHDs) and reduced HRQoL is well established, the degree to which reduced HRQoL is due to a direct effect of increased MHDs or attributable to mediating factors remains uncertain. METHODS Cross-sectional baseline data from participants with migraine who completed the Core and Comorbidities/Endophenotypes modules in the 2012-2013 US Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) study, a longitudinal web-based survey study, were analyzed. The potential contribution of depression, anxiety, and/or allodynia to the observed effects of MHDs on HRQoL as measured by the Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire version 2.1 (MSQ) was evaluated. RESULTS A total of 12,715 respondents were included in the analyses. The MSQ domain scores demonstrated progressive declines with increasing MHD categories (B = -1.23 to -0.60; p < 0.001). The observed HRQoL decrements associated with increasing MHDs were partially mediated by the presence of depression, anxiety, and allodynia. The MHD values predicted 24.0%-32.4% of the observed variation in the MSQ domains. Depression mediated 15.2%-24.3%, allodynia mediated 9.6%-16.1%, and anxiety mediated 2.3%-6.0% of the observed MHD effects on the MSQ. CONCLUSIONS Increased MHD values were associated with lower MSQ scores; the impact of MHDs on the MSQ domain scores was partially mediated by the presence of depression, anxiety, and allodynia. MHDs remain the predominant driver of the MSQ variation; moreover, most of the variation in the MSQ remains unexplained by the variables we analyzed. Future longitudinal analyses and studies may help clarify the contribution of MHDs, comorbidities, and other factors to changes in HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard B Lipton
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Research Group, VHIR, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Serena L Orr
- Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Brett Dabruzzo
- Medical Affairs (Neurosciences - Migraine), AbbVie, Illinois, North Chicago, USA
| | - Dawn C Buse
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ashina M, Mitsikostas DD, Amin FM, Kokturk P, Schankin CJ, Sahin G, Pozo-Rosich P, Dorman PJ, Nežádal T, Poole AC, Martins IP, Sumelahti ML, Ramirez Campos V, Ahn AH, Lyras L, Tassorelli C. Real-world effectiveness of fremanezumab for the preventive treatment of migraine: Interim analysis of the pan-European, prospective, observational, phase 4 PEARL study. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231214987. [PMID: 37987641 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231214987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ongoing Pan-European Real Life (PEARL) phase 4 study is evaluating fremanezumab effectiveness and safety for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine. This interim analysis reports primary, secondary and exploratory endpoints from when 500 participants completed at least six months of treatment. METHODS Adults with episodic migraine or chronic migraine maintaining daily headache diaries were enrolled upon initiation of fremanezumab. Primary endpoint: proportion of participants with ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days during the six-month period after fremanezumab initiation. Secondary endpoints: mean change from baseline across months 1-12 in monthly migraine days, acute migraine medication use, and headache-related disability. Exploratory endpoint: mean change in headache severity from baseline across months 1-12. Safety was assessed through adverse events reported. RESULTS Overall, 897 participants were enrolled and 574 included in the effectiveness analyses (episodic migraine, 25.8%; chronic migraine, 74.2%). Of participants with data available, 175/313 (55.9%) achieved ≥50% monthly migraine days reduction during the six-month period post-initiation. Across months 1-12, there were sustained reductions in mean monthly migraine days, acute medication use, disability scores, and headache severity. Few adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION PEARL interim results support the effectiveness and safety of fremanezumab for migraine prevention in a real-world population across several European countries.Trial registration: encepp.eu: EUPAS35111.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Messoud Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dimos D Mitsikostas
- First Department of Neurology, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Faisal Mohammad Amin
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Neurorehabilitation/Traumatic Brain Injury, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Christoph J Schankin
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gurdal Sahin
- Department of Clinical Sciences of Lund, Lund University, Skåneuro Neurology Clinic, Lund, Sweden
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit & Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Hospital & Research Institute, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paul J Dorman
- The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tomáš Nežádal
- Institute of Neuropsychiatric Care, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Isabel Pavão Martins
- Centro de Estudos Egas Moniz, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | | - Andrew H Ahn
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., West Chester, PA, USA
| | | | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Department of Brain & Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gómez-Dabó L, Melgarejo-Martínez L, Caronna E, Pozo-Rosich P. Headache in COVID-19 and Long COVID: to Know Facts for Clinical Practice. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2023; 23:551-560. [PMID: 37665495 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-023-01296-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Headache is one of the most frequent symptoms of the acute and post-acute phase of COVID-19. Specific epidemiology, clinical features, risk factors, pathophysiology, and treatment have been reported in these two scenarios. With this narrative review of the literature, we aim to provide updated knowledge on headache in the COVID-19 setting and give clinicians a practical approach on this topic to guide them in their clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS Headache mechanisms in COVID-19 are still poorly understood. Strong evidence is also lacking on how to best treat and manage these patients, especially those with persistent and disabling headache after COVID-19. Data are also scarce on the characteristics of headache in COVID-19 caused by the new SARS-CoV-2 (Omicron) variants and how these may influence the acute and persistent symptoms of COVID-19. Patients with pre-existing primary headache disorders remain a particularly concerning population due to their biological predisposition in suffering from headaches and the potential risk of worsening in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although there is an exponential growth of scientific evidence, studies are often controversial and focused on the first wave of the pandemic, making COVID-19 headache still a challenging matter for clinicians. New research is therefore needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Gómez-Dabó
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Melgarejo-Martínez
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Ps. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Ps. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Torres-Ferrus M, López-Veloso AC, Gonzalez-Quintanilla V, González-García N, Díaz de Teran J, Gago-Veiga A, Camiña J, Ruiz M, Mas-Sala N, Bohórquez S, Gallardo VJ, Pozo-Rosich P. The MIGREX study: Prevalence and risk factors of sexual dysfunction among migraine patients. Neurologia 2023; 38:541-549. [PMID: 37802552 DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2021.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine attacks have a high impact on daily activities. There is limited research on the burden of migraine on sexual functioning. OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in patients with migraine and its relationship with migraine features and comorbidities. METHOD This is a cross-sectional study. We included migraine patients between 18 and 60 years-old from 8 Headache Clinics in Spain. We recorded demographic data and migraine features. Patients fulfilled a survey including comorbidities, Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and a questionnaire about migraine impact on sexual activity. A K-nearest neighbor supervised learning algorithm was used to identify differences between migraine patients with and without sexual dysfunction. RESULTS We included 306 patients (85.6% women, mean age 42.3±11.1 years). A 41.8% of participants had sexual dysfunction. Sexual dysfunction was associated with being female (OR [95% CI]: 2.42 [1.17-5.00]; p<0.001), being older than 46.5 years (4.04 [2.48-6.59]; p<0.001), having chronic migraine (2.31 [1.41-3.77]; p=0.001), using preventive medication (2.45 [1.35-4.45]; p=0.004), analgesic overusing (3.51 [2.03-6.07]; p<0.001), menopause (4.18 [2.43-7.17]; p<0.001) and anxiety (2.90 [1.80-4.67]; p<0.001) and depression (6.14 [3.18-11.83]; p<0.001). However, only female gender, age, menopause and depression were the statistically significant variables selected in the model to classify migraine patients with or without sexual dysfunction (Accuracy [95% CI]: 0.75 (0.62-0.85), Kappa: 0.48, p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS Sexual dysfunction is frequent in migraine patients visited in a headache clinic. However, migraine characteristics or use of preventive medication are not directly associated with sexual dysfunction. Instead, risk factors for sexual dysfunction were female gender, higher age, menopause and depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Torres-Ferrus
- Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - A C López-Veloso
- Neurology Department, Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín University Hospital, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | | | | | - J Díaz de Teran
- Neurology Department, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Gago-Veiga
- Neurology Department, La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Camiña
- Neurology Department, Rotger Clinic, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - M Ruiz
- Neurology Department, San Juan Hospital, Alicante, Spain
| | - N Mas-Sala
- Neurology Department, Althaia Hospital, Red Asistencial Universitaria de Manresa, Spain
| | - S Bohórquez
- Neurology Department, Sabana University, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - V J Gallardo
- Neurology Department, Sabana University, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - P Pozo-Rosich
- Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
May A, Evers S, Goadsby PJ, Leone M, Manzoni GC, Pascual J, Carvalho V, Romoli M, Aleksovska K, Pozo-Rosich P, Jensen RH. European Academy of Neurology guidelines on the treatment of cluster headache. Eur J Neurol 2023; 30:2955-2979. [PMID: 37515405 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Cluster headache is a relatively rare, disabling primary headache disorder with a major impact on patients' quality of life. This work presents evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of cluster headache derived from a systematic review of the literature and consensus among a panel of experts. METHODS The databases PubMed (Medline), Science Citation Index, and Cochrane Library were screened for studies on the efficacy of interventions (last access July 2022). The findings in these studies were evaluated according to the recommendations of the European Academy of Neurology, and the level of evidence was established using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). RECOMMENDATIONS For the acute treatment of cluster headache attacks, there is a strong recommendation for oxygen (100%) with a flow of at least 12 L/min over 15 min and 6 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan. Prophylaxis of cluster headache attacks with verapamil at a daily dose of at least 240 mg (maximum dose depends on efficacy and tolerability) is recommended. Corticosteroids are efficacious in cluster headache. To reach an effect, the use of at least 100 mg prednisone (or equivalent corticosteroid) given orally or at up to 500 mg iv per day over 5 days is recommended. Lithium, topiramate, and galcanezumab (only for episodic cluster headache) are recommended as alternative treatments. Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation is efficacious in episodic but not chronic cluster headache. Greater occipital nerve block is recommended, but electrical stimulation of the greater occipital nerve is not recommended due to the side effect profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne May
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Evers
- Department of Neurology, Lindenbrunn Hospital, Coppenbrügge, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- NIHR King's CRF, SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Massimo Leone
- Neuroalgology Department, Foundation of the Carlo Besta Neurological Institute, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Julio Pascual
- Service of Neurology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria and IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Vanessa Carvalho
- Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health (Neurology), Hospital Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
- Centro de Estudos Egas Moniz, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Michele Romoli
- Neurology and Stroke Unit, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rigmor H Jensen
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Labastida-Ramírez A, Caronna E, Gollion C, Stanyer E, Dapkute A, Braniste D, Naghshineh H, Meksa L, Chkhitunidze N, Gudadze T, Pozo-Rosich P, Burstein R, Hoffmann J. Mode and site of action of therapies targeting CGRP signaling. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:125. [PMID: 37691118 PMCID: PMC10494408 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01644-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Targeting CGRP has proved to be efficacious, tolerable, and safe to treat migraine; however, many patients with migraine do not benefit from drugs that antagonize the CGRPergic system. Therefore, this review focuses on summarizing the general pharmacology of the different types of treatments currently available, which target directly or indirectly the CGRP receptor or its ligand. Moreover, the latest evidence regarding the selectivity and site of action of CGRP small molecule antagonists (gepants) and monoclonal antibodies is critically discussed. Finally, the reasons behind non-responders to anti-CGRP drugs and rationale for combining and/or switching between these therapies are addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Labastida-Ramírez
- Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK
| | - Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Universitary Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cédric Gollion
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Emily Stanyer
- Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Sleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Diana Braniste
- Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Diomid Gherman, Chișinău, Moldova
- State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Nicolae Testemițanu, Moldova
| | - Hoda Naghshineh
- Headache Department, Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Liga Meksa
- Headache Unit, Neurology and Neurosurgery Department, Riga East University Hospital Gailezers, Riga, Latvia
| | | | - Tamari Gudadze
- Department of Neurology, Christian Hospital Unna, Unna, Germany
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Universitary Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rami Burstein
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Life Science, Room 649, 3 Blackfan Circle, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Jan Hoffmann
- Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.
- NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility/SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pozo-Rosich P, Ailani J, Ashina M, Goadsby PJ, Lipton RB, Reuter U, Guo H, Schwefel B, Lu K, Boinpally R, Miceli R, De Abreu Ferreira R, McCusker E, Yu SY, Severt L, Finnegan M, Trugman JM. Atogepant for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine (PROGRESS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023; 402:775-785. [PMID: 37516125 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01049-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of atogepant for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. METHODS We did this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial at 142 clinical research sites across the USA, the UK, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, and Taiwan. Adults aged 18-80 years with a 1-year or longer history of chronic migraine were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive oral atogepant 30 mg twice a day, oral atogepant 60 mg once a day, or placebo. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in mean monthly migraine days (MMDs) across the 12-week treatment period. The primary analysis was done in the modified intent-to-treat population and included all randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose of study intervention, had an evaluable baseline period of electronic diary (eDiary) data, and had at least one evaluable post-baseline 4-week period (weeks 1-4, 5-8, and 9-12) of eDiary data during the double-blind period. The safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03855137). FINDINGS Between March 11, 2019 and Jan 20, 2022, 1489 participants were assessed for eligibility. 711 were excluded, and 778 participants were randomly assigned to atogepant 30 mg twice a day (n=257), atogepant 60 mg once a day (n=262), or placebo (n=259). Participants in the safety population were aged 18-74 years (mean 42·1 years). 459 (59%) of 773 patients were White, 677 (88%) patients were female, and 96 (12%) were male. 84 participants discontinued treatment during the trial, and 755 comprised the modified intent-to-treat population (atogepant 30 mg twice a day n=253, atogepant 60 mg once a day n=256, and placebo n=246). Baseline mean number of MMDs were 18·6 (SE 5·1) with atogepant 30 mg twice a day, 19·2 (5·3) with atogepant 60 mg once a day, and 18·9 (4·8) with placebo. Change from baseline in mean MMDs across 12 weeks was -7·5 (SE 0·4) with atogepant 30 mg twice a day, -6·9 (0·4) with atogepant 60 mg once a day, and -5·1 (0·4) with placebo. Least squares mean difference from placebo was -2·4 with atogepant 30 mg twice a day (95% CI -3·5 to -1·3; adjusted p<0·0001) and -1·8 with atogepant 60 mg once a day (-2·9 to -0·8; adjusted p=0·0009). Most common adverse events for atogepant were constipation (30 mg twice a day 28 [10·9%]; 60 mg once a day 26 [10%]; and placebo 8 [3%]) and nausea (30 mg twice a day 20 [8%]; 60 mg once a day 25 [10%]; and placebo 9 [4%]). Potentially clinically significant weight decrease (≥7% reduction at any time post-baseline) was observed in each treatment group (atogepant 30 mg twice a day 14 [6%]; atogepant 60 mg once a day 15 [6%]; and placebo 5 [2%]). INTERPRETATION Atogepant 30 mg twice a day and 60 mg once a day showed clinically relevant reductions in MMDs across 12 weeks in chronic migraine patients. Both atogepant doses were well tolerated, consistent with the known safety profile of atogepant. FUNDING Allergan (now AbbVie).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Headache & Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Jessica Ailani
- Georgetown Headache Center, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility & Headache Group, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Richard B Lipton
- Department of Neurology and the Montefiore Headache Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND This narrative review aims to broaden our understanding of the epidemiology, burden and clinical spectrum of cluster headache based on updated findings with a global perspective. METHODS We conducted a literature search on the following topics: (a) epidemiology; (b) burden: quality of life, disability, economic burden, job-related burden and suicidality; and (c) clinical spectrum: male predominance and its changes, age, pre-cluster and pre-attack symptoms, aura, post-drome, attack characteristics (location, severity, duration and associated symptoms), bout characteristics (attack frequency, bout duration and bout frequency), circadian and seasonal rhythmicity and disease course. RESULTS New large-scale population-based reports have suggested a lower prevalence than previous estimations. The impact of cluster headache creates a significant burden in terms of the quality of life, disability, economic and job-related burdens and suicidality. Several studies have reported decreasing male-to-female ratios and a wide age range at disease onset. The non-headache phases of cluster headache, including pre-cluster, pre-attack and postictal symptoms, have recently been revisited. The latest data regarding attack characteristics, bout characteristics, and circadian and seasonal rhythmicity from different countries have shown variability among bouts, attacks, individuals and ethnicities. Studies on the disease course of cluster headache have shown typical characteristics of attacks or bouts that decrease with time. CONCLUSIONS Cluster headache may be more than a "trigeminal autonomic headache" because it involves complex central nervous system phenomena. The spectrum of attacks and bouts is wider than previously recognised. Cluster headache is a dynamic disorder that evolves or regresses over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Ae Kim
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - So Youn Choi
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Departament Medicina, Universtitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mi Ji Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Buse DC, Pozo-Rosich P, Dupont-Benjamin L, Balkaran BL, Lee L, Jauregui A, Gandhi P, Parikh M, Reuter U. Impact of headache frequency and preventive medication failure on quality of life, functioning, and costs among individuals with migraine across several European countries: need for effective preventive treatment. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:115. [PMID: 37612633 PMCID: PMC10464178 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01655-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data are limited regarding the combined impact of headache frequency and failure of preventive medication (efficacy and/or tolerability) on the humanistic/economic burden of migraine. METHODS A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of 2020 National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS) data was conducted. An opt-in online survey identified adults in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and United Kingdom with self-reported physician-diagnosed migraine. Participants with ≥ 4 monthly headache days (MHDs) were stratified by prior preventive medication use/failure (preventive naive; 0-1 failure; ≥ 2 failures). Quality-of-life and economic outcomes were compared among groups using generalized linear modeling. RESULTS Among individuals with ≥ 4 MHDs (n = 1106), the NHWS identified 298 (27%) with ≥ 2 failures, 308 (28%) with 0-1 failure, and 500 (45%) as preventive naive. Individuals with ≥ 2 failures versus preventive-naive individuals had significantly lower scores on the 12-Item Short Form Survey Physical Component Summary (42.2 vs 44.1; P < 0.005), numerically higher scores on the Mental Component Summary (39.5 vs 38.5; P = 0.145), significantly higher scores on the Migraine Disability Assessment (39.1 vs 34.0; P < 0.05), and significantly higher prevalence of depression symptoms (62% vs 47%; P < 0.001) and anxiety symptoms (42% vs 31%; P < 0.01). The ≥ 2 failures group versus the preventive-naive group also had significantly more functional impairment as assessed by mean numbers of migraine-specific missed work days (7.8 vs 4.3) and household activities days (14.3 vs 10.6) in the past 6 months (P < 0.001) as well as the prevalence of absenteeism (19% vs 13%), overall work impairment (53% vs 42%), and activity impairment (53% vs 47%) (all P < 0.05). Emergency department visits (0.7 vs 0.5; P = 0.001) and hospitalizations (0.5 vs 0.3; P < 0.001) in the past 6 months were significantly higher in the ≥ 2 failures group versus the preventive-naive group, while indirect costs (€13,720 vs €11,282) and the proportion of individuals with non-adherence during the past 7 days (73% vs 64%) were numerically higher. CONCLUSIONS Increased burden, quality-of-life impairment, and functional impairment exist among individuals with migraine experiencing ≥ 4 MHDs and more treatment failures. While cause and directionality cannot be determined, these results suggest the need for effective preventive migraine treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn C Buse
- Albert Einstein School of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Research Group, VHIR, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Uwe Reuter
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Vila-Pueyo M, Gliga O, Gallardo VJ, Pozo-Rosich P. The Role of Glial Cells in Different Phases of Migraine: Lessons from Preclinical Studies. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:12553. [PMID: 37628733 PMCID: PMC10454125 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241612553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a complex and debilitating neurological disease that affects 15% of the population worldwide. It is defined by the presence of recurrent severe attacks of disabling headache accompanied by other debilitating neurological symptoms. Important advancements have linked the trigeminovascular system and the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide to migraine pathophysiology, but the mechanisms underlying its pathogenesis and chronification remain unknown. Glial cells are essential for the correct development and functioning of the nervous system and, due to its implication in neurological diseases, have been hypothesised to have a role in migraine. Here we provide a narrative review of the role of glia in different phases of migraine through the analysis of preclinical studies. Current evidence shows that astrocytes and microglia are involved in the initiation and propagation of cortical spreading depolarization, the neurophysiological correlate of migraine aura. Furthermore, satellite glial cells within the trigeminal ganglia are implicated in the initiation and maintenance of orofacial pain, suggesting a role in the headache phase of migraine. Moreover, microglia in the trigeminocervical complex are involved in central sensitization, suggesting a role in chronic migraine. Taken altogether, glial cells have emerged as key players in migraine pathogenesis and chronification and future therapeutic strategies could be focused on targeting them to reduce the burden of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Vila-Pueyo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 119-129 Passeig de la Vall d’Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Otilia Gliga
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 119-129 Passeig de la Vall d’Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Víctor José Gallardo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 119-129 Passeig de la Vall d’Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 119-129 Passeig de la Vall d’Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
González R, Aymerich FX, Alberich M, Caronna E, Gallardo VJ, Pozo-Rosich P, Rovira À, Pareto D. Estimation of the density of veins from susceptibility-weighted imaging by using Mamdani fuzzy-type rule-based system. Investigating the neurovascular coupling in migraine. Neuroimage Clin 2023; 39:103489. [PMID: 37611372 PMCID: PMC10466899 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE An impaired neurovascular coupling has been described as a possible player in neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. Migraine is a recurrent and incapacitating disorder that starts early in life and has shown neurovascular coupling abnormalities. Despite its high prevalence, the physiology and underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. In this context, new biomarkers from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are needed to bring new knowledge into the field. The aim of this study was to determine the vein density from Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging (SWI) MRI, in subjects with migraine and healthy controls; and to assess whether it relates to Resting-State functional MRI (RS-fMRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS The cohort included 30 healthy controls and 70 subjects with migraine (26 episodic, 44 chronic) who underwent a brain 3.0 T MRI. Clinical characteristics were also collected. Maps of density of veins were generated based on a Mamdani Fuzzy-Type Rule-Based System from the SWI MRI. Mean values of vein density were obtained in grey (GM) and white matter (WM) Freesurfer lobar parcellations. The Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuations (ALFF) image was calculated for the RS-fMRI, and the mean values over the parcellated GM lobes were estimated. Differences between groups were assessed through and analysis of variance (age, sex, education and anxiety as covariates; p < 0.05), followed by post-hoc comparisons. Associations were run between clinical and MRI-derived variables. RESULTS When comparing the density of veins in GM, no differences between groups were found, neither associations with clinical variables. The density of veins was significantly higher in the WM of the occipital lobe for subjects with chronic migraine compared to controls (30%, p < 0.05). WM vein density in either frontal, temporal or cingulate regions was associated with clinical variables such as headache days, disability scores, and cognitive impairment (r between 0.25 and 0.41; p < 0.05). Mean values of ALFF did not differ significantly between controls and subjects with migraine. Strong significant associations between vein density and ALFF measures were obtained in most GM lobes for healthy subjects (r between 0.50 and 0.67; p < 0.05), instead, vein density in WM was significantly associated with ALFF for subjects with migraine (r between 0.32 and 0.58; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Results point towards an increase in vein density in subjects with migraine, when compared to healthy controls. In addition, the association between GM vein density and ALFF found in healthy subjects was lost in migraine. Taken together, these results support the idea of abnormalities in the neurovascular coupling in migraine. Quantitative SWI MRI indicators in migraine might be an interesting target that may contribute to its comprehension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R González
- Neuroradiology Group, Vall Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F X Aymerich
- Neuroradiology Group, Vall Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Radiology Department (IDI), Vall Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Automatic Control Department (ESAII), Univesitat Politècnica de Catalunya Barcelona Tech, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Alberich
- Neuroradiology Group, Vall Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Radiology Department (IDI), Vall Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E Caronna
- Headache and Craniofacial Pain Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - V J Gallardo
- Headache and Craniofacial Pain Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Pozo-Rosich
- Headache and Craniofacial Pain Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - À Rovira
- Neuroradiology Group, Vall Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Radiology Department (IDI), Vall Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - D Pareto
- Neuroradiology Group, Vall Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Radiology Department (IDI), Vall Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Marti-Marca A, Vilà-Balló A, Cerda-Company X, Ikumi N, Torres-Ferrus M, Caronna E, Gallardo VJ, Alpuente A, Torralba Cuello M, Soto-Faraco S, Pozo-Rosich P. Exploring sensory sensitivity, cortical excitability, and habituation in episodic migraine, as a function of age and disease severity, using the pattern-reversal task. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:104. [PMID: 37545005 PMCID: PMC10405481 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01618-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a cyclic, neurosensory disorder characterized by recurrent headaches and altered sensory processing. The latter is manifested in hypersensitivity to visual stimuli, measured with questionnaires and sensory thresholds, as well as in abnormal cortical excitability and a lack of habituation, assessed with visual evoked potentials elicited by pattern-reversal stimulation. Here, the goal was to determine whether factors such as age and/or disease severity may exert a modulatory influence on sensory sensitivity, cortical excitability, and habituation. METHODS Two similar experiments were carried out, the first comparing 24 young, episodic migraine patients and 28 healthy age- and gender-matched controls and the second 36 middle-aged, episodic migraine patients and 30 healthy age- and gender-matched controls. A neurologist confirmed the diagnoses. Migraine phases were obtained using eDiaries. Sensory sensitivity was assessed with the Sensory Perception Quotient and group comparisons were carried out. We obtained pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials and calculated the N1-P1 Peak-to-Peak amplitude. Two linear mixed-effects models were fitted to these data. The first model had Block (first block, last block) and Group (patients, controls) as fixed factors, whereas the second model had Trial (all trials) and Group as fixed factors. Participant was included as a random factor in both. N1-P1 first block amplitude was used to assess cortical excitability and habituation was defined as a decrease of N1-P1 amplitude across Blocks/Trials. Both experiments were performed interictally. RESULTS The final samples consisted of 18 patients with episodic migraine and 27 headache-free controls (first experiment) and 19 patients and 29 controls (second experiment). In both experiments, patients reported increased visual hypersensitivity on the Sensory Perception Quotient as compared to controls. Regarding N1-P1 peak-to-peak data, there was no main effect of Group, indicating no differences in cortical excitability between groups. Finally, significant main effects of both Block and Trial were found indicating habituation in both groups, regardless of age and headache frequency. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study yielded evidence for significant hypersensitivity in patients but no significant differences in either habituation or cortical excitability, as compared to headache-free controls. Although the alterations in patients may be less pronounced than originally anticipated they demonstrate the need for the definition and standardization of optimal methodological parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Marti-Marca
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Adrià Vilà-Balló
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xim Cerda-Company
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nara Ikumi
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Torres-Ferrus
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo Caronna
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victor J Gallardo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Alpuente
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mireia Torralba Cuello
- Multisensory Research Group, Center for Brain and Cognition, Pompeu Fabra University, 08005, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Salvador Soto-Faraco
- Multisensory Research Group, Center for Brain and Cognition, Pompeu Fabra University, 08005, Barcelona, Spain
- Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), 08010, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mollan SP, Fraser CL, Digre KB, Diener HC, Lipton RB, Juhler M, Miller NR, Pozo-Rosich P, Togha M, Brock K, Dinkin MJ, Chan CKM, Tassorelli C, Sinclair AJ, Terwindt GM, Jensen RH. Guidelines of the International Headache Society for Controlled Clinical Trials in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231197118. [PMID: 37661711 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231197118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
The quality of clinical trials is essential to advance treatment, inform regulatory decisions and meta-analysis. With the increased incidence of idiopathic intracranial hypertension and the emergence of clinical trials for novel therapies in this condition, the International Headache Society Guidelines for Controlled Clinical Trials in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension aims to establish guidelines for designing state-of-the-art controlled clinical trials for idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan P Mollan
- Neuro-ophthalmology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Translational Brain Science, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Clare L Fraser
- Save Sight Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kathleen B Digre
- Neuro-ophthalmology Division, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Hans-Christoph Diener
- Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie undEpidemiologie (IMIBE), Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Richard B Lipton
- The Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, and the Montefiore Headache Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Marianne Juhler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Neil R Miller
- Wilmer Eye Institute and Departments of Ophthalmology, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mansoureh Togha
- Headache Department, Iranian Centre of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Headache Department, Neurology Ward, Sina Hospital, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kristian Brock
- Cancer Research Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Marc J Dinkin
- Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Carmen K M Chan
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Unit of Translational Neurovascular Research, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alex J Sinclair
- Translational Brain Science, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gisela M Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rigmor H Jensen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
de Boer I, Ambrosini A, Halker Singh RB, Baykan B, Buse DC, Tassorelli C, Jensen RH, Pozo-Rosich P, Terwindt GM. Harassment in the headache field: a global web-based cross-sectional survey. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231193099. [PMID: 37652444 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231193099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Matters of workplace harassment are an important issue. This issue needs to be recognized and studied to prevent occurrences. These important sensitive areas of effective workplace management are increasingly gaining more interest. We aimed to identify the prevalence of workplace sexual, verbal and physical harassment among headache professionals. METHODS We adopted a cross‑sectional exploratory survey approach with quantitative design. The survey was distributed electronically among headache healthcare and research professionals globally through the International Headache Society (IHS). RESULTS Data were obtained from 579 respondents (55.3%; 320/579 women). A large percentage of respondents (46.6%; 270/579) had experienced harassment; specifically, 16.1% (93/578) reported sexual harassment, 40.4% (234/579) verbal harassment and 5.5% (32/579) physical harassment. Women were almost seven times more likely to experience sexual harassment compared to men (odds ratio = 6.8; 95% confidence interval = 3.5-13.2). Although women did also more frequently report other types of harassment, this was not statistically significant (odds ratio = 1.4; 95% confidence interval = 1.0-2.0). CONCLUSIONS Lifetime exposure to workplace harassment is prevalent among headache professionals, especially in women. The present study uncovers a widespread issue and calls for strategies to be implemented for building a healthy and safe workplace environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene de Boer
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Betül Baykan
- Department of Neurology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Dawn C Buse
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Headache Science & Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS C. Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Rigmor H Jensen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Centre, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gisela M Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Alpuente A, Torre-Sune A, Caronna E, Gine-Cipres E, Torres-Ferrús M, Pozo-Rosich P. Impact of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies on migraine attack accompanying symptoms: A real-world evidence study. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231177636. [PMID: 37555331 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231177636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trials on anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies poorly investigated their impact on migraine accompanying symptoms. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of basal accompanying symptoms on anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies treatment response and their evolution after six months of treatment in migraine patients. METHODS Patients with migraine diagnosis seen in the Headache Clinic and treated with erenumab, galcanezumab or fremanezumab were prospectively recruited. They completed a daily eDiary which provided data on headache frequency and the following accompanying symptoms of each day: photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, dizziness, and aura. Patients were classified as responders or non-responders based on 50% or greater reduction in headache days per month at month 6 (≥50% response rate). Accompanying symptoms ratios based on headache days per month were assessed per patient at baseline and after three and six months. Comparisons for basal characteristics, basal accompanying symptoms ratios and their evolution after six months between responders and non-responders were performed. RESULTS One hundred and fifty-eight patients were included, 44% (69/158) showed ≥50% response rate after six months. A significant reduction in headache days per month in both groups was found at month 6 (-9.4 days/month in ≥50% response rate group; p < 0.001, -2.2 days/month in <50% response rate group; p = 0.004). Additionally, significant decreases in photophobia (-19.5%, p < 0.001), phonophobia (-12.1%, p = 0.010) and aura ratios (-25.1%, p = 0.008) were found in ≥50% response rate group. No statistically significant reductions were found in nausea and dizziness in any group since their reduction was correlated with the decrease in headache days per month. Higher photophobia ratios at baseline were predictive of an increased response between months 3 and 6 (Incidence Risk Ratio = 0.928, p = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS The days per month with photophobia, phonophobia and aura decreased at a higher rate than headache days per month after six months in the ≥50% response group. Higher photophobia ratios were associated with higher response rates between three and six months. It could indicate an involvement of peripheral CGRP in photophobia as well as a central modulation of migraine through these treatments which mainly act on the periphery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Torre-Sune
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eulalia Gine-Cipres
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Torres-Ferrús
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Mitsikostas DD, Waeber C, Sanchez-Del-Rio M, Raffaelli B, Ashina H, Maassen van den Brink A, Andreou A, Pozo-Rosich P, Rapoport A, Ashina M, Moskowitz MA. The 5-HT 1F receptor as the target of ditans in migraine - from bench to bedside. Nat Rev Neurol 2023:10.1038/s41582-023-00842-x. [PMID: 37438431 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-023-00842-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
Migraine is a leading cause of disability in more than one billion people worldwide, yet it remains universally underappreciated, even by individuals with the condition. Among other shortcomings, current treatments (often repurposed agents) have limited efficacy and potential adverse effects, leading to low treatment adherence. After the introduction of agents that target the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway, another new drug class, the ditans - a group of selective serotonin 5-HT1F receptor agonists - has just reached the international market. Here, we review preclinical studies from the late 1990s and more recent clinical research that contributed to the development of the ditans and led to their approval for acute migraine treatment by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimos D Mitsikostas
- 1st Neurology Department, Eginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
| | - Christian Waeber
- School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | | | - Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Håkan Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Brain and Spinal Cord Injury, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Antoinette Maassen van den Brink
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anna Andreou
- Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Headache Centre, Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, King's Health Partners, London, UK
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alan Rapoport
- Department of Neurology, The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael A Moskowitz
- Departments of Radiology and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Muñoz-Vendrell A, Campoy S, Caronna E, Alpuente A, Torres-Ferrus M, Nieves Castellanos C, Olivier M, Campdelacreu J, Prat J, Camiña Muñiz J, Molina Martínez FJ, Mínguez-Olaondo A, Ruibal Salgado M, Santos Lasaosa S, Navarro Pérez MP, Morollón N, López Bravo A, Cano Sánchez LM, García-Sánchez SM, García-Ull J, Rubio-Flores L, Gonzalez-Martinez A, Quintas S, Echavarría Íñiguez A, Gil Luque S, Castro-Sánchez MV, Adell Ortega V, García Alhama J, Berrocal-Izquierdo N, Belvís R, Díaz-Insa S, Pozo-Rosich P, Huerta-Villanueva M. Effectiveness and safety of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in patients over 65 years: a real-life multicentre analysis of 162 patients. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:63. [PMID: 37268904 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01585-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies have shown notable effectiveness and tolerability in migraine patients; however, data on their use in elderly patients is still lacking, as clinical trials have implicit age restrictions and real-world evidence is scarce. In this study, we aimed to describe the safety and effectiveness of erenumab, galcanezumab and fremanezumab in migraine patients over 65 years old in real-life. METHODS In this observational real-life study, a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 18 different headache units in Spain was performed. Migraine patients who started treatment with any anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody after the age of 65 years were included. Primary endpoints were reduction in monthly migraine days after 6 months of treatment and the presence of adverse effects. Secondary endpoints were reductions in headache and medication intake frequencies by months 3 and 6, response rates, changes in patient-reported outcomes and reasons for discontinuation. As a subanalysis, reduction in monthly migraine days and proportion of adverse effects were also compared among the three monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS A total of 162 patients were included, median age 68 years (range 65-87), 74.1% women. 42% had dyslipidaemia, 40.3% hypertension, 8% diabetes, and 6.2% previous cardiovascular ischaemic disease. The reduction in monthly migraine days at month 6 was 10.1 ± 7.3 days. A total of 25.3% of patients presented adverse effects, all of them mild, with only two cases of blood pressure increase. Headache and medication intake frequencies were significantly reduced, and patient-reported outcomes were improved. The proportions of responders were 68%, 57%, 33% and 9% for reductions in monthly migraine days ≥ 30%, ≥ 50%, ≥ 75% and 100%, respectively. A total of 72.8% of patients continued with the treatment after 6 months. The reduction in migraine days was similar for the different anti-CGRP treatments, but fewer adverse effects were detected with fremanezumab (7.7%). CONCLUSIONS Anti-CGRP mAbs are safe and effective treatments in migraine patients over 65 years old in real-life clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Muñoz-Vendrell
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de La Feixa Llarga S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Sergio Campoy
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de La Feixa Llarga S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Viladecans-IDIBELL, Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Torres-Ferrus
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Marina Olivier
- Unidad de Cefaleas. Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitari I Politécnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaume Campdelacreu
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de La Feixa Llarga S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Prat
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de La Feixa Llarga S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Camiña Muñiz
- Unidad de Cefaleas. Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma, Spain
- Consulta Monográfica de Cefaleas. Clínica Rotger Quirónsalud, Palma, Spain
| | | | - Ane Mínguez-Olaondo
- Neurology Department, Donostia University Hospital-OSAKIDETZA, San Sebastián, Spain
- ATHENEA Neuroclinics, Policlínica Gipuzkoa Grupo Quironsalud, Donostia, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain
- Neuroscience Area, Biodonostia Research Institute, San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Marta Ruibal Salgado
- Neurology Department, Donostia University Hospital-OSAKIDETZA, San Sebastián, Spain
- Neuroscience Area, Biodonostia Research Institute, San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Sonia Santos Lasaosa
- Unidad de Cefaleas. Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, IIS Aragon, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - María Pilar Navarro Pérez
- Unidad de Cefaleas. Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, IIS Aragon, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Noemí Morollón
- Unidad de Cefaleas Y Neuralgias. Servicio de Neurología. Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alba López Bravo
- Unidad de Cefaleas. Sección de Neurología, Hospital Reina Sofía. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón (IIS-A), Tudela, Spain
| | - Luis Miguel Cano Sánchez
- Servicio de Neurología. Hospital Sant Joan Despí. Consorci Sanitari Integral, Sant Joan Despí, Spain
| | | | - Jésica García-Ull
- Unidad de Cefaleas. Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain
| | - Laura Rubio-Flores
- Servicio de Neurología. Hospital Universitario General de Villalba, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alicia Gonzalez-Martinez
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa E Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Madrid, Spain
| | - Sonia Quintas
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa E Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Sendoa Gil Luque
- Servicio de Neurología. Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain
| | | | - Vanesa Adell Ortega
- Servei de Neurologia. Consorci Sanitari de L'Alt Penedès-Garraf, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Robert Belvís
- Unidad de Cefaleas Y Neuralgias. Servicio de Neurología. Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Samuel Díaz-Insa
- Unidad de Cefaleas. Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitari I Politécnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mariano Huerta-Villanueva
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de La Feixa Llarga S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Viladecans-IDIBELL, Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ashina M, Lanteri-Minet M, Ettrup A, Christoffersen CL, Josiassen MK, Phul R, Sperling B, Pozo-Rosich P. Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab for migraine prevention in patients with prior preventive treatment failures: subgroup analysis of the randomized, placebo-controlled DELIVER study. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231170807. [PMID: 37125484 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231170807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a disabling neurological disease adversely affecting many aspects of life. Most patients are still required to have failed several older oral preventive therapies before being reimbursed for a preventive, migraine-specific anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide treatment. In the 24-week placebo-controlled portion of DELIVER, eptinezumab was shown to reduce migraine frequency and resulted in higher migraine responder rates compared with placebo in patients with two to four previous preventive treatment failures. This subgroup analysis assessed if demographic or clinical characteristics were associated with differences in preventive benefits. METHODS Migraine frequency reductions and responder rates (i.e., the proportion of patients reaching a ≥50% and ≥75% reduction in monthly migraine days relative to baseline) were determined in the total population and predefined subgroups by sex, age, migraine frequency (chronic migraine, episodic migraine, high-frequency episodic migraine, low-frequency episodic migraine), medication overuse, medication-overuse headache, and previous preventive treatment failures (2, >2). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in monthly migraine days over weeks 1-12. RESULTS Eptinezumab 100 and 300 mg reduced monthly migraine days more than placebo over weeks 1-12 (-4.8 and -5.3 vs -2.1, respectively; p < 0.0001). In most subgroups, eptinezumab-treated patients demonstrated larger monthly migraine days reductions from baseline over weeks 1-12 than patients receiving placebo, with reductions maintained or increased over weeks 13-24. For ≥50% and ≥75% migraine responder rates, the odds ratios versus placebo all numerically favored eptinezumab. CONCLUSION Eptinezumab had larger monthly migraine days reductions and higher responder rates than placebo across clinically relevant subgroups showing that, across different demographic populations and clinical characteristics, eptinezumab is effective in patients with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04418765).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michel Lanteri-Minet
- Pain Department and FHU InovPain, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France
- INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain, Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department de Medicina, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Torres-Ferrús M, Gallardo VJ, Alpuente A, Caronna E, Giné-Ciprés E, Pozo-Rosich P. Patterns of response to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies during first 6-months of treatment in resistant migraine patients: impact on outcome. Eur J Neurol 2023. [PMID: 37038303 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The response pattern to monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP MAbs) shown in migraine prevention clinical trials is not always reproducible at an individual-level. OBJECTIVE To describe patterns of start and consistency of the response to anti-CGRP MAbs during first six months of treatment and the association to baseline clinical characteristics METHODS: This is a prospective clinical cohort observational study. We included migraine patients treated with erenumab or galcanezumab evaluated at baseline and after three and six months (M3-M6) of treatment. The response was categorized according to reduction in monthly headache days (MHD): Sustained-response (SustainedR, ≥50% at M3 and M6); Short-Response (ShortR, M3≥50% and M6<50%), Later-Response (LaterR, M3<50% and M6≥50%); Limited-Response (LimitedR, 25-50% at M3 and M6) and No-Response (NoR, <25% at M3 and M6). Response patterns were compared at baseline and with outcome variables at M3 and M6. RESULTS We included 357 patients with a headache frequency of 21.0(16.0, 28.0) MHD and 84.0% (300/357) were chronic migraine. The distribution according to response pattern was: 37.0% (110/297) Sustained-Response, 16.8% (50/297) Later-Response, 10.4% (31/297) Short-Response, 22.6% (67/297) Limited-Response and 13.1% showed No-Response (39/297). Sustained-R and Later-R groups showed statistically significant anxiety and depression score reduction at M3 and M6 compared to other groups. CONCLUSION Initial response to anti-CGRP MAbs is not consistent in all patients. Persistence of anxiety and depression might be associated with lower response rates at month 6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Torres-Ferrús
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victor J Gallardo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eulalia Giné-Ciprés
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ashina M, Lanteri-Minet M, Pozo-Rosich P, Ettrup A, Laurberg Christoffersen C, Sperling B, Defawe Rajca C. Eptinezumab dans la prophylaxie de la migraine chez les patients en échec à 2–4 traitements antérieurs : analyse en sous population de l’étude DELIVER. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2023.01.081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
|
39
|
Haghdoost F, Puledda F, Garcia-Azorin D, Huessler EM, Messina R, Pozo-Rosich P. Evaluating the efficacy of CGRP mAbs and gepants for the preventive treatment of migraine: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 3 randomised controlled trials. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231159366. [PMID: 36855951 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231159366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several novel treatments targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway have been developed for migraine. We evaluated the efficacy of these medications, including atogepant, rimegepant, erenumab, eptinezumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab, for the prevention of migraine via network meta-analysis. METHODS Databases, including MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane central, were systematically reviewed, and all eligible phase 3 randomised controlled trials were included. RESULTS Nineteen studies (n = 14,584 participants) were included. Studies included episodic (n = 11) and chronic (n = 4) migraine or both (n = 4). All interventions, except for eptinzumab 30 mg, significantly reduced mean monthly migraine days compared to placebo. All medications had a higher ≥50% responder rate than placebo and results were statistically significant in those with the subcutaneous or intravenous route of administrations, but not with the oral one. All medications significantly reduced mean monthly headache days, although no data for this outcome was available for rimegepant, and mean monthly acute medication days, with no data for eptinezumab. CONCLUSION The results show that medications targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide were effective in preventing migraine compared to placebo. Considering limitations of single studies, different populations such as episodic and chronic migraine, and the absence of head-to-head trials, all novel treatments decreased mean monthly migraine and headache days, and showed higher 50%, 75% and 100% responder rates than placebo.Trial registration: PROSPERO registration: CRD42022310579.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faraidoon Haghdoost
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Francesca Puledda
- Headache Group, Wolfson CARD, SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, National Institute for Health Research-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Garcia-Azorin
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y Leon, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Eva-Maria Huessler
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Roberta Messina
- Neuroimaging Research Unit and Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit and Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron and VHIR, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rovira-Simon J, Sales-i-Coll M, Pozo-Rosich P, Hueto-Madrid JA, Paradell RC, Aguilar AODE, Carbonell-Cobo M, de Castro R, Shaw G. The Green Surgical Block 4.0: Automation of the operating theatre's climate conditions through a real-time patient-flow solution. Future Healthc J 2023; 10:46-49. [PMID: 37786502 PMCID: PMC10538689 DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2022-0142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
The energy consumed by surgery units constitutes a staggering part of the overall healthcare carbon footprint. Partly due to the demanding climate conditions necessitated by operating theatres (OTs), energy is also wasted because of poorly managed heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems (HVACs) that consume up to 57% of the total energy used in a hospital. With their goal of optimising OTs' performance and reducing patient waiting lists, heads of surgery units worldwide do not dare to risk cancelling scheduled surgery because of problems with the OT environment conditions (ie temperature, humidity, pressure). Current solutions are monolithic, complex and completely disconnected from healthcare logic, failing to take into account the idiosyncrasy of hospitals. This article presents an innovation that uses real-time patient flow data to automate and optimise the OT's climate conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Juan Antonio Hueto-Madrid
- Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain, and professor of surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lipton RB, Pozo-Rosich P, Blumenfeld AM, Li Y, Severt L, Stokes JT, Creutz L, Gandhi P, Dodick D. Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial. Neurology 2023; 100:e764-e777. [PMID: 36396451 PMCID: PMC9984220 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000201568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist atogepant is indicated for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine. We evaluated changes in patient-reported outcomes with atogepant in adults with migraine. METHODS In this phase 3, 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial (ADVANCE), adults with 4-14 migraine days per month received atogepant (10, 30, or 60 mg) once daily or placebo. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ) version 2.1 Role Function-Restrictive (RFR) domain at week 12 and mean monthly Activity Impairment in Migraine-Diary (AIM-D) Performance of Daily Activities (PDA) and Physical Impairment (PI) domains across the 12-week treatment period. Exploratory endpoints included change in MSQ Role Function-Preventive (RFP) and Emotional Function (EF) domains; AIM-D total scores; and change in Headache Impact Test (HIT)-6 scores. RESULTS Of 910 participants randomized, 873 comprised the modified intent-to-treat population (atogepant: 10 mg [n = 214]; 30 mg [n = 223]; and 60 mg [n = 222]; placebo [n = 214]). All atogepant groups demonstrated significantly greater improvements vs placebo in MSQ RFR that exceeded minimum clinically meaningful between-group difference (3.2 points) at week 12 (least-square mean difference [LSMD] vs placebo: 10 mg [9.9]; 30 mg [10.1]; 60 mg [10.8]; all p < 0.0001). LSMDs in monthly AIM-D PDA and PI scores across the 12-week treatment period improved significantly for the atogepant 30 (PDA: -2.54; p = 0.0003; PI: -1.99; and p = 0.0011) and 60 mg groups (PDA: -3.32; p < 0.0001; PI: -2.46; p < 0.0001), but not for the 10 mg group (PDA: -1.19; p = 0.086; PI: -1.08; p = 0.074). In exploratory analyses, atogepant 30 and 60 mg were associated with nominal improvements in MSQ RFP and EF domains, other AIM-D outcomes, and HIT-6 scores at the earliest time point (week 4) and throughout the 12-week treatment period. Results varied for atogepant 10 mg. DISCUSSION Atogepant 30 and 60 mg produced significant improvements in key patient-reported outcomes including MSQ-RFR scores and both AIM-D domains. Nominal improvements also occurred for other MSQ domains and HIT-6, reinforcing the beneficial effects of atogepant as a new treatment for migraine prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03777059. Submitted: December 13, 2018; First patient enrolled: December 14, 2018. CLINICALTRIALS gov/ct2/show/NCT03777059. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class II evidence that daily atogepant is associated with improvements in health-related quality-of-life measures in patients with 4-14 migraine days per month.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ye Li
- From the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and the Montefiore Headache Center (R.B.L.), Bronx, NY; Headache Unit, Neurology Department (P.P.-R.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Headache Research Group, VHIR (P.P.-R.), Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Headache Center of Southern California (A.M.B.), Carlsbad, CA; AbbVie (Y.L., L.S., J.T.S., P.G.), Madison, NJ; Peloton Advantage LLC, an OPEN Health Company (L.C.), Parsippany, NJ; and Department of Neurology (D.W.D.), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Gallardo VJ, Gómez-Galván JB, Asskour L, Torres-Ferrús M, Alpuente A, Caronna E, Pozo-Rosich P. A study of differential microRNA expression profile in migraine: the microMIG exploratory study. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:11. [PMID: 36797674 PMCID: PMC9936672 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01542-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies have described potential microRNA (miRNA) biomarkers associated with migraine, but studies are scarcely reproducible primarily due to the heterogeneous variability of participants. Increasing evidence shows that disease-related intrinsic factors together with lifestyle (environmental factors), influence epigenetic mechanisms and in turn, diseases. Hence, the main objective of this exploratory study was to find differentially expressed miRNAs (DE miRNA) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of patients with migraine compared to healthy controls in a well-controlled homogeneous cohort of non-menopausal women. METHODS Patients diagnosed with migraine according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3) and healthy controls without familial history of headache disorders were recruited. All participants completed a very thorough questionnaire and structured-interview in order to control for environmental factors. RNA was extracted from PBMC and a microarray system (GeneChip miRNA 4.1 Array chip, Affymetrix) was used to determine the miRNA profiles between study groups. Principal components analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis were performed to study samples distribution and random forest (RF) algorithms were computed for the classification task. To evaluate the stability of the results and the prediction error rate, a bootstrap (.632 + rule) was run through all the procedure. Finally, a functional enrichment analysis of selected targets was computed through protein-protein interaction networks. RESULTS After RF classification, three DE miRNA distinguished study groups in a very homogeneous female cohort, controlled by factors such as demographics (age and BMI), life-habits (physical activity, caffeine and alcohol consumptions), comorbidities and clinical features associated to the disease: miR-342-3p, miR-532-3p and miR-758-5p. Sixty-eight target genes were predicted which were linked mainly to enriched ion channels and signaling pathways, neurotransmitter and hormone homeostasis, infectious diseases and circadian entrainment. CONCLUSIONS A 3-miRNA (miR-342-3p, miR-532-3p and miR-758-5p) novel signature has been found differentially expressed between controls and patients with migraine. Enrichment analysis showed that these pathways are closely associated with known migraine pathophysiology, which could lead to the first reliable epigenetic biomarker set. Further studies should be performed to validate these findings in a larger and more heterogeneous sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V. J. Gallardo
- grid.430994.30000 0004 1763 0287Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J. B. Gómez-Galván
- grid.430994.30000 0004 1763 0287Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L. Asskour
- grid.430994.30000 0004 1763 0287Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M. Torres-Ferrús
- grid.430994.30000 0004 1763 0287Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain ,grid.411083.f0000 0001 0675 8654Neurology Department, Headache Unit, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A. Alpuente
- grid.430994.30000 0004 1763 0287Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain ,grid.411083.f0000 0001 0675 8654Neurology Department, Headache Unit, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E. Caronna
- grid.430994.30000 0004 1763 0287Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain ,grid.411083.f0000 0001 0675 8654Neurology Department, Headache Unit, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P. Pozo-Rosich
- grid.430994.30000 0004 1763 0287Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain ,grid.411083.f0000 0001 0675 8654Neurology Department, Headache Unit, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Altamura C, Ornello R, Ahmed F, Negro A, Miscio AM, Santoro A, Alpuente A, Russo A, Silvestro M, Cevoli S, Brunelli N, Grazzi L, Baraldi C, Guerzoni S, Andreou AP, Lambru G, Frattale I, Kamm K, Ruscheweyh R, Russo M, Torelli P, Filatova E, Latysheva N, Gryglas-Dworak A, Straburzynski M, Butera C, Colombo B, Filippi M, Pozo-Rosich P, Martelletti P, Sacco S, Vernieri F. OnabotulinumtoxinA in elderly patients with chronic migraine: insights from a real-life European multicenter study. J Neurol 2023; 270:986-994. [PMID: 36326890 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11457-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although migraine prevalence decreases with aging, some older patients still suffer from chronic migraine (CM). This study aimed to investigate the outcome of OnabotulinumtoxinA (OBT-A) as preventative therapy in elderly CM patients. METHODS This is a post hoc analysis of real-life prospectively collected data at 16 European headache centers on CM patients treated with OBT-A over the first three treatment cycles (i.e., Cy1-3). We defined: OLD patients aged ≥ 65 years and nonOLD those < 65-year-old. The primary endpoint was the changes in monthly headache days (MHDs) from baseline to Cy 1-3 in OLD compared with nonOLD participants. The secondary endpoints were the responder rate (RR) ≥ 50%, conversion to episodic migraine (EM) and the changes in days with acute medication use (DAMs). RESULTS In a cohort of 2831 CM patients, 235 were OLD (8.3%, 73.2% females, 69.6 years SD 4.7). MHDs decreased from baseline (24.8 SD 6.2) to Cy-1 (17.5 SD 9.1, p < 0.000001), from Cy-1 to Cy-2 (14.8 SD 9.2, p < 0.0001), and from Cy-2 to Cy-3 (11.9 SD 7.9, p = 0.001). DAMs progressively reduced from baseline (19.2 SD 9.8) to Cy-1 (11.9 SD 8.8, p < 0.00001), to Cy-2 (10.9 SD 8.6, p = 0.012), to Cy-3 (9.6 SD 7.4, p = 0.049). The 50%RR increased from 30.7% (Cy-1) to 34.5% (Cy-2), to 38.7% (Cy-3). The above outcome measures did not differ in OLD compared with nonOLD patients. CONCLUSION In a population of elderly CM patients with a long history of migraine OBT-A provided a significant benefit, over the first three treatment cycles, as good as in non-old patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Altamura
- Unit of Headache and Neurosonology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy.
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
| | - R Ornello
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio 1 Coppito, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - F Ahmed
- Department of Neurosciences, Hull University Teaching Hospitals, Hull, UK
| | - A Negro
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - A M Miscio
- Unit of Neurology, Headache Center, Fondazione IRCCS "Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza", San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
| | - A Santoro
- Unit of Neurology, Headache Center, Fondazione IRCCS "Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza", San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
| | - A Alpuente
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Department of Medicine, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Russo
- Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic, and Aging Sciences, Headache Center, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - M Silvestro
- Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic, and Aging Sciences, Headache Center, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - S Cevoli
- IRCCS Istituto delle scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - N Brunelli
- Unit of Headache and Neurosonology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - L Grazzi
- Neurology Department, Headache Center, IRCCS Foundation "Carlo Besta" Neurological Institute, Via Celoria,11, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - C Baraldi
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse, Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, AOU Policlinico Di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - S Guerzoni
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse, Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, AOU Policlinico Di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - A P Andreou
- Headache Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - G Lambru
- Headache Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - I Frattale
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio 1 Coppito, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - K Kamm
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University München, Munich, Germany
| | - R Ruscheweyh
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University München, Munich, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Russo
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Headache Center, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - P Torelli
- Headache Center, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - E Filatova
- Department of Neurology, Institute for Postgraduate Education, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | - M Straburzynski
- Headache Clinic, Terapia Neurologiczna Samodzielni, Maurycego Mochnackiego 10, 02-042, Warsaw, Poland
| | - C Butera
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - B Colombo
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - M Filippi
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - P Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Department of Medicine, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - S Sacco
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio 1 Coppito, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - F Vernieri
- Unit of Headache and Neurosonology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Vila-Pueyo M, Cuenca-León E, Queirós AC, Kulis M, Sintas C, Cormand B, Martín-Subero JI, Pozo-Rosich P, Fernàndez-Castillo N, Macaya A. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis in an antimigraine-treated preclinical model of cortical spreading depolarization. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024221146317. [PMID: 36759321 DOI: 10.1177/03331024221146317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cortical spreading depolarization, the cause of migraine aura, is a short-lasting depolarization wave that moves across the brain cortex, transiently suppressing neuronal activity. Prophylactic treatments for migraine, such as topiramate or valproate, reduce the number of cortical spreading depression events in rodents. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether cortical spreading depolarization with and without chronic treatment with topiramate or valproate affect the DNA methylation of the cortex. METHODS Sprague-Dawley rats were intraperitoneally injected with saline, topiramate or valproate for four weeks when cortical spreading depolarization were induced and genome-wide DNA methylation was performed in the cortex of six rats per group. RESULTS The DNA methylation profile of the cortex was significantly modified after cortical spreading depolarization, with and without topiramate or valproate. Interestingly, topiramate reduced by almost 50% the number of differentially methylated regions, whereas valproate increased them by 17%, when comparing to the non-treated group after cortical spreading depolarization induction. The majority of the differentially methylated regions lay within intragenic regions, and the analyses of functional group over-representation retrieved several enriched functions, including functions related to protein processing in the cortical spreading depolarization without treatment group; functions related to metabolic processes in the cortical spreading depolarization with topiramate group; and functions related to synapse and ErbB, MAPK or retrograde endocannabinoid signaling in the cortical spreading depolarization with valproate group. CONCLUSIONS Our results may provide insights into the underlying physiological mechanisms of migraine with aura and emphasize the role of epigenetics in migraine susceptibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Vila-Pueyo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.,Pediatric Neurology Research Group, Vall Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ester Cuenca-León
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.,Departament de Genètica, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana C Queirós
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Kulis
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cèlia Sintas
- Departament de Genètica, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bru Cormand
- Departament de Genètica, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.,Institut de Biomedicina de la Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras, Spain.,Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain
| | - José Ignacio Martín-Subero
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.,Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.,Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Noèlia Fernàndez-Castillo
- Departament de Genètica, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.,Institut de Biomedicina de la Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras, Spain.,Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Alfons Macaya
- Pediatric Neurology Research Group, Vall Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.,Institute of Neuroscience, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona Spain
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Caronna E, Pozo-Rosich P. Virtual issue: COVID-19 and headache. Headache 2023; 63:183-184. [PMID: 36633206 DOI: 10.1111/head.14464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, microRNAs and histone modifications, may modulate the genetic expression in migraine and its interaction with internal and external factors, such as lifestyle and environmental changes. OBJECTIVE To summarize, contextualize and critically analyze the published literature on the current state of epigenetic mechanisms in migraine in a narrative review. FINDINGS The studies published to date have used different approaches and methodologies to determine the role of epigenetic mechanisms in migraine. Epigenetic changes seem to be involved in migraine and are increasing our knowledge of the disease. CONCLUSIONS Changes in DNA methylation, microRNA expression and histone modifications could be utilized as biomarkers that would be highly valuable for patient stratification, molecular diagnosis, and precision medicine in migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Víctor José Gallardo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Vila-Pueyo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.,Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Caronna E, van den Hoek TC, Bolay H, Garcia-Azorin D, Gago-Veiga AB, Valeriani M, Takizawa T, Messlinger K, Shapiro RE, Goadsby PJ, Ashina M, Tassorelli C, Diener HC, Terwindt GM, Pozo-Rosich P. Headache attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccination and the impact on primary headache disorders of the COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive review. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024221131337. [PMID: 36606562 DOI: 10.1177/03331024221131337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective is to summarize the knowledge on the epidemiology, pathophysiology and management of secondary headache attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination; as well as to delineate their impact on primary headache disorders. METHODS This is a narrative review of the literature regarding primary and secondary headache disorders in the setting of COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a literature search in 2022 on PubMed, with the keywords "COVID 19" or "vaccine" and "headache" to assess the appropriateness of all published articles for their inclusion in the review. RESULTS Headache is a common and sometimes difficult-to-treat symptom of both the acute and post-acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Different pathophysiological mechanisms may be involved, with the trigeminovascular system as a plausible target. Specific evidence-based effective therapeutic options are lacking at present. Headache attributed to SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations is also common, its pathophysiology being unclear. People with primary headache disorders experience headache in the acute phase of COVID-19 and after vaccination more commonly than the general population. Pandemic measures, forcing lifestyle changes, seemed to have had a positive impact on migraine, and changes in headache care (telemedicine) have been effectively introduced. CONCLUSIONS The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is a global challenge, having an impact on the development of secondary headaches, both in people with or without primary headaches. This has created opportunities to better understand and treat headache and to potentiate strategies to manage patients and ensure care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Caronna
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Hayrunnisa Bolay
- Department of Neurology and Algology, NÖROM, Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - David Garcia-Azorin
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.,Department of Medicine, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Ana Beatriz Gago-Veiga
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Neurology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Massimiliano Valeriani
- Headache Center, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Tsubasa Takizawa
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Karl Messlinger
- Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuernberg, Germany
| | - Robert E Shapiro
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, King's College London, London, UK.,Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.,Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Hans-Christoph Diener
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IMIBE) Faculty of Medicine, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Gisela M Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Membrilla JA, Torres-Ferrus M, Alpuente A, Caronna E, Pozo-Rosich P. Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab as a treatment of refractory episodic and chronic cluster headache: Case series and narrative review. Headache 2022; 62:1395-1405. [PMID: 36321947 DOI: 10.1111/head.14404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Galcanezumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), has demonstrated clinical benefit as a preventive treatment of episodic cluster headache (ECH) but not in chronic cluster headache (CCH) to this date. Our objective was to analyze our clinical experience of the compassionate use of galcanezumab in cluster headache and to conduct a narrative review of the published literature. METHODS We present a case series of patients with refractory ECH and CCH treated with 240 mg galcanezumab monthly in an outpatient headache clinic. We recorded epidemiologic and clinical data and analyzed the disease evolution after 3 and 6 months. The review was performed following the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS We included three patients with ECH who were treated during a refractory cluster bout (mean duration of 83.7 days since the first attack, range 46.0-105.0 days) and six patients with CCH who had a high frequency of attacks (mean 35.8 attacks/week, range 7-56) and refractory to a mean of 5.2 preventive treatments (range, 3-9). In the CCH group, >50% frequency reduction was seen in 83% (5/6 patients) and the number of attacks per week showed a mean reduction of -24.2 at month 3 (range, -6 to -49) and -27.6 at month 6 (range, -7 to -49). In the ECH group, the bout ended a mean 17.3 days (range, 10-28) after galcanezumab administration. One third of patients reported mild adverse events, none of them leading to discontinuation. CONCLUSION In conclusion, our clinical experience supports the use of galcanezumab in patients with refractory cluster headache. These results might encourage the possibility of continuing clinical development with randomized controlled trials of anti-CGRP treatments in patients with cluster headache.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marta Torres-Ferrus
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Pozo-Rosich P, Dodick DW, Ettrup A, Hirman J, Cady R. Shift in diagnostic classification of migraine after initiation of preventive treatment with eptinezumab: post hoc analysis of the PROMISE studies. BMC Neurol 2022; 22:394. [PMID: 36284281 PMCID: PMC9594902 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-022-02914-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monthly headache frequency directly correlates with personal/societal burden and impacts severity and preventive treatment decisions. This post hoc analysis identified shifts from higher to lower frequency headache categories over 6 months in patients with migraine participating in the PROMISE clinical trials receiving two eptinezumab doses. METHODS Headache frequency at baseline and over study months 1-6 was categorized into 4 groups: chronic migraine (CM; ≥ 15 monthly headache days [MHDs]), high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM; 10-14 MHDs), low-frequency episodic migraine (LFEM; 4-9 MHDs), and ≤ 3 MHDs. Outcomes included the percentage of patients within each MHD category, the percentage of patients improving by ≥ 1 MHD category, and the number of months with reduction of ≥ 1 MHD category. Data from patients who received approved eptinezumab doses (100 mg or 300 mg) or placebo were included. RESULTS Mean headache frequency at baseline in PROMISE-1 was 10 MHDs; most patients were classified as having HFEM (48.6%) or LFEM (43.9%). At Month 1, 62/221 (28.1%), 75/222 (33.8%), and 45/222 (20.3%) patients who received eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, and placebo had ≤ 3 MHDs, with 97/221 (43.9%), 108/222 (48.6%), and 84/222 (37.8%), respectively, falling below the diagnostic EM threshold at Month 6. More than one-third (79/221 [35.7%], 83/222 [37.4%], and 68/222 [30.6%] of patients in the eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, and placebo groups, respectively), had 6 months of reduction of ≥ 1 frequency category. At baseline in PROMISE-2, mean headache frequency was 20.5 MHDs. All patients (100%) in the eptinezumab 100 mg and placebo groups had CM, as did 99.4% of patients receiving eptinezumab 300 mg. At Month 1, 209/356 (58.7%), 216/350 (61.7%), and 167/366 (45.6%) patients treated with eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, and placebo had ≤ 14 MHDs, with 240/356 (67.4%), 249/350 (71.1%), and 221/366 (60.4%), respectively, falling below CM threshold at Month 6. Additionally, 153/356 (43.0%), 169/350 (48.3%), and 116/366 (31.7%) patients in the eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, and placebo groups, respectively, had 6 months of reduction of ≥ 1 frequency category. CONCLUSION In the PROMISE studies, episodic and chronic migraine patients treated with eptinezumab were more likely to reduce their headache frequency versus placebo, which directly and in a sustained way improved their diagnostic category classification. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02559895, NCT02974153.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- grid.7080.f0000 0001 2296 0625Neurology Department, Headache Unit, Vall d’Hebron, University Hospital and Research Institute, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain ,grid.7080.f0000 0001 2296 0625Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Department de Medicina, Vall d’Hebron, University Hospital and Research Institute, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David W. Dodick
- grid.417468.80000 0000 8875 6339Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ USA ,Atria Institute, New York, NY USA
| | - Anders Ettrup
- grid.424580.f0000 0004 0476 7612H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joe Hirman
- Pacific Northwest Statistical Consulting, Inc., Woodinville, WA USA
| | - Roger Cady
- grid.419796.4Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL USA ,RK Consults, Ozark, MO USA ,grid.260126.10000 0001 0745 8995Missouri State University, Springfield, MO USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sacco S, Lampl C, Amin FM, Braschinsky M, Deligianni C, Uludüz D, Versijpt J, Ducros A, Gil-Gouveia R, Katsarava Z, Martelletti P, Ornello R, Raffaelli B, Boucherie DM, Pozo-Rosich P, Sanchez-Del-Rio M, Sinclair A, Maassen van den Brink A, Reuter U. European Headache Federation (EHF) consensus on the definition of effective treatment of a migraine attack and of triptan failure. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:133. [PMID: 36224519 PMCID: PMC9555163 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01502-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Triptans are migraine-specific acute treatments. A well-accepted definition of triptan failure is needed in clinical practice and for research. The primary aim of the present Consensus was to provide a definition of triptan failure. To develop this definition, we deemed necessary to develop as first a consensus definition of effective treatment of an acute migraine attack and of triptan-responder. Main body The Consensus process included a preliminary literature review, a Delphi round and a subsequent open discussion. According to the Consensus Panel, effective treatment of a migraine attack is to be defined on patient well-being featured by a) improvement of headache, b) relief of non-pain symptoms and c) absence of adverse events. An attack is considered effectively treated if patient’s well-being, as defined above, is restored within 2 hours and for at least 24 hours. An individual with migraine is considered as triptan-responder when the given triptan leads to effective acute attack treatment in at least three out of four migraine attacks. On the other hand, an individual with migraine is considered triptan non-responder in the presence of failure of a single triptan (not matching the definition of triptan-responder). The Consensus Panel defined an individual with migraine as triptan-resistant in the presence of failure of at least 2 triptans; triptan refractory, in the presence of failure to at least 3 triptans, including subcutaneous formulation; triptan ineligibile in the presence of an acknowledged contraindication to triptan use, as specified in the summary of product characteristics. Conclusions The novel definitions can be useful in clinical practice for the assessment of acute attack treatments patients with migraine. They may be helpful in identifying people not responding to triptans and in need for novel acute migraine treatments. The definitions will also be of help in standardizing research on migraine acute care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01502-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio 1, L'Aquila, Italy.
| | - Christian Lampl
- Department of Neurology, Headache Medical Center at the Konventhospital BHB Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Faisal Mohammad Amin
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Neurorehabilitation/Traumatic Brain Injury, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mark Braschinsky
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu; Headache Clinic, Department of Neurology, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Christina Deligianni
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Derya Uludüz
- Department of Neurology Istanbul Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jan Versijpt
- Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair, Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anne Ducros
- Neurology Department, CHU de Montpellier Charles Coulomb Laboratory, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
| | - Raquel Gil-Gouveia
- Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz Headache Center, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal.,Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Zaza Katsarava
- Christian Hospital, Unna, Germany.,University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio 1, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Deirdre M Boucherie
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Medicine, Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Alexandra Sinclair
- Institute of Metabolism and Sytems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|